• No results found

Characterization of specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and its subclasses (IgG1 and IgG2) against the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in a healthy adult population: proposal for response criteria.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Characterization of specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and its subclasses (IgG1 and IgG2) against the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in a healthy adult population: proposal for response criteria."

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Copyright

q

1997, American Society for Microbiology

Characterization of Specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and

Its Subclasses (IgG1 and IgG2) against the 23-Valent

Pneumococcal Vaccine in a Healthy Adult Population:

Proposal for Response Criteria

MARIA-JOSE´ RODRIGO,

1

MARC MIRAVITLLES,

2

* MARIA-JESUS CRUZ,

1

JAVIER

DE

GRACIA,

2

MONTSERRAT VENDRELL,

2

CARLOS PASCUAL,

1AND

FERRAN MORELL

2

Departments of Biochemistry (Immunology Unit)

1

and Pneumology,

2

Hospital General Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Received 13 July 1996/Returned for modification 16 October 1996/Accepted 19 December 1996

The aim of the study was to standardize an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method for the

quantification of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and its subclasses (IgG1 and IgG2) against the 23-valent

pneumo-coccal vaccine and to establish the criteria for a normal response to the vaccine. Forty healthy individuals (20

women and 20 men; mean age, 29 years) were studied. All were vaccinated with the 23-valent pneumococcal

vaccine; blood samples were drawn just prior to and 3 weeks after immunization. Quantification of specific IgG

and its subclasses was performed by an ELISA with the vaccine as the antigen. The linearity of the ELISA

method was demonstrated by the similar slopes of the linear regression lines generated from the titration of

sera with different antibody concentrations. The specificity of the antibodies against the vaccine was

demon-strated by (i) an absorption test with pneumococcal vaccine, (ii) a cross-reactivity experiment with

Haemophilus

influenzae

type b polysaccharide, and (iii) affinity chromatography with protein A-Sepharose. Response to the

vaccine was defined by using the lower level of the 90% probability interval (one-tailed) for

postimmunization-specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2. By using this cutoff, responders were considered to be those with an absolute

increase in antibody titers higher than 395 arbitrary units/ml for IgG, 0.350

A

450

units for IgG1, and 0.314

A

450

units for IgG2. Overall, 20 (50%) subjects had IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 responses, 9 (22.5%) had IgG and IgG2

responses, 4 (10%) had IgG1 responses, 3 (7.5%) had IgG and IgG1 responses, and 4 (10%) were

nonre-sponders. Ninety percent of our population responded to the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine. Up to 10% of

healthy individuals may respond to an IgG subclass without significant increases in total IgG titers. The ELISA

method that is described may be useful for evaluating the specific antibody response against polysaccharides.

The latest review of humoral immunodeficiencies by the

World Health Organization includes a syndrome characterized

by a lack of response to polysaccharide antigens (30). This

impaired antibody response has also been observed to be

as-sociated with known immunologic deficiencies such as

com-mon variable immunodeficiency (6, 25), immunoglobulin A

(IgA) deficiency (7, 21), or IgG subclass deficiency (8, 26).

Diagnosis of this syndrome requires demonstration of an

impaired antibody response to polysaccharide vaccines such as

the pneumococcal vaccine. Different studies carried out to

diagnose this syndrome, as well as those conducted to assess

the response to the pneumococcal vaccine in risk groups, have

been hampered by the need for a control group, since no

adequate standardization of a normal response to the vaccine

exists. In order to establish criteria for the normal specific

response, it is indispensable to know natural and

postimmuni-zation levels in a healthy adult reference population. The aim

of this study was to establish an enzyme-linked immunosorbent

assay (ELISA) method to quantify specific IgG and its

sub-classes in subjects immunized with the 23-valent pneumococcal

vaccine and to establish the criteria for a normal response to

this stimulation. These criteria could be used to (i) identify

patients with impaired antibody responses to polysaccharides

(1, 30) and (ii) evaluate antibody responses in certain risk

groups that are candidates for the vaccine (22).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population.Forty healthy nonrelated volunteers (20 women and 20 men; age range, 21 to 48 years; mean age, 29.5 years) were studied.

