American Journal
of
Computational Linguistics
~ i c r o f i c h e 33 : 6 3A r t i f i c i a l I n t e l l i g e n c e C e n t e r S t a n f o r d R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e Men10 P a r k , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 0 2 5
ABSTRACT
8atur.l languag8 o u t p u t can b* generatrd fram remantic nets by ptoc*rsing ternplats8 asroeiated with concept# in the n e t r A # q t a t v e r b teaplater i s belng derived from a Study o f t h e
surfrc9 syntax o f ran@ 3000 Englirh V e r b 8 8 f h e actlve forms of
t h e verb$ have b e e n t Z ~ r r i f l s d rtcorb&n$ t o s u b j e c t r o b j e e t C m 1 ~ and compl~aent(r1) there Syntactic P a t t e r n s , augmented w i t h case n a m s , ara used as a grammat t o Cantrol th4 generation O t t e x t , Thlr text
in
turn
i s p a s r a d through a speech syntheri8 programand output by 4 V O T R A X speech rynth4o&zax, ThLr analyrar r h o u l d
ultimately benefit s y s t e m s a t t s a p t l n g t o understand E r l ~ l i ~ h i n p u t
by p r a v i d i n g surface e t r u c t u r s t o d e e p c u l i t r u e t u r d maps using the rare trmpirter r r e m p 1 Q y t d b y t h e generator.
T h f r
reararch
w4r rupportrd by t h e Detenra Advaneed Reuearch Proleeta Agancy a f th* Dcprrtmmnt @ t D ~ f e n r e and m a n i t 6 r r d by t h eTNTRQDUCTXON
It
c o m p u t e r 6 r t r t ocanmonicrtr
e f t r e t l v c l y w i t h p e o p l e ,t h e y nust spark,
or
a ti r a r t
w r i t e , t h eurcr*r
nrtur61
Language,The b u l k o t the work
in
c o ~ p y t a t l o n r l
L l n g u i l t i c r h a s b e e nd r v o t r d t o computer
undcrstandlnq
o fn a t u t a l
language i n p u t # b u tr e l a t i v e l y l i t t i e
r t f o < r t
ha8 been e % p e n d @ d i n d e v e l o p i n $natural
Language o u t p u t . M o r t Enplirh o u t p u t
systems
h r v e been along t h el i n e
o f n f i l lIn
t h e blanku w i t h Perhap& soma semanticcenrtrrint6 i m p o r a d !
t h e r a
have bean few attempts a t l a n g u a g egeneration
from whatone
could
crLlwsamrntic
n e t R
s t r u c t u r e s[8g@aon8 and
8locua,
1972; Sloeuar 1973; Goldman, 1 9 7 4 1 ,PeFh&p@
generation
i s c a n r l d e r e d a mucha a s i s r
p r o b l e m , Theruccrrr o f
understanding
e f f o r t s
i r
generally b c l i s v t d t o d r p r n don rome warkrble
theory o fRdlrcaurrr
6rganlzatlonc
which w o u l drccbunt
gar affect8 o fcontext
andw o u l d
ahow how i n i p h o r i c~ ~ p r e n 8 l ~ n s
(pronoun#
and
noun
phrases)
are
r e s o l v e d
and how#rnt*nCeS
r r o
order84t n
t h e b U t P U t r A s t t h r p p d n o tthere
m@chanlr@r
are
p r ~ L # * l Ythose
t h a tr
w r r 8 p o n r eg ~ n e r r t o r ~
must
Incorporate
i t i t 1 s t oappear
Lntrlligent. Tha lrtudy o fqrnrtrtion
r i l l p l a yan
importantr o t s
in
r o l v i n g t h e p r o b l e m ofundrrttandino
i f i tern
draonrtrrte
& mapping t ~ o m d e r pramantic
rtrUctura6
t o r u t f a c er t r t n g r ,
b e t
ua
b r i e f l youtlina
g o m erelevant
preccrrrs
i n
t h e #peachunderstanding
system
b r i n g d r Y c L 0 ~ 1 d by 8RIand
SDC (Walker a ta1.t 1 9 1 5 ~
and
Rite.,
1915).The
urar
inltlatrs
rrrrton
by( i n p u t and o u t p u t )
is
manlter@d b y a Wdircaurae m a d u l a 8 ( D a u t a c b ,11975)
to
maintainr n
accurate ca~ntrerskition41 c o n t e x t , Ane x e e u t t v c
eserdinata#
v a r i a u r K n a r l a d g es a u x c o s
4 c W r t i ~ rp r o s o d i c , syntactic, r ~ m r n t i e , pzagmrtlc, and d i ~ e e u r r c t o
B u n d e r o t r n b w
c u c c e r s i v t utt@rane@rrThe analyzed U t t a F l n g e i Q then Pas8rB l a ZRa
"resPandarw
PBItllanother
eamponrnt
o f the d i l e a u r t c module. The r e s p o n d e r mayc a l l the
pucrtlonransrcrrr
i t t h e l n p u ti r
aq u e s t i o n !
