• No results found

Linear Arrays of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antennas: Analysis & Performance Assessment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Linear Arrays of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antennas: Analysis & Performance Assessment"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Linear Arrays of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antennas: Analysis & Performance Assessment

Lalit Kaushal Research Scholar, ECE

B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, India

Ritesh K Mishra

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering N. I. T. Patna, Patna, India

Abstract- This paper provides an insight into the design aspects of rectangular microstrip patch (RMP) antenna & its linear arrays and performance assessment is made in terms of bandwidth, directivity and gain by using different dielectric substrate materials. For enhancing the bandwidth, directivity and gain, 2x1 and 4x1 RMP antenna arrays are designed by placing same RMP antenna in linear configuration and utilizing power divider circuits. Performance assessment is made by comparing simulated results of RMP antenna and its linear array.

Keywords – Rectangular microstrip patch (RMP) antenna, RMP antenna array, CST & HFSS I. INTRODUCTION

Antenna plays an important role in the field of communication. In wireless technology, there are many numbers of antennas but a microstrip antenna is the most popular antenna due to low profile, light weight, low cost, versatility, easy integration in MMIC’s and other exceptional features. A Microstrip antenna array is very versatile antenna. It could be used to synthesize required radiation pattern and scanning the beam of the antenna array. The performance of a microstrip patch antenna and array antenna strongly depends on several factors such as type of substrate, feeding technique, the thickness of dielectric and dielectric constant of substrate respectively. But it has few drawbacks like narrow bandwidth, less gain and broad beam width. To increase the bandwidth, directivity and gain, the most common method is using multi-elements which are known as array. Selection of dielectric substrate materials and their thickness are the main parameters in terms of size and compactness a RMP antenna. Compactness comes with a trade-off in bandwidth, directivity and gain.

Objectives of this work are (i) Design and performance analysis of a rectangular microstrip patch antenna for different dielectric constants (

H

r)

ii. Design and performance analysis of a rectangular microstrip patch antenna and 2x1, 4x1 rectangular microstrip patch antenna array for WLAN.

II. DESIGN ANALYSIS & PERFORMANCE ASSESMENT OF A RMP ANTENNA ( DIFFERENT DIELECTRIC MATERIALS) The designed RMP antenna structure is shown in fig. 1. The calculated parameters are Dielectric constant

H

r = 4.4 (FR-4 epoxy), Resonant frequency = 2.4GHz, Substrate thickness, h = 1.58mm, Effective dielectric constant, = 3.91, Patch width = 38.01mm, Patch length = 28.77mm, Width of 50ȍ transmission line = 5.93mm, Length of inset feed = 15.80mm, Inset depth = 9.23mm, Notch width g =1.51mm.

In a RMP antenna, when the dielectric materials of substrate varies then the physical dimensional parameters and other parameters are also changed as in table 1. The simulated results using HFSS (High Frequency Structural Simulator) are also given below in figs. 2-4.

(2)

Patch length (Lp) 28.77mm 35.08mm 40.35mm

Feed width (Wf) 5.93mm 7.90mm 9.55mm

Feed length (Lf) 15.80mm 19.06mm 21.79mm

Inset feed length (y0) 10.87mm 11.29mm 11.96mm

Figure 1. A RMP Antenna Figure 2.

S

11Plot of RMP Antenna for

H

r=4.4

S1 1Plot for a RMP antenna for different dielectric substrate with same thickness have different characteristics for different thickness. S-Parameter plot is given for microstrip patch antenna for dielectric constant=4.4 (FR4- epoxy). Here Return Loss is -32.11dB and BW is 3.75%. S-Parameter plot is given for microstrip patch antenna for dielectric constant=2.94(Rogers RT/duroid 6002). Here Return Loss is -26.40dB and BW is 2.33%. S-Parameter plot is given for RMP antenna for dielectric constant=2.2(Rogers RT/duroid 5880). Here Return Loss is -20.42dB and BW is 2.08%.

(3)

Figure 3.

S

11Plot of RMP Antenna for

H

r=2.94 Figure 4.

S

11Plot of RMP Antenna for

H

r=2.2

III. DESIGN ANALYSIS & PERFORMANCE ASSESMENT OF A2×1RMP ANTENNA ARRAY

The 2x1 rectangular microstrip patch antenna array is designed using HFSS by placing same microstrip antenna in linear configuration. The power divider technique for feeding is used in 2x1 antenna array. Using this technique the power goes to equal in every antenna element. The designed RMP antenna array structure is shown in fig. 5.

Dimensional Parameters of designed Antenna Array is given in table 2.

