• No results found

affine connection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "affine connection"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

affine connection

Marta Teofilova, Georgi Zlatanov

Abstract. Odd-dimensional spaces endowed with a symmetric affine con- nection and an additional tensor structure are studied. The structure under consideration is defined by the directional vector fields of a given net. Equiaffine and Riemannian subspaces containing such structures are characterized. A connection with torsion which preserves by parallel trans- lation the additional structure is defined and studied.

M.S.C. 2010: 53B05, 53B99.

Key words: affine connection; net; Weyl space; transformations of connections.

1 Introduction

Spaces with symmetric affine connections, Weyl spaces and Riemannian spaces with additional tensor structures: almost product, almost paracontact and almost contact are studied in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12].

By help of n independent vector fields, in [13, 14, 15], an apparatus for the study of spaces with a symmetric affine connection and special compositions or nets is constructed. This apparatus is applied to the study of triples of compositions in [2]

and almost paracontact and almost contact structures in [10].

In the present work, by help of the same apparatus, we study special odd-dimensional spaces endowed with a symmetric affine connection and a covariantly constant affi- nor. This affinor is defined by 2n independent vector fields and their reciprocal covectors. The obtained results are applied to equiaffine and Riemannian spaces.

A non-symmetric affine connection which preserves by covariant differentiation the considered affinor structure is defined and studied.

2 Preliminaries

Let A2n+1be a space endowed with a symmetric affine connection∇. The Christoffel symbols of∇ are denoted by Γναβ. Also, let us introduce the following notations (2.1) α, β, γ, σ, ν, δ, τ = 1, 2, ..., 2n + 1, α1, α2, ..., α2n+1= 1, 2, ..., 2n + 1;

β1, β2, ..., β2n+1 = 1, 2, ..., 2n + 1, i, j, k, s = 1, 2, ..., 2n.

D

ifferential Geometry - Dynamical Systems, Vol.18, 2016, pp. 132-138.

⃝ Balkan Society of Geometers, Geometry Balkan Press 2016.c

(2)

Let v

α

β be independent vector fields. The net defined by v

α

β is denoted by{v

α}. The reciprocal covector fieldsαvβ of the vector fields v

α

β are determined by

(2.2) v

α

β νvβ= δνα ⇐⇒ v

β

ν βvα= δνα, where δαν is the identity affinor.

Let {

vα

}

be the coordinate net. Then we have [13, 14]:

(2.3)

v1

α(1, 0, 0, ..., 0) , v

2

α(0, 1, 0, ..., 0) , ..., vα

2n+1(0, 0, ..., 0, 1) ; v1α(1, 0, 0, ..., 0) ,v2α(0, 1, 0, ..., 0) , ...,2n+1vα (0, 0, ..., 0, 1) .

In addition to the usual coordinates xα(α = 1, 2, ..., 2n+1), in A2n+1we introduce coordinates with respect to the coordinate net{v

α} which will be denoted byαu. Then, for an arbitrary vector field vαwe have vα(u,1 u, ...,2 2n+1u ).

The following derivative equations are known to be valid [15]:

(2.4) σ v

α β=

ν

Tασ v

ν

β, σ

αvβ=−Tα

νσ

vνβ.

In accordance to [14, 15], in the parameters of the coordinate net we have (2.5)

β

Tασ= Γβσα.

In the space A2n+1, we consider a composition Xp× Xq of two basic manifolds Xp and Xq (p + q = 2n + 1), i.e. their topological product. Two positions (tangent spaces) denoted by P (Xp) and P (Xq) pass thought each point of the space A2n+1 [6, 7]. According to [6], the coordinatesαu are adapted to the composition Xp× Xq.

It is known that a composition is completely defined by the affinor field aβα, satis- fying the condition aβαaνβ= δαν [6].

The integrability condition of aβα is given by aσβ aνσ]− aσα aνσ]= 0 [6, 7].

Let us consider the following affinor

(2.6) aβα= v

i

β ivα− vβ

2n+1 2n+1vα .

By (2.2) and (2.6) it follows that aβαaνβ = δαν. Hence the affinor (2.6) defines a composition X2n× X1. The projecting affinors are given by: 2naβα= v

i

β ivα anda1βα = vβ

2n+1

2n+1vα [13, 14]. Obviously, v

i

α∈ P (X2n) and vα

2n+1∈ P (X1).

The composition X2n× X1is of the type (c,c) if the positions P (X2n) and P (X1) are translated parallelly along any line in the space A2n+1 [7]. According to [7], the composition X2n× X1 is of the type (c,c) if and only if in the adapted coordinates the following conditions are valid:

(2.7) Γ2n+1σi = Γiσ2n+1= 0.

