• No results found

[Fe(thf)6][Cl3Fe–O–FeCl3]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "[Fe(thf)6][Cl3Fe–O–FeCl3]"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

metal-organic papers

m216

Michael Bolteet al. [Fe(C4H8O)6][Fe2Cl6O] DOI: 101107/S1600536801007115 Acta Cryst.(2001). E57, m216±m217 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

[Fe(thf)

6

][Cl

3

Fe±O±FeCl

3

]

Michael Bolte,a* Hans-Wolfram Lernerband Stefan Scholzb

aInstitut fuÈr Organische Chemie, J. W.

Goethe-UniversitaÈt Frankfurt, Marie-Curie-Straûe 11, 60439 Frankfurt/Main, Germany, andbInstitut fuÈr Anorganische Chemie, J. W. Goethe-UniversitaÈt Frankfurt, Marie-Curie-Straûe 11, 60439 Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 173 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.009 AÊ

Rfactor = 0.056

wRfactor = 0.133

Data-to-parameter ratio = 22.7

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2001 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

The title compound, hexakis(tetrahydrofuran)iron(II) -oxo-bis[trichloroferrate(III)], [Fe(C4H8O)6][Fe2Cl6O], was

obtained by oxidation of FeCl2 in tetrahydrofuran. The O

atom of the anion and the Fe atom of the cation are located on special positions of site symmetry 3; the Fe atoms of the anion are located on a threefold rotation axis and, as a result, there is just1

6of both ions in the asymmetric unit.

Comment

In contrast to established ferrocene, only a few compounds with two bonds, RÐFeÐR, are known. Therefore, we became interested in the synthesis of the supersilylated compound tBu

3SiÐFeÐSitBu3, which we obtained from

sodium supersilanide,tBu

3SiNa, and iron(II) chloride, FeCl2,

in tetrahydrofuran at 195 K.

FeCl2+ 2tBu3SiNa!2tBu3SiÐFeÐSitBu3+ 2NaCl

In this context, we have prepared a calibrated solution (0.5M) of FeCl2 in tetrahydrofuran. After several

investiga-tions, the Fe2+in this calibrated solution was partially oxidized.

3FeCl2+ 0.5O2![Fe(thf)6]2+[Cl3FeÐOÐFeCl3]2ÿ

While in biological systems oxidation with oxygen from Fe2+

to Fe3+ is important, the molecular structure of the title

compound, (I), is of general interest.

The O atom of the anion and the Fe atom of the cation are located on special positions of site symmetry 3; the Fe atoms of the anion are located on a threefold rotation axis and, as a result, there is just1

6of both ions in the asymmetric unit. The

FeÐOÐFe system in the anion is linear for symmetry reasons.

(2)

Experimental

A solution of 1.072 g (8.51 mmol) FeCl2in 17 ml tetrahydrofuran was oxidized with dry air. Red cubic crystals of the title compound were obtained from this solution at 248 K.

Crystal data

[Fe(C4H8O)6][Fe2Cl6O]

Mr= 828.87

Cubic,Pa3

a= 15.244 (2) AÊ

V= 3542.4 (8) AÊ3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.554 Mg mÿ3

MoKradiation

Cell parameters from 502 re¯ections

= 2.7±20.1

= 1.70 mmÿ1

T= 173 (2) K Plate, red

0.280.280.12 mm

Data collection

Siemens CCD three-circle diffract-ometer

!scans

Absorption correction: empirical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin= 0.647,Tmax= 0.822 36 645 measured re¯ections 1405 independent re¯ections 792 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.068 max= 28.2

h=ÿ19!19

k=ÿ20!17

l=ÿ19!20 123 standard re¯ections

frequency: 1200 min intensity decay: none

Re®nement

Re®nement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.056

wR(F2) = 0.133

S= 1.03 1405 re¯ections 62 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0415P)2

+ 11.6567P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001 max= 0.46 e AÊÿ3 min=ÿ0.46 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (AÊ,).

Fe1ÐO1 1.7510 (12)

Fe1ÐCl1 2.2273 (14) Fe2ÐO2 2.171 (3) O1ÐFe1ÐCl1 110.54 (5) O2ÐFe2ÐO2i 90.44 (11)

Symmetry code: (i)3

2ÿz;1ÿx;12‡y.

All H atoms were located by difference Fourier synthesis and re®ned with ®xed individual displacement parameters [U(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)] using a riding model with CÐH = 0.99 AÊ.

