• No results found

An implicit method for finding a common fixed point of a representation of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "An implicit method for finding a common fixed point of a representation of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

An implicit method for finding a common

fixed point of a representation of

nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces

Nawab Hussain

1

, Mahmood Lashkarizadeh Bami

2

and Ebrahim Soori

3*

*Correspondence: [email protected];

[email protected] 3Department of Mathematics,

Lorestan University, P.O. Box 465, Khoramabad, Lorestan, Iran Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

We introduce an implicit method for finding an element of the set of common fixed points of a representation of nonexpansive mappings. Then we prove the strong convergence of the proposed implicit scheme to the common fixed point of a representation of nonexpansive mappings.

MSC: 90C33; 47H10

Keywords: fixed point; nonexpansive mapping; representation; semigroup; sunny nonexpansive retraction

1 Introduction

LetCbe a nonempty closed and convex subset of a Banach spaceEandE∗ be the dual space ofE. Let·,·denote the pairing betweenEandE∗. The normalized duality mapping

J:EE∗is defined by

J(x) =fE∗:x,f=x=f

for allxE. In the sequel, we usejto denote the single-valued normalized duality map-ping. LetU={xE:x= }.Eis said to be smooth or to have a Gâteaux differentiable norm if the limit

lim

t→

x+tyx t

exists for eachx,yU.E is said to have a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm if for eachyU, the limit is attained uniformly for allxU.Eis said to be uniformly smooth or is said to have a uniformly Féchet differentiable norm if the limit is attained uniformly forx,yU. It is known that if the norm ofE is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable, then the duality mappingJis single-valued and uniformly norm to weak∗continuous on each bounded subset ofE. A Banach spaceEis smooth if the duality mappingJofEis single-valued. We know that ifEis smooth, thenJ is norm to weak-star continuous; for more details, see [].

LetCbe a nonempty closed and convex subset of a Banach spaceE. A mappingT ofC

into itself is called nonexpansive ifTxTyxyfor allx,yC, and a mappingf is anα-contraction onEiff(x) –f(y) ≤αxy,x,yEsuch that ≤α< .

(2)

In this paper, motivated by Lashkarizadeh Bami and Soori [] and Hussain and Taka-hashi [], we introduce the following general implicit algorithm for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a representationS={Tt:tS}of a semigroupSas nonexpansive mappings fromCinto itself, with respect to a left regular sequence of means defined on an appropriate subspace of bounded real-valued functions of the semigroup. On the other hand, our goal is to prove that there exists a sunny nonexpansive retractionP

ofContoFix(S) andxCsuch that the following sequence{zn}converges strongly toPx:

zn=nf(zn) + ( –n)Tμnzn (n∈N).

2 Preliminaries

LetS be a semigroup. We denote byB(S) the Banach space of all bounded real-valued functions defined onSwith supremum norm. For eachsSandfB(S), we definelsand

rsinB(S) by

(lsf)(t) =f(st), (rsf)(t) =f(ts) (tS).

LetXbe a subspace ofB(S) containing , and letX∗be its topological dual. An elementμ ofX∗is said to be a mean onXifμ=μ() = . We often writeμt(f(t)) instead ofμ(f) forμX∗ andfX. LetXbe left invariant (resp. right invariant),i.e.,ls(X)⊂X(resp.

rs(X)⊂X) for eachsS. A meanμonXis said to be left invariant (resp. right invariant) ifμ(lsf) =μ(f) (resp.μ(rsf) =μ(f)) for eachsSandfX.Xis said to be left (resp. right) amenable ifXhas a left (resp. right) invariant mean.Xis amenable ifXis both left and right amenable. As is well known,B(S) is amenable whenSis a commutative semigroup (see p. of []). A net{μα}of means onXis said to be left regular if

lim α l

sμαμα= 

for eachsS, wherels is the adjoint operator ofls.

