• No results found

4,4′,4′′ (1,3,5 Triazine 2,4,6 tri­yl)tripyridinium trinitrate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "4,4′,4′′ (1,3,5 Triazine 2,4,6 tri­yl)tripyridinium trinitrate"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o1344

Zhuet al. C

18H15N63+3NO3 doi:10.1107/S160053680604431X Acta Cryst.(2007). E63, o1344–o1346

Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

4,4

000

,4

000000

-(1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triyl)tripyridinium

trinitrate

Shou-Rong Zhu,a* Wan-Dong Chen,b Hong-Jian Zhao,aMin Shaocand Ming-Xing Lia

aDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science,

Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, People’s Republic of China,bDepartment of Chemistry,

Jining Teachers’ College, Qufu 273100, People’s Republic of China, andcInstrumental

Analysis and Research Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 273 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.003 A˚

Rfactor = 0.033

wRfactor = 0.082 Data-to-parameter ratio = 6.8

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

Received 6 September 2006 Accepted 23 October 2006

#2007 International Union of Crystallography

All rights reserved

Reaction of 2,4,6-tris(4-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (tpt) with excess nitric acid in an aqueous solution affords the title compound, C18H15N6

3+ 3NO3

. The torsion angles between adjacent aromatic rings are much larger than those of neutral tpt. All three pyridine N atoms are protonated.

Comment

The trigonal tridentate ligand 2,4,6-tris(4-pyridyl)-1,3,5-tria-zine has been of special interest in recent years (Fujitaet al., 2005). Tpt is anexo-tridentate ligand; the N atoms of the three pyridyl groups can bind only to different metal atoms. Its rigidity and triangular geometry can lead to the formation of porous frameworks enclosing nanoporous cages (Yoshizawaet al.2004; Kusukawa & Fujita, 2002), cavities (Sunet al., 2002; Yoshizawa et al., 2005), chambers (Batten et al., 1995) and channels (Ohmoriet al., 2005). The crystal structure of neutral tpt was reported previously by Janczaket al.(2003). We report here the crystal structure of its nitrate salt, (I).

As shown in Fig. 1, the three 4-pyridyl rings bind to the triazine ring through atoms C1, C2 and C3. There are three NO3

[image:1.610.256.406.398.543.2]

ions in the structure. In neutral tpt, all four six-membered rings are essentially coplanar, with a maximum torsion angle of 7.44 (10)(Janczaket al., 2003), while in (I), the torsion angles between adjacent aromatic rings vary from 7.5 (3) to 14.8 (2), somewhat larger than in tpt. C—N distances of 1.339–1.344 A˚ are observed in the triazine rings and 1.332–1.337 A˚ in the pyridine rings in tpt. The triazine C— N distances of 1.329 (3)–1.339 (3) A˚ in the title compound are slightly shorter than in tpt, thus ruling out the possibility of the triazine ring being protonated. The C—N distances of 1.327 (3)–1.340 (3) A˚ in the pyridine rings in (I) are essentially the same as in tpt.

(2)

a well defined layer form through–interaction; the distance between layers is 3.317 A˚ . In (I), the distorted H3tpt3+ and

nitrate groups link different layers through hydrogen bonding. The inter-layer distance is 3.298 A˚ in (I), which is slightly shorter than that in tpt. The hydrogen-bonding distances and

angles are listed in Table 1. Clearly, there are hydrogen-bond interactions between pyridine N and nitrate O atoms, which further indicate that the H atoms bind to pyridine N atoms rather than triazine N atoms.

Experimental

The title compound was prepared by adding solid tpt (31 mg, 0.1 mmol) to a 50 ml beaker containing 10 ml of water and two drops of concentrated HNO3. The mixture was warmed to give a clear

solution and then filtered to remove impurities. The mixture was allowed to stand for several days at room temperature. X-ray diffraction quality crystals of (I) formed in 60% yield.

