• No results found

Engineers Symposium on

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Engineers Symposium on"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

28th Institution of Chemical

Engineers Symposium

on

Hazards 2018 (HAZARDS 28)

Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 163

Edinburgh,

United

Kingdom 15-17May

2018

ISBN: 978-1-5108-6463-4

(2)

Hazards

T-

Engineering &Design I

Paper01 The Future is Here: RoboticCatalystRemoval 1

ChristopherJansen(WorleyParsom, Australia),Andrew W.Sloley& Scott Schroeder(Advisian, WorleyParsons Group, USA)

Paper02 Sizingofsafetyvalves fornon-flashing gas-liquidflowtoprotectaheatexchanger-application

oftheHNE-CSEmodel 10

SaraClaramunt,NatalieSchmidt,Jens Denecke &JiirgenSchmidt(CSE-Engineering, Germany) Paper03 Optimizationof Blowout PreventerDesignforOptimalCost andReliability 23

DenisSu-Feher,NileshAde,YogeshKoirala,BinZhang,M. Sam Mannan(TexasA&M University, USA)

Paper04 Maximum Allowable ValvePassingRate Review and Determination 35 J. L. Hobbs & REmery (MMI Engineering, UK)

ATEX/DSEAR

Paper05 Are Burner management systems and SIL Determinationanexplosivemixture? 44 Gaynor Woodford-Phillips&StephenBeedle(ABB Consulting, UK)

Paper06 Howbigshould Zonesbe,if thereatall?-Practicalexperiencefrom PharmaChem and Food &

Drinksectors 55

Pat Swords(PM Group, Ireland), KayleyOseman(PM Group, UK) Paper07 InstructionsForSafeUse-HowGoodAreThey? 67

Jonathon Lowe(RPS, UK)

Paper08 Hazardous Area Classification ofPotentially Explosive AtmospheresDuringAircraftFuelling Operations 82

Andrew Garrison(RPS, UK)

Environmental Risk Assessment

Paper09 1CAM domore-Whatarethetruebenefits ofavertingaMATTE? 91

JackDavy (Wood, UK)

Paper10 AddressingtheChallengesofApplyingthe CDOIF Guideline for Environmental Risk Tolerabilityin Risk Assessments for COMAH Establishments 103

CarolynNicholls & Robert Ritchie(RAS Ltd, UK)

Paper11 EnvironmentalRiskAssessment:StreamliningCDOIF Guideline 115

Peter Waite(Astrid Consulting, UK),Matt Johns & MattMaynard (JohnsAssociates, UK), Henry Betts(ColorGas,UK)

Paper12 Developmentsinthinkingabout emergencyliquidcontainmentsystemsin the process and allied industries 126

Chris Dickinson(TheEnvironmentAgency, UK)

SafetyCulture

Paper13 Managementof Human Error inaSafetyCaseusingBowtie-Acasestudy 138 IlizastiguiPerez Fidel(Risquest SafetyConsultants, Cuba)

Paper14 Processsafetyonthe road 145 Paul Rochette(BASF. Belgium)

Paper15 BridgingtheSafety Gap:TheKeyRole ofaSound ProcessSafetyCultureinMinimizingAudit Findings 155

Elena Prats & GemmaDunjo (ioMosaic Corporation, USA) Paper 16 Experiencing operationalprocesssafety-whileatuniversity 163

Trish Kerin(IChemE SafetyCentre, Australia)

(3)

Fire & Explosions

Paper17 GasExplosionProtection for AerosolFillingRooms-Full ScaleTestingandAnalytical Validation 167

Tim Jones(MMI Engineering, UK),Paul Davidson(Unilever, UK) Paper18 Hightemperatureliquid jetfiretesting 177

Richard Alker(BAE Systems, UK), GeoffreyChamberlain(Waverton ConsultancyLtd, UK) Paper19 Inert Hot Particle-UnconventionalIgnitionSource 190

Jonathan Bechem & Uli Barth(University of Wuppertal, Germany)

Pipelines

Paper20 NewDevelopmentsin theApproachtoAssessingthe Potential Interaction between Parallel Pipelines 197

MikeActon,Kostas Dimitriadis & Clive Robinson(DNVGL, UK)

Paper21 Theroleof Individual and SocietalRisk intheALARP demonstration forPipelines 208 Jerry Mullins,AndrewDoyle& KatherineTaylor (ROSEN, UK)

