• No results found

Enoxacin hydro­iodide

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Enoxacin hydro­iodide"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2004). E60, o1051±o1053 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536804011948 Liang-Cai Yuet al. C15H18FN4O3+Iÿ

o1051

organic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports

Online ISSN 1600-5368

Enoxacin hydroiodide

Liang-Cai Yu,a,bHong Liang,a,b*

Chun-Shan Zhou,aZhen-Feng

Chenband Yong Zhangc

aCollege of Chemistry and Chemical

Engineering, Central-South University, Changsha 410012, People's Republic of China, bCollege of Chemistry and Chemical

Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, People's Republic of China, and cCollege of Chemistry and Chemical

Engineering, Suzhou University, Suzhou 215006, People's Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study T= 193 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.005 AÊ Rfactor = 0.042 wRfactor = 0.078

Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.5

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2004 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

The title compound, C15H18FN4O3+Iÿ, forms ionic crystals

consisting of protonated enoxacin cations, C15H18FN4O3+, and

Iÿanions. The naphthyridine system of the cation is essentially

planar, whereas the piperazine ring has a chair conformation; the enoxacin is protonated at the unsubstituted N atom of the piperazine ring. The carboxyl OH group forms an intramo-lecular hydrogen bond with the carbonyl O atom of the naphthyridine system, thus forming a six-membered pseudo-ring. The crystal packing is stabilized by±stacking of the naphthyridine rings and intermolecular hydrogen bonding involving the piperazine NÐH group, the carboxyl group of

the cation and the Iÿ anion, linking the residues of the

structure into in®nite chains running along the diagonal of the

acplane.

Comment

Enoxacin,

1-ethyl-6-¯uoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piper-azinyl)-1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxylic acid, is a synthetic antibacterial drug of the ¯uoroquinolone class, and is rapidly bactericidal against Gram-positive and -negative organisms

including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae

(Siporin & Towse, 1984). A number of such naphthyridine derivatives have been crystallographically characterized (Dattaet al., 1995); one of them,viz. nalidixic acid, has been studied several times (Achari & Neidle, 1976; Huber et al., 1980; Ohet al., 1986). However, as far as we are aware, the crystal structure of enoxacin has not been reported.

The ionic crystals of enoxacin of the title salt, (I), of enoxacin are composed of cations involving protonated quinolone groups and iodide anions (Fig. 1). Similar to what is observed in the structure of 6-chloro-1-ethyl-1,4-dihydro-4- oxo-7-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxyl-ic acid (Dattaet al., 1995), the bicyclic naphthyridine system is essentially planar, whereas the piperazine ring has a chair conformation. The unsubstituted N atom of the piperazine ring (N4) is protonated, while the carboxyl group is not dissociated. The ethyl group plane (N1, C10 and C11) is almost orthogonal to the mean plane of the naphthyridine system; the corresponding dihedral angle is 80.57 (19). All the

(2)

organic papers

o1052

Liang-Cai Yuet al. C15H18FN4O3+Iÿ Acta Cryst.(2004). E60, o1051±o1053

distances and angles within the rigid quinolone ring system and in the piperazine ring are similar to those found previously in related compounds (e.g. nalidixic acid and its derivatives; Achari & Neidle, 1976; Dattaet al., 1995; Huberet al., 1980; Ohet al., 1986).

The hydrogen bond O2ÐH2 O1, involving the carboxyl

OH group and the naphthyridine oxo atom, forms a six-membered pseudo-ring within the cation. The piperazine NH groups function as the donors of hydrogen bonds involving caboxyl O atoms and link neighbouring cations in the crystal structure; they also participate in hydrogen bonds with the Iÿ

anions (Table 2). Interionic hydrogen bonds link the residues in the structure of (I) into in®nite chains extending along the diagonal of theac plane of the unit cell (Fig. 2). The crystal

packing of (I) is also stabilized by ± stacking of the

napththyridine rings.

Experimental

Samples of 1.5 mmol of enoxacin (purchased from Fluka) and 1 mmol of PbI2were thoroughly mixed and placed in an autoclave. After

addition of 4 ml of EtOH and 12 ml of H2O (pH = 5.0), the autoclave

was heated at 373 K for 3 d to give light-yellow crystals of compound (I) in a 40% yield.

