• No results found

(2 Pyridyl­methyl)­ammonium nitrate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "(2 Pyridyl­methyl)­ammonium nitrate"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2004). E60, o911±o912 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536804010013 Duncan M. Tookeet al. C6H9N2+NO3ÿ

o911

organic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

(2-Pyridylmethyl)ammonium nitrate

Duncan M. Tooke,a*

Anthony L. Spek,aJan Reedijkb

and Ramu Kannappanb

aBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research,

Department of Crystal and Structural Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands, andbLeiden Institute

of Chemistry, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333 AC, The Netherlands

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 150 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.002 AÊ

Rfactor = 0.043

wRfactor = 0.097

Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.0

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2004 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

The single-crystal structure of (2-pyridylmethyl)ammonium nitrate, C6H9N2+NO3ÿ, is presented, in what is only the third reported structure containing this cation. The structure contains extensively hydrogen-bonded layers.

Comment

During research into novel chelating ligands, the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), was determined (Fig. 1). The structure of the (2-pyridylmethyl)ammonium cation has only been determined twice previously, once in a silver nitrate complex (Sailaja et al., 2001) and once as the pyridine-2-carboxylate salt (Dùssinget al., 2001). In both of these struc-tures, four hydrogen bonds were formed from the ammonium group.

In (I), ®ve hydrogen bonds are formed between the ammonium group and nitrate O atoms. These bonds, withDÐ H A distances of between 2.8237 (19) and 3.110 (2) AÊ, are comparable with the bonds reported in the AgNO3complex, and cause the formation of a two-dimensional network with thebandcaxes as the base vectors (Fig. 2).

Experimental

2-(Aminomethyl)pyridine (2.16 g, 0.02 mol) was dissolved in ethanol (5 ml) and added to a stirred ethanol solution ofo-vanillin (3.04 g, 0.02 mol). The reaction mixture was stirred overnight. The solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator to give a red residue, which was recrystallized from the minimum amount of hot methanol, yielding good quality single crystals.

Received 21 April 2004 Accepted 26 April 2004 Online 30 April 2004

Figure 1

(2)

Crystal data

C6H9N2+NO3ÿ Mr= 171.16

Monoclinic, P21=c a= 8.2492 (4) AÊ

b= 10.4014 (5) AÊ

c= 9.3850 (5) AÊ

= 105.171 (4) V= 777.20 (7) AÊ3 Z= 4

Dx= 1.463 Mg mÿ3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 59

re¯ections, based on ±scan (Duisenberget al., 2000)

= 5.5±20.8

= 0.12 mmÿ1 T= 150 (2) K Block, colourless 0.20.10.1 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

'and!scans

Absorption correction: none 18 148 measured re¯ections 1774 independent re¯ections 1228 re¯ections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.057

max= 27.4 h=ÿ10!10

k=ÿ13!13

l=ÿ12!12

Re®nement

Re®nement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.043 wR(F2) = 0.097 S= 1.05 1774 re¯ections 118 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained re®nement

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0364P)2

+ 0.3509P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.19 e AÊÿ3

min=ÿ0.23 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Hydrogen-bonding geometry (AÊ,).

DÐH A DÐH H A D A DÐH A

N2ÐH2A O2i 0.958 (19) 2.155 (18) 2.8817 (19) 131.7 (15)

N2ÐH2A N1i 0.958 (19) 2.345 (18) 3.037 (2) 128.7 (13)

N2ÐH2B O1ii 0.925 (18) 1.931 (18) 2.8237 (19) 161.4 (16)

N2ÐH2B O3ii 0.925 (18) 2.440 (19) 3.110 (2) 129.3 (15)

N2ÐH2C O1 0.942 (18) 1.923 (18) 2.8412 (18) 164.3 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) 1ÿx;1ÿy;ÿz; (ii)x;1 2ÿy;zÿ12.

The aromatic H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions (CÐH = 0.95 AÊ) and constrained to ride on their parent atoms withUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The H atoms on the N atom were found in a difference electron-density map and re®ned withUiso= 1.5Ueq(N).

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell re®nement:

DIRAX(Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction:EvalCCD(Duisenberg

et al., 2003); program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS86

(Shel-drick, 1985); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:PLATON(Spek, 2003); soft-ware used to prepare material for publication:PLATON.

This work was supported in part (ALS) by the Council for the Chemical Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scienti®c Research (CW±NWO).

