R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Transformation technique, fixed point
theorem and positive solutions for
second-order impulsive differential equations
with deviating arguments
Xuemei Zhang
1*and Meiqiang Feng
2*Correspondence: [email protected] 1Department of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, Republic of China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
This paper investigates the boundary value problems of second-order impulsive differential equations with deviating arguments
⎧ ⎨ ⎩
x(t) +
ω
(t)f(t,x(α
(t))) = 0, t∈J,t=tk, x(t+k) –x(tk) =ckx(tk), k= 1, 2,. . .,n, ax(0) –bx(0) =ax(1) –bx(1) =01h(s)x(t)dt,
where{ck}is a real sequence withck> –1,k= 1, 2,. . .,n,
ω
may be singular att= 0 and/ort= 1. Several new and more general results are obtained for the existence of positive solutions for the above problem by using transformation technique and Krasnosel’skii’s fixed point theorem. We discuss our problems under two cases when the deviating arguments are delayed and advanced. The approach to deal with the impulsive term is different from earlier approaches. It is the first paper where the transformation technique and a fixed point theorem for cones are applied to second-order differential equations with impulsive effects and deviating arguments. An example is included to verify the theoretical results.Keywords: advanced and delayed arguments; impulsive differential equations; transformation technique; fixed point theorem; positive solutions
1 Introduction
Impulsive differential equations, which provide a natural description of observed evolu-tion processes, are regarded as important mathematical tools for better understanding of several real world problems in applied sciences, such as population dynamics, ecology, biological systems, biotechnology, industrial robotic, pharmacokinetics, optimal control,
etc.Therefore, the study of this class of impulsive differential equations has gained promi-nence and it is a rapidly growing field. For the general theory of impulsive differential equations, we refer the reader to [–], whereas the applications of impulsive differential equations can be found in [–]. Nieto and O’Regan [] pointed out that in a second-order differential equationu=f(t,u,u) one usually considers impulses in the position
uand the velocityu. However, in the motion of spacecraft one has to consider instanta-neous impulses depending on the position that result in jump discontinuities in velocity,
but with no change in position []. The impulses only on velocity occur also in impulsive mechanics [].
Some classical tools such as bifurcation theory [, ], fixed point theorems in cones [–], the method of lower and upper solutions [, ], the theory of critical point theory and variational methods [, , –] and the technique via appropriate trans-formation [–] have been widely used to study impulsive differential equations. But it is quite difficult to apply these approaches to an impulsive differential equation with de-viating arguments; therefore, there was no result in this area for a long time. Only in the recent eight years, there appeared a few articles which dealt with some impulsive differen-tial equations with deviating arguments by using fixed point theorems in cones [–]. Motivated by [–], in this article we shall use a different approach to discuss the ex-istence of positive solutions for a class of impulsive differential equations with deviating arguments.
Consider the second-order nonlinear impulsive differential equation of the type
⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩
x(t) +ω(t)f(t,x(α(t))) = , t∈J,t=tk,
x(t+
k) –x(tk) =ckx(tk), k= , , . . . ,n,
ax() –bx() =ax() –bx() =h(s)x(t)dt,
(.)
whereJ= [, ],f ∈C(J×R+,R+),R+= [, +∞),t
k(k= , , . . . ,n, herenis a fixed posi-tive integer) are fixed points with <t<t<· · ·<tk<· · ·<tn< ,a,b> ,{ck}is a real sequence withck> –,k= , , . . . ,n,x(t+k) (k= , , . . . ,n) represent the right-hand limit of
x(t) attk,h∈C[, ] is nonnegative.
Throughout this paper we assume thatα(t)≡tonJ= [, ]. In addition,ω,f,ck,αand
hsatisfy
(H) ω∈C((, ), [, +∞))with <
ω(s)ds<∞andωdoes not vanish on any
subinter-val of(, );
(H) f ∈C([, ]×[, +∞), [, +∞)),α∈C(J,J);
(H) {ck}is a real sequence withck> –,k= , , . . . ,n,c(t) :=
<tk<t( +ck); (H) h∈C[, ]is nonnegative withν∈[,a), where
ν=
h(t)c(t)dt. (.)
Remark . Throughout this paper, we always assume that a productc(t) :=<tk<t( +ck) equals unity if the number of factors is equal to zero, and let
cM=max
t∈J c(t), cm=mint∈J c(t), c
–(t) = <tk<t
( +ck)–.
Remark . Combining (H) and the definition ofc(t), we know thatc(t) is a step function
and bounded onJ, and
c(t) > , ∀t∈J, c(t) = , ∀t∈[,t].
point theories in cones, the authors proved the existence of positive solutions for problem (.).