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell re®nement:

SMART; data reduction:SAINT(Siemens, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to re®ne structure:SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

XPinSHELXTL-Plus(Sheldrick, 1991).

References

Sheldrick, G. M. (1990).Acta Cryst.A46, 467 - 473.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1991).SHELXTL-Plus.Release 4.1. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997).SHELXL97. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Siemens (1995).SMARTandSAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments

Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Figure 1

(3)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m216–m217

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m216–m217 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801007115]

[Fe(thf)

6

][Cl

3

Fe

O

FeCl

3

]

Michael Bolte, Hans-Wolfram Lerner and Stefan Scholz

(I)

Crystal data

[Fe(C4H8O)6][Fe2Cl6O]

Mr = 828.87

Cubic, Pa3

a = 15.244 (2) Å

V = 3542.4 (8) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 1712

Dx = 1.554 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 502 reflections

θ = 2.7–20.1°

µ = 1.70 mm−1

T = 173 K Plate, red

0.28 × 0.28 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Siemens CCD three-circle diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

ω scans

Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)

(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin = 0.647, Tmax = 0.822

36645 measured reflections 1405 independent reflections 792 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.068

θmax = 28.2°, θmin = 2.3°

h = −19→19

k = −20→17

l = −19→20

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056

wR(F2) = 0.133

S = 1.03 1405 reflections 62 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0415P)2 + 11.6567P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001 Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3

Special details

Experimental. ;

(4)

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

Fe1 0.56632 (4) 0.56632 (4) 0.56632 (4) 0.0277 (3)

Cl1 0.48436 (9) 0.64660 (9) 0.65679 (9) 0.0408 (4)

O1 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.044 (2)

Fe2 0.5000 0.5000 1.0000 0.0219 (4)

O2 0.45429 (18) 0.4252 (2) 0.88772 (18) 0.0243 (7)

C2 0.5008 (3) 0.4178 (4) 0.8049 (3) 0.0365 (12)

H2A 0.5472 0.3725 0.8085 0.044*

H2B 0.5281 0.4745 0.7887 0.044*

C3 0.4336 (5) 0.3929 (6) 0.7411 (4) 0.079 (2)

H3A 0.4139 0.4453 0.7081 0.094*

H3B 0.4582 0.3502 0.6987 0.094*

C4 0.3614 (4) 0.3547 (5) 0.7862 (4) 0.066 (2)

H4A 0.3617 0.2902 0.7788 0.079*

H4B 0.3054 0.3780 0.7630 0.079*

C5 0.3717 (3) 0.3783 (4) 0.8807 (3) 0.0361 (12)

H5A 0.3224 0.4158 0.9002 0.043*

H5B 0.3728 0.3247 0.9174 0.043*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

Fe1 0.0277 (3) 0.0277 (3) 0.0277 (3) −0.0022 (3) −0.0022 (3) −0.0022 (3)

Cl1 0.0441 (8) 0.0421 (8) 0.0364 (7) 0.0078 (6) 0.0072 (6) −0.0008 (6)

O1 0.044 (2) 0.044 (2) 0.044 (2) 0.001 (3) 0.001 (3) 0.001 (3)

Fe2 0.0219 (4) 0.0219 (4) 0.0219 (4) −0.0002 (4) −0.0002 (4) 0.0002 (4)

O2 0.0242 (17) 0.0309 (18) 0.0177 (16) −0.0026 (14) 0.0004 (13) −0.0024 (14)

C2 0.039 (3) 0.048 (3) 0.022 (2) −0.003 (3) 0.004 (2) −0.005 (2)

C3 0.078 (5) 0.123 (7) 0.035 (3) −0.037 (5) −0.004 (4) −0.012 (4)

C4 0.050 (4) 0.101 (6) 0.047 (4) −0.019 (4) −0.010 (3) −0.024 (4)

C5 0.029 (3) 0.042 (3) 0.038 (3) −0.008 (2) −0.005 (2) −0.001 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Fe1—O1 1.7510 (12) O2—C2 1.453 (5)

Fe1—Cl1i 2.2273 (14) C2—C3 1.463 (8)

Fe1—Cl1 2.2273 (14) C2—H2A 0.9900

Fe1—Cl1ii 2.2273 (14) C2—H2B 0.9900

O1—Fe1iii 1.7510 (12) C3—C4 1.422 (9)

