• No results found

Speech Generation from Semantic Nets

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Speech Generation from Semantic Nets"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

American Journal

of

Computational Linguistics

~ i c r o f i c h e 33 : 6 3

A r t i f i c i a l I n t e l l i g e n c e C e n t e r S t a n f o r d R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e Men10 P a r k , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 0 2 5

ABSTRACT

8atur.l languag8 o u t p u t can b* generatrd fram remantic nets by ptoc*rsing ternplats8 asroeiated with concept# in the n e t r A # q t a t v e r b teaplater i s belng derived from a Study o f t h e

surfrc9 syntax o f ran@ 3000 Englirh V e r b 8 8 f h e actlve forms of

t h e verb$ have b e e n t Z ~ r r i f l s d rtcorb&n$ t o s u b j e c t r o b j e e t C m 1 ~ and compl~aent(r1) there Syntactic P a t t e r n s , augmented w i t h case n a m s , ara used as a grammat t o Cantrol th4 generation O t t e x t , Thlr text

in

turn

i s p a s r a d through a speech syntheri8 program

and output by 4 V O T R A X speech rynth4o&zax, ThLr analyrar r h o u l d

ultimately benefit s y s t e m s a t t s a p t l n g t o understand E r l ~ l i ~ h i n p u t

by p r a v i d i n g surface e t r u c t u r s t o d e e p c u l i t r u e t u r d maps using the rare trmpirter r r e m p 1 Q y t d b y t h e generator.

T h f r

reararch

w4r rupportrd by t h e Detenra Advaneed Reuearch Proleeta Agancy a f th* Dcprrtmmnt @ t D ~ f e n r e and m a n i t 6 r r d by t h e

(2)

TNTRQDUCTXON

It

c o m p u t e r 6 r t r t o

canmonicrtr

e f t r e t l v c l y w i t h p e o p l e ,

t h e y nust spark,

or

a t

i r a r t

w r i t e , t h e

urcr*r

nrtur61

Language,

The b u l k o t the work

in

c o ~ p y t a t l o n r l

L l n g u i l t i c r h a s b e e n

d r v o t r d t o computer

undcrstandlnq

o f

n a t u t a l

language i n p u t # b u t

r e l a t i v e l y l i t t i e

r t f o < r t

ha8 been e % p e n d @ d i n d e v e l o p i n $

natural

Language o u t p u t . M o r t Enplirh o u t p u t

systems

h r v e been along t h e

l i n e

o f n f i l l

In

t h e blanku w i t h Perhap& soma semantic

cenrtrrint6 i m p o r a d !

t h e r a

have bean few attempts a t l a n g u a g e

generation

from what

one

could

crLl

wsamrntic

n e t R

s t r u c t u r e s

[8g@aon8 and

8locua,

1972; Sloeuar 1973; Goldman, 1 9 7 4 1 ,

PeFh&p@

generation

i s c a n r l d e r e d a much

a a s i s r

p r o b l e m , The

ruccrrr o f

understanding

e f f o r t s

i r

generally b c l i s v t d t o d r p r n d

on rome warkrble

theory o f

Rdlrcaurrr

6rganlzatlonc

which w o u l d

rccbunt

gar affect8 o f

context

and

w o u l d

ahow how i n i p h o r i c

~ ~ p r e n 8 l ~ n s

(pronoun#

and

noun

phrases)

are

r e s o l v e d

and how

#rnt*nCeS

r r o

order84

t n

t h e b U t P U t r A s t t h r p p d n o t

there

m@chanlr@r

are

p r ~ L # * l Y

those

t h a t

r

w r r 8 p o n r e

g ~ n e r r t o r ~

must

Incorporate

i t i t 1 s t o

appear

Lntrlligent. Tha lrtudy o f

qrnrtrtion

r i l l p l a y

an

important

r o t s

in

r o l v i n g t h e p r o b l e m of

undrrttandino

i f i t

ern

draonrtrrte

& mapping t ~ o m d e r p

ramantic

rtrUctura6

t o r u t f a c e

r t r t n g r ,

b e t

ua

b r i e f l y

outlina

g o m e

relevant

preccrrrs

i n

t h e #peach

understanding

system

b r i n g d r Y c L 0 ~ 1 d by 8RI

and

SDC (Walker a t

a1.t 1 9 1 5 ~

and

Rite.,

1915).

