• No results found

[NORMAL] GOALS. Server Management Program Review / Training. To Review SMP structure, requirements, logistics. To increase quality and benefit of documentation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "GOALS. Server Management Program Review / Training. To Review SMP structure, requirements, logistics. To increase quality and benefit of documentation"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Server Management

Program Review / Training

 To Review SMP structure, requirements, logistics  To increase quality and benefit of documentation  Provide/review examples and upgraded templates

 Unit IT Managers are accountable for comprehensive application of SMP

within the unit

(2)

SMP: Document Repository

& Update Cycles

 SMP Portal is where all required documents are to be

stored

https://agrilife-smp.tamu.edu

 Updates for annual documents are due by Oct 31

st

 Monthly, Quarterly documents are due at end of each cycle

 Will be assumed content is always here and up to date

(3)

SMP: Document Naming

Conventions

 Templates provided in Template Zip – Do not change names

Examples:

AccountManagementLog.docx

DisasterRecoveryPlan.docx

 Use Portal Checkout and Check-in Functionality (

Demo)

 Up to 4 years of past documentation will be maintained for state

(4)

SMP: Documentation

Grouping

 Many units manage groups of servers with the same process

and tools.

 For systems that are managed this way one document (e.g.

Disaster Recovery) can be created to cover all servers with the

same procedures

 Document should clearly list the DNS name for all the individual

(5)

SMP: Procedures & Logs

 SMP consists of both Procedure documents and Logs

 Procedures should be written with enough detail to accommodate someone else performing the process (see examples)

 Logs should at a minimum identify who, when, what was performed and the associated server(s)

 Procedures require scheduled annual reviews to maintain familiarity and verify process viability with noted changes formally documented immediately

(6)

SMP: What Requires

Documentation?

 The system will be SERVING a function to PUBLIC

(i.e. web server, file server, video server, workstation with LAMP etc.)

 It is running a known server operating system

(

may require review of build/version edition information to determine

)

 System is SERVING a function to INTERNAL user base

(i.e. web server, file server, video server, etc.)

 Not a server but may still need account and patch

(7)

SMP: SERVER/DOCUMENT

INDEX

 Each Unit should maintain updated Server/Document Index

SERVER-INDEX.xlsx (see required template)

 Template facilitates SMP, MRT, ISAAC and System Audit Needs  List Servers, Classify Server, fill in remaining detail

(8)

SMP: Backup Procedure

Documentation

 Goal : Protect specified data in a scheduled manner enabling quick and

efficient restoration

 Procedures should identify all backup solutions, the associated

hardware/software, data that is backed up, specific steps to setup the backup process and to recover the data

 Backups should be tested monthly and the recovery process tested annually

with testing dates and results noted in log (DisasterRecoveryBackuplog.docx)

 Documented process of backup, recovery and testing procedures required

(9)

SMP: Disaster Recovery

Documentation

 Goal : Minimize negative operational impacts by identifying critical systems,

prioritize their recovery, define steps to reconfigure and recover these systems to normal operation

 Procedures should include procuring replacement parts, access to

necessary media and backups, steps for restoring/restarting systems and checking system/application functions

 Procedures should be tested annually with testing dates and results noted in

log (DisasterRecoveryBackuplog.docx)

 Documented process of recovery and testing

(10)

SMP: Account Management

Documentation

 Only required for non-AGNET Servers

 Must have documented Account Management Procedure including

steps for account creation, change and removal (Example)

 Account Management template specifies minimum tracking

information (AccountManagementLog.docx) necessary to log both creation

and removal of accounts

 Reviews should occur to identify inactive (90 days) or former

employee accounts potentially missed during off boarding

 Reviews are to be logged with changes noted per

(11)

SMP: Security Monitoring

 Goal : Review logs, etc. to identify unusual events that may indicate malicious

activity

 Procedure should include steps for reviewing

 Failed login attempts

 Login attempts from foreign countries for legitimate accounts associated with

faculty/staff not traveling overseas

 High resource consumption of disk space or high system processor utilization  Large number of failed job executions

 Reviews should occur weekly for mission critical systems, monthly for non-mission critical systems with each review and its results logged(SecurityMonitorLog.docx)

(12)

SMP: Physical Security

 Goal : Monitor physical access to servers and network equipment

 Procedure should include steps for obtaining access to server room and whether escorted access is required

 If not using a key card swipe system must have a log sheet in room (PhysicalSecurityAccessLog.docx)

 List of those provided room access via cards/keys must be reviewed and renewal required at least once a year

 Documented process for obtaining access required

(13)

SMP: Change Management

 Goal : Establish standardized, efficient methods for managing change

 Procedure should establish regimented steps for change requests spanning from the initial inquiry to

notification of completion

 Changes must be logged (ChangeManagementLog.docx) when any of the following occurs on a server:

Configuration change in hardware or software

Relocation of a server

Network configuration change

Software installation, removal or reaffirmation (reaffirm need for software annually)

Patch/updates applied to server

(14)

SMP: Confidential

Information

 Identity Finder now available at no cost from sell.tamu.edu  Scan should be performed annually at a minimum

 Each scan should be logged with findings and remediation steps noted (ConfidentialInfoScanLog.docx)

 Any violations must be logged and reported to AIT ISO immediately

 Servers persisting confidential information must be authorized by the ISO and

TAMU System ISO, per System policy, prior to the storage commencing

Identity Finder Installation available via AGNET domain on a scheduled basis

(15)

SMP: ISAAC Risk

Assessment Process

 ISAAC REPORTS should cover ALL SERVERS and ALL WORKSTATIONS within your unit, no matter where they are located, funding source or owner.