At the same time, a class of boundary value problems with delay has been investigated; for example, see [–]. It is not difficult to see that the corresponding functionsf ap-pearing on the right-hand side depend onx(t–τ),τ> , where initial functionsxare given on the initial set, for example, [–τ, ]. Jankowski [, ] pointed out that in such cases
α(t) =t–τ, there are some problems with a constant delayτ. If we consider the differential problem on intervals [,k], wherek≤τ, then it means that we have no delays; we have such a situation in paper []. Ifk>τ, then it is easy to solve the differential equation on [,τ], since we have the solution on the initial set [–τ, ]. Continuing this process, we can find a solution on the whole interval [,k] by using the method of steps. In the present paper, for example, the deviating argument α can have a form α(t) =ρt=t– ( –ρ)t
with a fixed numberρ∈(, ), so the delay ( –ρ)tis a function oft. In this case, the initial set reduces to one pointt= , and we cannot apply the step method. To the au-thors’ knowledge, it is the first paper when positive solutions have been investigated for a class of second-order impulsive differential equations with deviating arguments both of advanced and delayed type.
Remark . There are almost no papers, except [–], studying second-order impul-sive differential equations with deviating arguments using fixed point theory. However, in [–], Jankowski only consideredω∈C([, ],∞), notωis singular att= and/or
t= , and dealt with the nonlinear term that is in the form off(y(t)), notf(t,c(t)y(t)); see (.).
Remark . Comparing with [–], we transform problem (.) into a differential sys-tem without impulse,i.e., the technique to deal with impulses is completely different from that of [–]. According to the authors’ knowledge, it is probably the first paper where this technique is applied to second-order impulsive boundary value problems with devi-ating arguments.
Remark . The technique to deal withf(t,c(t)y(t)) is completely different from that of Zhanget al.[], Zhanget al.[] and Sunet al.[].
Being directly inspired by [–], the authors will prove several new and more general results for the existence of positive solutions for problem (.) by using fixed point theories. The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section , we present some definitions and lemmas which are needed throughout this paper. In particular, we transform problem (.) into a differential system without impulse. In Section , we use a fixed point theorem to obtain the existence of positive solutions for problem (.) with advanced argumentα. Finally, in Section , we formulate sufficient conditions under which delayed problem (.) has positive solutions. In particular, our results in these sections are new whenα(t)≡ton
t∈J.
2 Preliminaries
Definition . (see []) LetEbe a real Banach space overR. A nonempty closed set
P⊂Eis said to be a cone provided that
(i) au+bv∈Pfor allu,v∈Pand alla≥,b≥, and (ii) u, –u∈Pimpliesu= .
Every coneP⊂Einduces an ordering inEgiven byx≤yif and only ify–x∈P. Definition . The mapβis said to be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on a conePof a real Banach spaceEprovided thatβ:P→[,∞) is continuous and
βtx+ ( –t)y≥tβ(x) + ( –t)β(y) for allx,y∈Pand ≤t≤.
Definition . A functionx(t) is said to be a solution of problem (.) onJif: (i) x(t)is absolutely continuous on each interval(,t]and(tk,tk+],k= , , . . . ,n;
(ii) for anyk= , , . . . ,n,x(tk+),x(t–
k)exist andx(tk–) =x(tk); (iii) x(t)satisfies (.).
We shall reduce problem (.) to a system without impulse. To this goal, firstly by means of the transformation
x(t) =c(t)y(t), (.)
we convert problem (.) into
⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩
–y(t) =ω(t)c–(t)f(t,c(α(t))y(α(t))), t∈J,
ay() –by() =h(s)c(s)y(s)ds,
ac()y() –bc()y() =h(s)c(s)y(s)ds.
(.)
The following lemmas will be used in the proof of our main results.
Lemma . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.Then
(i) Ify(t)is a solution of problem(.)onJ,thenx(t) =c(t)y(t)is a solution of problem
(.)onJ;
(ii) Ifx(t)is a solution of problem(.)onJ,theny(t) =c–(t)x(t)is a solution of problem
(.)onJ.
Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma . in []. Lemma . If(H)-(H)hold,then problem(.)has a solution y,and y can be expressed
in the form
y(t) =
H(t,s)c–(s)ft,cα(s)yα(s)ds, (.)
where
H(t,s) =G(t,s) +
a–ν
G(t,s) =
a(a+ b)
(b+at)(a( –s) +b), ≤t≤s≤,
(b+as)(a( –t) +b), ≤s≤t≤. (.)
Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma . in []. Lemma . Letξ∈(, ),G and H be given as in Lemma..Then we have the following results:
G(t,s)≤G(s,s), H(t,s)≤H(s,s) = a
a–νG(s,s), ∀t,s∈J, (.)
G(t,s)≥δG(s,s), H(t,s)≥δH(s,s) = δa
a–νG(s,s), ∀t∈[ξ, ],s∈J, (.)
where
δ= b
b+a.
Proof Relation (.) is simple to prove. Note that
G(t,s)
G(s,s)=
b+at b+as ≥
b+aξ
b+a fors≤t, G(t,s)
G(s,s)=
b+a( –t)
b+a( –s)≥
b
b+a fort≤s,
fort∈[ξ, ],s∈J.
Similarly, we can prove thatH(t,s)≥δH(s,s) fort∈[ξ, ],s∈J. Hence, it follows from
G(t,s)≥δG(s,s) that
H(t,s)≥δH(s,s) = δa
a–νG(s,s), ∀t∈[ξ, ],s∈J.
This gives the proof of Lemma ..
Remark . Noticing thata,b> , it follows from (.) and (.) that
<β≤G(t,s)≤β, ∀t,s∈J, (.)
and
<β∗≤H(t,s)≤β, ∀t,s∈J, (.)
where
β=
b
a(a+ b), β=
a+ b
a , β
∗= b
a(a+ b)(a–ν), β=
a+ b
(a–ν). (.) LetE=C[, ]. ThenEis a real Banach space with the norm · defined by
y=max
t∈J
Define a coneKinEby
K=
y∈E:y(t)≥,min
t∈[ξ,]y(t)≥δy
. (.)
Also, define forra positive numberrby
r=
y∈E:y<r.
Note that∂r={y∈E:y=r}. DefineT:K→Kby
(Ty)(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds. (.)
Lemma . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.Then T(K)⊂K and T:K→K is completely
continuous.
Proof Fory∈K, it follows from (.) and (.) that
(Ty)(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≤
H(s,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds, t∈J. (.)
It follows from (.), (.) and (.) that
min
t∈[ξ,](Ty)(t) =tmin∈[ξ,]
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥δ
H(s,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥δTy.
Thus,T(K)⊂K.
Next, by arguments similar to those of Theorem in [], one can prove thatT:K→K
is completely continuous. So it is omitted, and the lemma is proved.
Remark . From (.), we know thaty∈Eis a solution of problem (.) if and only ify
is a fixed point of the operatorT.
From Lemma . and Remark ., we can obtain the following results.
Lemma . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.Then
(i) Ifx(t)is a solution of problem(.)onJ,theny(t) =c–(t)x(t)is a fixed point ofT;
In the rest of this section, we state a well-known fixed point theorem which we need later.
Lemma .(see []) Let P be a cone in a real Banach space E.Assume that,are
bounded open sets in E with∈,¯⊂.If
A:P∩(¯\)→P
is completely continuous such that either
(i) Ax ≤ x,∀x∈P∩∂andAx ≥ x,∀x∈P∩∂,or
(ii) Ax ≥ x,∀x∈P∩∂andAx ≤ x,∀x∈P∩∂,
then A has at least one fixed point in P∩(¯\).
3 Existence of positive solutions for problem (1.1) under
α
(t)≥tonJ For convenience, we introduce the following notations:f=lim sup
y→ max
t∈J
f(t,y)
y , f=lim infy→ mint∈J
f(t,y)
y , f∞=lim sup
y→∞
max
t∈J
f(t,y)
y , f∞=lim infy→∞ mint∈J
f(t,y)
y .
We also define as []i= number of zeros in the set{f,f∞}andi∞= number of
infini-ties in the set{f,f∞}. Sun and Li [] pointed out thati,i∞= , or , and there are six
possible cases: (i)i= andi∞= ; (ii)i= andi∞= ; (iii)i= andi∞= ; (iv)i=
andi∞= ; (v)i= andi∞= ; and (vi)i= andi∞= . By using Krasnosel’skii’s fixed
point theorem in a cone, some results are obtained for the existence of at least one or two positive solutions of problem (.) forα(t)≥tonJunder the above six possible cases. 3.1 For the case
α
(t)≥tonJunderi0= 1 andi∞= 1In this subsection, we discuss the existence of a single positive solution for problem (.) forα(t)≥tonJunderi= andi∞= .
For convenience, we introduce the following notations:
γ =
ω(s)ds, γ=
ξ
ω(s)ds.
Theorem . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.If i= and i∞= ,then problem(.)has at
least one positive solution.