The

urar

inltlatrs

rrrrton

by

(3)

( i n p u t and o u t p u t )

is

manlter@d b y a Wdircaurae m a d u l a 8 ( D a u t a c b ,

11975)

to

maintain

r n

accurate ca~ntrerskition41 c o n t e x t , An

e x e e u t t v c

eserdinata#

v a r i a u r K n a r l a d g e

s a u x c o s

4 c W r t i ~ r

p r o s o d i c , syntactic, r ~ m r n t i e , pzagmrtlc, and d i ~ e e u r r c t o

B u n d e r o t r n b w

c u c c e r s i v t utt@rane@rr

The analyzed U t t a F l n g e i Q then Pas8rB l a ZRa

"resPandarw

PBItll

another

eamponrnt

o f the d i l e a u r t c module. The r e s p o n d e r may

c a l l the

pucrtlonransrcrrr

i t t h e l n p u t

i r

a

q u e s t i o n !

i t may

c a l l

4 d a t a bead u p d a t e

Program

I t ths i n p u t i s

r

otatcmant

o f

fact1

or

i t may d r c l d r an r o m c o t h e r r p p r o p r i a t c r e p l y . Tha

content

ab t h e r@DpDnD@ I s

p r r o r a

t o t h e g s n a r a t a r ~ p e r h a p a # i $ h

S o m e

tndicrtian

of hsa i t is t o b e t a r m u l a t @ d s TRa r e p l y may b s

a r t s r c a t y p s d rsrpsnss ( w y @ 8 B p

" n o M ,

"1 @e@C)I

noun

p h r a r s

(nodel,

r

o@nt+nes

( v e r b n o d e ) r O r r e ~ ~ n t u 1 1 1 y ~ a paragraph,

The q e n ~ P a Q ~ r o u t p u t s s t e t t o t y p e d r a s p a n r e g Pmmed$atslyt if!

t h e

rcrpanrr

i r

nor@

c o m p l i c a t e d [ a

"nounB

nab@, * v e r b R nads, ar

rvcnturlly r

n r t w o r k ) ,

r

mbrr d e t a l l c d p r o p t a m i r ra g ulr c d. T h i s

p r o g r a m

nbLl

dctrrmina exactly how t h e r e s p o n g e i s t s b s

b o r m u l r t a d m a & g

N B I

61 O H t e q U I R C Q 8 f St! i t m a y bb ~ d ~ ~ l r 6 d

t o Chooag V e r b @ and

noun@

w i t h w h i c h t o @ X g s @ @ @ t h e d e e p C l S c nae

c t r u c t u r r r ,

r r w a l l r8 a ryntaetlc from. f o r t h e genaration. The

g ~ n a r a t o r

P ~ O ~ U C I I tha

r r r p o n r r

in

w f r x t w

form1

t h i r

in

t u r n

i r

p & g s a d t o a B ~ O I C ~ t y n t h r l l r program

t a r

trrnrtarmatlon

a n d

c u t p u t by

r

comn@rCial

VOTRAX r p r a c h r y n t h e ~ i z a r . C u r r ~ n t l y

no

IsntQner

intenstion

sr

r t r ~ a s

c o n % s W i n g i~ b e i n g p @ r t ~ r m e d ,

(4)

f u r t h e r r e f e r e n c e t o t h e s y n f h c r l g r t r p r i l l b e m e d e n

CQNSTRAXNTS Or? R E S P O N D I N G

T h e r e a r e s e v e r a l c e n s L d c r 8 t i a n r i n v o l v e d in r e s p o n d i n g

a p p r o p r i a t e b y t o an utterance. F i r s t , t h e r c a r e *conver:ctlanal

P o ~ t U l & t e # " (Gordon a n d Lakoff, 1 9 7 5 1 8 h a r s d b y t h e u 6 e r s a £ e

Lanuurprt

t h e r e p o t t u 2 a t e r s e r v e t o c a n s t r a i n t h e c o n t e n t a n d

f o r m

o f

c a ~ ~ u n i c a t i o n r

from t h e speaker t o t h e h e e r a r e For i n s t a n c e , t h e r p e r k e r s h o u l d n o t t a l l t h e h e a r e r r e ~ s t h i n g t h e hearer all@&dy knows, l c r t h e b e b o r e 6 1 y e t t h e s p e a k e r c a n n o t t e l l t h e h c a r e r s a m e t h i n g t h e h e a r e r k n o w s a b ~ o l u t e l y n a t h l n q

about, or t h e hearer r l l l n o t c o m p r e h e n d . T h e ggenkee c h o u l d

r e l a t e k n t

n c w a

i n h i s marsaga t o t h e p r t o r k n o w l e d g s o f t h e

h e a r e r ; t h i s r e q u i r e s t h e r p e r k c r t e h a v e ti m o d e l of! t h e h a a r c f

There h e u r i s t i c 6 m u r t o p e r a t e in c a n j u n c t b o n w ~ t h c w ~ ~ c ~ ~ n c ~

p r o d u c e r w

t o

constrain

what m a y b e o u t p u t b y a q ~ e n t c n c e n

g e n e r a t o r e

We

a r e

only b e g i n n i n g t o u n d e r s t a n G h o w t o l n c o r p a r r t t t h e r e p a r t u i a t e r in a l a n g u a g c g r o c e 6 ~ b n g k y g t c m ,

