• No results found

Design of Low Power Encoder using different MOS techniques for a 4 bit Flash ADC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Design of Low Power Encoder using different MOS techniques for a 4 bit Flash ADC"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1410

Published By:

Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication

Retrieval Number: F392901048619/19©BEIESP

Abstract: Among all architectures, Flash ADCs are most preferred ones. The main reason for selecting Flash ADC is due to its high speed of operation. The two important building blocks for the Flash ADC are Comparator and Encoder. In this paper a mux based encoder with resolution 4 is proposed and implemented using CMOS, Pass Transistors and Transmission Gate logic. Simulation results shows that encoder with Transmission Gate logic has less delay compared to Encoder with CMOS Logic. Simulation is carried out with Mentor Graphics tool with a supply voltage of 1.2 V using 130nm technology.

Index Terms:- Flash ADC, Encoder, Transmission Gate, CMOS.

I.INTRODUCTION

Today due to the demand for high speed applications we require the devices with less delay. In order to convert the analog signal into a digital signal, we require ADCs. Different types of ADCs are available out of which, depending on the requirement, a suitable ADC shall be selected. The Flash ADC is selected for its high speed and low resolution. The encoders are the power hungry components. So the encoders are designed with different logics and will be compared in terms of power dissipation and delay.

A. ENCODER

Design of Flash ADC requires Encoders and comparators. Encoders consume more power. In order to check power consumption of an encoder we use different technologies such as CMOS logic, Pass transistor logic and Transmission gate logic. Several parameters, such as power consumption, delay and power-delay products shall be compared among all the logics implemented. A 16 to 4 priority encoder is designed using all the logics proposed. The encoder output gives the binary equivalent of the input for which the data input is high. The following truth table signifies the functioning of an encoder.

B.CMOS LOGIC

The most commonly used logic these days is CMOS logic (Complementary metal oxide semiconductor) .In this logic both N-type and P-type are used. A signal is used to turn on a transistor and the same signal is used to turn off other transistor. Only simple switches are required for implementing this logic instead of pull up

Revised Manuscript Received on April 06, 2019.

Mr.Feroz Mohammad, Asst. Professor, ECE, Koneru Lakshmiah

Educational Foundation, AP, India.

B.Chandrasekhar, ECE, Koneru Lakshmiah Educational Foundation,

AP, India.

V.Devika Priya, ECE, Koneru Lakshmiah Educational Foundation,

A.P., India.

T.NavyaSree, ECE, Koneru Lakshmiah Educational Foundation, A.P.

India.

resistors .In CMOS logic collection of P-type transistors are placed in the form of pull up network between output and high voltage rail and collection of N-type transistors are placed in the form of pull down network between output and low voltage rail. If the gates of both P-type and N-type transistors are connected to the same input signal then P-type is ON and N-type is OFF and vice versa. To implement a 2:1 mux using CMOS logic it requires 12 gates [2, 3].

Figure 1: Schematic of multiplexer using CMOS logic C..TRANSMISSION GATE

[image:1.595.304.544.281.462.2]

The Transmission gate is a device which passes the signal from input to the output. It has two transistors named PMOS and NMOS. When the voltage at node A is logic 1 then logic 0 is given to Active low A. Allowing both the signals to pass from IN to OUT. In the same way when the voltage at the Active low A is logic 0 then the logic 1 is given to the node A turning both the transistors off[1].

Figure 2: Schematic of Multiplexer using Transmission Gate logic

D. PASS TRANSISTOR

Feroz Mohammad, B.Chandrasekhar, V.Devikapriya, T.NavyaSree

(2)

The number of transistors used to implement the logic can be reduced by using the pass transistors. The main advantage of pass transistor logic is in order to perform logic operation we require only one transistor [2,4]. When the S=0 the output is A and when S =1 the output is B.

Figure 3: Schematic of Multiplexer using Pass transistor logic

II.EXPERIMENTALRESULTS

[image:2.595.312.540.48.212.2]

In this paper different logics like CMOS logic, Pass Transistor logic and Transmission gate logic are used to design encoder in mentor graphics tool. Using 130nm technology and with supply voltage of 1.2v. Following figures shows schematics of multiplexers and encoders with different logics.

