• No results found

The Analysis of Knowledge, Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Cycles: A Broad Review

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Analysis of Knowledge, Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Cycles: A Broad Review"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

152 www.hrmars.com

The Analysis of Knowledge, Knowledge Management

and Knowledge Management Cycles: A Broad Review

Jawad Kayani

Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan Email: jwdkayani@gmail.com

M. Qamar Zia

Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan Email: Mqamarzia@yahoo.com

Abstract

Knowledge is a vital asset for any organization. There are two types of knowledge, tacit and explicit knowledge. Knowledge management has become a serious topic in the last decade. Knowledge management turned into an essential part of the organization due to high importance. The common stages of the knowledge management process are storing, gathering, structuring, sharing, controlling, generating, distributing, codifying, using and exploiting. The main purpose of this study is to examine the knowledge, knowledge management and knowledge management cycles and how they are playing vital role in managing the knowledge. Knowledge is prestigious entity and organizations cannot survive without knowledge because it's offering lots of benefits in the professional world.

Keywords:Knowledge, Knowledge Management, KM Cycles Introduction

Knowledge

Knowledge is a conceptual viewpoint, and accurate estimation with an account (Plato, 347BC). ‘‘A dynamic human process of justifying personal belief toward the truth called knowledge’’ (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995). ‘‘ A fluid mix of framed experiences, values, contextual information and expert insight called Knowledge” (Prusak, 1998). ‘‘A capacity that builds on information extracted from data or the set of expectations that an observer hold with respect to an event called Knowledge ’’ (Boisot, 1998). Knowledge is a vital asset (Chase, 2000). There are three forms of knowledge, first form refers knowledge is prearranged in entities and tangible structures. Second form refers knowledge refers to ideas and concepts. Third form refers distribution of linguistic formulations, theories, and models (popper, 2000). Head of countries and executives need the tacit knowledge (Goldberg, 2005). Research based knowledge is unsuccessful in guiding policy and practice (Department of Trade and Industry, 2001). The interaction of vital people and their departments can play a key part in knowledge creation/construction in the organization (Nonaka, 1996). Explicit knowledge encloses the

(2)

153 www.hrmars.com

words/terminologies, diagrams like tables & graphs, or photographs/snaps (Collins, 2001). Explicit knowledge is scientific or intellectual facts or information that is expressed in proper language, like instruction manuals, arithmetical/statistical expressions/terminologies, copyright and patents (Smith, 2001). Tacit knowledge is an individual type of knowledge, which acquire from through experience (Augier, Shari and Vendelo, 2001). Tacit knowledge can be competitive edge because it's tougher to specify, duplicate, and share (Meyer, 1997). There are two categories of knowledge: tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995). Knowledge develops the mentality of freedom (Hegel, 1831). Knowledge is a key source for s maintainable competitive edge (Grant, 1996b; Nonaka et al., 2001). Practical/useful Information which based on experience called knowledge (Leonard-Barton, 1995; Leonard and Sensiper, 1998). Organizational knowledge produced from associated people of the organization (Zarraga and Saa, 2006). Knowledge turn into crucial for organizations to carry on internal and external change in their surroundings (Davenport and Prusak, 1998; Jarrar, 2002) and to achieve the benefits (Lee, 2000). Knowledge is a real organizational resource (Drucker, 2002). Knowledge increment leads to production opportunities plus create the unique opportunities for every single firm (Penrose, 1959).

Knowledge Management

Decision makers must consider the knowledge management because it is important for organizational survival and competitiveness (Goodman and Chinowsky, 1997). Knowledge management looks are a big motivation for organization (Carrillo, 2000). Managing knowledge is an old issue (Roos et al., 1997). Knowledge management is the one of the modern areas of research in the last decade (Kalpic and Bernus, 2006). KM has extensive significance because its explain administrators/managers' concerns and builds attentiveness of knowledge as a cost-effective plus point (Spender, 2002). Knowledge management process consists of four processes including capturing, arranging, refining and shifting (Awad and Ghaziri, 2004). The stages of knowledge transfer are parallel to the stages of the knowledge management process: arranging, distribution, adapting, using, generating, defining, and gathering (O’dell, Grayson and Essaides, 2003). KM process contains phases: make/create, store/retrieve, shift and use (Alavi and Leidner, 2001). Km conceptualizes through ideas, assumptions, perceptions and models (Earl, 2001; Kakabadse et al., 2003). Companies in Japan achieved the success at the international level due to organizational knowledge creation ability (Gupta and Govindarajan, 2000). Organizations must place, make, distribute and apply organizational knowledge to maintain competitiveness (Zack, 1998). Knowledge cannot completely transfer during conversation (Polanyi, 1958).

