• No results found

Polylogarithmic connections with Euler sums

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Polylogarithmic connections with Euler sums"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Vol.12 (24), No.1, (2016), 17–32

POLYLOGARITHMIC CONNECTIONS WITH EULER SUMS

ANTHONY SOFO

Abstract. Polylogarithmic functions are intrinsically connected with sums of harmonic numbers. In this paper we explore many relations and explicitly derive closed form representations of integrals of polylogarith-mic functions and the Lerch phi transcendent in terms of zeta functions and sums of alternating harmonic numbers.

1. Introduction and preliminaries

In this paper we will develop identities, new families of closed form rep-resentations of alternating harmonic numbers and reciprocal binomial coef-ficients, including integral representations, of the form:

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 1−x 3F2

1,1,2 2 +k,2 +k

−x

dx (1.1)

fork ≥1 and where 3F2

·,·,· ·,·

z

is the classical generalized

hypergeo-metric function, also for integrals of the form

Z 1 0

xln2(x)

1−x Φ (−x,2,1 +r) dx

where Φ (z, t, a) =P∞ m=0 z

m

(m+a)t is the Lerch transcendent defined for|z|<1

and R(a)>0 and satisfies the recurrence

Φ (z, t, a) =z Φ (z, t, a+ 1) +a−t.

2010Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 05A10, 05A19, 33C20; Secondary: 11B65, 11B83, 11M06.

Key words and phrases. Polylogarithm function, integral representation, Lerch tran-scendent function, alternating harmonic numbers, combinatorial series identities, summa-tion formulas, partial fracsumma-tion approach, binomial coefficients.

(2)

The Lerch transcendent generalizes the Hurwitz zeta function at z= 1,

Φ (1, t, a) = ∞

X m=0

1 (m+a)t

and the Polylogarithm, or de Jonqui`ere’s function, when a= 1,

Lit(z) := ∞

X m=1

zm

mt, t∈Cwhen |z|<1; R(t)>1 when |z|= 1.

Moreover

Z 1 0

Lit(px) x dx=

(

ζ(1 +t), forp= 1 (2−r1)ζ(1 +t), forp=1.

We also obtain identities for integrals of the typeR01 ln 2x Li

2(−x)+x−x 2 4

x3(1x) dx. LetRand Cdenote, respectively the sets of real and complex numbers and

let N:= {1,2,3, . . .} be the set of positive integers, andN0 :=N∪ {0}. A

generalized binomial coefficient λµ

(λ, µ ∈ C) is defined, in terms of the familiar gamma function, by

λ µ

:= Γ (λ+ 1)

Γ (µ+ 1) Γ (λ−µ+ 1), (λ, µ∈C),

which, in the special case whenµ=n, n∈N0,yields

λ

0

:= 1 and

λ n

:= λ(λ−1)· · ·(λ−n+ 1)

n! =

(−1)n(−λ)n

n! (n∈N),

where (λ)ν (λ, ν∈C) is the Pochhammer symbol. Let

Hn= n X r=1

1

r =γ+ψ(n+ 1), (H0:= 0) (1.2)

be thenthharmonic number. Here, as usual,γdenotes the Euler-Mascheroni constant and ψ(z) is the Psi (or Digamma) function defined by

ψ(z) := d

dz{log Γ(z)}=

Γ0(z)

Γ(z) or log Γ(z) =

Z z 1

ψ(t)dt.

A generalized harmonic number Hn(m) of order m is defined, for positive

integers nand m, as follows:

Hn(m):=

n X r=1

1

rm , (m, n∈N) and H (m)

(3)

in terms of integral representations we have the result

Hn(m+1) = (−1)

m

m!

