• No results found

2 Hydr­­oxy N (2 pyrid­yl)benzamide

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "2 Hydr­­oxy N (2 pyrid­yl)benzamide"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o1772

Wanget al. C

12H10N2O2 doi:10.1107/S1600536806012244 Acta Cryst.(2006). E62, o1772–o1773 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

2-Hydroxy-

N

-(2-pyridyl)benzamide

Wen-Hua Wang,aZhong-Lu You,aWei-Sheng Liua* and Da-Qi Wangb

aCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

and State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People’s Republic of China, and

bDepartment of Chemistry, Liaocheng

University, Liaocheng, 252000, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: liuws@lzu.edu.cn

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 298 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.007 A˚

Rfactor = 0.046

wRfactor = 0.135 Data-to-parameter ratio = 7.4

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

Received 22 March 2006 Accepted 4 April 2006

#2006 International Union of Crystallography

All rights reserved

The molecule of the title compound, C12H10N2O2, is nearly planar, with a dihedral angle of 3.7 (2)between the planes of

the benzene and pyridine rings. Molecules are linked by intermolecular O—H N and C—H O hydrogen bonds, as well as possible C—H interactions, forming a two-dimensional zigzag hydrogen-bonded network.

Comment

Molecular self-assembly by hydrogen bonds, e.g. C—H O, N—H O and C—H interactions, has emerged as an attractive approach in crystal engineering (Lu¨et al., 2005). The study of antimycobacterial properties of salicylanilides is of great interest, as salicylanilides can inhibit bacterial two-component systems, which can also be important in myco-bacteria. Salicylanilide and its derivatives exhibit biological and pharmacological activities (Waisseret al., 2004). The title compound, (I), was synthesized as a route to synthetic inter-mediates. We present here its crystal structure.

[image:1.610.207.460.580.714.2]

In the molecule of the title compound, (I), bond lengths and angles (Table 1) are in normal ranges (Allenet al., 1987). The strong intramolecular N—H O hydrogen bond (Table 2) causes the formation of a pseudo-six-membered ring (C1–C3/ O2/H1/N1) (Fig. 1). The dihedral angle between the two planar rings [A(atoms C2–C7) andB(N2/C8–C12)] is 3.7 (2).

Figure 1

(2)

The crystal structure of (I) is stabilized by intermolecular O—H N and C—H O hydrogen bonds (Table 2), as well as possible T-shaped C—H interactions with a distance of 2.88 A˚ between the centroid of ring B and atom H6(C6) at (3

2 x, y, z 1

2), which result in the formation of a two-dimensional zigzag hydrogen-bonded network (Fig. 2).

Experimental

A mixture of pyridin-2-amine (0.94 g, 10.0 mmol) and 2-(methoxy-carbonyl)phenol (1.52 g, 10.0 mmol) was melted at 463–483 K for 2 h with an air condenser under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then heated under reflux in ethanol (10 ml) for 10 min, filtered and the product crystallized from the same solvent (yield 1.16 g, 54%; m.p. 484–485 K).

Crystal data

C12H10N2O2 Mr= 214.22

Orthorhombic,P212121 a= 6.1216 (16) A˚

b= 12.535 (3) A˚

c= 13.321 (4) A˚

V= 1022.2 (5) A˚3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.392 Mg m 3

MoKradiation = 0.10 mm1 T= 298 (2) K Needle, colourless 0.480.190.17 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

’and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin= 0.955,Tmax= 0.984

5265 measured reflections 1074 independent reflections 671 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.106

max= 25.0

Refinement

Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.046 wR(F2) = 0.135 S= 1.03 1074 reflections 145 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.062P)2

+ 0.1271P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001 max= 0.18 e A˚

3

[image:2.610.46.297.71.200.2]

min=0.17 e A˚ 3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).

