Endogenous circulating DNA in systemic lupus
erythematosus. Occurrence as multimeric
complexes bound to histone.
P M Rumore, C R Steinman
J Clin Invest.
1990;
86(1)
:69-74.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114716
.
Little is known about endogenous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) plasma DNA even
though it is the presumed precursor of DNA-containing immune complexes, thought to play
a central role in lupus glomerulonephritis. DNA purified from SLE plasma formed discrete
bands, corresponding to sizes of about 150-200, 400, 600, and 800 bp, closely resembling
the characteristic 200 bp "ladder" found with oligonucleosomal (ON) DNA. By radiolabeling
DNA while in whole plasma, the very small amounts present could be further characterized.
All of 24 such specimens formed two or more discrete bands on 6% PAGE. Detergent
treatment of plasma resulted in a DNA migration pattern similar to that of purified DNA,
suggesting disruption of DNA-protein complexes. DNA purified from authentic ON and
detergent-treated ON behaved similarly. A significant portion of DNA, labeled in SLE
plasma could be specifically immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antihistone antibody as
was the case with ON. These immunoprecipitates, when redissolved, exhibited the
expected size distribution upon PAGE. It is concluded that DNA in SLE plasma occurs as a
series of multimeric complexes, at least a portion of which is noncovalently bound to
histone. These results are consistent with an ON-like structure for SLE plasma DNA as had
been suggested by theoretical considerations and may have important implications for its
immunologic behavior in SLE and perhaps other disorders.
Research Article
Endogenous Circulating
DNA in
Systemic
Lupus
Erythematosus
Occurrence
asMuftimeric Complexes Bound to Histone
Peter M. Rumore and Charles R. Steinman
The Department ofMedicine, Division ofRheumatology, TheState UniversityofNew York,
Health Science CenteratBrooklyn, Brooklyn,New York11203
Abstract
Little is known about endogenous systemic lupus erythema-tosus(SLE) plasma DNA even though it is the presumed pre-cursorof DNA-containing immunecomplexes, thought to play a central role in lupusglomerulonephritis.DNApurified from SLE plasma formed discrete bands,correspondingtosizes of about150-200, 400, 600, and 800 bp, closely resembling the characteristic 200 bp "ladder" found with oligonucleosomal
(ON)DNA.Byradiolabeling DNA while in whole plasma, the verysmall amounts present could be further characterized.All
of 24 such specimens formed two or more discrete bands on 6%
PAGE.Detergent treatment of plasma resulted in a DNA mi-gration pattern similar to that of purified DNA, suggesting disruption of DNA-protein complexes. DNA purified from
au-thentic ONand detergent-treated ON behaved similarly. A significant portion of DNA, labeled in SLE plasma could be
specifically immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antihistone antibodyas was the case with ON. Theseimmunoprecipitates,
when redissolved,exhibitedthe expected sizedistributionupon
PAGE. It is concluded thatDNA inSLEplasma occurs as a
seriesofmultimericcomplexes,at leastaportionof whichis noncovalently boundto histone. These results are consistent withanON-likestructurefor SLE plasma DNAashad been
suggested bytheoretical considerations and may have
impor-tant implications for its immunologic behavior in SLE and
perhapsotherdisorders.(J.Clin.Invest.1990.86:69-74.)Key words: nucleosome* immunecomplexes*autoimmunity-
glo-merulonephritis*apoptosis
Introduction
DNA-containing immune complexes are believedto have a
central causal role in lupus glomerulonephritis (1). The
proxi-matesourceof theDNA componentof thesecomplexes,
pre-sumedto be
plasma
DNA,has been difficulttostudy,inpartbecause of the low concentrationspresent in most SLE
speci-mens(2-4).
Previous studieshave shownSLEplasmaDNAtobeoflow
molecular weight, largely double-stranded, but with
single-Apreliminary report of this work has appeared in abstract form in 1988.(Clin.Res.36:537a.)
Addressreprint requeststo Dr.Steinman, Division of Rheumatol-ogy, TheState University of NewYork, Health Science Centerat
Brooklyn, Box 42, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn,NY11203.
Receivedfor publication15September1988 and in revisedform18
September1989.
stranded regions, and to contain nucleotide base sequences
most or allofwhich are presentin thehuman genome (3-6). Thepresent resultsindicate thatDNAin SLEplasma
ex-hibits structural characteristics similartothoseof
oligonucleo-somes as would be consistent with its having been derived fromthesemacromolecular complexes with retentionof some
oftheir structural features. Suchanoligonucleosomal
(ON)'-like structure might have important implications for its appar-ent role in SLE,
particularly
with regardtoits immunologic behavior andtoits cellularorigins.