Z 1 0

(lnx)m (1−xn)

1−x dx. (1.3)

In the case ofnon-integer values ofnsuch as (for example) a valueρ∈R, the generalized harmonic numbers Hρ(m+1) may be defined, in terms of the

Polygamma functions

ψ(n)(z) := d

n

dzn{ψ(z)}= dn+1

dzn+1{log Γ(z)} (n∈N0),

by

Hρ(m+1)=ζ(m+ 1) + (−1)

m

m! ψ

(m)(ρ+ 1) (1.4)

(ρ∈R\ {−1,−2,−3, . . .}; m∈N),

whereζ(z) is theRiemann zeta function. Whenever we encounter harmonic numbers of the formHρ(m)at admissible real values ofρ, they may be

evalu-ated by means of this known relation (1.4). In the exceptional case of (1.4) when m= 0, we may defineHρ(1) by

Hρ(1)=Hρ=γ+ψ(ρ+ 1) (ρ∈R\ {−1,−2,−3, . . .}).

We assume (as above) that

H0(m)= 0 (m∈N).

In the case of non integer values of the argument z= rq, we may write the

generalized harmonic numbers,Hz(α+1), in terms of polygamma functions H(α+1)r

q

=ζ(α+ 1) +(−1)

α

α! ψ

(α)

r q + 1

, r

q 6={−1,−2,−3, ...},

where ζ(z) is the zeta function. When we encounter harmonic numbers at possible rational values of the argument, of the formH(α)r

q they maybe

eval-uated by an available relation in terms of the polygamma functionψ(α)(z) or, for rational argumentsz= rq,and we also define

H(1)r

q =γ+ψ

r q + 1

, and H0(α)= 0.

(4)

Some specific values are listed in the books[16], [20] and [21]. Let us define the alternating zeta function

ζ(z) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1

nz = 1−2 1−z

ζ(z)

with −

ζ(1) = ln 2,

Sp,q+−= ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(p) nq .

For first order powers (p= 1),of harmonic numbers, Sitaramachandra Rao [12] gave, for 1 +q an odd integer,

2S1,q+−= (1 +q) −

ζ(1 +q)−ζ(1 +q)−2

q

2−1

X j=1

ζ(2j) ζ(1 +q−2j).

For the positive terms, [1] gave

X n=1

Hn(p)

nq = ζ(p)ζ(q) +

(−1)p (p−1)!

Z 1 0

lnp−1(t)Liq(t)

1−t dt

= ζ(p+q)− (−1)

q

(q−1)!

Z 1 0

lnq−1(t)Lip(t)

1−t dt, by symmetry.

Some results for sums of alternating harmonic numbers may be seen in the works of [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], [13], [14], [15], [17], [18], [22], [23], [24] and [25] and references therein.

The following lemma will be useful in the development of the main theo-rems.

Lemma 1. Let r be a positive integer and p∈N.Then:

r X j=1

(−1)j

jp =

1 2p

H(p)

[r

2]

+H(p)

[r−1 2 ]

−H(p) 2[r+1

2 ]−1

(1.5)

where [x] is the integer part of x.

Proof. The proof is given in the paper [19].

Lemma 2. The following identities hold. For 0< t≤1

tln2

1 +t t

= 2 ∞

X n=1

(−t)n+1Hn

(5)

and when t= 1,

ln22 = 2 ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn

n+ 1 =ζ(2)−2Li2

1 2

=:S1.

tln

1 +t t

= ∞

X n=1

(−t)n+1

n , hence

ln 2 = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1

n =

X n=1

1

n2n =

1 2

X n=1

Hn

2n. (1.7)

Also

M(0) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

n =

19

16ζ(4)− 3

4ln 2ζ(3), (1.8)

M(1) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n+ 1 =

3

4ln 2ζ(3)− 5 16ζ(4)

and

X(0) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n2 =

3

4ζ(2)ζ(3)− 21

32ζ(5), (1.9)

X(1) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

(n+ 1)2 = 51

32ζ(5)− 3

4ζ(2)ζ(3).

Proof. Firstly (1.6) and (1.7) are standard known results. Next from the

definition (1.3),

M(0) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

n =

1 2

Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x

X n=1

(−1)n+1(1−xn)

n dx

= 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x(ln 2−ln (1 +x))dx

= 19 16ζ(4)−

3

4ln 2ζ(3). Here we have used the integral result

Z 1 0

ln2x ln (1 +x) 1−x dx=

7

2ln 2ζ(3)− 19

8 ζ(4).