Paper22 Ananalysisof the emergency isolation ofhigh-pressure pipelines transporting supercriticalfluids Sergey Martynov,HarounMahgerefteh& Jianhao Yu(University CollegeLondon, UK)

Environmental Protection

Paper23 Vulnerabilityand Risk AssessmentAnalysisof Natech Events CausedbyNatural Phenomena 224 OscarJ.RamirezOlivar, Santiago Zuluaga Mayorga,FelipeMufiozGiraldo & Mauricio

Sanchez-Silva(Universidadde losAndes, Colombia),Ana Maria Cmz(Kyoto University, Japan),Jean-Paul Pinelli(FloridaInstituteof Technology. USA),Ernesto Salzano(University of

Bologna, Italy)

Paper24 Managingtherisk associated withseverewind and floodeventsin the chemicalprocessing industries 236

Patrick Mahan & Frank Liserio(EM Global, USA)

Paper25 A risk management framework for NaTech scenarios causedby flooding 246

Gabriele Landucci(LeidenUniversity. The Netherlands & University ofPisa, Italy),Giacomo Antonioni&Valerio Cozzani(University of Bologna, Italy)

SafetyCases

Paper26 AreSafetyCasespast their sellbydate? Canwemake themmorerelevant? 256 EmmaThompson& MarkTaylor (ERM, UK)

Paper27 Guidancefor UKSafetyCaseCompliancefor Offshore Installations in LateLife, DecommissioningandDismantling,basedonindustry experience 263 AlisonMcKay (ABBConsulting, UK),Trish Sentance(Oil& GasUK) Paper28 BeatingLuck: AbreakthroughinMajorAccident HazardPrevention 271

Konstantia Kalabaliki(ENERGIA Engineering, UK)

Safety Management

Paper29 Thinkingin Outcomes-MaintainingFocusonWhatProcessSafetyDelivers in Risk Management 281

Ian Travers(Leidos, UK)

Paper30 PracticalexperiencewithManagementofChange reflectingupon incidents, auditsandgap analyses 286

GraemeLaughland (ABB Consulting, UK)

Paper31 BowTies in RiskManagement;usingthenewCCPS-E1 booktoavoidpitfalls 292

Martin Johnson (BP. UK),Mark Manton(ABS Group, UK),CharlesCowley (CCPS, UK),Mark Scanlon(EnergyInstitute. UK)

(4)

RiskManagement

Paper32 AssessingandMitigatingthe Risks from BundOvertopping 302

AnnHalford,CliveRobinson,GabrieleFerrara& TarekBengherbia(DNVGL, UK)

Paper33 Implementing safetyassessmentsandmanagement systems-aparallelbetweenhighandnon- highhazard industries 316

Livia Cardoso Silveira &FillipeDobbin Caruso (BureauVeritas, UK)

Paper34 Lessons fromamajor safetyincidentduringanon-regulated 14-yearturnaround maintenance

cycle 324

famunoO. Olu-Tima(PHRC, Nigeria)

Fire & Gas Detection

Paper35 Benefits of Gas DetectionMappinginComplexProcess Facilities 336 Fiona Aoun & Samer Bachir(Chevron, UK)

Paper36 A risk-basedapproachtoidentifyingthe locationoffire and gas detectorsforanonshore process plant 346

Stuart Buchanan(Ineos Manufacturing, UK),MikeMcKay (ABBConsulting, UK)

Paper37 Factors in theselectionphilosophiesand criteriatoimproveF&G detection anduseof PFP 354 Ian Herbert(MMI EngineeringLtd, UK)

Lessons Learned

Paper38 A reviewonToulouse accident trials:can welearnthelessonsdespite uncertaintyondirect causes? 362

NicolasDechy (IRSN, France),ZsuzsannaGyenes (IChemE, UK),MyriamMerad(CNRS.