Methods
Patients andplasma specimens. Patients with SLE were selected for havingpersistentlycirculatingimmunoprecipitabledsDNAassociated withactive systemic vasculitis and/or CNS involvement as described (7). All fulfilled American Rheumatism Associationdiagnostic criteria
for SLE (8). Plasmawashandledaspreviouslydescribed (7) and stored below -20'C. Storage of these EDTA-containingspecimenshadno
discernable effectonthe results obtained. Plasmaspecimenswere in-activatedat
560C
for 30 min anddialyzed overnightin 10 mM Tris-HC1, 1mMEDTA,pH 8.0 (TE).Omissionof heat inactivation didnotalter the results. Plasma DNAconcentrationswerebetween 20 and 300 ng/ml (9). None exhibitedincreasedanti-dsDNA(10),ashasgenerally
been foundtobe thecasein suchpatients (7).
DNAandoligonucleosomes. Plasma DNA waspurifiedby a modi-fication ofa previousmethod that was notsizeselective and gave 30-80% recovery (4). Plasma,100Ml wasmade0.1MinTris-HC1,pH 8.0, 20 mM in EDTA, 1 Minsodiumperchlorate,and 1% in SDS. ProteinaseK(SigmaChemical Co., St.Louis, MO), 100
Mg/ml,
wasthenadded and the mixture incubatedat
550C
for 2 h. Itwasthen extracted sequentially, as described elsewhere (11), with phenol, phenol-chloroformandchloroform, precipitatedwith ethanol and dis-solved in 50ju of TE. HumanplacentalDNA(SigmaChemicalCo.) wasdenaturedat0.5 mg/ml inTEbyboilingfor 10 min followed byrapidcooling. DNAasedigestionof radiolabeledplasmaorONwas
with DNAase1,50ug/ml,at
370C
for 30 min.Incontrols, the DNAaseI washeat inactivatedat 100ICfor 10 min. ONwerepreparedfrom chickerythrocytes (Whittaker Bioproducts,Walkersville,MD), by
di-gestionofnuclei with micrococcal nuclease and storedat-20'C in the presence ofphenylmethylsulfonylfluorideasaprotease inhibitor(12).
Anti-DNA reactionswerecarried outwith antisera obtained from threepatientswithSLE,andwereallcapableofprecipitatingdsDNA (9). 10 glof ON or DNA in plasma wereincubated with 20 Ml of antiserumat
370C
for 30 min and thenat40C
for 1 h,followedby centrifugationat13,600g for 15 min. 20Mlof supernatant, treatedasbeforewithSDS,werethen examinedbyPAGE. Controlsemployed
antiserum that had been absorbed with 25
Mg/ml
each of native and heat-denatured humanplacentalDNAat371Cfor 30 min and40C
overnight.
RadiolabelingandPAGE.PurifiedDNAwasradiolabeledby nick-translationas
described
elsewhere(I 1), using[a-32PldCTP
from New1. Abbreviations usedinthis paper:ON, oligonucleosome; TE,
Tris-EDTAbuffer.
CirculatingDNA inSystemicLupusErythematosus 69 J.Clin. Invest.
© TheAmericanSociety forClinical Investigation, Inc.
0021-9738/90/07/0069/06 $2.00
England Nuclear(Boston, MA), 2-3,000 Ci/mM.DNAin dialyzed plasma and inON was labeled in exactly the same manner except that DNAasedigestion could be omitted for plasma, apparently because it issufficiently nicked in vivo. PAGE was on 6% polyacrylamide in 89 mMTris, 89mMboricacid,2 mMEDTA, pH8.0 (TBE) (I 1).Ina typicalexperiment, each sample lane contained theDNAderivedfrom 10 ploriginal plasma.DNAsize standards consisted of a Hae III digest of phi-XDNA(NewEnglandBiolabs, Beverly, MA). Radiolabeling of standards waseither by nick translation orby 5'-end-labeling (11). Whereindicated, labeledspecimens were treated with 1% SDS for> 10 minat20'C. Each sample lane contained 10,lof a 100-Mul labeling reaction mixturecontaining80
Al
of plasmaorON.Autoradiography was at4VC on Kodak X-Omat AR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Roches-ter,NY). Exposure timeswerevariedtoallowoptimum resolution of bandssothat bandintensitiesare notnecessarily comparable among different experiments.Experiments toexamine themobilities ofplasmaDNAbands upon re-electrophoresisweredone after electroelutionof individual excised bandsasdescribed elsewhere (1 1). The eluatewasthenreconcentrated by vacuumdialysisusingcollodion bags (Schleicher and Schuell, Inc., Keene,NH),following thedirections of the supplier.
Antihistone experiments.Amonoclonal antihistoneantibody
reac-tive with atrypsin-sensitive epitope accessible in oligonucleosomes and,ascontrol,amonoclonalantiacetylcholinesteraseantibody of the
same isotype(catalogue No. MABO52 and MAB304, respectively)
were purchased from ChemiconInternational, Inc. (El Segundo, CA). Thereactivity of the antihistoneantibodywithatrypsin-sensitive epi-topeonONwasconfirmed inpreliminary experimentswhere labeled ONwereincubatedat37°C for 30 min with 10or 100Mg/mltrypsin (Sigma) in the presence orabsence ofatwofold excessof soybean
trypsininhibitor(Sigma).