N1—C1 1.353 (5) N1—C8 1.382 (5) N2—C12 1.340 (6)

N2—C8 1.342 (5) O1—C1 1.217 (5) O2—C3 1.358 (5)

C1—N1—C8 128.4 (4) C12—N2—C8 118.1 (4) O1—C1—N1 122.5 (5) O1—C1—C2 121.0 (4) N1—C1—C2 116.4 (4) O2—C3—C4 121.5 (4)

O2—C3—C2 118.5 (4) N2—C8—C9 121.5 (4) N2—C8—N1 113.4 (4) C9—C8—N1 125.2 (4) N2—C12—C11 123.5 (5)

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

N1—H1 O2 0.86 1.90 2.627 (5) 142 O2—H2 N2i

0.82 1.88 2.676 (5) 164 C5—H5 O1ii 0.93 2.50 3.384 (6) 159

Symmetry codes: (i)x1 2;yþ

1

2;zþ1; (ii)xþ1;yþ 1 2;zþ

1 2.

H atoms were positioned geometrically, with O—H = 0.82 A˚ , N— H = 0.86 A˚ and C—H = 0.93 A˚, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = xUeq(C,N,O), with x = 1.5 for the

hydroxyl H atom andx= 1.2 for all other H atoms. In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, Friedel pairs were averaged. Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 2000); cell refinement:SMART; data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure:

SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure:

SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND

(Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publi-cation:SHELXTL(Bruker, 2000).

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 20371022, 20431010 and 20021001), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Programme of Higher Education, and the Key Project of the Ministry of Education of China (grant No. 01170).

References

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.

Brandenburg, K. (2005).DIAMOND. Release 3.1a. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.

Bruker (2000). SMART (Version 5.0), SAINT-Plus (Version 6) and

SHELXTL(Version 6.1). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Lu¨, X.-Q., Jiang, J.-J., zur Loye, H.-C., Kang, B.-S. & Su, C.-Y. (2005).Inorg.

Chem.44, 1810–1817.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of

Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Waisser, K., Drazˇkova´, K., Kunesˇ, J., Klimesˇova´, V. & Kaustova´, J. (2004).Il Farmaco,59, 615–625.

Figure 2

(3)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1772–o1773

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1772–o1773 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536806012244]

2-Hydroxy-

N

-(2-pyridyl)benzamide

Wen-Hua Wang, Zhong-Lu You, Wei-Sheng Liu and Da-Qi Wang

2-Hydroxy-N-(2-pyridyl)benzamide

Crystal data C12H10N2O2

Mr = 214.22

Orthorhombic, P212121

Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab a = 6.1216 (16) Å b = 12.535 (3) Å c = 13.321 (4) Å V = 1022.2 (5) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 448 Dx = 1.392 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 903 reflections θ = 2.2–20.5°

µ = 0.10 mm−1

T = 298 K Needle, colorless 0.48 × 0.19 × 0.17 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) Tmin = 0.955, Tmax = 0.984

5265 measured reflections 1074 independent reflections 671 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.106

θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2°

h = −7→7 k = −14→14 l = −15→10

Refinement Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046

wR(F2) = 0.135

S = 1.04 1074 reflections 145 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.062P)2 + 0.1271P]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001

Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3

Absolute structure: Flack (1983), no Friedel pairs

Absolute structure parameter: 10 (10)

Special details

(4)