Crystal data C15H18FN4O3+Iÿ Mr= 448.23

Triclinic,P1

a= 6.9831 (17) AÊ

b= 10.235 (3) AÊ

c= 11.931 (3) AÊ

= 82.783 (11)

= 79.961 (11)

= 85.934 (12)

V= 832.0 (4) AÊ3

Z= 2

Dx= 1.789 Mg mÿ3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 3760

re¯ections

= 3.2±27.5

= 1.96 mmÿ1 T= 193 (2) K Irregular, light yellow 0.200.110.07 mm

Data collection Rigaku Mercury CCD

diffractometer

!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (Jacobson, 1998)

Tmin= 0.696,Tmax= 0.875

9442 measured re¯ections

3753 independent re¯ections 3401 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.037

max= 27.5 h=ÿ7!9

k=ÿ13!13

l=ÿ15!14 Re®nement

Re®nement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.042 wR(F2) = 0.078 S= 1.18 3753 re¯ections 227 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained re®nement

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0167P)2

+ 1.7702P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.55 e AÊÿ3

min=ÿ0.64 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Selected bond distances (AÊ).

C1ÐC3 1.480 (5) C2ÐC3 1.376 (5) C3ÐC4 1.432 (5) C4ÐC9 1.432 (5) C5ÐC6 1.351 (5) C5ÐC9 1.411 (5) C6ÐC7 1.420 (5) C8ÐC9 1.395 (5) C10ÐC11 1.509 (5) C12ÐC13 1.507 (6) C14ÐC15 1.510 (6) F1ÐC6 1.369 (4) O1ÐC4 1.275 (4)

O2ÐC1 1.326 (5) O3ÐC1 1.214 (5) N1ÐC2 1.340 (5) N1ÐC8 1.398 (5) N1ÐC10 1.488 (5) N2ÐC8 1.331 (5) N2ÐC7 1.339 (5) N3ÐC7 1.365 (5) N3ÐC12 1.466 (5) N3ÐC15 1.467 (5) N4ÐC13 1.490 (5) N4ÐC14 1.491 (6)

Table 2

Hydrogen-bonding geometry (AÊ,).

DÐH A DÐH H A D A DÐH A

O2ÐH2 O1 0.84 1.65 2.442 (4) 156 N4ÐH4B I1i 0.84 (5) 2.61 (5) 3.421 (4) 163 (4)

N4ÐH4A O2ii 0.91 (6) 2.02 (6) 2.880 (5) 156 (5)

N4ÐH4A O3ii 0.91 (6) 2.39 (6) 3.182 (5) 145 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) 1ÿx;1ÿy;2ÿz; (ii)xÿ1;y;1‡z.

H atoms bonded to C and O atoms were positioned geometrically; they were treated as riding, with CÐH = 0.93 AÊ, OÐH = 0.84 AÊ and

Uiso(H) = 1.2eq(C) or 1.5eq(O). H atoms bound to atom N4 were

located in a difference map and re®ned isotropically; NÐH = 0.84 (5) and 0.91 (6) AÊ.

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 1999); cell re®nement:

CrystalClear; data reduction:CrystalStructure(Rigaku and Rigaku/ MSC, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97 (Shel-drick, 1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Siemens, 1994); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

The authors thank the Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, and the Project of One Hundred Persons Plan of Guangxi Universities of the People's Republic of China, as well as the Teaching and Research Award Program for Outstanding Young Teachers in

Figure 2

A packing diagram for compound (I). Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.

Figure 1

(3)

Higher Education Institutions of the Chinese Ministry of Education.

References

Achari, A. & Neidle, S. (1976).Acta Cryst.B32, 600±602.

Datta, M., Hannan, S. S. & Talukdar, A. N. (1995).Acta Cryst.C51, 978±980. Huber, C. P., Gowda, D. S. S. & Acharya, K. R. (1980).Acta Cryst.B36, 497±

499.

Jacobson, R. (1998). Private communication to Rigaku. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Oh, I.-K., Ko, T.-S., Lee, C.-B., Suh, J.-I. & Suh, I.-H. (1986).Chung.J. Sci.13, 51±58.

