Helping those bereaved by suicide:
what we have learnt at Support After
Suicide
Martin Ryan, Louise Flynn, Anne Giljohann, Sehar Warren, Colin Charles, Jackie Ballantyne
Counsellors
Support After Suicide, Melbourne, Australia Email: [email protected]
Paper presented at 3rd Australian Postvention
Helping those bereaved by suicide: what we have learnt at Support After Suicide
Outline of presentation:
1) Suicide statistics in Australia and Victoria 2) Support After Suicide program
3) Suicide bereavement’s particular features 4) Applicable theoretical approaches
5) Key learnings from Support After Suicide 6) Conclusion
Suicide in Australia
2010 Australian Statistics
2,361 deaths registered as suicide (1.6% of all deaths)
1,816 men (77%)
545 women (23%)
highest rate males aged 40-44(27.7 per 100,000), followed
closely by males aged 35-39 (27.5 per 100,000)
This represents many children losing a father to suicide
for males aged 15-19 = lowest rate (11.4 per 100,000 ),
but 23% of male deaths in this age group
Males nearly 4 times that of females
Most frequent method was hanging (56%)
(most frequent method for both men & women)
In 2004 Support After Suicide was funded as the sole specialist suicide bereavement counselling
service in the Australian state of Victoria.
Population of Victoria (2010) = 5,679,337
Number of suicides in Victoria in 2010 was 531.
405 men (76%) and 126 women (24%)
(Causes of Death, Australia 2010. ABS, released March 2012)
Helping those bereaved by suicide: what we have learnt at Support After Suicide
Support After Suicide program
A program of Jesuit Social Services
(non-government welfare agency adhering to the traditions of St Ignatius Loyola, founder of Jesuits)
Main work is with disadvantaged young
people, particularly those involved in the
criminal justice system
Support After Suicide program
Funded by the Australian Commonwealth
government as part of its National Suicide
Prevention Strategy.
Enacting Shneidman’s (1972) dictum that
postvention is prevention for the next
Support After Suicide program
The goal of the program is to increase the
availability of
timely
andappropriate
support toindividuals & families
(especially those with young children) who are bereaved by suicide
Support After Suicide program
Employs 3.8 EFTSU (6 counsellors /community
educators) + .5 admin person
Central location plus access to 4 other sites
around Melbourne including a CBD office.
Staff have variety of backgrounds including
psychology, social work, counselling and
psychotherapy, plus bereavement counselling experience. All work part-time, with
Support After Suicide program
Direct service
: MelbourneCounselling
Individuals/Families/Couples
Based in inner city Richmond, outreach in Dandenong, Lalor, Ferntree Gully and CBD Support groups
Early bereavement closed group Monthly “drop in” group
Forums for siblings/ partners
Writing/performance group – “ Nothing
prepared me for this” project
Volunteer program – engaged in range
of activities from fundraising through to peer support (bereaved to bereaved) and co-facilitating support groups
Support After Suicide program
Capacity building:
statewide Education and Training
Secondary Consultation to Professionals
Health, education, welfare, community sectors Resources
Information sheets
Website: for bereaved people and professionals
Online community
Support After Suicide program
The program believes that people need
access to highly skilled clinical support to
be provided immediately post-suicide
Support should continue long term due to
the enormous impact and disruption as a
consequence of suicide
Support After Suicide program
Service is free of charge
No maximum limit on client sessions
(mean number of sessions = 24)
We try to see people as soon as possible
Suicide bereavement’s unique and
complex features
(Flynn, 2009)involves trauma (sensory or informational)
impact of suicide on identity and sense of self experience of failure
impact of stigma
search for an explanation
young people and developmental issues
impact on social network and family relationships increased risk of suicide
Support After Suicide program
Applicable theoretical approaches:
Dual Process Model (Stroebe & Schut, 2008)
Disenfranchised grief (Doka, 2002)
Grieving styles (Doka & Martin, 2010)
Continuing Bonds (Klass, Silverman & Nickman, 1996)
Narrative approach (Neimeyer, 2001; White, 2007)
A broadly psychodynamic approach
Key learnings
1) the need to work with the grief, the trauma and that the death was self-inflicted;
2) persisting with people for the long haul (expert companioning, Jordan, 2009);
3) the need to be flexible and creative, particularly with young people;
4) the power of group work;
5) the need for factual information about suicide and processes surrounding it for clients; and
6) to be open to clients’ extraordinary
experiences and the use of psychics and mediums.
1) Need to work with the grief, the trauma and that the death was self-inflicted
All three important and at some point may need to
engage with each of these
?when/how
Dosing important (self) for both traumatic
images/memories and for grief (DPM) (Jordan, 2010)
Follow clients lead on this, plus some control needs
to be exercised by counsellor
Counsellors need skills and knowledge
to work with each of these three elements
2) Persisting with people for the long haul
(expert companioning, Jordan, 2009)
Mean no. of counselling sessions is 24 (even at 1
a week = half a year)
“Sticking with it” through ups and downs (with
the latter predominating)
“Groundhog Day” at times, but look and listen
for small changes in story
Looking for signs of improvement in progress Not just companioning, it is expert
and all that this entails (with belief, optimism and caring)
3) Need to be flexible and creative,
particularly with young people
Not necessarily traditional counselling or therapy Not necessarily office-based
Activity-based e.g. camps, circus arts, swimming,
playing football or cricket
Discussion of tattoos
Casework – not just for emotional engagement,
but practical assistance
Running with hunches and intuition
4) Power of group work
Can have a significant impact for people
Group participants can be very helpful to each
other
Support and information from others who have
been through the same experience, often more important than what counsellor can do
People feel isolated, alone, ‘outsider’, freakish.