M(1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n+ 1 =

3

(6)

follows by a change of counter, also by the integral expression we deduce

Z 1 0

ln2x Li2(−x)

x(1−x) dx= 1

2ζ(2)ζ(3)− 51

16ζ(5), (1.10)

and hence, (1.8) follows. In a similar fashion

X(0) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n2 =

1 2

Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x

X n=1

(−1)n+1(1−xn)

n2 dx

= 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x

ζ(2)

2 −Li2(−x)

dx

= 1

2ζ(2)ζ(3)− 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2x Li2(−x) 1−x dx=

3

4ζ(2)ζ(3)− 21 32ζ(5).

X(1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

(n+ 1)2 = 51

32ζ(5)− 3

4ζ(2)ζ(3)

follows by a change of counter, or by the integral expression (1.10).

Lemma 3. Let r≥2 be a positive integer, defining

M(r) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n+r

then

M(r) = (−1)r+1M(1) + 3 (−1)

r

4

Hr−1−H

[r−1 2 ]

ζ(3)

+(−1)

r+1

2

H(2)

2[r

2]−1

−1

4

H(2)

[r−1 2 ]

+H(2)

[r−2 2 ]

ζ(2)

+ (−1)r

Hr(3)1+H(3)

2[r2]−1

− 1

8

H(3)

[r−1 2 ]

+H(3)

[r−2 2 ]

ln 2

+ (−1)r+1

r−1 X j=1

1

j3

Hj−H[j

2]

, (1.11)

(7)

Proof. By a change of counter

M(r) : = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n+r =

X n=1

(−1)nHn(3)1 n+r−1

= ∞

X n=1

(−1)n

n+r−1

Hn(3)− 1

n3

=−

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3) n+r−1 +

X n=1

(−1)n+1

n3(n+r1)

=−M(r−1) + 1

r−1 ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 n3 −

1

(r−1)2 ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 n2

+ 1

(r−1)3 ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1

n −

1

(r−1)3 ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1

n+r−1.

From Lemma 1 and using the known results,

M(r) =−M(r−1) + 3ζ(3) 4 (r−1)−

ζ(2) 2 (r−1)2 +

ln 2 (r−1)3

− (−1)

r

(r−1)3

ln 2 +Hr−1−H

[r−1 2 ]

. (1.12)

From (1.12) we have the recurrence relation

M(r) +M(r−1) = 3ζ(3) 4 (r−1)−

ζ(2) 2 (r−1)2 +

1 + (−1)r (r−1)3

ln 2

− (−1)

r

(r−1)3

H

[r−1 2 ]

−Hr−1

forr ≥2, and withM(0) andM(1) given by (1.8). The recurrence relation is solved by the subsequent reduction of the

M(r), M(r−1), M(r−2), . . . , M(1)

terms, finally arriving at the relation (1.11).

Lemma 4. For a positive integer r≥2, we have the identity

X(r) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

(8)

then

X(r) = (−1)r+1X(1) +3 (−1)

r+1 4 1 4 H(2)

[r−1 2 ]

+H(2)

[r−2 2 ]

−H(2)

2[r2]−1

ζ(3)

+ (−1)r

1 8

H(3)

[r−1 2 ]

+H(3)

[r−2 2 ]

−H(3)

2[r

2]−1

ζ(2)

+ 3 (−1)r

Hr(4)1− 1

16

H(4)

[r−1 2 ]

+H(4)

[r−2 2 ]

+H(4)

2[r

2]−1

ln 2

+ (−1)r

r−1 X j=1 3 j4

H[j

2]

−Hj+ 1

4j3

H(2)

[j

2]

−H(2)

[j+1 2 ]−

1 2

,

(1.13)

with X(0) and X(1) given by (1.9).

