• No results found

The To Complete Performance Index

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The To Complete Performance Index"

Copied!
31
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The To Complete

P f

I d

Performance Index

transforming project

…transforming project

performance

TCPI vs CPI

Walt Lipke

PMI - Oklahoma City Chapter 1.01.1 1.2 1.3 In d e x

TCPI CPI Threshold

+1 405 364 1594 [email protected]

www.earnedschedule.com

0.7 0.8 0.9

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

(2)

Abstract

Abstract

| The To Complete Performance Index (TCPI) from Earned Value Management describes the performance efficiency required to achieve a cost objective.

| Beyond its usual application, the TCPI indicator has a significant role in transforming project

has a significant role in transforming project performance to effect a project recovery. This virtually unknown aspect is the focus of this presentation.

(3)

Overview

Overview

| Introduction

| Evaluation of EAC | Further Examination | Further Examination

| Application to Project Recovery | Evaluating the Recovery Strategy | Schedule Analysis

(4)

Introduction

Introduction

| EVM provides a method of describing project performance numerically …a significant

improvement for assessing & reporting project improvement for assessing & reporting project status

| The most often used and best understood indicator from EVM is the Cost Performance Index, CPI = EV / AC

| CPI is a description of the efficiency of | CPI is a description of the efficiency of

achieving the accomplishment with respect to the cost investment made

(5)

Introduction

Introduction

| Whereas CPI describes the past, TCPI provides information about the future

| TCPI is defined as the work remaining to be | TCPI is defined as the work remaining to be

accomplished divided by the amount of unspent funding

| TCPI = (BAC – EV)/(TC – AC) | TCPI = (BAC – EV)/(TC – AC)

where TC = Target Cost or Desired Cost Outcome

| What does TCPI tell us?

The index value describes the cost

performance efficiency required for the

(6)

Evaluation of EAC

Evaluation of EAC

| Traditionally, TCPI is used by customers or oversight organizations to assess the

reasonableness of an estimated final cost or Estimate at Completion (EAC)

| For this application,

TCPI = (BAC – EV) / (EAC – AC) TCPI = (BAC – EV) / (EAC – AC)

The customer evaluates the EAC provided by the PM from the value of the TCPI computed

(7)

Evaluation of EAC

Evaluation of EAC

TCPI Value Predicted Outcome

≤ 1 00 A hi bl

≤ 1.00 Achievable

(8)

Evaluation of EAC

Evaluation of EAC

| When TCPI is equal to or less than 1.00, there is confidence that the EAC can be achieved

| Conversely when TCPI is equal to or greater | Conversely, when TCPI is equal to or greater

than 1.10 the project is considered to be “out of control;” the EAC is very likely unachievable

| Between the two declarative values, 1.00 and 1.10, the PM’s actions become ever more

critical to project success Management critical to project success. Management

intervention to improve cost performance very probably will be required to achieve the EAC

(9)

Evaluation of EAC

Evaluation of EAC

TCPI vs CPI TCPI vs CPI

1 3

TCPI CPI Threshold

1.1 1.2 1.3

x

TCPI Exceed Threshold @ 0.35

0.8 0.9 1.0

Inde

x

CPI = 0.850

0.7

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

(10)

Evaluation of EAC

Evaluation of EAC

| The planned final cost (BAC) will not be achieved if this performance, CPI = 0.850, continues

continues

| TCPI continually increases as the project

progresses, exceeding the threshold value of 1.10 at fraction complete of approximately 0.35 | The rate of TCPI increase becomes ever larger

as fraction complete increases as fraction complete increases.

(11)

Further Examination

Further Examination

| What is the evidence that when TCPI

>

1.10,

the project is irrecoverable?

| As far as I know there have not been any | As far as I know, there have not been any

empirical or theoretical studies to validate the claim.

| In the next few slides, we’ll look at the behavior of TCPI in more detail …and state my opinion

(12)

Further Examination

Further Examination

| A revealing view can be obtained using calculus …from TCPI in a different form:

TCPI = (1 EV%)/(CR CPI-1∗EV%) TCPI = (1 – EV%)/(CR – CPI 1∗EV%)

where CR (Cost Ratio) = TC / BAC

EV% = EV / BAC

| For notation simplicity:

y = TCPI, x = EV%, a = CR, b = CPI-1

| The equation to examine becomes: y = (1 – x)/(a – bx)

(13)

