• No results found

DOA Estimation of Noncircular Signals with Combined ESPRIT for Coprime Linear Array

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "DOA Estimation of Noncircular Signals with Combined ESPRIT for Coprime Linear Array"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2017 International Conference on Computer, Electronics and Communication Engineering (CECE 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-476-9

DOA Estimation of Noncircular Signals with Combined

ESPRIT for Coprime Linear Array

Hui ZHAI

1

, Xiao-fei ZHANG

1,2,3

and Wang ZHENG

1

1College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, People’s Republic of China

2State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 211096

3National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 210096.

Keywords: Direction of arrival, Coprime array, Noncircular signal, ESPRIT.

Abstract. Direction of arrival (DOA) estimation of noncircular signals for coprime linear array is investigated, and a combined estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance technique (ESPRIT) based algorithm is proposed. The coprime linear array can be de-composed into two uniform linear arrays, so ESPRIT is firstly used to obtain ambiguous DOA estimations, then unique DOA estimation is achieved by finding the coincide results from the two decomposed subarrays based on the coprimeness. The proposed algorithm increase the degree of freedom, enhance the performance of angle estimation, and identifies more targets than conventional methods. Numerical simulations are conducted to demonstrate the improvement of the proposed algorithm.

Introduction

Direction of arrival (DOA) estimation problem has been extensively studied and used in the field of array signal processing. Most of existing investigations on DOA estimation are mainly exploiting the conventional arrays that the inter-elements spacing is limited to the typical half-wavelength.

Recently, the coprime linear array (CLA) has been proposed and the basic features of one-dimensional and two-dimensional coprime arrays have been thoroughly exploited [1-3]. The CLA makes it possible to sample the spatial signals in a sparse way, and consequently various useful properties can be obtained. The most distinguishing property is autocorrelation of signals can be estimated in a much denser spacing other than the physically sparse sampling spacing.

Actually, in communication systems, noncircular signals have been widely used, such as amplitude modulation (AM) and binary phase shift keying (BPSK) signals [4-5]. Noncircular signals have aroused attentions in the field of array signal processing and the noncircular feature has been widely used to enhance the DOA estimation performance.

In this paper, we combine the noncircular property and CLA to increase the DOF and enhance the DOA estimation performance. We investigate the problem of noncircular DOA estimation for CLA by the proposed "NC-ESPRIT". The proposed algorithm increase the degree of freedom, enhance the performance of angle estimation, achieves higher angle resolution and identifies more targets than conventional methods.

Notations: Lowercase (capital) bold symbols denote vector (matrix).( )*, ( )T denote complex

conjugation and transpose, while( )H, ( ) 1 denote conjugate-transpose, inverse matrix, respectively.

 

diag v stands for a diagonal matrix whose diagonal is a vectorv. In

 

 , Re

 

 denote the logarithm, and the real operator. E



 presents the statistical expectation. det{} stands for the determinant of

matrix. IM stands for an MM identity matrix and 0M N is a zero matrix with MN. angle( )

(2)

Data Model

…… / 2

M

/ 2

N

/ 2

M

/ 2

N

the k-th source

Subarray 1 Subarray 2

k

[image:2.612.202.419.91.212.2]

Figure 1. An example of the CLA.

Consider a CLA consists of two uniform linear subarrays with M and N sensors, respectively, where M and N are coprime integers. As the two subarrays share the first sensor at the zero-th position, the

total number of sensors is M N 1. The subarray with M sensors (subarray 1) has the inter-element

spacing N/2, while the subarray with N sensors (subarray 2) has the inter-element spacing M/2.

Figure 1 gives an example of a CLA.

Assume that there are K far-field, uncorrelated narrow-band signals impinging on a CLA from

different angles 

 1, , ,2 K

as shown in Figure 1, where k is the elevation angle of k-th

source, k1, , K , and Kmin

M N,

. The noise is additive independent identically distributed

Gaussian with zero mean and variance 2, independent of signals. The steering vector corresponding

to the k-th source for subarray 1 and subarray 2 can be expressed by vector a1( )k and a2( )k ,

- sin ( 1) sin 1( ) 1, k, , k

T

j N j M N

k e e

   

  

a  (1)

- sin ( 1) sin 2( ) 1, k, , k

T

j M j N M

k e e

   

  

a  (2)

We just consider the signal of maximum noncircular rate in this paper, as for the definition of noncircular signals [5], the vector of strictly second-order noncircular signals can be expressed as

 

t  0

 

t t1, ,L

s Ψs  (3)

where

 

1 0

K

t  

s  , Ψdiag e

j1,ej2, ,ejK

is a diagonal matrix with

k

 being the noncircular phase of the k-th signal, and L is the number of snapshots. Then, the received signal vector of

subarray 1 and subarray 2 can be defined as

 

   

1 t  1 0 tt t1, ,L

x A Ψs n  (4)

 

   

2 t  2 0 tt t1, ,L

x A Ψs n (5)

where  -1 1

MK

A  and  -1 2

MK

A  are the steering matrixes of subarray 1 and subarray 2 defined as A1 a1

 

1 , , a1

 

K  and A2  a2

 

1 , , a2

 

K .