 Unit IT Manager is accountable for comprehensive ISAAC assessment for

unit.

 All units will be required to send completed reports to AIT for QA review 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO UNIVERSITY DEADLINE

 Any remediation resulting from ISAAC will be coordinated through the AgriLife ISO

 Starts September 1 and ends November 22

(16)

SMP: Patch Management

 Business owner or administrator, representing each server, must attend the monthly Information Systems Security meeting

 Critical patches/updates must be applied as identified

 Operating system and application software patches/updates must be applied and confirmed on a monthly basis

 Patch/update installation must be logged in the Change Management log (ChangeManagementLog.docx) for servers not using AGNET WSUS or Red Hat subscription services

(17)

SMP: Vulnerability Scanning

and Remediation

 Goal : Perform scan on all systems to detect and remediate vulnerabilities

 Systems monitored by AIT Nessus scanner are provided with monthly report via email

 Campus systems not reachable by AIT Nessus scanner can either utilize the CIS Nessus

scanner or if no active scanning being performed a documented Risk Assessment Review report must be created

 Vulnerabilities should be reviewed, remediation scheduled and results logged

(VulnerabilityScanLog.docx)

Generally less than 30 days

For more high/critical ASAP timeframe

 Accountabilities of Unit IT Manager

Facilitator for entire unit even if not managing a server

Must assist or source solutions to resolve vulnerabilities of all unit servers

Alternatively, recommend to unit head alternative solution/resource

(18)

Workstation Management:

WSUS

 Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) available to all

departments and centers with update policy selected by adding

computer to a group

 Three policy setting options available via groups

 Default: automatic patch download, install and reboot

 WSUS-NoReboot: automatic patch download, install with manual reboot  WSUS-Servers: automatic patch download, manual install and reboot

Note: Do not rename, delete or remove any of the groups

(19)

Workstation Management:

WSUS

 Default for all policies

 Computer checks for updates 3 am nightly

 If computer is not powered on at 3 am service will attempt updates 2-3 hours after the system is powered on

- Under these circumstances options 1 & 2 automatically install updates after download and then prompt for reboot on hourly basis. User has option to defer reboot.

 Automated Report

 Emailed third Tuesday of each month

 Provides patch status for computers that have ‘checked in’ within the last 30 days and that have outstanding patches

(20)

Workstation Management:

WSUS

 Report entries include computer name, …..

 Security bulletin (SB) is a notice, sent upon release, detailing the release date, issue(s) addressed, actions to take, software impacted, etc.

(Example: MS13-047 – 13 indicates release in 2013, 47 indicates sequence number of patch)

 Knowledge Base (KB) is same content as security bulletin but filed in MS system for reference and may have additions over time to reflect new data, etc.

(Either SB or KB may be ‘Googled’ to view the specific details)

 Severity rating indicates the impact of vulnerabilities addressed by patch  Statusindicates progress of patch install for system

(21)

Workstation Management:

WSUS

 Severity Ratings

 Critical – Vulnerability whose exploitation could allow code execution without user interaction. (apply immediately)

 Important – Vulnerability that could result in compromise of confidentiality, integrity or availability of user data or processing resource. (apply asap)

 Moderate – Vulnerability whose impact is mitigated significantly by factors such as authentication requirements, etc. (apply time dependent on factors impacted)

 Low – Vulnerability’s impact mitigated by characteristics of affected component  Unspecified – Vulnerability does not have a severity rating

(22)

Workstation Management:

WSUS

 Status

 Not Installed – An attempt to install the patch has not been made at time of report generation.

 Downloaded – Update downloaded and is sitting on system waiting to be installed  Installed Pending Reboot – Update downloaded, installed and requires reboot to

complete the installation

 Failed – Update downloaded and an attempt made to install but install failed

(23)

Workstation Management

Local Account Report

• Monthly Automated Delivery for AGNET Domain Systems

• IT Managers should review

• Remediate any extraneous, guest or unused accounts

References

Related documents

Keywords: Online labs · Inquiry learning · Tutoring · STEM · Social tutoring platform · Teacher professional development · Community building · Business model..

MPAC 1: Reasoning with definitions and theorems MPAC 2: Connecting concepts MPAC 3: Implementing algebraic/computational processes MPAC 4: Connecting multiple representations

(as of 1/27/21) External Review Hillard Heintze Total: 32 Use of Force Bias Community Policing Accountability Recruitment Hiring & Retention 5 14 6 6 0.. Safety

The paper first explained the research background and significance, summarized the related research at home and abroad, put forward the research target, contents, idea and

If the engine to which you are connecting the EMS100 has a boost pressure sender, you must select the correct type of boost pressure sender for this setting in order for the data

Ù˘ National Geographic Society ÁÈ· Ù· μȂϛ· Î·È Ù· ¶ÂÚÈÔ‰Èο National Geographic Magazine Î·È NG KIDS. ∫Ô‡ÛÎÔ˘ÚË, geographic knowledge»

This clearly reveals that the growth in the dematerialization process was not keeping pace with the growth in the total turn over of shares in the Indian capital