Fe2—O2iv 2.171 (3) C3—H3A 0.9900

(5)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m216–m217

Fe2—O2v 2.171 (3) C4—C5 1.492 (7)

Fe2—O2vi 2.171 (3) C4—H4A 0.9900

Fe2—O2vii 2.171 (3) C4—H4B 0.9900

Fe2—O2viii 2.171 (3) C5—H5A 0.9900

O2—C5 1.452 (5) C5—H5B 0.9900

O1—Fe1—Cl1i 110.55 (5) O2—C2—C3 104.9 (4)

O1—Fe1—Cl1 110.54 (5) O2—C2—H2A 110.8

Cl1i—Fe1—Cl1 108.38 (5) C3—C2—H2A 110.8

O1—Fe1—Cl1ii 110.54 (5) O2—C2—H2B 110.8

Cl1i—Fe1—Cl1ii 108.38 (5) C3—C2—H2B 110.8

Cl1—Fe1—Cl1ii 108.38 (5) H2A—C2—H2B 108.9

Fe1iii—O1—Fe1 180.0 C4—C3—C2 109.0 (5)

O2iv—Fe2—O2 180.00 (14) C4—C3—H3A 109.9

O2iv—Fe2—O2v 90.44 (11) C2—C3—H3A 109.9

O2—Fe2—O2v 89.56 (11) C4—C3—H3B 109.9

O2iv—Fe2—O2vi 89.57 (11) C2—C3—H3B 109.9

O2—Fe2—O2vi 90.44 (11) H3A—C3—H3B 108.3

O2v—Fe2—O2vi 89.57 (11) C3—C4—C5 106.7 (5)

O2iv—Fe2—O2vii 90.43 (11) C3—C4—H4A 110.4

O2—Fe2—O2vii 89.57 (11) C5—C4—H4A 110.4

O2v—Fe2—O2vii 90.43 (11) C3—C4—H4B 110.4

O2vi—Fe2—O2vii 180.0 C5—C4—H4B 110.4

O2iv—Fe2—O2viii 89.56 (11) H4A—C4—H4B 108.6

O2—Fe2—O2viii 90.44 (11) O2—C5—C4 106.3 (4)

O2v—Fe2—O2viii 179.998 (1) O2—C5—H5A 110.5

O2vi—Fe2—O2viii 90.43 (11) C4—C5—H5A 110.5

O2vii—Fe2—O2viii 89.57 (11) O2—C5—H5B 110.5

C5—O2—C2 108.7 (3) C4—C5—H5B 110.5

C5—O2—Fe2 126.5 (3) H5A—C5—H5B 108.7

C2—O2—Fe2 124.7 (3)

O2vi—Fe2—O2—C5 −173.4 (4) C5—O2—C2—C3 18.8 (6)

O2vii—Fe2—O2—C5 6.6 (4) Fe2—O2—C2—C3 −158.5 (4)

O2viii—Fe2—O2—C5 96.1 (4) O2—C2—C3—C4 −21.5 (8)

O2iv—Fe2—O2—C2 −160 (5) C2—C3—C4—C5 15.7 (9)

O2v—Fe2—O2—C2 93.0 (3) C2—O2—C5—C4 −9.6 (6)

O2vi—Fe2—O2—C2 3.4 (3) Fe2—O2—C5—C4 167.7 (4)

O2vii—Fe2—O2—C2 −176.6 (3) C3—C4—C5—O2 −3.8 (8)

O2viii—Fe2—O2—C2 −87.0 (3)

References

Related documents

The optimized MWPA was concentrated and extracted using ethyl acetate and was further determined for its antimicrobial properties against Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial

There are infinitely many principles of justice (conclusion). 24 “These, Socrates, said Parmenides, are a few, and only a few of the difficulties in which we are involved if

The ethno botanical efficacy of various parts like leaf, fruit, stem, flower and root of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts against various clinically

The main research question is as follows: ‘ Is it feasible to design a randomised controlled trial that will assess if the Shape-up following cancer treatment programme is

Section 1. Th e ABC County Citizen Review Panel is a federally mandated group of professionals and private citizens who are responsible for determining whether state and

Consistent with the predominantly nuclear MRTF-A, the three aggressive lines (UACC-257, SK-Mel-147, and SK-Mel-103) have dramatically increased expression of these

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. 1–3 In Japan, the preva- lence of T2DM