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

N1 1.0593 (6) 0.0508 (3) 0.4239 (3) 0.0423 (10) H1 1.0406 0.1143 0.4469 0.051* N2 1.3572 (6) 0.0537 (3) 0.5262 (3) 0.0427 (9) O1 0.9183 (6) −0.0704 (2) 0.3171 (3) 0.0644 (10) O2 0.8700 (6) 0.2389 (2) 0.4265 (3) 0.0637 (11) H2 0.8406 0.3009 0.4409 0.096* C1 0.9106 (8) 0.0175 (3) 0.3557 (3) 0.0420 (11) C2 0.7368 (7) 0.0945 (3) 0.3287 (3) 0.0399 (10) C3 0.7180 (7) 0.2007 (3) 0.3616 (3) 0.0421 (12) C4 0.5473 (8) 0.2626 (4) 0.3291 (4) 0.0561 (13) H4 0.5381 0.3331 0.3507 0.067* C5 0.3906 (9) 0.2239 (4) 0.2660 (4) 0.0587 (14) H5 0.2760 0.2673 0.2452 0.070* C6 0.4039 (8) 0.1197 (4) 0.2334 (4) 0.0564 (14) H6 0.2988 0.0920 0.1903 0.068* C7 0.5746 (7) 0.0575 (4) 0.2656 (3) 0.0474 (12) H7 0.5814 −0.0129 0.2438 0.057* C8 1.2375 (7) −0.0039 (3) 0.4615 (3) 0.0383 (11) C9 1.2951 (8) −0.1068 (3) 0.4358 (4) 0.0497 (13) H9 1.2126 −0.1457 0.3901 0.060* C10 1.4762 (9) −0.1499 (4) 0.4795 (4) 0.0581 (14) H10 1.5171 −0.2193 0.4636 0.070* C11 1.5982 (9) −0.0928 (4) 0.5460 (4) 0.0593 (14) H11 1.7222 −0.1219 0.5756 0.071* C12 1.5330 (8) 0.0076 (4) 0.5676 (4) 0.0508 (13) H12 1.6143 0.0467 0.6137 0.061*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(5)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1772–o1773

C7 0.053 (3) 0.047 (3) 0.042 (3) −0.005 (3) 0.000 (3) −0.006 (2) C8 0.043 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.040 (2) −0.004 (2) 0.007 (2) 0.001 (2) C9 0.060 (3) 0.033 (3) 0.057 (3) 0.004 (2) −0.006 (3) −0.009 (2) C10 0.070 (3) 0.038 (3) 0.066 (3) 0.007 (3) −0.001 (3) −0.007 (3) C11 0.066 (3) 0.052 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.010 (3) 0.000 (3) −0.008 (3) C12 0.052 (3) 0.051 (3) 0.049 (3) 0.000 (3) −0.003 (3) −0.005 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C1 1.353 (5) C5—C6 1.378 (6) N1—C8 1.382 (5) C5—H5 0.9300 N1—H1 0.8600 C6—C7 1.372 (6) N2—C12 1.340 (6) C6—H6 0.9300 N2—C8 1.342 (5) C7—H7 0.9300 O1—C1 1.217 (5) C8—C9 1.381 (6) O2—C3 1.358 (5) C9—C10 1.363 (6)

O2—H2 0.8200 C9—H9 0.9300

C1—C2 1.481 (6) C10—C11 1.362 (6) C2—C7 1.381 (6) C10—H10 0.9300 C2—C3 1.406 (5) C11—C12 1.351 (6) C3—C4 1.372 (6) C11—H11 0.9300 C4—C5 1.366 (6) C12—H12 0.9300 C4—H4 0.9300

(6)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A N1—H1···O2 0.86 1.90 2.627 (5) 142 O2—H2···N2i 0.82 1.88 2.676 (5) 164

C5—H5···O1ii 0.93 2.50 3.384 (6) 159

Figure

Figure 1A drawing of the molecular structure, with the atom-numbering scheme.Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level
Table 1

References

Related documents

In this study, we identified 9 protein markers for predicting time to recurrence using the protein expression data on 222 TCGA pri- marily high-grade serous ovarian cancers

For the purpose of analyzing the impurities in the water samples coming from different roofs, four building within the KCAET campus viz location 1(library -

To overcome the problems and weakness, this project need to do some research and studying to develop better technology. There are list of the objectives to be conduct

The above block diagram shows the SPV fed to Dc/Dc Converter for different dc applications, To analysis the performance of dc-dc converters(Buck, Boost,

22 subjects showing low or undetectable activities of BAT were randomly divided into 2 groups: one was exposed to cold at 17°C for 2 hours every day for 6 weeks (cold group; n

Foxo deletion on osteoblast differentiation in both bone marrow and calvaria cells suggests that the increases in ALP activity and mineralization observed in the bone

Histologically, the lesion is composed of fibrous connective tissue trabeculae (top quarter of image) and adipose connective tissue (bottom three quarters of image); within

• Data shows credit using and rationing of risk averts, risk neutrals and risk lovers respectively. As to risk averts, the credit is mainly used to pay children’s tuition, medical