i t mayc a l l
4 d a t a bead u p d a t eProgram
I t ths i n p u t i sr
otatcmant
o ffact1
or
i t may d r c l d r an r o m c o t h e r r p p r o p r i a t c r e p l y . Thacontent
ab t h e r@DpDnD@ I sp r r o r a
t o t h e g s n a r a t a r ~ p e r h a p a # i $ hS o m e
tndicrtian
of hsa i t is t o b e t a r m u l a t @ d s TRa r e p l y may b sa r t s r c a t y p s d rsrpsnss ( w y @ 8 B p
" n o M ,
"1 @e@C)Inoun
p h r a r s(nodel,
r
o@nt+nes
( v e r b n o d e ) r O r r e ~ ~ n t u 1 1 1 y ~ a paragraph,The q e n ~ P a Q ~ r o u t p u t s s t e t t o t y p e d r a s p a n r e g Pmmed$atslyt if!
t h e
rcrpanrr
i r
nor@
c o m p l i c a t e d [ a"nounB
nab@, * v e r b R nads, arrvcnturlly r
n r t w o r k ) ,
r
mbrr d e t a l l c d p r o p t a m i r ra g ulr c d. T h i sp r o g r a m
nbLl
dctrrmina exactly how t h e r e s p o n g e i s t s b sb o r m u l r t a d m a & g
N B I
61 O H t e q U I R C Q 8 f St! i t m a y bb ~ d ~ ~ l r 6 dt o Chooag V e r b @ and
noun@
w i t h w h i c h t o @ X g s @ @ @ t h e d e e p C l S c naec t r u c t u r r r ,
r r w a l l r8 a ryntaetlc from. f o r t h e genaration. Theg ~ n a r a t o r
P ~ O ~ U C I I thar r r p o n r r
in
w f r x t wform1
t h i rin
t u r n
i r
p & g s a d t o a B ~ O I C ~ t y n t h r l l r program
t a r
trrnrtarmatlon
a n dc u t p u t by
r
comn@rCial
VOTRAX r p r a c h r y n t h e ~ i z a r . C u r r ~ n t l yno
IsntQner
intenstion
sr
r t r ~ a s
c o n % s W i n g i~ b e i n g p @ r t ~ r m e d ,f u r t h e r r e f e r e n c e t o t h e s y n f h c r l g r t r p r i l l b e m e d e n
CQNSTRAXNTS Or? R E S P O N D I N G
T h e r e a r e s e v e r a l c e n s L d c r 8 t i a n r i n v o l v e d in r e s p o n d i n g
a p p r o p r i a t e b y t o an utterance. F i r s t , t h e r c a r e *conver:ctlanal
P o ~ t U l & t e # " (Gordon a n d Lakoff, 1 9 7 5 1 8 h a r s d b y t h e u 6 e r s a £ e
Lanuurprt
t h e r e p o t t u 2 a t e r s e r v e t o c a n s t r a i n t h e c o n t e n t a n df o r m
o fc a ~ ~ u n i c a t i o n r
from t h e speaker t o t h e h e e r a r e For i n s t a n c e , t h e r p e r k e r s h o u l d n o t t a l l t h e h e a r e r r e ~ s t h i n g t h e hearer all@&dy knows, l c r t h e b e b o r e 6 1 y e t t h e s p e a k e r c a n n o t t e l l t h e h c a r e r s a m e t h i n g t h e h e a r e r k n o w s a b ~ o l u t e l y n a t h l n qabout, or t h e hearer r l l l n o t c o m p r e h e n d . T h e ggenkee c h o u l d
r e l a t e k n t
n c w a
i n h i s marsaga t o t h e p r t o r k n o w l e d g s o f t h eh e a r e r ; t h i s r e q u i r e s t h e r p e r k c r t e h a v e ti m o d e l of! t h e h a a r c f
There h e u r i s t i c 6 m u r t o p e r a t e in c a n j u n c t b o n w ~ t h c w ~ ~ c ~ ~ n c ~
p r o d u c e r w
t oconstrain
what m a y b e o u t p u t b y a q ~ e n t c n c e ng e n e r a t o r e
Wea r e
only b e g i n n i n g t o u n d e r s t a n G h o w t o l n c o r p a r r t t t h e r e p a r t u i a t e r in a l a n g u a g c g r o c e 6 ~ b n g k y g t c m ,Then t h e r e
Is