Further Examination

Further Examination

| As an example, let us analyze a project having cost performance which will not achieve the cost objective: CPI-1 = 1 20 CR = 1 10

cost objective: CPI 1.20, CR 1.10

| The point of interest is when TCPI equals the threshold value (1.10)

x = (ya – 1)/(yb -1)

= ((1.1 ∗ 1.1) – 1)/((1.1 ∗ 1.2) -1) 0 656

(14)

Further Examination

Further Examination

| What is the rate of increase of TCPI at the

threshold value (1.10)?

| TCPI rate of increase with respect to fraction | TCPI rate of increase with respect to fraction

complete can be examined using the first calculus derivative: dy/dx = (b – a)/(a – bx)2

| At the point of interest (TCPI = 1.10), the derivative can be evaluated:

dy/dx = (1 2 1 1)/(1 1 (1 2 ∗ 0 656))2

dy/dx = (1.2 – 1.1)/(1.1 – (1.2 ∗ 0.656))2

(15)

Further Examination

Further Examination

| What happens to the rate of increase of TCPI

when performance continues and fraction complete increases?

complete increases?

dy/dx EV%

1.024 0.656

2.500 0.750

1.479 0.700

(16)

Further Examination

Further Examination

| For modest increases in EV%, it is seen from the numbers in the table that dy/dx (i.e. the TCPI rate) has larger and larger rates of change

| Once the threshold is exceeded, there is little hope that management intervention can have hope that management intervention can have positive impact …the project is very rapidly becoming “out of control”

| Thus the threshold value of 1 10 for TCPI | Thus, the threshold value of 1.10 for TCPI

appears to be a reasonable criterion for making the assertion that the EAC put forth by the PM

(17)

Application to Project

Recovery

| PMs applying EVM possess early warning tools

z Forecast of final cost, IEAC = BAC / CPI

| As an example let’s examine a project using | As an example, let s examine a project using

the following data: CPI = 0.850, BAC = $1000, MR = $100

| What is projected for the future?

z If CPI does not improve, BAC will be exceeded

z IEAC = 1000 / 0 850 = $1176

z IEAC = 1000 / 0.850 = $1176

z MR will be consumed, IEAC > TAB

(18)

Application to Project

Recovery

| What is the PM’s prerogative when the project

is 80 percent complete?

| By calculating TCPI using TAB as the desired | By calculating TCPI using TAB as the desired

final cost and graphing it as shown previously, the answer is readily seen

| As observed in the next slide, the value of TCPI is so large it is nearly off the chart; the

computed value is 1 259 computed value is 1.259

(19)

Application to Project

Recovery

TCPI CPI TCPI vs CPI

TCPI CPI Threshold

1.1 1.2 1.3

x

TCPI = 1.259 @0.80 0.8 0.9 1.0 In d e x

CPI = 0.850

0.7 0.8

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Fraction Complete Fraction Complete

(20)

Application to Project

Recovery

| From our previous discussion, the PM knows that when TCPI ≥ 1.10 the project is regarded as irrecoverable and that additional funding is as irrecoverable and that additional funding is very likely needed

| In this instance, as uncomfortable as it may be, negotiation with the customer cannot be

avoided

| Does the PM make the same decision when the | Does the PM make the same decision when the

(21)

Application to Project

Recovery

| The simple answer is “No”

| At 30 percent complete, TCPI = 0.937, a good number yet the PM knows from IEAC that if the number, yet the PM knows from IEAC that if the current performance does not improve the

project will overrun the funding available (TAB) | However, with this value for TCPI, the PM has

an opportunity to take action thereby avoiding the overrun and the embarrassment of the the overrun …and the embarrassment of the impending negotiation if the present cost

(22)

Application to Project

Recovery

| What is the period of opportunity for the PM to

make a positive performance change?

| The PM has from the present status point until | The PM has from the present status point until

TCPI exceeds 1.10 to recover the project | Is the period of opportunity sufficient for p pp y

recovery to be successful?