Proof. By expansion, and a change of counter

X(r) := ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

(n+r)2 = ∞

X n=1

(−1)nHn(3)−n13

(n+r−1)2 , then,

X(r) =−

X n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

(n+r−1)2 + ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1

n3(n+r1)2

=−X(r−1) + ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1

  

1 (r−1)2n3 −

2 (r−1)3n2 +

3 (r−1)4n

− 1

(r−1)3(n+r−1)2 −

3 (r−1)4(n+r−1)

  

X(r) =−X(r−1) + 3ζ(3) 4 (r−1)2 −

ζ(2)

(r−1)3 +

3 ln 2

(r−1)4 + (−1)

r

4 (r−1)3

H(2)

[r−1 2 ]

−H(2)

[r

2]− 1 2

+ 3 (−1)

r

4 (r−1)4

ln 2 +H[r−1 2 ]

−Hr−1

.

Hence we obtain the recurrence relation

X(r) +X(r−1) = 3ζ(3) 4 (r−1)2 −

ζ(2) (r−1)3 +

3 (1 + (−1)r) ln 2 (r−1)4 + 3 (−1)

r

4 (r−1)4

H[r−1

2 ]

−Hr−1

+ (−1)

r

4 (r−1)3

H(2)

[r−1 2 ]

−H(2)

[r

2]− 1 2

, (1.14)

for r ≥ 2, and with X(0) and (1) given by (1.9). The recurrence relation (1.14) is solved by the subsequent reduction of the

(9)

terms, finally arriving at the relation (1.13).

We know develop some integral identities for Lemma 3 and Lemma 4, namely:

Lemma 5. Forr ∈N, Z 1

0

xln2(x) 1−x 2F1

1,1 +r

2 +r

−x

dx

= (1 +r)

Hr

2 −Hr −1 2

ζ(3)−2 (1 +r)M(r) (1.15)

where M(r) is given by (1.11).

Proof. FromM(r) := P∞

n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

n+r and by the use of the integral

rep-resentation (1.3)

M(r) = 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2(x) 1−x

X n=1

(−1)n+1(1−xn)

n+r dx

= 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2(x) 1−x

   

Hr

2 −Hr−12

2 −

x 2F1

1,1 +r

2 +r

−x

1 +r

   

dx

= ζ(3) 2

Hr

2 −Hr−12

− 1

2 (1 +r)

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 1−x 2

F1

1,1 +r

2 +r

−x

dx

and by re-arrangement we obtain (1.15).

Remark 1. For the caser= 1,we have

Z 1 0

ln2x ln (1 +x)

x(1−x) dx= 7

2ln 2ζ(3)− 5 8ζ(4)

which is a modification of the integral used in Lemma 2. Forr= 3 we obtain the very slow converging integral

Z 1 0

ln2x 2x−x2−2 ln (1 +x) x3(1x) dx

= 5

4ζ(4)−7 ln 2ζ(3) + 7 2ζ(3)−

3

2ζ(2) + 8 ln 2− 1 4. The Wolfram on-line integrator yields no solution to this integral.

Lemma 6. Forr ∈N, Z 1

0

xln2(x)

1−x Φ (−x,2,1 +r) dx= ζ(3)

2

H(2)r

2

−H(2)r−1 2

(10)

whereX(r)is given by (1.13) andΦ (−x,2,1 +r)is the Lerch transcendent.

Proof. FromX(r) :=P∞

n=1

(−1)n+1Hn(3)

(n+r)2 and by the use of the integral

rep-resentation (1.3)

X(r) = 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2(x) 1−x

X n=1

(−1)n+1(1−xn) (n+r)2 dx

= 1 2

Z 1 0

ln2(x) 1−x

 

H(2)r

2

−H(2)r−1 2

4 −x Φ (−x,2,1 +r)

  dx

= ζ(3) 4

H(2)r

2

−H(2)r−1 2

−1

2

Z 1 0

xln2(x)

1−x Φ (−x,2,1 +r) dx

and by re-arrangement we obtain (1.16).

Remark 2. For the caser= 1,we have

Z 1 0

ln2x Li2(−x)

x(1−x) dx= 1

2ζ(2)ζ(3)− 51

16ζ(5) (1.17)

which is a modification of the integral used in Lemma 2. The Wolfram on-line integrator yields no solution to this integral.