t h e matter o f c o n 8 t r u c t l n g the b a t i c s e n t e n c eN o r m a l E n g l i s h r y n t a x r c q u i r r r a t l t a a t a n t v e r b I n t h e s a n t c n c a f
c h o o r i n g a mrln v e r b constrains the r u r f d c t R t r u c t u r e , F o r
inltrncer i n t h r r b l c n c r of campounds a n y v e r b s o t h e r t h a n t h e
main v w b w i l l have t o a p p e a r i n a n o t h e r Fornr nominal,
i n f i n i t i v e ,
g e r u n d r p ~ r t L c I p L @ ~or
s u b o r d i n a t e C f a u c e , H o w d a e ct h e r e l e v a n t f n f a r m a t l o n c e n t a i n t d I n & g e m e n t i c n e t I n d i c a t e t h a
r p p r o p r l a t e farm? The t r a d i t l o n d l a n s w e r
I s
" b y m e a n n o f t h tlexicon
and r d v s n c e a methodologyf a r
r a p r e l c n t l n g a m a p tramd e e p c a s e
s t r u c t u r a
t asurface
s t r u c t u r e ,
Thlr prgrr ~ O C U L I I an a p h i l o s o p h y o t s L n g l a m 6 c n f e n c r
farmattinqr
cmeaaing
amain
vatbr choosingt n a
g r a s s
s t r u c t u r e
s tt h e o u t p u t scntencer and deciding how t o generate s p g r o p r i a t a
noun
p h r a r a s ,Qur
exarnpl~a willanB1oY
l i m P l i f i a 4semantic
n e tr t r u e t u r r r , remcrhat
liket h o s e
i n t h e a c t u a l 5 R I ~ a a r t i t i a n a dB l a r n t P ~
n e t a
8 y s t a mlHandrlxr
1 9 7 5 1 , MMesIn
t h enet
mayr a p r e r a n t
p h y l i c r l objects, rcllttonshipr, evantr, s b t r , r u l a s ,a r
u t t s r e n c e s r a0i n
t h e Q x e m p l a b a l a w , D i r e c t a d l a b @ P l e d aregconncct n s d a a and r s p r a s a n t c e r t a i n w p r i m i % i r a n tlmc-invariant
r a l a t t s n r h t p a ,
In
t h e n @ tL r r q m ~ n t
above, t h e U.8. an4 t h r U , K . r r a elcmrntl ( a )in
OWNLng r l f u r t i o n l l n v o l v l n p as O B J l c t r p a r t i c u l a r r u b m a r i n e r )reeh
r u b m a r l n t 11 an rlcmsnt o f s a m e c l a s s o t s u b m & r 1 n t s rr n d
t e ~ p l a f e s f a t Engllah rtntcner8, Bc c h o a ~ e a s i m p l e verb f o r dernmstrrtfin a = OWN, W a
not@
t h a t our v e r b h $ @ v & t & 1VynanymrRr W A V E , POSSESS, and BELONG C10L S l m c c l f h of t h c s c
v e r b 8 (including OWN1 ha8 o t h e r Ssnsr meanings, r e D a r l t a n o d e
tense
t h e y havein
Comment this node w i l l b e & h a m ~ r o t o t y p Z c r l EOWHI
in
t h s tIt
w 1 1 2incarpareta
t h eu m s r n i n ~ R
of t h e a l t u a t l s nand
Ln
t h a t allinaerncrs
a f owning r i t u a t i a n s w i l l b 4 r e r a t ~ d P QP O S S E S S t HIVEI
BELONG] and
trmplatrr, Wsts t h a t one t e m p l a t er i l l
h a t r u f f t e a Ear a l l dour v e r b s ;For
inatanesr t h e s u b j e c t 0 %t h e subject i r t h e FXPeriencQsr
EXP
own&
OBJ 1 0BJ i sowned
b y EXPEXP p o r o a s s ~ a OBJ OBJ 1 s P a b l @ l l d d b y E X B EXP h r r aBJ OBJ G d r o n v t o EXP
tOWK
(EXP
V&ctOBJ)
(OBJ V p r r B Y E X D ] )[PO3SES8 (EX$ Yact OBJ) (063 Ypar B Y E X P I ]
f H A V E (EXP Vact OBJ)] IBEbON6 (084 V a c t T O EXP)]
t % d W r BELONG)
and
an a g ~ o e 1 a t e d t e m p l a t e (OBJ VaeE T O EXPI, andBut we have 4 p r o b l e m !
