• No results found

A New Parameter For Ramanujan’s Function χ(q) Of Degree 3 And Their New Explicit Evaluations.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A New Parameter For Ramanujan’s Function χ(q) Of Degree 3 And Their New Explicit Evaluations."

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A New Parameter For Ramanujan’s Function

𝜒(𝑞)

Of Degree 3 And Their New Explicit

Evaluations.

S. Vasanth Kumar and M.R. Rajesh kanna

Abstract: In this article, We will come to know new modular identities of Ramanujan’s Remarkable product of theta-function

of degree 3 and their explicit values

Index Terms: Theta-function, Cubic continued fraction. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 33D10, 40A15,

11A55, 30B70.

————————————————————

1 INTRODUCTION

amanujan defined theta-function as

[2] f(a b) ∑n an(n )bn(n ) |ab|

a ab b ab ab ab (1.1)

Where(a q) ∏n aqn q .

[2] (q) f (q q) ∑ qn ( q q) (q q)

n (1.2)

[2] (q) f (q q ) ∑ qn n (q q )

(q q )

n (1.3)

[2] f( q) f ( q q ) ∑ qn n- (q q)

n - (1.4)

and

[2, Ch.16, Entry 22(iv), p.37] q q q (1.5)

A new parameter Im,n introduced by Nipen Saikia, which is

defined as

[6] m n (q) q

( m)

(qm)

q e √n m⁄ . (1.6)

He has listed as many as properties of Im,n. Recently we

noticed in [3, 4] have derived some new parameters for

Ramanujan’s function q of degree 5, degree 9 and their

explicit values.

In this article, we add as many as Modular identities and

explicit evaluation of I3,n for n = 2, 3, 5, 7.

We now first give brief explanation on a modular equation. The

ordinary hyper-geometric series is defined by

F (a b c x) ∑ a n b n

c n n xn

n

Where, (a)0=1,(a)n=a(a+1)(a+2)···(a+n−1) for any positive

integer n, and |x|<1.

Let u u(x) F ( x) (1.7)

[2] q q(x) exp( F( x)

F( x)

) (1.8)

Where 0 < x < 1. R

————————————————

Rajesh Kanna. M. R , Assistant Professor Dept of Mathematics, Sri D D Urs Government First Grade

College, Hunsur, India, PH-09448150508.

E-mail: [email protected]

Vasanth Kumar. S Research scholar, Dept of Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore- 641046, India / Dept of

Mathematics, Mysuru Royal Institute of Technology S.R.

Patna - 571606, PH-09945002174.

(2)

Let r to be a fixed natural number and holds good the

following relation:

r F( )

F( )

F ( )

F( )

(1.9)

The relation between and of modular equation of degree r

is induced by (1.9).

In the last section of my article, we have establish the modular

relation between I3,n and I3,k2n, also given explicit evaluations

of I3,n for n = 2,3,5 and 7.

2PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Lemma 2.1. [1] f P q ⁄ -q q and Q

q

( ) then

Q - P Q - . (2.1)

Lemma 2.2. [7] f P (q)

(q) and Q (q ) (q ) then

Q Q P Q Q P Q Q .

(2.2)

Lemma 2.3. f P (q)

(q) and Q (q ) (q ) then

P Q P-Q - P Q . (2.3)

Lemma 2.4. f P (q)

(q) and Q (q ) (q ) then

P Q - Q P P Q - Q P Q - Q P - Q

Lemma 2.5. f P (q)

(q) and Q (q ) (q ) then

P Q Q P P Q Q Q P

Q - Q P - P Q Q- Q P-Q (2.5)

Lemma 2.6.

[2] q q

f q (2.6)

Lemma 2.7.

[2] f (q) (q) ( q) (2.7)

Lemma 2.8.

f (q ) (q ) ( q ) (2.8)

Lemma 2.9. [6]

Im,1 =1. (2.9)

Lemma 2.10. [6]

Im,nIm,1/n= 1. (2.10)

3MODULAR IDENTITIES AND EXPLICIT EVALUATIONS OF IM,N

Theorem 3.1. If v q ⁄ q

q and p q

⁄ q

q then

p20v32+(16p16−p28+p4)v28+(71p12−25p24)v24

+(71p8−200p20+p32)v20+(16p4+16p28−550p16)v16

+(71p24−200p12+1)v12+(71p20−25p8)v8

+(p28+16p16−p4)v4+p12=0. (3.1)

Proof. Substitute q by q3 in (2.6), we arrive

q q

f q (3.2)

Cubing and dividing (2.6) by (3.2), we get

(q) (q)

(q) (q){

f (q)

f (q)} (3.3)

Using (2.7) and (2.8) in (3.3), we obtain

(q) (q)

(q) (q ){

( q)

( q)} (3.4)

Raising by four and multiplying by q on both side of (3.4),

we arrive at

q (q) (q )

(q) (q){q

( q )

( q)} (3.5)

By using lemma (2.1), we obtain

P Q

Q (3.6)

Using the equation (3.6) in (3.5), we obtain

v Q Q

Q (3.7)

Where, Q (q)

(q) and v q

q

q , the equation (3.7) can

be expressed as

Q ( v) √v v (3.8)

(3)

3630

Adopting the equation (3.8) in (2.2), we obtain (3.1).

