• No results found

Plaintiffs, Civil Action No.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Plaintiffs, Civil Action No."

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

and

THESTATE OF

TEXAS,

Plaintiffs,

SA-15-CV-676

Civil Action No. V.

KOCH PIPELINE

COMPANY, L.P.,

Defendant.

COMPLAINT

The United States of America

(United States), by

the

authority

of the

Attorney

General,

and

through

the

undersigned

attorneys,

acting

onbehalfofthe

Secretary

of the United States

Department

of the

Interior,

and the StateofTexas

(Texas), acting

onbehalfof the Texas

CommissiononEnvironmental

Quality,

the Texas Parks and Wildlife

Department,

and the Texas General Land

Office,

file this

Complaint

and

allege

asfollows:

I. NATUREOFTHE ACTION

1. This isacivil action

brought

pursuant

tothe Oil PollutionAct

(OPA),

33 U.S.C.

2701,

et for

damages

for

injury

to, destruction

of,

loss

of,

orloss ofuse

of,

certain natural

resources, and thecostsofassessment

thereof,

against

Koch

Pipeline Company,

L.P.,

in connection with the October

18, 1998,

release of 963 barrels of crude oil from Defendant's former crude oil

receiving

station

(Facility)

in Karnes

County,

Texas

(Incident).

(2)

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

2. This Court has

jurisdiction

overthe

subject

matterand the

parties

hereto,

pursuant

to

OPA Section

1017(b),

33 U.S.C.

2717(b);

and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1345.

3. This Court has

personal jurisdiction

overthe Defendant because the

Facility

is located within the

jurisdictional

boundaries for the United States District Court for the Western District of

Texas,

asestablished

by Congress

under 28 U.S.C.

124(d)(4).

4. Venue isproperin this

District,

pursuant

to Section

1017(b)

of

OPA,

33 U.S.C.

2717(b),

and 28 U.S.C.

1391,

and

1395,

because this is the

judicial

district in which the Incident and

resulting

naturalresource

damages

occurred.

III. AUTHORITY

5.The United States

Department

of Justice has the

authority

to

bring

this actiononbehalf of the

Department

of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

(DOI/FWS)

under 28 U.S.C. 516 and 519.

6. The United States

brings

this actiononbehalf of the

Department

of the Interior

(DOI),

afederalagencythat has been

delegated authority by

the Presidentto actonbehalf of the

public

with

respect

tonaturalresourcesand their

supporting

ecosystems

belonging

to,

appertaining

to,

managed by,

orcontrolled

by

the United States. Exec. OrderNo.

12580,

asamended

by

Exec. Order No.

12777;

Section 1006 of

OPA,

33 U.S.C.

2706;

and theNational Oil andHazardous

Substances Pollution

Contingency

Plan

(NCP),

40 C.F.R. Part 300.600.

7. The State of Texas

joins

this actiononbehalf of the Texas Commissionon

Environmental

Quality (TCEQ),

theTexas Parks and Wildlife

Department (TPWD),

and the Texas General Land Office

(GLO),

state

agencies

thathave been

designated by

the Governorof

(3)

ecosystems,

within the

boundary

of the stateor

belonging

to,

managed by,

controlled

by,

or

appertaining

tosuchstate. 33 U.S.C.

2706(b)(3),

and the

NCP,

40 C.F.R. 300.605.

8. The United

States,

through

the DOI's Fish andWildlife Service

(FWS),

andtheState of

Texas,

through

TCEQ,

TPWD and GLO areTrustees fora

variety

of naturalresources in and around the Defendant's former

Facility,

located in Karnes

County,

Texas. 33 U.S.C. 2706.

IV. DEFENDANT

9.Koch

Pipeline Company,

L.P. isaDelaware limited

partnership

licensedtodo business inTexas.

10. Atall times

relevant,

Defendant owned and

operated

acrude oil

receiving

station located in Karnes

County,

Texas.

11. Defendant is a

"person"

within the

meaning

of OPA Section

1001(27),

33 U.S.C.

2701(27).

V. STATEMENT OF FACTS RELATING TO NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES 12. Defendant

formerly

owned and

operated

a

50,

000-barrel tankas

part

ofacrude oil

receiving

station,

located

approximately

400 feet from Marcelinas Creek in Karnes

County,

Texas. Marcelinas Creek isa

perennial

stream, which flows into the San Antonio

River,

which in turnfeedsinto the

Guadalupe

River,

a

major

water sourcefor the San Antonio

Bay Estuary,

and the Gulf of Mexico

beyond.

13. OnOctober

18, 1998,

963 barrels of crude oil

discharged

from the

Facility,

about 783 of which

escaped

the

Facility's

containment

system

and entered Marcelinas Creek where

floodwaters carried the crude oil several miles downstream toacollection

point just

below the creek's intersection with

County

Road 237. Thefloodwaters

transported

the oil

beyond

the banks of the

creek,

coating vegetation

and the

riparian

areadownstream with oilasthe watersreceded.

