• No results found

Analysis of Proteins of Mouse Sarcoma Pseudotype Viruses: Type-Specific Radioimmunoassays for Ecotropic Virus p30's

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Analysis of Proteins of Mouse Sarcoma Pseudotype Viruses: Type-Specific Radioimmunoassays for Ecotropic Virus p30's"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

0022-538X/79/06-0729/06$02.00/0

Analysis of Proteins of Mouse Sarcoma Pseudotype Viruses:

Type-Specific Radioimmunoassays

for

Ecotropic Virus p30's

STEPHEN J. KENNEL* AND RAYMOND W. TENNANT BiologyDivision, OakRidgeNationalLaboratory,OakRidge, Tennessee 37830

Received for publication24October 1979

Murinesarcoma viruspseudotypeswereprepared byinfection ofnonproducer cells (A1-2), which were transformed by the Gazdar strain ofmouse sarcoma

virus, with Gross (N-tropic), WN1802B (B-tropic), or Moloney (NB-tropic)

vi-ruses. Therespectivehostrangepseudotypesarcomaviruses weredefinedbythe

titration characteristics on cells with the appropriateFv-1 genotype. Proteins

fromvirus progenywereanalyzed bysodiumdodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Bands present in both the 65,000- and the 10,000- to

20,000-molecular-weight regions of the gel distinguished the pseudotype viruses from

theirrespective helpers. Furthermore,twoproteinbands were noted in thep30 region of murine sarcoma virus (Gross), onecorresponding to Grossvirusp30, and another of slightly slower mobility. However, since the mobility of the

putativesarcomap30isnearlyindentical to that ofWN1802B,itspresence could

notbeestablishedby sodiumdodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamidegelelectrophoresis.

Type-specificradioimmunoassaysforGrossvirusp30and forWN1802Bp30were

applied for analysis ofpseudotype preparations, and among several ecotropic virusestested, onlythehomologousvirusscored in therespective assay. Byuse

of these assays, pseudotype viruseswerefound to containonly8 to 48% helper-specific p30's; the remainder is presumablyderived from the sarcoma virus.

Cells transformed by defective mammalian

sarcoma viruses have varied contents of viral protein and viral RNA expression (11). Although allhave a rescuable transfornation gene, only somecontain information for certain gag gene proteins(presumablyfrom the "original helper"

orprogenitorvirus), whereas others do not (18).

Thepresence of the viral gag gene is necessary butnotsufficient for expression of these proteins innonproducercells(14); murinesarcoma virus (MuSV) pseudotype viruses, produced by rescue fromnonproducercells,contain gagproteins of

sarcoma origin only ifthe proteins themselves were expressed in the nonproducer cells (11). Passage of the virus pseudotypes to fresh cells

generates nonproducer cells with the same ca-pacity to express gag proteins as the original

nonproducer cell line (1). Hamster cells

trans-formned bytheGazdar strain of mouse sarcoma

virus release noninfectious particles containing mousegs-1antigen(p30).Rescue fromsuchcells

withfeline leukemia virus results inpseudotype virus with feline leukemia virus gp7O but with

mouseandfelinegs-1antigens, whichindicates that thesarcoma virusgenome carries at least a portionofthe gag gene (4, 15). A type-specific radioimmune assay has been developed for two ecotropic mouse retrovirus p30 proteins. The Gross virusstrain(N-tropic), derived from AKR

mice, and WN1802B (B-tropic) virus, derived

from BALB/c mice, were used to rescue the

Gazdar strain ofmouse sarcomavirus from Al-2 cells which had been nonproductively

trans-forned. We report here that these Fv-1

host-rangepseudotypesof the Gazdar strain ofmouse

sarcomaviruscontainmoresarcoma-specificp30

thanhelpervirusp30,althoughinfectioushelper

virusis inexcessbybiologicalassays.

MATERLALS AND METHODS

Viruses and assays.Gross, WN1802B, and Mo-loney viruses were originally obtained from W. P. Roweand JanetHartley (Bethesda, Md.). Pseudotype

viruseswerepreparedfrom nonproducercellswhich weretransformed with Gazdar sarcoma virus (4, 15). Propagationof viruses, XC syncytial plaque assay, and

focus-forming assays were done as previously de-scribed(9).The sources of other virusesareidentified in thetext.