(3)

3 Spaces A

2n+1

with additional affinor structures

Let A2n+1 be a space with a asymmetric affine connection. Let us consider the following affinor

(3.1) Aβα= v

1

β 2vα+ v

2

β 3vα+ ... + vβ

2n−1

v2nα+ vβ

2n 1vα. The equalities (2.1) and (3.1) yield

Aαβ1Aαα2

1Aαα3

2...Aνα

2n−1 = δβν− vν

2n+1

2n+1vα , Aβα vα

2n+1= 0, Aβα2n+1vβ = 0.

According to (2.2), (2.3) and (3.1), in the parameters of the coordinate net{vα}, the 2n× 2n real matrix (Aβα) is given by

(3.2) (Aβα) =









0 0 0 ... 0 1 0 1 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 1 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 1 ... 0 0 0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 0 0 0 ... 1 0 0







 .

We prove the following Theorem 3.1. The condition

(3.3) σAβα= 0

holds if and only if the coefficients of the derivative equations (2.4) satisfy

(3.4)

1

T1σ=

2

T2σ=

3

T3σ = ... =

2n 2nTσ,

i

Tσ 2n+1

=

2n+1

Tσ i

= 0,

1 2nTσ =

2

T1σ=

3

T2σ= ... =

2n

Tσ 2n−1,

2

T

2nσ =

3

T

1σ=

4

T

2σ= ... =

2n

Tσ

2n−2=

1

Tσ

2n−1,

3 2nTσ =

4

T1σ=

5

T2σ= ... =

2n

Tσ 2n−3=

2

Tσ 2n−1=

1

Tσ 2n−2,

4

T

2nσ =

5

T

1σ=

6

T

2σ= ... =

2n

Tσ

2n−3=

3

Tσ

2n−1=

2

Tσ

2n−2=

1

Tσ

2n−3, . . . .

2n−1

Tσ 2n

=

2n

T1σ=

1

T2σ=

2

T3σ= ... =

2n−2

Tσ 2n−1.

Proof. According to (2.4) and (3.1), equality (3.3) takes the form

(3.5)

ν

T

1σv

ν

β 2vα−T2

νσv

1 β νvα+

ν

T

2σv

ν

β 3vα−T3

νσv

2

β νvα+ ...+

+

ν

Tσ

2n−1v

ν

β 2nvα2nT

νσ vβ

2n−1

vνα+

ν

T

2nσv

ν

β 1vα−T1

νσv

2n

β νvα= 0.

(4)

The independence of the covector fields νvα implies that (3.5) is equivalent to the following equalities:

(3.6)

ν 2nTσv

ν β−T1

1σv

2n β−T2

1σv

1 β−T3

1σv

2 β−T4

1σv

3

β− ... −2nT

1σ vβ

2n−1= 0,

ν

T1σv

ν β−T1

2σv

2n β−T2

2σv

1 β−T3

2σv

2 β−T4

2σv

3

β− ... −2nT

2σ vβ

2n−1= 0,

ν

T

2σv

ν β−T1

3σv

2n β−T2

3σv

1 β−T3

3σv

2 β−T4

3σv

3

β− ... −2nT

3σ vβ

2n−1= 0, . . . .

ν

Tσ 2n−1v

ν β−T1

2nσv

2n β−T2

2nσv

1 β−T3

2nσv

2 β−T4

2nσv

3

β− ... −2nT

2nσ vβ

2n−1= 0,

2

Tσ

2n+1

v1 β+

3

Tσ

2n+1

v2 β+

4

Tσ

2n+1

v3

β+ ... +

2n

Tσ

2n+1

vβ

2n−1+

1

Tσ

2n+1 2nv

β= 0.

Since the vector fields v

ν

αare independent, equalities (3.6) are equivalent to conditions

(3.4) which proves the statement. 

Let us introduce the following notations: Γ1σ2n=φ1σ, Γ2σ2n=φ2σ, ..., Γ2nσ2n−1=2nφ−1σ , Γ1σ1= φσ.

Corollary 3.2. Equality (3.3) holds if and only if in the parameters of the coordinate net{v

α} the Christoffel symbols satisfy

(3.7)

Γ1σ1= Γ2σ2= ... = Γ2nσ2n= φσ; Γiσ2n+1= Γ2n+1σi = 0, Γ1σ2n= Γ2σ1= Γ3σ2= ... = Γ2nσ2n−1=φ1σ,

Γ2σ2n= Γ3σ1= Γ4σ2= ... = Γ2nσ2n−2= Γ1σ2n−1=φ2σ,

Γ3σ2n= Γ4σ1= Γ5σ2= ... = Γ2nσ2n−3= Γ2σ2n−1= Γ1σ2n−2=φ3σ,

Γ4σ2n= Γ5σ1= Γ6σ2= ... = Γ2nσ2n−4= Γ3σ2n−1= Γ2σ2n−2= Γ1σ2n−3=φ4σ, . . . .