Immunization.All individuals were vaccinated with 0.5 ml of PNU-Immune 23 polyvalent antipneumococcal vaccine (Lederle Laboratories Division, Pearl River, N.Y.) administered intramuscularly in the deltoids. This vaccine contained 25mg of each of the 23 specific capsular polysaccharides. Blood samples were obtained from each individual prior to and 21 days postvaccine administration. These samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min, and the sera were obtained, stored in aliquots, and frozen at2208C until they were studied.

Immunoglobulin quantification.IgG, IgA, and IgM levels were determined by kinetic nephelometry (Array Protein System; Beckman Instruments, Brea, Cal-if.). The reference values established in our laboratory were as follows: IgG, 8.5 to 16 g/liter; IgA, 0.75 to 3.5 g/liter; and IgM, 0.58 to 2.5 g/liter.

The levels of the IgG subclasses were determined by an ELISA technique. The reference values established in our laboratory were as follows: IgG1, 2.61 to 10.81 g/liter; IgG2, 1.12 to 4.08 g/liter; IgG3, 0.22 to 2.88 g/liter; and IgG4, 0.05 to 1.56 g/liter (18).

Specific IgG and IgG subclasses to pneumococcal vaccine.Specific IgG to

Streptococcus pneumoniaewas determined by an ELISA based on the method described by Metzger et al. (15) but that was modified by using the pneumococcal vaccine as the antigen. Each well of high-level-binding microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.) contained 10mg of antigen in 0.2 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6), and the plates were incubated at 48C overnight. Washing (0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline [pH 7.5], 0.005% Tween 20) and blocking (phosphate-buffered saline, 1% bovine serum albumin) were then performed. After the washing, the plates were incubated with sera by using a standard curve at appropriate dilutions for 2 h at 378C, in duplicate. The results were then com-pared with those on the standard curve. After the washings, horseradish perox-idase-labelled anti-human IgG (clone MH16-1ME; 0.5mg/ml) was incubated for 2 h at 378C. Following the washing, the reaction was developed with 3,39,5,59

-* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Servei de Pneumologia,

Hospital General Vall d’Hebron, P. Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035

Barcelona, Spain. Phone and fax: 34-3-428.61.04.

168

on August 17, 2020 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

(2)

tetramethylbenzidine–3% H2O2for 20 minutes at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was stopped with 2 M H2SO4, and the results were read at 450 nm with a plate reader (Titertek Multiskan Plus MKII).

The results were expressed as arbitrary units by using a reference serum containing 2,240 U/ml calibrated against a pneumococcal reference preparation labelled PN-A, with an assigned value of 70 pneumococcal IgG antibody U/ml, from the European Quality Scheme for specific antibodies (Oxfordshire Health Authority, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom), kindly donated by N. Matamoros (Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain). To study the behavior of sera compared to that of the reference serum, we performed titra-tions of five serum samples with antipneumococcal antibody levels of between 150 and 2,250 U/ml. The curves obtained for the sera and the reference serum were plotted for linear regression analysis.

The amounts of specific IgG1 and IgG2 were determined by the same method used to determine the amount of specific total IgG by using horseradish perox-idase-labelled anti-human IgG1 (clone MH161-1) and IgG2 (clone HP6014), and the results were expressed asA450units. For specific total IgG, the minimal amount of antibody detectable by this assay was 0.11 U/ml. This value was obtained as the mean plus 3 standard deviations of the value for the calibrator with a value of 0 performed for 20 determinations. Within-run and day-to-day coefficients of variation were 7.6 and 10.5%, respectively.