Proteinanalysis.Viruses forprotein analysis were grown on SC-1 cells (9), collected at 24-h intervals, andpurified bysucrosegradient centrifugation as de-scribed elsewhere(Tennant et al.,manuscriptin prep-aration). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was done on 4 to 17% acrylamide linear gradient slab gels (8).Pelletedvirus extracted with trichloroacetic acid-etherwasdissolved in 1% SDS, 8 M urea, and 1% 2-mercaptoethanol before itwasappliedtothegel.

729

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(2)

Radioimmuneassays.Phosphocellulose chroma-tography and gelfiltrationonUltragelAcA44(LKB) were used for purification of p30's from Gross and

WN1802B viruses solubilized in Triton X-100 (17). These preparations were >90% pure as judged by

stained SDS-PAGEprofilesandinterspecies

radioim-munoassay. Rabbit anta.ato Gross and WN1802B viruseswereproduced by multiple subcutaneousand

intraderma! injections of Tween-disrupted virusesin Freundadjuvant.Virusproteins disrupted byNonidet P-40werecoupledtoSepharose 4Bat1mgof protein perml ofbeadsforantiserumadsorption (8). Serum

wasabsorbed four timesby batchwise incubation of1 mlofserumwith 0.5ml of virusproteinbeads

over-nightat4°Con atumblingapparatus.The finalsera,

diluted 10-foldbytheabsorptionprocess, were

clari-fiedby centrifugationat100,000x gfor 1 h andstored at-200C.

Antisera used fortype-specific radioimmunoassays

were 101p ofafinaldilution of1:120of rabbit antise-rumtoGross virus absorbed with WN1802B proteins (Gross assay) or1:210dilution of rabbit antiserumto WN1802B virus absorbed with Gross virus proteins (WN1802B assay). Interspecies assays ofp30's were

done with p30 purified from Scripps virus and goat antiserumtofelineleukemia virus(OS 268) provided byR. Wilsnackthroughthe Office of Resourcesand Logistics, National CancerInstitute. Targetproteins

wereradioiodinatedwith chloramine-Ttospecific

ac-tivities of 10to20lsCi/,ugandantigen-binding capaci-ties,andradioimmunoassays wereperformedas

pre-viously described (8,16). RESULTS

Type-specific p30 radioimmunoassays.

Rabbit antisera to GrossorWN1802Bviruswere absorbed with viralproteinoftheoppositetype

to remove cross-reactive antibody populations.

Although theserashowsomepreference in

an-tigen-binding capacityfor the immunizing pro-tein before absorption (Table 1), the sera, as

finally absorbed, arespecific for thep30ofthe

immunizingvirus inthatnobinding capacity for thep30of theabsorbing viruscouldbedetected. Homologous radioimmuneassaysfor Gross and

WN1802Bvirusp30'swereestablishedbyuseof these absorbed sera (Fig. 1). Competition of Gross virusp30intheWN1802Bassaywas 200-fold less than that forthehomologousp30(Fig.

TABLE 1.p30antigen-binding capacities ofrabbit antiserum

Binding capacity (yLg/ml) Antiserumto Absorbedwith

Grossp3 WN1802B

p30

WN1802B 50 80

WN1802B Gross <0.1 10.5

Gross 72 27

Gross WN1802B 6.1 <0.1

80

-

60-

40-20

-0

100-_

80-z 60

7

40-z

20-0

100-

80-

60-

40-

20-0

001 0 1o0 10.0 100.0 tOOO.O

INHIBITOR CONCN (ng)

FIG. 1. Radioimmunoassays of ecotropic virus p30's. (A) Goat antiserum to feline leukemia virus reactingwith '25I-labeled p30 from Moloney leukemia virus. Competing virusproteins wereMoloney (0),

WN1802B (0), and Gross (A). (B) Absorbed rabbit antiserum to WN1802B virus reacting with '25I-la-beledp30 from WN1802B virus. (C)Absorbedrabbit antiserum to Gross virus reacting with '25I-labeled p30 fromGross virus.(BandC) Competingpure p3o's from WN1802B (0)orGross(A).