Rigaku & Rigaku/MSC (2000). CrystalStructure. Rigaku/MSC, 9009 New Trails Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77381, USA, and Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Rigaku (1999).CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of GoÈttingen, Germany.

Siemens (1994). XSCANS (Version 2.10b) and SHELXTL. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Siporin, C. & Towse, G. (1984).J. Antimicrob. Chemother.14, Suppl. C, 47± 55.

(4)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1051–o1053

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1051–o1053 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536804011948]

Enoxacin hydroiodide

Liang-Cai Yu, Hong Liang, Chun-Shan Zhou, Zhen-Feng Chen and Yong Zhang

(I)

Crystal data

C15H18FN4O3+·I−

Mr = 448.23

Triclinic, P1 Hall symbol: -P 1

a = 6.9831 (17) Å

b = 10.235 (3) Å

c = 11.931 (3) Å

α = 82.783 (11)°

β = 79.961 (11)°

γ = 85.934 (12)°

V = 832.0 (4) Å3

Z = 2

F(000) = 444

Dx = 1.789 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71070 Å Cell parameters from 3760 reflections

θ = 3.2–27.5°

µ = 1.96 mm−1

T = 193 K

Irregular, light yellow 0.20 × 0.11 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

Detector resolution: 7.31 pixels mm-1

ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (Jacobson, 1998)

Tmin = 0.696, Tmax = 0.875

9442 measured reflections 3753 independent reflections 3401 reflections with I > 2σ(I)′

Rint = 0.037

θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.2°

h = −7→9

k = −13→13

l = −15→14

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042

wR(F2) = 0.078

S = 1.18 3753 reflections 227 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0167P)2 + 1.7702P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(5)

supporting information

sup-2

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1051–o1053 Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)

treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

I1 0.70806 (4) 0.55328 (3) 0.77263 (2) 0.02814 (9)

F1 0.6576 (3) 0.9896 (3) 0.77860 (19) 0.0351 (6)

O1 0.9380 (4) 0.9109 (3) 0.3722 (2) 0.0274 (6)

O2 0.9727 (4) 0.8435 (3) 0.1801 (2) 0.0333 (7)

H2 0.9938 0.8720 0.2396 0.050*

O3 0.7482 (5) 0.7337 (4) 0.1287 (3) 0.0478 (9)

N1 0.4069 (4) 0.7437 (3) 0.4558 (3) 0.0187 (6)

N2 0.3579 (4) 0.8095 (3) 0.6379 (2) 0.0181 (6)

N3 0.2833 (5) 0.8713 (3) 0.8195 (3) 0.0263 (7)

N4 0.1901 (6) 0.6841 (4) 1.0144 (3) 0.0296 (8)

C2 0.5152 (5) 0.7386 (4) 0.3518 (3) 0.0212 (8)

H1 0.4663 0.6948 0.2979 0.025*

C3 0.6934 (5) 0.7937 (4) 0.3192 (3) 0.0202 (8)

C4 0.7735 (5) 0.8584 (3) 0.3988 (3) 0.0195 (7)

C9 0.6575 (5) 0.8610 (3) 0.5101 (3) 0.0184 (7)

C8 0.4758 (5) 0.8058 (3) 0.5377 (3) 0.0176 (7)

C5 0.7180 (5) 0.9236 (4) 0.5959 (3) 0.0215 (8)

H6 0.8401 0.9633 0.5825 0.026*

C6 0.5979 (6) 0.9257 (4) 0.6976 (3) 0.0226 (8)

C7 0.4142 (5) 0.8677 (3) 0.7204 (3) 0.0192 (7)

C1 0.8033 (6) 0.7866 (4) 0.2020 (3) 0.0300 (9)

C10 0.2179 (5) 0.6787 (4) 0.4870 (3) 0.0225 (8)

H10A 0.1672 0.6687 0.4163 0.027*

H10B 0.1226 0.7356 0.5330 0.027*

C11 0.2374 (6) 0.5451 (4) 0.5547 (3) 0.0261 (9)

H11A 0.3096 0.4831 0.5045 0.039*

H11B 0.1076 0.5131 0.5857 0.039*

H11C 0.3076 0.5522 0.6178 0.039*

C12 0.1057 (6) 0.7981 (4) 0.8363 (4) 0.0311 (10)