For the IgG subclasses, the minimal amount of antibody detectable by these assays was 0.200A450unit above the value for the blank. The limit of detection was calculated on the basis of the mean plus 3 standard deviations of the value for the blank also performed for 20 determinations. Within-run and day-to-day coefficients of variation were 6.5 and 10.6%, respectively, for IgG1 and 10.3 and 11.3%, respectively, for IgG2.

Specificity of the antibodies to vaccine. (i) Inhibition experiments.Increasing concentrations (range, 0 to 80mg/ml) of pneumococcal vaccine were incubated with 1 ml of a 1:50 dilution of two pools of sera with specific IgG concentrations of 9,250 and 150 U/ml, respectively, for 2 h at 378C and were separated by centrifugation at 3,500 rpm before the addition of serum to vaccine-coated plates. The procedure was carried out three times.

(ii) Cross-reactivity between anti-S. pneumoniaeand anti-Hib antibodies. Be-cause the capsular antigens ofS. pneumoniaeandHaemophilus influenzaeare both polysaccharide antigens, we tested to see whether binding in the anti-S. pneumoniaeELISA of any serum could be inhibited byH. influenzaetype b (Hib) polysaccharide.

The same two pools of sera used in the inhibition experiments were incubated with increasing concentrations ofH. influenzaepolysaccharide (range, 0 to 80 mg/ml) for 2 h at 378C and the contents were separated by centrifugation at 3,500 rpm. The amount of specific IgG toS. pneumoniae in the supernatant was measured by the same ELISA method.

(iii) Purified IgG antibodies.To obtain IgG-enriched antibody preparations, affinity chromatography with protein A–Sepharose CL-4B (Pharmacia Diagnos-tics, Uppsala, Sweden) was performed (13). The column (5 ml) was equilibrated with 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). A postvaccination serum pool (IgA, 226 mg/dl; IgM, 112 mg/dl; IgG, 1,190 mg/dl; IgG1, 717 mg/dl; IgG2, 493 mg/dl; IgG3, 76 mg/dl; IgG4, 33 mg/dl; and specific IgG toS. pneumoniae, 3,300 U/ml) was loaded in the column and the column was washed with the equilibrated buffer. Bound proteins were removed with 100 mM glycine buffer (pH 3). The fractions from the peak maxima (higher than 0.200A280unit) of the two eluates obtained were collected. The immunoglobulins, including IgG subclasses and IgG specific toS. pneumoniae, were determined in each eluate.

Data analysis.The results were expressed as the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the pre- and postimmunization antibody titers; the same results were calculated for differences and ratios of antibody titers. For calculations, antibody titers, as well as changes in titers, were transformed to their natural logarithms to meet the assumption of normality. Because of the characteristics of this transformation, whenever the difference between post- and preimmunization titers was negative or the ratio was,1, these values were assigned the lowest value of the variable.

In these calculations, samples with undetectable levels were also assigned the value of the lower limit of detection. An arbitrary value was defined as the minimum significant increase to define the response to the vaccine. This value corresponds to the lower limit of the 90% probability interval (one-tailed) of the variables comprising the amounts of specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 postimmuni-zation. All subjects showing an increase in specific antibody titers equal to or greater than this value were considered responders.

RESULTS

Linearity of the ELISA method.

Each serum sample was

tested at different dilutions to create a curve. Figure 1 shows

the regression lines that were generated. The slope of each

curve was similar to that for the reference serum, and thus, we

may assume that the behaviors of sera and the reference serum

do not differ. In all, eight different dilutions of each serum

sample were tested, and the regression lines were created with

four points.

Specificity of the antibodies to the vaccine. (i) Effect of

adsorption with the pneumococcal vaccine.

Results of

inhibi-tion experiments in which the pneumococcal vaccine was

added to the sera showed decreases in the mean

A

450

of from

2.5 to 0.6 and from 0.4 to

,

0.05, indicating effective

competi-tion with the coated pneumococcal polysaccharides for

anti-body binding (Fig. 2).