Γ2nσ2n−1= Γ2nσ1= Γ1σ2= Γ2σ3= ... = Γ2nσ2n−2−1=2nφ−1σ . Proof. In the parameters of the coordinate net{v

α} equality (2.5) holds which implies

the equivalence of (3.4) and (3.7). 

Corollary 3.3. If (3.3) holds, the composition X2n× X1defined by the affinor (2.6) is of the type (c,c).

Proof. By (3.3) and Corollary 3.2 it follows that in the parameters of the coordinate net{v

α} equalities (2.7) hold true. According to [7], equalities (2.7) imply that the

composition X2n× X1 is of the type (c,c). 

(5)

Example 1. Let A2n+1 be an equiaffine space with main n-vector eβ1β2...β2n+1. In the parameters of the coordinate net{v

α}, the main density of A2n+1 is denoted by e = e12...2n+1. According to [8], the space A2n+1 is equaffine if and only if

(3.8) Γασα= ∂σln e.

Let (3.3) be valid. Equalities (3.7) and (3.8) imply

(3.9)

Γ1i1= Γ2i2= ... = Γ2ni2n=2n1iln e, Γ2n+12n+1,2n+1= ∂2n+1ln e, Γiσ2n+1= Γ2n+1σi = 0,

φ1=φ12=φ23=φ34= ... =φ2n2n−3−2 =φ2n2n−2−1 =2nφ2n−1= 2n1 1ln e, φ2=φ13=φ24=φ35= ... =φ2n2n−3−1 =2nφ2n−2=2nφ−11 =2n12ln e, φ3=φ14=φ25=φ36= ... =2nφ2n−3=2nφ−21 =2nφ−12 = 2n1 3ln e, . . . .

φ2n=φ11=φ22=φ33= ... =φ2n2n−3−3=φ2n2n−2−2=φ2n2n−1−1= 2n1 2nln e.

By (3.9) for the Ricci tensor we have R2n+1,2n+1= 0, Ri2n+1=−∂i(∂2n+1e).

Example 2. Let A2n+1 be a Riemannian space with metric tensor gαβ and Levi- Civita connection∇ with Christoffel symbols Γναβ. Let (3.3) be valid. By (3.7) and

2n+1gij =ig2n+1,2n+1= 0 it follows that in parameters in the coordinate net{v

α} (3.10) gij = gij(u),s g2n+1,2n+1= g2n+1,2n+1(2n+1u ).

According to [8], we have

(3.11) Γασα= ∂σln√

|g| = ∂ ln

|g|

σu , where g is the determinant of (gαβ).

Let in the parameters of the coordinate net

(3.12) gαβ= 0, α̸= β; gij ̸= 0, i ̸= j; g2n+1,2n+1> 0.

Because of (3.11) and (3.12) equalities (3.7) take the form

(3.13)

Γ111=2n1 1ln√

|g|, Γ222= 2n1 2ln√

|g|, ..., Γ2n2n,2n= 2n1 2nln√

|g|, Γ2n+12n+1,2n+1= ∂2n+1ln√

|g|.

By (3.10), (3.12) and (3.13) we get

(3.14) gii = ef (

u)s

εii, g2n+1,2n+1= F (2n+1u ),

where εii =±1, and f(u) and F (s 2n+1u ) are arbitrary functions. According to (3.12) and (3.14), the line element of the space is given by

ds2= ef (u)s 11(du)1 2+ ε22(du)2 2+ ... + ε2n,2n(d2nu )2) + F (2n+1u )(d2n+1u )2.

(6)

4 Transformations of connections in A

2n+1

Let A2n+1be a space with a symmetric affine connection endowed with the additional structure defined by (3.1) and satisfying (3.3). Let us consider the following covector field

wα=

2n+1

β=1 βvα.

In the parameters of the coordinate net{v

α}, according to (2.3), we have wα(1, 1, ..., 1).

We consider the connection1∇ with Christoffel symbols1Γναβ defined by

1Γναβ= Γναβ+ Tαβν , where the deformation tensor Tαβν is given by

(4.1) Tαβν = wαAνβ.

Let the indices i, j∈ {1, 2, ..., 2n} whenever ¯i, ¯j ∈ {2, 3, ..., 2n, 1}. Because of (3.2) and (3.7), in the parameters of the coordinate net we have

A¯ii= 1; Aij= 0, ¯i̸= j; A2n+1α = Aα2n+1 = 0;

Tα¯ii=1Γiα¯i− Γiα¯i= wα; Tαji =1Γiαj− Γiαj= 0, j̸= ¯i;

Tαβ2n+1 =1Γ2n+1αβ = 0; Tα,2n+1β =1Γβα,2n+1= 0.