Antihistoneprecipitation experiments wereperformedon
dupli-catespecimens of five SLE plasmas andanONpreparation.Amixture
containing 10 MlofplasmacontaininglabeledDNA(generally
con-tainingbetween50,000and150,000cpm)ornucleosomal DNA,5Ml of either the monoclonal antihistoneortheanticholinesterase control antibody, 5 ul of 0.15Msodium chloride, 0.01 Msodium phosphate, pH 7.2(PBS) and Ig1ofsalmon sperm DNA(Sigma),10 mg/ml in TE,
wasincubated at 37°C for 45 min. Then 5 Ml of normalmouse serum
(Sigma),diluted 1:5 in PBSwasaddedand, afterincubatingat37°Cfor
15min, 15,ulof rabbit anti-mouse IgG(Sigma), 2 mg/ml in PBS,was addedfollowed by incubationat37°C for 60 min andat4°C
over-night.Themixturewasthencentrifugedat13,600 g for 15 min, the supernatantwasremoved, and theprecipitatewashedtwice with 20 Ml PBS. 50 MlofTEcontaining 1% SDSwasthen addedtothewashed
precipitateandthemixture incubatedat100°Cfor 1 hduringwhichit dissolved. Theduplicatesetsofspecimenswerethenexamined both by
electrophoresison 6% polyacrylamide in 1% SDS and TBE and by TCAprecipitation andcounting in ascintillation counter(Packard
Tri-Carb; model 300C) with a background of 29 cpm, which was subtractedfrom theresultingcounts. Anadditionalsetof control
ex-perimentswasperformed usingthesameprocedure andstarting with thesamefive SLE plasmas andpreparationof ON but with exogenous labeledDNAin place oflabeled endogenous plasma DNA. This
exoge-nousDNAconsisted ofelectrophoretically purified 190-310 bp Hae IIIfiragmentsofphi-XDNAthat hadbeen5'-end-labeled to an
ap-proximatespecificactivityof 1.8X107cpm/Mg.
Results
DNA
purifiedfrom
SLEplasma
exhibitsmultiple discrete
sizedistributions.
DNA, firstpurified
from whole SLE plasma and thenradiolabeled,
generally demonstrated four bands onPAGE withsizes correspondingto - 150-200, 400, 600, and
800
bp
(Fig.
1). Withsomespecimens
theseparation
betweenthe 600- and 800-bp bandswas indistinct so thatthe two
blended
together.
Mostorall oftheradioactivity appeared
to603 _l
31 0 - _/_
194-Figure1. DNA extractedfrom arepresentative group of12SLE plasmaspecimens,labeled by nick-translation and separated by PAGE.At the left are locations of DNA size markers in base pairs.
Inmostcases the bandsmigrating at - 150-200 bpis the strongest.
Bands at- 400, 600,and 800 bp are alsovisible although the sepa-ration between the 600- and 800-bp bands is frequently indistinct.
be associated withoneof these bands. Small amountsoflow molecularweightradioactivity were variably seen atthe bot-tomsof some lanes andrepresentedmolecules - 50bp longor
less. Mostoftheradioactivitywasusuallyin the 150-200-bp
bandwithprogressivelyless in each of the slower bands. All of 20 DNAspecimens that were examined were similar.
DNA radiolabeled in
plasma forms
discrete bands on PAGE. PAGE of 24 DNA specimens labeled in whole plasmaconsistently revealedtwo prominent bands on
autoradiogra-phy(Fig. 2A). Aslower, faint bandwasalso
frequently
seen. Bands ofother mobilities were also seen, but infrequently. Autoradiographic intensity was usually higher for the faster bands.Avariableamount ofradioactivity failedto enterthegel.
Treatmentwith SDS largelyeliminated thisbut alsochanged
the mobilities of the bands, as willbe discussed. To confirm
thatthe labeledmaterialwas in fact DNA, itwasshownthat, inasubgroupof specimens, digestion withDNAaseI, butnot
inactivated DNAaseI,eliminatedtheradioactive bands. Also, incubation with each of three different anti-dsDNA-contain-ing antisera removed>90% oftheradioactivity from the gel. Priorabsorption ofthe antisera with DNAabolished this
ac-tivity.
ThefastestDNA band inplasma,whichalso wasthe most
intense, migrated moreslowlythandidthefastest band inthe DNA extracted from plasma (Fig. 2 B), consistent with the
interpretation that, in plasma, the migration of thisDNA
spe-cies had been retarded, presumably by
binding
toprotein.
Purified DNA that had first been radiolabeled while in
whole plasma and then extracted gave a bandingpattern on
PAGE similar to that ofDNA labeled after extraction from plasma. Thus, each of the molecular species seen in DNA
labeled after purification from plasma was accessible to the labelingreagentsbefore extraction. Also,nomolecular
species
was labeled in plasma that was not also labeledafter
extrac-tion.Toexplore the effect ofplasma
protein
binding
onthegel
mobility ofDNA, an attempt was made to add purified,
la-beled plasma DNA back to unlabeled plasma. This resulted
electro-A.