(4)

14. This unauthorized

discharge

of oil resulted inan

injury

orharmto "naturalresources"

throughout

theareaof the

spill,

within the

meaning

of OPA Section

1001(20),

33 U.S.C.

2701(20),

including

resourcesunder the

trusteeships

of the

DOI,

TCEQ,

TPWD and GLO. The

discharge

has resultedinharm to,

injury

to,destruction

of,

loss

of,

orloss ofuse

of,

natural

resources

including,

butnotlimitedto, surfacewater,

migratory

bird

species,

freshwater wetland

habitat,

riparian vegetation, multiple

tree

species, understory,

coastal and nativegrasses, and the banks of the creek in the

vicinity

of the Incident.

VI. STATUTORY BACKGROUND

15. OPASection

1002(a),

33 U.S.C.

2702(a), provides

that "each

responsible

party

for

a

facility

from which oil is

discharged...

intooruponthe

navigable

waters... is liablefor

the

damages... specified

in subsection

(b)

that result from such incident."

16. PursuanttoOPASection

1001(32),

33 U.S.C.

2701(32), "responsible party"

means

(B)

Inthecase ofanonshore

facility....

any person

owning

or

operating

the

facility."

17. OPA Section

1001(14),

33 U.S.C.

2701(14),

defines"incident" as

"any

occurrence

involving

one ormore... facilities...

resulting

in the

discharge...

of oil."

18. PursuanttoOPASection

1001(7),

33 U.S.C.

2701(7), "discharge"

is definedas

"any

emission

(other

than natural

seepage),

intentionalor

unintentional,

and

includes,

but isnot

limited to,

spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emptying,

or

dumping."

19. OPA Section

1001(23),

33 U.S.C.

2701(23),

defines "oil"as "oil ofanykindorin

any

form,

including,

butnotlimitedto

petroleum,

fuel

oil,

sludge,

oil

refuse,

and oil mixed with

wastesother than

dredged spoil...

20. OPA Section

1001(21),

33 U.S.C.

2701(21),

defines

"navigable

waters"as "the

(5)

21. OPA Section

1001(9),

33 U.S.C.

2701(9),

defines

"facility"

as

"any

structure, group ofstructures,

equipment,

ordevice... used forone ormore of the

following

purposes:

exploring

for,

drilling

for,

producing,

storing,

handling, transferring, processing,

or

transporting

oil."

22. OPA Section

1002(b)(2)(A),

33 U.S.C.

2702(b)(2)(A), provides

thatthe

damages

referredtoin subsection

(a)

of Section

1002,

include:

"Damages

for

injury

to, destruction

of,

loss

of,

orloss ofuse

of,

naturalresources,

including

the reasonablecostsof

assessing

the

damage

Such

damages

are recoverable

by

federalandstate trustees.

23. Pursuantto Section

1001(20)

of

OPA,

33 U.S.C.

2701(20),

theterm "natural resources"

comprises

"land, fish, wildlife, biota, air,

water,

ground

water,

drinking

water

supplies,

and other suchresources

belonging

to,

managed by,

held intrust

by, appertaining

to,or otherwise controlled

by

the United States...

[or]

anyState...

VII. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

24. Thecrude oil

storage

tankreferredtoin

Paragraph

12

above,

is a

"facility"

within the

meaning

of OPA Section

1001(9),

33 U.S.C.

2701(9),

because itwas and is used for

"producing, storing, handling, transferring, processing

or

transporting

oil."

25. Atall times

relevant,

Defendantwasthe "owner and

operator"

of the

Facility,

within the

meaning

of OPA Section

1001(26),

33 U.S.C.

2701(26).

26. "Oil" within the

meaning

ofOPA Section

1001(23),

33 U.S.C.

2701(23),

was

discharged

from the

Facility

onOctober

18,

1998.

27. The

discharge

of "oil" from the

Facility

resulted ina

discharge

into orupon

Marcelinas Creek and/or its

adjoining

shorelines. Marcelinas Creek isa

navigable

waterwithin

the

meaning

ofSection 1002 of

OPA,

33 U.S.C. 2702.

(6)

29. Asa

"responsible

party,

Defendantis

strictly

liabletothe United

States,

andtothe State of

Texas,

"for

damages

for

injury

to, destruction

of,

loss

of,

orloss ofuse

of,

natural

resources,

including

the reasonablecosts of

assessing

the

damage, resulting

from the Incident. 33 U.S.C.

2702(b)(2)(A).

30. "Naturalresources, as defined in OPA Section

1001(20),

33 U.S.C.

2701(20),

held intrust

by

federal and statetrustees,have been

injured, destroyed,

orlostas aresult of the

Incident,

withinthe

meaning

of 33 U.S.C.

2702(b)(2).

Thenaturalresourcesand/orservices

impacted

because of the Incident

include,

butare notlimited to,the MarcelinasCreekwater

column,

creek

sediments,

and benthic

organisms living

in

sediments,

riparian

habitat,

improved

and

unimproved

pasture,

and terrestrial biota in and around Marcelinas Creek.

