• No results found

Internet Routing Protocols Lecture 01

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Internet Routing Protocols Lecture 01"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Internet Routing Protocols

Lecture 01

Timothy G. Griffin

Computer Lab

Cambridge UK

Advanced Systems Topics

Lent Term, 2008

Common View of the Telco

Network

(2)

Common View of the IP Network

(Layer 3)

IP routing is the little bit-o-smarts left in the IP

network layer

• Dynamic Routing protocols are used to

implement and maintain connectivity in the

Internet.

• Which protocols are used?

• How do they work?

• How do they behave?

• What are some of the fundamental

tradeoffs in the design space of routing

protocols?

(3)

3

Outline

• Lecture 1 : Routing vs. Forwarding.

Internet routing architecture

• Lecture 2: Intra-domain routing with

“shortest paths”. Link-state vs.

distance-vector.

• Lecture 3 : Inter-domain routing. The

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)

• Lecture 4 : BGP continued

• Lecture 5 : BGP dynamics

(4)
(5)

5

(6)

(Winter '02) (W in te r '0 2) (Summer '03) UW-Superior UW-Stout UW-River Falls Fox Valley TC UW-Oshkosh UW-Milwaukee UW-Parkside UW-Whitewater UW-Madison UW-Platteville UW-La Crosse UW-Eau Claire UW-Stevens Point UW-Green Bay Marshfield Rhinelander Rice Lake Clintonville Stiles Jct. Portage Dodgeville La Crosse Genuity OC-3 (155Mbps) DS-3 (45Mbps) T1 (1.5Mbps) OC-12 (622Mbps) (Summer '02) Qwest and Other Provider(s) (S umm er '02 ) Internet 2 & Qwest

! Peering - Public and Private

! Commodity Internet Transit

! Internet2

! Merit and Other State Networks

! National Education Network

! Regional Research Peers Wausau Gigabit Ethernet (Summer '02) (S um m er '0 3) Chicago - 1 Chicago - 2 (Winter '02) Chicago

wiscnet.net

GO BUCKY!

(7)

7

WorldCom (UUNet)

(8)

Telstra international

Charlotte Portland Providence Newark Cedar Knolls Syracuse Buffalo White Plains Rochester Columbia New Orleans Nashville Austin Houston Tulsa Oklahom a City Albuquerque Phoenix Anaheim Anaheim Las Vegas Salt Lake City Colorado Springs Milwaukee Detroit Columbus Cincinnati SeattleSpokane Portland Louisville Little Rock Jacksonville Ft. Lauderdale Miami Raleigh Richmond Denver Indianapolis Pittsburgh Baltimore Plymouth Atlanta Minneapolis Garden a Tampa San Bernardino Arlington Ft. Worth Rochelle Pk Honolulu Orlando Sherman Oaks Ojus Hamilton Square Silver Springs Wayne Chicago Rolling Meadows Omaha St Louis San Diego Anchorage, AK N X OC48 Backbone Node Gateway Node N X DS3 N X OC3 Remote Access Router

R Remote GSR Access Router

N X OC12 NX OC192 Cambridge Framingham Stamford Bridgepor t Grand Rapids Providence Glenvie w Albany Sacramento Oakland Redwood City San Jose San Francisco Chicago San Francisco Florissant Davenport Worcester Madison Camden, NJ Norcross New Brunswick Birmingham San Antonio Oak Brook South Bend Dayto n Bohemia Hartford San Juan PR W. Palm Beach Harrisburg Des Moines Memphis Greensboro Norfolk R Kansas City Akron R R R Los Angeles Dallas Wash. DC St. Paul Freehold R Manchester R R R Ft. Lauderdale Dunwoody

Note: Connectivity and nodes shown are targeted for deployment; actual deployment may vary. Maps should not be used to predict service availability. R R R Phil NYC Cleveland R R NYC-Bdwy Birmingham LA-Airport Blvd

AT&T IP Backbone

Year end 2001

Rev. 6-4-01
(9)

9

Architecture of Dynamic

Routing

AS 1

AS 2

BGP

EGP = Exterior Gateway Protocol.

Policy Based.

IGP = Interior Gateway Protocol.

Metric based.

OSPF, IS-IS, RIP, EIGRP (cisco)

Only one: BGP

The Routing Domain of BGP is the entire Internet

IGP

IGP

How many ASN are used today?

