• No results found

NACIO Webinar September 2014

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "NACIO Webinar September 2014"

Copied!
31
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NACIO

 

Webinar

September

 

2014

TCU Public Communicator Program

Dr. Jacqueline Lambiase, Co‐Director

Jessica Beyer, NACIO First VP, Blue Earth County, Minn.

Social Media & Public Records: What You Need to Know

Anil Chawla Founder & CEO

(2)

Social Media & Public Records:

What You Need to Know

Presented by

Anil Chawla

(3)

Slide 3

My goals for this webinar

Share real‐life examples and case studies Discuss your options for record keeping Demonstrate an automated archive – live!

Answer your questions

1

2

3

4

(4)

The Public Records Issue

(5)

"Writings" means and includes all books, papers, maps, 

photographs, cards, tapes, recordings, or other 

documentary materials, regardless of physical form or 

characteristics. "Writings" includes digitally stored data, 

including without limitation electronic mail messages, but 

does not include computer software. 

"Writings" means and includes all books, papers, maps, 

photographs, cards, tapes, recordings, or other 

documentary materials, regardless of physical form or 

characteristics. "Writings" includes digitally stored data, 

including without limitation electronic mail messages, but 

does not include computer software. 

Slide 5

Colorado Open Records Act

(6)

The general forms in which the media containing public 

information exist include a book, paper, letter, document, 

e‐mail, Internet posting, text message, instant message, 

other electronic communication, printout, photograph, 

film, tape, microfiche, microfilm, photostat, sound 

recording, map, and drawing and a voice, data, or video 

representation held in computer memory.

The general forms in which the media containing public 

information exist include a book, paper, letter, document, 

e‐mail, Internet posting, text message, instant message, 

other electronic communication, printout, photograph, 

film, tape, microfiche, microfilm, photostat, sound 

recording, map, and drawing and a voice, data, or video 

representation held in computer memory.

Slide 6

Texas Public Information Act

Section 552.002(c)

(7)

Slide 7

But are you receiving

requests for social media?

“Any and all documents that relate to…”

“All reports of the incident…”

“All notifications of the street closure…”

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

Slide 11

(12)
(13)
(14)

Case study: Why metadata matters

O'Neill v. City of Shoreline Case No. 82397-9

• Lawsuit requesting metadata about who sent an email

• Settled in 2013 after 7 years • City paid $538,555

As a result of this case, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that 

(15)

Example: Metadata in a tweet

126 characters = 2,308 characters of

metadata

Important details such as user IDs &

timestamps

(16)

Case study: A social media lawsuit

Hawaii Defense Foundation, et al. v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.

Case No. 1:12-cv-00469

• Lawsuit filed because of deleted Facebook postings

• Plaintiff claimed 1st amendment rights were violated

• City settled by agreeing to pay $31K in attorneys fees

Beyond public information requests, social media records can also serve as key legal evidence.

(17)

Slide 17

Why isn’t this IT’s problem?

The

 

data

 

exists

 

outside

 

IT’s

 

control

Access

 

to

 

social

 

media

 

is

 

not

 

centralized

Are

 

you

 

responsible

 

for

 

public

 

information

?

(18)

Record Keeping Options

(19)

Slide 19

But first…what not to do!

DO NOT…

believe that “one

way”

social media exists. You can’t:

• Turn off Facebook comments • Prevent Twitter mentions

• Disable all private messaging

DO NOT…

rely on each social

network to keep your data

(20)

Partial Solution #1: Manual archiving

Manually copy & paste, or take screen

shots, from each social networking site.

(21)

Manual archiving: pros / cons

PROS

“Free”

No

 

IT

 

deployment

CONS

Not

 

actually

 

free

Difficult

 

to

 

organize

 

&

 

manage

Poor

 

records;

 

easily

 

(22)

Partial Solution #2: Personal backup tools

Periodically capture a basic copy of your

social media data from each social

(23)

Personal backup tools: pros / cons

CONS

Very

 

basic

 

capture

Very

 

little

 

context;

 

hard

 

to

 

make

 

make

 

sense

 

of

 

the

 

data

Not

 

designed

 

for

 

record

 

keeping;

 

limited

 

search

 

functionality

PROS

Automated

Captures

 

raw

 

data

(24)

Partial Solution #3: “All in one” archiving

Deliver records to a multi-purpose

archive, usually converting content to

email.

(25)

“All in one” archiving: pros / cons

CONS

Data

 

loss

 

due

 

to

 

data

 

conversion;

 

loses

 

metadata

Cumbersome

 

to

 

search

 

&

 

re

construct

 

conversations

PROS

Automated

Convenience

 

of

 

one

 

solution,

 

if

 

also

 

combing

 

your

 

email

 

in

 

(26)

The 4 most important factors

Frequency: How quickly can you capture new content 

before it is lost or deleted?

Comprehensiveness: Do you have all of the records you 

need? Are the records complete? What about metadata?

Authenticity: How is the data stored? Can you prove that it 

is an accurate record? Will it hold up in court?

Context: How easily can you locate the relevant records? 

(27)

Slide 27

Social media archiving “done right”

Easily capture, manage, and produce

records in an authentic, legally-sound

fashion.

(28)
(29)

Slide 29

Open Government in Practice

World’s first city to a launch an Open

Archive of Social Media for citizens to

search & access public records.

Austin's Open Archive of Social Media

Snohomish County’s Archive

First county in

Washington to launch an open archive.

NC’s Social Media Archive

First government in the world to launch an open archive.

(30)

Slide 30

About ArchiveSocial

Headquarters: Durham, North Carolina

Customers include: City & County of San Francisco (CA), Travis County (TX), Palm Beach County (FL), Wake County (NC), Washington County (OR),

Spokane County (WA), State of North Carolina, US National Archives

(31)

Social Media Archiving for Government

http://archivesocial.com

(919) 434-3509

[email protected]

@ArchiveSocial

References

Related documents

Rio Arriba County: 3,645 Roosevelt County: 2,004 Sandoval County: 12,094 San Juan County: 15,378 San Miguel County: 1,366 Santa Fe County: 10,445 Sierra County: 776 Socorro

Orange County Orocovis County Osceola County nor County cut Out Of Area of Palm Beach County Pasco County Patillas County Peñuelas County Pinellas County Polk County Ponce

Council Tenants, Departments within City & County of Swansea, Sections City & County of Swansea, Sections City & County of Swansea, Sections City & County of

§70-604.03, to include ballots for a limited number of retail customers in Cass County, Dakota County, Dawes County, Deuel County, Garden County, Johnson County, Keith County,

Wabash County Warren County Washington County Wayne County White County Whiteside County Will County Williamson County Winnebago County Woodford County.. Commissioner Tony

Yolo County was the second county in California to implement a Neighborhood Court program based on restorative justice principles, with San Francisco County

Funds are appropriated for economic development projects, including infrastructure development, job training programs, as well as to attract technology and biotechnology

The School District of Palm Beach County, with 21,495 employees, is the largest employer in the county followed by Palm Beach County and other various government agencies