t h e r e
i s no indication o f how t h o EXP and OBd Qrgumcntt &re t o b e generated, NP w i l l not alwaysr o f t i c r r note f o r inrtanec t h a t t h e p r e d i c a t e argument o f
in %?shn hapad t o go h o m e n must b a an Infinltlva P h P 4 8 e ( r a t h e r than the QetUfid p h r r e e t h a t NP m i g h t p r o d u c a l , Even a c u r s o r y
8 t U d Y o f a few h u n d r e d
verbs
in
t h @ language s h a w l that t h e y have very defintts Cand r e g u l a r 1 C o n s t t a i n t &on
t h e syntactic form 0 %tnrrr
canststucntr, T h a a s c o n s t r a i n t 8 appear ts b c m a t t e r s% o r
t h e
lexicon
r r t h a r than t h e grammar, we a s s o c i a t enet) r a t h e r t h a n imwemsnt them
v i a
QP4MmBF TUI~II and w g cxpllcltlyincorporate
t h s conrtltutnt t y p e sin
t h e t a m p l a t c s tCOWM
((NP
EXP) V a ~ t (NP OBJ)) (CNP OBJ)Ypar
BY (NP EXP))I(POSSES6 ((NP
EXP)
V a c t(NP
OBJ)) ((NP O B J ) Vpe8 BY (NP EXP))][HAVE
((HP
EXPI
Vact (NP OBJ))][BELONG ((NP OBJ] Yaet TO (NP
EXP))I
A a c t
o f
p a t t e r n s liLe t h t r a i s a s s o c i a t e d * I t h r v s r y " P I O ~ ~ Y P . v e r b n nodsin
t h e k n s w Z ~ d g @ b r a @ * $t w o u l d s e a m thatm l l r a need i s an P n t n r g s e b r t k a b g i v ~ n any w ~ e ~ b i n s t a n c e R
node fn t h e knowb@dg@ b ~ g e r l 0 b k o up t h e p s t t b r n s P Q T t h a t t y p e of! n o d h C ~ O Q G Q ~ Q V Q t b r 1 e O r r a a p d n d i n g tsmglate
f o r
t h e v e r b @and t h e n P r o e a e d r t s * e v r l u a t a n f h a p a t t e r n o
v e r b
[ O W N , S - 3 8 , D W N I sms b Q l ~ n $tamp [(MP OBJ) Vact TQ (NP EXpll
(NP
Odd) 913 t h e S ~ a w o L f Y I C ~ -13 B c l o n q sT O --3 t o
B u t
us
t t l i lr u n
i n t ot r o u b l e
w i t ho u r
r i m p l c cchema,Consldsr
t h erent@ncc,
*John b u r n e d thet a a r f
b l a c k , "\
ACT
\ ~ B Jcolorl
By u g i n g t h e simple p a t t e r n U N P AGT) Vact (HP O B J I ) we c o u l d e a s i l y generate t h e
* L n c o r r r c t w
sentence,
rJahn burned t h e b l a c ktmr;trW
since
(NP QBJ) might include thecolor
o f t h e t e 8 l t t 8 Meneed a
p a t t e r n
m o r e
llke((NP
AG,T) Vact [NPO W )
( n o d R ~ S I I IZn
w h i c h t h e RESult of t h e a c t i o n w f l k b c d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d t o t h e
verb. Ha*rvcrr t h l r 1%
n o t
q u i t e enough a = rt l a a r t , n o t W t t h o u ta
very
c0mpfic.tad Lntcrpretcr -*because
t h e i n t e r p r e t e rm u s t
RnoW t h a t (NF OBJ)
cannot
i n e l u d e h a v r a b P s RE8 ergurnawl[ b l a c k ) .
Thus#
byconvention,
nay
indicate
an
e x t r a
argumentt o bs Passed t o r
eon6tttuant
q a n s r d o r
(such as t h eOunetisn
NP)t e denote the
item(@)
not
t eappear
in
t h eresultant
canrtiturnta
( I N P ACT) Vact (HP OBJ RES) (Nod RES))
*he
pattern
(NP
OBJ RES)mrrnr
Vgrnaratr
an NP u s i n g t h e O B J s c tof
t h e VQrbr b u t don ~ t
i n e l u d e
t h a RESult of t h s v e r b in t h ep a t t a r n o ( L e e r a
p a t t e r n
copy f a re v e r y
p o r r / b l r *mmlrrLngflconstituent),
Thisl e v e l
o f detail w o u l d b eunrdasonable
i d f @ w o t h e r verbs c o u l d we t h i s template; however,there
a r e rnt?t@ khanrstrtlvaly
fewtern~lrtarr
baCh s h w ~ d b yseveral
t a n g BB h u n d r e d @There?