(ii) Cross-reactivity experiment.

As expected, soluble Hib

polysaccharide added to the sera did not decrease the

absor-bance of specific IgG to

S. pneumoniae

before or after

incu-bation with Hib polysaccharide (Fig. 2).

(iii) Purified IgG antibodies.

Figure 3 shows the elution

patterns obtained from affinity chromatography with protein

A-Sepharose. In the first peak, containing fractions with

elu-tion volumes of between 4 and 10 ml, the following results were

obtained: IgG, 20 mg/dl; IgA, 97 mg/dl; IgM, 30 mg/dl; IgG1,

,

5 mg/dl; IgG2,

,

5 mg/dl; IgG3, 20 mg/dl; IgG4,

,

5 mg/dl;

and IgG specific to

S. pneumoniae

, 17 U/ml.

The results for the second peak, containing fractions with

elution volumes of between 14 and 20 ml, were as follows: IgG,

716 mg/dl; IgA, 19 mg/dl; IgM, 16 mg/dl; IgG1, 400 mg/dl;

IgG2, 320 mg/dl; IgG3,

,

5 mg/dl; IgG4, 16 mg/dl; and IgG

specific to

S. pneumoniae

, 3,200 U/ml.

Antibody response to the vaccine.

Table 1 presents the

val-ues for specific antipneumococcal IgG, IgG1, and IgG2

pre-and postimmunization in our study population.

To define response in our population, we calculated the 90%

CI (one-tailed) of the log-transformed titers of total IgG, IgG1,

and IgG2 in postimmunization sera. The lower limits of the CI

were 395 U/ml for IgG, 0.350

A

450

units for IgG1, and 0.314

A

450

units for IgG2. We took these values to be the minimum

significant increase and defined a responder as an individual

who has an increase in antibody titers greater than these

val-ues.

Figure 4 presents the distribution of responses of specific

IgG and its subtypes (IgG1 and IgG2). Of the 40 subjects

studied, 32 (80%) met the response criteria for specific total

FIG. 1. Regression lines for samples with different antipneumococcal anti-body titers and the reference serum sample. Titers of antibodies and slopes are presented.ç, 2,560 U/ml (Sl,24.631025; reference serum);V, 600 U/ml (Sl,

23.531025);l, 300 U/ml (Sl,2331025);VV, 150 U/ml (Sl,22.731025);., 2,050 U/ml (Sl,2531025);h, 2,250 U/ml (Sl,24.931025).

on August 17, 2020 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

(3)

IgG, 27 (67.5%) met the response criteria for IgG1, and 29

(72.5%) met the response criteria for IgG2. Of the eight who

failed to respond adequately with total IgG, four responded

with IgG1 and four presented no response with any of the

subclasses.

To establish response reference values for each of the

sub-classes, the means (95% CIs) for postvaccine values of

re-sponders were used for IgG1 and IgG2 and were 1.118 (0.949

to 1.318;

n

5

27) and 1.376 (1.192 to 1.559;

n

5

29)

A

450

units,

respectively.

DISCUSSION

In this study, an ELISA method was used to assess specific

IgG and its subclasses against pneumococcal capsular

polysac-charide antigens. Like Siber et al. (23) and Mascart-Lemone et

al. (14), we used the polyvalent pneumococcal vaccine coupled

to the polystyrene plate as the antigen. The inconvenience of

using the vaccine is that polysaccharides bind poorly to plastic

surfaces, and high concentrations must be used with extended

coating times (2); in contrast, it possesses the advantage that it

is not conjugated with any protein, and therefore, the response

detected is specific to polysaccharides. The specificity of this

method is demonstrated by (i) the decrease in specific

anti-pneumococcal IgG titers obtained in postvaccination samples

prior to adsorption of the same sample with polysaccharide

antigens (Fig. 2), (ii) the lack of cross-reactions with Hib (Fig.

