• No results found

Selection of Appropriate Ring Traveller Number for Different Count of Cotton Hosiery Yarn

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Selection of Appropriate Ring Traveller Number for Different Count of Cotton Hosiery Yarn"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Selection of Appropriate Ring Traveller Number for

Different Count of Cotton Hosiery Yarn

1

Jamal Hossen,

2

Subrata Kumar Saha

Department of Textile Engineering Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology 141-142, Love Road, Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh

Abstract-- Traveller has a great impact on yarn quality parameters specially hairiness. Yarn quality varies due to different traveller number. The traveller imparts twist to the yarn and enables winding of the yarn on the cop. However, cooperating assembly, the spindle is required for the winding operation. High contact pressure (up to 35 N/mm2) is generated between the ring and traveller during winding, mainly due to centrifugal force. This research was established according to yarn parameter of hairiness, U%, IPI, i.e. imperfection index and end breakage rate per 1000 spindle-hr. It is very important for the technologist to understand this and act on them to optimize the yarn production. Specific number of traveller should be used for a particular count of yarn.

Index Term-- Traveller number, carded yarn, combed yarn, Uster Tester, hosiery yarn.

I. INTRODUCTION

The ring and traveller combination is effectively a twisting and winding mechanism [3]. Although it is very minute in appearance, it plays an important role in spinning operation [2]. Several investigations have been carried out on the influence of the ring traveller [4]. For a given yarn count, the longer the fibers, the fewer the number per unit length of a given yarn count, and this is reflected in the yarn hairiness. Consequently, there moving of short fibers by combing results in combed yarns being much less hairy than carded yarns of equivalent count [3]. In most cases, the limit to productivity of the ring spinning machine is defined by the traveller in interdependence with the ring, and yarn. The following shapes are in use in the short-staple spinning mills: (i) C-traveller (ii) Flat or oval traveller (iii) Elliptical traveller (iv) N-traveller (v) SU-traveller [1]. Usually, C-traveller is used in short-staple spinning mills. C-traveller and Kanai brand were used in this work.

II. MATERIALS AND METHOD

Formerly in the United Kingdom, the term hosiery was used in the generic sense of all types of knitted fabrics and goods made up there from. Combed, super carded and carded yarns are all used extensively for knitting [6]. In this study 26/1 Ne and 30/1 Ne carded hosiery and 24/1 Ne and 34/1 Ne combed hosiery yarn were made from roving of hank 0.75. For both carded and combed yarns, twist multiplier were 3.6 and 3.5

(2)

Comparative chart of traveller weights [5]

Table A

Travel. No.

R+F ISO-Nr.

Bracker

ISO-Nr. Carter ISO-Nr. Kanai

*

ISO-Nr.

Lighter 15/0 14.0 15.0 22.7 16.6

14/0 15.0 16.0 24.3 18.3

13/0 16.0 17.0 26 20.0

12/0 18.0 18.0 27.5 21.6

11/0 19.0 20.0 29 23.4

10/0 20.0 22.4 31 25.0

9/0 22.4 23.6 32 26.8

8/0 23.6 25.0 34 28.5

7/0 26.5 28.0 36 30.2

6/0 30.0 31.5 39 32.2

5/0 31.5 35.5 42 35.1

4/0 35.5 40 45 38.3

3/0 40 45 49 42.2

2/0 45 50 52 48.3

1/0 50 56 58 54.6

1 60 63 65 62.2

2 71 71 71 73.6

3 80 80 78 81.0

4 85 90 84 87.7

5 95 95 91 95.3

6 106 100 104 108.8

7 112 112 117 121.8

8 125 125 130 135.9

9 140 140 149 154.4

10 160 160 168 174.8

11 180 180 194 199.0

12 200 200 214 219.8

13 224 224 233 237.8

14 236 250 253 258.7

Heavier 15 250 265 272 277.1

(3)

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Count and traveller number wise Uster test report and end breakage rate per 1000 spindle-hr for 26/1 Ne carded hosiery yarn

Table I

Traveller Number U%

CVm

% Hairiness

Thin (-50%) /Km

Thick (+50%) /Km

Neps (+200%)

/Km

IPI

EBR/ 1000 spindle-hr

1 10.13 12.88 5.57 0.3 66.3 91.3 157.9 55

1/0 10.09 12.98 5.32 1.0 81.8 94.0 157.9 50

2/0 10.48 13.33 5.54 1.8 86.5 103.8 192.1 61

3/0 10.54 13.35 5.49 1.9 85.7 102.9 190.5 61

4/0 10.55 13.45 5.62 1.8 87.4 104.3 193.5 64

Fig. 1. Traveller number Vs U% Fig. 2. Traveller number Vs hairiness

Fig. 3. Traveller number Vs imperfection Fig. 4. Traveller number Vs index (IPI) EBR/1000 spindle-hr

The figure 1 to 4 show that U%, hairiness, IPI and end breakage rate are the lowest for traveller number 1/0. With respect to above four quality parameters the best result is in this traveller number. So it can be concluded that in case of

26/1 Ne carded hosiery yarn, traveller number 1/0 is appropriate.

(4)

Table II

Traveller Number U%

CVm

% Hairiness

Thin (-50%)

/Km

Thick (+50%) /Km

Neps (+200%)

/Km

IPI

EBR/ 1000 spindle-hr

1 11.68 14.85 5.20 4.2 172.3 243.5 420.0 58

1/0 11.65 14.81 5.21 4.0 171.5 241.8 417.3 52

2/0 11.34 14.55 5.08 3.9 172.3 223.0 399.2 48

3/0 11.52 14.65 5.43 4.3 178.0 226.3 408.6 59

4/0 11.58 14.71 5.57 4.7 179.2 229.4 413.3 62

Fig. 5. Traveller number Vs U% Fig. 6. Traveller number Vs hairiness

Fig. 7. Traveller number Vs imperfection Fig. 8. Traveller number Vs Index (IPI) EBR/1000 spindle-hr

The figure 5 to 8 show that U%, hairiness, IPI and end breakage rate are the lowest for traveller number 2/0. With respect to above four quality parameters the best result is in this traveller number. So it can be concluded that in case of 30/1 Ne carded hosiery yarn, traveller number 2/0 is

(5)

Table III

Traveller Number U%

CVm

% Hairiness

Thin (-50%)

/Km

Thick (+50%) /Km

Neps (+200%)

/Km

IPI

EBR/ 1000 spindle-hr

2 7.82 9.88 5.07 0.0 8.5 19.0 27.5 54

1 7.65 9.64 5.63 0.0 7.3 17.8 25.1 47

1/0 7.65 9.64 5.02 0.0 6.0 15.8 21.8 43

2/0 7.79 9.71 5.92 0.0 7.8 16.5 24.3 49

3/0 7.77 9.59 5.89 0.0 8.5 17.4 25.9 53

Fig. 9. Traveller number Vs U% Fig. 10. Traveller number Vs hairiness

Fig. 11. Traveller number Vs imperfection Fig. 12. Traveller number Vs Index (IPI) EBR/1000 spindle-hr

The figure 9 to 12 show that U%, hairiness, IPI and end breakage rate are the lowest for traveller number 1/0. With respect to above four quality parameters the best result is in this traveller number. So it can be concluded that in case of 24/1 Ne combed hosiery yarn, traveller number 1/0 is appropriate.

(6)

Table IV

Traveller Number U%

CVm

% Hairiness

Thin (-50%)

/Km

Thick (+50%) /Km

Neps (+200%)

/Km

IPI

EBR/ 1000 spindle-hr

1/0 8.99 11.48 4.78 0.0 10.4 33.7 44.1 53

2/0 9.04 11.38 4.65 0.0 10.5 32.3 42.8 52

3/0 8.95 11.27 4.52 0.3 7.0 24.0 25.0 47

4/0 8.95 11.27 4.54 0.3 9.0 25.3 34.6 54

5/0 9.98 11.35 4.54 0.5 9.9 29.6 40.0 55

Fig. 13. Traveller number Vs U% Fig. 14. Traveller number Vs hairiness

Fig. 15. Traveller number Vs imperfection Fig. 16. Traveller number Vs index (IPI) EBR/1000 spindle-hr

The figure 13 to 16 show that U%, hairiness, IPI and end breakage rate are the lowest for traveller number 3/0. With respect to above four quality parameters the best result is in this traveller number. So it can be concluded that in case of 34/1 Ne combed hosiery yarn, traveller number 3/0 is appropriate.

(7)

using the different traveller number of specific brand against same count of carded, combed and compact cotton yarn.

REFERENCES

[1] Klein W., “Manual of Textile Technology” The Textile Institute. ISBN 0900739916.

[2] Pattabhiram T. K., “Essential Elements of Practical Cotton Spinning” Somaiya Publications Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, New Delhi. Fourth Edition 1997.

[3] Lawrence, Carl A. “Fundamentals of Spun Yarn Technology” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. ISBN 1-56676-821-7 (alk. paper).

[4] I. Usta, S. Canoglu, “Influence of Ring Traveller Weight and Coating on Hairiness of Acrylic Yarns” University of Marmara Faculty of Technical Education, Department of Textile Studies, Göztepe, 81040 Istanbul, Turkey.

[5] Technical Manual of “Reiners + Furst, Rings and Travellers” Reiners + Furst GmbH u. Co. KG.

Figure

Fig. 3. Traveller number Vs imperfection index (IPI)                                                                        EBR/1000 spindle-hr
Fig. 5. Traveller number Vs U%                                Fig. 6. Traveller number Vs hairiness
Fig. 9. Traveller number Vs U%                                       Fig. 10. Traveller number Vs hairiness
Fig. 13. Traveller number Vs U%                              Fig. 14. Traveller number Vs hairiness

References

Related documents

Keywords: maximum power point tracking (MPPT), photovoltaic (PV), boost converter, fuzzy logic controller, solar car..

Assessment of their effectiveness Inability to determine and monitor the effectiveness of seawater treatment in regard to CE-based activities of chlorination, deaeration,

“Public Management Reform and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Assessment of the UK Labour Government’s Public Service Improvement Strategy.” Journal of Policy Analysis

It is not difficult to see that training young students to love the great motherland, the Chinese nation, Chinese culture, the Chinese Communist Party and

This paper is based on a comparative approach and focuses on given a run-down of the successes recorded in conflict resolution using human speech production in

5 show that the observed entropy change was lower than the values of theoretical entropy changes for both of the mobile and localized adsorption models in the entire range

In this work, a new model based on four phases (oil, asphaltene, gas and water phase) and single well model in a cylindrical coordinate was developed to account

RT-qPCR analysis demon- strated that gene expression of MMP3 and MMP9 was increased following IL-1 β stimulation ( p < 0.001, Fig. 1a ), and the induction was especially