Then t h e r e

Is

t h e matter o f c o n 8 t r u c t l n g the b a t i c s e n t e n c e

N o r m a l E n g l i s h r y n t a x r c q u i r r r a t l t a a t a n t v e r b I n t h e s a n t c n c a f

c h o o r i n g a mrln v e r b constrains the r u r f d c t R t r u c t u r e , F o r

inltrncer i n t h r r b l c n c r of campounds a n y v e r b s o t h e r t h a n t h e

main v w b w i l l have t o a p p e a r i n a n o t h e r Fornr nominal,

i n f i n i t i v e ,

g e r u n d r p ~ r t L c I p L @ ~

or

s u b o r d i n a t e C f a u c e , H o w d a e c

t h e r e l e v a n t f n f a r m a t l o n c e n t a i n t d I n & g e m e n t i c n e t I n d i c a t e t h a

r p p r o p r l a t e farm? The t r a d i t l o n d l a n s w e r

I s

" b y m e a n n o f t h t

(5)

lexicon

and r d v s n c e a methodology

f a r

r a p r e l c n t l n g a m a p tram

d e e p c a s e

s t r u c t u r a

t a

surface

s t r u c t u r e ,

Thlr prgrr ~ O C U L I I an a p h i l o s o p h y o t s L n g l a m 6 c n f e n c r

farmattinqr

cmeaaing

a

main

vatbr choosing

t n a

g r a s s

s t r u c t u r e

s t

t h e o u t p u t scntencer and deciding how t o generate s p g r o p r i a t a

noun

p h r a r a s ,

Qur

exarnpl~a will

anB1oY

l i m P l i f i a 4

semantic

n e t

r t r u e t u r r r , remcrhat

like

t h o s e

i n t h e a c t u a l 5 R I ~ a a r t i t i a n a d

B l a r n t P ~

n e t a

8 y s t a m

lHandrlxr

1 9 7 5 1 , MMes

In

t h e

net

may

r a p r e r a n t

p h y l i c r l objects, rcllttonshipr, evantr, s b t r , r u l a s ,

a r

u t t s r e n c e s r a0

i n

t h e Q x e m p l a b a l a w , D i r e c t a d l a b @ P l e d areg

conncct n s d a a and r s p r a s a n t c e r t a i n w p r i m i % i r a n tlmc-invariant

r a l a t t s n r h t p a ,

In

t h e n @ t

L r r q m ~ n t

above, t h e U.8. an4 t h r U , K . r r a elcmrntl ( a )

(6)

in

OWNLng r l f u r t i o n l l n v o l v l n p as O B J l c t r p a r t i c u l a r r u b m a r i n e r )

reeh

r u b m a r l n t 11 an rlcmsnt o f s a m e c l a s s o t s u b m & r 1 n t s r

r n d

t e ~ p l a f e s f a t Engllah rtntcner8, Bc c h o a ~ e a s i m p l e verb f o r dernmstrrtfin a = OWN, W a

not@

t h a t our v e r b h $ @ v & t & 1

VynanymrRr W A V E , POSSESS, and BELONG C10L S l m c c l f h of t h c s c

v e r b 8 (including OWN1 ha8 o t h e r Ssnsr meanings, r e D a r l t a n o d e

tense

t h e y have

in

Comment this node w i l l b e & h a m ~ r o t o t y p Z c r l E

OWHI

in

t h s t

It

w 1 1 2

incarpareta

t h e

u m s r n i n ~ R

of t h e a l t u a t l s n

and

Ln

t h a t all

inaerncrs

a f owning r i t u a t i a n s w i l l b 4 r e r a t ~ d P Q

P O S S E S S t HIVEI

BELONG] and

trmplatrr, Wsts t h a t one t e m p l a t e

r i l l

h a t r u f f t e a Ear a l l dour v e r b s ;

For

inatanesr t h e s u b j e c t 0 %

t h e subject i r t h e FXPeriencQsr

EXP

own&

OBJ 1 0BJ i s

owned

b y EXP

EXP p o r o a s s ~ a OBJ OBJ 1 s P a b l @ l l d d b y E X B EXP h r r aBJ OBJ G d r o n v t o EXP

tOWK

(EXP

V&ct

OBJ)

(OBJ V p r r B Y E X D ] )

[PO3SES8 (EX$ Yact OBJ) (063 Ypar B Y E X P I ]

f H A V E (EXP Vact OBJ)] IBEbON6 (084 V a c t T O EXP)]

(7)

t % d W r BELONG)

and

an a g ~ o e 1 a t e d t e m p l a t e (OBJ VaeE T O EXPI, and

But we have 4 p r o b l e m !

t h e r e

i s no indication o f how t h o EXP and OBd Qrgumcntt &re t o b e generated, NP w i l l not always

r o f t i c r r note f o r inrtanec t h a t t h e p r e d i c a t e argument o f

in %?shn hapad t o go h o m e n must b a an Infinltlva P h P 4 8 e ( r a t h e r than the QetUfid p h r r e e t h a t NP m i g h t p r o d u c a l , Even a c u r s o r y

8 t U d Y o f a few h u n d r e d

verbs

in

t h @ language s h a w l that t h e y have very defintts Cand r e g u l a r 1 C o n s t t a i n t &

on

t h e syntactic form 0 %

tnrrr

canststucntr, T h a a s c o n s t r a i n t 8 appear ts b c m a t t e r s

% o r

t h e

lexicon

r r t h a r than t h e grammar, we a s s o c i a t e

net) r a t h e r t h a n imwemsnt them

v i a

QP4MmBF TUI~II and w g cxpllcltly

incorporate

t h s conrtltutnt t y p e s

in

t h e t a m p l a t c s t

COWM

((NP

EXP) V a ~ t (NP OBJ)) (CNP OBJ)