Crystal data

C18H15N63+3NO3

Mr= 501.39

Monoclinic,Cc a= 9.8940 (12) A˚ b= 21.637 (3) A˚ c= 9.9734 (12) A˚ = 109.671 (1)

V= 2010.4 (4) A˚3

Z= 4

MoKradiation = 0.14 mm1

T= 273 (2) K 0.400.200.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX-II area-detector diffractometer

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) Tmin= 0.948,Tmax= 0.973

6240 measured reflections 2300 independent reflections 2078 reflections withI> 2(I) Rint= 0.021

Refinement

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.033

wR(F2) = 0.082

S= 1.05 2300 reflections 338 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

max= 0.21 e A˚

3

min=0.21 e A˚

3

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

N6—H6A O4i 0.90 (3) 2.43 (3) 2.984 (3) 120 (3) N5—H5A O9ii

0.93 (4) 1.92 (4) 2.826 (3) 165 (3) N4—H4A O8iii

0.85 (4) 2.54 (4) 3.095 (3) 124 (3) N4—H4A O6iv

0.85 (4) 2.18 (4) 2.917 (3) 145 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i)x;yþ2;z1 2; (ii)xþ

1 2;yþ

1

2;z1; (iii)xþ1;yþ1;zþ 1 2; (iv) xþ1

2;yþ 3 2;zþ

1 2.

The pyridinium H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely (distances are in Table 1). The aromatic H atoms were constrained to ride on their parent C atoms, with a distance of 0.93 A˚ andUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). In the absence of significant

anom-alous scattering, Friedel pairs have been averaged.

Data collection:APEX2(Bruker, 2000); cell refinement:SAINT

(Bruker, 2000); data reduction:SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

SHELXTL(Sheldrick, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

The project was supported by the Development Foundation

of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, China.

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2007). E63, o1344–o1346 Zhuet al. C

[image:2.610.57.276.69.341.2] [image:2.610.48.295.376.652.2]

18H15N63+3NO3

o1345

Figure 1

The structure of the constituent ions of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.

Figure 2

(3)

Professor Weng Lin-Hong (Fudan University) is kindly acknowledged for assistance with the CIF.

References

Batten, S. R., Hoskins, B. F. & Robson, R. (1995).J. Am. Chem. Soc.117, 5385– 5386.

Bruker (2000).APEX2andSAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Fujita, M., Tominaga, M., Hori, A. & Therrien, B. (2005).Acc. Chem. Res.38, 371–380.

Janczak, J., S´ledz´, M. & Kubiak, R. (2003). J. Mol. Struct. 659, 71– 79.

Kusukawa, T. & Fujita, M. (2002).J. Am. Chem. Soc.124, 13576–13582. Ohmori, O., Kawano, M. & Fujita, M. (2005).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.44, 1962–

1964.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of

Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2000).SHELXTL. Version 6.1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Sun, W. Y., Kusukawa, T. & Fujita, M. (2002).J. Am. Chem. Soc.124, 11570– 11571.

Yoshizawa, M., Miyagi, S., Kawano, M., Ishiguro, K. & Fujita, M. (2004).J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 9172–9173.

Yoshizawa, M., Nakagawa, J., Kumazawa, K., Nagao, M., Kawano, M., Ozeki, T. & Fujita, M. (2005).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.44, 1810–1813.

organic papers

o1346

Zhuet al. C

(4)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o1344–o1346

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o1344–o1346 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680604431X]

4,4

,4

′′

-(1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triyl)tripyridinium trinitrate

Shou-Rong Zhu, Wan-Dong Chen, Hong-Jian Zhao, Min Shao and Ming-Xing Li

4,4′,4′′-(1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triyl)tripyridinium trinitrate

Crystal data

C18H15N63+·3NO3− Mr = 501.39 Monoclinic, Cc a = 9.8940 (12) Å

b = 21.637 (3) Å

c = 9.9734 (12) Å

β = 109.671 (1)°

V = 2010.4 (4) Å3 Z = 4

F(000) = 1032

Dx = 1.657 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 2778 reflections

θ = 2.4–27.1°

µ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 273 K

Rhomb, pale_brown 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX-II area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin = 0.948, Tmax = 0.973