According to (4.1) and 1σAνα =σAνα+ Tσρν Aρα− Tσαρ Aνρ, we obtain1σAνα =

σAνα, i.e. the affinor σAνα is invariant under the transformation of ∇ into 1∇.

Thus,1σAνα= 0 if and only ifσAνα= 0.

Let Rαβσ.ν and 1Rαβσ.ν be the curvature tensors of∇ and 1∇, respectively. Then the following relation is well-known

(4.2) 1Rαβσ.ν = Rαβσ.ν +αTβσν − ∇βTασν + Tαδν Tβσδ − Tβδν Tασδ . By (4.2) and (4.1) we obtain

(4.3) 1Rαβσ.ν = Rαβσ.ν + 2wβ]Aνσ. In the parameters of the coordinate net, by (4.3) we have

(4.4) 1Rαβj.i= Rαβj.i, j ̸= ¯i, 1Rαβ¯i.i= Rαβ¯i.i+wβ]. The second of the equalities (4.4) implies

1Rαβ¯i.i1Rαβ¯j.j = Rαβ¯i.i− Rαβ¯j.j.

Acknowledgements. This work is partially supported by project NI15–FMI–004 of the Scientific Research Fund, University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

(7)

References

[1] T. Adati and T. Miyazawa, On paracontact Riemannian manifolds, TRU Math.

13(2) (1977), 27-39.

[2] M. Ajeti, M. Teofilova and G. Zlatanov, Triads of compositions in an even–

dimensional space with a symmetric affine connection, Tensor, N.S. 73(3) (2011), 171-187.

[3] D. Blair, Riemannian Geometry of Contact and Symplectic Manifolds, Prog. in Math. 203, Birkh¨auser, Boston 2002.

[4] S. Kaneyuki and F. L.Williams, Almost paracontact and parahodge structures on manifolds, Nagoya Math. J. 99 (1985), 173-187.

[5] S. Kaneyuki and M. Kozai, Paracomplex structures and affine symmetric spaces, Tokyo J. Math. 8(1) (1985), 81-98.

[6] A. P. Norden, Spaces of Cartesian composition (in Russian), Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn.

Zaved. Math. 4 (1963), 117-128.

[7] A. P. Norden and G. N. Timofeev, Invariant criteria for special compositions of multidimensional spaces (in Russian), Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 8 (1972), 81-89.

[8] A. P. Norden, Spaces of Affine Connections (in Russian), Nauka GRFML, Moscow, 1987.

[9] G. N. Timofeev, Invariant characteristics of special compositions in Weyl spaces (in Russian), Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Math. 1 (1976), 87-99.

[10] M. Teofilova and G. Zlatanov, Odd-dimensional Riemannian spaces with almost contact and almost paracontact structures, Adv. Math. Sci. J. 2 (2013), 25-33.

[11] M. Teofilova and G. Zlatanov, Special spaces with a symmetric affine connection, Tensor, N. S. 75(2) (2014), 154165.

[12] S. Sasaki, On paracontact Riemannian manifolds, TRU Math. 16(2) (1980), 75- 86.

[13] I. Sato, On a structure similar to the almost contact structure, Tensor 30(3) (1976), 219-224.

[14] G. Zlatanov, Compositions generated by special nets in affinely connected spaces, Serdica Math. J. 28 (2002), 1001-1012.

[15] G. Zlatanov, Special compositions in affinely connected spaces without a torsion, Serdica, Math. J. 37 (2011), 211-220.

[16] G. Zlatanov and B. Tsareva, Geometry of the nets in equaffine spaces, J. Geom.

55 (1996), 192-201.

Authors’ address:

Marta Teofilova and Georgi Zlatanov Department of Algebra and Geometry,

Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Plovdiv University, 236 Bd. Bulgaria, 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected]

References

Related documents

benzaldehyde. Thereafter, the so-called Grignard reagents have become very popular nucleophilic reagents. In particular, these reagents are characterized by their convenient

We also noted that several proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1 ␤ , IL-6, and IL-8, were present at high levels in cervical mucus, with median concentrations 2 to 3 orders of

Overall, 5002 P or piggyBac lines were added to the collection be- cause their insertions were located in novel genes (3439), in putative regulatory regions, or because they were

The dielectric constant of five igneous rock samples are Rhyolite, Granite, Tholeiite Basalt, Dolerite Dyke and Ferro Basalt have been measured at three different microwave

The contemporary man has not been able to fully realize his potential because the old structures, which bound and limited the scope of his negative freedom, at the same time

A model is needed that can analyze the conditions and suitability of dry land with suitable crops for cultivation.It also can give the recommended crops to

Conclusion: This study showed that air traffic control workers with various shift did not have any disturbances in their biochemical blood factors, and this finding persisted after

Figure 10 shows the differences between the actual query execution times (QE Time) against the estimates obtained using the model generated with and without the join