Proof First, we consider the casef= andf
∞=∞. Sincef= , then there existsr>
such that
f(t,y)≤ cm
βγcM
y (∀t∈J, ≤y≤r).
Since ≤t≤α(t)≤ onJ, it follows from ≤y(t)≤ronJthat
which implies
Ty ≥ y, ∀y∈K∩∂R. (.)
Thus by (i) of Lemma ., it follows thatThas a fixed pointyinK∩(¯R\r) with
r≤ y ≤R.
Lemma . implies that problem (.) has at least one positive solutionxwith
cmr≤ x ≤cMR.
This gives the proof of Theorem ..
Remark . Fori= andi∞= , there is another casef∞= andf=∞. However, at
the moment, we give no information on the existence of a positive solution for problem (.) if we changef= andf∞=∞intof∞= andf=∞in Theorem ..
3.2 For the case
α
(t)≥tonJunderi0= 0 andi∞= 0In this subsection, we discuss the existence for the positive solutions of problem (.) under
i= andi∞= . For convenience, we introduce the following notations:
fρ=max
max
t∈J
f(t,y)
ρ :y∈[,ρ]
and
l= cm
βγ, L=
cM
cmβ∗δγ
.
Now, we shall state and prove the following main result.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold andα(t)≥t on J.In addition,let the following
two conditions hold:
(H) There existl> andρ> such thatfρ≤l;
(H) There existη> andρ> such thatf(t,y)≥ηfort∈J,y≥ρ;furthermore,ρ=ρ.
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
Proof Without loss of generality, we may assume thatρ<ρ. Consideringf ρ
≤l, we have
f(t,y)≤lρfor ≤y≤ρ,t∈J.
Since ≤t≤α(t)≤ onJ, it follows from ≤y(t)≤ρonJthat
≤yα(t)≤ρ.
Letρ=min{ρ,cM ρ}. Then, fory∈K∩∂ρ, we have ≤y(t)≤ρ≤ρfort∈J, and
then
Consequently, for anyt∈Jandy∈K∩∂ρ, (.) and (.) imply
(Ty)(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≤βc–mlρ
ω(s)ds
=βc–mlργ
=ρ,
which implies
Ty ≤ y, ∀y∈K∩∂ρ. (.)
On the other hand, from (H), whenρis fixed, there existsη> such that
f(t,y)≥η≥max
ρ, ρ δcm
× cM
β∗γ
fort∈Jandy≥ρ. Since ≤t≤α(t)≤ onJ, it follows fromy(t)≥ρonJthat
yα(t)≥ρ.
Letρ¯=max{ρ,δρcm }. Then, fory∈K∩∂ρ¯, we have
c(t)y(t)≥cmy(t)≥cmδy ≥ρ, t∈[ξ, ].
Hence, fory∈K∩∂ρ¯, it follows from (.) and (.) that
(Ty)(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥β∗
ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥β∗c–M
ξ
ω(s)ηds
≥β∗c–Mη
ξ ω(s)ds
=β∗c–Mηγ
≥β∗c–Mγρ¯
cM
β∗γ
=ρ¯,
which implies
Thus by (i) of Lemma ., it follows thatThas a fixed pointyinK∩(¯ρ\ρ) with
ρ≤ y ≤ ¯ρ.
Thus, it follows from Lemma . that problem (.) has at least one positive solutionx
with
cmρ≤ x ≤cMρ¯.
This finishes the proof of Theorem ..
We remark that condition (H) in Theorem . can be replaced by the following
condi-tion:
(H) f≤l,
which is a special case of (H).
Corollary . Suppose that(H)-(H), (H), (H)hold andα(t)≥t on J.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
Proof We show that (H)implies (H). Suppose that (H)holds. Then there exists a
pos-itive numberρ=ρsuch that
f(t,y)
y ≤l, t∈J, <y≤ρ.
Hence, we obtain
f(t,y)≤ly≤lρ, t∈J, <y≤ρ.
Therefore, (H) holds. Hence, by Theorem ., problem (.) has at least one positive
solution.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold andα(t)≥t on J.In addition,let the following
condition hold: (H) f∞≥L.
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
Proof The proof is similar to those of (.) and (.), respectively. Corollary . Suppose that(H)-(H), (H), (H)hold andα(t)≥t on J.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
3.3 For the case
α
(t)≥tonJunderi0= 1 andi∞= 0 ori0= 0 andi∞= 1Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold,α(t)≥t on J and f∈[,l)and f∞∈(L,∞).
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
Proof The proof is similar to that of Theorem .. Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold,α(t)≥t on J and f∈(L,∞)and f∞∈[,l).