C,,
OZU)a z
z cln a
B.
SDS
P
S
F
S
F
Figure 2. Autoradiographicbandingpatternof SLE plasma DNAon
PAGE.Specimens fromthree patientsareshown in each of the three
panels, A,Band C. DNA marker locationsareindicatedatthe leftas
inFig. 1. (A) Whole plasma containing labeled DNA, 10g perwell. Bandsmigratingnearthe603- and 194-bp markerswereuniformly
observed.Also,abandjust ahead of the 872-bp markerwas
occa-sionallyseen asinthespecimenatthe far left.(B) DNA extracted fromplasma and thenradiolabeled, similartoFig. 1and shown here
forcomparison. (C) DNA in plasma, labeledasbefore but with 1% SDSadded. Thebandingpatternisgenerally similartothatseen
with DNAextracted fromplasma. Autoradiographic signals extend-ing irregularly toward thebottoms of the lanesareartifactual.
static interaction with plasma components. Incubation at
370C for 30min did notalter this. A similar result was
ob-tained when purified plasmaDNAwasreplaced byalabeled Hae IIIdigest of phi-X DNA.
SDStreatment.Treatment ofplasmawith SDS resultedin
aDNA bandingpatternthatwassimilar tothat of DNA ex-tracted fromplasma (Fig.2C).Thissuggestedthat SDS treat-ment largely released plasma DNA from association with
re-tarding molecules and allowed ittomigratein plasma essen-tially as free DNA. The mobility of uncomplexed control DNA, added toSDS-treated plasma, migrated no differently from DNA inbuffer alone. SDStreatmentgave more homoge-neous DNA bands in plasma than were seen with purified DNA, probably because of damage during purification.
Comparison with ON. Radiolabeled ON behaved on PAGEasshown inFig. 3 A. Attemptstoexamine themobility of labeled ON addedtoplasmaresulted in mostorall of the
addedradiolabel failingto enter thegelandremainingas
ag-gregatesattheorigin. Insomeexperimentsafaint band could
be observedto enterthegelbut thiswasnotreproducible.This
observationwassimilartothat made after addition ofpurified labeled DNAtoplasma, just described, and is assumed alsoto
be dueto aggregateformationwithplasma proteins. Replacing plasma with serum, incubation ofplasma-ON mixtures at
370C foraslongas 16 h andpredigestion of ON withtrypsin allfailedtoalter this result. Inbuffer,ONgaveaseries of bands migratingmoreslowlythan did DNA inplasma. Partial
pro-teolysis with trypsin increased their mobility, but they still
Figure 3. Autoradiographicpatternsof DNAonPAGE. (A) Behavior
of chick ON containing labeledDNAonPAGE. As indicatedatthe top,thelanescontain, from lefttoright, ON inbuffer, ON treated with SDS and DNA extracted from ON and then labeled. The multi-plebandingpatternof ON in buffer is similartothat of DNA in plasma, but slower,atleast for the fast band. Treatment of ON with SDS resultsinapatternsimilartothat ofDNAextracted from ON which shows the expected 200-bp ladder and resembles thatseenin
Fig. 1B forpurified plasma DNA. (B) Behavior inSDS of individual
plasma DNA bands. Lane P contains labeled DNA in plasma (10IL), nottreated with SDS. Thenext twolanes, S andF,contain the
ex-cised, electroeluted slow and fast bands, respectively, again without SDS. Thenexttwolanes, labeled SDS, contain thesesameslow and fast bands butafterSDStreatment.The slowbandyieldeda
pre-dominant bandat400bp andafainter bandat200bp, identical in mobilitytothe single bandseenafter SDStreatmentof the fast band, showninthe last laneattheright. Each S and F lane contains elec-troeluted and reconcentratedDNAobtained from 27gloforiginal plasma.
remained slower thanDNA inplasma whosemobilitywasnot
consistently altered by trypsin. Treatment of ON with SDS
resulted in DNA bands that migrated almost identicallywith
bands of labeled, purified ONDNA and whichexhibited the
200-bp ladder typical of ON (13). Thus, both theSDS-treated
ON and their extracted DNA gave banding patterns that
closely resembled those of plasmaDNA.
Studiesofthe isolatedplasmaDNA bands. DNApurified
from material recovered after electroelution ( 11) of the faster of the two majorDNA bands in plasma showed it to be
150-200 bp in size. Similar experiments with the slower, fainterDNAbandrepeatedly failedtoyield enoughDNAfor
visualization. However,as seen in Fig. 3 B, treatment of the separately isolatedfast and slowbands withSDS,followedby
repeat electrophoresis, resulted in the fast band migratingat
150-200 bp, similar to its purified DNA. The slow plasma band yielded a major band at 400 bp and a faint band at
150-200 bp.
