12:15
Conference Registration
1:15
Conference Chairperson’s Welcome and
Opening Remarks
Deborah S. Turner, Associate Director, Computer and Automation Validation, Alkermes plc
1:30
Celebrating 30 Years of Computer Validation Trends,
Regulations and Directives
The FDA published its first guidance for inspection of computer systems used in pharmaceutical manufacturing in February 1983. It was “fondly” called the “Blue Book” due to the color of its cover. We are now in 2013 and the use of computer technology has changed profoundly over the past 30 years. Many more regulations and guidances have been developed by authorities around the world and changes like cloud technology continue to expand the horizons of technology and compliance directives. In this presentation, an eyewitness to the 30 year progression shares insights and analysis of the advances made by the industry, technology and the authorities and discusses common themes across all legislative requirements. Reviewing history can help us understand the context for today’s computer validation practices and regulatory conditions. It is not all madness, there really is a method to it. Attendees in this session learn: t 5IFMPHJDBMQSPHSFTTJPOPGDPNQVUFSSFHVMBUJPOTBT
authorities attempted to keep up with technology trends over the past 30 years
t 5IFDPNNPOUIFNFTBDSPTTBMMSFHVMBUJPOTBOEEJSFDUJWFT Then and now
t "QSBDUJDBMFYFSDJTFGPSUSBJOJOHFNQMPZFFTPOSFHVMBUJPOT and directives in an engaging manner
t "HMPCBMQFSTQFDUJWFPODPNQVUFSWBMJEBUJPOUPEBZ Teri Stokes, Ph.D., Director, GXP International
2:15
Computer System Validation Then and Now —
Learning Management in the Cloud
Non GMP cloud-based HR systems have been available for many years. This session looks at B. Braun’s journey in moving from an in-house validated training tracking system to learning management in the cloud.
t 4ZTUFNTUSBUFHJFTBOEXIZ##SBVOEFDJEFEUPNPWFUP the cloud t 7BMJEBUJPOQSPDFTTGPS##SBVOTJOUFSOBMUSBJOJOH tracking system t ,FZDPODFSOTPGVTJOH-FBSOJOH.BOBHFNFOU4ZTUFNT -.4JOUIFDMPVEBOEUIFTUFQTUBLFOUPNJUJHBUFSJTL t &YQFDUFEDVSSFOUWBMJEBUJPOQSPDFTTPGPVSDMPVECBTFE-.4 Dennis Houser, BSIE, MBA, PMP, Director, Corporate HR Systems & Payroll, B. Braun Medical Inc.
Heather Carrillo, MBA, PMP, HRIS Analyst, B. Braun Medical Inc.
3:15
Networking and Refreshment Break
3:45Cloud Computing — Manage Risk in a
Regulated Environment
Many life sciences companies are wary of moving applications into a cloud-based model, as it is not immediately clear how the risks associated with this technology can be assessed, let alone managed. This presentation shows that with an understanding of the different variants of cloud architecture, and a provider that understands the life sciences industry, understanding and managing the risks is relatively straightforward.
