• No results found

Sample Treatment Protocol

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Sample Treatment Protocol"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Sample Treatment Protocol

Adults with acute episode of LBP

Perform and document a focused history and physical examination to include:

- Duration of symptoms

- Risk factors for potentially serious conditions (See the Diagnostic Work-Up Checklist ) - Symptoms suggesting radiculopathy or spinal stenosis

- Presence and severity of neurologic deficits - Psychosocial risk factors

- Employment status

Are any potentially specific conditions strongly suspected?

Perform the diagnostic studies to identify cause.

Document the diagnostic workup.

Back pain is mild with no substantial functional impairment?

Assess and document pain and functional status

N

Counsel the patient on the generally favorable prognosis of acute LBP (with or without radiculopathy). Review indications for reassessment with the patient including worsening of symptoms, failure to improve after 1 month and diagnostic testing (see boxes 3 & 4). Provide The Back Book and review self care options such as superficial heat. Patients should be advised to continue usual activities as much as possible and specifically advised against bed rest.

Counsel the patient on the generally favorable prognosis of acute LBP (with or without radiculopathy).

Provide The Back Book and review self care options such as superficial heat and advice against bed rest.

Shared decision-making should be used to determine the right treatment option among non-invasive pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies.

Clinicians to document reasons for using non-first-line treatment options and non-recommended therapies.

N

Patient accepts risks and benefit of chosen therapy?

Patient to try self care. Reassess in 1 month.

N

Initiate time limited trial of chosen therapy.

Y

Follow-up within 4 weeks unless symptoms completely resolve 1

2

4

12

13 14

15

16 18

Go to Box 20 to continue flow.

Y

Repeat Box 2 with any worsening of symptom severity, or every 3-6 months with stable symptoms

Patients with significant psychosocial issues require appropriate treatment or referral

See

“Diagnostic Work-Up Checklist.doc”

See “Interventions.doc”

3

Evaluation suggests cancer, vertebral infection, cauda equina syndrome, vetebral compression fracture, ankylosing spondylitis, or degenerative scoliosis Evaluation suggests herniated disc or spinal stenosis, but no other specific causes

Significant neurologic deficit?

These patients are excluded from the remainder of the protocol.

Consider consultation

Go to Box 12

Y

Y

5

6

10 11

17 19

Definition: Acute episode Back pain lasting <4 weeks for new episode or as acute exacerbation for chronic low back pain patients

Exclusions (See Box 11 also)

● Patients with previous low back surgery

● Pregnant women

● Children

Protocol adapted from Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society, Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478-49

Document pain and functional status 3 months after completion of care.

Severe radicular pain?

N

N Go to Box 27 Y

7 9

8

(2)

Back pain and/or radiculopathy resolved or improved with no significant functional deficits?

Continue therapy and reassess in 1 month.

Y

Signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis?

N

Employ shared decision-making regarding having a MRI for LBP

Perform MRI if the patient is a candidate for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for herniated disc) Y

Significant (concordant) nerve root impingement or spinal stenosis present on MRI?

Employ shared decision-making regarding surgery to determine patient interest in referral for possible surgery.

Also discuss the possibility of epidural steroid injection (if herniated disk) with patients as a treatment option.

Y

Reassess symptoms and risk factors and reevaluate diagnosis. See Boxes 2-11.

Consider imaging studies.

Shared decision-making should be employed prior to MRI or CT scans.

N

N

Employ shared decision-making to consider alternative pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions.

For patients experiencing loss of function, consider more intensive multidisciplinary approach or referral.

Return to Box 20

21 22

23 24

25 26

29

30

Assess response to treatment.

Document pain and functional status.

20

For failed back surgery syndrome with persistent radicular symptoms:

Discuss risks/benefits of spinal cord stimulation using a shared decision- making framework.

For patients experiencing persistent, disabling non-radicular pain for >1 year that have not responded to multiple attempts at non-invasive therapies:

Discuss risks/benefits of surgery using a shared-decision-making framework

Facet joint steroid injection, intradiscal steroid injection, and prolotherapy are not recommended.

Patients should only be referred for consideration of radiofrequency denervation, or sacroiliac joint steroid injection if clinicians can document that they have persistent and at least moderately severe symptoms, have failed at least 3 recommended treatments, and are counseled on substantial uncertainties regarding potential benefits and harms.

Use of other non-recommended therapies must be documented and explained.

See “Interventions.doc”

Protocol adapted from Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society, Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478-49

For patients who get surgery or ESI, pain and function status should be documented:

● Within 2-4 weeks of ESI

● Within 4-6 weeks of surgery

● 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively Patient interested in referral to surgery or ESI?