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
Proof Considerf∈(L,∞), then there existsρ> such thatf(t,y) >Lyfor ≤y≤ρ,
t∈J.
Since ≤t≤α(t)≤ onJ, it follows from ≤y(t)≤ρonJthat
≤yα(t)≤ρ.
Letρ=min{ρ,cM ρ}. Then, fory∈K∩∂ρ, we have ≤y(t)≤ρ≤ρfort∈J, and
then
cα(t)yα(t)≤cMy=cMρ≤ρ, t∈J.
Consequently, fory∈K∩∂ρ, it follows from (.) and (.) that
(Ty)(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥β∗
ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥β∗c–M
ξ
ω(s)Lcα(s)yα(s)ds
≥β∗c–MLcmδy
ξ ω(s)ds
=β∗c–MLcmδyγ
≥ y,
which implies
Ty ≥ y, ∀y∈K∩∂ρ. (.)
Next, turn tof∞∈[,l). In fact, we can show thatf∞∈[,l) implies (H).
Letτ∈(f∞,l). Then there existsr>τ such thatmaxt∈Jf(t,y)≤τyfory∈[r,∞). Let
β=maxmax
t∈J f(t,y) : ≤y≤r
and ρ∗>max
β
l–τ,ρ,cMρ
.
Then we have
max
≤t≤f(t,y)≤τy+β≤τρ ∗
+β<lρ∗, ∀y∈
,ρ∗.
This implies thatfρ∗
Similarly to the proof of (.), we have
Ty ≤ y, ∀y∈K∩∂ρ∗, (.)
whereρ∗=min{ρ∗,cM ρ∗}.
Thus by (ii) of Lemma ., it follows thatThas a fixed pointyinK∩(¯ρ∗\ρ) with
ρ≤ y ≤ρ∗.
This finishes the proof of Theorem ..
From Theorems . and ., we have the following result.
Corollary . Suppose that f= and condition(H
)in Theorem.hold.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H),α(t)≥t on J,f∈(,l)and f∞=∞.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
Proof The proof is similar to that of Theorem .. Theorem . Suppose(H)-(H),α(t)≥t on J,f=∞and f∞∈(,l).Then problem(.)
has at least one positive solution.
Proof The proof is similar to that of Theorem .. From Theorems . and ., the following corollaries are easily obtained.
Corollary . Suppose that f=∞and condition(H
)in Theorem.hold.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
Corollary . Suppose that f∞=∞and condition(H)in Theorem.hold.Then
prob-lem(.)has at least one positive solution.
3.4 For the case
α
(t)≥tonJunderi0= 0 andi∞= 2 ori0= 2 andi∞= 0In this subsection we study the existence of multiple positive solutions for problem (.) for the caseα(t)≥tonJunderi= andi∞= ori= andi∞= .
Combining the proofs of Theorems . and ., the following theorem is easily proved.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H),α(t)≥t on J,i= and i∞= and condition(H)
of Theorem.hold.Then problem(.)has at least two positive solutions.
Corollary . Suppose that(H)-(H),α(t)≥t on J,i= and i∞= and condition(H)
of Corollary.hold.Then problem(.)has at least two positive solutions.
4 Positive solutions of problem (1.1) for the case of
α
(t)≤tonJNow we deal with problem (.) for the case ofα(t)≤tonJ. Similarly as in Lemmas . and ., we can prove the following results.
Lemma . Letξ∈(, ),G and H be given as in Lemma..Then we have the following results:
G(t,s)≥δG(s,s), H(t,s)≥δH(s,s) = δa
a–νG(s,s), ∀t∈[,ξ],s∈J, (.)
where
δ= b
b+a. Proof Note that
G(t,s)
G(s,s)=
b+at b+as ≥
b
b+a fors≤t, G(t,s)
G(s,s)=
b+a( –t)
b+a( –s)≥
b+a( –ξ)
b+a fort≤s,
fort∈[,ξ],s∈J.
Similarly, we can prove thatH(t,s)≥δH(s,s) fort∈[,ξ],s∈J. Hence, it follows from
G(t,s)≥δG(s,s) that
H(t,s)≥δH(s,s) = δa
a–νG(s,s), ∀t∈[,ξ],s∈J.
This gives the proof of Lemma ..
LetEbe as defined in Section . We define a coneK∗inEby
K∗=
u∈E:u≥, min
t∈[,ξ]u(t)≥δu
.
It is easy to see thatK∗is a closed convex cone ofE. DefineT∗:K∗→Eby
T∗y(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds. (.)
It is clear thaty(t) is a positive solution of problem (.) if and only ofyis a fixed point ofT∗.