Ypar

BY (NP EXP))I

(POSSES6 ((NP

EXP)

V a c t

(NP

OBJ)) ((NP O B J ) Vpe8 BY (NP EXP))]

[HAVE

((HP

EXPI

Vact (NP OBJ))]

[BELONG ((NP OBJ] Yaet TO (NP

EXP))I

A a c t

o f

p a t t e r n s liLe t h t r a i s a s s o c i a t e d * I t h r v s r y " P I O ~ ~ Y P . v e r b n nods

in

t h e k n s w Z ~ d g @ b r a @ * $t w o u l d s e a m that

m l l r a need i s an P n t n r g s e b r t k a b g i v ~ n any w ~ e ~ b i n s t a n c e R

node fn t h e knowb@dg@ b ~ g e r l 0 b k o up t h e p s t t b r n s P Q T t h a t t y p e of! n o d h C ~ O Q G Q ~ Q V Q t b r 1 e O r r a a p d n d i n g tsmglate

f o r

t h e v e r b @

and t h e n P r o e a e d r t s * e v r l u a t a n f h a p a t t e r n o

v e r b

[ O W N , S - 3 8 , D W N I sms b Q l ~ n $

tamp [(MP OBJ) Vact TQ (NP EXpll

(NP

Odd) 913 t h e S ~ a w o L f Y I C ~ -13 B c l o n q s

T O --3 t o

(8)

B u t

us

t t l i l

r u n

i n t o

t r o u b l e

w i t h

o u r

r i m p l c cchema,

Consldsr

t h e

rent@ncc,

*John b u r n e d the

t a a r f

b l a c k , "

\

ACT

\ ~ B J

colorl

By u g i n g t h e simple p a t t e r n U N P AGT) Vact (HP O B J I ) we c o u l d e a s i l y generate t h e

* L n c o r r r c t w

sentence,

rJahn burned t h e b l a c k

tmr;trW

since

(NP QBJ) might include the

color

o f t h e t e 8 l t t 8 Me

need a

p a t t e r n

m o r e

llke

((NP

AG,T) Vact [NP

O W )

( n o d R ~ S I I I

Zn

w h i c h t h e RESult of t h e a c t i o n w f l k b c d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d t o t h e

verb. Ha*rvcrr t h l r 1%

n o t

q u i t e enough a = rt l a a r t , n o t W t t h o u t

a

very

c0mpfic.tad Lntcrpretcr -*

because

t h e i n t e r p r e t e r

m u s t

RnoW t h a t (NF OBJ)

cannot

i n e l u d e h a v r a b P s RE8 ergurnawl

[ b l a c k ) .

Thus#

by

convention,

nay

indicate

an

e x t r a

argument

t o bs Passed t o r

eon6tttuant

q a n s r d o r

(such as t h e

Ounetisn

NP)

t e denote the

item(@)

not

t e

appear

in

t h e

resultant

canrtiturnta

( I N P ACT) Vact (HP OBJ RES) (Nod RES))

*he

pattern

(NP

OBJ RES)

mrrnr

Vgrnaratr

an NP u s i n g t h e O B J s c t

of

t h e VQrbr b u t do

n ~ t

i n e l u d e

t h a RESult of t h s v e r b in t h e

p a t t a r n o ( L e e r a

p a t t e r n

copy f a r

e v e r y

p o r r / b l r *mmlrrLngfl

constituent),

This

l e v e l

o f detail w o u l d b e

unrdasonable

i d f @ w o t h e r verbs c o u l d we t h i s template; however,

there

a r e rnt?t@ khan

rstrtlvaly

few

tern~lrtarr

baCh s h w ~ d b y

several

t a n g BB h u n d r e d @

(9)

There?

rrr

other

r o u r e q r

o t potantla1 p a t t e r n

p r o l t f a r a t i ~ n ~

an i m p a t t a n t

one

being t h e c a m b i n d t o r i a l arrangamants o f CQea

arguments

o f t i m e ,

manner,

and a t h a r s u c h ~ B ~ W b i ~ l l r &it well aa

other ( p o t 8 i b l Y

non*advrrbiall

ease arguments such as

sourer,

$ 0 4 1 ,

inttrumrnt,

e t c . Some a t $ha@@ a r g u m a ~ t d a r e r a t h @ r

censtralnsd

I n

t h e i r p a a i t i o n a

in

t h e

rantencar

b u t o t h e r s may

"esterday t h e s h i p

satled

f r o m t h e l i g h t h o u s e t o t h e d o c k , "