1B), even though these proteins scored equally wellin theinterspeciesassay(Fig. 1A).

Compe-tition pfWN1802B p30 in the Gross assay was

1,000-foldless than that for Grossp30 (Fig. 1C). Sincep30'shavebeenimplicatedastargetsof Fv-1 restriction (3, 6),wesurveyedseveral

eco-tropic viruses of different host ranges to see whether thetype-specific determinant(s) meas-ured by these assayswere relatedtovirus

tro-pism (i.e., do all N-tropic viruses score in the GrossassayanddoallB-tropicvirusesscorein the WN1802B assay?). The results in Table 2 show that this is not thecase.All virusesscoring

in the WN1802B assay do so nearly

quantita-tively. Differences inquantitation betweenp30

detected bytheinterspecies andWN1802B

as-saysweresmall(±20%) unlessassays were

per-formed with labeled p30 preparations thathad been stored for long times. Virus preparations

A Interspecies assay

Mobney (o) WN1802B P30 (e)

GrossvirusP30(a) '

B WN1802B assay

C Grossassay

/

6/o

I I

X~

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

[image:2.505.64.253.577.664.2]
(3)
[image:3.505.53.246.94.363.2]

VOL. 30, 1979

TABLE 2.p30 competition radioimmunoassaysof

ecotropic virus isolates

Apparent p30(ng/mJ)b

Vinx8e Fv-1

tro-Interspe- Gross

WN1802B

Psm cies

Gross 1,213 1,568 18 N

WN1802B 709 <6 768 B

Moloney 177 8 10 NB

TOR-N 1,488 32 15 N

TOR-B 498 10 10 B

Scripps 62 <6 17 NB

BETH-N no. 1,644 9 15 N

1

BETH-B no. 1,184 6 1,088 B

1

Rauscher 245 21 <8 NB

BTL 365 <6 16 B

ETC18 1,122 <6 1,184 B

M138 2,112 <3 1,600 B

WN1802N 108 <3 2 N

MON-B 1,920 <3 1,184 B

MON-N 1,088 <3 2 N

CCL64-Xeno 370 <3 <1

AKR 1,440 54 23 N

BETH-N no. 1,184 9 5 N

2

BETH-B no. 1,120 <5 1,760 B 2

a

Viruses

tested as infected SC-1

cell

supernates. Values in interspecies assay correlate roughly with virustiters.

bValues expressed as nanograms permilliliter rela-tive to standard purifiedp30'sof theappropriatetype.

Interspecies assay detects total p30, whereas Gross andWN1802Bassays detectonly p30'scarrying

type-specific determinants.

whosep30 could be detected bythe WN1802B assayweresubsequentlyidentifiedasprogenyof WN1802Bstocks.One exception, M138,was iso-lated from alymphoma of aged BALB/c mice (5). It ispossiblethatthis virusisolate is

iden-tical to WN1802B, because it contains a p30

whichisimmunologicallyindistinguishable from that ofWN1802Band is ofsimilarorigin.Virus

ETC18, which is cloned from WN1802B virus

(12), has a p30 that migrates faster in

SDS-PAGEthan does thep30from its parent stock.

Sinceit competescompletelyandquantitatively

inthe WN1802B assay, thetype-specific

deter-minant(s)measuredby this assayare notrelated

to the large size ofstock WN1802B p30. The

onlyvirus thatscoredsignificantly in the Gross assay was Gross virus. Even the closely related AKR virus showed little cross-reactivity. Thus, both assays measure determinants that are uniquetothe individualvirusand notrelated to

Fv-1tropism.

Pseudotype virus characterization.

MuSV pseudotype viruses fromA1-2were

prop-agatedand titrated for focus formation or XC

plaqueformationonSC-1 cells (Table 3). Each

of thepseudotype preparationshasahigher XC

titerthan focus titer. Proteins from viruses

pu-rified from infected SC-1 cell supernatantswere compared on SDS-PAGE. Figure 2 shows that protein profiles of pseudotype viruses MuSV

(Gross), slot 3; MuSV (Moloney), slot 6; and

MuSV (WN1802B), slot 8differ from those of theirrespectivehelpervirusesGross,slots 2 and

7;Moloney,slot 5; andWN1802B,slots4and9.