The next few theorems relate the main results of this investigation, namely the integral and closed form representation of integrals of the type (1.1).

2. Integral and closed form identities

In this section we investigate integral identities in terms of closed form representations of infinite series of harmonic numbers of order three and in-verse binomial coefficients. First we indicate the closed form representation of

V (k, p, q) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) np n+k

k

q (2.1)

for six cases (k, p, q) = (k,0,1),(k,1,1),(k,2,1),(k,0,2),(k,1,2),(k,2,2),

and k≥1 is a positive integer.

Theorem 1. Let k ≥ 1 be real positive integer, then from (2.1) with p =

0,1,2 and q= 1 we have:

V (k,0,1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n+k

k

= k X r=1

(−1)1+rr

k r

(11)

V (k,1,1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n n+kk

= 19

16ζ(4)− 3

4ln (2)ζ(3)−

k X r=1

(−1)1+r

k r

M(r), (2.3)

and

V (k,2,1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n2 n+k

k

=

3ζ(2)ζ(3)

4 −

21ζ(5) 32

−Hk

19ζ(4) 16 −

3 ln 2ζ(3) 4

k X r=1

(−1)r krM(r)

r (2.4)

where M(r) is given by (1.11).

Proof. Consider the expansion

V (k,0,1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n+k

k

=

X n=1

(−1)n+1k!Hn(3)

(n+ 1)k

= ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1k!Hn(3) k X r=1

Θ (r)

n+r

where

Θ (r) = lim

n→−r (

n+r k Q r=1

(n+r)

)

= (−1)

1+r r k!

k r

. (2.5)

We can now express

V (k,0,1) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1k!Hn(3) k X r=1

Θ (r)

n+r

=

k X r=1

(−1)1+r r

k r

k X r=1

Hn(3)

n+r. (2.6)

From (1.11) we haveM(r),hence substituting into (2.6), (2.2) follows. The identities (2.3) and (2.4) follow in a similar fashion.

(12)

Theorem 2. Under the assumptions of Theorem 1, we have,

V (k,0,2) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n+k

k 2

=

k X r=1

r2

k r

2

(M(r) + 2 (Hr−1−Hk−r)X(r)), (2.7)

V (k,1,2) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n n+kk 2

= k 2

2k k

19ζ(4) 16 −

3 ln 2ζ(3) 4

k X r=1 r

k r

2 M(r)

+ 2

k X r=1

k r

2

(Hr−1−Hk−r)

19ζ(4) 16 −

3 ln 2ζ(3)

4 −M(r)−rX(r)

(2.8)

and

V (k,2,2) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n2 n+k

K 2

= k 2

2k k

3

4ζ(2)ζ(3)− 21 32ζ(5)

2k k

−1 19ζ(4)

16 −

3 ln 2ζ(3) 4

+

k X r=1

k r

2 M(r)

+ 2

k X r=1

k r

2

(Hr−1−Hk−r)   

3

4ζ(2)ζ(3)− 2 r

19ζ(4)

16 −

3 ln 2ζ(3) 4

−2132ζ(5) + 2rM(r) +X(r)

  

(2.9)

where M(r) is given by (1.11) andX(r) is given by (1.13).

Proof. Consider the expansion

V (k,0,2) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n+k

k

2 =

X n=1

(−1)n+1(k!)2 Hn(3)

(n+ 1)1+k2 =

X n=1

(−1)n+1(k!)2 Hn(3) k X r=1

Ω (r)

n+r +

∆ (r)

(n+r)2

(13)

where

Ω (r) = lim

n→−r (

(n+r)2

k Q r=1

(n+r)2

)

=

r k!

k r

2

and

∆ (r) = lim

n→−r d dn

(

(n+r)2

k Q r=1

(n+r)2

)

= 2

r k!

k r

2

(Hr−1−Hk−r).

We can now express

V (k,0,2) = ∞

X n=1

(−1)n+1(k!)2 Hn(3) k X r=1

Ω (r)

n+r +

∆ (r)

(n+r)2

and by substitution (2.7) follows. Similarly (2.8) and (2.9) follow using the

same technique.