This completes the proof.

Corollary 3.1. We have

{- √ √ - √ } ⁄

, (3.9)

⁄ { √ √ √ } ⁄

. (3.10)

{ √ √ √ } ⁄

, (3.11)

⁄ { √ √ √ } ⁄

. (3.12)

Proof. Considering the Theorem (3.1), substituting n =1/3 to it

and with the Lemma (2.10), we obtain

- . (3.13)

By solving (3.13), we arrive at (3.9) and (3.10) equations.

Substituting n in (3.1) and using (2.9), we get

{ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ }

{ ⁄ ⁄ }

(3.14)

Since one of the factor vanishes identically where as another

factor does not satisfies the condition I3,4<1, so (3.14) can be

written as

x x- where x - . (3.15)

By solving the (3.15), we arrive at (3.11) and (3.12) equations.

Theorem 3.2. If v q ⁄ q

q and p q ⁄ q

q then

p6v18+(p3−p15)v15 −10p12)v12−20v9p9

+(p18−10p6) v6 +(p15−p3)v3+p12 = 0. (3.16)

Proof. Adopting the equation (3.8) in (2.3), we obtain,

(v15p3−v3p3+p18v6−20v9p9+p6v18−10p6v6−v15p15−

10v12p12+v12+p12+v3p15)(v3p3−v15p3+p18v6+20v9p9

+p6v18+p12−10p6v6+v15p15−10v12p12+v12−v3p15)

(v36p12+p30v30+18p18v30−p6v30+62v24p24+v24+18

p30v18+200p18v18+18p6v18+p36v12+62v12p12−p30v6

+18p18v6 +p6v6+p24) = 0. (3.17)

Since q→ , one of the factors vanishes of the (3.17), but the

remaining factor does not disappear. So we come at the

equation (3.16). Thus it concludes the proof.

Corollary 3.2. We have

{ -√ } ⁄

, (3.18)

⁄ { √ } ⁄

. (3.19)

{ ⁄ } ⁄

, (3.20)

⁄ { ⁄ ⁄ } ⁄

. (3.21)

Proof. Considering Theorem (3.2), Lemma (2.10) and (2.9), we

arrive (3.18) - (3.21).

Theorem 3.3. If v q ⁄ q

q and p q ⁄ q

q then

v6−v5p5−vp−5v3p3+p6=0. (3.22)

Proof. Adopting the equation (3.8) in (2.4), we obtain

(−v5p5−vp+v6−5v3p3+p6)(v5p5+vp+v6+5v3p3+p6)(−5

p4v4−v7p−v11p5+v2p2−vp7+26p6v6+v12+p12+10v3p9−

5p8v8+p10v10+10v9p3−v5p11)(−5p4v4+v7p+v11p5+v2

p2+vp7+26p6v6+v12+p12−10v3p9−5p8v8+p10v10−10v9

p3+v5p11)(−10p4v4+v2p2+25p6v6+v12+p12−10p8v8+

p10v10)(v24−p10v22+p20v20+10p8v20+10p18v18+50p6

v18+75p16v16+10v16p4+230p14v14−v14p2+526v12p12−p2

2v10+230p10v10+10p20v8+75p8v8+50p18v6+10p6v6+10

p16v4+p4v4−p14v2+p24)(68884p36−85p48n+102p60

+3903p48+550383p24−p60n+p72 −183461p12n−

269297n+1615782p12−34442p24n−2602p36n) = 0. (3.23)

Where n √b b .

Since q→ , one of the factors vanishes of the (3.23), but the

remaining factor does not disappear. So we come at the

equation (3.22). Thus it concludes the proof.

Corollary 3.3. We have,

{ √ } ⁄

(4)

{ √ } ⁄

(3.25)

√ ( ) ( )

, (3.26)

⁄ ⁄ √ ( ⁄) ( )

. (3.27)

Proof. Considering Theorem (3.3), Lemma (2.10) and (2.9), we

obtain (3.24 )- (3.27).