2), and (iii) the results obtained after IgG purification by

af-finity chromatography with protein A (Fig. 3).

Our ELISA method differs in some aspects from the

pre-liminary standard pneumococcal ELISA protocol proposed by

the World Health Organization (10), because our study was

initiated in 1993 before the World Health Organization project

started. In any event, the standard protocol is directed mainly

to the use of a standard method of evaluating the

immunolog-ical efficacies of the new conjugated vaccines and uses a

refer-ence serum composed of 10 serotypes, the total antibody

val-ues of which are still considered provisional. Our aim was to

define the criteria for the antibody response to pneumococcal

polysaccharides for use in the diagnosis of the lack of response

to polysaccharide antigen syndrome in patients with recurrent

respiratory infections. For this purpose, the use of particular

FIG. 2. Effect of absorption with pneumococcal vaccine and cross-reactivity between anti-S. pneumoniaeand anti-Hib antibodies. (A) Serum with specific IgG toS. pneumoniaeof 9,250 U/ml (2.5A450units). (B) Serum with specific IgG toS. pneumoniaeof 150 U/ml (0.4A450units).n, adsorption with pneumococcal vaccine; , adsorption with Hib vaccine.

FIG. 3. Elution patterns of a pool of sera from individuals postvaccination obtained by protein A–Sepharose CL-4B affinity chromatography.M, phosphate, 20 mM (pH 7.2); , glycine, 100 mM (pH 3);&, units.

on August 17, 2020 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

(4)

serotypes as antigens might lead to misdiagnosis, since, owing

to different previous exposures, different geographical

distri-butions of serotypes, or simply chance, a lack of response to

these serotypes does not rule out an appropriate response to

others.

By our ELISA method we observed that 80% (32 of 40) of

our population responded with a significant increase in their

specific total IgG titers and 10% (4 of 40) responded with an

increase exclusively in IgG1, but with no significant

modifica-tion in their total IgG values. In view of this, we propose that

the response of the different IgG subclasses together with total

IgG be studied before classifying an individual as a

nonre-sponder. Since a lack of response to any particular IgG

sub-class may be normal, the concentrations of different specific

IgG subclasses should be compared with the range of

concen-trations of the controls who responded with this particular

subclass. The postimmunization titers of responders for both

IgG1 and IgG2 are presented in the Results section.

There is no uniform criterion for the expression of a specific

antibody response. Thus, some studies express response as the

fold increase. Wong et al. (29) found a mean increase in

spe-cific IgG of 7.3 times in healthy volunteers, and Cryz et al. (4)

considered a response to exist when the increase was equal to

or higher than four times the basal value and found responses

in 77% of white Anglo-Saxon individuals and 45% Hispanics.

In contrast, Kroon et al. (11) considered an increase of more

than twice the basal value to be positive, and in a study with 10

healthy subjects, all of whom were responders, they found a

mean increase of 5.8, a little higher than the 4.2 found in our

study. Musher et al. (16), using an ELISA method and the

same criterion as before, found 93 to 100% responders to five

pneumococcal polysaccharides among 15 healthy individuals.

Those same investigators, in a later work (19) with 25

individ-uals, found a lower percentage (between 60 and 84%) of

re-sponders, similar to the 80% found in our population for total

IgG by using our response criterion. In a recent study, Weiss et

al. (28) obtained results similar to ours for a control group of

15 healthy individuals with a mean age similar to that of our

group (30.5 years): a mean fold rise in antibody titers for five

separate polysaccharides of from 3.1 to 13.5 and a proportion

of responders (those with at least a twofold increase) to the

different polysaccharides of from 40 to 87%. However, other

investigators define response as obtaining some

postimmuni-zation values considered to be protective. In this respect, some

investigators have suggested a protective pneumococcal

anti-body level of 300 ng of N/ml, as measured by

radioimmunoas-say (12). This approach may give rise to error, since a normal

immune response and protective levels are not synonymous.