H12A 0.0722 0.7867 0.7609 0.037*

H12B −0.0038 0.8484 0.8787 0.037*

C13 0.1354 (6) 0.6649 (4) 0.9025 (3) 0.0296 (9)

H13A 0.0140 0.6167 0.9156 0.036*

(6)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1051–o1053

C14 0.3639 (6) 0.7647 (4) 1.0016 (4) 0.0322 (10)

H14A 0.4805 0.7163 0.9640 0.039*

H14B 0.3870 0.7810 1.0781 0.039*

C15 0.3303 (7) 0.8943 (4) 0.9304 (3) 0.0324 (10)

H15A 0.2218 0.9463 0.9718 0.039*

H15B 0.4487 0.9455 0.9178 0.039*

H4A 0.091 (9) 0.725 (6) 1.060 (5) 0.067 (18)*

H4B 0.212 (7) 0.614 (5) 1.056 (4) 0.038 (14)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

I1 0.03270 (15) 0.02672 (14) 0.02515 (14) 0.00166 (10) −0.00684 (10) −0.00252 (10)

F1 0.0350 (14) 0.0513 (16) 0.0232 (12) −0.0159 (12) −0.0041 (10) −0.0146 (11)

O1 0.0217 (14) 0.0316 (15) 0.0257 (14) −0.0063 (11) 0.0033 (11) 0.0014 (12)

O2 0.0341 (17) 0.0388 (18) 0.0227 (15) −0.0037 (13) 0.0083 (13) −0.0048 (13)

O3 0.050 (2) 0.072 (3) 0.0233 (16) −0.0148 (18) 0.0045 (15) −0.0189 (16)

N1 0.0200 (16) 0.0184 (15) 0.0179 (15) −0.0019 (12) −0.0022 (12) −0.0032 (12)

N2 0.0195 (15) 0.0184 (15) 0.0153 (15) −0.0020 (12) −0.0006 (12) −0.0002 (12)

N3 0.0263 (18) 0.0333 (19) 0.0187 (16) −0.0029 (14) 0.0001 (14) −0.0046 (14)

N4 0.033 (2) 0.030 (2) 0.0210 (18) 0.0032 (16) −0.0001 (16) 0.0056 (16)

C2 0.028 (2) 0.0204 (18) 0.0150 (17) 0.0034 (15) −0.0034 (15) −0.0019 (15)

C3 0.0229 (19) 0.0189 (18) 0.0172 (18) 0.0000 (15) −0.0004 (15) −0.0003 (15)

C4 0.0179 (18) 0.0167 (17) 0.0210 (18) 0.0017 (14) 0.0003 (15) 0.0020 (15)

C9 0.0202 (18) 0.0155 (17) 0.0174 (17) 0.0002 (14) −0.0008 (14) 0.0020 (14)

C8 0.0215 (18) 0.0128 (16) 0.0176 (17) 0.0011 (14) −0.0047 (15) 0.0026 (14)

C5 0.0219 (19) 0.0200 (18) 0.0214 (19) −0.0041 (15) −0.0027 (15) 0.0026 (15)

C6 0.027 (2) 0.0215 (19) 0.0200 (18) −0.0028 (15) −0.0041 (16) −0.0024 (15)

C7 0.0226 (19) 0.0153 (17) 0.0182 (18) 0.0006 (14) −0.0030 (15) 0.0023 (14)

C1 0.033 (2) 0.031 (2) 0.022 (2) 0.0030 (18) 0.0012 (18) −0.0001 (18)

C10 0.0171 (18) 0.028 (2) 0.0231 (19) −0.0049 (15) −0.0014 (15) −0.0062 (16)

C11 0.026 (2) 0.026 (2) 0.025 (2) −0.0079 (16) 0.0001 (17) −0.0011 (17)

C12 0.020 (2) 0.048 (3) 0.023 (2) −0.0005 (18) 0.0017 (16) 0.0004 (19)

C13 0.025 (2) 0.039 (2) 0.025 (2) −0.0061 (18) −0.0011 (17) −0.0042 (18)