France)

Paper39 Enhancing Learningfrom Incidents-FiveTried and TestedApproaches 370 StevenFlynn (IndependentConsultant, UK)

Paper40 Lessons learned from fuel storageaccidents:Aftermathsandchallengesahead 379 Ravi KumarSharma,Bhola RamGurjar&RajatAgrawal (IndianInstituteof Technology Roorkee,India)

Consequence Modelling

Paper41 QuantifyingRisk andHowIt All GoesWrong 394 KeithMiller(IndependentConsultant,UK)

Paper42 Newparadigmsfordeterminingstructuraldesignloads for blast 406 Steve Howell & PrankulMiddha(Abercus, UK)

Paper43 AssessingPersonnelRiskAssociated withProjectilesresulted from Over Pressure Failures 415 Brian Clarkson(Air Products, UK),DerekMiller(AirProductsInc., USA)

Paper44 Analysisand validation ofintegral pool spreadingmodel of LNGspillsonconcrete 426 NisaUlumuddin,Tomasz Olewski & Luc Vechot(TexasA&MUniversityatQatar)

Human Factors

Paper45 Check Mate: A framework foroptimisinghuman-basedchecking 440 Shona Watson & Robert Sides(GreenstreetBermanLtd, UK)

Paper46 Who isrunningyourplantat3.00 am? 450

John Bresland(ProcessSafetyRiskAssessmentLLC, USA),Ian Travers(Leidos, UK) Paper47 Developmentsin Human Factors Critical Task Reviews(HFCTR) 458

Jamie Henderson& Neil Hunter(Human-ReIlabilityAssociatesLtd, UK)

Paper48 Addressinghumanreliability quantificationissues in COMAHreports usingthe SHERPAand

SLIMmethodologies N/A

DavidEmbrey (Human Reliability Associates, UK)

(5)

Risk Assessment

Paper49 Experiencesin ALARP Demonstration 465 A.G. Rushton & M. R. Finch(ESR Technology, UK)

Paper50 Risktolerability targets; misconceived,misunderstood andmisapplied 477 Andy Stanley, CarolynNicholls,BobBurnup& Jordan Smith(RAS Ltd, UK) Paper51 Improving Analysisof Hazard&Risk IdentificationWorkshops 488

JamesTurner(Wood, UK)

Paper52 HAZOP,Yesterday, Today,Tomorrow 502 FrankCrawley (University of Strathclyde,UK)

Engineering & Design II

Paper53 DesignandSpecificationof Radar BasedEarly WarningSystems 511

TrevorHarvey& Paul Oram(BP Upstream, UK),Jonathan Love(ImperialCollege, UK) Paper54 Emission ReductionStudyWhen GasFlaringis Inevitable 519

Konstantia Kalabaliki(ENERGIA Engineering, UK),AliceTanguenza (ENERECOSpA, Italy) Paper55 ProcessSafetyin Automotive &TransportationR&DTesting-Basis ofSafetyfora700 bar

HydrogenTank TestBench &DemonstratorFillingStation 535 Robert Cowan(Prorec GmbH, Germany)

Paper56 AConceptual DesignofaMobile Shale GasProcessing Facility 544 Trixie Pomares(DNVGL. UK)

Digital Technology

Paper57 Incorporatingincidentreportsin bow-ties withBigDatatechniques 552

CoenvanGulijk, MiguelFigueres-Esteban& PeterHughes (University ofHuddersfield, UK),

PaulMcCullogh (CGERisk, TheNetherlands) Paper58 The Gamification of ProcessSafety 560

AngusKeddie(Process Safety Matters, UK) Paper59 Igloosystemheats uptraining 570

PhilJones &TonyAtkinson(BPEuropean Acetyls. UK)

EmergencyResponse

Paper60 SiteSpecificRisk Information-TakingOwnership 574 SimonDowning(RPS.UK)

Paper61 Decisionmakinginemergencyresponse-Structuralanalysisofdecision-makingprocessesof fire servicesatindustrial accidents 579

HannesKern &JiirgenHammerschmied(MontanuniversitaetLeoben, Germany) Paper62 Learningfrom emergency responseinthe processindustries 585

ZsuzsannaGyenes (IChemE Safety Centre, UK)

InherentSafety

Paper63 InherentlySaferDesign:it'snotjustwhatyoudo it's the way that you doit,and that's whatgets results 591

CraigSkinner(BPInternationalLimited, UK)

Paper64 InherentlySaferDesign (ISD)inSourGasProcessingFacilities 597

J.Bello,N.Haris.J. Venables & N.Amort(Fluor, UK)

Paper65 Criteria forseparationdistances betweenmajorhazardinstallationstolimit the risk ofescalating domino failures 610

Debra C Mitchell(ISHECON,SouthAfrica)

(6)