Table 2 Dimensional Parameters of designed 2×1 RMP Antenna Array

Figure 5. 2×1 Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array

A. Power divider for 2×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

The use of 3-port power divider is especially important for an antenna array system that utilizes a power-splitting network, such a parallel or corporate feed system. The corporate feed is simply a device that splits power between n outputs ports with a certain distribution while maintaining equal path lengths from input to output ports. Here we used the power divider circuit for 2x1 antenna array. Power divider makes using the microstrip lines of different resistances due to impedance matching. Since single microstrip patch antenna has 50ohm input impedance, 2x1

Parameter Value Dielectric constant,

H

r 4.4

Resonant frequency,

f

r 2.4GHz

Substrate thickness, h 1.58mm Effective dielectric constant,

H

reff 3.91

Patch width, Wp 38.01mm

Patch length Lp 28.77mm

Width of 50: transmission line

Wf

5.93mm

Length of inset feed Lf 15.80mm

Inset depth

y

0 9.23mm

Notch width g 1.51mm

(4)

Figure 6. Power divider for 2×1 RMP Antenna Array

B. S Parameter for Power divider (2×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array) –

S Parameter of Power Divider for 2X1 antenna array shows the return loss on port 1. Return loss value is

S

11 = - 23.07dB at 2.4GHz as shown in fig. 7.

Figure 7. S Parameter for Power divider Figure 8. S Parameter for 2×1 RMP Antenna Array

C. S11 Plot for 2×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

The

S

11plot of the designed 2x1 microstrip patch antenna array is shown in figure 8. The bandwidth of patch antenna is determined by the return loss graph. The bandwidth of patch antenna is the frequency range over which return loss or

S

11= -10dB. The Return loss and Bandwidth of 2x1 antenna array is

S

11= -16.91dB and BW=4.17%.

D. Gain and Directivity for 2×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

The designed antenna array radiates in broadside direction with gain of 6.50dB and the directivity of 8.68dBi. It has a broad beam width. Gain and Directivity 3D far field plots are given below in figure 9. Gain and Directivity polar plots are given below in figure 10.

Length of 70ȍ transmission line 3.21mm Width of 70ȍ transmission line 17.53mm Length of 100ȍ transmission line 1.37mm

Width of 100ȍ transmission line 17.98mm

(5)

(a) Gain 3D Far Field Plot (b) Directivity 3D Far Field Plot Figure 9. Directivity and Gain 3D Far Field Plot of 2x1 RMP Antenna Array

Table 4 Simulated Results of 2x1 RMP Antenna array

Figure 10. Directivity and Gain Polar Plot of 2x1 RMP Antenna Array

E. Simulated Results for 2×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

Table 4 shows all simulated results viz. Return loss, VSWR, Gain and Bandwidth of 2x1 antenna array using HFSS.

IV. DESIGN ANALYSIS & PERFORMANCE ASSESMENT OF A4×1RMP ANTENNA ARRAY

The 4x1 rectangular microstrip patch antenna array is designed using HFSS by placing same microstrip antenna in linear configuration. The power divider technique for feeding is used in 4x1 antenna array. Using this technique the power goes to equal in every antenna element. The 4x1 microstrip patch antenna is designed using same dimensions which are given in table 2. The 4x1 antenna array is given below in figure 11.

Parameter Value

Return Loss

S

11(dB) -16.91

VSWR 1.33 Gain (dB) 6.50dB

Directivity (dBi) 8.68dBi

FBW(%) 4.17 Efficiency (%) 74.88

(6)

.

Figure 11. 4×1 RMP Antenna Array Figure 12. Power divider for 4×1 RMP Antenna Array

A Power divider for 4×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

The use of 5-port power divider is especially important for an antenna array system that utilizes a power-splitting network, such a parallel or corporate feed system. The 5-port power divider is combination of two 2-port power dividers. The corporate feed is simply a device that splits power between n outputs ports with a certain distribution while maintaining equal path lengths from input to output ports. The power divider of 4x1 microstrip patch antenna is designed as shown in fig. 12 using same dimensions which are given in table 3.

B S Parameter for Power divider (4×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array) –

S Parameter of Power Divider for 4X1 antenna array shows the return loss on port 1. Return loss value is

S

11 =- 19.47dB at 2.4GHz as shown in fig. 13.

Figure 13. S Parameter for Power divider Figure 14. S Parameter for 4×1 RMP Antenna Array

C S11 Plot for 4×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

The

S

11plot of the designed 4x1 microstrip patch antenna array is shown in figure 14. The bandwidth of patch antenna is determined by the return loss graph. The bandwidth of patch antenna is the frequency range over which return loss or

S

11= -10dB. The Return loss and Bandwidth of 4x1 antenna array is

S

11= -16.49dB and BW=4.61%.

D Gain and Directivity for 4×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

The designed antenna array radiates in broadside direction with gain of 7.23dB and the directivity of 9.78dBi. It has a broad beam width. Gain and Directivity 3D far field plots are given below in figure 15. Gain and Directivity polar plots are given below in figure 16.