"The

# h i p

s a i l r d

f r o m

t h s

lighthau8a t o t h e dock yesterday." wYast@rday t h e s h i p r a i l e d t o t h e dock from t h e l l g h t h o u r ~ . ~

g t i s a f c a u a r a

unrsrranabl@

t a t r y t o

maintain

a l l t h e ~ a s 8 i b X e

p r f t r r n r ! Lnefcad r s

leave

Lnrsrtlon o f f h r t e r d v c r b i a f

rrguncntr

t o r ring11 heuristic

routine

( d c r e r i b c d below), There are

rrvcral

jurtitlcations f o r t h j l , amanp them8 t i ) t h e p a r t i c u l a r

farm 09 t h e

verb

cannot

b e grneobatsd u n t i l t h e s u b j e c t b b j e c t ( a 5 )

@ r ~ r t @ L

p o s s i b l e

P L & C I ~ ~

and ( 3 1 t h e t a

r t a

some

heuristic

one

may

question

whether passive t e n p l a t a o a h o u l d b e a t o r e 4 1

c@tt@inlyr they c o u l d b e d e r i v e d r On t h e o t h e r hand, n e g l e c t i n g

t~

rtare

thorn woWd

farce

ur t o I n d % b a t @ wAth

each

Verb ( 8 4 n 0 3 ) ~

whether Lt can

(or,

ronrtimar, m u s t ) be p a r r i v i z c d , I n d i c a t i n g

" t r . n ~ l t l v @ V i r naf enough

since

there are tranritlvc vrrbr ( i . a , , vcrbr t h a t taka

an

object) t h a t

cannot

b c p s s s l v i z a d .

8incs we hava t o r t o r a t h e information a n y w a y p we Can r a v e dame

(10)

There

arr

rtvsrrl

rraronr

f o r g c n r r a f i n q t h e v e r b a f t e r t h e

mafor

@rgumentr. F t r ~ t t h e l u b j r e t a u a t b e p a n e r r f a d ro t h a t t h e

v e r b

can

b r

mrdc

t o a p r r r

i n

nuabnr. S e c o n d , c e r t a i n rare t r n r r r

8tr

t r u e o f

v r r b - p r r t i c l r conblnitionc rkiir n o t cL t h e i c o l a t r d v e r b ,

Btncr,

in addition, prrticl@c

must a p p e a r r f t t r o b j e c t 8

t h a t F S h o r t (like

p r a n o w n r l

b u t b s f ~ r s a b j a e t e t h a t a r e l o n g

(like

noun

phraras), t h e p a r t i c l e nurt b e p o s i t i o n a d a f t e r t h e

o b j e c t j S

grncrrtcd.

F f n a L 1 ~ 1

i n o c r t i a n

a f soma a d v a r b i r b r

t r . ~ ,

annot"

rrqulrrr

an r u x l l i r r y v e r b I- t h u g v e r b g r n a r a t l o n

aurt

fotlor r d v r r b i r l grncratlon,

VERB PATTERNS

T h i s #tudy s t a r t e d with t h e 25 V e r b p a t t c r n r " p r c r c n t c d b y

Hornby ( 1 9 5 4 ) . T h e ~ e

Ln

t u r n

crwr f r o m a d l c t g o n a r y b y Hornby c t

el.,

( 1 9 4 8 ) . V c t M in t h e dict$onary &re c Z & i r l t i r d & c ~ o r d i n g t a t h e i r g r o s s

syntactic

p r t t r r n ~ a f l u b j r c t p a b j r c t ( s 1 , end

c o m ~ ~ r a e n t C s ) ~

most

o t t h e ~ a f t q r n r r r a r u b - d l v g d a d e Thc rutkorr

cl@La

t h a t

there

p a t f r r n r WXXNnt f o r a l l

conttruetlanr

i n v o l v i n g

& I & t h e

verbs

I n t h e L r 4 i e t i a n a r y d n d r b y N t t n e f o n ,

I n

t h e

IangUagr, I tl&SrifiertLon i s n o t Z m m c d i & t e l Y u s e f u l t o

C ~ t h p U t d h t i ~ n a l l i n g u l r t r r l n c a i t d o a s not a d d r a g s u n d e r l y i n g

~ e m a a t i c s ~

H a v a t k h e l e ~ ~ ~ i t $ r c l a r r t h a t i t can ssrve ae t h s

b r r l r

f o r

r

&artvatIan

o l

U n d @ r l Y l n g c a r r r t r u c t u h a r

prrtlculatly, &r a bar16 f o r Vplnrrrtion t c n g l & t r o , *

There pattern8

&re

b @ l n g c a n v a r t a d i n t a t a m p l e t @ @ much llkt

tho#* d e r i v e d

a r r l f e t r

t h a t n r l y r i s i s B a i n g p e r f a r m e d w i t h

(11)

a p p e a r ) , There t e m p l a t e a s e r v e ro t h o major portion o f a m o d u l a r *gan@ratLon g r a m m a r r * w i t h t h e

r@aarlnder

in

t h r farm o f h s u t i a ; t i c

tunctianr

t o r c o n s t r u c t i n g syntactic constituentr,

N O U N PHRASES

What t o I n c l u B b

Ln

a

noun

phrase should b e another

mrttar

f a r

t h e d i r c a u r t e module t o j u d g e , There are

no

w ~ 1 l ~ E a r m ~ l a C a d

f u l r l

eccountlng

f a r

anaphorl

In

EngliShj i n d e a d , there a r c

t r w

w s f l e e 8 t r b l i e h a d parameters a t h e r than t h a t %ha hearer m u s t b a

a b l e t o r ~ a a l v a t h o (pto)nouns t o t h e i r r e f o r a n t s , T h e &D@ak@a?p

S h o u l d t m p l o y anaphoxa

In

order t o a v o l a t @ p e t i t l o n r b u t o n l y P t h i s B0deX of! t h e hearer i n d i c r t o ~ t h a t t h e ~ ~ Q P C P can t d s o l v d t h e

a m b i g u i t y , Thcrc

arc

same lawcpowrr ptaneminalization r u l e r t h a t could be d i r e c t l y i n c a r p 0 r a t s d in a generator r a f g @ x $ v % z a l P a n r

f o r

s ~ 1 1 p 1 0 . N c V ~ P ~ ~ B ~ ~ S S ~ f t

IS

i m p a s t a n t L O

P ~ B Z I Z B

that When

r

generator

i r

unaware

o f t h e

e a n v c r t a f l ~ n a l

context, it l h a u l d

not indepsndantLy d e c i d e haw t o ganaratr

noun

p h p a 1 4 8 1 I t CQR

only d e c i d e when t o d6

r o e

T h i s r b t u a t l o n har not been u n i v + r o a l L y r @ c a q n f i e d r b u t I t 1 s becoming hnercarlngZY c l e a r

t h r t a Q Z ~ c s u r t e m s d u h

m u s t

b e c a n r u b t s d d u r i n g t h e ~ s n a r r t l a n p h r r s . The d i r e o u r r e modal. w i l l not know ahead of timr what NPI

are

% O b e p r ~ d u e @ d u n ~ @ s g $t p4rforrn\@ many o f ths g e m @ ~ P o r a t i a n a t h a t t h e paneratar w o u l d d o anyr4y. Y a t t h e cantcxt-8cnritivo d e c i r i o n s t r r t ~ g ~ may h . v e t o r e s o r b ts r u s h m a a r u t b r a r d l a e w b $ q u a t i n g t h e p r o p o r r b o u t p u t u o L w g khs model of &he hrsrer

in

order t a d ~ t e r m b n r what rnaphdra if4

t e s e a v a b l a ,

t %

I r

(12)

f o r rany

rrrsonr

i t nurt b e p a r t o f t h e d l r c o u r r r m o d u l c ,

T h e r e f a t e t h r g e n r r r t o r S h o u l d p a 6 S a n y R n c u n U c o n s t i t u c n t

t o t h @ dJscourre m o d u l e ( p l r h s p t r i t h i t s r r c o m m c n d a t i o n a b o u t

how t o P I g d U c e the c o n s t i t u e n t , ; t h n o d u l e ~ m u s t d c t c r m i n r i f a

p r o n o u n

or

b & g a

n o u n

i t ambiguour t o t h e h e a r e r , a n d , i f s o , w h a t

t o add t o t h e n o u n ln order t o makt t h e d e s i r e d r e f e r e n t e l e a r ,

Ln

the

current

SRI s y s t e m ,

n o u n

p r t t c r n r [ S l o c u m , t a r p P c a r ) a r a

U S I ~ t o

control

noun

phrase

grnrrrtian,

Much l i k e v e r b p a t t e r n s ,

noun

p r t t c r n r order t h e ~ o n ~ t l f u @ n t 8 i n t h e p h r a r r a n d i n d i c a t e

how

each

eon8tLturnf Is t o b e generated b y naming a f u n c t i c n t o

b e Called w i t h t h e

nQtwerK

~ a n s t f t u e n t f

((DET]

[Ad3 QUA&) ( A d j SIZE) ( A d j SHRFE) ( A d 1 C O L O R ) (N)]

Batttrhr like t h i r

e r a

d i r t r i b u t r d a b o u t t h e network h i @ r @ r e h y j

in

t h e f u t u r e @ t h @ Q L ~ c ~ u r r c aadulc r i l l dccLde t o r e a c h p q t t r r n

constituent

whather f t i 8 t o appear i n t h e p h r r c s ,

MEURZSTXC RULES

R ~ r n b y d+rcrlb@r t h r e e b s r l c p o r l t l a n r f a r a d v c r b r in t h e

clrussr

"rentff

pa#b$tionp R ~ t d n pssltlonr and @ a n d u ~ e r i t l o n ~

Front

poritgen r d v r r b r

occur

b a t a r e

t h e s u b j r c t t w V e r t a ~ d a y h @

want

hornat from these ha t o o k a t a x i , * The i n t o r r o q l t i w a r d v a r b r

(a,g,

now,

when?

r r r

t y p i c a l l y c o n s t r d k n ~ d t o

front

P o o i t i o n l

o t h e r 8 miy r p p r r t t h r r r t a t p u r p o r r r o f r m p h a r l a

cr

e a n t r a l t .

M i d p e r l e i o n

r d v a r b a

occur

v i r h t h e v e r b ( a t r i n g l t Sf t h e r e

ar*

medal

s r

ru#ilLrrv

v a r h r s

t h e dbvrrls

occurs

a f t o r t h e f i r s t

one,

Oth@twi8r the r d ~ ~ r b

w ~ L L

appear b t k ~ r @ t h e V e r b l cxcapt

(13)

t h a r a r l @ o h @ if8 t y p i ~ l l l y buw8] *he I t 1 t 1 1 I waiting,@

End p o s i t i o n a d v e r b s

occur

r t t r r

t h e v e r b and

a f t e r

any

d b t e e t or indirect object pteacnt, While t a l a t i v ~ l y f e n

clrurss

have mare t h r h

one

a d V Q r b

i n

tront parttian

or

mara

t h r n

sns

In

@ i d

porltianr

i t i r

common

t a t r r v c r r l .dV@rbS t o appear

in

and

~ a r l t l o n

in

t h a

rams

c l a u s a l * t h a V p l a y t h e

P i a n a

PeerlY

t a g c t h r r w ,

h d v a r b l r l r

o f

t i m e

(rnrrrring

t h e 4uartiont w r h @ n ? w ) usually

d e e u t

in a n d

p o a l t i o n ,

b u t may appear

In grsnt

p o s i t i o n

f a r

aaphrrtr

or

contrast.

k d v e r b i a l r o f frequency (anrwsrlng t k a

quettbon, wRaw ~ f t a n ? ~ l

can

b e s p l i t

i n Q

t w o g r o u p s , The f i r s t

group is comgo@@d ~f ringla-nerd a d v e r b s t h a t t y a l c a l l y s e e u i fn

& i d porition b u t a I r o may b r

in

i n d p a t L t i a n j t h @ s a c a n d i r eosparsd a $ m u l t i p l s = w o r d phrrrrr t h a t dgp&ar Pn end p a r i t i o n

e r ~

&err L r r 9 U r n t l Y r

in

t r e n t

Position. A d v e r b s of duration [ V l f ~ r l

hew

lonqtw)

u d u ~ l l y

have end

parltlan,

wbth %song p6sBtPon

f b r

empha8fs

or

csntxartr Adverb8 o f p l a c e and d i r a e t l e n narrnall~

hivQ and

porition.

A d v c r b r o f 4 r g r c a and manner h a v e m i d o r and

~ O S I ~ L Q R I

d e p b n d i n g

on

t h r a d v a r b ,

Along W i t h r u a h r u l e r c o n ~ ~ r n l n g t h e B a r L t i o n r O L Vsriout t y p e s o f a d v r r b r ,

t h e r e

murt b r a mcchanirm t o 0rd.f t h e r d v c r b r t h a t arr L a

s ~ c u r

In

t h a "maQn p e t i t L o n , T h r r r

r r a

e o m e

h @ u a l r t i c l ~ among rdverbi.11 o f

t i m e

Car

p l a ~ 1 1 t h e s m a l l a t

unit

81 u r u r l l y pL4ccb

t l r l t ,

u n l r r l i t

t r

44604 4 8 &R s f t a r t h a u p h t l

(14)

usually precede t h o r e

of

f r e q u e n c y , w h i c h i n

t u r n

p r a e o d e t h o o ~ a t time,

T h e r e r u l e 8 r e i a p l r m o n t s d in th@ raRr

r a u t L n ~

M a t produce@ t h e v e r b 1 when @ t e m p l a t e i s f i r a t f n e a r p r c k e d =- N W h

eo B 8 e q u e n c c o f

function

e r l l r t h e R V a ~ t w o r "Vpao k a y a a r c

lonored.

once

t h e l U b j C C t , ~ b j C C t ( S 1 a n d c o m p l t m c n t ( a ) l n d i c r t r d

by t h e

t c n p l r t r

rrr

O a n r r r f r d r t h i s

* c l e a n

u p m

r o u t i n e

$ 6 c a l l e d . Et employg the h a u x i t t i e k d ~ r c r f b e d a b a v a L a a d d t h e a d v e r b i a l C ~ r t & t f t U @ n t & and V h F b r t h e n concatsnatss t h e c a n s t b t u t n t s t a

produce

r

complete

@IruseI

DXSCUSSTON

f n

theory, t h e s e t o f p o r s i b l c E n p L l r h r a n t c n c r s i a

i n f fnZtsr Tha o b v l a o r q u s a t l b n m a n

~ t @ @ @ r

O l f

sne

t r i e s t o

account

ror t h e m with t a r n p l i t r r r

won

t t h e r e b c an i n f i n i t e

n u m b e r eL

t a a p l a t t ~ ? ~ The s i m p l e antxcr i r r "Nor t o r romc of t h e

Sam@

r e l l ~ n l

t h a t

allow

a f i n i t e grammar t o g c n r r a t a an i n t l n i t e

n u m b e r

of

itr2ngr.R One can p r e d u c a r a n t r n c e r o f a r b i t r a r y L e n g t h

by ( 1 ) ~ T ' b l t t ' a t ~ a n b @ d d l n g r and ( 2 1 a r b i t r a r y c o n j u n c t t a n @ Caw@