Detection of histone bound toDNA inplasma. In an
at-temptatdirect identification of histones in the fast DNA band
in plasma, the latter was examined, after electroelution, by
A
1
B
C
-I(F.
872
603
-
310-194
i
872
-603
-310
1
194-SDS-PAGE (12). Protein staining failed to reveal a typical
histonebandingpattern, although these would probably have beenobscured by the largeamountof plasma proteinpresent. In an alternate approach, five radiolabeled
DNA-contain-ingplasmaspecimenswereimmunoprecipitatedwith either a monoclonal antihistone or with a control monoclonal
anti-body.Theantihistone-produced precipitates containedtwo- to
eightfoldmoreTCA-precipitableradioactivity (range 1.7-16%
of the total TCA radioactivityineachspecimen)thandidthe controls (Table I), a statistically significant difference (P
< 0.05). As already noted, attempts to add labeled ON to
plasma consistently yielded mainly large aggregates,
prevent-ing itsuse as apositivecontrol. However, ONinbuffergave
immunoprecipitation results similar to those seen with the plasmaspecimens.
Examination ofthe redissolved immunoprecipitates by
electrophoresis (Fig. 4) demonstrated,inthosethat gave a visi-ble
signal,
DNAbandscorrespondinginsize to about 200and 400bpasexpectedwhereaslittleor no autoradiographicsignalwas seen in thecorrespondingareasforcontrolprecipitates. In
addition a faint DNA band, correspondingto - 50-100 bp
was seen bothinthe plasmaspecimensas well as in the
prepa-rationof ON. Finally,the absence of a visible 400-bp band in
this
preparation
of ON suggested thatit may have beenpar-tially degraded.
Toexaminethepossibilitythatfree histones, which might
have been present in plasma, could have nonspecifically boundtolabeledDNAthereby accounting for its precipitation by antihistone, another set of simultaneous control
experi-ments was performed. Purified, radiolabeled DNA,
- 200-300 bp long,wasaddedtoeach
of
thesameplasma andON specimens, this time without radiolabeling the endoge-nous plasma-derived DNA so that all the radioactivity was
containedin theadded "naked" DNA. Thespecimens were then
subjected
tothe sameimmunoprecipitation
procedure. Therewas no significant difference(P > 0.5) betweenthera-dioactivityin theantihistone (mean=909cpm or 0.1 0%ofthe
866,180 cpm added) and control
precipitates
(mean = 794cpm)sothat
nonspecific
binding ofDNAby free plasmahis-toneisanunlikely
explanation
for plasmaDNAprecipitation
by antihistone.
Discussion
Thepresent dataindicate thatDNApurified fromSLEplasma
does not exist as a continuous distribution of size species as
TableI.
TCAprecipitablecpm
Plasma Antihistone Control
specimen Total precipitate precipitate
Plasma1 103,302 1,818 883 Plasma 2 169,664 9,068 1,032 Plasma3 43,803 1,729 743 Plasma4 57,276 9,199 1,134 Plasma5 77,167 3,536 1,504
Mean(±SD) 5,070(±3,779) 1,059(±289)
ON 1.7 X106 67,597 434
1
2
3
4
5
NS
H C
HC
HC
HC
HC
HC
603
-194
-Figure 4. Radiolabeled plasmaDNAafter precipitation with
antihis-tone(H)oranticholinesterase control (C) antibodies, after resolubili-zationat 100°C in SDS and separatedonSDS-PAGE.Specimens 1-5arederivedfrom SLE plasmas and NS is from chick ON. The size markersareheat-denaturedHae IIIphi-Xfragments.Lanes at
theleft edge of the gelareslightlydistorted dueto adrying artifact.
Ineach antihistone precipitate a radioactive signalwasvisible on the
originalautoradiographand exceeded inintensitythe controlsignal
which was generally not visible. These results were consistent with thoseobtained fromdeterminingtheTCA-precipitable radioactivity
by scintillation counting, shown in TableI.
would be expected ifit consisted ofrandomly fragmented
DNA molecules. Instead, it occurs ina series of distinct size distributions whose gel mobilitiesare consistent with their being derived from multimeric molecules witha unit size of
- 200 bp. The largestspecies clearlyseen was - 800bp,but
small amountsof larger forms
might
nothavebeendetected.Theseapparent multimersappear to account formost ofthe
plasmaDNA. Theeffects of SDStreatmentand of
immuno-precipitation
suggest further that plasmaDNA iscomplexed
withprotein that consists, atleastinpart,of histone.
Failureof antihistoneto reactwithahigher proportion of plasmaDNAcouldhaveresultedfrom eitherloss or
inaccessi-bility
ofthetrypsin-sensitive
ONepitopesknown to bereactive with the monoclonal antihistone antibody(14).
This could have been due, for example, either to prior proteolysis or,alternatively,
to blockage ofthe monoclonal antihistone by previously bound endogenousantihistones. Neither oftheseexplanations
wasexaminedhere.These molecular characteristics of plasmaDNA aresimilar
to those of ON, the structural units of
chromatin,
where, ineachmonomer,bound histone
partially
protects about 200bp of associated DNAfrom nucleasedigestion
in vitro(13, 15).
