Moral judgments
Dynamic Moral Judgments and Emotions
... as moral judgments change in light of exposure to further information about the morally dubious action referred to in a moral ...make moral judgments a similar design was used as that ...
10
Motus Animi in Mente Insana: An Emotion Oriented Paradigm of Legal Insanity Informed by the Neuroscience of Moral Judgments and Decision Making
... Personality Disorder is characterized by a pervasive pattern of disregard for the rights of other people, which often manifests as hostility, aggression, or both. Deceit and manipulation are also central features. People ...
71
How clinicians make (or avoid) moral judgments of patients: implications of the evidence for relationships and research
... make moral judgments of their ...tive judgments or about their impact on patient care and on the clinicians ...how moral judgment emerges from the interplay of rival brain neurocircuits in the ...
14
9-13-2013 12:00 AM The Process Dissociation of Moral Judgments: Clarifying the Psychology of Deontology and Utilitarianism
... dilemma judgments: people with antisocial personality traits made more utilitarian overt judgments ...utilitarian judgments is not because they experience stronger utilitarian inclinations; rather it ...
142
Utilitarian Moral Judgments Are Cognitively Too Demanding
... Automatic and deliberative cognitive processes should mediate moral judgments [13]. Most cognitive psychologists currently favor a dual-system approach [14] in which two systems compete for control of our ...
13
Utilitarian Moral Judgments Are Cognitively Too Demanding
... Automatic and deliberative cognitive processes should mediate moral judgments [13]. Most cognitive psy- chologists currently favor a dual-system approach [14] in which two systems compete for control of our ...
9
Contemporary morality: moral judgments in digital contexts
... of Moral Judgment, as we showed that the use of smartphones, often assumed to be hurried which would be consistent with gut-feeling decision-making, increased the likelihood of utilitarian responses and decreased ...
35
Psychology Data from an Exploration of the Effect of Anticipatory Stress on Disgust vs. Non-Disgust Related Moral Judgments
... on moral con- demnation—participants in the anticipatory stress con- dition showed more moral condemnation than control participants (see Figure 1), with no moderation by disgust ...on moral ...
6
Re evaluating moral disgust:Sensitivity to many affective states predicts extremity in many evaluative judgments
... which moral judgments are a subset), and may not readily extend to non-evaluative judgments, for example, of quantity, spatial distance, and other such “objective” judgments, in which affect ...
74
Variations in judgments of intentional action and moral evaluation across eight cultures
... and moral judgments of praise or blame, they show that factoring status can help dissociate these two dimensions and thus could help in figuring out those mechanisms in future ...
40
A Kantian Reconciliation of Moral Realism and Moral Supervenience
... between moral and non-moral ...the moral supervenience ...of moral duties that Kant defends in the Groundwork (1785/1998) and hence supervenience with ...
194
No Moral Progress without an Objective Moral Ontology
... standard. One simply has to show that the truth of the premise is more likely than its falsehood. The truth of the first two premises follows from the definitions as explained in the sections dealing with these premises. ...
7
Index Terms Moral distress, moral distress scale, factors contributing to moral distress.
... cause moral distress to health care providers. Moral distress is defined as emotional stress of the health care worker due to ethically conflicting situations(Kälvemark, Höglund, Hansson, Westerholm, & ...
6
Value judgments and value neutrality in economics
... When value judgments are redefined so as to include prescriptions, it becomes tempting to overplay the rôle of the latter within the enlarged category. Archibald's first sentence, which contrasts "positive ...
29
Moral testimony, moral virtue and the value of autonomy
... a moral judgement based on moral testimony is shared between myself and those who claim to be moral testimony ...taking moral testimony in the required sense, then the entire dispute is poorly ...
26
Gibbardian Humility: Moral Fallibility and Moral Smugness
... accommodate the idea that moral value is mind independent. But now Street sees a danger in the quasi-realist project. To the extent that quasi-realists do earn themselves this right, they risk opening themselves ...
16
The triangle inequality constraint in similarity judgments
... To assess putative MTI violations for each triplet, we required three similarity ratings, so that for the countries stimuli there were overall 57 similarity ratings and for the general s[r] ...
26
Modeling and debiasing resource saving judgments
... made judgments of only one production line with two successive production speed increases, they should become aware of the fact that the same proportional speed or difference im- provement from a lower original ...
14
Tools of Ignorance: An Appraisal of Deficiency Judgments
... 29, 2013), https://deadlyclear.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/deficiency-judgments-is- your-court-a-collection-agency-for-crooks-class-action-filed-in-hawaii/ (last visited Apr. 2, 2015) (detailing the complaint for ...
71
Criminal Judgments as Evidence in Civil Cases
... Criminal Judgments as Evidence in Civil Cases SMU Law Review Volume 11 | Issue 2 Article 9 1957 Criminal Judgments as Evidence in Civil Cases Thomas H Davis IV Follow this and additional works at http[.] ...
8