C14 0.032 (2) 0.044 (3) 0.021 (2) −0.0043 (19) −0.0025 (17) −0.0049 (19)

C15 0.039 (2) 0.041 (3) 0.0182 (19) −0.011 (2) 0.0024 (18) −0.0115 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C3 1.480 (5) N3—C12 1.466 (5)

C2—C3 1.376 (5) N3—C15 1.467 (5)

C3—C4 1.432 (5) N4—C13 1.490 (5)

C4—C9 1.432 (5) N4—C14 1.491 (6)

C5—C6 1.351 (5) N4—H4A 0.91 (6)

C5—C9 1.411 (5) N4—H4B 0.84 (5)

C6—C7 1.420 (5) C2—H1 0.9500

C8—C9 1.395 (5) C5—H6 0.9500

(7)

supporting information

sup-4

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1051–o1053

C12—C13 1.507 (6) C10—H10B 0.9900

C14—C15 1.510 (6) C11—H11A 0.9800

F1—C6 1.369 (4) C11—H11B 0.9800

O1—C4 1.275 (4) C11—H11C 0.9800

O2—C1 1.326 (5) C12—H12A 0.9900

O2—H2 0.8400 C12—H12B 0.9900

O3—C1 1.214 (5) C13—H13A 0.9900

N1—C2 1.340 (5) C13—H13B 0.9900

N1—C8 1.398 (5) C14—H14A 0.9900

N1—C10 1.488 (5) C14—H14B 0.9900

N2—C8 1.331 (5) C15—H15A 0.9900

N2—C7 1.339 (5) C15—H15B 0.9900

N3—C7 1.365 (5)

C1—O2—H2 109.5 O3—C1—C3 124.6 (4)

C2—N1—C8 119.8 (3) O2—C1—C3 115.1 (4)

C2—N1—C10 120.8 (3) N1—C10—C11 112.1 (3)

C8—N1—C10 119.4 (3) N1—C10—H10A 109.2

C8—N2—C7 119.4 (3) C11—C10—H10A 109.2

C7—N3—C12 119.7 (3) N1—C10—H10B 109.2

C7—N3—C15 125.3 (3) C11—C10—H10B 109.2

C12—N3—C15 110.4 (3) H10A—C10—H10B 107.9

C13—N4—C14 113.0 (3) C10—C11—H11A 109.5

C13—N4—H4A 112 (4) C10—C11—H11B 109.5

C14—N4—H4A 107 (4) H11A—C11—H11B 109.5

C13—N4—H4B 115 (3) C10—C11—H11C 109.5

C14—N4—H4B 107 (3) H11A—C11—H11C 109.5

H4A—N4—H4B 103 (5) H11B—C11—H11C 109.5

N1—C2—C3 123.4 (3) N3—C12—C13 110.1 (3)

N1—C2—H1 118.3 N3—C12—H12A 109.6

C3—C2—H1 118.3 C13—C12—H12A 109.6

C2—C3—C4 119.9 (3) N3—C12—H12B 109.6

C2—C3—C1 120.4 (3) C13—C12—H12B 109.6

C4—C3—C1 119.7 (3) H12A—C12—H12B 108.2

O1—C4—C3 122.0 (3) N4—C13—C12 108.8 (3)

O1—C4—C9 122.0 (3) N4—C13—H13A 109.9

C3—C4—C9 116.0 (3) C12—C13—H13A 109.9

C8—C9—C5 116.7 (3) N4—C13—H13B 109.9

C8—C9—C4 121.6 (3) C12—C13—H13B 109.9

C5—C9—C4 121.7 (3) H13A—C13—H13B 108.3

N2—C8—C9 124.5 (3) N4—C14—C15 109.5 (3)

N2—C8—N1 116.2 (3) N4—C14—H14A 109.8

C9—C8—N1 119.3 (3) C15—C14—H14A 109.8

C6—C5—C9 118.3 (3) N4—C14—H14B 109.8

C6—C5—H6 120.9 C15—C14—H14B 109.8

C9—C5—H6 120.9 H14A—C14—H14B 108.2

C5—C6—F1 117.3 (3) N3—C15—C14 110.3 (3)