Group restores connection to society, restores a sense of belonging.
5) Need for factual information about suicide and processes surrounding it for clients
Not mentioned in the literature but we have
found it to be very important
Counsellors need to be prepared and able to do
this
Information regarding suicide, especially
hanging (predominant method in Australia)
(Sauvagneau’s work e.g. 2007 & 2010 useful here)
Coronial processes
Assisting client to understand the
autopsy/toxicology and coronial reports
6) Open to clients’ extraordinary experiences and the use of psychics and mediums
People will tell the counsellor about these
experiences if they trust them
Can be comforting and helpful to them May be disturbing
Key question to ask: how did you feel? What do you
think it means?
Going to psychics/mediums is not uncommon Can be comforting, and/or provide
answers, but not always (LaGrand, 1999 and 2006; Sanger, 2009)
Conclusion
In working with those bereaved by suicide, one size does not
fit all
A variety of types of responses and supports, needed from
individual work, family work, group work, activity-based work to online responses
that provide a range of supports (counselling, therapy,
practical information and assistance) for the long haul involved in having someone close to you suicide
Working well involves: 1) clinical training; 2) working
effectively; and 3) working compassionately
An earlier version of this paper was
presented at the 9th International
Conference on Grief and Bereavement in
Contemporary Society & ADEC 33rd
Annual Conference, Miami, Florida, June
22 – 25, 2011 and also a version of this
paper is in press and will be published as
an article in the journal
Grief Matters
later
in 2012
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge the contribution of
my counsellor colleagues at Support After
Suicide to the development of the ideas in this
paper, particularly Louise Flynn as Coordinator
of the program, and my current colleagues
Anne Giljohann, Sehar Warren, Colin Charles
and Jackie Ballantyne, as well as former
colleagues Barbara Friday, Brendan
Fitzgerald and Felicity Elkiana
References
Chandler, R. (2005). ‘Psychodynamic therapeutic approaches with people who are grieving.’ Grief Matters, 8(2), 30-34.
Doka, K. (2002). Disenfranchised Grief: New directions, challenges and
strategies for practice, Champaign IL: Research Press.
Doka, K. & Martin, T. (2010). Grieving Beyond Gender: Understanding
the Ways Men and Women Mourn. (Revised edition), New York NY:
Routledge.
Flynn, L. (2009). ‘Is suicide bereavement different? The experience of Support After Suicide.’ Grief Matters,12(1), 18-21.
Jordan, J. (2009). ‘After suicide: clinical work with survivors’ Grief
Matters, 12(1), 4-9.
Jordan, J. (2010) ‘Principles of Grief Counselling with Adult Survivors’ in Jordan, J. & McIntosh, J. (eds.) (2010) Grief After Suicide: Understanding
the Consequences and Caring for the Survivors, New York NY: Routledge,
179-223.
Klass, D., Silverman, P., & Nickman, S. (Eds.). (1996).
Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief.
References
LaGrand, L. (1999). Messages and miracles: Extraordinary experiences
of the bereaved, St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Worldwide.
LaGrand, L. (2006). Love lives on: learning from the extraordinary
encounters of the bereaved, New York NY: Berkeley Books.
Neimeyer, R. (2001). Meaning Reconstruction and Experience of Loss,
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ryan, M., Merighi, J., Healy, B. & Renouf, N. (2004) ‘Belief, Optimism and Caring: Findings from a cross-national study of expertise in mental health social work.’ Qualitative Social Work, 3 (4), 411-29.
M. Ryan, C. Dowden, B. Healy & N. Renouf. (2005) ‘Watching the Experts: findings from an observational study of expert Australian mental health social worker. ‘ Journal of Social Work, 5(3), 279-298.
Sanger, M. (2009). ‘When clients sense the presence of loved ones who have died.’ Omega, 59 (1), 69-89.
References
Sauvagneau, A. & Racette, S. (2007). ‘Agonal sequences in a film suicidal hanging: analysis of respiratory and movement responses to asphyxia by hanging.’ Journal of Forensic Science, 52, 957-59.
Sauvagneau, A., LaHarpe, R., King, D., Dowling, G., Andrews, S., Kelly, S., Ambrosi, C., Guay, J., and Geberth, V., for the Working Group on Human Asphyxia (2010). ‘Agonal sequences in 14 film hangings with comments on the role of the type of suspension, ischaemic habituation and ethanol
intoxication on the timing of agonal responses’. American Journal of
Forensic Medicine And Pathology, (undergoing post author corrections,
29th of July 2010.)
Shneidman, E. (1972). Foreword. In Cain, A. (Ed.) Survivors of Suicide,
Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas, ix-xi.
Stroebe, M. & Schut, H. (2008). ‘The dual process model of coping with bereavement: overview and update.’
Grief Matters, 11(1), 4-10.
White, M. (2007). Maps of Narrative Practice, New York, NY: W.W. Norton.