(23)

Application to Project

Recovery

TCPI CPI TCPI vs CPI

TCPI CPI Threshold

1.1 1.2 1.3

x

TCPI = 0.937 @ 0.30

TCPI > 1.10 @ 0.72 0.8 0.9 1.0 In d e x

ΔEV% = 0 42 0.7

0.8

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Fraction Complete

ΔEV% = 0.42

(24)

Application to Project

Recovery

| For a project of reasonable size, having more than 40 percent of the period of performance to create and make an effective change the PM create and make an effective change, the PM has a very good chance for being successful with the recovery action

(25)

Evaluating the Recovery

Strategy

| The TCPI has application, as well, in creating a viable recovery strategy …a trade-off between cost and schedule performance to achieve the cost and schedule performance to achieve the commitments to the customer (TAB &

negotiated product delivery date)

| To resolve the condition of unsatisfactory cost performance, the PM creates a plan for

transforming the cost performance from the g p present value of CPIa (actual value) to an improved efficiency, CPIs (strategy value)

(26)

Evaluating the Recovery

Strategy

| TCPI plays a role in evaluating whether the change desired can realistically be achieved. For this purpose, the following formula for TCPI is used:

TCPI = (1 – EV%) / (CPIs-1 – CPIa-1 ∗ EV%)

| As a rule of thumb the envisioned performance | As a rule of thumb, the envisioned performance

change has a good likelihood of being

achievable when the calculated value for TCPI is less than or equal to 1 00 indicating

is less than or equal to 1.00 …indicating

whether there is sufficient opportunity for the improvement to succeed

(27)

Schedule Analysis

Schedule Analysis

| The To Complete Schedule Performance Index (TSPI) facilitates analysis similar to the TCPI

| TSPI is equal to the planned duration for the | TSPI is equal to the planned duration for the

work remaining divided by the duration available:

TSPI = (PD – ES) / (TD – AT) TSPI = (PD – ES) / (TD – AT)

where PD is the planned duration ES is the Earned Schedule TD is the total duration desired TD is the total duration desired

…generally: PD, the negotiated duration (ND), or estimated duration (ED)

AT is the actual time or duration at the time of AT is the actual time or duration at the time of

(28)

Schedule Analysis

Schedule Analysis

| The use of TSPI is available for schedule

management and control in a parallel manner to cost and TCPI

| Is the project schedule recoverable?

| What is the period of opportunity for the PM to

make a positive schedule performance change? make a positive schedule performance change?

| Is the period of opportunity sufficient for

schedule recovery to be successful?

| Both TCPI & TSPI are needed to have complete capability for the cost–schedule performance trade-off necessary for project

(29)

Summary

Summary

| TCPI is definitely more than the simple

calculation for determining the performance rate needed for the remaining work

needed for the remaining work

| TCPI has application in evaluating the realism of the bottom up derived EAC …it was shown that the value of 1.10 is a reasonable criterion for determining when a project is not

(30)

Summary

Summary

| Use of TCPI was extended to the evaluation of the opportunity and the performance

transformation envisioned for project recovery

z TCPI may also be used in creating the tactical

changes of personnel and overtime adjustments

| Through Earned Schedule the methods g described for TCPI are made applicable to schedule analysis, as well

| TCPI & TSPI have much to offer to the PM in | TCPI & TSPI have much to offer to the PM in

his/her efforts for controlling and managing the project

(31)

References

References

™ “The To Complete Performance Index …an expanded view,”

The Measurable News, 2009 Issue 2: 18-22 [W. Lipke]

™ “Project Recovery …It Can Be Done,” CrossTalk, January 2002: 26 29 [W Lipke]

2002: 26-29 [W. Lipke]

™ Practice Standard for Earned Value Management. Newtown

Square, PA: Project Management Institute 2005.

™ Earned Schedule website: www earnedschedule com ™ Earned Schedule website: www.earnedschedule.com

References

Related documents

Unlike Silicon Valley and most other innovative cities and regions in advanced economies, Shenzhen’s rise to an innovation centre has been driven by Hong Kong serves as a

Individual Mn impurities deposited on Ge 共100兲, Ge共111兲, and GaAs共110兲 substrates present magnetic mo- ments significantly larger compared to the average Mn magnetization

The purpose of this research paper is to provide an analysis of Trio for Clarinet, Viola, and Piano by the important twentieth-century American composer, Eric Ewazen.. This paper will

In this study, the effect of the anchor head on the pullout behaviour of the sand coated glass-fibre- reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars embedded in the geopolymer

Theor ies can prov ide usefu l frameworks for exp lor ing and fur ther unders tand ing these inf luences in var ious popu la t ions, thus enab l ing the des ign of more

Based on previous literature demonstrating the ergogenic potential of other fruit-derived polyphenols, and in particular the anthocyanin subclass, we propose that the high

The five- step analysis requires the trier of fact to consider an individual’s current work activity; the severity of the impairment(s) both in duration and whether it meets or

I determine that as the liberal fallacies of progressive action for black rights take shape, Douglass’ interpretive agency is combined with Sontag’s pleasure and