Differences are apparent in the 60,000- to

70,000-molecular-weight regionof the gel, where

pro-nounced bands are present in the profiles of

pseudotype preparations [especially MuSV

(Gross), slot 3] but absent from those of the

helper viruses. Furthernore, protein banding

patterns of the MuSVpseudotypes differ from thoseoftXeirhelperviruses in the

low-molecu-lar-weight region of the gel (10,000 to 20,000),

again indicating that sarcoma genome-coded

proteins are present. Finally, adouble band of p30 is noted inMuSV(Gross),slot3.The

faster-migratingband appears identicaltoGross virus

p30 and represents 10 to 30% ofthe total stain intensity, whereasthe slower band has no coun-terpart inthehelper preparation (slot 2) and is

presumably derived fromsarcoma. Nop30

het-erogeneitycanbeseenin theproteinprofilesof

the other two MuSV pseudotypes, since the

helpervirusp30'shave mobilities very similarto

that of the sarcoma virus. To establish that

MuSV (WN1802B) contains two p30's and to

quantitatetherelativeamountsofeach,we

per-formedinterspeciesandtype-specificassayson

thesameviruspreparation.Table4showsthat

helper p30comprises8 to18%of the totalp30in

MuSV(Gross),which is ingoodagreementwith

estimates fromSDS-PAGEanalysis. Helper p30

represents17to48% of MuSV(WN1802B). As-saysonthefirstexperimentrepresentlow levels of p30, and the two subsequent experiments

indicatethathelpervirusp30contents are 17 to

18%forMuSV(Gross)and38 to48% forMuSV

(WN1802B). Since the

helper

virus

p30's give

nearlythe same orslightly highervalues in the

interspeciesasin thetype-specific assay

(Table

2), thedifferencesinvalues obtained in thetwo

assaysfor thepseudotype p30contentsare

rea-sonable estimates of the amount of sarcoma

virusp30present.

DISCUSSION

The mechanism ofhelpervirusrescue of the

sarcoma function is largely unknown. Since

some sarcoma preparationshavenoassociated gag gene (18), it is clear thatsrcgenesarenot

obligatorilylinkedtostructuralproteingenesfor

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(4)

732

TABLE 3. Biological assays ofpseudotypes on SC-I cellsa

Focus-forming units or XC plaques atlog,odilution

Virusprepn Assay Titer

1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.7

MuSV(Gross) Focus 23 10 6 2 1 0 3.0

forming

XCplaques 38 19 12 6 3 1 0 4.0

MuSV Focus TNb TN TN 75 28 12 6 3 1 5.31

(WN1802Fij forming

XCplaques 146 86 37 18 7 3 2 1 5.7

MuSV Focus 57 23 14 8 4 5.3

(Moloney) forming

XC plaques TN TN 60 29 10 5 6.4

Allwork doneat1 cells/wellattimeof infection with1mlof stock virus grown onSC-Icells.Counts are average of two wells in a 4-day assay.

bToonumeroustocount.

[image:4.505.120.403.235.409.2]

i- .. ..w

FIG. 2. Acrylamide gradient (4 to 17%) SDS-PAGE analysis of viral proteins stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Markerproteins slots 1 and 10:phosphorylase A, 96,000; bovine serum albumin, 68,000;

ovalbumin,45,000;myoglobin, 17,000; and horse heartcytochrome c, 12,000. Gross helper virus, slots 2 and 7; WN1802B helper virus, slots 4 and 9; Moloney helper virus, slot 5; MuSV-Gross, slot 3; MuSV-Moloney leukemia virus, slot 6; and MuSV-WN1802B, slot 8.

activity. Helper virus genes must be able to

supply the protein functionsnecessaryfor sar-coma gene transmission. However, since the kindsandamountsofgag geneinformation

pres-entinaparticularsarcoma arepassedtoprogeny

viruses, it follows that thesrcgene mustremain

linked to "original" helper virus genes and

re-combination with rescuing helper virus is not necessaryfortransmission.

