• No results found

Operations on Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Operations on Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Technology (IJRASET)

Operations on Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph

Dr. A Thamilisai 1, R Rajeswari 2 1

Assistant Professor, Kamaraj College of Engineering, Virudhunagar 2Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Fatima College, Madurai.

Abstract : The concept of hypergraphs was extended to fuzzy hypergraph. In this paper, we extend the concepts of fuzzy hypergraphs into that of hesitant fuzzy hypergraphs. Based on the definition of hesitant fuzzy graph, order of the hfhg, size of the hfhg, operations like complement, join, union, intersection, ringsum, cartesian product, composition are defined for hesitant fuzzy graphs. The authors further proposed to apply these operations in clustering techniques.

I. INTRODUCTION

Hypergraph theory, originally developed by C.Berge in 1960, is a generalization of graph theory. The concept of hypergraphs can model more general types of relations than binary relations. The notion of hypergraphs has been extended in fuzzy theory and the concept of fuzzy hypergraphs was proposed by Lee-Kwang and S.M.Chen. The authors have already introduced the concept of Hesitant fuzzy hypergraph. Operations on HFHGs have also been analyzed to a real-life problem with a numerical example.

II. PRELIMINARIES

A. Definition 1.1

Let X be a fixed set, a Hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) on X is in terms of a function that when applied to X returns a subset of [0, 1]. The

HFS is defined by a mathematical symbol:

A = {< x, hA(x) > / x X}

where hA(x) is a set of some values in [0, 1], denoting the possible membership degrees of the element xX to the set A. Xu and Xia

(2011b) called h = hA(x) a hesitant fuzzy element (HFE) and Ɵ the set of all HFEs.

B. Definition 1.2

A Hesitancy Fuzzy Graph is of the form G = (V, E), where

V = {v1, v2,…vn} such that μ1:V→[0,1],γ1: V→[0,1] and β1: V→[0,1] denote the degree of membership, non-membership

and hesitancy of the element vi∈V respectively and μ1(vi)+γ1(vi)+β1(vi) = 1for every vi∈V, where β1(vi) = 1-[μ1 (vi) + γ1 (vi)] and

E ⊆ V×V where μ2: V×V → [0,1], γ2: V×V → [0,1] and β2: V×V →[0,1] are such that,

μ2 (vi, vj) ≤ min [μ1 (vi), μ1 (vj)]

γ2 (vi, vj) ≤ max [γ1 (vi), γ1 (vj)]

β2 (vi, vj) ≤ min [β1 (vi), β1 (vj)]

and 0 ≤ μ2(vi,vj) + γ2(vi,vj) + β2(vi,vj) ≤ 1 for every (vi,vj) ∈ E.

C. Definition 1.3

1) Hypergraph H is an ordered pair H = (V, E) where

a) V = {v1, v2, v3 …vn}, a finite set of vertices.

b) E = {E1, E2, E3 …Em}, a family of subsets of V .

c) Ej≠ ∅, j = 1,2, … m and UEj = V.

The set V is called the set of vertices and E is the set of edges (or hyper edges).

D. Definition 1.4

In a hypergraph, two or more vertices x1, x2 ,…, xn are said to be adjacent if there exist an edge Ej which contains those vertices. In

a hypergraph two edges Ei & Ej, i≠j is said to be adjacent if their intersection is not empty.

(3)

Technology (IJRASET)

F. Definition 1.6

1) Hesitant Fuzzy HyperGraph (HFHG) is an ordered pair H = <V, E> where

a) V = {v1, v2, v3 …vn}, a finite set of vertices

b) E = {E1, E2, E3 …Em}, a family of Hesitant fuzzy subsets of V.

c) Ej = {<vi, j(vi), γj(vi),βj(vi)> / μj(vi), γj(vi), βj(vi) ≥0 and 0 ≤ μ2(vi,vj) + γ2(vi,vj) + β2(vi,vj) ≤ 1, j = 1,2,… m}

d) Ej≠ ∅, j = 1,2, … m

Here the edges Ejare HFHGs. μj(vi), γj(vi), βj(vi) denote the degree of membership, non-membership and hesitancy of the element

vi∈ V respectively of the vertex vito edge Ej.