6240 measured reflections 2300 independent reflections 2078 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.021

θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.4° h = −11→12

k = −28→27

l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 wR(F2) = 0.082 S = 1.05 2300 reflections 338 parameters 2 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0501P)2 + 0.2046P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001 Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3

Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 Extinction coefficient: 0.0040 (6)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full

(5)

supporting information

sup-2

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o1344–o1346

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 &gt; σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

C1 0.7969 (2) 0.76683 (10) 0.0970 (2) 0.0245 (5)

C2 0.7684 (2) 0.86961 (10) 0.0974 (2) 0.0244 (5)

C3 0.8598 (2) 0.81840 (10) 0.3040 (2) 0.0240 (5)

C4 0.9157 (3) 0.81854 (10) 0.4621 (2) 0.0243 (5)

C5 0.9556 (3) 0.87405 (10) 0.5364 (2) 0.0287 (5)

H5 0.9484 0.9112 0.4876 0.034*

C6 1.0056 (3) 0.87302 (13) 0.6829 (3) 0.0357 (6)

H6 1.0329 0.9095 0.7342 0.043*

C7 0.9785 (3) 0.76513 (12) 0.6828 (3) 0.0361 (6)

H7 0.9869 0.7288 0.7347 0.043*

C8 0.9289 (3) 0.76342 (11) 0.5362 (3) 0.0314 (5)

H8 0.9047 0.7261 0.4880 0.038*

C9 0.7775 (2) 0.70777 (10) 0.0144 (2) 0.0236 (5)

C10 0.7965 (3) 0.65085 (10) 0.0827 (3) 0.0303 (5)

H10 0.8307 0.6484 0.1816 0.036*

C11 0.7637 (3) 0.59791 (11) 0.0007 (3) 0.0358 (6)

H11 0.7726 0.5594 0.0441 0.043*

C12 0.7053 (3) 0.65594 (12) −0.2084 (3) 0.0381 (6)

H12 0.6767 0.6568 −0.3073 0.046*

C13 0.7330 (3) 0.71033 (11) −0.1331 (3) 0.0312 (5)

H13 0.7222 0.7481 −0.1800 0.037*

C14 0.7142 (3) 0.92783 (9) 0.0180 (2) 0.0259 (5)

C15 0.6278 (3) 0.92505 (11) −0.1242 (3) 0.0341 (6)

H15 0.6087 0.8874 −0.1720 0.041*

C16 0.5708 (3) 0.97917 (13) −0.1930 (3) 0.0403 (6)

H16 0.5123 0.9783 −0.2881 0.048*

C17 0.6828 (3) 1.03675 (11) 0.0123 (3) 0.0367 (6)

H17 0.6997 1.0751 0.0570 0.044*

C18 0.7437 (3) 0.98466 (10) 0.0863 (3) 0.0308 (5)

H18 0.8038 0.9873 0.1807 0.037*

H4A 1.048 (4) 0.8167 (18) 0.841 (5) 0.071 (12)*

H5A 0.696 (4) 0.5691 (17) −0.204 (4) 0.062 (10)*

H6A 0.558 (4) 1.0645 (15) −0.179 (3) 0.047 (9)*

N1 0.8492 (2) 0.76378 (8) 0.2383 (2) 0.0264 (4)

N2 0.7533 (2) 0.81794 (8) 0.0208 (2) 0.0266 (4)

N3 0.8226 (2) 0.87272 (8) 0.23940 (19) 0.0263 (4)

N4 1.0145 (3) 0.81930 (11) 0.7506 (2) 0.0386 (5)

N5 0.7191 (3) 0.60213 (10) −0.1409 (3) 0.0381 (5)

N6 0.5996 (3) 1.03253 (10) −0.1234 (3) 0.0387 (5)

(6)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o1344–o1346

N8 0.6079 (2) 0.80094 (9) 0.5292 (2) 0.0297 (4)

N9 0.0472 (3) 0.04132 (9) 0.5145 (2) 0.0331 (4)