The following integral identities can be exactly evaluated by using the alternating harmonic number sums in Theorems1 and 2. The following six integral identities are the main results of this paper.

Theorem 3. Let k be a positive integer, then we have:

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 2F1

1,2 2 +k

−x

1−x dx

= 2ζ(3) 2F1

1,2 2 +k

−1

−2 (1 +k)V (k,0,1) (2.10)

where V (k,0,1) is given by (2.2),

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 2F1

1,1 2 +k

−x

1−x dx

= 2ζ(3) 2F1

1,1 2 +k

−1

−2 (1 +k)V (k,1,1), (2.11)

where V (k,1,1) is given by (2.3),

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 3F2

1,1,1 2,2 +k

−x

1−x dx

= 2ζ(3)3F2

1,1,1 2,2 +k

−1

(14)

where V (k,2,1) is given by (2.4),

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 3F2

1,2,2 2 +k,2 +k

−x

1−x dx

= 2ζ(3) 3F2

1,2,2 2 +k,2 +k

−1

−2 (1 +k)2V (k,0,2) (2.13)

where V (k,0,2) is given by (2.7),

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 3F2

1,1,2 2 +k,2 +k

−x

1−x dx

= 2ζ(3) 3F2

1,1,2 2 +k,2 +k

−1

−2 (1 +k)2V (k,1,2) (2.14)

where V (k,1,2) is given by (2.8),

Z 1 0

xln2(x) 3F2

1,1,1 2 +k,2 +k

−x

1−x dx

= 2ζ(3) 3F2

1,1,1 2 +k,2 +k

−1

−2 (1 +k)2V (k,2,2) (2.15)

where V (k,2,2) is given by (2.9).

Proof. From the identity (1.3), we can write

X n=1

(−1)n+1 Hn(3) n+k k = 1 2 Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x

X n=1

(−1)n+1(1−xn)

n+k k

dx

= 1

2 (1 +k)

Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x      

2F1

1,2 2 +k

−1

−x2F1

1,2 2 +k

−x       dx. where2F1 ·,· · ·

is the generalized hypergeometric function. Since

1 2 (1 +k)

Z 1 0

ln2x

1−x 2F1

1,2 2 +k

−1

dx= ζ(3) 2 (1 +k) 2F1

1,2 2 +k

−1 ,

(15)

Remark 3. From Lemma 6 and Theorem 3 both the Lerch transcendent and the hypergeometric function introduce the polylogarithmic function

Li2(−x), from which we are able to evaluate their integrals. The follow-ing examples are given. From (1.16) with r = 1, we obtain (1.17). For

r= 2,

Z 1 0

ln2x (Li2(−x) +x) x2(1x) dx=

51

16ζ(5)− 1

2ζ(2)ζ(3)−3ζ(3)

+ζ(2)−12 ln 2 + 8.

Forr = 3,

Z 1 0

ln2x Li2(−x) +x−x

2

4

x3(1x) dx=

51

16ζ(5)− 1

2ζ(2)ζ(3) + 3 8ζ(3)

+5

8ζ(2)−12 ln 2 + 67

8 , and for r= 4

Z 1 0

ln2x

Li2(−x) +x−x42 +x93

x4(1x) dx=−

51 16ζ(5) +

1

2ζ(2)ζ(3)

+217 72 ζ(3)−

143 216ζ(2) +

328 27 ln 2−

16525 1944 . The Wolfram on-line integrator, yields no solution to these slow converging integrals.

References

[1] V. Adamchik and H. M. Srivastava,Some series of the zeta and related functions, Analysis, 18 (2) (1998), 131–144.

[2] J. M. Borwein, I. J. Zucker and J. Boersma,The evaluation of character Euler double sums, Ramanujan J., 15 (2008), 377–405.

[3] J. Choi and D. Cvijovi´c, Values of the polygamma functions at rational arguments, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 40 (2007), 15019–15028, Corrigendum, ibidem, 43 (2010), 239801 (1 p).