G. Definition 1.7

Let H = (X, E) be a Regular Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph. The order of a Regular Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph, H in

O (H) =

 

x X x X

E E

X x

Ei

(

x

)

,

i

(

x

),

i

(

x

)

for every xX.

The size of Regular Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph is

S (H) =

n i i

E

S

1

)

(

where

S

(

E

i

)

=

 

i i

i i

i i

E

x x E

E E

E x

E

(

x

)

,

(

x

),

(

x

)

1) Example 1: Consider the Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraph H = (X, E), Define X = {a, b, c, d} and

E = {E1, E2, E3, E4}, where

E1 = {(a, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2) (b, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2)}

E2 = {(b, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2) (c, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2)}

E3 = {(c, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2) (d, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2)}

E4 = {(d, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2) (a, 0.1, 0.7, 0.2)}

Here, Order of the HFHG, O (H) = (0.4, 2.8, 0.8), Size of the HFHG, S (H) = (0.8, 5.6, 1.6).

III. OPERATIONS ON HESITANT FUZZY HYPERGRAPHS

A. Definition 2.1

Let G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) be two HFHGs. Then the Union of G1 and G2is an HFHG G = G1∪G2 = (V1∪V2, E1∪E2) defined

by

1 2 ' 2 1 1 ' 1 1

)

(

)

(

)

)(

(

1

v

if

v

V

V

V

V

v

if

v

v

1 2 ' 2 1 1 ' 1 1

)

(

)

(

)

)(

(

1

v

if

v

V

V

V

V

v

if

v

v

1 2 ' 2 1 1 ' 1 1

)

(

)

(

)

)(

(

1

v

if

v

V

V

V

V

v

if

v

v

And

1 2 ' 2 2 1 2 ' 2

2

)(

)

(4)

Technology (IJRASET)

1 2 '

2

2 1 2

' 2

2

)(

)

(

E

E

e

if

E

E

e

if

v

v

ij ij

ij ij

j i

1 2 '

2

2 1 2

' 2

2

)(

)

(

E

E

e

if

E

E

e

if

v

v

ij ij

ij ij

j i

where (μ1,γ1, β1) and (μ1',γ1', β1') refer the vertex membership, non-membership and hesitant element of G1and G2respectively;

(μ2,γ2, β2) and (μ2',γ2', β2') refer the edge membership, non-membership and hesitant element of G1and G2respectively.

1) Example 2: Consider the Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraphs G1 = (V1, E1) where V1 = {a, b, c, d} and G2 = (V2, E2) where V2 = {u1,

u2}.

G1 G2

G1G2

B. Definition 2.2

Let G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) be two HFHGs. Then the Join of G1 and G2 is an HFHG G = G1+G2 = (V1 ∪V2, E1∪E2 ′)

defined by

)

)(

(

1

1'

v

=

(

1

1'

)(

v

)

if v ϵ V1 ∪ V2

)

)(

(

1

1'

v

=

(

1

1'

)(

v

)

if v ϵ V1 ∪ V2

)

)(

(5)

Technology (IJRASET)

' ' 1 1 2 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 1

)

(

)

(

)

)(

(

)

)(

(

E

v

v

if

v

v

E

E

v

v

if

v

v

v

v

j i j i j i j i j i

' ' 1 1 2 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 1

)

(

)

(

)

)(

(

)

)(

(

E

v

v

if

v

v

E

E

v

v

if

v

v

v

v

j i j i j i j i j i

' ' 1 1 2 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 1

)

(

)

(

)

)(

(

)

)(

(

E

v

v

if

v

v

E

E

v

v

if

v

v

v

v

j i j i j i j i j i

1) Example 3: Consider the Hesitant Fuzzy Hypergraphs G1 = (V1, E1) where V1 = {a, b, c, d} and G2 = (V2, E2) where V2 = {u1,

u2}.