t 6OEFSTUBOEUIFUSVFEFGJOJUJPOPGDMPVEDPNQVUJOH t 3FWJFXUIFEJGGFSFOUDMPVENPEFMT t &WBMVBUFIPXDMPVENPEFMTBMJHOXJUI(".1EFGJOJUJPOT t %FUFSNJOFIPXUPTFMFDUBOBQQSPQSJBUFDMPVEQSPWJEFS t 4FMFDUBOBQQSPQSJBUFDMPVENPEFM t 2VBMJGZBOEWBMJEBUFDMPVEBQQMJDBUJPOT Dave Hawley, Director, Life Sciences,
Business & Decision North America
4:30
Recent CSV Enforcement — Learn from Trends and
Proactively Avoid Part 11 Citations
Translating regulatory and guidance documents into a SPCVTU$47QSPHSBNUIBUTUBOETVQUPUIFTDSVUJOZPGBO '%"JOTQFDUPSDBOCFEBVOUJOH,OPXJOHXIBUSFHVMBUPSZ JOTQFDUPSTBSFMPPLJOHGPS BOETPNFUJNFTOPUGJOEJOH during their inspections can be a valuable tool. This session provides an in-depth, practical look at:
t 5PQ$47WBMJEBUJPOEFGJDJFODJFTDJUFECZUIF'%" t &OGPSDFNFOUGPDVTBSFBT
t 4FMGBVEJUJOHQSPHSBNTUIBUXPSL Wen Wang, Senior Validation Engineer, Genoptix 5:15
Write Effective Software Requirement
Specifications
The output of any software validation project depends on the quality of the requirements. Frequently, software requirement specifications are poorly written, which can lead to significant rework costs and project delays. This presentation provides a comprehensive overview of how to write software requirements that meet quality standards. t 5IFJNQPSUBODFPGXSJUJOHHPPESFRVJSFNFOUT t $IBSBDUFSJTUJDTPGRVBMJUZSFRVJSFNFOUTUBUFNFOUT t 3FRVJSFNFOUTRVBMJUZJOEJDBUPST
t (FOFSBMHVJEFMJOFTGPSXSJUJOHHPPESFRVJSFNFOUT Gregory W. Pierce, President, EngiSystems Software Validation 6:00
Close of Day One
%":0/&r8&%/&4%": "13*-
L
N fo m Case Study$ ) 0 0 4 & ' 3 0 . 5 ) 3 & & * / 5 & 3 " $ 5 * 7 & 8 0 3 , 4 ) 0 1 4 " $
There will be a 30-minute networking and refreshment break at 10:15
In this closed-door summit, senior-level computer validation and quality managers from pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device companies engage in open discussion with their colleagues about strategies for managing their most pressing challenges. The content for this summit is
driven by the participants who are surveyed ahead of time about the topics they wish to discuss. This session is open to the first twenty senior-level professionals who pre-register for the interactive discussion group. In order to pre-register, you must have more UIBOZFBSTPGFYQFSJFODFJO$47FYFDVUJPO
and currently work for a pharmaceutical, medical device or biotech company. IVT reserves the right to qualify participants for the workshop.
Deborah S. Turner, Associate Director, Computer and Automation Validation, Alkermes plc
4&/*03-&7&-5)*/,5"/,"1-"5'03.50%*4$644453"5&(*&4
505"$,-&50%":4$47$)"--&/(&4
A
7:15Continental Breakfast
%":580r5)634%": "13*-
3 0 6 / % 5 " # - & # 3 & " , ' " 4 5
%*4"45&33&$07&3:"/%#64*/&44$0/5*/6*5:3&7*4*5&%
–*.1"$540')045&%
"/%$-06%#"4&%4&37*$&4
I.
Review Traditional Disaster
Recovery (DR) and
Business Continuity (BC)
Activities
a. Plan for disasters
b. Take stock – system inventory c. Identify roles and
responsibilities d. Account for logistical
problems
e. Test and verify the plan f. Consider managed services
II.
You and Your Team
g. Institute high availability I 7JSUVBMJ[FUIFDPNQVUJOH
environment
J ,FFQJUPOMJOF– network storage
III.
Consider Hosted and
Cloud-Based Services
a. Identify impacts b Mitigate the risks c. Adjust the approach
IV.
Interactive Session
Participants discuss aspects of disaster recovery and business continuity for a case study involving internally and externally hosted applications Mike Byrd, Director of CSV,
ProPharma Group, Inc
The objective of this workshop is to gain a solid understanding of risk management definitions, concepts and techniques. You discuss how these can be applied to the development and validation of computer systems.
I.
What Is Risk Management?
t 6OEFSTUBOEUIFEFGJOJUJPOPG risk in order to better apply risk management
t -FWFSBHFUIFDPODFQUT and techniques of the risk management process t "QQMZRVBMJUZSJTLNBOBHFNFOU
concepts and techniques to computer system development and validation II.