[4] J. Choi,Finite summation formulas involving binomial coefficients, harmonic num-bers and generalized harmonic numnum-bers, J. Inequal. Appl., 49 (2013), 11p.

[5] J. Choi and H. M. Srivastava,Some summation formulas involving harmonic numbers and generalized harmonic numbers, Math. Comput. Modelling, 54 (2011), 2220–2234. [6] M. W. Coffey and N. Lubbers,On generalized harmonic number sums, Appl. Math.

Comput., 217 (2010), 689–698.

[7] G. Dattoli and H. M. Srivastava,A note on harmonic numbers, umbral calculus and generating functions, Appl. Math. Lett., 21 (2008), 686–693.

(16)

[9] K. K¨olbig,The polygamma functionψ(x)forx= 1/4andx= 3/4, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 75 (1996), 43–46.

[10] H. Liu and W. Wang,Harmonic number identities via hypergeometric series and Bell polynomials, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 23 (2012), 49–68.

[11] I Mez˝o,Nonlinear Euler sums, Pacific J. Math., 272 (2014), 201–226.

[12] R. Sitaramachandrarao,A formula of S. Ramanujan, J. Number Theory, 25 (1987), 1–19.

[13] A. Sofo,Sums of derivatives of binomial coefficients, Adv. Appl. Math., 42 (2009), 123–134.

[14] A. Sofo,Integral forms associated with harmonic numbers, Appl. Math. Comput., 207 (2009), 365–372.

[15] A. Sofo,Integral identities for sums, Math. Commun., 13 (2008), 303–309.

[16] A. Sofo, Computational Techniques for the Summation of Series, Kluwer Aca-demic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2003.

[17] A. Sofo and H. M. Srivastava, Identities for the harmonic numbers and binomial coefficients, Ramanujan J., 25 (2011), 93–113.

[18] A. Sofo,Summation formula involving harmonic numbers, Anal. Math., 379 (2011), 51–64.

[19] A. Sofo,Quadratic alternating harmonic number sums, J. Number Theory, 154 (2015), 144–159.

[20] H. M. Srivastava and J. Choi,Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2001.

[21] H. M. Srivastava and J. Choi,Zeta andq-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, London and New York, 2012. [22] W. Wang and C. Jia,Harmonic number identities via the Newton-Andrews method,

Ramanujan J., 35 (2014), 263–285.

[23] C. Wei and D. Gong, The derivative operator and harmonic number identities, Ra-manujan J., 34 (2014), 361–371.

[24] T. C. Wu, S. T. Tu and H. M. Srivastava, Some combinatorial series identities as-sociated with the digamma function and harmonic numbers, Appl. Math. Lett., 13 (2000), 101–106.

[25] D. Y. Zheng,Further summation formulae related to generalized harmonic numbers, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 335 (1) (2007), 692–706.

(Received: March 22, 2015) Victoria University (Revised: June 22, 2015) P. O. Box 14428

Melbourne City Victoria 8001 Australia

References

Related documents

We have proposed an identity based aggregate signature schemes which uses a variant of schnorr signature, with no pairing operation, which is the first aggregate scheme without

In this section, the control and communication principle of the DGs and DSTATCOM is described. The main idea of reactive compensation in the proposed method lies in

For the organization and analysis of scientific productions, a semi-structured data collection instrument was used with items of: scientific production identification

The present paper compared the outcomes of lower back segment stabilization and Aussie current exercises in decreasing the pain’s framework and functional

We presented a detailed analysis of the following: reasons of networking between cities; motives driving the initiatives for the formulation of networking;

The ton1 mutants isolated in the progeny of selfed heterozygous plants can be divided into two groups: group 1 plants (70%) are homozygous for both translocated chromo-

A homoeologous region is defined by the positions of three (or more) pairs of duplicated RFLP loci, where one of the two markers comprising each pair mapped to a

these factors. Obviously, the sampling effects leading to genetic drift will be strongest when population size N is small. On the other hand, the inherent tendency to