Moreover, protection against pneumococcal infection depends

on many other immunologic as well as nonimmunologic factors

(9). The use of fold increases to assess response offers the

advantage of permitting comparisons with other laboratories

since they are not influenced by the units used in the

expres-sion of the results. Nevertheless, it must be borne in mind that

the use of fold increases may prove to be deceptive, because it

is not the same to duplicate from low values or high values

(27). Thus, for correct response evaluation, we believe that it

would be useful to use a yardstick not influenced by

preimmu-nization titers. In this respect, we propose the use of the lower

limit of the 90% probability interval of postimmunization

ti-ters; i.e., if our population represents the general population, a

normal subject has a 95% probability of presenting a

postim-munization titer above this value. We have termed this value

the minimum significant increase (MSI) and define a

re-sponder as an individual who suffers an increase greater than

this value (final value

2

initial value

.

MSI). The MSI

ob-tained for total IgG was 395 arbitrary units/ml, that for IgG1

was 0.350

A

450

units, and that for IgG2 was 0.314

A

450

units.

With respect to the specific IgG isotype response, it has

classically been accepted that the response of antibodies to

protein antigens is predominantly of the IgG1 and IgG3 types,

whereas the response to polysaccharide antigens in adults is

mainly of the IgG2 type (3, 24). In our study, we found that

67.5% (27 of 40) of individuals responded with a significant

increase in IgG1. Of these, four responded only with this

sub-class. In contrast, the greatest increases were observed for

IgG2, and the number of responders was slightly higher, 72.5%

(29 of 40), although none responded with IgG2 alone. These

results are similar to those obtained in other studies, which

show a mixed response of IgG1 and IgG2 (5, 17, 20). It must be

emphasized that in our population four of the nonresponders

with total IgG responded with some of the subclasses, which

would justify study of the same subclasses.

We believe that establishment of defined criteria for the

specific total IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 response to pneumococci is

a step forward in research on the efficacy of the vaccine in risk

groups and will permit in-depth studies of the immunological

response in patients with known humoral immunodeficiencies

or suspected selective response deficiencies to polysaccharide

antigens.

FIG. 4. Distribution of the specific antibody response againstS. pneumoniae.

TABLE 1. Titers of specific anti-S. pneumoniae

IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 before and after vaccination

Immunoglobulin Mean value (95% CI)

a

Fold increase Prevaccination Postvaccination Increase

Total IgG

b

508 (407–645)

1,686 (1,274–2,230)

1,767 (539–2,995)

4.27 (2.18–6.35)

IgG1

c

0.350 (0.287–0.428)

0.880 (0.735–1.053)

0.596 (0.373–0.819)

3.08 (1.85–4.31)

IgG2

c

0.350 (0.296–0.416)

0.944 (0.765–1.164)

0.747 (0.464–1.031)

3.82 (2.03–5.60)

aData are means for 40 subjects.

bValues for IgG are in arbitrary units per milliliter. cValues for IgG1 and IgG2 areA

450units.

on August 17, 2020 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

(5)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported in part by a grant from Fondo de

Inves-tigaciones de la Seguridad Social (FISS 93/0482).

REFERENCES

1.Ambrosino, D. M., G. R. Siber, B. A. Chilmonczik, J. B. Jernberg, and R. W. Finberg.1987. An immunodeficiency characterized by impaired antibody responses to polysaccharides. N. Engl. J. Med.316:790–793.

2.Barra, A., D. Schulz, P. Aucouturier, and J. L. Preud’homme.1988. Mea-surement of anti-Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide antibodies by ELISA. J. Immunol. Methods115:111–116.

3.Barret, D. J., and E. M. Ayoub.1986. IgG2 subclass restriction of antibody to pneumococcal polysaccharides. Clin. Exp. Immunol.63:127–134. 4.Cryz, S. J., E. Fu¨rer, T. Fredeking, A. S. Cross, J. C. Sadoff, and J. U. Que.