Knowledge Management Cycles

Knowledge making/building is an unstoppable process which has several elements including the idea generation, grasping new models and mixing the theories/concepts for new processes (Jashapara, 2004). There are several KM cycles exists: Meyer and Zack (1996), Bukowitz and Williams (2000), McElroy (2003), and Wiig (1993).

(3)

154 www.hrmars.com Meyer and Zack KM Cycle (1996)

This cycle has been derived from the design and development of information products. Meyer and Zack (1996) tied the vital stages of knowledge repository with own KM Cycle Stages. There are five stages of Meyer and Zack KM Cycle.

Figure. 1 Acquire

Get the raw data from various sources. Keep the following things in mind when trying to obtain the data: intensity, precision, scope, cost, significance, management and suitability.

Acquire Refine Distribute Store Present All Stages Repository of Research Results Reports Newsletters Bulletins Users Sources

(4)

155 www.hrmars.com

Refinement

Refinement means insert value, reorganization, relabeling and indexing both. Refinement can be physical or logical.

Storage/Retrieval

A vital stage of this KM cycle because it creates a connection between the first two stages. Storage of information can be physical (hard notes, files) or digital (soft files, database).

Distribution

Distribution means providing information to users through various mediums (emails, telephone, fax, letters).

Use

Use the obtained information in the daily operations of group and organization for better future output.

(5)

156 www.hrmars.com The Wiig KM Cycle (1993)

Figure. 2 Build

Acquire, analyze, recreate, synthesize, codify, model, organize the new or/and existing knowledge.

Hold

Remember, accumulate, implant, record in repositories of knowledge for future use.

Build

Hold

Pool

Use

Learn from personal experience Formal education and training

Intelligence sources Media, books, peers

In people

In tangible forms (e.g. books)

KM systems (intranet, database) Groups of people brainstorm

In work context Embedded in work processes All Stages

(6)

157 www.hrmars.com

Pool

Coordinate, accumulate, renovate, generate, access, retrieve the knowledge. Use

Complete tasks, survey, describe, select, scrutinize, create, evaluate, decide, execute the knowledge.

The McElroy KM Cycle (2003)

Figure. 3 Knowledge Production

Solution of problem about existing knowledge tries to find out through the formulation, codification and evaluation.

Knowledge Integration

Solution of problem or/and new knowledge introduced in organizational settings through the following ways: transmit, search, educate, share.

Knowledge Production Business-Processing Environment Organizational Knowledge Knowledge Integration Distributed Organizational Knowledge Base

(7)

158 www.hrmars.com The Bukowitz and Williams Cycle (2000)

Figure. 4 Get

Obtain the information which is required for decisions and problem solving. Use

Apply the new obtained information in everyday work to improve the organizational operations and output.

Learn

The Process to gain knowledge from several experiences to construct the organizational competitive edge/value. Knowledge Contribute Learn Use Get Divest Build / Sustain Assess

(8)

159 www.hrmars.com

Contribute

Learned knowledge shared by employees/staff across the whole organization to improve the operations.

Assess

Assessment phase deals with individuals, groups and organization level. Assessment means the review of intellectual or corporeal assets (e.g. Information, knowledge) against the future needs of individuals, groups and organizations.

Build/Sustain

Build the new intellectual or corporeal assets if current intellectual assets will not fulfill the future needs and if current intellectual assets will fulfill the future needs then sustain them. Divest

Get rid of worthless intellectual or corporeal assets. JQ Incorporated KM Cycle Figure. 5 Discover/ Determine Obtain/Get Filter/Refine Share/Supply Utilize/Apply Storage/Stock Delete/Remove

(9)

160 www.hrmars.com

Discover/Determine

Find out the desired information from available sources and determine the target. Source of information can be primary or secondary.

Obtain/Get

When desired information discovered then get the target information from predetermined sources of information.

Filter/Refine

Analyze, reshape, reform and relabel the new obtained information. Share/Supply

Provide the filtered information to individual, groups and entire organization. Utilize/Apply

Implement the shared information in work activities in organizational settings to improve the operations and overall output.

Storage/Stock

Save the information in different mediums (databases, files, notes) for future needs. Delete/Remove

Divest the worthless/useless information from records, databases. Benefits and Detriments Of Knowledge Management

Benefits of Knowledge Management

 Enhances the effectiveness business processes.

 Brings consistency in all activities and operations.

 Improves the communication internally and externally.

 Can be a source of competitive advantage.

 Opens new markets.

 Provides the solution of the problem(s).

 Saves the cost and time.

(10)

161 www.hrmars.com Detriments of Knowledge Management

 Resistance to new KM systems and related technologies in organizational settings.

 Hard to keep up with pace of knowledge change.

 Inability to meet the expectations of the organization.

