• No results found

Some Common Fixed Point Theorems in S-Metric Space

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Some Common Fixed Point Theorems in S-Metric Space"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710

I

nternational

J

ournal of

I

nnovative

R

esearch in

S

cience,

E

ngineering and

T

echnology

(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015

Some Common Fixed Point Theorems in

S-Metric Space

Tanmoy Mitra

Asst. Teacher, Akabpur High School, Akabpur, Nadanghat, Burdwan, West Bengal, India

ABSTRACT: In 2012 S. Sedghi, N. Shobe and A. Aliouche have introduced the concept of S-metric space. In this

paper some common fixed point results for two mappings has been established in S-metric space.

KEYWORDS: S-metric space, Fixed point.

AMS Subject Classification (2010): 47H10, 54H25.

I. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES

Definition 1 [1]: Let be a nonempty set. An S-metric on is a function : →[0,) that satisfies the following

conditions for all , , , ∈

(S1) ( , , ) = 0 if and only if = = .

(S2) ( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , ).

The pair ( , ) is called an S-metric space.

The concept of S-metric space is a generalization of a G-metric space [11] and a D*- metric space [14].

Definition 2 [2]: Let be a nonempty set. A b-metric on is a function : →[0,) such that, for a real number

≥1, the following conditions hold for all , , ∈ .

(i) ( , ) = 0 if and only if = .

(ii) ( , ) = ( , ).

(iii) ( , )≤ [ ( , ) + ( , )].

The pair ( , ) is called a b-metric space.

Definition 3 [1]: Let ( , ) be an S-metric space. For > 0 and ∈ , we define the open ball ( , ) and the

closed ball [ , ] with centre and radius as follows ( , ) = { ∈ : ( , , ) < },

[ , ] = { ∈ : ( , , )≤ }.

Definition 4 [1]: Let ( , ) be an S-metric space.

(1) A sequence { } in is said to converge , if ( , , )→0 as →. That is for any > 0, there exists ∈ ℕ such that for all ≥ , we have ( , , ) < .

(2) A sequence { } in is a Cauchy sequence if ( , , )→0 as , →. That is for every > 0, there exists ∈ ℕ such that for all , ≥ , ( , , ) < .

(3) The S-metric space ( , ) is complete if every Cauchy sequence is a convergent sequence.

Lemma 5 [1]: In an S-metric space, we have ( , , ) = ( , , ), ∀ , ∈ .

Lemma 6 [1]: Let ( , ) be an S-metric space. If → and → then

(2)

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710

I

nternational

J

ournal of

I

nnovative

R

esearch in

S

cience,

E

ngineering and

T

echnology

(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015

II. MAIN RESULTS

Theorem 1: Let , be two self-maps on a complete S-metric space ( , ) and

( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , ), ∀ , ∈ and , , are non-negative reals with, + + < 1, + 3 < 1, and + 3 < 1.

Then the mappings , have a unique common fixed point in .

Proof: Let ∈ .

Let us define a sequence { } in as

= , = , = 0,1,2, … … … ..

Now ( , , ) = ( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +

( , , )

= ( , , ) + ( , , ) +

( , , )

( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) +

( , , )] [ By S2]

= ( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) + ( , , )] [By Lemma 5] Thus,

( , , )≤ ( , , ). Let =ℎ . Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, 0≤ ℎ < 1.

Thus

( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , ) .

Again,

( , , ) = ( , , )

= ( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +

( , , )

= ( , , ) + ( , , ) +

( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) +

( , , )]

= ( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) +

( , , )

Thus,

( , , )≤ ( , , )

Let =ℎ . Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, 0≤ ℎ < 1.

(3)

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710

I

nternational

J

ournal of

I

nnovative

R

esearch in

S

cience,

E

ngineering and

T

echnology

(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015

Take ℎ= max {ℎ ,ℎ }. Now

( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )

And also

( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )

Thus

( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )≤ ⋯… …≤ ℎ ( , , )

Now for > ,

( , , )≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , )

≤2 ( , , ) + 2 ( , , ) + ( , , )

≤ ………. ≤2 ( , , ) + 2 ( , , ) +⋯… … … … . . +

2 ( , , ) + ( , , )

≤2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +⋯… … … + ( , , )

≤2[ℎ +ℎ +⋯… … … . +ℎ ] ( , , )

≤ ( , , )

⟶0 as ⟶.

Thus { } is a Cauchy sequence.

Now since ( , ) is complete, there exists ∈ , such that → as →.

Now,

( , , )≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , )

≤2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , )] + ( , , )

= 2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , )] +

( , , )

Letting →, we get, ( , , )≤2 ( , , )

Thus, (1− ) ( , , )≤0.

Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, ( , , ) = 0.

Thus = .

Also, ( , , ) = ( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , )

= ( , , )

Thus, (1− ) ( , , )≤0.

Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, ( , , ) = 0.

Thus = .

Therefore, = = .

i.e. is a common fixed point of and .

(4)

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710

I

nternational

J

ournal of

I

nnovative

R

esearch in

S

cience,

E

ngineering and

T

echnology

(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015

Now, ( , , ∗) = ( , ,)

≤ ( , , ∗) + ( , ,) + (,, )

= ( , , ∗) + ( , ,) + (,, )

= ( , , ∗) + ( , ,) + ( , ,)

Thus, (1− − − ) ( , , ∗)0.

Since 0≤ + + < 1, ( , , ∗) = 0.

Thus = ∗.

Thus is the unique common fixed point of and .

Corollary 1.1: Let be a self-maps on a complete S-metric space ( , ) and

( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , ), ∀ , ∈ ,

, , are non-negative reals with + + < 1, + 3 < 1, + 3 < 1.

Then the mapping has a unique fixed point in .

Proof: Setting = = in the above theorem, we get the result.

Theorem 2: Let ( , ) be a complete S-metric space. Let , be two self-maps on , satisfying

( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) (( , , ), , ) , where 0≤ + < 1.

Then , have a unique common fixed point in .

Proof: Let ∈ .

Let us define a sequence { } in as

= , = , = 0,1,2, … … … ..

Now ( , , ) = ( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )

( , , )

= ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )

( , , )

= ( , , )

Again,

( , , ) = ( , , )

= ( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )

( , , )

= ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )

( , , )

= ( , , )

Now,

( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ⋯… … .≤ ( , , ).

Now,

( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ⋯… … .≤ ( , , ).

Now, for > ,

(5)

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710

I

nternational

J

ournal of

I

nnovative

R

esearch in

S

cience,

E

ngineering and

T

echnology

(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015

≤2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +⋯… … . + ( , , )]

≤2[ + +⋯… … … + ] ( , , )

≤ ( , , )

→0, as → ∞ [Since 0≤ + < 1. ]

Thus { } is a Cauchy sequence.

Since ( , ) is complete, there exists ∈ , such that → as → ∞.

Now,

( , , )≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , )

= 2 ( , , ) + ( , , )

≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , ( , ,) ( ), , ) + ( , , )

= 2 ( , , ) + ( , , ( , ,) ( ), , ) + ( , , )

Letting → ∞ and using the lemma 5 and lemma 6, we get,

( , , )≤0

Hence = .

Again,

( , , ) = ( , , )

≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )

( , , )

= 0

Thus, ( , , ) = 0 and hence = .

Therefore, = = .

i.e. is a common fixed point of and .

For Uniqueness, let ∗ , such that ==.

(6)

ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710

I

nternational

J

ournal of

I

nnovative

R

esearch in

S

cience,

E

ngineering and

T

echnology

(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015

( , , ∗) = ( , ,)

≤ ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗) ( ∗, ∗, ) ( , , ∗)

= ( , , ∗) + ( , ,∗) (∗, ∗, ) ( , , ∗)

≤ ( , , ∗) + ( , ,)

Thus, (1− − ) ( , , ∗)0.

Since 0≤ + < 1, ( , , ∗) = 0.

Thus = ∗.

Hence is the unique common fixed point of and .

III. CONCLUSON

Many other common fixed point results for two mappings, satisfying different types of rational inequalities in S-metric space can also be proved similarly.

REFFERENCES

[1] S. Sedghi, N. Shobe, A. Aliouche, A generalization of fixed point theorem in S-metric spaces, Mat. Vesnik 64 (2012), 258 – 266. [2] I. A. Bakhtin, The contraction principle in quasimetric spaces, Func. An., Ulianowsk, Gos. Ped. Ins. 30 (1989), 26 – 37. [3] S. Sedghi, N. V. Dzung, Fixed Point Theorems on S-metric Spaces, Mat. Vesnik (01.11.2012).

[4] R. Kannan, Some results on fixed points II, Amer. Math. Monthly 76 (1969), 405 – 408.

[5] S. Sedghi, N. Shobe, H. Zhou, A Common fixed point theorem in ∗ metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2007 (2007), 1 – 13.

References

Related documents

Róziewicz-Ładoń K., Post ę powanie przed Prezesem Urz ę du Ochrony Konkurencji i Kon- sumentów w zakresie przeciwdzia ł ania praktykom ograniczaj ą cym konkurencj ę [ Proceeding

Switching from methadone to another opioid is not simply the reverse process; the equianalgesic dose ratio tables previously mentioned are not bi-directional and cannot be used

The impact of the universal screening and decolonisation on the MRSA burden was immediate: there was a sharp decline in on-admission colonisation prevalence from a peak at 3.59% in

proximus beetles, the relative ratio of geranyl butanoate and geranyl octanoate was higher than that in gland extracts.. In addition, comparison of a segment of the

The anticancer potentiality of the purified pentasaccharide against both Human colon cancer (CaCo‑2) and Human breast cancer (MCF7) cell lines with its safety usage pattern

Galls showed significantly higher content of total soluble sugar, reducing sugar, starch a-amylase activity and invertase enzymes activity and lower content of reducing sugar.. KEY

may ilave abnormal values under different circumstances. Second, patients with com- pletely-manifested cystic fibrosis, who, ac- cording to the genetic hypothesis, may be thought of