O1 0.3186 (3) 0.87619 (10) −0.0780 (2) 0.0583 (6)

O2 0.3768 (2) 0.96804 (9) 0.0031 (2) 0.0492 (5)

O3 0.4505 (3) 0.88892 (9) 0.1404 (2) 0.0573 (6)

O4 0.5819 (3) 0.83154 (9) 0.4186 (2) 0.0490 (6)

O5 0.6594 (3) 0.82693 (8) 0.6469 (2) 0.0498 (6)

O6 0.5829 (2) 0.74439 (8) 0.5232 (2) 0.0428 (5)

O7 0.0043 (3) 0.00839 (9) 0.4068 (2) 0.0511 (6)

O8 0.0252 (3) 0.09767 (8) 0.5067 (2) 0.0505 (5)

O9 0.1116 (3) 0.01682 (9) 0.6336 (2) 0.0508 (6)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

C1 0.0300 (11) 0.0189 (10) 0.0229 (11) 0.0003 (9) 0.0066 (9) −0.0023 (9)

C2 0.0303 (12) 0.0190 (10) 0.0222 (11) 0.0022 (9) 0.0068 (9) 0.0011 (8)

C3 0.0291 (12) 0.0204 (11) 0.0214 (11) −0.0009 (9) 0.0071 (9) 0.0002 (8)

C4 0.0272 (11) 0.0237 (11) 0.0190 (11) 0.0024 (9) 0.0037 (9) 0.0011 (9)

C5 0.0344 (13) 0.0249 (11) 0.0230 (12) 0.0003 (10) 0.0047 (10) −0.0002 (9)

C6 0.0415 (14) 0.0370 (13) 0.0238 (12) −0.0026 (11) 0.0045 (10) −0.0059 (10)

C7 0.0450 (15) 0.0343 (13) 0.0260 (13) 0.0060 (12) 0.0080 (11) 0.0099 (10)

C8 0.0408 (14) 0.0244 (11) 0.0264 (13) 0.0002 (10) 0.0079 (11) 0.0015 (10)

C9 0.0280 (11) 0.0182 (10) 0.0222 (11) 0.0016 (8) 0.0053 (9) −0.0021 (8)

C10 0.0364 (13) 0.0212 (11) 0.0307 (13) 0.0028 (10) 0.0080 (10) 0.0011 (10)

C11 0.0421 (14) 0.0189 (11) 0.0440 (16) 0.0038 (10) 0.0113 (12) −0.0018 (10)

C12 0.0493 (16) 0.0324 (13) 0.0278 (14) 0.0005 (11) 0.0067 (12) −0.0086 (10)

C13 0.0410 (13) 0.0236 (11) 0.0260 (13) 0.0011 (10) 0.0073 (10) −0.0026 (9)

C14 0.0348 (12) 0.0210 (10) 0.0214 (11) 0.0029 (9) 0.0089 (9) 0.0021 (9)

C15 0.0470 (14) 0.0306 (12) 0.0224 (12) 0.0074 (11) 0.0088 (11) 0.0018 (9)

C16 0.0495 (16) 0.0433 (15) 0.0251 (14) 0.0124 (12) 0.0085 (12) 0.0126 (11)

C17 0.0429 (15) 0.0226 (11) 0.0465 (16) 0.0028 (10) 0.0174 (13) 0.0049 (11)

C18 0.0376 (13) 0.0214 (11) 0.0313 (14) 0.0009 (10) 0.0090 (11) 0.0003 (9)

N1 0.0367 (11) 0.0204 (9) 0.0187 (9) 0.0007 (8) 0.0047 (8) 0.0007 (7)

N2 0.0367 (11) 0.0193 (9) 0.0193 (10) 0.0007 (8) 0.0036 (8) −0.0006 (7)

N3 0.0365 (11) 0.0207 (9) 0.0185 (10) −0.0008 (8) 0.0049 (8) 0.0003 (7)

N4 0.0451 (13) 0.0503 (14) 0.0158 (10) 0.0010 (11) 0.0040 (9) 0.0009 (10)