 Expensive KM systems and technologies are required to manage knowledge.

 Specialized training and education is needed to manage KM systems and technologies. Conclusion

Knowledge and management of knowledge became a vital concern for organizations in the last couple of years because it offers lot of vital benefits including competitive edge, improvement in the business processes, increase in the communication, saves money and time of organization which enhances the overall productivity. Today without knowledge management organization cannot survive in the market. The common stages of the knowledge management process are such as storing, gathering, structuring, sharing, controlling, generating, distributing, codifying, using and exploiting. The knowledge management cycle is a continuous process where information is identified, obtained, refined, shared, used, stored and divested. The above KM cycles highlight that how knowledge is managed in the organizational environment. KM offers several key benefits to organizations.

References

Dalkir, K (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. McGill University: Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann, 2 - 326.

Bukowitz, W., & Williams, R. (2000). The knowledge management Fieldbook. London: Prentice Hall.

Martensson, M. (2000). A Critical Review of Knowledge Management as a Management Tool, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 (3), 204 - 216.

McElroy, M. (1999). The knowledge life cycle. In Proceedings of the ICM Conference on KM. Miami, FL.

Campos, B. d. F. L. (2008). Analysis of The New Knowledge Management: Guidelines to Evaluate KM Frameworks, VINE, 38 (1), 30 - 41.

Kalpic, B., & Bernus, P. (2006). Business Process Modeling Through the Knowledge Management Perspective, Journal of Knowledge Management, 10 (3), 40 - 56.

Gera, R. (2012). Bridging the Gap in Knowledge Transfer Between Academia and Practitioners, International Journal of Educational Management, 26 (3), 252 - 273.

(11)

162 www.hrmars.com

Sagsan, M. (2006). A New Life Cycle Model for Processing of Knowledge Management. Proceedings of International Conference on Business, Management and Economics in İzmir, Turkey, 1 - 9.

Gooijer, d. J. (2000). Designing a Knowledge Management Performance Framework, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 (4), 303 - 310.

Moteleb, AA., & Mark Woodman, M. (2007). Notions of Knowledge Management Systems: a Gap Analysis, The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (1), 55 - 62.

Fard, D. H., & Selseleh, M. (2010). Measuring Knowledge Management Cycle: Evidence from Iran, European Journal of Scientific Research, 41 (2), 297 - 309.

Abzari, M., Shaemi, A., Talebi, H., Freyedon, A., & Abdolmanafi, S. (2010). A Study of Amount of Paying Attention to Knowledge Management and Providing Solutions (Case study: Automobile Industry of Iran), European Journal of Social Sciences, 15 (4), 599 - 610.

Pun, F. K., & Nathai-Balkissoon, M. (2011). Integrating knowledge management into organizational learning: A Review of Concepts and Models, The Learning Organization, 18 (3), 203 - 223.

Craig Standing, C., & Benson, S. (2000). Irradiating Intranet Knowledge: The Role of the Interface, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4 (3), 244 - 251.

Kim, K-S., & Silvana Trimi, S. (2007). IT for KM in the Management Consulting Industry, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (3), 145 - 155.

Gao, F., Li, M., & Clarke, S. (2008). Knowledge, management, and knowledge management in business operations, Journal of Knowledge Management, 12 (2), 3 - 17.

Meyer, M., & Zack, M. (1996). The design and implementation of information products. Sloan Management Review, 37 (3), 43-59.

Wiig, K. (1993). Knowledge management foundations. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.

McElroy, M. W. (2003). The new knowledge management: complexity, learning, and sustainable innovation. KMCI Press.

References

Related documents

In  order  to  increase  their  search  result  yield  while  the  app’s  popularity  grows,  Figure  1  also  searches  a  list  of approved  medical  websites  for

QSMS Model Customer Satisfaction Management Review Investigation & Follow-up Safety Promotion Risk Assessment Maintain and Operate aircraft Accountability &

49 We present a model estimating the pathogen incidence in a population, being given a 50 sampling effort and an epidemic growth rate.. We then derive an approximation of this 51

Additional file 1: Table S1. Bacteriophage genomes within two mock viral communities. Results of Pacific Biosciences circular consensus sequencing read recruitment to reference

Alternatively, an appro- priate amount of ligamentum flavum or a small amount of bone tissue can be removed along the medial margin of the articular process to expand the lateral

We have to do static as well as dynamic analysis of rollcage in order to get an actual idea of total deformation and stress which is generated in various cases like Front impact,

The tuberculate type was usually unerupted, positioned palatal to the maxillary central incisor and frequently delayed the eruption of the permanent maxillary central incisor and

Examine the role of the implementer in the irrigation scheme in order to discover a technical integration approach that addresses better decision making in the selection