Bioprocessing

Paper66

Paper67 Paper68

Posters

Poster 01

Poster 02

Poster 03

Poster 04

Poster 05

Poster 06

Poster 07

Poster 08

Poster 09

Poster 10

Poster 11

Poster 12

Poster 13

Accidentalratein Biodieselproduction plants 620

Enrico Danzi & Luca Marnio(Politecnicodi Torino,Italy),Valeria Casson Moreno, Ernesto Salzano & ValerioCozzani(UniversityofBologna, Italy)

HazardandSafetyManagementin Industrial Bio-based Processes 629 Valeria Casson Moreno & Valerio Cozzani(University of Bologna,Italy) TowardsanInherentlySaferBioprocessing Industry 638

NileshAde,YogeshKoirala & M. Sam Mannan(TexasA&MUniversity, USA)

GuidanceonALARP forMajorHazard Facilities 649 AdrianBunn(Aker Engineering&TechnologyLtd, UK)

ProcessSafetyIndex-Anobjective,consistent method forevaluatingthe balance between Threats and Protection 664

David Hatch(Process SafetyIntegrity, UK)

Visual HAZOP-Exploitingthe powerof Bowties toimprove study efficiencyand enhance engagement 669

DavidHatch(Process Safety Integrity, UK)

Proactivemonitoringof risk-based indicators:exampleofapplicationin the Oil & Gasintegrated operations 675

Gabriele Landucci(Leiden University,The Netherlands& UniversityofPisa,Italy),Nicola Paltrinieri(Norwegian University ofScience andTechnologyNTNU,Norway)

A three-dimensional visualization tool to support HSEmanagementof chemicalfacilities 686 Federica Ovidi(University ofPisa,Italy), LuigiPicconi & Tommaso Chiavistelli(Chemical Controls s.r.l..Italy),Gabriele Landucci(Leiden University,The Netherlands & Universityof Pisa,Italy)

UnderstandingRiskData:TechniquesforPresentingRiskto aNon-Technical Audience 697 JimMcDougall, MarkTaylor& Naushad Tahsildar(ERM, UK),RosMasson(Premier Oil, UK) DevelopmentofProcessSafety LeadingIndicatorsforMajorHazards InstallationUsingThe CausalReasoningApproach 711

Emeka Maduabuchi(ShellPetroleumDevelopment Company, Nigeria)

NewApproach:Lookingfor theUnderlyingCauses of BOU ALI SINA Petrochemical Massive FireUsingthe Socio-Technical Context 715

MeliranKhalilnejadi (Chagalesh Consulting Engineers, Iran)

Requirementsonemergencyanddisastermanagementatindustrialmajoraccident hazard sites-

astatussurveyonAustria 723

Christian Resch(ResilienceSolutions International,Austria)

Processsafetyand risk management in thepetrochemical industry.A culturalperspective 732 Majed Aljohani&JenniferSkilling (University of Edinburgh. UK)

Toxic Gas DetectorArrayEvaluation 736

SteveForster,Graham Tickle & Folake Akinnusi(ESR Technology, UK)

Incorporationofinherentlysaferdesign principlesinprocesssafetyassurance:Association with riskassessmentanduseof risk-basedapproach 740

Ming Yang (Nazarbayev University, Republic ofKazakhstan)

OperationsReadiness& AssuranceTransferability;GastoGales N/A

KeithMurphy (Neptune Energy, UK),JamieDempster (ENGIEOffshore Wind,UK)

References

Related documents

While a generic brute-force adversary running in 2 t steps gives a theoretical lower bound of t bits on the ciphertext overhead for IND-CPA security, the best known IND-CCA

The accurate mechanism is unclear, but the decrease in neutrophil function obtained with 50 ␮ g of peptide 2/ml was consistent with the decreased levels of expression of p47 phox

Chairs and Rapporteurs Gianna Avellis • Marie Curie Fellows Association & InnovaPuglia Antonella di Trapani • Marie Curie Fellows Association Maria Manuela

1/2 Port Channelized T1/E1 PRI Network Module (NM-1CE1T1-PRI and NM-2CE1T1-PRI) How to Configure the NM-xCE1T1-PRI Feature..

KPI Reporting Architecture – Early Watch Alert (EWA) EWA BI Content BI Queries CPH BW Content System n + Additional Service Data System 2 … Collected EWA Data System 1 EWA

In fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012, the State appropriated funds directly to the Department of Budget and Finance to pay for debt service on general obligation bonds issued for

The protocol described below is for one standard curve (48 wells) and samples (452 wells). Dilution of standards can be done in 1X AlphaLISA HiBlock Buffer or cell culture medium. If