N5 0.0437 (13) 0.0259 (11) 0.0412 (14) −0.0013 (9) 0.0097 (10) −0.0135 (10)

N6 0.0446 (13) 0.0279 (11) 0.0464 (15) 0.0130 (10) 0.0190 (11) 0.0182 (10)

N7 0.0388 (11) 0.0260 (10) 0.0328 (11) −0.0023 (9) 0.0098 (9) −0.0065 (9)

N8 0.0375 (11) 0.0252 (9) 0.0237 (10) −0.0018 (9) 0.0069 (8) −0.0034 (8)

N9 0.0453 (12) 0.0257 (9) 0.0277 (10) −0.0055 (9) 0.0116 (9) −0.0041 (9)

O1 0.0785 (16) 0.0408 (11) 0.0368 (12) −0.0042 (11) −0.0056 (11) −0.0105 (9)

O2 0.0620 (13) 0.0272 (9) 0.0537 (14) 0.0045 (9) 0.0134 (10) −0.0009 (9)

O3 0.0818 (17) 0.0391 (11) 0.0328 (12) −0.0066 (11) −0.0048 (11) 0.0016 (9)

O4 0.0817 (16) 0.0318 (10) 0.0225 (10) −0.0141 (9) 0.0032 (9) 0.0024 (7)

O5 0.0841 (16) 0.0344 (10) 0.0239 (10) −0.0056 (10) 0.0087 (10) −0.0085 (8)

(7)

supporting information

sup-4

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o1344–o1346

O7 0.0789 (16) 0.0358 (10) 0.0295 (11) −0.0085 (10) 0.0065 (10) −0.0098 (8)

O8 0.0728 (15) 0.0285 (9) 0.0422 (11) 0.0018 (9) 0.0087 (10) −0.0029 (9)

O9 0.0856 (16) 0.0334 (10) 0.0256 (10) −0.0018 (10) 0.0083 (10) −0.0008 (8)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—N2 1.329 (3) C12—C13 1.373 (3)

C1—N1 1.329 (3) C12—H12 0.930

C1—C9 1.497 (3) C13—H13 0.930

C2—N2 1.334 (3) C14—C18 1.388 (3)

C2—N3 1.336 (3) C14—C15 1.390 (3)

C2—C14 1.488 (3) C15—C16 1.378 (3)

C3—N3 1.331 (3) C15—H15 0.930

C3—N1 1.338 (3) C16—N6 1.328 (4)

C3—C4 1.485 (3) C16—H16 0.930

C4—C8 1.386 (3) C17—N6 1.329 (4)

C4—C5 1.397 (3) C17—C18 1.371 (3)

C5—C6 1.376 (3) C17—H17 0.930

C5—H5 0.930 C18—H18 0.930

C6—N4 1.332 (4) N4—H4A 0.85 (4)

C6—H6 0.930 N5—H5A 0.93 (4)

C7—N4 1.340 (4) N6—H6A 0.90 (3)

C7—C8 1.377 (4) N7—O1 1.233 (3)

C7—H7 0.930 N7—O2 1.241 (3)

C8—H8 0.930 N7—O3 1.254 (3)

C9—C13 1.387 (3) N8—O4 1.237 (3)

C9—C10 1.389 (3) N8—O5 1.246 (3)

C10—C11 1.381 (3) N8—O6 1.245 (2)

C10—H10 0.930 N9—O8 1.236 (3)

C11—N5 1.333 (4) N9—O7 1.239 (3)

C11—H11 0.930 N9—O9 1.260 (3)

C12—N5 1.328 (3)

N2—C1—N1 125.68 (19) C9—C13—H13 120.7

N2—C1—C9 116.02 (19) C18—C14—C15 119.7 (2)

N1—C1—C9 118.22 (19) C18—C14—C2 120.7 (2)

N2—C2—N3 125.23 (19) C15—C14—C2 119.6 (2)

N2—C2—C14 116.98 (19) C16—C15—C14 118.6 (2)