rrr
otherr o u r e q r
o t potantla1 p a t t e r np r o l t f a r a t i ~ n ~
an i m p a t t a n t
one
being t h e c a m b i n d t o r i a l arrangamants o f CQeaarguments
o f t i m e ,manner,
and a t h a r s u c h ~ B ~ W b i ~ l l r &it well aaother ( p o t 8 i b l Y
non*advrrbiall
ease arguments such assourer,
$ 0 4 1 ,
inttrumrnt,
e t c . Some a t $ha@@ a r g u m a ~ t d a r e r a t h @ rcenstralnsd
I n
t h e i r p a a i t i o n ain
t h erantencar
b u t o t h e r s may"esterday t h e s h i p
satled
f r o m t h e l i g h t h o u s e t o t h e d o c k , ""The
# h i ps a i l r d
f r o m
t h s
lighthau8a t o t h e dock yesterday." wYast@rday t h e s h i p r a i l e d t o t h e dock from t h e l l g h t h o u r ~ . ~g t i s a f c a u a r a
unrsrranabl@
t a t r y t omaintain
a l l t h e ~ a s 8 i b X ep r f t r r n r ! Lnefcad r s
leave
Lnrsrtlon o f f h r t e r d v c r b i a frrguncntr
t o r ring11 heuristic
routine
( d c r e r i b c d below), There arerrvcral
jurtitlcations f o r t h j l , amanp them8 t i ) t h e p a r t i c u l a rfarm 09 t h e
verb
cannot
b e grneobatsd u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t b b j e c t ( a 5 )@ r ~ r t @ L
p o s s i b l eP L & C I ~ ~
and ( 3 1 t h e t ar t a
someheuristic
one
mayquestion
whether passive t e n p l a t a o a h o u l d b e a t o r e 4 1c@tt@inlyr they c o u l d b e d e r i v e d r On t h e o t h e r hand, n e g l e c t i n g
t~
rtare
thorn woWdfarce
ur t o I n d % b a t @ wAtheach
Verb ( 8 4 n 0 3 ) ~whether Lt can
(or,
ronrtimar, m u s t ) be p a r r i v i z c d , I n d i c a t i n g" t r . n ~ l t l v @ V i r naf enough
since
there are tranritlvc vrrbr ( i . a , , vcrbr t h a t takaan
object) t h a tcannot
b c p s s s l v i z a d .8incs we hava t o r t o r a t h e information a n y w a y p we Can r a v e dame
There
arr
rtvsrrlrraronr
f o r g c n r r a f i n q t h e v e r b a f t e r t h emafor
@rgumentr. F t r ~ t t h e l u b j r e t a u a t b e p a n e r r f a d ro t h a t t h ev e r b
can
b rmrdc
t o a p r r ri n
nuabnr. S e c o n d , c e r t a i n rare t r n r r r8tr
t r u e o f
v r r b - p r r t i c l r conblnitionc rkiir n o t cL t h e i c o l a t r d v e r b ,Btncr,
in addition, prrticl@c
must a p p e a r r f t t r o b j e c t 8t h a t F S h o r t (like
p r a n o w n r l
b u t b s f ~ r s a b j a e t e t h a t a r e l o n g(like
noun
phraras), t h e p a r t i c l e nurt b e p o s i t i o n a d a f t e r t h eo b j e c t j S
grncrrtcd.
F f n a L 1 ~ 1i n o c r t i a n
a f soma a d v a r b i r b rt r . ~ ,
annot"rrqulrrr
an r u x l l i r r y v e r b I- t h u g v e r b g r n a r a t l o naurt
fotlor r d v r r b i r l grncratlon,
VERB PATTERNS
T h i s #tudy s t a r t e d with t h e 25 V e r b p a t t c r n r " p r c r c n t c d b y
Hornby ( 1 9 5 4 ) . T h e ~ e
Ln
t u r n
crwr f r o m a d l c t g o n a r y b y Hornby c tel.,
( 1 9 4 8 ) . V c t M in t h e dict$onary &re c Z & i r l t i r d & c ~ o r d i n g t a t h e i r g r o s ssyntactic
p r t t r r n ~ a f l u b j r c t p a b j r c t ( s 1 , endc o m ~ ~ r a e n t C s ) ~
most
o t t h e ~ a f t q r n r r r a r u b - d l v g d a d e Thc rutkorrcl@La
t h a tthere
p a t f r r n r WXXNnt f o r a l lconttruetlanr
i n v o l v i n g& I & t h e
verbs
I n t h e L r 4 i e t i a n a r y d n d r b y N t t n e f o n ,I n
t h eIangUagr, I tl&SrifiertLon i s n o t Z m m c d i & t e l Y u s e f u l t o
C ~ t h p U t d h t i ~ n a l l i n g u l r t r r l n c a i t d o a s not a d d r a g s u n d e r l y i n g
