• No results found

One Standard - One Test, Supplier s Declaration of Conformity (11SDoC) Scorecard objectives and concept

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "One Standard - One Test, Supplier s Declaration of Conformity (11SDoC) Scorecard objectives and concept"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ECMA

T

echnical

R

eport TR/83

June 2001

S t a n d a r d i z i n g In f o r m a t i o n a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n S y s t e m s

P h o n e : + 4 1 2 2 8 4 9 . 6 0 . 0 0 - F a x : + 4 1 2 2 8 4 9 . 6 0 . 0 1 - U R L : h t t p : / / w w w . e c m a . c h - I n t e r n e t : h e l p d e s k @ e c m a . c h

One Standard - One Test,

Supplier’s Declaration of

Conformity (11SDoC)

(2)
(3)

Draft ECMA

T

echnical

R

eport TR/83

June 2001

S t a n d a r d i z i n g I n f o r m a t i o n a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n S y s t e m s

P h o n e : + 4 1 2 2 8 4 9 . 6 0 . 0 0 - F a x : + 4 1 2 2 8 4 9 . 6 0 . 0 1 - U R L : h t t p : / / w w w . e c m a . c h - I n t e r n e t : h e l p d e s k @ e c m a . c h

LL TR-083.DOC 27-09-01 14,52

One Standard - One Test,

Supplier’s Declaration of

Conformity (11SDoC)

(4)
(5)

Brief History

This ECMA Technical Report is intended to compare at high level different countries / regions of the world from the point of view of acceptance of international standards.

This ECMA TR intends to:

• create visibility for different regulations implementations;

• encourage countries on the verge of implementing something to follow the “good” examples; • help countries in their effort to remove barriers to business.

This ECMA TR will be updated regularly. Between updates, the last minute situation will be available on the ECMA web site (www.ecma.ch).

(6)
(7)

- i -

Table of contents

1 Scope 1 2 Benefits 1 2.1 Benefits to governments 1 2.2 Benefits to industry 1 2.3 Benefits to consumers 1

3 Acronyms and abbreviations 2

(8)
(9)

1 Scope

The industry objective of 11SDoC is to achieve the global acceptance of a Declaration of Conformity from suppliers and manufacturers, independent where the test data (1 Test) for a product was generated. This is only possible, if technical and quality requirements find worldwide agreement, for example based on International Standards (1 Standard).

The ideal situation from an industry viewpoint: a product is qualified against international accepted standards, the party testing the product adheres to international agreed quality standards, the supplier affixes his trade mark. There is no need for pre-market certification.

2 Benefits

The One Standard-One Test, Supplier's Declaration of Conformity Model provides benefits to governments, industry and consumers and maintains safety and protection.

The One Standard-One Test, Supplier's Declaration of Conformity Model may not be appropriate in all cases. However, the model is particularly appropriate for EMC, telecom and product safety regulations for ITE and telecommunication products.

2.1 Benefits to governments

Many governments today rely on a "pre-market surveillance" system that requires products to be tested and certified either within their own borders or by a recognised third party. This system is labour intensive, punishes good companies, and fails to expose bad companies who can "game" the system.

A post-market surveillance system allows governments to make more efficient use of scarce government resources by developing a system that assures protection for health and safety.

Ultimately, governments would avoid the costly and time-consuming process of negotiating and maintaining numerous bilateral testing and certification agreements with a global agreement to accept one standard-one test, supplier's declaration of conformity.

2.2 Benefits to industry

Anywhere from two weeks to several months will be cut from the time a product is ready for sale and the time it is approved for sale in a given country - a major savings in time-to-market given the six to twelve month product cycles typical in the IT industry.

Manufacturer's compliance costs will be reduced. Estimates suggest that removing the duplicative IT standards; testing and conformity assessment requirements could provide sizeable welfare gains of up to $47 billion for the world.

2.3 Benefits to consumers

Through a well-managed system that relies on Supplier's Declaration of Conformity and post-market surveillance, consumers can be assured that they are purchasing safe, non-interfering products that have been tested and will perform to the international safety and EMC standards.

The products they buy will not have to reflect the cost of multiple testing and certification. More manufacturers, especially the small manufacturers, will be able to import products, providing consumers with more choices and latest technologies.

(10)

- 2 -

3

Acronyms and abbreviations

11SDoC One standard, one test, Supplier’s

Declaration of Conformity JATE Japanese Association for Telecommunication Equipment CISPR International Special Committee on Radio

Interference

METI Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry DoC Declaration of Conformity MRA Mutual Recognition Agreement EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility NRTL National Recognised Test Lab

EN European Standard RTA Recognised Testing Authorities

FCC Federal Communications Commission Std Standard

IC Industry Canada TCB Telecommunication Certification Body

IEC International Electrotechnical Commission VCCI Voluntary Control Council for Interference

4 Current

scorecard

The matrix of the scorecard shows the actual situation of the acceptance of 11SDoC in the different countries. For all major areas of regulations basic information about the status of acceptance of harmonized standards, testing-, labeling-, DoC or product certification requirements are shown.