G1 G2

G1+G2

C. Definition 2.3

Let G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) be two HFHGs. Then the Intersection of HFHGs G1 and G2, denoted by G1 I G2, is an HFHG

defined by

)

)(

(

1

I

1'

v

=

1 2 1 ' 2 1 1

)

(

)

(

V

and

V

v

if

v

V

and

V

v

if

v

)

)(

(

1

I

1'

v

=

1 2 1 ' 2 1 1

)

(

)

(

V

and

V

v

if

v

V

and

V

v

if

v

)

)(

(

1

I

1'

v

=

1 2 1 ' 2 1 1

)

(

)

(

V

and

V

v

if

v

V

and

V

v

if

v

)

)(

(

2

I

2'

v

i

v

j =

(6)

Technology (IJRASET)

)

)(

(

2

I

2'

v

i

v

j =

1 2

2 '

2 1

2

E

and

E

e

if

E

and

E

e

if

ij ij

ij ij

)

)(

(

2

I

2'

v

i

v

j =

1 2

2 '

2 1

2

E

and

E

e

if

E

and

E

e

if

ij ij

ij ij

1) Example 4:

G1 G2

G1 I G2

D. Definition 2.4

Let G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) be two HFHGs. Then the ringsum of HFHGs G1and G2is an HFHG defined by

(7)

Technology (IJRASET)

G1

G2

E. Definition 2.5

Let G1 = (V1, E1) and G2 = (V2, E2) be two HFHGs. Then the Cartesian product of HFHGs G1and G2is an HFHG, denoted by G =

G1xG2, defined by G = (V, E'') V =V1xV2 and

E” = {(u, u2 )(u, v2 ) : uϵV1 ,u2v2 ϵ E2} U{(u1,w)(v1,w) : wϵV2 ,u1v1ϵ E1}

where (i)

(μ1 x μ1')(u1, u2) = μ1(u1).μ1'(u2) for every (u1,u2) ϵ V

(γ1 x γ1')(u1, u2) = γ1(u1).γ1'(u2) for every (u1,u2) ϵ V and

(β1 x β1')(u1, u2) = β1(u1).β1'(u2) for every (u1,u2) ϵ V

(ii)

(μ2 x μ2')(u,u2)(u,v2) = μ1(u).μ2(u2v2 ) for every u ϵ V1 , u2v2ϵ E2

(γ2 x γ2')(u,u2)(u,v2) = γ1(u).γ2(u2v2 ) for every u ϵ V1 , u2v2ϵ E2

(β2 x β2')(u,u2)(u,v2) = β1(u).β2(u2v2 ) for every u ϵ V1 , u2v2ϵ E2 and

(μ2 x μ2')(u1, w)(v1, w) = μ1(w).μ2(u1v1) for every w ϵ V2 , u1v1ϵ E1

(γ2 x γ2')(u1, w)(v1, w) = γ1(w).γ2(u1v1) for every w ϵ V2 , u1v1ϵ E1

(β2 x β2')(u1, w)(v1, w) = β1(w).β2(u1v1) for every w ϵ V2 , u1v1ϵ E1

1) Example 5:

F. Definition 2.6

Let G = G1ᴏ G2 = (V1xV2, E) be the Composition of two graphs G1 and G2 where V = V1 x V2 and

E= {(u, u2 )(u, v2) : uϵV1 ,u2v2 ϵ E2} U{(u1, w)(v1, w) : w ϵV2 ,u1v1ϵE1}

U{(u1, u2)(v1, v2) : u1v1ϵE1 , u2 ≠ v2}

Then, the “Composition of HFHGs G1 and G2”, denoted by G = G1ᴏG2, is an HFHG defined by

(i)

(μ1ᴏμ1')(u1, u2) = μ1(u1).μ1'(u2) for every (u1,u2) ϵ V1xV2

(8)

Technology (IJRASET)

(β1ᴏβ1')(u1, u2) = β1(u1).β1'(u2) for every (u1,u2) ϵ V1xV2

(ii)