~ e m a a t i c s ~
H a v a t k h e l e ~ ~ ~ i t $ r c l a r r t h a t i t can ssrve ae t h sb r r l r
f o r
r&artvatIan
o l
U n d @ r l Y l n g c a r r r t r u c t u h a rprrtlculatly, &r a bar16 f o r Vplnrrrtion t c n g l & t r o , *
There pattern8
&re
b @ l n g c a n v a r t a d i n t a t a m p l e t @ @ much llkttho#* d e r i v e d
a r r l f e t r
t h a t n r l y r i s i s B a i n g p e r f a r m e d w i t ha p p e a r ) , There t e m p l a t e a s e r v e ro t h o major portion o f a m o d u l a r *gan@ratLon g r a m m a r r * w i t h t h e
r@aarlnder
in
t h r farm o f h s u t i a ; t i ctunctianr
t o r c o n s t r u c t i n g syntactic constituentr,N O U N PHRASES
What t o I n c l u B b
Ln
anoun
phrase should b e anothermrttar
f a r
t h e d i r c a u r t e module t o j u d g e , There areno
w ~ 1 l ~ E a r m ~ l a C a df u l r l
eccountlng
f a r
anaphorlIn
EngliShj i n d e a d , there a r ct r w
w s f l e e 8 t r b l i e h a d parameters a t h e r than t h a t %ha hearer m u s t b a
a b l e t o r ~ a a l v a t h o (pto)nouns t o t h e i r r e f o r a n t s , T h e &D@ak@a?p
S h o u l d t m p l o y anaphoxa
In
order t o a v o l a t @ p e t i t l o n r b u t o n l y P t h i s B0deX of! t h e hearer i n d i c r t o ~ t h a t t h e ~ ~ Q P C P can t d s o l v d t h ea m b i g u i t y , Thcrc
arc
same lawcpowrr ptaneminalization r u l e r t h a t could be d i r e c t l y i n c a r p 0 r a t s d in a generator r a f g @ x $ v % z a l P a n rf o r
s ~ 1 1 p 1 0 . N c V ~ P ~ ~ B ~ ~ S S ~ f tIS
i m p a s t a n t L OP ~ B Z I Z B
that Whenr
generator
i r
unaware
o f t h ee a n v c r t a f l ~ n a l
context, it l h a u l dnot indepsndantLy d e c i d e haw t o ganaratr
noun
p h p a 1 4 8 1 I t CQRonly d e c i d e when t o d6
r o e
T h i s r b t u a t l o n har not been u n i v + r o a l L y r @ c a q n f i e d r b u t I t 1 s becoming hnercarlngZY c l e a rt h r t a Q Z ~ c s u r t e m s d u h
m u s t
b e c a n r u b t s d d u r i n g t h e ~ s n a r r t l a n p h r r s . The d i r e o u r r e modal. w i l l not know ahead of timr what NPIare
% O b e p r ~ d u e @ d u n ~ @ s g $t p4rforrn\@ many o f ths g e m @ ~ P o r a t i a n a t h a t t h e paneratar w o u l d d o anyr4y. Y a t t h e cantcxt-8cnritivo d e c i r i o n s t r r t ~ g ~ may h . v e t o r e s o r b ts r u s h m a a r u t b r a r d l a e w b $ q u a t i n g t h e p r o p o r r b o u t p u t u o L w g khs model of &he hrsrerin
order t a d ~ t e r m b n r what rnaphdra if4t e s e a v a b l a ,
t %
I rf o r rany
rrrsonr
i t nurt b e p a r t o f t h e d l r c o u r r r m o d u l c ,T h e r e f a t e t h r g e n r r r t o r S h o u l d p a 6 S a n y R n c u n U c o n s t i t u c n t
t o t h @ dJscourre m o d u l e ( p l r h s p t r i t h i t s r r c o m m c n d a t i o n a b o u t
how t o P I g d U c e the c o n s t i t u e n t , ; t h n o d u l e ~ m u s t d c t c r m i n r i f a
p r o n o u n
or
b & g an o u n
i t ambiguour t o t h e h e a r e r , a n d , i f s o , w h a tt o add t o t h e n o u n ln order t o makt t h e d e s i r e d r e f e r e n t e l e a r ,
Ln
thecurrent
SRI s y s t e m ,n o u n
p r t t c r n r [ S l o c u m , t a r p P c a r ) a r aU S I ~ t o
control
noun
phrasegrnrrrtian,
Much l i k e v e r b p a t t e r n s ,noun
p r t t c r n r order t h e ~ o n ~ t l f u @ n t 8 i n t h e p h r a r r a n d i n d i c a t ehow
each
eon8tLturnf Is t o b e generated b y naming a f u n c t i c n t ob e Called w i t h t h e
nQtwerK
~ a n s t f t u e n t f
((DET]
[Ad3 QUA&) ( A d j SIZE) ( A d j SHRFE) ( A d 1 C O L O R ) (N)]Batttrhr like t h i r
e r a
d i r t r i b u t r d a b o u t t h e network h i @ r @ r e h y jin
t h e f u t u r e @ t h @ Q L ~ c ~ u r r c aadulc r i l l dccLde t o r e a c h p q t t r r nconstituent
whather f t i 8 t o appear i n t h e p h r r c s ,MEURZSTXC RULES
R ~ r n b y d+rcrlb@r t h r e e b s r l c p o r l t l a n r f a r a d v c r b r in t h e
clrussr
"rentff
pa#b$tionp R ~ t d n pssltlonr and @ a n d u ~ e r i t l o n ~Front
poritgen r d v r r b roccur
b a t a r e
t h e s u b j r c t t w V e r t a ~ d a y h @want
hornat from these ha t o o k a t a x i , * The i n t o r r o q l t i w a r d v a r b r(a,g,
now,
when?r r r
t y p i c a l l y c o n s t r d k n ~ d t ofront
P o o i t i o n lo t h e r 8 miy r p p r r t t h r r r t a t p u r p o r r r o f r m p h a r l a
cr
e a n t r a l t .M i d p e r l e i o n
r d v a r b a
occur
v i r h t h e v e r b ( a t r i n g l t Sf t h e r ear*
medals r
ru#ilLrrv
v a r h r s
t h e dbvrrlsoccurs
a f t o r t h e f i r s tone,
Oth@twi8r the r d ~ ~ r bw ~ L L
appear b t k ~ r @ t h e V e r b l cxcaptt h a r a r l @ o h @ if8 t y p i ~ l l l y buw8] *he I t 1 t 1 1 I waiting,@
End p o s i t i o n a d v e r b s
occur
r t t r r
t h e v e r b anda f t e r
anyd b t e e t or indirect object pteacnt, While t a l a t i v ~ l y f e n
clrurss
have mare t h r h
one
a d V Q r bi n
tront parttianor
mara
t h r nsns
In
@ i d
porltianr
i t i rcommon
t a t r r v c r r l .dV@rbS t o appearin
and~ a r l t l o n
in
t h arams
c l a u s a l * t h a V p l a y t h eP i a n a
PeerlY
t a g c t h r r w ,
h d v a r b l r l r
o ft i m e
(rnrrrring
t h e 4uartiont w r h @ n ? w ) usuallyd e e u t
in a n d
p o a l t i o n ,
b u t may appearIn grsnt
p o s i t i o n
f a r
aaphrrtr
or
contrast.
k d v e r b i a l r o f frequency (anrwsrlng t k aquettbon, wRaw ~ f t a n ? ~ l
can
b e s p l i ti n Q
t w o g r o u p s , The f i r s tgroup is comgo@@d ~f ringla-nerd a d v e r b s t h a t t y a l c a l l y s e e u i fn
& i d porition b u t a I r o may b r
in
i n d p a t L t i a n j t h @ s a c a n d i r eosparsd a $ m u l t i p l s = w o r d phrrrrr t h a t dgp&ar Pn end p a r i t i o ne r ~
&err L r r 9 U r n t l Y r
in
t r e n t
Position. A d v e r b s of duration [ V l f ~ r lhew
lonqtw)
u d u ~ l l yhave end
parltlan,
wbth %song p6sBtPonf b r
empha8fs
or
csntxartr Adverb8 o f p l a c e and d i r a e t l e n narrnall~hivQ and
porition.
A d v c r b r o f 4 r g r c a and manner h a v e m i d o r and~ O S I ~ L Q R I
d e p b n d i n gon
t h r a d v a r b ,Along W i t h r u a h r u l e r c o n ~ ~ r n l n g t h e B a r L t i o n r O L Vsriout t y p e s o f a d v r r b r ,
t h e r e
murt b r a mcchanirm t o 0rd.f t h e r d v c r b r t h a t arr L as ~ c u r
In
t h a "maQn p e t i t L o n , T h r r rr r a
e o m eh @ u a l r t i c l ~ among rdverbi.11 o f
t i m e
Car
p l a ~ 1 1 t h e s m a l l a tunit
81 u r u r l l y pL4ccb
t l r l t ,
u n l r r l i tt r
44604 4 8 &R s f t a r t h a u p h t lusually precede t h o r e
of
f r e q u e n c y , w h i c h i nt u r n
p r a e o d e t h o o ~ a t time,T h e r e r u l e 8 r e i a p l r m o n t s d in th@ raRr
r a u t L n ~
M a t produce@ t h e v e r b 1 when @ t e m p l a t e i s f i r a t f n e a r p r c k e d =- N W heo B 8 e q u e n c c o f
function
e r l l r t h e R V a ~ t w o r "Vpao k a y a a r clonored.