Letf be a function of the semigroupSinto a reflexive Banach spaceEsuch that the weak closure of{f(t) :tS}is weakly compact, and letXbe a subspace ofB(S) containing all the functionstf(t),x∗withx∗∈E∗. We know from [] that for anyμX∗, there exists a unique elementinEsuch that,x∗=μtf(t),x∗for allx∗∈E∗. We denote such

byf(t) dμ(t). Moreover, ifμis a mean onX, then from [],f(t) dμ(t)∈co{f(t) :tS}. LetCbe a nonempty closed and convex subset ofE. Then a familyS={Ts:sS}of mappings fromCinto itself is said to be a representation ofSas a nonexpansive mapping onCinto itself ifSsatisfies the following:

() Tstx=TsTtxfor alls,tSandxC;

() for everysS, the mappingTs:CCis nonexpansive.

We denote byFix(S) the set of common fixed points ofS, that is,Fix(S) =sS{xC:

Tsx=x}.

Theorem .[] Let S be a semigroup,let C be a closed,convex subset of a reflexive Banach space E,S={Ts:sS}be a representation of S as a nonexpansive mapping from C into

itself such that weak closure of{Ttx:tS}is weakly compact for each xC,and let X be

(3)

each xC and x∗∈E,andμbe a mean on X.If we write Tμx instead of

Ttxdμ(t),then

the following hold.

(i) Tμis a nonexpansive mapping fromCintoC. (ii) Tμx=xfor eachx∈Fix(S).

(iii) Tμx∈co{Ttx:tS}for eachxC.

(iv) IfXisrs-invariant for eachsSandμis right invariant,thenTμTt=Tμfor each

tS.

Remark From Theorem .. in [], every uniformly convex Banach space is strictly

con-vex and reflexive.

LetDbe a subset ofB, whereBis a subset of a Banach spaceE, and letPbe a retraction ofBontoD, that is,Px=xfor eachxD. ThenPis said to be sunny if for eachxB

andt≥ withPx+t(xPx)∈B,P(Px+t(xPx)) =Px. A subsetDofBis said to be a sunny nonexpansive retract ofBif there exists a sunny nonexpansive retractionPofB

ontoD. We know that ifE is smooth andPis a retraction ofBontoD, thenPis sunny and nonexpansive if and only if for eachxBandzD,xPx,J(zPx) ≤. For more details, see [].

Lemma .[] Let S be a semigroup,and let C be a compact convex subset of a real strictly convex and smooth Banach space E.Suppose thatS={Ts:sS}is a representation of S as

a nonexpansive mapping from C into itself.Let X be a left invariant subspace of B(S)such that∈X,and the function tTtx,xis an element of X for each xC and x∗∈E∗.

Ifμis a left invariant mean on X,thenFix() =TμC=Fix(S)and there exists a unique

sunny nonexpansive retraction from C ontoFix(S).

Throughout the rest of this paper, the open ball of radiusrcentered at  is denoted byBr. LetCbe a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach spaceE. For>  and a mapping

T:CC, we letF(T) be the set of-approximate fixed points ofT,i.e.,F(T) ={xC:

xTx}.

3 Main result

In this section, we deal with a strong convergence approximation scheme for finding a common element of the set of common fixed points of a representation of nonexpansive mappings.

Theorem . Let S be a semigroup.Let C be a nonempty compact convex subset of a real

strictly convex and reflexive and smooth Banach space E.Suppose thatS={Ts:sS}is a

representation of S as a nonexpansive mapping from C into itself such thatFix(S)=∅.Let X be a left invariant subspace of B(S)such that∈X,and the function tTtx,xis an

element of X for each xC and x∗∈E∗.Let{μn}be a left regular sequence of means on X.

Suppose that f is anα-contraction on C.Letnbe a sequence in(, )such thatlimnn= .

Then there exists a unique sunny nonexpansive retraction P of C ontoFix(S)and xC such that the following sequence{zn}generated by

zn=nf(zn) + ( –n)Tμnzn (n∈N) ()

(4)

Proof By Proposition .. and Theorem .. in [], any compact subsetCof a reflexive Banach spaceEis weakly compact, and from Proposition .. in [], any closed convex subset of a weakly compact subsetCof a Banach spaceEis itself weakly compact, and by Proposition .. in [], any convex subsetCof a normed spaceEis weakly closed if and only ifCis closed. Therefore, weak closure of{Ttx:tS}is weakly compact for each

xC.