Risk Assessment Tools
t ,OPXXIJDISJTLBTTFTTNFOUUPPMT are available to you
t 6OEFSTUBOEIPXFBDISJTL assessment tool works
t &WBMVBUFXIJDISJTLBTTFTTNFOUUPPM is best for which type of application t &YBNQMFTPGFBDISJTL
assessment tool
III.
Risk Management Applied to Right
Sizing Your Computer Validation
t "TTFTTLFZDPNQPOFOUTPGSJTL throughout the system lifecycle t 6OEFSTUBOEIPXUPNBOBHFPS
mitigate risk
t 6UJMJ[FLFZ$47RVFTUJPOTBOESJTL considerations and determine XIJDI$47EFMJWFSBCMFJTJNQBDUFE t 1BSUJDJQBUFJOFYBNQMFRVFTUJPOT
and risk considerations provided to determine how to apply a SJHIUTJ[FE$47BQQSPBDI IV.
Interactive Exercise #1
During this first interactive exercise, BUUFOEFFTQBSUJDJQBUFBTBO4.&POB
1)"'.&"SJTLBTTFTTNFOU-FBSOXIBU JUUBLFTUPQFSGPSNB1)"'.&"SJTL assessment as well as some key risk assessment facilitations skills. V.
Interactive Exercise #2
During this interactive exercise, attendees sit on a panel and discuss how known risks may influence how a computer system is validated. A mock computer system is presented along with some outcomes of risk assessments. Based on this information, participants share with the session facilitator and other members of the workshop how an example computer system’s validation plan may be shaped by risk management.
Dennis J. Caron, Associate Director, IT Computer Systems Validation (CSV), Covance Inc. Michael Osburn, Associate Director, IT Computer Systems Validation (CSV), Covance Inc.
3*4,."/"(&.&/5"/%$0.165&37"-*%"5*0/
h b
I. What do the Requirements Mean? t $MPTFMPPLBU$'31BSU t 3FWJFXPG"OOFY t %FGJOJUJPOTPG&MFDUSPOJD3FDPSET &MFDUSPOJD4JHOBUVSFT &3&4 t $POTFRVFODFTPGOPUGPMMPXJOH regulations
II. How to Demonstrate Compliance t 1VUQSPDFEVSFTJOQMBDF t %FWFMPQBO&3&4(Y1 assessment questionnaire t 5FTUFMFDUSPOJD records functionality t 5FTUFMFDUSPOJD signature functionality
III. Interactive Exercise
6TJOHBSFBMMJGFFYBNQMF QBSUJDJQBOUT FYFDVUFBO&3&4(Y1RVFTUJPOOBJSFGPSB OFXQJFDFPG2$MBCFRVJQNFOU Bonus Material
t 3FMFWBOUBSUJDMFT
Matthew Poeta, Senior Technologist, IT Compliance, Genzyme (a Sanofi Company)
I. How the FDA Creates and Uses Spreadsheets t -FBSOIPX'%"WBMJEBUFTUIFJSPXO spreadsheets t 6UJMJ[F&YDFMEBUBWBMJEBUJPOUPFOGPSDF data integrity t &WBMVBUFUIFVTFBOEDPOUSPMPG controlled templates t %FUFSNJOF&YDFMQSPUFDUJPOUFDIOJRVFT prior to spreadsheet validation t "WPJE'%"XBSOJOHMFUUFST
II. Techniques to Properly Validate Spreadsheets t 7FSJGZGPSNVMBTBOEGVODUJPOT t 6TFMFBOWBMJEBUJPOUFDIOJRVFTUPTQFFE things up t -FBSOIPXUPQSPQFSMZVTFQSPUFDUJPOJO &YDFM t 4IBSFMFTTPOTXFIBWFMFBSOFE
III. Interactive Exercise
Attendees select a small spreadsheet with some tough challenges to demonstrate how to handle each case quickly, efficiently and effectively. Attendees also have the opportunity to download some sample templates of both spreadsheets and the validation documents that go with them.
Ty Mew, President, Ofni Systems
&9$&-413&"%4)&&57"-*%"5*0/1307&/5&$)/*26&4'03'%"$0.1-*"/5413&"%4)&&54 I H & &
"%&&1%*7&*/50$'31"35"/%"//&9,&:13*/$*1-&4"/%5",&"8":4'30.&"$)(6*%"/$& " "
$ ) 0 0 4 & ' 3 0 . 5 ) 3 & & . * / 6 5 & 4 & 4 4 * 0 / 4
I.
What are the Business
Advantages of Master Data
Management (MDM)?
t 8IBUJTNBTUFSEBUB t 8IBUBSFUIFCVTJOFTTBEWBOUBHFT PG.%. t )PXJTNBTUFSEBUBNBOBHFE JOQSBDUJDF t )PXJTNBTUFSEBUBVTFE t 8IBUJTUIFSFHVMBUPSZTJHOJGJDBODF PGNBTUFSEBUBII.
Qualify or Validate MDM
systems and Data Services?
t %BUBTFSWJDFTBOEPUIFS4FSWJDF 0SJFOUFE"SDIJUFDUVSF 40"TFSWJDFT t .BTUFSEBUBTUBOEBSET and versioning t 4IPVME40"NJEEMFXBSFCF RVBMJGJFE WBMJEBUFEPSCPUI t "QSBHNBUJDBQQSPBDIUP.%.qualification and validation III.
Validate Data Services against
MDM Standards
t %PFTFWFSZEBUBTFSWJDFOFFEUP CFWBMJEBUFE
t %PFTFWFSZEBUBTFSWJDFOFFE to be validated against every EBUBTUBOEBSE
t )PXEPZPVMFWFSBHFWFOEPS TUBOEBSET
IV.
Interactive Exercise — Develop
a MDM Validation Strategy
In this group exercise, different master data sets are presented for groups to choose from (product master, customer master, recipe master and TVQQMJFSNBTUFS&BDIHSPVQJTUIFO presented with a data service scenario (an application that needs to provision PSDPOTVNFNBTUFSEBUBBOEBTFU of facts and assumptions, and works to develop a suitable risk-based validation strategy.David Hawley, Director,
Business & Decision Life Sciences
."45&3%"5"."/"(&.&/57"-*%"5&%"5"4&37*$&4"("*/45."45&3%"5".0%&-4
I
W
1
In this interactive workshop, attendees explore the various types of cloud services, learn how each might be leveraged to support GxP systems and understand the measures that need to be taken to minimize risk and ensure compliance.
I.
Cloud Computing Paradigms
t *OEVTUSZUSFOETGPSVTJOHDMPVE implementations
t $MPVETFSWJDFNPEFMTBOECFTUVTF cases for each
t 0QQPSUVOJUJFTBOEDIBMMFOHFTGPS each model
II.
Elements of a Cloud
Compliance Framework
t 7FOEPSTFMFDUJPOQSPDFTT t 2VBMJGJDBUJPOBOEWBMJEBUJPO t 4FDVSJUZBOEEBUBJOUFHSJUZDPOUSPMT t 0OHPJOHNPOJUPSJOHBOE change managementIII.
Qualification and Validation of a
Cloud Computing Platform
t %JTDVTTXIFOUPRVBMJGZPSWBMJEBUF t -FBSOXIFOUPBVEJUBOEXIBUUP look for t -FWFSBHFWFOEPSQSPDFTTFT and documentation t %FGFOEZPVSBQQSPBDI
IV.
Interactive Exercise #1
Attendees work through case studies to develop a framework for planning, executing and controlling company assets in a cloud computing environment.V.
Interactive Exercise #2
Attendees are asked to bring their current cloud computing questions and challenges. Workshop leaders plan to select several challenges and work as a group to identify potential solutions using key concepts from the session. Colleen Turner, Director, IT Validation Services, Bristol-Myers SquibbColleen Harney, Associate Director, IT Validation Services, Bristol-Myers Squibb
$0.1-*"/$&*/5)&$-06%0110356/*5*&4"/%$)"--&/(&4
In this iI. The Purpose of a Master Plan for Computer Validation t )PXEPFTJUEJGGFSGSPN7.1BOE71 t )PXDBOJUSFEVDFUIFEPDVNFOUMPBE II. Roles for System Teams,
Sponsors, and Quality
III. Elements of a Master Validation Plan for Computer Validation
t *ODMVTJPOT FYDMVTJPOT BOEMJNJUBUJPOT t 4UBOEBSEFMFNFOUT
t 'MFYJCMFVTFT IV. Interactive Case Work
t 6TFEPDVNFOUTGSPNBSFBMQSPKFDUUP TFFIPXUPEFWFMPQB.BTUFS1MBO.JOJ Form approach to computer validation is a regulated environment
Bonus Material: Chapter 6 from new book
Computer Validation: A Common Sense Guide
by Dr. Teri Stokes. Book available at Amazon.com Teri Stokes Ph.D., Director,
GXP International %&7&-01"$0.13&)&/4*7&."45&31-"/'03$0.165&37"-*%"5*0/*/"3&(6-"5&%&/7*30/.&/5 % % % %
5
/ F U X P S L J O H B O E 3 F G S F T I N F O U # S F B LC H O O S E F R O M 5 8 0 . * / 6 5 & 4 & 4 4 * 0 / 4
I. Why Create and Execute Protocol Test Plans/Scripts? t 7FSJGZUIBU6TFS3FRVJSFNFOUTIBWF been met t %FNPOTUSBUFUIBUUIFTZTUFNJTGJUGPS use t 4BUJTGZSFHVMBUPSZSFRVJSFNFOUT II. How Do We Know What to Test?
t %FNPOTUSBUFUIBUSFRVJSFNFOUT 634 '4 FUDIBWFCFFOTBUJTGJFE
t 1SJPSJUJ[FUFTUJOHBDUJWJUJFTCBTFEPOSJTL ranking
t -FWFSBHFQSFWJPVTUFTUJOHUPTBUJTGZ current testing requirements III. Handle Non-Conformances/
Incidents t %PDVNFOUUIFJODJEFOU t %FUFSNJOFUIFSPPUDBVTF t %FUFSNJOFDPSSFDUJWFBDUJPOT t 3FTPMWFUIFJTTVF t 3FFYFDVUFUIFTDSJQU JGSFRVJSFE
IV. Interactive Exercise 6TJOHBSFBMMJGFFYBNQMF participants develop a test script for a new software application based on user requirements. The participants execute the test script BOEEPDVNFOUSFTPMWFBOZOPO DPOGPSNBODFTJODJEFOUT
Matthew Poeta, Senior Technologist, IT Compliance, Genzyme (a Sanofi Company)
$3&"5&7"-*%"5*0/13050$0-5&451-"/4"/%5&454$3*154 I W $ $ $
4
$ M P T F P G % B Z 5 X P$ ) 0 0 4 & ' 3 0 . 5 8 0 . * / 6 5 & 4 & 4 4 * 0 / 4
I.
Develop Human-Based/
Static Testing Strategies
t $SFBUFBUPPMTFU UIJTJTOPUBOFYBNJOBUJPOPGUFTUJOHUPPMT t 1MBOGPSSFWJFXUFTUJOHTFTTJPOT t 6TFUFTUJOHSFTVMUTUPQMBO
functional testing
II.
Develop Test Scenarios
t &WBMVBUFSJTL
)PXNVDIUFTUJOHJTFOPVHI
t $POTJEFSCSBODIJOH EFDJTJPO tables, etc.
t &YBNJOFXIBUUIFVTFS requirements tell you t %FWFMPQZPVSUFTUJOH
LOPXMFEHFJOUVJUJPO III.
Analyze Testing
t 6TFZPVSUFTUJOHSFTVMUTUPQMBO future strategies
t -PPLGPSZPVSUFTUJOHHBQT
t 4FMMZPVSUFTUJOHTUSBUFHJFT to management
IV.
Interactive Exercise
Participants examine and discuss testing strategies that go beyond executing test scripts to identify system deficiencies. Attendees look at ways to identify issues before the first line of code is created. Mark Cole, Deputy Director, IS Quality, Compliance and Security, Sanofi Pasteur5&45*/(5)306()0655)&%&7&-01.&/5-*'&$:$-&
7
%":5)3&&r'3*%": "13*-
C H O O S E F R O M T H R E E . * / 6 5 & 4 & 4 4 * 0 / 4
I.Introduction to
Process Measurement
t 8IZNFBTVSF t 8IBUUPNFBTVSF * software quality * compliance to external regulations, standards and guidance * consistency of process execution * efficiencyII.
Explore Various
Measurement Methodologies
t %FGFDUBOBMZTJTBOEUSFOEJOH t $"1"EBUBBOBMZTJTBOEUSFOEJOH t 1SPDFTTBTTVSBODF t 1SPDFTTEFWJBUJPOBOBMZTJT and trending t "VEJUSFTVMUTFOGPSDFNFOU trend analysis t 1SPKFDUBTTFTTNFOUT t %BUBNJOJOHIII.
Evaluate and Act on
Measurement Results
IV.Interactive Exercise
Participants develop a measurement program for a spreadsheet validation process.
Joseph Zec, Software Quality Senior Manager, Quality & Regulatory, Philips Health Care
&/463&5)&&''&$5*7&/&440'7"-*%"5*0/130$&%63&4"/%13050$0-4
II
9
I.Mobility
t .PCJMFBQQTBOEUIFDPODFQU of mobility t "EWBOUBHFTBOESJTLTPGNPCJMF app environments t .PCJMFBOE'%"II.
Validation Approach
t $47JOUIFXPSMEPG/08 DIFBQ and free
t $47JOOPWBUJPO
t 1SPUFDUUIFWBMJEBUJPO$POUSPMT
III.
Interactive Exercise
6TJOHBSFBMMJGFFYBNQMFQBSUJDJQBOUT look at the challenges presented by the use of mobile applications to conduct activities required by the 2VBMJUZ4ZTUFN3FHVMBUJPOT Michael Romeu-Lugo, CISA, Global IT Senior Manager, Quality and Compliance, Teleflex Incorporated
)085046$$&44'6--:7"-*%"5&"/"11-*$"5*0/'03&-&$530/*$.0#*-&%&7*$&4
I
M
10
I.
Select the Right System
t 4DBMBCMF t .BJOUBJOBCMF t *OUFSGBDF t "DDFTT
II.
Vendor Validation Packages
t 1VSDIBTFPSOPU t 7FOEPSFYFDVUJPO t 7BMVFUPZPVSPSHBOJ[BUJPO
III.
Level Set Your Validation Effort
t 4QFDJBMDPOTJEFSBUJPOTt 0QUJPOBMUFTUJOH t 5FTUFOWJSPONFOU
IV.
Change Management
t $IBOHFSFMFBTFT t 7FOEPSOPUJGJDBUJPO t 5FTUFOWJSPONFOUNBOBHFNFOU t .BJOUFOBODFBOEQFSJPEJDSFWJFX V.
Interactive Exercise
2VFTUJPOBOEBOTXFSTFTTJPO Deborah S. Turner, Associate Director, Validation, Alkermes plc$47"/%-"#03"503:%"5"4:45&.4
I
S
11
/ F U X P S L J O H - V O D I F P O
I.
Purpose of the CSV Periodic
Review (PR)
t 8IFOUPQFSGPSN13 t 13QSPDFTT t #FOFGJUTPG$4713 t 5SJHHFSUPQFSGPSN13 t 6TFPGSJTLNBOBHFNFOUUPPMTUP assess impact to validated systemsII.
What to Review
t $PNQVUFSTZTUFNWBMJEBUJPOTUBUVT JODMVEFTSFRVBMJGJDBUJPO SFWBMJEBUJPOJGBOZ t 3FWJFXBCPVUDPNQVUFSTZTUFNTFDVSJUZ t #BDLVQBOESFTUPSBUJPOEFUBJMT t %FWJBUJPOTJODMVEJOHVOQMBOOFE EPXOUJNF USPVCMFTTZTUFNMPHT t $IBOHFTUPDPNQVUFSJ[FETZTUFNT
(includes changes to company TUBOEBSET QPMJDFTQSPDFEVSFT t $PNQVUFSTZTUFNSFUJSFNFOUEFUBJMT t $PNQMBJOUTSFMBUFEUPUIFTZTUFN t $PNQVUFSTZTUFNBDDFTTMJTUBOE
adjustment to the computer system access
t $"1" JODMVEFTBOZSFHSFTTJPO UFTUJOHGPSBTZTUFN
t 5SBDLJOH BDUJPOTJEFOUJGJFEGSPN the current periodic review and status for the actions identified GSPNUIFQSFWJPVTSFWJFX III.
Report of PR
IV.
Remediation
Yau Kai Wong, Associate Director, QA Validation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
1&3*0%*$3&7*&80'7"-*%"5&%4:45&.4&91&$5"5*0/4463306/%*/(
THE TIMING AND THE INFORMATION THAT IS REVIEWED
I
P
8
C H O O S E F R O M 5 ) 3 & & . * / 6 5 & 4 & 4 4 * 0 / 4
I.
Define the Purpose,
Scope and Structure of
an Electronic Archive
t 8IBUJTBOFMFDUSPOJDBSDIJWFand why is backup media not an FMFDUSPOJDBSDIJWF
t 8IBUJTUIF0&$%HVJEBODF approach to archiving and FMFDUSPOJDBSDIJWFT
t "OBMZTJTPG401UPQJDTGSPN0&$% for establishing an archive II.
Archiving Principles, Archivist
Values and The Electronic
Document Difference
t 1SPWFOBODF PSJHJOBMPSEFSindexing and catalogue
t 3FDPSEDPMMFDUJPOBOESFUFOUJPO values and best practices t 4DBMF NVUBCJMJUZBOESFBEBCJMJUZ t /FFETBOBMZTJTGPSQMBOOJOH
a long term retention requirements specification III.
Interactive Exercise
t &BSDIJWFQMBOOJOHUFBNTBSF formed by participants from similar types of organizations t "SDIJWJTUUFBNTVTF0&$%BSDIJWF
HVJEBODF401UPQJDTBOEBMPOHUFSN retention “as is” checklist to perform a needs analysis for planning their requirements for an electronic archive in an organization like their own
Bonus Material:
t $IBQUFS5IF"SDIJWJTU3PMFGPS &MFDUSPOJD"SDIJWFTGSPN%S4UPLFT recent book Computer Validation: A Common Sense Guide. Available at www.BioPharm-Guides.com. t 0SHBOJ[BUJPOGPS&DPOPNJD
Cooperation and Development 0&$%(VJEBODF i&TUBCMJTINFOUBOE$POUSPMPG Archives that Operate in Compliance XJUIUIF1SJODJQMFTPG(-1w
Teri Stokes, Ph.D., Director, GXP International
&45"#-*4)*/(5)&"3$)*7*4530-&'03&-&$530/*$"3$)*7&4
I.
Define “Validation Type”
and Applicability
t 6OEFSTUBOERVBMJGJDBUJPO vs. validation
* infrastructure * applications
* plant floor manufacturing equipment
* regulatory applicability
II.
Interpret the Key Principles
and Processes of ISPE’s
GAMP 5
™and ASTM E 2500
t 0WFSWJFXPG*41&T(".1™ and "45.&QSPDFTTFT
t "MJHONFOUPG*41&T(".1™ with "45.&
III.
Implementation of Your
Validation Program — What Are
the Required Elements?
t 3JTLCBTFEBQQSPBDIUP software categorization per *41&T(".1™ methodology t 7FOEPSEPDVNFOUBUJPO t 12NFUIPEPMPHZCZFYDFQUJPO t :PVSiBTCVJMUwBOEUIFSPMFPG change control t #VHGJYFT QBUDIFT TFSWJDFQBDLT t 1FSJPEJDSFWJFX
Bonus Information
t 8FCTJUFTTVQQPSUJOH)$1QPSUBMT impacting data privacy and product informationJudith Samardelis, Senior Manager, IS Compliance and Quality Release, MedImmune
%&4*(/"-&"/"/%"(*-&$0.165&37"-*%"5*0/130(3".65*-*;*/(*41&4(".1
™.&5)0%0-0(:"/%"45.&
I.
Social Media and The Life
Sciences Industry
t 4PDJBMNFEJBA common definition t "EWBOUBHFT SJTLTBOEMJBCJMJUJFT t 5IF'%"BOETPDJBMNFEJB
II.
Social Media ≠ Labeling
t 5IFSJHIUDPOUSPMT4PDJBMNFEJBQPMJDZ t .JUJHBUFSJTLT.POJUPSJOH III.
Interactive Exercise
Attendees review a social media proposal, identify its risks and propose the controls to address them.
Michael Romeu-Lugo, CISA, Global IT Senior Manager, Quality and Compliance, Teleflex Incorporated
Dan Callari, Senior Customer Facing Manager, Teleflex Incorporated
3&(6-"503:3&410/4*#*-*5*&4'0340$*"-.&%*"
14
A G R E A T P L A C E T O M E E T Y O U R M A R K E T
Take advantage of the best opportunity to meet potential clients face-to-face. Build relationships while
demonstrating thought leadership and sharing expertise. For more information on how to position your
company as a sponsor or exhibitor, contact Taylor Biggers at 339-298-2108
or email [email protected].
C O N F E R E N C E S P O N S O R S
Delivering Excellence
$ ) 0 0 4 & ' 3 0 . 5 ) 3 & & . * / 6 5 & 4 & 4 4 * 0 / 4
I.
Requirements
t 6TFS t #VTJOFTT t "DDFTT t *OUFSGBDF t -BZFST II.Audit
t "VEJUJOHGPS4FSWJDF t "VEJUJOHGPS$PNQMJBODF t "VEJUJOHGPS7BMJEBUJPO III.Testing
t 7FOEPSUFTUJOH t *OUFSOBMUFTUJOHIV.
Change Management
t $IBOHFT t /PUJGJDBUJPO t 3FBDUJPO
t &OWJSPONFOUNBOBHFNFOU
V.
Interactive Exercise
Participants discuss current concerns XJUI4BB4WFOEPSTBOEUFDIOJRVFTUP help compliantly manage them. Deborah S. Turner, Associate Director Validation, Alkermes plc
&''&$5*7&-:7"-*%"5&40'58"3&"4"4&37*$&
15
I.
Purpose of Audit
II.
How to Select an Appropriate
Cloud Service Provider
t 6OEFSTUBOEXIBUJTEJGGFSFOUabout the cloud
t $BUFHPSJ[FSJTLTBTTPDJBUFEXJUI cloud computing
t 4FMFDUBOBQQSPQSJBUFDMPVENPEFM and service provider
III.
Audit Process
t "VEJUQSFQBSBUJPO t "VEJUDIFDLMJTU t Actual auditt "VEJUSFQPSU t 'PMMPXVQ
Yau Kai Wong, Associate Director, QA Validation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
&''&$5*7&-:$0/%6$54611-*&3"6%*540/$47"/%4""44&37*$&1307*%&34
16
I.Characterize CSV
Process Changes
t 8IZNPOJUPS t 8IFOEPFTBDIBOHF CFDPNFTJHOJGJDBOU * $BTF4UVEZ*&MJNJOBUFnon-value added deliverables * $BTF4UVEZ**&MJNJOBUFOPO
value added compliance approvals
* $BTFTUVEZ***&MJNJOBUFB phase gate review
II.
Characterize Process
Monitoring Programs
t %FUFSNJOFXIBUUPNPOJUPS t &YBNJOFEJGGFSFOUNPOJUPSJOHtechniques
t &WBMVBUFBOEBDUPONPOJUPSJOHSFTVMUT
III.
Interactive Exercise
Participants develop a monitoring program to eliminate a phase gate review.
Joseph Zec, Corporate Software Steward, Senior Manager, Corporate Software QA, Boston Scientific Corp
.0/*503"7"-*%"5*0/130$&44"'5&3"4*(/*'*$"/5$)"/(&
I