• No results found

Action Plan: Part I Karissa Otte

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Action Plan: Part I Karissa Otte"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Action Plan: Part I

Karissa Otte

Student-Learning Goal: By May 2016, students will improve their narrative writing performance in milestones ELA portion and achievement gaps between White, African American, and Students With Disabilities will narrow evidence by:

Students will show a 10% increase in writing narrative test scores on the milestones in grades 3-5.

 An overall increase of 10 percentage points in students meeting or exceeding standards on the ELA Georgia Milestones exam

 A 9% increase in the number of points earned when creating narrative responses on the Reading GA Milestones.

 A narrowing of the achievement gap between White and African-American students by 5 percentage points in the percentage of students who are proficient or advanced on the ELA Georgia Milestones exam

 An increase in the percentage of African-American students meeting or exceeding standards by 7 percentage points on the ELA Georgia Milestones exam

Research-based

Strategies Actions Person

Responsible/By When

Resources/

Budget

Expected Outcomes

Monitoring Tools/

Assessments:

Short-Term Medium-Term

Long-Term

Person(s) Responsible for

Monitoring/

By When Strategy 1:

Provide Lucy Calkins writing program across the curriculum.

a. Provide staff training on Lucy Calkins.

b. Professional development on how to

incorporate writing into other subject areas.

c. Teachers collaborate to

Lucy Calkins Cobb

Representative to train during pre- planning

(August)

Professional learning from the county monthly after school on Tuesday.

(Monthly)

Printed materials for training $50 (school based professional learning budget)

Books for teacher guidance

$500

(School based professional learning)

Resources for

Teacher will be able to

incorporate the Lucy Calkins model of writing into daily writing lessons and other curricular areas.

Teachers will be able to diagnose student

misunderstanding of the writing process and

Short Term Daily assignments

Common

assessments with writing

component

Student

explanations of the writing process Classroom

Classroom teachers will evaluate daily assignments, student explanations, common assessments, — ongoing

throughout the year

Teachers will work with students to self-

(2)

incorporate the program into an upcoming writing unit and design a common assessment and rubric

d. Teachers provide opportunities for students to work together complete the writing process.

e. Teachers incorporate writing in independent work

assignments, online simulations, and across the curriculum to reinforce writing.

f. Teachers provide opportunities for students to decipher

Teachers plan during common planning time on Mondays

(weekly)

Teachers to provide opportunities (daily, weekly)

Weekly

Weekly

classroom use

$50

(team budget)

Printing for common assessment--

$50—

(instructional budget for grade level)

modify instruction to increase

student

understandings of the writing process.

Teachers will be able to design differentiated assignments to help students increase their writing abilities

Students will be able to explain the steps in the

writing process

Students will be able to utilize writing strategies to correctly decipher how to answer narrative prompts.

Students will accurately self- assess their ability to answer writing prompts.

observations of instruction in writing

Teacher feedback (perceptual survey)

Medium Term Grade level writing exam practice

Review of teacher lesson plans

Review of student exemplars

Review of student written explanations narrative writing prompts

Long Term Georgia

Milestones ELA (overall and by domain)

SLO Pre and Post Assessments

assess and peer assess—ongoing through the year

Administrators will conduct classroom observations, administer surveys, and review lesson plans quarterly

Classroom teachers will administer Georgia

Milestones, SLOs and will review and post results for student in their classrooms annually or semi- annually

Teachers will review student writing

exemplars and will gather feedback from students quarterly

(3)

correct narrative responses to prompts.

Student feedback

Strategy 2:

Implement the data team process at the grade level to modify instruction to meet student needs in ELA

a)Train teachers in the data team process

b) Establish the roles, responsibilities, and decision making authority of the team

c)Develop common planning schedule for the school year

d)Determine meeting schedule for the year

e)Develop protocol for data team to use

f)Create technology structures to support electronic data

collection for common assessments

g) Teachers design and administer common pre-test to students h)Team scores pretest,

Academic coach will train in August

Principal will create master schedule to accommodate common planning and staff

development (ready for pre- planning)

Team to determine

meeting schedule (during pre- planning)

Principal and instructional lead teacher to

develop data team protocol (ready for August training)

Printed materials for training ($50) from picture money

Printing costs for data team

protocols ($150)

Teachers will be able to implement data teams with commitment to the process

Teachers will be able to design pre and post common assessments in a variety of formats

Teachers will identify student needs based on data and plan tiered instruction

Teachers will be able to identify and implement best practices for ELA

Teachers will increase

collaboration and will become more aligned with

Short term Data team logs and protocols

Pre and post test results for students

Observation of ELA teaching strategies in classrooms

Medium term Observation of team meetings focused on effectiveness indicators

Results of district benchmarks

Individual teacher assessments about data team work and implementation

Administrators will review team logs and

protocols monthly

Teachers and administrators will review results of post- test to determine growth

Administrators will observe teachers using the TKES method 6 times a year.

