3DEXPERIENCE Conference Design, Modeling and Simulation
19 – 21 Nov. 2019
Post-buckling behavior of thin-walled damaged laminates under
Compression-After-Impact loading
Hamburg University of Applied Science (HAW Hamburg) Aurelio Jose Olivares-Ferrer, Markus Linke
1. Introduction
2. Problems
3. Solution approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
OUTLINE
1. Introduction
2. Problems
3. Solution approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
OUTLINE
Composites in the Aeronautical industry
Optimize structures by reducing weight:
Thin-walled laminates
Structural components mainly use:
Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP)
Excellent mechanical properties, such as:
•
Specific strength
•
Specific stiffness
But, CFRP laminates have a main
drawback:
1. INTRODUCTION
Aircraft receive lots of impacts during their life
Mainly
low-energy impacts
caused by:
•
Ground operation (main cause)
•
Runway debris
Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID)
1. INTRODUCTION
(Delaminations projected view)
X Y
The most widely used because:
•
Projected view of delaminations (2D)
•
In-airfield application
Internal damage detection
Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques
Compression-After-Impact (CAI) tests
on laminated flat plates
1) Impact test
(damaging the samples at a controlled energy)
2) Inspection test
(dimensioning the damage size)
3) CAI test
(residual strength)
Check the
residual strength
of laminates with BVID
Simply Supported Clamped
OBJECTIVE:
Get more knowledge about failure mechanisms of CAI test of
thin-walled CFRP
laminates with BVID
By creating finite element models with Abaqus software
1. Introduction
2. Problems
3. Solution approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
OUTLINE
The FE model of
CAI test
of
thin-walled laminates
must face:
Laminate
modeling
2.
PROBLEMS
Laminate modeling strategy and material definition
• Plies and interfaces.
• Damage initiation criteria for intra- and interlaminar failure modes.
• Damage evolution models for intra- and interlaminar failure modes (material non-linearities).
Laminate
modeling
buckling
Global
Y Z
2.
PROBLEMS
Post-buckling behavior
• In thin-plates, the buckling load is lower than the compression failure load of an ideal straight plate.
The FE model of
CAI test
of
thin-walled laminates
must face:
Z X
Laminate
modeling
buckling
Global
Initial
geometrical
imperfection
2.
PROBLEMS
Geometrical non-linearities
• Permanent deformations in the plate due to the previous impact.
• Influence the post-buckling behavior.
Laminate
modeling
buckling
Global
Initial
geometrical
imperfection
Internal
damage
Y2.
PROBLEMS
Modeling strategy of the initial damage
• Only a 2D projected view of the delaminated area known.
• Unknown damage pattern in the through-thickness
Z X
Laminate
modeling
buckling
Global
Initial
geometrical
imperfection
Internal
damage
Y X Y X Z2.
PROBLEMS
1. Introduction
2. Problems
3. Solution approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
OUTLINE
Geometry and boundary conditions
a = 120mm
b = 90mm
Original CAI test
Simplification used in the
models
3. SOLUTION APPROACH
Y X a = 120mm b = 90mm Y X• Physical thickness is needed to model interfaces between layers.
Laminate modeling
Layers modeling strategy
Equivalent Single Layer (ESL) Cross-section Zoom-in Layers Interfaces Y Z Layer 1 Layer 2
.
.
.
Layer N Interface 1 Interface 2.
.
.
Interface N X3. SOLUTION APPROACH
Laminate modeling
Materia models
Layers
Interfaces
• Elastic behavior: Traction-separation law
• Damage initiation: Quadratic nominal stress criterion
• Damage evolution: Energy based
• Mixed mode: Benzeggagh-Kenane
• Laminate: [ 0w, 0, 90, 0, 90, 0, 90 ]s
• Layers: 12 unidirectional (UD) and 2 woven (W)
• Damage initiation: Hashin’s criteria
• Damage evolution: Energy based
• Softening: Linear
Post-buckling behavior
An initial perturbation is required to allow the geometrical non-linear behavior
Linear
buckling
Post-buckling
• Shapes of the buckling modes.
• The permanent deformation due to the impact is approximated by the first buckling mode.
• The perturbation is added by an initial geometrical imperfection.
3. SOLUTION APPROACH
Experimental
measurement approximationFE model
Source:
Olivares-Ferrer, A. J., et al (2019)
Initial geometrical imperfection
Y X
Y X
Initial damage modeling
Interfaces
Initially undamaged
Initially damaged
• Only initial delaminations are considered.
• Interfaces are divided into two zones.
• Damage idealization based on ultrasonic scans.
• Elliptical damage shape idealization.
X Y X Undamaged Damaged Interfaces
3. SOLUTION APPROACH
Simulation procedure
Solver
Static Riks
• Higher computation time.
• Lower computation time.
• But it has problems with delamination growth.
• Useful for verifying the explicit simulation without considering the interfaces (delaminations).
1. Introduction
2. Problems
3. Solution approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
OUTLINE
Different through-thickness damage pattern idealization
XCylindrical pattern
y
z
DelaminationUndamaged interfacePly
Conical pattern
Undamaged Conical Cylindrical 267 183 219 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 Failure S tress [Mpa] 31% 18%4. RESULTS
Imp=0.1mm Imp=0.2mm Imp=0.4mm 269 215 267 219 264 228 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Undamaged Damaged Failure S tress [Mpa]
Different magnitudes of the geometrical imperfection
4. RESULTS
Shape of the geometrical imperfection
4. RESULTS
b /2 b /2
Stress distribution comparison (𝛔𝛔𝐏𝐏 = 𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏 𝐌𝐌𝐏𝐏𝐌𝐌)
400 200 0 -200 Pl y St re ss , 𝛔𝛔𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏 [ 𝐌𝐌 𝐏𝐏𝐌𝐌 ] -400 -600 -800 600 Y Coordinate, 𝐲𝐲[𝐦𝐦𝐦𝐦] -50-40-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Damaged beff/2 beff/2 Undamaged
Interaction between global buckling and local delaminations
Middle
section
σ
P1. Introduction
2. Problems
3. Solution approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
OUTLINE
5. CONCLUSIONS
•
The creation of a finite element model that considers post-buckling behavior, initial geometrical
imperfection, initial damage and intra- and interlaminar damage evolution is feasible with ABAQUS
software.
•
A better understanding of the CAI test with thin-walled laminates is being possible through the investigation
of these models.
•
Further research still can be performed with the CAI models in order to improve the prediction of its
behavior.
1. Olivares-Ferrer, A. J., Linke, M., García-Manrique, J. A. (2019) Influence of geometric imperfections and
internal damage patterns of thin-walled laminates on failure in Compression-After-Impact testing,
Procedia Manufacturing.
REFERENCES
3DEXPERIENCE Conference Design, Modeling and Simulation 19 – 21 Nov. 2019
MANY THANKS
Questions?
CONTACT DETAILS: