ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710
I
nternational
J
ournal of
I
nnovative
R
esearch in
S
cience,
E
ngineering and
T
echnology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015
Some Common Fixed Point Theorems in
S-Metric Space
Tanmoy Mitra
Asst. Teacher, Akabpur High School, Akabpur, Nadanghat, Burdwan, West Bengal, India
ABSTRACT: In 2012 S. Sedghi, N. Shobe and A. Aliouche have introduced the concept of S-metric space. In this
paper some common fixed point results for two mappings has been established in S-metric space.
KEYWORDS: S-metric space, Fixed point.
AMS Subject Classification (2010): 47H10, 54H25.
I. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES
Definition 1 [1]: Let be a nonempty set. An S-metric on is a function : →[0,∞) that satisfies the following
conditions for all , , , ∈
(S1) ( , , ) = 0 if and only if = = .
(S2) ( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , ).
The pair ( , ) is called an S-metric space.
The concept of S-metric space is a generalization of a G-metric space [11] and a D*- metric space [14].
Definition 2 [2]: Let be a nonempty set. A b-metric on is a function : →[0,∞) such that, for a real number
≥1, the following conditions hold for all , , ∈ .
(i) ( , ) = 0 if and only if = .
(ii) ( , ) = ( , ).
(iii) ( , )≤ [ ( , ) + ( , )].
The pair ( , ) is called a b-metric space.
Definition 3 [1]: Let ( , ) be an S-metric space. For > 0 and ∈ , we define the open ball ( , ) and the
closed ball [ , ] with centre and radius as follows ( , ) = { ∈ : ( , , ) < },
[ , ] = { ∈ : ( , , )≤ }.
Definition 4 [1]: Let ( , ) be an S-metric space.
(1) A sequence { } in is said to converge , if ( , , )→0 as →∞. That is for any > 0, there exists ∈ ℕ such that for all ≥ , we have ( , , ) < .
(2) A sequence { } in is a Cauchy sequence if ( , , )→0 as , →∞. That is for every > 0, there exists ∈ ℕ such that for all , ≥ , ( , , ) < .
(3) The S-metric space ( , ) is complete if every Cauchy sequence is a convergent sequence.
Lemma 5 [1]: In an S-metric space, we have ( , , ) = ( , , ), ∀ , ∈ .
Lemma 6 [1]: Let ( , ) be an S-metric space. If → and → then
ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710
I
nternational
J
ournal of
I
nnovative
R
esearch in
S
cience,
E
ngineering and
T
echnology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015
II. MAIN RESULTS
Theorem 1: Let , be two self-maps on a complete S-metric space ( , ) and
( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , ), ∀ , ∈ and , , are non-negative reals with, + + < 1, + 3 < 1, and + 3 < 1.
Then the mappings , have a unique common fixed point in .
Proof: Let ∈ .
Let us define a sequence { } in as
= , = , = 0,1,2, … … … ..
Now ( , , ) = ( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +
( , , )
= ( , , ) + ( , , ) +
( , , )
≤
( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) +
( , , )] [ By S2]
= ( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) + ( , , )] [By Lemma 5] Thus,
( , , )≤ ( , , ). Let =ℎ . Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, 0≤ ℎ < 1.
Thus
( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , ) .
Again,
( , , ) = ( , , )
= ( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +
( , , )
= ( , , ) + ( , , ) +
( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) +
( , , )]
= ( , , ) + [2 ( , , ) +
( , , )
Thus,
( , , )≤ ( , , )
Let =ℎ . Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, 0≤ ℎ < 1.
ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710
I
nternational
J
ournal of
I
nnovative
R
esearch in
S
cience,
E
ngineering and
T
echnology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015
Take ℎ= max {ℎ ,ℎ }. Now
( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )
And also
( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )
Thus
( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )≤ ℎ ( , , )≤ ⋯… …≤ ℎ ( , , )
Now for > ,
( , , )≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , )
≤2 ( , , ) + 2 ( , , ) + ( , , )
≤ ………. ≤2 ( , , ) + 2 ( , , ) +⋯… … … … . . +
2 ( , , ) + ( , , )
≤2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +⋯… … … + ( , , )
≤2[ℎ +ℎ +⋯… … … . +ℎ ] ( , , )
≤ ( , , )
⟶0 as ⟶∞.
Thus { } is a Cauchy sequence.
Now since ( , ) is complete, there exists ∈ , such that → as →∞.