 

1 K

t  

s  is the narrow-band noncircular

signal vector,

 

K1

t  

n  denotes the additive white Gaussian noise and E

   

H T 2 M

t t

  

n nI .

DOA Estimation Based on Combined ESPRIT

NC-ESPRIT Algorithm for DOA Estimation with Subarrays

(3)

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

1 * * * 0 * 1 0 0

1 1 1 1 1

t t

t t t t

t t

     

 

 

   

x A Ψ n

y s B s n

J x J A Ψ J n (6)

where 1

0 1

=

1 0

M M

 

 

 

 

 

J  , 1

1 * *

1 1        A Ψ B

J A Ψ , denotes the extended direction matrix of subarray 1. Let

1 1( , ) 1 1 1( , ) 2 2 1( , ) k k

B b bb , where

1 1 * 1 ( ) ( , )= ( ) k k j k

k k j

k e e              a b a (7)

The covariance matrix of the extended data model can be expressed as

H 2 1 1 S 1 n 2M

R B R B I (8)

where S

   

H

t t

 

 

RE s s is the source covariance matrix. Applying eigen-decomposition to the covariance matrices (8) yields

H H

1= s1 s s1+ n1 n n1

R U Λ U U Λ U (9)

Since the extended direction matrix B1 and signal subspace span the same space, there exist

nonsingular matrices T , makes

s1 1

U B T (10)

Define

 1

1 0 0

0 1 0

x

M M

 

 

  

 

 

J   and

 1

0 1 0

0 0 1

y

M M

 

 

  

 

 

J   .

Define two selection matrix x a x         J J

J and

y b y         J J J .

Partition the extended steering matrix B1 as

11 2 1

12

=  M K

 

 

B B

B  (11)

Then J Ba 1 means to get the front M1 rows of B11 and B12, J Bb 1 means to get the last M 1

rows of B11 and B12.

From [5-6], the direction matrix satisfies rotational invariance

1 1= 1

a b

J BJ B (12)

where 1 1 k j j e e                     

 is a diagonal matrix which contain DOA information with

sin

k N k

   .

According to (10) and (12), we obtain

1

s1 1 = s1

a b

J U TT J U (13)

define

1

1 1

T T

  (14)

(4)

 

+

1 J Ua s1 J Ub s1

 (15)

and

+

 

1

s1 = s1 s1 s1

H H

a a a a

J U J U J U J U , 1 has the same eigenvalues with 1. Perform the EVD

of 1, which can be written as

1

H

U U

  (16)

where U

u1, ,uK

, diag

1,,K

. It is worth noting that the eigenvalues of 1 in  are

corresponding to the diagonal elements of 1, and the eigenvectors of 1 in U are estimates of the

column vectors in matrix B1.

From (1), the elevation angle of k-th source can be estimated by

= arcsin( ( ) 2k )

k

angle k

N N

 

  (17)

where ˆk is the estimate of k, k0,1 , N1, so there are totally N ambiguous angles of k-th

source on subarray 1.

Similarly, we can obtain M ambiguous angles of k-th source on subarray 2 using the same

method.

In practice, the covariance matrix R1 is usually obtained by

 H

1 1 1 1

1

(t) (t)

L

t

L

R y y (18)

where L is the snapshot number, therefore, the correct estimations will not be strictly overlapped,

and the DOA is estimated by averaging two closest solutions,

 1 2

, 1, ,

2

k k

k k K

 

     (19)

where 1k and 2k denote the corresponding angles of the two closest solutions of the two

decomposed subarrays.

Till now, we have presented the combined NC-ESPRIT based DOA estimation algorithm of noncircular signals for coprime linear array. The major steps can be summarized as follows:

(1) Construct the extended sample array output matrix y according to (6). (2) compute Rˆ according to (18) and perform the EVD of Rˆ .

(3) Construct J Ua s1 and J Ub s1, compute M according to (15).

(4) perform EVD of M and estimate the ambiguous elevation angles via (17).

(5) Select the K nearest ambiguous angles as the estimate DOAs.