References

Dùssing, A., Skands, M. C. & Madsen, A. é. (2001).Acta Cryst.C57, 1460± 1461.

Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1992).J. Appl. Cryst.25, 92±96.

Duisenberg, A. J. M., Hooft, R. W. W., Schreurs, A. M. M. & Kroon, J. (2000).

J. Appl. Cryst.33, 893±898.

Duisenberg, A. J. M., Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. & Schreurs, A. M. M. (2003).

J. Appl. Cryst.36, 220±229.

Nonius (1998).COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.

Sailaja, S., Swarnabala, G. & Rajasekharan, M. V. (2001).Acta Cryst.C57, 1162±1165.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1985).SHELXS86. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997).SHELXL97. University of GoÈttingen, Germany. Spek, A. L. (2003).J. Appl. Cryst.36, 7±13.

Figure 2

(3)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o911–o912

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o911–o912 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536804010013]

(2-Pyridylmethyl)ammonium nitrate

Duncan M. Tooke, Anthony L. Spek, Jan Reedijk and Ramu Kannappan

(I)

Crystal data

C6H9N2+·NO3− Mr = 171.16 Monoclinic, P21/c Hall symbol: -P 2ybc a = 8.2492 (4) Å b = 10.4014 (5) Å c = 9.3850 (5) Å β = 105.171 (4)° V = 777.20 (7) Å3 Z = 4

F(000) = 360 Dx = 1.463 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 59 reflections θ = 5.5–20.8°

µ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 150 K Block, colourless 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

18148 measured reflections 1774 independent reflections

1228 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.057

θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 2.6° h = −10→10

k = −13→13 l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 wR(F2) = 0.097 S = 1.05 1774 reflections 118 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: mixed

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0364P)2 + 0.3509P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001 Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Special details

(4)

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

N1 0.30006 (17) 0.43664 (13) 0.09967 (14) 0.0227 (3)

N2 0.52094 (18) 0.32680 (14) −0.02714 (16) 0.0212 (3)

H2A 0.502 (2) 0.4097 (19) −0.073 (2) 0.032*

H2B 0.590 (2) 0.2819 (18) −0.073 (2) 0.032*

H2C 0.578 (2) 0.3381 (17) 0.073 (2) 0.032*

C1 0.2010 (2) 0.49371 (18) 0.17383 (18) 0.0270 (4)

H1 0.2345 0.5751 0.2176 0.032*

C2 0.0542 (2) 0.44125 (18) 0.19013 (19) 0.0295 (4)

H2 −0.0119 0.4854 0.2435 0.035*

C3 0.0050 (2) 0.32320 (19) 0.12727 (19) 0.0314 (4)

H3 −0.0961 0.2844 0.1363 0.038*

C4 0.1047 (2) 0.26232 (18) 0.05104 (18) 0.0272 (4)

H4 0.0739 0.1807 0.0069 0.033*

C5 0.2507 (2) 0.32224 (16) 0.03990 (17) 0.0210 (4)

C6 0.3627 (2) 0.25603 (16) −0.04054 (18) 0.0248 (4)

H6A 0.3888 0.1683 0.0000 0.030*

H6B 0.3025 0.2479 −0.1462 0.030*

O1 0.66629 (15) 0.31660 (11) 0.28255 (12) 0.0263 (3)

O2 0.68263 (16) 0.52342 (12) 0.26607 (14) 0.0349 (3)

O3 0.7063 (2) 0.43410 (13) 0.47739 (14) 0.0455 (4)

N3 0.68525 (17) 0.42684 (14) 0.34289 (15) 0.0249 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

N1 0.0275 (8) 0.0202 (7) 0.0217 (7) 0.0009 (6) 0.0089 (6) 0.0011 (6)

N2 0.0266 (8) 0.0185 (8) 0.0211 (8) 0.0002 (6) 0.0105 (6) −0.0023 (6)

C1 0.0340 (10) 0.0246 (9) 0.0245 (9) 0.0058 (8) 0.0116 (7) 0.0019 (7)

C2 0.0279 (10) 0.0372 (11) 0.0264 (9) 0.0110 (8) 0.0124 (8) 0.0062 (8)

C3 0.0206 (9) 0.0426 (11) 0.0311 (10) −0.0001 (8) 0.0072 (7) 0.0095 (9)