once
t h e l U b j C C t , ~ b j C C t ( S 1 a n d c o m p l t m c n t ( a ) l n d i c r t r dby t h e
t c n p l r t r
rrr
O a n r r r f r d r t h i s* c l e a n
u p mr o u t i n e
$ 6 c a l l e d . Et employg the h a u x i t t i e k d ~ r c r f b e d a b a v a L a a d d t h e a d v e r b i a l C ~ r t & t f t U @ n t & and V h F b r t h e n concatsnatss t h e c a n s t b t u t n t s t aproduce
r
complete@IruseI
DXSCUSSTON
f n
theory, t h e s e t o f p o r s i b l c E n p L l r h r a n t c n c r s i ai n f fnZtsr Tha o b v l a o r q u s a t l b n m a n
~ t @ @ @ r
O l fsne
t r i e s t oaccount
ror t h e m with t a r n p l i t r r rwon
t t h e r e b c an i n f i n i t en u m b e r eL
t a a p l a t t ~ ? ~ The s i m p l e antxcr i r r "Nor t o r romc of t h eSam@
r e l l ~ n l
t h a tallow
a f i n i t e grammar t o g c n r r a t a an i n t l n i t en u m b e r
of
itr2ngr.R One can p r e d u c a r a n t r n c e r o f a r b i t r a r y L e n g t hby ( 1 ) ~ T ' b l t t ' a t ~ a n b @ d d l n g r and ( 2 1 a r b i t r a r y c o n j u n c t t a n @ Caw@
B o t o not do s o b y includdng a r b i t r a r y n u m b e r s sf d i s t i n c t c a r @
erpuacntl. Evrn r a t h e numbcr o t b a s i c p a t t e r n s c o u l d b e t n l ~ a m e l Y I a f gc
,
E v i d r n c a , horevrrr i l t c t h e c o n t r a r y ! t h el V e n t U I I nUnbqr o f [email protected]@# w o u l d appear t o b r r e v e r a l t i m e 8 t h e
number O I p l t t e r n r ~ a w i n g t o t h r S U b l t i t U t i o n o f p a r t t c u l a r
p r a ~ a r i t l o n e
Ear
n p r ~ p wIn
t h e r ~ ~ t i c t l c attaro or, a n d t h aarrlgnaent
o t dltfetent c r l e nancr t o a p a r t i c u l a r canstitusntDcotsch,
Barbara
G, EstablishingContext
in
Task-Orientedb l a l d g ~ .
Prrrcnted
a tt h e
ThirteenthAnnual
Meeting o t t h eAtsooiatian
f a tComputational
Llngutrflcr,
Barton,
M a ~ r a c h u ~ d t t ~ ,
S OOctober
* 1Navarnber
1 9 7 5 ,OoLdmrnr Neil
H eComputcr
G ~ n e r a t i o n o f
Natural L@nguagatram
aD I I ~
ConceptualI r r e .
A 1M e m o
2 4 7 , A r t i t i ~ i a lI n t e l l i g e n ~ ~
Laboratory, 8trnford Univcr8ityt S t r r n ford,
C q i f o r n i b 1974,
Gordon
D I v i d t
and
Lakaff, George.Convearettonal
Portulater.
Syntax s n dSenanticst
V o l u m e
3 1 S p e e c h A c t s , E d i t e d by Peter Cole and J e r r yL. Morganr
A c a d r m i aP r s a ~ ,
N e w Y g r k r1975 rn
H@ndtixt
Gary G. Expanding thr U t i l i t y o fBemantie
Nafworkr f hroughPact
i ttoning,
AdvancePav@r
r
o f t h eF o u r t h
Internationcl
J o h t
Contcrrncs
on A r t i f i c i a l
Z n t b l l l g e n e e , T b i i i o l r C s o r ~ i a ,U6SRl 3.8 G e p t a m b c r 1 9 7 5 , I I S a I Z l r
Hornby, 8 t r Gatrcby, V e t a n d W~lK@flb@Xdr H Q The Advmced
Laatnet@@
Dictionary
o fC u r r a n t
Engllrh. O x f o r dP r @ r r ~
London@ 1 9 4 8 ,
Rita.#
H, Barry,
Autoastic S p e e c hU n d e r r f a n d i n ~
SYrtamr.
Proessdlngr,
Eleventh
Annual
IEEE
Camputst S a e l e t yContcranea,
Harhlngton,
D.
C e r 9 - i 1 S ~ p t r m b e r 1 9 7 5 ,Siamanrr R o b t r t & I and S ~ O C U ~ ~
Jonathan.
Gaa@rartinqEnglish
Dlrcourcr
f r o m
Senrntlc
N I E W O ~ K C . CommUnicstlonr ~t theACH, 1 9 9 2 , 1 s t 8 9 1 1 9 0 9 n
S J o c u l ,
Jonathan.
Q u a r t i o n
Anarrring v i a Csnanlcrl V e r b 8a n d Bsrnrnt
l c
Madcllat t C ~ n s r a t i n g %ngllrht r o w
t h e W O ~ Q ~ ,Technical
Report H t = i 3 tDepartment
a & Csapartrr bcbtawcar rUniveoritp
a t T a ~ a r ~ Austin@ Ttx.8,January
1 9 1 3 .$locum,
Jonathan,
Verb Patterns andNoun
P a t t a r n sI n
E n g l i ~ h t A C l & r