Administrators will sit in on team meetings once per quarter and review results of district benchmarks

(4)

analyzes results, and groups students into 3 categories based on a common rubric

i)Team plans instructional modifications to address identified needs and determines effectiveness indicators

j)Teachers implement agreed upon actions in their classrooms and instruct students

k)Post test administered by teachers

l)Team evaluates post test results and

determines growth of students using simple calculations, evaluates effectiveness of the actions/instructional modifications, and determines remedial interventions for students still not meeting standards

m)Team shares results with administration

TTIS will work on data collection and prepare for teacher training (ready for pre- planning)

Teachers implement and evaluate on a unit by unit basis throughout the year (steps g-n)

instruction in ELA

Students will receive instruction targeted to their specific

instructional need

Students will accelerate their learning in ELA

Students needing additional support will be identified early and

provided with additional interventions

of instructional practices

Review of lesson plans for

differentiation

Long Term Results of Georgia

Milestones and SLO exams (overall and by domain)

Teachers

complete yearly self-evaluation and meet with evaluating administrator

Teachers will review test scores for each

classroom to determine if one classroom is meeting

expectations at a higher rate to determine more effective

strategies.

Administrators will review lesson plans quarterly and provide feedback to teachers about differentiation of instruction for students

Team will review common

assessment and benchmark

(5)

along with plan to remediate students

n) Team implements remedial plan for underperforming students

o)Team repeats the cycle (steps g-n)

p)Team evaluates the effectiveness of the data team process for meeting student needs and makes

recommendations for continued

implementation

results for students participating in extended instruction opportunities to determine effectiveness of interventions

Teachers and administrators will review results of Milestones and SLOs

Parent &

Community Involvement:

Describe how you will communicate the action plan to parents and the larger community.

Include how you might involve them in its

implementation.

During Sneak a peek, a meeting will be held to discuss our future plans and to ask input about the program. Once input is received, the leaders will review and change the plan as needed. Next the final plan will be posted on the website and sent out to parents in a link. A blog for extra support in ELA will be provided and maintained by grade level teams. Conferences will include current student writing samples and ELA benchmarks to show parents how their student is achieving in ELA.

Lastly, the plan will be presented by the principal to school council and financial partners to gain support.

(6)

Field Experience Log/Reflection

Educational Leadership Department

Candidate:

Karissa Otte

Mentor/Title:

Mrs. Thomas/Principal

School/District:

Kemp Elementary School/Cobb County

Assignment:

Action Plan Part 1

Course:

ITEC 7305

Professor/Semester:

Dr. Jones/fall 2015

Date(s) Activity/Time PSC Standard, Element

&

BOR Strand, Element

&

NETS-A Standard, Element SAMPLE

12/2/15

Composed a school action plan SAMPLE

PSC 1.3, 2.2, 2.8; BOR 2, 4, 5 NETS-A 1,5

12/1/15 Reviewed current school data PSC 1.3, 2.2, 2.8; BOR 2, 4, 5

NETS-A 1,5 Total Hours: [5.5 hours ]

DIVERSITY

(Place an X in the box representing the ethnic population(s) involved in this field experience.)

Ethnicity P-12 Faculty/Staff P-12 Students

K-2 3-5 6-8 9-12 K-2 3-5 6-8 9-12

Race/Ethnicity:

Asian X X X X

Black X X X X

Hispanic X X X X

Native American/Alaskan Native X X X X

White X X X X

Multiracial X X X X

Subgroups:

Students with Disabilities X X

Limited English Proficiency X X

Eligible for Free/Reduced Meals X x

CANDIDATE REFLECTIONS:

What did you learn about leadership from completing this field experience? How did this learning relate to the knowledge, skills and dispositions required of an educational leader?

How did it enhance your ability to lead?

I learned through this experience that leading involves time and dedication to solving problems. A leader has to be willing to face problems head on and develop plans to help achieve that goal. I learned that I must know how to read data. A skill that I must have is the ability to effectively communicate my plan and have a clear program for teachers to follow. Also I must have a positive and excited disposition on the action plan to gain staff buy-in. This task forced me to sit down and think about our school’s needs, therefor I got more insight into what a leadership position actually entails.

Did (or could) this field experience impact student learning? If so, how?

Yes if the plan is carried out properly, teachers would begin to close the achievement gaps and raise test scores. Students will be taught new techniques for ELA and will learn how to apply them in a testing scenario. Overall student scores will rise if teachers embrace the plan.

(7)

How could this field experience be modified to make it more meaningful and relevant to aspiring educational leaders?

Provide more examples for strategies. I felt like the second strategy on the example was perfect, but feel bad for using some of it. With more guidance I feel like I could have developed another strategy on my own for my school.

References

Related documents

Data on hatchability and brooding performance of indigenous hens are presented in Table 8. The average hatchability percentage of eggs from local hens is 82.6, 78.9 and 89.1% in

With the restricted model we can see that, for men aged thirty whose highest quali…cation is not academic and who upgrade their quali…cations, there is a signi…cant return at

sapphire bracelet was $4,400 as of the applicable valuation date; i.e., the same fair market value that we find for the sapphire necklace listed as item 2d in the appendices.. We

By contrast, stochastic and robust optimization aim at providing a solution adapted to the uncertain framework considered.. The first one relies on probabilistic information,

To summarise, the dynSBM approach allows for exploring the following questions: i) Is there any high-level structure in the network, i.e. does dynSBM find more than a single group

Scala actors are deprecated, and since Hive is written in Scala and Akka, this could be a step towards building a Netlogo type agent based modeling platform with the support of a

implementation of program components were collected through individual interviews; focus group interviews; document review of materials provided to teachers; the Beginning