C4 0.0253 (9) 0.0281 (10) 0.0260 (9) −0.0034 (8) 0.0028 (7) 0.0020 (8)

C5 0.0238 (8) 0.0205 (8) 0.0178 (8) 0.0020 (7) 0.0036 (6) 0.0038 (7)

C6 0.0291 (9) 0.0205 (9) 0.0264 (9) −0.0036 (7) 0.0103 (7) −0.0029 (7)

O1 0.0348 (7) 0.0205 (6) 0.0253 (6) −0.0015 (5) 0.0110 (5) −0.0025 (5)

O2 0.0394 (8) 0.0256 (7) 0.0358 (7) −0.0061 (6) 0.0031 (6) 0.0124 (6)

O3 0.0800 (11) 0.0351 (8) 0.0205 (7) −0.0064 (7) 0.0118 (7) −0.0032 (6)

(5)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o911–o912 Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C5 1.333 (2) C3—C4 1.378 (2)

N1—C1 1.342 (2) C3—H3 0.9500

N2—C6 1.475 (2) C4—C5 1.384 (2)

N2—H2A 0.96 (2) C4—H4 0.9500

N2—H2B 0.93 (2) C5—C6 1.505 (2)

N2—H2C 0.94 (2) C6—H6A 0.9900

C1—C2 1.373 (2) C6—H6B 0.9900

C1—H1 0.9500 O1—N3 1.2703 (18)

C2—C3 1.377 (3) O2—N3 1.2334 (17)

C2—H2 0.9500 O3—N3 1.2307 (18)

C5—N1—C1 116.90 (15) C3—C4—C5 118.82 (17)

C6—N2—H2A 111.9 (11) C3—C4—H4 120.6

C6—N2—H2B 110.3 (11) C5—C4—H4 120.6

H2A—N2—H2B 107.1 (15) N1—C5—C4 123.12 (15)

C6—N2—H2C 110.6 (11) N1—C5—C6 117.35 (14)

H2A—N2—H2C 108.5 (16) C4—C5—C6 119.52 (15)

H2B—N2—H2C 108.4 (16) N2—C6—C5 112.02 (14)

N1—C1—C2 123.81 (17) N2—C6—H6A 109.2

N1—C1—H1 118.1 C5—C6—H6A 109.2

C2—C1—H1 118.1 N2—C6—H6B 109.2

C1—C2—C3 118.46 (16) C5—C6—H6B 109.2

C1—C2—H2 120.8 H6A—C6—H6B 107.9

C3—C2—H2 120.8 O3—N3—O2 121.72 (15)

C2—C3—C4 118.90 (17) O3—N3—O1 118.72 (14)

C2—C3—H3 120.6 O2—N3—O1 119.56 (13)

C4—C3—H3 120.6

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

N2—H2A···O2i 0.958 (19) 2.155 (18) 2.8817 (19) 131.7 (15)

N2—H2A···N1i 0.958 (19) 2.345 (18) 3.037 (2) 128.7 (13)

N2—H2B···O1ii 0.925 (18) 1.931 (18) 2.8237 (19) 161.4 (16)

N2—H2B···O3ii 0.925 (18) 2.440 (19) 3.110 (2) 129.3 (15)

N2—H2C···O1 0.942 (18) 1.923 (18) 2.8412 (18) 164.3 (16)

References

Related documents

In this study, we identified 9 protein markers for predicting time to recurrence using the protein expression data on 222 TCGA pri- marily high-grade serous ovarian cancers

For the purpose of analyzing the impurities in the water samples coming from different roofs, four building within the KCAET campus viz location 1(library -

To overcome the problems and weakness, this project need to do some research and studying to develop better technology. There are list of the objectives to be conduct

The above block diagram shows the SPV fed to Dc/Dc Converter for different dc applications, To analysis the performance of dc-dc converters(Buck, Boost,

22 subjects showing low or undetectable activities of BAT were randomly divided into 2 groups: one was exposed to cold at 17°C for 2 hours every day for 6 weeks (cold group; n

Foxo deletion on osteoblast differentiation in both bone marrow and calvaria cells suggests that the increases in ALP activity and mineralization observed in the bone

Histologically, the lesion is composed of fibrous connective tissue trabeculae (top quarter of image) and adipose connective tissue (bottom three quarters of image); within

• Data shows credit using and rationing of risk averts, risk neutrals and risk lovers respectively. As to risk averts, the credit is mainly used to pay children’s tuition, medical