To visualise the actual country specific situation a traffic light code is used as follows:

Green OK;

Yellow to be improved;

Red unacceptable.

Scorecard explanation Matrix

Item Questions to each item: green yellow red

Std. Is country standard identical to

international (IEC/CISPR) Standard, e.g. CISPR 22? Yes Minor deviations (dev) No / Amendment needed Test Does country accept a test-report from a

laboratory located outside country or from a manufacturer?

Yes Only if MRA

exists Must test in No / country Label What is the label?

Are labels uniform for all areas? Who controls/grants label on product?

One generic label / Manufacturer One or more labels / may need registration One or more labels / Need permission

DoC Is a DoC in manufacturer file accepted? Yes No / Must be with product and/ or registered No / certification required

Cert. Is product certification mandatory? No Not

(11)

11SDoC Score Card

Canada

E U

Std.

YES

YES

(EN)

EMC

Test

YES

YES-A

NO-B

YES

Label

IC

(2)

CE

DoC

w. Product

YES

Cert.

NO

NO

Std.

YES

(1) YES+Dev YES+Dev(2 )

YES

Safety

Test

NO

(Accred.)

YES

NO

(2)

YES

Label

Cert Org.

NO

PSE (2)

CE

DoC

NO

YES

NO

(2)

Mfg. File

Cert.

YES

(Accred.)

NO

YES

(2)

NO

NO

YES

(2)

Std.

NO

(1)

YES

Telecom

Test

NO

(Accred.)

YES

Label

IC

CE

DoC

NO

w. Product

(3)

Cert.

YES

(IC)

NO

Notes:

(1) - Standard harmonized between Canada & USA, but large dev. to IEC (2) - External Power Supplies

Unacce

p

table

, chan

g

e

(3) - will be changed during revision process (late 2001) to Mfg. File

To be im

p

roved

(4) - Data for Japan do not include Category B Electrical Appliances

ok

and materials

A-Tick+Supp.Code

Local File

NO

Permit # (2)

Local File

NO

NO

(Accred./RTA

)

Local File

NO

YES

+ Dev

YES

Australia

YES

YES

C-Tick+Supp.Code

Japan (4)

NO

(NRTL)

NRTL

NO

YES

(CISPR 22+)

FCC

w. Product

NO

U S A

YES

(1)

YES

(JATE)

NO

YES

(FCC/TCB)

YES

(VCCI)

YES

VCCI

YES

NO

NO

YES

JATE

NO

YES

(NRTL)

NO

(1)

NO

(TCB/FCC lab)

FCC

(12)
(13)

Free printed copies can be ordered from: ECMA 114 Rue du Rhône CH-1204 Geneva Switzerland Fax: +41 22 849.60.01 Email: [email protected]

Files of this Technical Report can be freely downloaded from the ECMA web site (www.ecma.ch). This site gives full information on ECMA, ECMA activities, ECMA Standards and Technical Reports.

(14)

ECMA

114 Rue du Rhône CH-1204 Geneva Switzerland

References

Related documents

The purpose of the study was to investigate perceptions of principals and teachers regarding principal leadership behaviors that contribute to implementing and leading effective

However, considering the entrepreneurial structure of the Greek productive system (family-run, micro firms), some of the prerequisites for applying to vari- ous subsidy programs

The concept of a two-directional Krylov subspace and an Arnoldi process is triggered by the need of a multiparameter moment-matching based model order reduction technique

No studies to our knowledge have examined all three health measures (MVPA, sedentary behavior, components of sleep quality) using accelerometers to 1) compare health behaviors

Rudy & Kelly Academy, a Paul mitchell Partner School reserves the right to retain a student in school if the student’s progress is not satisfactory as determined by the

At first for designing this system, the disease variables were discriminated and were at the patients' disposal as a questionnaire, and after gathering the relevant data

Marketing Theory under a Service Dominant Logic Perspective”, Naples Forum on Service, June 9-12, (2015) Naples, Italy.. troviamo di fronte ad un più alto livello di

12rcfl 1PCLcI.OLG OHL IHqiu2 9tC COH2!fGUf mup nq iurethtcwuou OL JJf- BA eouitw IJJGaG qI4pLG!JCG2 Ste cxbjrn&pjc rnqccq cxbcctcq nuqc rye rqduprjc&uou 2tUJCW qujpwucc