We divide the proof into five steps.

Step . The existence ofznwhich satisfies ().

This follows immediately from the fact that for everyn∈N, the mappingNngiven by

Nnx:=nf(x) + ( –n)Tμnx (xC)

is a contraction. To see this, putβn= ( +n(α– )), then ≤βn<  (n∈N). Then we have NnxNnynf(x) –f(y)+ ( –n)TμnxTμny

nαxy+ ( –n)xy = +n(α– )

xy=βnxy.

Therefore, by the Banach contraction principle [], there exists a unique pointznCsuch thatNnzn=zn.

Step .limn→∞znTtzn=  for alltS.

ConsidertSand let> . By Lemma  in [], there existsδ>  such thatco(Tt) +

F(Tt). By Corollary . in [], there also exists a natural numberNsuch that

N+  N

i=

TtisyTt

N+  N

i=

Ttisy

δ ()

for allsSandyC. Letp∈Fix(S) andMbe a positive number such thatsupyCy

M. LettS, since{μn}is strongly left regular, there existsN∈Nsuch thatμnltiμn

δ

(M) fornNandi= , , . . . ,N. Then we have

sup

yC Tμny

N+  N

i=

Ttisydμn(s)

=sup

yC

sup x∗=

Tμny,x

N+  N

i=

Ttisydμn(s),x

=sup

yC

sup x∗=

N+  N

i=

(μn)sTsy,x

– 

N+  N

i=

(μn)sTtisy,x

≤ 

N+  N

i= sup

yC

sup x∗=

(μn)sTsy,x

ltiμn

s

Tsy,x

≤ max

i=,,...,N

μnltiμnM+ p

≤ max

i=,,...,N

μnltiμn(M)

(5)

By Theorem . we have

N+  N

i=

Ttisydμn(s)∈co

N+  N

i=

Tti(Tsy) :sS

. ()

It follows from ()-() that

Tμny∈co

N+  N

i=

Ttisy:sS

+

⊂co(Tt) + F(Tt)

for allyCandnN. Therefore,lim supn→∞supyCTt(Tμny) –Tμny. Since>  is arbitrary, we have

lim sup

n→∞

sup

yC

Tt(Tμny) –Tμny= . ()

LettSand> , then there existsδ>  which satisfies (). TakeL= ( +α)M+

f(p) –p. Now, from the conditionlimnn=  and from (), there exists a natural number

Nsuch thatTμny(Tt) for allyCandn<δL for allnN. Sincep∈Fix(S), we

have

nf(zn) –Tμnznnf(zn) –f(p)+f(p) –p+TμnpTμnzn

n

αznp+f(p) –p+Aznp

n

αznp+f(p) –p+znp

n

( +α)znp+f(p) –pn

( +α)M+f(p) –p

=nL≤

δ

for allnN. Observe that

zn=nf(zn) + ( –n)Tμnzn =Tμnzn+n

f(zn) –Tμnzn

(Tt) +Bδ

(Tt) + Bδ

F(Tt)

for allnN. This shows that

znTtzn (nN).

(6)

Step .S{zn} ⊂Fix(S), whereS{zn}denotes the set of strongly limit points of{zn}. Letz∈S{zn}, and let{znj}be a subsequence of{zn}such thatznjz,

TtzzTtzTtznj+Ttznjznj+znjz ≤znjz+Ttznjznj,

then by Step ,

Ttzz ≤lim

j znjz+limj Ttznjznj= , thereforez∈Fix(S).

Step . There exists a unique sunny nonexpansive retractionPofC ontoFix(S) and

xCsuch that :=lim sup

n

xPx,J(znPx)

≤. ()

By Lemma . there exists a unique sunny nonexpansive retractionPofContoFix(S). The Banach contraction mapping principle guarantees thatfPhas a unique fixed point

xC. We show that

:=lim sup

n

xPx,J(znPx)

≤.

Note that from the definition ofand the fact thatCis a compact subset ofE, we can select a subsequence{znj}of{zn}with the following properties:

(i) limjxPx,J(znjPx)=;

(ii) {znj}converges strongly to a pointz.