Protein profiles of pseudotype preparations studied here are significantly different in the

65,000- as well as 10,000- to

20,000-molecular-weightregions of gels.TheMuSV(Gross) prep-arationalso has two distinct bandsin the p30 region of the gel,oneof which has been identified

withGross virusp30,and the otherof whichis

presumably ofsarcomavirusorigin.

Correlation ofinterspecies and type-specific

radioimmuneassays forp30'softhepseudotype

preparations indicate that less than 50% of the

p30presentis thehelpervirustype.The major-ity of the p30reactivitymustbesarcomavirus specified. This reactivitymaybepresent asp30

determinants on a gag precursor molecule as

well as on sarcoma p30 molecules. It is clear from SDS-PAGE, however, that at least some sarcoma p30 is present in the MuSV (Gross)

preparation.

We cannot determine which p30 helper or sarcomaisassociated withsrcgenevirions,

al-though much indirect evidence indicates that virus proteinsare packagedin a mixed fashion during maturation (10, 13). It is

possible

that

associationof viral RNA withsarcomap30 gen-erates adefectivevirus and thattheonlyactive virus seen is that small fraction which is

ran-domly associatedwithamajority ofhelperp30.

Thelargeamountofdefectiveparticlesinall

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(5)
[image:5.505.53.247.78.303.2]

PSEUDOTYPE VIRUS PROTEINS 733

TABLE 4. Quantitationof helper virus p30in

pseudotyJpeviruw preparations Apparentp30(ng/ml)b

Pseudotypea Interspe-

Gross

WN1802B %Helper

P

cies

Gross

no. 1 57 4.4 <1 8

no. 2 1120 194 7 17

no. 3 549 97 <5 18

WN1802B

no. 1 57 <2 9.9 17

no.2 1280 16 613 18

no. 3 552 5 211 38

Moloney

no. 1 79 <2 <1 NAC

no. 2 1440 23 4 NA

no.3 1472 10 <5 NA

aTested asdilutions of purified virus stocks. bSee footnote b, Table 2.

Not applicable since no type-specific assay for

Moloneyvirusp30 isavailable,and, thus,helper virus p30 cannot bequantitated.

type virus preparations could easily accommo-date thismodel.Sincethere is as yet no known function for any of the gag geneproducts, in-dependent tests ofactivityof the helper-versus-sarcomavirusp30'sare notpossible.

It isinteresting to note that although sarcoma

p30is present inlargeramountsthanhelperp30

in both MuSV (Gross) and MuSV (WN1802B)

preparations, theplaquetiter of each is greater

than the focus-forming titer. If p30 src deter-mined focus-formingproperties and p30helper determined XC plaque titer, one should find a correlation of these titers with protein content ofthe pseudotype preparations. However,if

ra-tios of p30 src/p30 helper are compared with

focus-forming titer/XC titer for both

pseudo-types, no quantitative correlation is apparent. Thus, p30 probably does not determine XC

plaqueorfocusformationproperties.The

mech-anism by which pseudotypes can acquire Fv-1

determinantsis not known but involves a

deter-minant other than gp7Osince this virion com-ponent does notdetermineFv-1 host range (7).

Although p30 has been implicated as an Fv-1

determinant,confirmationcannot bemade from

ourstudies.

Although type-specific determinants are

known to exist on

p30's

(2, 12), the extreme specificityoftheseassays was not expected. The Grossassay doesnot detect AKR

p30,

although Gross virus was presumably derived from the

AKRmouse. TheWN1802B assay iscompletely negative forWN1802N virus isolatedalso from BALB/c mice; furthermore, several other

B-tropic virusesdonot scorein the assay. This in

itself does not preclude p30 as the Fv-1 gene target,since aparticular rabbit antiserum may not recognizeputativeFv-1-specificsites on the molecule. Furthermore, since WN1802B virus p30 is somewhat larger than p30's from other

viruses,it ispossiblethattype-specific

determi-nantsresidein thisareaof theprotein. However,

the fact that ETC18 virus, cloned from WN1802B(12) but withasmaller p30(Tennant

etal.,manuscriptinpreparation),scoresin this

assayindicates that typespecificityof Fv-1 host range is not necessarily associated with the larger-sized p30.

If xenotropic viruses have xenotropic coats

with B-virus gag proteins, as suggested by

Gautschet al. (3), theyshould contain B-virus

p30. Twoxenotropic viruses ofBALB/c origin

didnotcompete in theWN1802B assay, and if

the theoryis correct, these viruses must have

obtained their p30 from a different B-tropic

BALB/cvirus.

M138 virus fromaBALB/clymphomahasa

p30that scores in theWN1802B assay, and since WN1802B virus is an endogenous virus of BALB/cmice,this indicates thatgenetic infor-mationcodingfor thisproteinisactivatedfrom

theendogenousstate.Thesynthesis ofthis

pro-tein, monitored with thetype-specific

radioim-munoassay throughout the BALB/c life-span,

maycorrelatewithleukemogenesis.

Finally, type-specificassaysshould be useful

inidentifyingrecombinant viruses. Virus

prog-eny from a mixed infection can easily be screened fortropismandp30type. These data,

correlated with type-specific assays for other

gag geneproducts,shouldhelp pinpointthe site

ofintragenicrecombination.

Experiments

of this

nature to determine the relationship ofp30 to

Fv-1restrictionarein progress.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Wethank LindaFoote,FrankTsakeres,and FredMyerfor excellenttechnicalassistance,and Norma Kwaak for

manu-scriptpreparations. We appreciatehelpfulcriticisms of W. Yangand A. Brown.

This researchwassponsoredjointly byPublic Health Ser-vice contract 1 CP-6-0500 within the Virus CancerProgramof theNational Cancer Institute underInteragency Agreement 40-365-72and the Division of Biomedical and Environmental Research, U.S. Department ofEnergy, under contract W-7405-eng-26 with the UnionCarbideCorporation.

LITERATURE CITED

1. Aaronson,S.A.,J.R.Stephenson,S.Hino,and S. R. Tronick. 1975.Differentialexpressionofhelperviral structuralpolypeptides incelia transformedby clonal isolates ofwoolly monkey sarcoma virus. J. Virol. 16: 1117-1123.

2. Boiocchi, M.,and R.C. Nowinski.1978.Polymorphism in themajor core protein (p30) of murine leukemia viruses asidentified by mouse antisera. Virology 84:

530-535.

VOL. 30, 1979

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

(6)

734

3. Gautsch,J.W., J. H.Elder,F.C.Jensen, and R. A. Lerner. 1978. The major core protein ofmammalian type C RNA tumor viruses: a conservedgene product withinterspecies genetic mobility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.75:4170-4174.

4. Gazdar,A. F., E. K. Russell, and J. Minna. 1975. Biologicalproperties of a type C virus isolated from a human x mousehybridcell line (38880). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.Med. 149:688-692.

5. Gillespie,G. Y., F.C.Jensen, and S. W. Russell. 1978. B-tropiconcornavirusproduction by BALB/c methyl-cholanthrene-inducedsarcoma cells. Int.J. Cancer 21: 234-238.

6. Hopkins, N., J. Schindler, and R.Hynes. 1977.Six NB-tropic murineleukemiaviruses derived from a B-tropic virus of BALB/c have altered p30. J. Virol. 21: 309-318.

7. Huang, A.S.,P.Besmer, L.Chu,and D.Baltimore. 1973. Growth ofpseudotypes of vesicular stomatitis virus withN-tropic murineleukemia virus coats incells resistant to N-tropic viruses. J. Virol. 12:659-662. 8. Kennel, S.J. 1976.Purification of aglycoproteinfrom

mouseascitesfluid byimmunoaffinity chromatography whichis related to themajorglycoprotein of murine leukemia viruses:immunologic and structural compar-ison withpurified viral glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 251:6197-6204.

9. Otten, J. A., F. E. Myer, R. W.Tennant, and A. Brown. 1978. Effect of the Fv-1 locus in vivo: Host range pseudotypesofmurine sarcoma virus. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60:875-880.