Now,
( , , )≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , )
≤2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , )] + ( , , )
= 2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , )] +
( , , )
Letting →∞, we get, ( , , )≤2 ( , , )
Thus, (1− ) ( , , )≤0.
Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, ( , , ) = 0.
Thus = .
Also, ( , , ) = ( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , )
= ( , , )
Thus, (1− ) ( , , )≤0.
Since 0≤ + 3 < 1, ( , , ) = 0.
Thus = .
Therefore, = = .
i.e. is a common fixed point of and .
ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710
I
nternational
J
ournal of
I
nnovative
R
esearch in
S
cience,
E
ngineering and
T
echnology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015
Now, ( , , ∗) = ( , , ∗)
≤ ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗) + ( ∗, ∗, )
= ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗) + ( ∗, ∗, )
= ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗)
Thus, (1− − − ) ( , , ∗)≤0.
Since 0≤ + + < 1, ( , , ∗) = 0.
Thus = ∗.
Thus is the unique common fixed point of and .
Corollary 1.1: Let be a self-maps on a complete S-metric space ( , ) and
( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) + ( , , ), ∀ , ∈ ,
, , are non-negative reals with + + < 1, + 3 < 1, + 3 < 1.
Then the mapping has a unique fixed point in .
Proof: Setting = = in the above theorem, we get the result.
Theorem 2: Let ( , ) be a complete S-metric space. Let , be two self-maps on , satisfying
( , , )≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) (( , , ), , ) , where 0≤ + < 1.
Then , have a unique common fixed point in .
Proof: Let ∈ .
Let us define a sequence { } in as
= , = , = 0,1,2, … … … ..
Now ( , , ) = ( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
= ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
= ( , , )
Again,
( , , ) = ( , , )
= ( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
= ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
= ( , , )
Now,
( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ⋯… … .≤ ( , , ).
Now,
( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ( , , )≤ ⋯… … .≤ ( , , ).
Now, for > ,
ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710
I
nternational
J
ournal of
I
nnovative
R
esearch in
S
cience,
E
ngineering and
T
echnology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015
≤2[ ( , , ) + ( , , ) +⋯… … . + ( , , )]
≤2[ + +⋯… … … + ] ( , , )
≤ ( , , )
→0, as → ∞ [Since 0≤ + < 1. ]
Thus { } is a Cauchy sequence.
Since ( , ) is complete, there exists ∈ , such that → as → ∞.
Now,
( , , )≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , )
= 2 ( , , ) + ( , , )
≤2 ( , , ) + ( , , ( , ,) ( ), , ) + ( , , )
= 2 ( , , ) + ( , , ( , ,) ( ), , ) + ( , , )
Letting → ∞ and using the lemma 5 and lemma 6, we get,
( , , )≤0
Hence = .
Again,
( , , ) = ( , , )
≤ ( , , ) + ( , , ) ( , , )
( , , )
= 0
Thus, ( , , ) = 0 and hence = .
Therefore, = = .
i.e. is a common fixed point of and .
For Uniqueness, let ∗∈ , such that ∗= ∗= ∗.
ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710
I
nternational
J
ournal of
I
nnovative
R
esearch in
S
cience,
E
ngineering and
T
echnology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015
( , , ∗) = ( , , ∗)
≤ ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗) ( ∗, ∗, ) ( , , ∗)
= ( , , ∗) + ( , ,∗) (∗, ∗, ) ( , , ∗)
≤ ( , , ∗) + ( , , ∗)
Thus, (1− − ) ( , , ∗)≤0.
Since 0≤ + < 1, ( , , ∗) = 0.
Thus = ∗.
Hence is the unique common fixed point of and .
III. CONCLUSON
Many other common fixed point results for two mappings, satisfying different types of rational inequalities in S-metric space can also be proved similarly.
REFFERENCES
[1] S. Sedghi, N. Shobe, A. Aliouche, A generalization of fixed point theorem in S-metric spaces, Mat. Vesnik 64 (2012), 258 – 266. [2] I. A. Bakhtin, The contraction principle in quasimetric spaces, Func. An., Ulianowsk, Gos. Ped. Ins. 30 (1989), 26 – 37. [3] S. Sedghi, N. V. Dzung, Fixed Point Theorems on S-metric Spaces, Mat. Vesnik (01.11.2012).
[4] R. Kannan, Some results on fixed points II, Amer. Math. Monthly 76 (1969), 405 – 408.
[5] S. Sedghi, N. Shobe, H. Zhou, A Common fixed point theorem in ∗ metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2007 (2007), 1 – 13.