[PDF] Top 20 An update of stabilisation exercises for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

... Cochrane Back Review Group and in keeping with the original 2008 systematic review ...2008 review was taken directly from the published review ... See full document

... 2008 systematic review by May and Johnson, which included 18 trials up to 2006, concluded that specific sta- bilisation exercises may be beneficial over no treatment, but went on to report that it ... See full document

... an update on this topic now demonstrating the likelihood of a beneficial effect of LLLT on low back ...current meta- analysis was substantially increased due to the inclusion of two ... See full document

... Objective: Low back pain (LBP) and pelvic pain including pelvic girdle pain (PGP) are very common discom- fort during ...this meta analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ... See full document

... The pain and functional status outcomes analysed in the current review were measured in each study close to 3 months after the initial ...of pain and functional ... See full document

... Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent types of chronic pain in clinical practice ...that low back pain affects 4–33% of the population at any given point, and ... See full document

... other meta-analyses in this field of research revealing that high work-related psychosocial risk factors such as high workload, low job control, and low social support not only increase the risk for ... See full document

... Critical Review Form for Quantita- tive Studies (Additional file 3) will be used to assess the individual studies as it is applicable to all types of quanti- tative study designs [33, ... See full document

... Historically, low back pain has been the most common reason for visits to osteopathic physicians ...of low back care provided by osteopathic physicians is oste- opathic manipulative ... See full document

... study [50] several times for additional data that could be used in the current analysis, but unfortunately this data was not made available. Subsequently, we needed to transform these data to determine means and ... See full document

... this review, as it will only involve the collation of previously published liter- ...This systematic review will collect and collate results from the numerous studies which have investi- gated ... See full document

... this review since just over 60% of the studies could be used in the ana- ...previous review [10], and other reviews [2], the poor quality studies in this re- view generally did not provide a definition of ... See full document

... is pain and discomfort, lo- calised below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds, with or without leg ...for pain, while prevention trials had to report an incidence ... See full document

... of back pain disorder in women and married nurses in comparison to men and single ...lower pain threshold, and physical changes due to monthly menstruation, can be a reason for such dis- orders in ... See full document

... all meta-analyses, we used a random-effects model to calculate mean prevalence rates and 95% con- fidence ...performing meta-analysis of prevalence ... See full document

... this systematic review will be summarized both qualitatively and quantitatively where ...A meta-analysis will be completed where possible using STATA Version 13 and Review Manager ... See full document

... The back-specific core sets of outcome measures rec- ommended by Deyo et ...of pain, function, well-being, disability, and work disability ...made back-specific recom- mendations to measure ... See full document

... be low clinical heterogeneity and accordingly it was appropriate to perform a meta-analysis where ...of pain, disability or function. As pain scores were reported on different scales, ... See full document

... this review [16, 18–20, ...widespread, low-back, knee and foot and thus these were included in the quantitative ana- lysis ( n = 14) [16, 35–37, 39–43, 47–49, 51, ...the meta-analysis ... See full document

... review was prospectively registered on International Pro- spective Register of Systematic Reviews 2015 (registration number: CRD42015027228). Electronic searches for articles were conducted using the ... See full document