10.Pang, R.H.,L A.Phillips,and D. K.Haapala.1977. Characterization ofGazdar murine sarcoma virusby nucleic acidhybridizationandanalysisofviral expres-sion incells. J. Virol. 24:551-556.

11. Parks,W.P., R. S.Howk,A.Anisowicz,and E. M.

Scolnick.1976.Deletion mapping of Moloney type C virus:polypeptide and nucleic acid expression in differ-enttransformingvirusisolates. J.Virol. 18:491-503. 12. Pfeffer, L,T.Pincus, and E. Fleissner. 1976.

Polymor-phism ofendogenousmurineleukemia virusesrevealed by isoelectric focusing inpolyacrylamidegels.Virology 74:273-276.

13.Rein, A., S. V. S.Kashmiri,R.H. Bassin, B.L.Gerwin, and G. Duran-Troise. 1976. Phenotypic mixing be-tween N- orB-tropic murine leukemiaviruses: infec-tiousparticleswith dual sensitivity to Fv-1 restriction. Cell7:373-379.

14. Robbins,K.C.,H.Okabe,S. R.Tronick,R. V.Gilden, and S. A. Aaronson. 1978. Molecular mechanisms involved in thedifferential expression of gag gene prod-uctsby clonal isolates of a primate sarcoma virus. J. Virol.25:471478.

15. Sarma, P. S., T. Log, and A. F.Gazdar.1973.Control of group-specific antigen synthesis by the defective Gazdar murine sarcoma virus genome.Virology 52:568-573.

16. Strand, M., and J. T. August. 1974. Structural proteins ofmammalian oncogenic RNA viruses: multiple anti-genic determinants of the majorinternalprotein and envelope glycoprotein. J. Virol. 13:171-180.

17.Strand, M., andJ. T.August.1976.Structuralproteins ofribonucleicacid tumor viruses. Purification of enve-lope,core,andinternalcomponents.J. Biol. Chem. 251: 559-564.

18.Tronick, S.R.,C.D.Cabradilla, S. A. Aaronson, and W. A. Haseltine. 1978. 5'-Terminal nucleotide se-quencesof mammalian type Chelper viruses are con-served in the genomes ofreplication-defective mam-maliantransformingviruses.J. Virol.26:570-576.

on November 10, 2019 by guest

http://jvi.asm.org/

Figure

FIG.1.p30's.p30fromreactingantiserumbeledvirus.antiserumWN1802B Radioimmunoassaysof ecotropicvirus (A) Goat antiserum to feline leukemia virus with '25I-labeledp30 from Moloney leukemia Competing virus proteins were Moloney (0), (0), and Gross (A)
TABLE 2. p30 competition radioimmunoassays ofecotropic virus isolates
FIG. 2.leukemiaovalbumin,WN1802Bbrilliant Acrylamide gradient (4 to 17%) SDS-PAGE analysis of viral proteins stained with Coomassie blue
TABLE 4. Quantitation of helper virus p30 inpseudotyJpe viruwpreparations

References

Related documents

The second is a Long Short-Term Memory network (LSTM) ( ? ), a recurrent neural network, which is able to learn the kind of long-term temporal structures required in music

Living with dementia for the participating Iranian immi- grants in Sweden meant living with forgetfulness, feeling incompetent but still loved and feeling confident and se- cure

(2014) On finite-time ruin probabilities in a generalized dual risk model with dependence.. (2015) Modeling Finite-Time Failure Probabilities in Risk

Many socio-technical systems consist of a large number of partly autonomous local systems with local self-management and possibly intelligence that may be strongly or

It is useful to recall here that the mean secondary flow induced by the crestline cur- vature significantly alters the characteristics of the separated shear-layer at the

Straight ridges and hairpin buds are not found in Vero cells acutely infected with the SSPE Mantooth strain or in human prostate cells acutely infected with the SSPE Halle strain,

The cytoplasm of the lower cell contains nucleocapsids of which one is associated with the plasma membrane as though in an early stage of budding (arrow). (b) The surface of an

In terms of the probability analysis based on the Weibull distribution model for all wave run-ups at. different locations and wave headings, those estimated using LH-moments at