Jan 28. 2008

(10)

Routers Talking to Routers

(The “control plane”)

Routing info

Routing info

Routing computation is distributed among routers within a

routing domain

Computation of best next hop based on routing information

is the most CPU/memory intensive task on a router

Routing messages are

usually

not routed, but exchanged

via layer 2 between physically adjacent routers (internal

BGP and multi-hop external BGP are exceptions)

• Topology information is

flooded within the routing

domain

• Best end-to-end paths are

computed locally at each router.

• Best end-to-end paths

determine next-hops.

• Based on minimizing some

notion of distance

• Works only if policy is shared

and uniform

• Examples: OSPF, IS-IS

• Each router knows little about

network topology

• Only best next-hops are chosen

by each router for each

destination network.

• Best end-to-end paths result

from composition of all

next-hop choices

• Does not require any notion of

distance

• Does not require uniform

policies at all routers

• Examples: RIP, BGP

Link State

Vectoring

(11)

11

The Gang of Four

Link State

Vectoring

EGP

IGP

BGP

RIP

IS-IS

OSPF

22

The standard model

Physical

Network

DataLink

Transport

Application

Session

Presentation

Physical

Network

DataLink

Transport

Application

Session

Presentation

data sent

data received

(12)

23

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Version| IHL | Service Type | Total Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Identification |Flags| Fragment Offset | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Time to Live | Protocol | Header Checksum | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Source Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Destination Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Options | Padding | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

All Hail the IP Datagram!

H

E

A

D

E

R

D

A

T

A

1981, RFC 791

... up to 65,515 octets of data ...

: : | + | + | : : | + | + | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

shaded fields little-used today

24

IP Hour Glass

IP

Networking Technologies

Networking Applications

Frame

ATM

DWDM

SONET

email

Web

file transfer

Ethernet

FDDI

Multimedia

X.25

Remote Access

Voice

VPN

Minimalist network layer

TCP

(13)

13

Best Effort, Connectionless,

Connectivity

The is the fundamental service provided

by Internet Service Providers (ISPs)

All other IP services depend on connectivity:

DNS, email, VPNs, Web Hosting, …

IP traffic

135.207.49.8 192.0.2.153

26

IP is a Network Layer Protocol

Physical 1

Network

DataLink 1

Transport

Application

Session

Presentation

Network

Physical 1

DataLink 1

Physical 2

DataLink 2

Router

Physical 2

Network

DataLink 2

Transport

Application

Session

Presentation

Medium 1

Medium 2

Separate physical networks

glued together into one

logical network

(14)

27

Hosts, Networks, and Routers

Network A

Network B

Network C

Router

Host 1

Host 2

Host 7

Host 1

Host 12

Host 2

Unique IP Address =

Network Number + Host Number

28

Actually, IP addresses Identify

Interfaces

Network A

Network B

Network C

Host 1

Host 2

Host 7

Host 1

Host 12

Host 2

Network C,

Host 3

Network A,

Host 3

Network B,

Host 77

Machines can have more

than one IP address.

All routers do!

(15)

15

29

IP Forwarding Table

Destination

Next Hop

Interface

Net A

Net B

Net C, Host 3

Router 1

Direct

Router 2

Router 1

INT 7

INT 7

INT 3

INT 4

A destination is usually

a network. May also be

a host, or a “gateway

of last resort” (default)

The next hop is

either a directly

connected network or a

router on a directly

connected network

A physical interface

Net C

30

IP Forwarding Process

Forwarding Process

IP Forwarding Table

Router

1. Remove a packet from an input queue 3. Match packet’s destination to a table entry 2. Check for sanity, decrement TTL field 4. Place packet on correct output queue If queues get full, just drop packets!

If queues get full, just drop packets!

(16)

31

IPv4 Addresses are 32 Bit

Values

11111111 00010001 10000111 00000000

255

17

134

0

255.17.134.0

Dotted quad notation

IPv6 addresses have 128 bits

32

IP Addresses come in two

parts

11111111 00010001 10000111 00000000

Network Number

Host Number

Where is this dividing line?

Well, that depends ....

(17)

17

33

Classful Addresses

0nnnnnnn

10nnnnnn nnnnnnnn

nnnnnnnn nnnnnnnn

110nnnnn

hhhhhhhh hhhhhhhh hhhhhhhh

hhhhhhhh hhhhhhhh

hhhhhhhh

n = network address bit

h = host identifier bit

Class

A

Class C

Class B

Leads to a rigid, flat, inefficient use of address space …

34

RFC 1519: Classless Inter-Domain

Routing (CIDR)

IP Address : 12.4.0.0 IP Mask: 255.254.0.0

00001100 00000100 00000000 00000000

11111111 11111110 00000000 00000000

Address

Mask

for hosts

Network Prefix

Use two 32 bit numbers to represent a network.