(μ2 ᴏμ2')(u,u2)(u,v2) = μ1(u).μ2(u2v2 ) for every uϵV1 , u2v2ϵ E2

(γ2 ᴏγ2')(u,u2)(u,v2) = γ1(u).γ2(u2v2 ) for every uϵV1 , u2v2 ϵ E2

(β2 ᴏβ2')(u,u2)(u,v2) = β1(u).β2(u2v2 ) for every uϵV1 , u2v2 ϵ E2

(μ2 ᴏμ2')(u1, w)(v1, w) = μ1(w).μ2(u1v1) for every wϵV2 , u1v1ϵ E1

(γ2 ᴏγ2')(u1, w)(v1, w) = γ1(w).γ2(u1v1) for every wϵV2 , u1v1ϵ E1

(β2 ᴏβ2')(u1, w)(v1, w) = β1(w).β2(u1v1) for every wϵV2 , u1v1ϵ E1 and

(μ2 ᴏμ2')(u1, u2)(v1, v2) = μ1'(u2). μ1'(v2).μ2(u1v1) for every (u1,u2), (v1,v2) ϵ E - E''

(γ2 ᴏγ2') (u1, u2)(v1, v2) = γ 1'(u2). γ 1'(v2). γ 2(u1v1) for every (u1,u2), (v1,v2) ϵ E - E''

(β2 ᴏβ2') (u1, u2)(v1, v2) = β 1'(u2).β 1'(v2).β 2(u1v1) for every (u1,u2), (v1,v2) ϵ E - E''

where

E'' = {(u, u2 )(u, v2 ) : u ϵ V1 ,u2v2 ϵ E2} U{(u1, w)(v1, w) : w ϵV2 ,u1 v1ϵ E1}

1) Example 6:

IV. CONCLUSION

In this paper, order of the HFHG, size of the HFHG, Operations like complement, join, union, intersection, ringsum, Cartesian product, composition on HFHGs are defined. Currently, the authors are working on existing clustering techniques. Further, it is proposed to apply the properties of HFHGs to develop a new clustering algorithm and the same may be checked with a numerical dataset.

REFERENCES

[1] Z. Xu, Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Theory, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 314, 1 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04711-9_1, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014.

[2] M o r d e s o n N. J o h n, N a i r S. P r e m c h a n d. Fuzzy Graphs and Fuzzy Hypergraphs,New York, Physica-Verlag, 2000, ISBN 3-7908-1286-2. [3] T. Pathinathan, J. Jon Arockiaraj and J. Jesintha Rosline , Hesitancy Fuzzy Graphs, Vol 8(35), DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i35/86672, December 2015, Indian

Journal of Science and Technology, ISSN (Print) : 0974-6846.

[4] R.Parvathi, M.G.Karunambigai and K.T.Atanassov, Operations on Intuitionistic fuzzy graphs, Fuzzy Systems, 2009, Fuzz-IEEE 2009. IEEE international conference 1396-1401.

[5] S.Thilagavathi, R.Parvathi and M.G.Karunambigai, Intuitionistic fuzzy hypergraphs, J.Cybernetics and Information Technologies 9(2), (2009), 46-53, Sofia. [6] I.Pradeepa and S.Vimala , Regular and Totally Regular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hypergraph(IFH), Volume 4, Issue 1-C (2016), 137-142, Indian Journal of

(9)

References

Related documents

Hence this work aims to comprehensively review the quantitative (observational and intervention) and quali- tative literature on determinants/correlates of fruit and vegetable

It also suggests that Golgi-to- vacuole trafficking through either the AP-3 or the endosomal route is sufficient to support subapical vacuole expansion dur- ing polarized hyphal

Psychosocial measures that were associated with pain perception were Novelty Seeking, Harm Avoidance, and Persistence subscales and Thrill and Adventure Seeking subscale of

tree, and as conference size grows larger, the advantage be- comes more notable; 2) distributed DV protocol cannot make use of bandwidth resource as intelligently as a

Since the s allele is associated not only with neuroticism and tendency to develop affective disorders in the face of adverse life events, but also with less favourable response

Elliptical copulas and the Archimedean copulas: Frank, Clayton and Gumbel are then fitted to the pseudo bivariate series generated from hyperbolic distribution. On

This comes in useful for German-speaking students wanting to increase their intercultural experience via the German-speaking study programmes or, as students of the

Due to the significant impact of psychological factors (kinesiophobia) on the rehabilitation outcomes and success of return to sport after ACL injury, psychological