The consequence is that DNA extracted from partially
nu-clease-digested
chromatin exhibits a characteristic200-bp
"ladder" on electrophoresis. However, mononucleosome
DNA can befurther
digested
sothat, afterpurification,
addi-tionalmoleculesranging
insizefrom 150-200bp
are seen. Also, several sizespecies
inthe rangeof 50to 1 10bphave beenpurified from plasma isstrikinglysimilar to thatfound forON, bothhere andinthe literature.
It is therefore concluded that the ON-like structure ob-served here for plasma DNAisconsistentwithits having been derived from cellular ON with atleast partialretention oftheir
structuralfeatures.
TheelectrophoreticbehaviorofDNAin the electroeluted
fastandslow plasma bandsfollowingtreatmentwithSDS sug-gests DNA contents consistent with ON-like monomers and
dimers, respectively. However, this could be directly
con-firmedwith purified DNA onlyforthefastband.
Whether theslow band infact contains DNA molecules of 400
bp depends
upon theassumption
thatSDStreatmentof thecomplexesin theslow band resultsin DNA thatmigratesasfree molecules, a
likely
but unprovedassumption. Itthusremainspossiblethat theON-like mobilityofDNAin whole
plasma isdetermined by bindingtoplasmaproteins,although
this seems unlikely since, asnoted, that would leave
unex-plainedthemobilities ofDNA observed afterSDS treatment
of theisolated slowandfast bands.Itis emphasized, however, that identification of specific DNA bands seen in whole plasma with specific nucleosome-related structures, a large numberof which have been described(14-16), would be pre-mature.
Even though it appears likely that the present data are
explained byan ON-like structure ofplasma DNA, itis
ap-propriate to consider alternate explanations. Although
non-histone, DNA-binding proteinsare presentinthe nucleus(17) and couldperhapsgenerateplasma DNA-protein complexes, theyarepresent inmuch smalleramountsthanhistones and,
further,
cannot asreadily explain
the observedsize distribution of thepurifiedDNA. However,our currentunderstanding of theseproteins
is stilltoorudimentary
toeliminate thispossibil-ity with certainty. Similarly, neither plasmaDNA
binding
proteins (18) norbound anti-DNA
antibodies,
ifpresent,could
easily
accountfortheobserved plasmaDNAsize distri-bution. Although anti-dsDNA antibodiespartially
protect DNAfromnucleases,
thelengthprotected isonly
about40 bp (19). Moreover, theseexplanations
wouldnotaccountfor the reactivity of plasma DNAwith antihistoneantibody.
How-ever, theseconsiderations do notexcludethepossibility
that DNA present in plasma, even in the form of ON-likecom-plexesaspostulated,
might
form additionalbonds,
eitherspe-cific or
nonspecific,
with otherplasma
molecules. Inthisre-gard, it is
emphasized
that most SLEplasma
specimens
ex-hibiting
free DNA,asfoundhere,
andashasbeenourgeneral
experience,
donotalso contain free anti-dsDNA detectableby
binding
assays.However,
thepresenceofboundantibody,
un-detectable in this way
by
virtue ofexcess dsDNAantigen,
cannotbe excluded bythese data
but,
asnoted,
wouldseemunlikely
toaffect thepresent results.Because the study patientswere selected forhaving large
amountsof plasmaDNAinassociation with vasculitisor CNS
involvement,
theextent towhich these resultscanbe general-izedis uncertain.However, severalpreviousreports(3, 5, 20, 21) ofDNA isolated from plasma of SLE patientswho hadapparently
not been selected in this manner found it to be between100 and 200bp
insizeasis thecaseforthepredomi-nant
species
described here and thussupportsthegenerality
of thesefindings.
Inaddition,
one of these reports describes a300-bp
species
ofDNA fromserum ofoneSLEpatient (21).
Fromthe datapresented itseems
possible
thatthisDNAspe-cies was the same as that considered to be - 400 bp in the
presentstudy since the 8% polyacrylamide gel used there pro-videdless precise size discrimination in this region than does the 6% gel used here. Failure in those studies to describe larger molecular species consistent with multimeric forms as de-scribed here could have resulted from other differences in tech-nique. For example, the use here of nick-translation, which incorporates the radiolabel throughout the DNA molecule,
would beexpected to enhancesensitivityof detectionof longer
molecules relative toshorterones, in contrast tomethods that incorporate the radiolabel only at chain termini, as employed in atleastonesuchstudy. Also, failureinthe presentstudyto recognize a 17.5-kb DNA molecule, as described in another report(22), cannot beattributedtoomission ofproteolysisas wassuggested toexplainthat result. It wasobservedhere, how-ever,that, without SDS, much of the DNA was in aggregates toolargeto enterthegel, as was also reportedinthatstudy. However,this could have been due to the low ionicstrengthof thegel buffer.Nonetheless,thepossibilitythat a small fraction of DNA of large size eluded detection in the present study cannotbe excluded.