Simulation Results

(5)

0 10 20 30 10-3

10-2 10-1

DOA Estimation

SNR(dB)

R

M

SE

(degr

ee)

ESPRIT for circular ESPRIT for noncircular

0 10 20 30

10-2 100

DOA Estimation

SNR(dB)

R

M

SE

(degr

ee)

[image:5.612.137.473.66.237.2]

NC-ESPRIT for ULA CRB for ULA NC-ESPRIT for CLA CRB for CLA

Figure 2. RMSE performance comparison versus

circular and noncircular sources. Figure 3. RMSE performance comparison versus different array geometry.

Using Noncircular Features to improve DOA Estimation Performance

In Figure 2, we compared the DOA estimation performance of circular and noncircular sources for CLA. Assume that there are K=2 noncircular signals impinging on the CLA with elevation angles being = 10 30

 ,

and the noncircular phases being = 5 15

 ,

with M=5, N=7, L=300. From Figure

2 we can see that by introducing noncircular property, the DOA estimation performance of noncircular sources is much better than that of circular sources.

0 10 20 30

10-3 10-2 10-1

DOA Estimation

SNR(dB)

R

M

SE

(d

eg

re

e)

[image:5.612.226.387.373.529.2]

N=4, M=3 N=4, M=5 N=4, M=7

Figure 4. DOA estimation performance comparison versus M.

Comparison RMSE Performance Versus Different Array Geometry

In this simulation, we assume that there are K=2 noncircular signals impinging on a ULA and a CLA. For fair comparison, the ULA has M N 1 sensors. Figure 3 indicates the RMSE performance of

the NC-ESPRIT for ULA and NC-ESPRIT for CLA. The CRB is plotted as a benchmark. It is illustrated in Figure 3 that the proposed methods has better DOA estimation performance on CLA than on ULA.

Comparison of DOA Estimation RMSE Versus Different Parameters

(6)

Conclusions

In this paper, we proposed the NC-ESPRIT method for the DOA estimation of noncircular signals. Compared with the conventional ESPRIT method for circular signal, the proposed method has better estimation performance, increase the degree of freedom, and identifies more targets than conventional methods by exploiting the noncircular property. Numerical simulation results verify the effectiveness and improvement of the proposed method.

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by China NSF Grants (61371169, 61601167), the open research fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University (No.2015D030), Jiangsu NSF (BK20161489), the open research fund of State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University (No. K201826), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NO:NE2017103).

References

[1] S. Marcos, A. Marsal, M. Benidir, “The propagator method for source bearing estimation,” Signal Processing, vol. 42, no.2, pp. 121-138, 1995.

[2] P. Stoica, P. Händel, and T. Söderström. "Study of Capon method for array signal processing." Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 14, no.6, pp. 749-770, 1995.

[3] P.P. Vaidyanathan and P. Pal, "Sparse sensing with co-prime samplers and arrays," IEEE Trnsactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 573-586, 2011

[4] Chengwei Zhou, Zhiguo Shi, Yujie Gu, Xuemin Shen. "DECOM: DOA estimation with combined Capon for coprime array", 2013 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing, Hangzhou, China, Oct. 2013, pp. 1–5

[5] Xueqiang Chen, Chenghua Wang, Xiaofei Zhang. "DOA and Noncircular Phase Estimation of Noncircular Signal via an Improved Noncircular Rotational Invariance Propagator Method", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015,

Figure

Figure 1. An example of the CLA.
Figure 4. DOA estimation performance comparison versus M.

References

Related documents

Therefore, the objective of this study is to perform a descriptive analysis regarding eating patterns and biophysical conditions of previously diagnosed and

This project mainly deals with Computer Aided Diagnosis System (CAD) for early detection of lung cancer nodules from the Chest Computer Tomography (CT) image using MFPCM,

A methodology to determine the functional workspace of a 6R A methodology to determine the functional workspace of a 6R robot using forward kinematics and geometrical methods

Figure A.4 Outer cylinder hoop stress distribution for shrink fit model #2 with 2400 elements.. Figure A.5 Outer cylinder radial stress distribution for shrink fit model #7

Direct digital frequency synthesis (DDFS) based on numerically controlled oscillators (NCO) is an established method for generating quasi-periodic sinusoid signals at

As a result, hierarchical linear modeling (HLM6) was conducted to determine the effects of time (i.e., baseline, mid-, and post- test) on individual participants' perceptions

A fallow-area field experiment was conducted at three locations in North Carolina to determine control of Italian ryegrass by imazamox as affected by imazamox rate, weed size

national women’s hockey team, and how the treatment of female hockey players in the Canadian.. media, and in the eyes of the Canadian public, differs from the treatment of male