By Step , we havez∈Fix(S). SinceEis smooth, we have

=lim

j

xPx,J(znjPx)

=xPx,J(zPx)≤.

SincefPx=x, we have (fI)Px=xPx. From Theorem ..(v) in [], forx,yEand

fJ(y),x–y≥(xy,f). Therefore, for eachn∈N, we have n(α– )znPx

nαznPx+ ( –n)znPx

znPx ≥nf(zn) –f(Px)+ ( –n)TμnznPx

znPx ≥n

f(zn) –f(Px)+ ( –n)(TμnznPx) – (znPx),J(znPx)

= –n

(fI)Px,J(znPx)

= –n

xPx,J(znPx)

.

Hence

znPx≤   –α

xPx,J(znPx)

(7)

Step .{zn}strongly converges toPx.

Indeed, from (), () andPx∈Fix(S), we conclude

lim sup

n

znPx≤ 

 –αlim supn

xPx,J(znPx)

≤.

That is,znPx.

Remark . It would be an interesting problem to prove Theorem . for continuous

representations instead of nonexpansive.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.2Department of

Mathematics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. 3Department of Mathematics, Lorestan University, P.O. Box 465, Khoramabad, Lorestan, Iran.

Acknowledgements

This article was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. The first author acknowledges with thanks DSR, KAU for financial support. The authors would like to thank the referee of the paper for his helpful comments and invaluable suggestions. This research was supported by the Center of Excellence for Mathematics and the Office of Graduate Studies of the Lorestan University and the University of Isfahan.

Received: 31 August 2014 Accepted: 12 November 2014 Published:04 Dec 2014 References

1. Takahashi, W: Nonlinear Functional Analysis: Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama (2000)

2. Lashkarizadeh Bami, M, Soori, E: Strong convergence of a general implicit algorithm for variational inequality problems and equilibrium problems and a continuous representation of nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc.40, 977-1001 (2014)

3. Hussain, N, Takahashi, W: Weak and strong convergence theorems for semigroups of mappings without continuity in Hilbert spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal.14(4), 769-783 (2013)

4. Hirano, N, Kido, K, Takahashi, W: Nonexpansive retractions and nonlinear ergodic theorems in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal.12, 1269-1281 (1988)

5. Kido, K, Takahashi, W: Mean ergodic theorems for semigroups of linear operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl.103, 387-394 (1984)

6. Saeidi, S: Existence of ergodic retractions for semigroups in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal.69, 3417-3422 (2008) 7. Saeidi, S: A note on ‘Approximation of fixed points for amenable semigroups of nonexpansive mappings in Banach

spaces’. Nonlinear Anal.72, 546-548 (2010)

8. Agarwal, RP, Oregan, D, Sahu, DR: Fixed Point Theory for Lipschitzian-Type Mappings with Applications. Topological Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications, vol. 6. Springer, New York (2009)

9. Shioji, N, Takahashi, W: Strong convergence of averaged approximants for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Approx. Theory97, 53-64 (1999)

10. Atsushiba, S, Takahashi, W: A nonlinear ergodic theorem for nonexpansive mappings with compact domain. Math. Jpn.52, 183-195 (2000)

10.1186/1687-1812-2014-238

References

Related documents

As little is known about the interplay between the characteristics of young men who engage in sex with teenage girls and the incidence of teenage pregnancy, this study aims to

The decreasing risk of first birth across younger cohorts of women who attended secondary and higher educational-level institutions, and the halt to the increasing risk among

On the other hand, critical theories approach the productive patterns encountered within intellectual commons as a proto-mode of production in germinal form,

Here, we propose a hypothesis on the origin of the complexity of chloroplast gene expression, encompassing recent data on factors involved in chloro- plast transcription, RNA

That Shannon´s formalism is a syntactic requirement for any semantic or pragmatic approach can be illustrated by the way Frege‟s theory of proper names (names

Other study costs were covered by Ribeirão Preto Nursing School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil and Intensive Care Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School,

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise

In this study, we demonstrated that (1) HMGB1 was translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and re- leased from neurons as early as 2 h after SAH associated with a