1989. Effect of race and blood group on the immune response to bacterial polysaccharide and conjugated vaccines. Lancetx:1533–1534.

5.Cudwin, D. S., S. G. Artrip, and G. Schiffman.1987. Immunoglobulin G class and subclass antibodies to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.44:114–121.

6.Cunningham-Rundles, C.1989. Clinical and immunologic analyses of 103 patients with common variable immunodeficiency. J. Clin. Immunol.9:22– 33.

7.De Gracia, J., M. Miravitlles, M. Vendrell, M. J. Rodrigo, R. Codina, and F. Morell.1995. Estudio de las subclases de la IgG en pacientes con de´ficit de IgA sintoma´ticos. Med. Clin. (Barcelona)104:728–731.

8.De Gracia, J., M. J. Rodrigo, F. Morell, M. Vendrell, M. Miravitlles, M. J. Cruz, R. Codina, and J. M. Bofill.1996. IgG subclass deficiencies associated with bronchiectasis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.153:650–655. 9.De Velasco, A., B. A. Dekker, A. F. Verheul, R. G. Feldman, J. Verhoef, and

H. Snippe.1995. Antipolysaccharide immunoglobulin isotype levels and op-sonic activity of antisera: relationships with protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in mice. J. Infect. Dis.172:562–565.

10. Frasch, C., D. Goldblatt, and G. Carlone (ed.).1996. Summary of the proceedings of the WHO Workshop on Pneumococcal ELISA Standardiza-tion. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.

11. Kroon, F. P., J. T. Van Dissel, J. C. de Jong, and R. van Furth.1994. Antibody response to influenza, tetanus and pneumococcal vaccines in HIV-seropositive individuals in relation to the number of CD41lymphocytes. AIDS8:469–476.

12. Landesman, S. H., and G. Schiffman.1981. Assessment of the antibody response to pneumococcal vaccine in high-risk populations. Rev. Infect. Dis.

3(Suppl.):S184–S196.

13. Leibl, H., W. Erber, M. Eibl, and J. Mannhalter.1993. Separation of poly-saccharide-specific human immunoglobulin G subclasses using a protein A-Sepharose column with a pH gradient elution system. J. Chromatogr.

639:51–56.

14. Mascart-Lemone, F., M. Ge´rard, M. Libin, A. Crusiaux, P. Franchioly, A. Lambrechts, et al.1995. Differential effect of human immunodeficiency virus infection on the IgA and IgG antibody responses to pneumococcal vaccine. J. Infect. Dis.172:1253–1260.

15. Metzger, W. J., J. E. Butler, D. Swanson, E. Reinders, and H. B. Richardson.

1981. Amplification of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measur-ing allergen-specific IgE and IgG antibody. Clin. Allergy11:523–531. 16. Musher, D., M. J. Luchi, D. Watson, R. Hamilton, and R. Baughn.1990.

Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in young adults and older bronchitics: determination of IgG responses by ELISA and the effect of adsorption of serum with non-type-specific cell wall polysaccharide. J. Infect. Dis.161:728– 735.

17. Oldfield, S., S. Jenkins, H. Yeoman, D. Gray, and I. C. M. Maclennan.1985. Class and subclass antipneumococcal antibody responses in splenectomized patients. Clin. Exp. Immunol.61:664–673.

18. Rodrigo, M. J., R. Codina, J. De Gracia, F. Morell, and C. Pascual.1992. Valores normales de las subclases de la inmunoglobulina G en una poblacio´n de adultos. Su importancia en el estudio de los de´ficits de las mismas. Med. Clin. (Barcelona)98:166–170.

19. Rodriguez Barradas, M., D. M. Musher, C. Lahart, C. Lacke, J. Groover, D. Watson, R. Baughn, T. Cate, and G. Crofoot.1992. Antibody to capsular polysaccharides ofStreptococcus pneumoniaeafter vaccination of human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects with 23-valent pneumococcal vac-cine. J. Infect. Dis.165:553–556.