The significance of recognizing an ON-like structure for SLE plasma DNA is severalfold. First, it is consistent with otherevidencesuggestingthat this DNA islargelyor entirely derivedfrom DNA in thehumannucleus (4, 23), rather than from a non-genomically integrated viral agent, for example, as has been described in at least one other clinical state (24).
Second, it hasbeen proposedthat
autoimmunity
in SLE re-sultsfrom animmunogen-driven mechanism, incontrast to alessspecific mechanismsuch aspolyclonalimmuneactivation
(25). One piece ofevidence for this isthe reported
concor-dance,in individual patients, ofantibodies directedat
mole-cules that occur in nature asmacromolecularcomplexes but
thatotherwise appear
quite
different structurally (25). Anti-bodiesto histonesand DNA havebeen reported to occurinsuch "linkedsets,"thussuggestingthat ahistone-DNA
macro-molecular complex, presumably ON derived, mightact as
theircommon
autoimmunogen.
The presentfinding
thatsuchanextracellular histone-DNA complex does in fact occur in vivo, in SLE plasma, and, in addition, that it possesses the spectrum of DNA sizes expected of an ON-like complex is
consistent with suchan
immunogen-driven
mechanism.In adifferentcontext,theoccurrenceof SLE plasmaDNA
in ON-like complexes
implies
potentialautoantibody-recogni-tionofnon-DNA components of thecomplex(13, 26), which could thereforecontributetoDNA-containing immune
com-plex formation
independently
of anti-DNAandwhich might meritfurther study.Similarly, positively
charged sitesknown to bepresent on such non-DNA componentsofON(15)couldallowbindingto
negatively
charged moietiesin the glomerular basement membrane and mediate formation ofDNA-an-tiDNA immune complexesin situas hasbeenpostulatedto
occur
(1).
IfSLEplasmaDNA occursintheform ofadouble
super-coil ofDNA
tightly
wound about ahistonecore,asis thecasefor ON
(13, 15),
consequent structural constraintsmight
beexpectedtohavean
important influence,
difficult topredict,
onits
reactivity
with anti-DNA antibodies andon thebehavior ofimmunecomplexes
soformed,
asfor example,incomple-mentactivation ortissue deposition, thatwouldrequire
fur-ther
investigation
oftheseimportant
phenomena. Also, thepossibility shouldbeconsidered that antibodies might
entially react with both of the two adjacent dsDNA strands wound about the same core, either as two separate but contigu-ousbinding sites that might permit a form of monogamous
bivalentbinding (27)or, morespeculatively, that the separate
chains might form asingle, new epitopeif they were spaced
closelyenough.
ExtracellularON-likecomplexes generatedin vivo do not appear to have beenstudied previously. Therefore, assuming it is correct that SLE plasma DNA has such astructure,it might differ in unexpected ways fromONpreparedin vitro, chiefly from avian erythrocytes, which provide muchofour current
knowledgeaboutthese complexes (13).Suchdifferencescould beimmunologically important and,inaddition, might provide insight into mechanisms oftheir release into thecirculation
which is not nowunderstood.
In this last regard, a particularly significant question is whether the ON-like structureof SLE plasma DNA is gener-ated within an intact nucleus, a phenomenon that is a hall-mark of apoptotic (in contrast to necrotic) cell death, a
well-definedprocess that characterizesavariety of important
physiologic events, including some with immunologic rele-vance (28).
Itis uncertain whether ON generated during apoptosiscan escapephagocytosis, with which it is closely associated, and thusgain access to theextracellular fluid, at least on a large
enoughscalefor detectioninplasma. The present data would
be consistent withthat
possibility,
however, atleast in SLE.Clearly, however,much moreinformation isneeded to
clarify
thesequestions.
Acknowledgments
WewishtothankMs. M.Langefor her technical assistanceand Dr. D.
Kaplanforacriticalreading of the manuscript.
This workwassupported inpartbygrantsfrom the National
Insti-tutesof Health, The SLE Foundation, Inc. andfromthe NewYork Chapter oftheArthritis Foundation.
References
1.Zvaifler, N.Z., andV. L. Wood, Jr. 1985.Etiologyand
patho-genesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.InTextbookof
Rheumatol-ogy. W. N.Kelly, E.D.Harris, Jr., S. Ruddy,andC.B.Sledge, editors.
W. B.SaundersCo.,Philadelphia,PA. 1042-1070.
2.Davis, G. L., Jr., and J. S. DavisIV. 1973. Detection of circulat-ingDNAbycounterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE). ArthritisRheum. 16:52-58.
3. McCoubrey-Hoyer,A., T. B.Okarma, andH. R.Holman. 1984. Partialpurificationandcharacterization of plasmaDNAandits
rela-tiontodisease activityin SLE.Am.J.Med. 77:23-34.
4.Steinman,C.R. 1984.CirculatingDNAin systemic lupus
ery-thematosus. Isolation and Characterization. J. Clin. Invest. 73:832-841.
5.Sano,H., and C. Morimoto. 1982. DNAisolated from DNA/
anti-DNAantibodyimmune complexes in systemic lupus
erythema-tosusisrich inguanine-cytosinecontent.J.Immunol. 128:1341-1345. 6.Raptis,L., andH. A.Menard. 1980.Quantitationand
character-ization of plasmaDNAin normals andpatientswith systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Clin.Invest.66:1391-1399.
7. Steinman,C. R. 1979.CirculatingDNA insystemic lupus ery-thematosus. Associationwith centralnervoussysteminvolvement and
systemicvasculitis.Am.J.Med.67:429-435.
8.Tan E.M.,A. S.Cohen,J. F.Fries,A.T.Masi,D. J.McShane,
N. F.Rothfield,J.G.Schaller,N.Talal,andR. J. Winchester. 1982. The 1982 revised criteria for theclassification ofsystemic lupus
ery-thematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 25:1271-1277.
9.Steinman,C.R. 1982. Detection andsemiquantitationof DNA
by counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE).MethodsEnzymol. 84:187-193.
10.Steinman,C.R.,U.Deesomchok,andH.Spiera. 1976. Detec-tion of anti-DNAantibody using synthetic antigens.Characterization
andclinicalsignificanceofbindingof
poly(deoxyadenylate-deoxythy-midylate) byserum.J. Clin.Invest. 57:1330-1341.
11.Maniatis, T.,E. F. Frisch,andJ. Sambrook. 1982.Molecular Cloning.Alaboratorymanual. ColdSpring Harbor Laboratory,Cold
Spring Harbor,NY.545pp.
12. Goodman, M.,and A.Dahlberg. 1982.Electrophoresisof
nu-cleoproteins.In GelElectrophoresisofNucleicAcids,aPractical
Ap-proach.D.Rickwood and B. D.Hames,editors. IRL PressLtd., Ox-ford. 199-225.
13. Kornberg, R. D. 1977. Structure ofchromatin. Annu. Rev.
Biochem. 46:931-954.
14.Bakayev,V. V.,T.G.Bakayeva,andA. J.Varshavsky. 1977.
Nucleosomes andsubnucleosomes: Heterogeneity andcomposition.
Cell. 11:619-629.
15.McGhee,J.D.,and G.Felsenfeld. 1980. Nucleosomestructure. Annu.Rev. Biochem. 49:1115-1156.
16. Sollner-Webb, B., R. D. Camerini-Otero, and G. Felsenfeld.
1976.Chromatinstructure asprobed by nucleases andproteases: evi-dence for the central role of histones H3 and H4.Cell.9:179-193.
17.Lewin, B. 1983. Repressor isadimer that binds cooperativelyat eachoperator. In Genes. 2nd Edition. B. Lewin, editor. John Wiley
andSons,New York. 266-271.
18. Hoch,S., andE.McVey. 1977.Purification and
characteriza-tion of twomajor DNA-binding proteins inhumanserum. J. Biol.
Chem.252:1881-1887.
19. Emlen,W.R.,Ansari, and G. Burdick. 1984. DNA-anti-DNA
immunecomplexes: Antibody protection ofadiscreteDNAfragment
fromDNAase digestion in vitro. J. Clin. Invest.74:185-190. 20. Fournie, G. J. 1988. Circulating DNA andlupus nephritis. KidneyInt. 33:487-497.
21.Morimoto, C.,H.Sano,T.Abe,M.Homma, andA.D. Stein-berg. 1982. Correlation between clinical activity of systemic lupus erythematosus and theamountsof DNA inDNA/anti-DNA antibody immune complexes. J. Immunol. 139:1960-1965.
22.Rieber, M., C. E.Contreras,M.S.Rieber,and N. E.Bianco.
1986.NovelDNA-protein complex andalarge DNA in SLE cryopre-cipitates.Clin. Exp. Immunol. 66:61-67.
23.Li, J. Z.,andC. R.Steinman. 1989. PlasmaDNAin systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis Rheum. 32:726-733.
24. Hung,P.P.,J.C. Mao, C.M.Ling,and L. R.Overby. 1975. Hybridization ofDaneparticleDNA with the free plasmaDNA of hepatitis carriers. Nature (Lond.). 253:571-572.
25. Craft, J., and J. A. Hardin. 1987. Linkedsetsof antinuclear antibodies: What do they mean? J. Rheum. 14(Suppl.): 106-109.
26.Bustin, M. 1979. Immunological approachestochromatin and chromosome structure and function. Curr. TopicsMicrobiol.
Im-munol. 88:105-142.
27. Day,E. D.1972.Antibody reactions with multivalent antigens. AdvancedImmunochemistry.WilliamsandWilkins,Baltimore,MD.
311-356.
28.Wylie,A.H.1987.Apoptosis: Cell death in tissue regulation.J.