Network number = IP address + Mask

(18)

Which IP Addresses are Covered by a

Prefix?

00001100 00000100 00000000 00000000

11111111 11111110 00000000 00000000

12.4.0.0/15

00001100 00000101 00001001 00010000

00001100 00000111 00001001 00010000

12.5.9.16

12.7.9.16

12.5.9.16 is covered by prefix 12.4.0.0/15

12.7.9.16 is not covered by prefix 12.4.0.0/15

36

CIDR allows Hierarchy in Addressing

12.0.0.0/8

12.0.0.0/16

12.254.0.0/16

12.1.0.0/16

12.2.0.0/16

12.3.0.0/16

:

:

:

12.253.0.0/16

12.3.0.0/24

12.3.1.0/24

:

:

12.3.254.0/24

12.253.0.0/19

12.253.32.0/19

12.253.64.0/19

12.253.96.0/19

12.253.128.0/19

12.253.160.0/19

12.253.192.0/19

:

:

:

(19)

19

Classless Forwarding

Destination =12.5.9.16

payload

Prefix

Next Hop

Interface

12.0.0.0/8 10.14.22.19

ATM 5/0/8

12.4.0.0/15

12.5.8.0/23 attached

Ethernet 0/1/3

Serial 1/0/7

10.1.3.77

IP Forwarding Table

0.0.0.0/0

10.14.11.33 ATM 5/0/9

even better

OK

better

best!

38

How Are Forwarding Tables

Populated to implement Routing?

Statically

Dynamically

Routers exchange network reachability

information using ROUTING PROTOCOLS.

Routers use this to compute best routes

Administrator

manually configures

forwarding table entries

In practice : a mix of these.

Static routing mostly at the “edge”

+ More control

+ Not restricted to

destination-based

forwarding

- Doesn’t scale

- Slow to adapt to

network failures

+ Can rapidly adapt to changes

in network topology

+ Can be made to scale well

- Complex distributed algorithms

- Consume CPU, Bandwidth, Memory

- Debugging can be difficult

(20)

39

Routing vs. Forwarding

R

R

R

A

B

C

D

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

E

Net

Nxt Hop

R4

R3

R3

R4

Direct

R4

Net

Nxt Hop

A

B

C

D

E

default

R2

R2

Direct

R5

R5

R2

Net

Nxt Hop

A

B

C

D

E

default

R1

Direct

R3

R1

R3

R1

Default to upstream router

A

B

C

D

E

default

Forwarding: determine next hop

Routing: establish end-to-end paths

Forwarding always works Routing can be badly broken

40

Happy Packets: The Internet Does Not Exist Only to

Populated Routing Tables

Forwarding Table

OSPF

Domain

RIP

Domain

BGP

OSPF Process

OSPF Routing tables

RIP Process

RIP Routing tables

BGP Process

BGP Routing tables

(21)

21

Before We Go Any Further

IP ROUTING PROTOCOLS DO NOT

DYNAMICALLY ROUTE AROUND

NETWORK CONGESTION

• IP traffic can be very bursty

• Dynamic adjustments in routing typically

operate more slowly than fluctuations in

traffic load

• Dynamically adapting routing to account

for traffic load can lead to wild, unstable

oscillations of routing system

42

Next Lecture: Shortest Path

Routing

This is what IS-IS, OSPF, and RIP do,

more or less.

A

D

E

C

B

100 100 20 20 35 35 20 20 20 20 10 10 10 10

55

35

20

30

Dest. Nxt Hop

B

C

C

C

D

D

D

E

References

Related documents

The SEC investigation noted that “compensation of Xerox senior management depended significantly on their ability to meet [earnings] targets.” Because of the accounting

Then, we perform an analysis of the classifier used to build the email-sending behavioral profiles, and we show how the behavioral profiles built by IdentityMailer are useful to

Library Watershed Connect is an online platform that serves as a centralized space to learn about the latest news and analyses surrounding natural water infrastructure invest-

As the Native Sense Gap decreases, the price of human translation will increasingly be affected by the quality of machine translation?. Native Sense Gap Spanish English English

Company can gain significant competitive advantage by efficiently managing the short, medium, and long-term payment flows and the resulting risk exposure. Tasks such as

The present study demonstrates the high degree of purity that can be obtained for the synchroniza- tion of in vitro cultures of Plasmodium falciparum, either on asexual or

Liquefaction Exploration and Production LNG Marketing and Trading Maritime transport4. around joint ventures

Job Description : The Wind Farm Project Manager position is a high level position; this position will oversee all aspects of the technical specialities of wind power