20. Rynnel-Dago¨o¨, B., A. Freijd, and K. Prellner.1985. Antibody activity of IgG subclasses against pneumococcal polysaccharides after vaccination. Am. J. Otolaryngol.6:275–279.

21. Schaffer, F. M., R. C. Monteiro, J. E. Volanakis, and M. D. Cooper.1991. IgA deficiency. Immunodefic. Rev.3:15–44.

22. Siber, G. R.1994. Pneumococcal disease: prospects for a new generation of vaccines. Science265:1385–1387.

23. Siber, G. R., C. Priehs, and D. W. Madore.1989. Standardization of antibody assays for measuring response to pneumococcal infection and immunization. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.8:S84–S91.

24. Siber, G. R., P. H. Schur, A. C. Aisenberg, S. A. Weitzman, and G. Schiffman.

1980. Correlation between serum IgG2 concentrations and the antibody response to bacterial polysaccharide antigens. N. Engl. J. Med.303:178–182. 25. Sneller, M. C., W. Strober, E. Eisenstein, J. S. Jaffe, and C. Cunningham-Rundles.1993. New insights into common variable immunodeficiency. NIH conference. Ann. Intern. Med.118:720–730.

26. Umetsu, D. T., D. M. Ambrosino, I. Quinti, G. R. Siber, and R. S. Geha.

1985. Recurrent sinopulmonary infection and impaired antibody response to bacterial capsular polysaccharide antigen in children with selective IgG-subclass deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med.313:1247–1251.

27. Wasserman, R. L. (ed.).1990. Antibody deficiency: IgG subclass deficiency and vaccine nonresponder states. Pediatr. Infect. Dis.9:424–433. 28. Weiss, P. J., M. R. Wallace, E. C. Oldfield III, J. O’Brien, and E. N. Janoff.

1995. Response of recent human immunodeficiency virus seroconverters to the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine. J. Infect. Dis.171:1217–1222.

29. Wong, W. Y., G. D. Overturf, and D. R. Powars.1992. Infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in children with sickle cell disease: epidemiology, immunologic mechanism, prophylaxis and vaccination. Clin. Infect. Dis.14:

124–136.

30. World Health Organization.1995. Primary immunodeficiency diseases. Re-port of a WHO Scientific Group. Clin. Exp. Immunol.99:S2–S24.

on August 17, 2020 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Figure

FIG. 1. Regression lines for samples with different antipneumococcal anti-body titers and the reference serum sample
FIG. 3. Elution patterns of a pool of sera from individuals postvaccination obtained by protein A–Sepharose CL-4B affinity chromatography
TABLE 1. Titers of specific anti-S. pneumoniae IgG, IgG1, and IgG2 before and after vaccination

References

Related documents

The relationship between the degree of hemorrhage and the cause of hemorrhage: the division of the studied cases by cause into groups: uterine inertia, genital tract trauma, partial

The work here presented showed a comparison between using the decoupled and the integral simulation approach for the computation of the response spectra due to

complex. B) Stoichiometric C–H activation of hexane with an iridium complex. Ni-catalyzed C–H bond stannylation of fluorinated aromatics. Ni-catalyzed alkene hydroarylation of

The study will attempt to understand if using imagery will influence children’s motivation to participate in leisure-time physical activity (free time active play). POTENTIAL

Apart from describing wearables, the author in [9] highlights the pros and cons of the technology.In [10] the author explains that smart clothes and wearable technology is a

In this paper presents proposed the Fuzzy kernel mapping with density clustering algorithm (FKMDC) algorithm for the soft clustering algorithm is in core variations

As PSR is able to maintain more network topology information than distance vector (DV) routing to facilitate source routing, also with that it has much smaller overhead than

Synergy of pancratistatin and tamoxifen on breast cancer cells in inducing apoptosis by targeting mitochondria..