(8)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1051–o1053

F1—C6—C7 120.4 (3) C14—C15—H15A 109.6

N2—C7—N3 116.2 (3) N3—C15—H15B 109.6

N2—C7—C6 118.8 (3) C14—C15—H15B 109.6

N3—C7—C6 125.0 (3) H15A—C15—H15B 108.1

O3—C1—O2 120.3 (4)

C8—N1—C2—C3 −1.0 (5) C9—C5—C6—C7 −0.2 (6)

C10—N1—C2—C3 −178.2 (3) C8—N2—C7—N3 178.1 (3)

N1—C2—C3—C4 1.2 (5) C8—N2—C7—C6 1.0 (5)

N1—C2—C3—C1 −178.8 (3) C12—N3—C7—N2 8.2 (5)

C2—C3—C4—O1 −179.9 (3) C15—N3—C7—N2 161.6 (4)

C1—C3—C4—O1 0.1 (5) C12—N3—C7—C6 −174.9 (3)

C2—C3—C4—C9 −0.1 (5) C15—N3—C7—C6 −21.5 (6)

C1—C3—C4—C9 179.9 (3) C5—C6—C7—N2 −0.4 (5)

O1—C4—C9—C8 178.6 (3) F1—C6—C7—N2 178.0 (3)

C3—C4—C9—C8 −1.3 (5) C5—C6—C7—N3 −177.2 (4)

O1—C4—C9—C5 1.0 (5) F1—C6—C7—N3 1.2 (6)

C3—C4—C9—C5 −178.9 (3) C2—C3—C1—O3 −0.3 (6)

C7—N2—C8—C9 −1.1 (5) C4—C3—C1—O3 179.8 (4)

C7—N2—C8—N1 −179.9 (3) C2—C3—C1—O2 179.7 (3)

C5—C9—C8—N2 0.5 (5) C4—C3—C1—O2 −0.3 (5)

C4—C9—C8—N2 −177.2 (3) C2—N1—C10—C11 98.1 (4)

C5—C9—C8—N1 179.3 (3) C8—N1—C10—C11 −79.1 (4)

C4—C9—C8—N1 1.5 (5) C7—N3—C12—C13 95.2 (4)

C2—N1—C8—N2 178.4 (3) C15—N3—C12—C13 −61.9 (4)

C10—N1—C8—N2 −4.3 (5) C14—N4—C13—C12 −55.4 (5)

C2—N1—C8—C9 −0.4 (5) N3—C12—C13—N4 58.0 (4)

C10—N1—C8—C9 176.9 (3) C13—N4—C14—C15 54.5 (5)

C8—C9—C5—C6 0.1 (5) C7—N3—C15—C14 −94.9 (5)

C4—C9—C5—C6 177.8 (3) C12—N3—C15—C14 60.6 (4)

C9—C5—C6—F1 −178.6 (3) N4—C14—C15—N3 −55.8 (5)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

O2—H2···O1 0.84 1.65 2.442 (4) 156

N4—H4B···I1i 0.84 (5) 2.61 (5) 3.421 (4) 163 (4)

N4—H4A···O2ii 0.91 (6) 2.02 (6) 2.880 (5) 156 (5)

N4—H4A···O3ii 0.91 (6) 2.39 (6) 3.182 (5) 145 (5)

References

Related documents

While different equations have been tested and calibrated for different regions and sub-regions under different climatic conditions including in Canada [25] , in Iran [26] [27]

Piarco showed a notably lower response to water content compared to the other soils, whilst Chagaramus which had low BDs showed PR val- ues similar to and even greater than some

20 Actually, considering the large negative impact of the Great Recession in Italy, such estimates demonstrate that the Cohesion Policy allowed Convergence regions to limit the

Given that the poor have much lower levels of education than those better off, our research finding suggests that increasing the access of the poor to education, combined

Using a single unified internal representation for translation forests, the decoder strictly separates model-specific translation logic from general rescoring, pruning, and

This paper proposes the application of finite-state approximation techniques on a unification-based grammar of word for- mation for a language like German.. A refinement of an

T h e work described in this paper describes yet another unexplored dimension for concept languages - that of a restricted concept language with variables, feature

meaning of the sentence and are supposed to apply regularly on syntactic structures, and 'lexical' rules that alter argument structure, may change the meaning