B o t o not do s o b y includdng a r b i t r a r y n u m b e r s sf d i s t i n c t c a r @

erpuacntl. Evrn r a t h e numbcr o t b a s i c p a t t e r n s c o u l d b e t n l ~ a m e l Y I a f gc

,

E v i d r n c a , horevrrr i l t c t h e c o n t r a r y ! t h e

l V e n t U I I nUnbqr o f [email protected]@# w o u l d appear t o b r r e v e r a l t i m e 8 t h e

number O I p l t t e r n r ~ a w i n g t o t h r S U b l t i t U t i o n o f p a r t t c u l a r

p r a ~ a r i t l o n e

Ear

n p r ~ p w

In

t h e r ~ ~ t i c t l c attaro or, a n d t h a

arrlgnaent

o t dltfetent c r l e nancr t o a p a r t i c u l a r canstitusnt

(15)

Dcotsch,

Barbara

G, Establishing

Context

in

Task-Oriented

b l a l d g ~ .

Prrrcnted

a t

t h e

Thirteenth

Annual

Meeting o t t h e

Atsooiatian

f a t

Computational

Llngutrflcr,

Barton,

M a ~ r a c h u ~ d t t ~ ,

S O

October

* 1

Navarnber

1 9 7 5 ,

OoLdmrnr Neil

H e

Computcr

G ~ n e r a t i o n o f

Natural L@nguaga

tram

a

D I I ~

Conceptual

I r r e .

A 1

M e m o

2 4 7 , A r t i t i ~ i a l

I n t e l l i g e n ~ ~

Laboratory, 8trnford Univcr8ityt S t r r n f

ord,

C q i f o r n i b 1974,

Gordon

D I v i d t

and

Lakaff, George.

Convearettonal

Portulater.

Syntax s n d

Senanticst

V o l u m e

3 1 S p e e c h A c t s , E d i t e d by Peter Cole and J e r r y

L. Morganr

A c a d r m i a

P r s a ~ ,

N e w Y g r k r

1975 rn

H@ndtixt

Gary G. Expanding thr U t i l i t y o f

Bemantie

Nafworkr f hrough

Pact

i t

toning,

Advance

Pav@r

r

o f t h e

F o u r t h

Internationcl

J o h t

Contcrrncs

on A r t i f i c i a l

Z n t b l l l g e n e e , T b i i i o l r C s o r ~ i a ,

U6SRl 3.8 G e p t a m b c r 1 9 7 5 , I I S a I Z l r

Hornby, 8 t r Gatrcby, V e t a n d W~lK@flb@Xdr H Q The Advmced

Laatnet@@

Dictionary

o f

C u r r a n t

Engllrh. O x f o r d

P r @ r r ~

London@ 1 9 4 8 ,

Rita.#

H, Barry,

Autoastic S p e e c h

U n d e r r f a n d i n ~

SYrtamr.

Proessdlngr,

Eleventh

Annual

IEEE

Camputst S a e l e t y

Contcranea,

Harhlngton,

D.

C e r 9 - i 1 S ~ p t r m b e r 1 9 7 5 ,

Siamanrr R o b t r t & I and S ~ O C U ~ ~

Jonathan.

Gaa@rartinq

English

Dlrcourcr

f r o m

Senrntlc

N I E W O ~ K C . CommUnicstlonr ~t the

ACH, 1 9 9 2 , 1 s t 8 9 1 1 9 0 9 n

S J o c u l ,

Jonathan.

Q u a r t i o n

Anarrring v i a Csnanlcrl V e r b 8

a n d Bsrnrnt

l c

Madcllat t C ~ n s r a t i n g %ngllrh

t r o w

t h e W O ~ Q ~ ,

Technical

Report H t = i 3 t

Department

a & Csapartrr bcbtawcar r

Univeoritp

a t T a ~ a r ~ Austin@ Ttx.8,

January

1 9 1 3 .

$locum,

Jonathan,

Verb Patterns and

Noun

P a t t a r n s

I n

E n g l i ~ h t A C l & r

Anrlyrir.

A r t l f i ~ L a l

Lntrlliprncs Center,

SRX4

References

Related documents

Adult ESL programs also have established content standards for English language acquisition, but there are no explicit standards for teaching civics education in adult ESL

On the modelling of M2 tidal magnetic signatures effects of physical approximations and numerical resolution Vel?msk??et?al Earth, Planets and Space (2018) 70 192 https //doi

Kristin Emerson is a graduate of Otterbein College in Westerville, Ohio, where she 

In this study, we determined the structural changes, specifically on crystalline cellulose, of natural, dilute sulfuric acid pretreated and delignified cell wall surfaces of

Here we present a new method to construct the explicit formula of a sequence of numbers and polynomials generated by a linear recurrence relation of order 2.. The applications of

A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories. International Research Journal of Human

The simu- lation scenario includes a time-varying outdoor temperature and detailed AC models that include a time-varying cooling capacity, COP, and power draw (when the AC is

GBD: Global burden of disease study; LMICs: Lower and middle income countries; MoC: Models of care; NCD: Non-communicable disease; SAGE: Study on global AGEing and adult health;