[image:2.595.53.287.111.324.2]

Figure 4: Schematic of CMOS encoder design on mentor graphics tool

Figure 5: Simulation of CMOS encoder in mentor graphics tool

And the output simulation results of CMOS are shown below for delay and power

Figure 6: Simulation result of CMOS Delay output

[image:2.595.307.546.283.674.2]

[image:2.595.52.287.480.673.2]
(3)

1412

Published By:

Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication

[image:3.595.308.544.50.222.2]

Retrieval Number: F392901048619/19©BEIESP

Figure 8: Simulation of CMOS encoder in mentor graphics tool

The schematic of transmission gate encoder design is shown below

[image:3.595.53.276.52.231.2]

[image:3.595.306.544.252.431.2]

Figure 9: Schematic of Transmission Gate Encoder in mentor graphics tool

Figure 10: Simulation of Transmission Gate final encoder on mentor graphics tool

And Transmission gate encoder simulation results of delay and power are shown below

[image:3.595.56.282.297.473.2]

Figure 11: Simulation result of Transmission gate encoder

Figure 12: Simulation result of transmission gate encoder delay

Figure 13: Simulation result of transmission gate encoder power on mentor graphics

[image:3.595.311.547.471.717.2] [image:3.595.57.282.515.691.2]
(4)
[image:4.595.307.537.69.226.2]

The Pass Transistor Encoder is designed and shown below

Figure 14: Schematic of Pass transistor Encoder on mentor graphics tool

Pass transistor simulation Encoder design is shown below

Figure 15: Simulation of Pass Transistor Encoder in mentor graphics tool

[image:4.595.53.285.90.321.2]

The output waves of Pass Transistor encoder design for delay and power are shown below

[image:4.595.310.543.246.412.2]

Figure 16: Simulation result of Pass Transistor Output

Figure 17: Simulation result of Pass transistor delay output

Figure 18: Simulation result of Pass transistor power output

III. DISCUSSIONOFRESULTS

Encoders are implemented using multiplexers with different MOS techniques like CMOS logic, Pass Transistor and Transmission gate logic and their delay and power dissipation is compared.

Table I: Simulation Results

LOGIC Max

Power

Average

Power Delay PDP

CMOS 1.5459mW 2.42uW 20.2ns 48.8

Pass

Transistor 1.82mW 5.74uW 19.97ns 114.6

Transmissio

n Gate 748.8uW 1.71uW 20.11ns 34.3

From the above table we can observe that the power dissipation is less in Transmission Gate logic when compared to other logics.

IV.CONCLUSIONANDFUTURESCOPE Above Logics are implemented in 130nm technology using mentor graphics tool with supply voltage of 1.2V. The power dissipation and the delay for the encoder using three different logics are compared and

[image:4.595.51.285.384.552.2] [image:4.595.304.550.535.637.2] [image:4.595.52.285.628.791.2]
(5)

1414

Published By:

Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering & Sciences Publication

Retrieval Number: F392901048619/19©BEIESP of comparator for low power applications.

REFERENCES

1. https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/4243

2. N. Ohkubo et al., A 4.4 ns CMOS 54x54-b multiplier using pass

transistor multiplexer, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, March 1995, 251–257.s

3. Anshul Jain , Abdul Hassan “Design of low power encoder using

different logics” International Journal of Science Technology and Management (vol.-4, issue-2)

4. Eugene D. Fabricius, Introduction to VLSI Design, (Tata McGraw-Hill

Figure

Figure 2: Schematic of Multiplexer using Transmission Gate logic
Figure 5: Simulation of CMOS encoder in mentor  graphics tool
Figure 10: Simulation  of Transmission Gate final encoder on mentor graphics tool
Figure 16: Simulation result of Pass Transistor Output

References

Related documents

Earth Planets Space, 53, 873?881, 2001 Further constraints for the Plio Pleistocene geomagnetic field strength New results from the Los Tuxtlas volcanic field (Mexico) Luis M Alva

Earth Planets Space, 58, 417?427, 2006 3 D electromagnetic induction studies using the Swarm constellation Mapping conductivity anomalies in the Earth?s mantle Alexei Kuvshinov1?,

Earth Planets Space, 60, 1169?1176, 2008 Rupture process of the 2007 Chuetsu oki, Niigata, Japan, earthquake ?Waveform inversion using empirical Green?s functions? Atsushi Nozu

The underlying cause of B12 deficiency, which can include intestinal tuberculosis and other treatable causes, should be determined and treated to obviate the patient's need for

To extend these findings and determine the feasibility and promise of a randomized clinical trial, we conducted a prospective study to measure the effects of adjunctive

asexuality rate ( ␦ ), variance of asexual ( C ) and sexual ( K ) reproductive contributions of individuals, correlation between asexual and sexual contributions ( ␳ ck), selfing rate

Mexico allows for dual citizenship, permits extraterritorial voting and has agencies to support emigrants (Escobar 2007; Figueroa-Aramoni 1999; Fitzgerald 2006), and thus, received

The differential diagnosis of PNETs includes neuroblast- oma, lymphoma, small-cell carcinoma, rhabdomyosar- coma, monophasic synovial sarcoma, and desmoplastic small round cell