(7)

(a) Gain 3D Far Field Plot (b)Directivity 3D Far Field Plot Figure 15. Directivity and Gain 3D Far Field Plot of 4x1 RMP Antenna Array

Table 5 Simulated Results of 4x1 RMP Antenna Array

Figure 16. Directivity and Gain Polar Plot of 4x1 RMP Antenna Array

E Simulated Results for 4×1Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Array –

Table 5 shows all simulated results viz. Return loss, VSWR, Gain and Bandwidth of 4x1 antenna array using HFSS.

V. RESULTS

A microstrip patch antenna has small bandwidth, gain and directivity. For increasing the bandwidth, gain and directivity, we use the array of microstrip patch antenna. For making of antenna array we use the same antenna by placing equal distances and linear configuration. When we use a 2x1 array, it has more return loss than single microstrip patch antenna. When we use a 4x1 antenna array, it has more return loss compare to single microstrip patch antenna and 2x1 antenna array. Comparison between S Parameter of RMP antenna and array is given in figure 17. Comparison between VSWR Parameter of RMP antenna and array is given in figure 18. Simulated results for RMP antenna and array are given in table 6.

Parameter Value

Return Lo -16.49

VSWR 1.35

Gain (dB) 7.23dB

Directivity (dBi) 9.78dBi

FBW(%) 4.61 Efficiency (%) 76.93

(8)

.

Figure 17 Comparison between S Parameter of RMP antenna and array

Figure 18 Comparison between VSWR of RMP antenna and array

Table 6 Simulated results of a microstrip patch antenna, 2x1 and 4x1 RMP antenna array

Parameters Microstrip Patch

Antenna

2x1 Antenna Array 4x1 Antenna Array

Return Loss

S

11 (dB) -32.11 -16.91 -16.49

VSWR 1.051 1.333 1.352

Gain (dB) 4.023 6.503 8.776

Directivity (dBi) 5.989 8.683 11.407

FBW (%) 3.75 4.17 4.61

Efficiency (%) 67.17 74.88 76.93

VI. CONCLUSION&FUTURESCOPE

The result obtained in simulation proved that the FBW(%), Gain and Directivity of single microstrip patch antenna is less than FBW(%), Gain and Directivity of 2x1 and 4x1 antenna array. Some optimization technique can be used for getting better results because in this work optimization has done manually.

REFERENCES

[1] George Casu, Catalin Moraru and Anderi Kovacs (2014), Design and implementation of microstrip patch antenna array, IEEE Communications (COMM) 2014 10th conference, Acc. No. 14484740, page 1-4.

[2] Norfishah Ab Wahab and Z .B. Maslam, W. Muhammad and Norhayati Hamzah (2010), Microstrip rectangular 4x1 array antenna at 2.5GHz for WiMax application, IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Network.

(9)

[3] B. Sai Sandeep and S. Sreenath Kashyap (2012), Design and simulation of microstrip array antenna for wireless communication at 2.4GHz, IJSER, Vol. 3, Issue-11.

[4] R. Mailloux, John F. Mcllvenna and Nicholas P. Kernwesis (1981), Microstrip array technology, Vol. 29, pp. 25-3.

[5] Lalit Kaushal, R K Mishra (2015), Design analysis and performance assessment of RMP Antenna for WLAN, IJERT, Vol.4, Issue 7, 2015, pp. 785-790.

[6] Gi-Cho Kang and Hak-Younglee, Jony-Kyu Kim and Myun-Joo Park (2003), Ku-band high efficiency antenna with corporate series-fed array, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 4, pp. 690-693

[7] A. Abbaspour Tamijani and K. Sarabandi (2003), An affordable millimetre wave beam steerable antenna using interleaved planner subarrays, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 51, pp. 2193-2202

References

Related documents

in which veralipride has been compared against placebo, it has been reported that there is a statistically significant reduction in frequency as well as in intensity of hot

Moreover, the possibility of having a power supply interruption of end-customers connected to a low voltage (LV) distribution grid is diminished since adjacent

Table (2) Test Result Of Field Performance Evaluation Of Low-Hp Tractor Operated Stubble Shaver-Cum-Off Barring Implement With Fertilizer Metering For Sugarcane Crop.. Width

Figure 28 shows the performance of MI-SBTVD un- der the presence of impulsive noise considering the chan- nel IMPUL-O, for 64-QAM modulation and LDPC code with rate 3/4, which

11 Figure 1.2: Quantum chemical calculations of the anticipated reaction pathways and associated energetics during the reaction of Al(CH3)3 + H2O. a) shows the first half-reaction

In this article, we propose several Bayesian hierarchical models for mapping multiple QTL that simultaneously fit and estimate all possible genetic effects associated with all

CSS: Social Security; HRS: Health Research System; ICGES: Gorgas Commemorative Institute of Health Studies; IFARHU: Institute for the Formation and Development of Human

APEC: Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation; CEP: Certificate of suitability; COE: Centres of excellence; CPP: Certificate of pharmaceutical product; CTA: Clinical trial application;