N3—C2—C14 117.73 (18) C16—C15—H15 120.7

N3—C3—N1 125.4 (2) C14—C15—H15 120.7

N3—C3—C4 117.09 (19) N6—C16—C15 119.9 (3)

N1—C3—C4 117.5 (2) N6—C16—H16 120.0

C8—C4—C5 119.8 (2) C15—C16—H16 120.0

C8—C4—C3 120.0 (2) N6—C17—C18 120.1 (2)

C5—C4—C3 120.2 (2) N6—C17—H17 120.0

C6—C5—C4 119.1 (2) C18—C17—H17 120.0

C6—C5—H5 120.5 C17—C18—C14 118.8 (2)

(8)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o1344–o1346

N4—C6—C5 119.4 (2) C14—C18—H18 120.6

N4—C6—H6 120.3 C1—N1—C3 114.44 (18)

C5—C6—H6 120.3 C1—N2—C2 114.68 (19)

N4—C7—C8 119.9 (2) C3—N3—C2 114.53 (18)

N4—C7—H7 120.1 C6—N4—C7 123.2 (2)

C8—C7—H7 120.1 C6—N4—H4A 122 (3)

C7—C8—C4 118.6 (2) C7—N4—H4A 115 (3)

C7—C8—H8 120.7 C12—N5—C11 122.5 (2)

C4—C8—H8 120.7 C12—N5—H5A 112 (2)

C13—C9—C10 119.8 (2) C11—N5—H5A 126 (2)

C13—C9—C1 119.0 (2) C16—N6—C17 122.9 (2)

C10—C9—C1 121.1 (2) C16—N6—H6A 112 (2)

C11—C10—C9 118.6 (2) C17—N6—H6A 125 (2)

C11—C10—H10 120.7 O1—N7—O2 120.7 (2)

C9—C10—H10 120.7 O1—N7—O3 119.4 (2)

N5—C11—C10 119.9 (2) O2—N7—O3 119.9 (2)

N5—C11—H11 120.1 O4—N8—O5 119.7 (2)

C10—C11—H11 120.1 O4—N8—O6 120.3 (2)

N5—C12—C13 120.4 (2) O5—N8—O6 120.0 (2)

N5—C12—H12 119.8 O8—N9—O7 120.7 (2)

C13—C12—H12 119.8 O8—N9—O9 119.8 (2)

C12—C13—C9 118.7 (2) O7—N9—O9 119.5 (2)

C12—C13—H13 120.7

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

N6—H6A···O4i 0.90 (3) 2.43 (3) 2.984 (3) 120 (3)

N5—H5A···O9ii 0.93 (4) 1.92 (4) 2.826 (3) 165 (3)

N4—H4A···O8iii 0.85 (4) 2.54 (4) 3.095 (3) 124 (3)

N4—H4A···O6iv 0.85 (4) 2.18 (4) 2.917 (3) 145 (4)

Figure

Fig. 2 shows that the packing in (I) is different from that intpt, possibly owing to protonation and distortion
Figure 1The structure of the constituent ions of (I), with displacement ellipsoidsdrawn at the 30% probability level.

References

Related documents

We call the poem generated by the generation module in one pass the draft, since the user may revise it for several times to collaboratively cre- ate a satisfying poem together with

Our analysis provides some idea about the distinct compartmentalization of the Indian credit market with respect to the disbursement of loan from various credit

In effect, we hypothesized that the unproductive expenditures depend on real, financial and demand variables which we captured in the movement of the economy- wide

We recast their tasks so that they only require a sentence embedding as input (two of their tasks also require word embeddings, polluting sentence- level evaluation), we extend

In this paper, we introduce a Low-rank Multi- modal Fusion method that performs multimodal fu- sion with modality-specific low-rank factors.. LMF scales linearly in the number

Based on the lag length, it could be suggested that the changes in world oil price and output of trade industries have immediate effect on currency appreciation,

In his most recent blog, Aaker still uses the same definition for brand equity but identifies only three elements or assets as the major dimensions of brand

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the total time duration and comfort equation of three different appliances used to manage the