Go to Box 30 No

Yes

Document pain and functional status 3 months after completion of care.

27 Document pain and functional status 3 months after completion of care.

28

(3)

Diagnostic Work-Up Checklist

Possible Cause Key features on history or physical examination

Imaging Additional Studies Cancer History of cancer* with new onset of

LBP

(*Not including non-melanoma skin cancers)

X-ray or MRI

ESR Unexplained weight loss Lumbosacral

x-ray Failure to improve after 1 month

Age >50 years with new or changed low back pain

Multiple risk factors present X-ray or MRI Vertebral

infection

Fever MRI ESR and/or

CRP Intravenous drug use

Recent infection Cauda

equina syndrome

Urinary retention MRI None

Motor deficits at multiple levels Fecal incontinence

Saddle anesthesia Vertebral

compression fracture

History of osteoporosis Consider Lumbosacral x-ray

None Use of corticosteroids

Older age (>65 years, women; >75 years, men)

Ankylosing spondylitis

Symptoms for > 3 months Consider Anterior posterior pelvis x- ray, if multiple features present

HLA-B27 Morning stiffness

Improvement with exercise Alternating buttock pain

Awakening due to back pain during the second part of the night

Younger age (20-30s) Male

Severe/

progressive neurologic deficits

Progressive motor weakness MRI Consider

EMG/NCV

Herniated disc

Back pain with leg pain in an L4, L5, or S1 nerve root distribution

If symptoms present for < 1 month: None

Symptoms present >1 month, consider:

MRI

If symptoms present for < 1 month: None

Symptoms present >1 month, consider:

EMG/NCV Positive straight-leg-raise test or

crossed straight-leg-raise test

Spinal stenosis

Radiating leg pain If symptoms

present for < 1 month: None Symptoms

If symptoms present for < 1 month: None Symptoms Older age (>65 years, women; >75

years, men)

Pseudoclaudication

1

1

Painful cramps that are not caused by peripheral artery disease but rather by spinal, neurologic, or orthopedic disorders, such as spinal stenosis, diabetic neuropathy, or arthritis. Mosby’s Medical Dictionary, 8

th

. Elsevier, 2009. Print

(Note: Weak

predictor)

(4)

present >1 month, consider:

MRI

present >1 month, consider:

EMG/NCV

(5)

Interventions Table

Interventions supported by grade B evidence (at least fair-quality evidence of moderate benefit, or small benefit but no significant harms, costs, or burdens). No intervention was supported by grade A evidence (good-quality evidence of substantial benefit)

○ First-line therapy ● Second-line therapy Low Back Pain (Duration)

Acute (<4 Weeks)

Subacute or Chronic (>4 Weeks)

Self-care Advice to remain active ○ ○

Books, handout ○ ○

Application of superficial heat ○ Pharmacologic

therapy

Acetaminophen ○ ○

NSAIDs ○ ○

Skeletal muscle relaxants ●

Antidepressants (TCA) ●

Benzodiazepines ● ●

Tramadol, opioids ● ●

Surgery Decompressive laminectomy for symptomatic spinal stenosis*

○ Discectomy for herniated disc with

radiculopathy*

○ Fusion for non-radicular low back pain

with common degenerative changes*

^Consider interdisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with significant functional impairment or risk factors for chronic disabling low back pain

*A shared decision-making approach is recommended when considering these interventions Nonpharmacologic

therapy

Spinal manipulation ● ●

Exercise therapy ●

Acupuncture ●

Yoga ●

Cognitive-behavioral therapy ●

Progressive relaxation ●

Interdisciplinary rehabilitation^ ○ / ● Injections Epidural steroid injection for

radiculopathy with herniated disc*

(6)

Adapted from the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society, Ann Intern Med.

2007;147:478-49.

References

Related documents

Relational Database Management Systems (RDMS) as the one referred to above, do more than store and collect information: it offers mechanisms capable of controlling

This study focused on making connections between central constructs outlined in the new model (general personality dysfunction and specific maladaptive personality traits)

Confessions and dying declarations recorded by magistrate constitute valuable evidence as they may form the basis of conviction of the accused. Although there is no hard and fast

The DICE model is used to illustrate the relevance of the inter-temporal elasticity of substitution, the discount rate and the modelling of technological progress for the optimal

Such an approach is aimed at: (i) allowing fl exible tasks modeling so that users can create ad-hoc processes for describing how to accomplish tasks in different Web sites; (ii)

Table 16: Parliamentarian position characteristics of the 21 Catalan parliamentarians with highest in-degree (following), retweet and mentions network centrality in

The vehicle fleets category pools public health &amp; environmental goals as one of the measures foreseen in the Action Plan for Improving Air Quality in the Barcelona