By analogous methods, we have the following results. Here we only give the proof of Lemma ..
Lemma . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.Then T∗(K∗)⊂K∗and T∗:K∗→K∗ is
com-pletely continuous.
Lemma . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.Then
(i) Ifx(t)is a solution of problem(.)onJ,theny(t) =c–(t)x(t)is a fixed point ofT∗;
Similar to the proof of that in Section , we have the following results.
4.1 For the case
α
(t)≤tonJunderi0= 1 andi∞= 1For convenience, we introduce the following notation:
γ∗=
ξ
ω(s)ds.
Theorem . Assume that(H)-(H)hold.If i= and i∞= ,then problem(.)has at
least one positive solution.
Proof First, we consider the casef= andf
∞=∞. Sincef= , then there existsr>
such that
f(t,y)≤ cm
βγcM
y (∀t∈J, ≤y≤r).
Since ≤α(t)≤t≤ onJ, it follows from ≤y(t)≤ronJthat
≤yα(t)≤r fort∈J.
Letr=min{r,cM r}. Then, fory∈K∗∩∂r, we have ≤y(t)≤r≤rfort∈J, and then
cα(t)yα(t)≤cMy=cMr≤r, t∈J.
Consequently, for anyt∈Jandy∈K∗∩∂r, (.) and (.) imply
T∗y(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≤βc–
m
ω(s) cm
γ βcM
cα(s)yα(s)ds
≤βc–m cm
γ βcM
cM
ω(s)yα(s)ds
≤
γ
ω(s)dsy
=y,
which implies
T∗y≤ y, ∀y∈K∗∩∂r. (.)
Next we considerf∞=∞, there existsrˆsatisfying <r<rˆsuch that
f(t,y)≥ cM
cmδαγ
y, ∀t∈[,ξ],y≥ ˆr.
Sinceα(t)≤t≤ξonJ, it follows fromy(t)≥ ˆron [,ξ] that
LetR>max{ˆr,δcmrˆ }. Then, fory∈K∗∩∂R, we have
cα(t)yα(t)≥cmy
α(t)≥cmδy ≥ ˆr, t∈[,ξ].
Hence, fory∈K∗∩∂R, it follows from (.) and (.) that
T∗y(t) =
H(t,s)ω(s)c–(s)fs,cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥αc–M
ξ
ω(s) cM
cmδαγ
cα(s)yα(s)ds
≥αc–M cM cmδαγ
cm
ξ
ω(s)yα(s)ds
≥
δγ∗ ξ
ω(s)dsδy
=y,
which implies
T∗y≥ y, ∀y∈K∗∩∂R. (.)
Thus by (i) of Lemma ., it follows thatT∗has a fixed pointyinK∗∩(¯R\r) with
r≤y(t)≤R.
This finishes the proof of Theorem ..
Remark . Fori= andi∞= , there is another casef∞= andf=∞. However, at
the moment, we give no information on the existence of a positive solution for problem (.) if we changef= andf
∞=∞intof∞= andf=∞in Theorem ..
4.2 For the case
α
(t)≤tonJunderi0= 0 andi∞= 0In this subsection, we discuss the existence for the positive solutions of problem (.) under
i= andi∞= . For convenience, we introduce the following notation:
L∗= cM
cmαδγ∗
.
Now, we shall state and prove the following main result.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold andα(t)≤t on J.In addition,let the following
condition hold:
(H∗) There exist η∗ > and ρ> such thatf(t,y)≥η∗ for t∈J, y≥ρ;furthermore, ρ=ρ.
Corollary . Suppose that(H)-(H), (H), (H∗)hold andα(t)≤t on J.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold andα(t)≤t on J.In addition,let the following
condition hold: (H∗) f∞≥L∗.
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
Corollary . Suppose that(H)-(H), (H), (H∗)hold andα(t)≥t on J.Then problem
(.)has at least one positive solution.
4.3 For the case
α
(t)≤tonJunderi0= 1 andi∞= 0 ori0= 0 andi∞= 1Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold,α(t)≤t on J and f∈[,l)and f∞∈(L∗,∞).
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H)hold,α(t)≤t on J and f∈(L∗,∞)and f∞∈[,l).
Then problem(.)has at least one positive solution.
4.4 For the case
α
(t)≤tonJunderi0= 0 andi∞= 2 ori0= 2 andi∞= 0Combining the proofs of Theorems . and ., the following theorem is easily proved.
Theorem . Suppose that(H)-(H),α(t)≤t on J,i= and i∞= and condition(H)
of Theorem.hold.Then problem(.)has at least two positive solutions.