Theorem 3.4. If v q ⁄ q

q and p q ⁄ q

q then

v8−v7p7−vp−7v6p2−7p6v2+14v4p4+p8=0. (3.28)

Proof. Adopting the equation (3.8) in (2.5), we obtain,

(v7p7+vp+v8−7v6p2−7p6v2+14v4p4+p8)(−v7p7−vp

+v8−7v6p2−7p6v2+14v4p4+p8)(84p10v6+28v5p5−vp9

+v16+7v9p13+148p8v8+v2p2−v15p7+7v14p2+84p6v10

+35p12v4+7p14v2+p14v14−v9p+7v13p9+28v11p11−v7

p15+p16+35v12p4+7v3p7+7v7p3)(84p10v6−28v5p5+v

p9+v16−7v9p13+148p8v8+v2p2+v15p7+7v14p2+84p6

v10+35p12v4+7p14v2+p14v14+v9p−7v13p9−28v11p11

+v7p15+p16+35v12p4−7v3p7−7v7p3)(210p10v6+v16

+294p8v8+v2p2+14v14p2+210p6v10+77p12v4+14p14v2

+p14v14+p16+77v12p4) −658p26v6−77p26v18−77p18v26

−30492p18v14−p18v2+588p10v10+p28v28+28p28v16−210

p20v24+18676p20v12+119p28v4+2695p8v24−210p8v12−

v18p2+v32+18676p12v20−210p24v20+2695p24v8+p32

−210p12v8−14v30p2−658v26p6−p14v30+36800p16v16+28

p16v28−77p14v6−30492p14v18−14p30v2−p30v14−77v14

p6+28v16p4+119v28p4+v4p4−8148p10v22+588p22v22

+28p16v4−8148p22v10)(128039644p24+3453190p48

+59823937+210156040p12+29964472p36+136p84+7516

p72+p96+216376p60−26269505n−5637p60n−p84n−1123

6677np24−119np72−135235np48−32009911p12n−1726595

p36n) = 0. (3.29)

Where n √b b

Since q→ , one of the factors vanishes of the (3.29), but the

remaining factor does not disappear. So we come at the

equation (3.28). Thus it concludes the proof.

Corollary 3.4.We have,

√ √ √

(3.30)

√ √ √ (3.31)

( ⁄) √ ( ) ( )

(3.32)

( ⁄) √ ( ) ( )

(3.33)

Proof. Considering Theorem (3.4), Lemma (2.10) and (2.9), we

obtain (3.30) - (3.33).

REFERENCES

[1] C. Adiga, Taekyun Kim, M. S. Mahadeva Naika and H. S. Madhusudhan On Ramanujan’s cubic continued fraction

and explicit evaluations of theta-function Indian. J. Pure

Appl. Math 35(9), 1047-1062 (2004).

[2] B C Berndt Ramanujan’s Notebooks Part

Springer-Verlag, New York (1991).

[3] Dharmendra B N A Parameter for Ramanujan’s function

q of degree and their explicit evaluation Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal, 69(4), 520–529 (2017).

[4] Dharmendra. B. N, Rajeshkanna. M. R and Vasanth Kumar S A Parameter for Ramanujan’s function q of

degree 9 and their explicit evaluation, International

Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 88(4), 537-546

(2013).

[5] Nayandeep Deka Baruah, Modular Equations for Ramanujan’s Cubic Continued Fraction Journal of

Mathematical Analysis and Applications 268, 244-255

(5)

3632 [6] Nipen Saikia A Parameter for Ramanujan’s function q

of degree 5 and their explicit values and applications,

Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Mathematics,

169050 (2012).

[7] K. R. Vasuki and Abdulrawf Abdulrahman Abdullah Kahtan, On certain theta function identities analogous to

Ramanujan’s P-Q Eta function identities, Applied

Mathemtics, 2, 874-882 (2011).

[8] J. Yi, Theta-function identities and the explicit formulas for theta-function and their applications, J. Math. Anal.

References

Related documents

The Project Description should represent a summary of the decisions made during the project development process (such as project needs analysis, target audience

To the best of this researcher ’ s knowledge, an overview of existing studies shows that the causality relationship between entrepreneurship and institutions only is noted by

Effect of drug: polymer ratio: Drug: polymer ratio had an effect on the production yield, actual drug content, encapsulation efficiency and size of microsponges with

held that, in a case of death on the high seas, a decedent’s survivors could not recover damages under general maritime law for their loss of society, reasoning that, since

ESCAPE ¼ Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion with Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times; EXTENDA-IA ¼ Extending the Time

Door to needle (DTN) time for thrombolysis in the Emergency Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (ED, UKMMC) is an indicator that can reduce mortality

using a prospective pre and post intervention design, while simultaneously Results: Median door- to-needle times lower in each Discussion: All four interventions associated

Methods/Design: NOR-TEST is a multi-centre PROBE (prospective randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint) trial designed to establish superiority of tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg (single