[PDF] Top 20 1 of 100 DOCUMENTS. No. B Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division One

... trial court agreed, exercising restraint to overcome its instinct to set a higher amount in view of the insurer's egregious abuse of ...(4) Appellate Review § 161.2--Imposition of Sanctions for Frivolous ... See full document

... government agency under applicable law including individual statutory claims or disputes (‘Covered Disputes’), that Covered Disputes are such claims or disputes that have to do with an Employee’s seeking, attempted, ... See full document

... the appeal was taken from the March 10, 2014 order granting Shell’s motion for summary ...No appeal lies from an order granting a motion for summary judgment, as that is merely a preliminary nonappealable ... See full document

... Section 11583 does not contain a scienter requirement. Thus, whether appellant intended the reimbursement of respondent's medical expenses to be something other than an advance or partial payment is not determinative. As ... See full document

... DOES 1 through 80, inclusive, were the agents, representatives and/or employees of each other and were at all times acting within the course and scope of said agency, representation and/or employment and pursuant ... See full document

... of Court, rule 8.495.) Other California rules of court, such as rule ...The California Constitution requires the Judicial Council to adopt rules for court administration, and practice ... See full document

... At his deposition, Dr. Weinstein affirmed that (1) he had expressed all opinions he intended to give at trial concerning the cause of plaintiff’s wrist injury, and (2) he would advise plaintiff if he formed any ... See full document

... sought court appointment of a “rents, issues and profits” receiver based on Central Metal’s default, and Central Metal filed for bankruptcy in an effort to forestall the receivership ...trial court granted ... See full document

... On June 15, 2012, Fleming filed an "anti-SLAPP" motion, asserting that the complaint arose from constitutionally protected activity. (§ 425.16, subd. (b)(1) ["A cause of action against a person ... See full document

... 67.) Second, if the lawsuit affects constitutional rights, the court determines if there is a reasonable probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the merits of his ... See full document

... that will constitute a breach of the peace, leaving that matter for continuing development by the courts.” (4 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Secured Transactions in Personal Property, § 178, p. 745.) “In ... See full document

... Alternatively, plaintiff argues her complaint falls outside the purview of the anti- SLAPP statute because defendants‘ constitutionally protected activities were ―merely incidental‖ to misconduct alleged. ―A cause of ... See full document

... States District Court for violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, title 18 of the United States Code section 1961 et ...on one of those checks made out to cash in the sum ... See full document

... the California State University, it is actually received by the Trustees of the California State ...the court executive officer, court clerk/administrator, court clerk, or secretariat ... See full document

... Travelers opposed the petition, contending an appraisal was not proper on the following grounds: (1) this was a dispute over the scope of coverage, not the amount of loss, and was therefore not a proper subject ... See full document

... employment from CarMax on October 31, 2006, and he acknowledged receipt of the Associate Handbook on November 9, 2006. The October 31, 2006 letter offering him employment states that he was to start October 16 (which ... See full document

... unless one of several events occur, the relevant event here being that “[s]ubstantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the ... See full document

... the court arrived at that determination without evaluating the extent to which the plaintiffs’ theory of proof might be sufficient, factually and legally, to render proof of some or all of these liability issues ... See full document

... Supreme Court affirmed. (Julian, supra, 35 Cal.4th at pp. 759-761.) The court reasoned that (1) “an insurer is not absolutely prohibited from drafting and enforcing policy provisions that provide or ... See full document

... approval‘ system, under which, in the words of Insurance Code section 1861.05, subdivision (a), the Insurance Commissioner must approve a rate applied for by an insurer before its use . . . .‖ (20th Century Ins. Co. v. ... See full document