Corollary . Suppose that(H)-(H),α(t)≤t on J,i= and i∞= and condition(H)
of Corollary.hold.Then problem(.)has at least two positive solutions.
5 An example
To illustrate how our main results can be used in practice, we present an example.
Example . Consider the following boundary value problem:
⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩
x(t) +ω(t)f(t,x(α(t))) = , t∈J,t=,
x(+) –x() = x(), k= ,
x() –x() = x() –x() =x(t)dt,
(.)
whereα∈C(J,J),α(t)≥tonJand
ω(t) = √
t, f(t,x) =
n √
+tnxn,
heren≥ is a positive integral number.
This means that problem (.) involves the advanced argumentα. For example, we can takeα(t) =√
Problem (.) can be regarded as a problem of the form (.), wherea= ,b= ,h(t)≡,
Hence, by Theorem ., the conclusion follows, and the proof is complete.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
XZ completed the main study and carried out the results of this article. MF checked the proofs and verified the calculation. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, Republic of China. 2School of Applied Science, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing, 100192, Republic of China.
Acknowledgements
This work is sponsored by the project NSFC (11301178, 11171032), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2014ZZD10, 2014MS58) and the improving project of graduate education of Beijing Information Science and Technology University (YJT201416). The authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions, which has greatly improved this paper.
Received: 13 November 2014 Accepted: 25 November 2014 Published:08 Dec 2014 References
1. Lakshmikantham, V, Bainov, D, Simeonov, P: Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore (1989)
2. Samoilenko, A, Perestyuk, N: Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore (1995)
3. Benchohra, M, Henderson, J, Ntouyas, S: Impulsive Differential Equations and Inclusions. Hindawi, New York (2006) 4. Ding, W, Han, M: Periodic boundary value problem for the second order impulsive functional differential equations.
Appl. Math. Comput.155, 709-726 (2004)
5. Agarwal, RP, O’Regan, D: Multiple nonnegative solutions for second order impulsive differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.114, 51-59 (2000)
6. Nieto, JJ, López, R: Boundary value problems for a class of impulsive functional equations. Comput. Math. Appl.55, 2715-2731 (2008)
7. Feng, M, Du, B, Ge, W: Impulsive boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions and one-dimensional
p-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. TMA70, 3119-3126 (2009)
8. Li, J, Nieo, JJ: Existence of positive solutions for multipoint boundary value problem on the half-line with impulses. Bound. Value Probl.2009, 834158 (2009)
9. Guo, D: Multiple positive solutions of impulsive nonlinear Fredholm integral equations and applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl.173, 318-324 (1993)
11. Lin, X, Jiang, D: Multiple positive solutions of Dirichlet boundary value problems for second order impulsive differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.321, 501-514 (2006)
12. Shen, J, Wang, W: Impulsive boundary value problems with nonlinear boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. TMA69, 4055-4062 (2008)
13. Wei, Z: Periodic boundary value problems for second order impulsive integro-differential equations of mixed type in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl.195, 214-229 (1995)
14. Hristova, S, Bainov, D: Monotone-iterative techniques of V. Lakshmikantham for a boundary value problem for systems of impulsive differential-difference equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.197, 1-13 (1996)
15. Nieto, JJ, O’Regan, D: Variational approach to impulsive differential equations. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl.10, 680-690 (2009)
16. Liu, X, Willms, A: Impulsive controllability of linear dynamical systems with applications to maneuvers of spacecraft. Math. Probl. Eng.2, 277-299 (1996)
17. Pasquero, S: Ideality criterion for unilateral constraints in time-dependent impulsive mechanics. J. Math. Phys.46, 112904 (2005)
18. Liu, Y, O’Regan, D: Multiplicity results using bifurcation techniques for a class of boundary value problems of impulsive differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.16, 1769-1775 (2011)
19. Ma, R, Yang, B, Wang, Z: Positive periodic solutions of first-order delay differential equations with impulses. Appl. Math. Comput.219, 6074-6083 (2013)
20. Hao, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: Positive solutions fornth-order singular nonlocal boundary value problems. Bound. Value Probl. 2007, 74517 (2007)
21. Liu, L, Liu, Z, Wu, Y: Infinite boundary value problems fornth-order nonlinear impulsive integro-differential equations in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. TMA67, 2670-2679 (2007)
22. Feng, M: Positive solutions for a second-orderp-Laplacian boundary value problem with impulsive effects and two parameters. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/534787
23. Zhang, X, Feng, M, Ge, W: Existence of solutions of boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions for second-order impulsive integro-differential equations in Banach spaces. J. Comput. Appl. Math.233, 1915-1926 (2010)
24. Yan, J: Existence of positive periodic solutions of impulsive functional differential equations with two parameters. J. Math. Anal. Appl.327, 854-868 (2007)
25. Liu, X, Guo, D: Method of upper and lower solutions for second-order impulsive integro-differential equations in a Banach space. Comput. Math. Appl.38, 213-223 (1999)
26. Guo, D: Extremal solutions fornth-order impulsive integro-differential equations on the half-line in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. TMA65, 677-696 (2006)
27. Zhou, J, Li, Y: Existence and multiplicity of solutions for some Dirichlet problems with impulsive effects. Nonlinear Anal. TMA71, 2856-2865 (2009)
28. Xiao, J, Nieto, JJ, Luo, Z: Multiplicity of solutions for nonlinear second order impulsive differential equations with linear derivative dependence via variational methods. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.17, 426-432 (2012) 29. Tian, Y, Ge, W: Applications of variational methods to boundary value problem for impulsive differential equations.
Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc.51, 509-527 (2008)
30. Tian, Y, Ge, W: Variational methods to Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem for impulsive differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA72, 277-287 (2010)
31. Zhang, X, Yang, X, Ge, W: Positive solutions ofnth-order impulsive boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. TMA71, 5930-5945 (2009)
32. Zhang, X, Yan, J, Zhao, A: Existence of positive periodic solutions for an impulsive differential equation. Nonlinear Anal. TMA68, 3209-3216 (2008)
33. Sun, X, Huo, H, Ma, C: Periodic solutions of a class of impulsive neutral delay differential equation. Appl. Math. Comput.219, 3947-3955 (2012)
34. Zhang, X, Feng, M: Transformation techniques and fixed point theories to establish the positive solutions of second order impulsive differential equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math.271, 117-129 (2014)
35. Jankowski, T: Positive solutions of three-point boundary value problems for second order impulsive differential equations with advanced arguments. Appl. Math. Comput.197, 179-189 (2008)
36. Jankowski, T: Three positive solutions to second order three-point impulsive differential equations with deviating arguments. Int. J. Comput. Math.87, 215-225 (2010)
37. Jankowski, T: Existence of positive solutions to second order four-point impulsive differential problems with deviating arguments. Comput. Math. Appl.58, 805-817 (2009)
38. Jankowski, T: Positive solutions to third-order impulsive Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems with deviating arguments and one-dimensionalp-Laplacian. Dyn. Syst. Appl.20, 575-586 (2011)
39. Zhang, X, Feng, M: Green’s function and positive solutions for a second-order singular boundary value problem with integral boundary conditions and a delayed argument. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/393187 40. Bai, D, Xu, Y: Positive solutions of second-order two-delay differential systems with twin parameter. Nonlinear Anal.
TMA63, 601-617 (2005)
41. Du, B, Hu, X, Ge, W: Positive solutions to a type of multi-point boundary value problem with delay and one-dimensionalp-Laplacian. Appl. Math. Comput.208, 501-510 (2009)
42. Jiang, D: Multiple positive solutions for boundary value problems of second order delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett.15, 575-583 (2002)
43. Wang, W, Sheng, J: Positive solutions to a multi-point boundary value problem with delay. Appl. Math. Comput.188, 96-102 (2007)
44. Wang, Y, Zhao, W, Ge, W: Multiple positive solutions for boundary value problems of second order delay differential equations with one-dimensionalp-Laplacian. J. Math. Anal. Appl.326, 641-654 (2007)
45. Jankowski, T: Positive solutions for fourth-order differential equations with deviating arguments and integral boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. TMA73, 1289-1299 (2010)
47. Guo, D, Lakshmikantham, V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones. Academic Press, New York (1988)
48. Feng, M: Existence of symmetric positive solutions for a boundary value problem with integral boundary conditions. Appl. Math. Lett.24, 1419-1427 (2011)
49. Zhao, A, Yan, W, Yan, J: Existence of positive periodic solution for an impulsive delay differential equation. In: Topological Methods, Variational Methods and Their Applications, pp. 269-274. World Scientific, London (2002) 50. Wang, H: Positive periodic solutions of functional differential equations. J. Differ. Equ.202, 354-366 (2004) 51. Sun, H, Li, W: Existence theory for positive solutions to one-dimensionalp-Laplacian boundary value problems on
time scales. J. Differ. Equ.240, 217-248 (2007)
10.1186/1687-1847-2014-312
Cite this article as:Zhang and Feng:Transformation technique, fixed point theorem and positive solutions for