VIII. CLAIM FOR RELIEF

31. Plaintiffs

re-allege

and

incorporate by

reference

Paragraphs

1

through

30as if

fully

setforth herein.

32. Defendant's

discharge

of oil into orupon

navigable

watersor

adjoining

shorelines on October

18, 1998,

renders itliableunder Section

1002(a)

of

OPA,

33 U.S.C.

2702(a),

for all

damages

tonaturalresources,

including

butnotlimitedtothe reasonable costsincurred

by

the United States and the State in

assessing

the

damage.

IX. PRAYER FORRELIEF

WHEREFORE,

baseduponthe

allegations

in

Paragraphs

1

through

30 of this

Complaint,

Plaintiffs

respectfully

request

that this Court:

1. Enter

judgment

in favor of the United States and the State of

Texas,

and

against

Defendant Koch for

damages

for

injury

tonatural resources

resulting

from the

Incident,

including

thecostsof

assessing

such

damages;

and

(7)

2. Grantthe Plaintiffs such other and further reliefas the Court deems

just

andproper.

Respectfully

submitted,

FORTHE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA:

JohnC. Cruden

Assistant

Attorney

General

Environment and Natural Resources Division United States

Department

of Justice

Nathaniel

Douglas

Deputy

Section Chief

Environmental Enforcement Section

Environment and NaturalResources Division

Dated:Al

u.r(-1°-

11,,

20:

Kirk W. Koester

Trial

Attorney

Environmental Enforcement Section

Environment and NaturalResources Division United States

Department

of Justice

P.O. Box7611

Washington,

DC 20044-7611

kirk.koester@usdoj.gov

RichardL.

Durbin,

Jr.

United States

Attorney

WesternDistrict ofTexas

Dated:

4-61(

qhiitef,

ICivilDivision

Utf

edStates

Attorney

WesternDistrict ofTexas SanAntonio Division

601 NW

Loop 410,

Suite600 San

Antonio,

Texas 78216

(8)

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS:

KenPaxton

Attorney

General ofTexas

CharlesE.

Roy

First Assistant

Attorney

General

JamesE. Davis

Deputy Attorney

General for Civil

Litigation

Jon Niermann

Chief,

Environmental Protection Division

Attorney

General of Texas

Dated:

iii

41111^ 0',

e

4,

Ja. Atwood

stant

Attorney

General

Texas StateBarNo. 00796144

Office of the

Attorney

General of Texas P.O.Box 12548

Austin,

Texas 78711

512.463.2012

(9)

DATE SIgNATUREOF ATTORNEY

ForeignCountry

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS I DEFENDANTS

United States ofAmerica,and the State of Texas

I

KochPipeline Company, L.P.

(b) CountyofResidenceof FirstListed Plaintiff Countyof Residence of First Listed Defendant Kames

(EXCEPTIN U.S. PLAINTIFFCASES) (INU.S.PLAINTIFFCASESONLY)

NOTE: INLANDCONDEMNATIONCASES,USE THE LOCATION OF THETRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorneys(FirmName,Address,andTelephone Number) Attorneys (IfKnown)

United StatesDepartmentofJustice,P.O. Box7611,WashingtonDC BarclayNicholson, Norton RoseFulbrightUSLLP, 1301 McKinney,

20044;AttorneyGeneral ofTexas, P.O. Box12548,Austin,Texas 78711 Suite5100, Houston,Texas77010

II. BASIS OFJIJRISDICTION(Placean"X"inOne BoxOnly) III. CITIZENSHIPOF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Placean"X"inOne Boxfor Plaintiff

(For DiversityCasesOnly) and One Boxfor Defendant)

V

1 U.S. Government 0 3 FederalQuestion PTF DEF PTF DEF

Plaintiff (U.S.Government NotaParty) Citizenof This State 0 1 0 1 IncorporatedorPrincipalPlace 0 4 04 of Business In This State

O 2 U.S. Government 0 4 Diversity CitizenofAnother State 0 2 0 2 IncorporatedandPrincipalPlace 0 5 0 5

Defendant (Indicate CitizenshipofPartiesinItemIII) of Business In Another State

CitizenorSubjectofa 0 3 0 3 ForeignNation 0 6 0 6

IV. NATURE OF SUIT(Placean "X"inOne BoxOnly)

O 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 0 625DrugRelatedSeizure 0 422Appeal28 USC 158 0 375False ClaimsAct

O 120Marine 0310Airplane 0 365PersonalInjury ofProperty21 USC 881 0 423Withdrawal 0 400 StateReapportionment O 130MillerAct 0 315AirplaneProduct ProductLiability 0 690 Other 28 USC 157 0 410 Antitrust

O 140NegotiableInstrument Liability 0 367HealthCare/ 0 430Banks andBanking

O 150RecoveryofOverpayment 0320Assault,Libel & Pharmaceutical AM-7T4 a.,. ''..7.i.:-' 0 450 Commerce

&Enforcement ofJudgment Slander PersonalInjuty 0 820Copyrights 0 460Deportation

O 151 Medicare Act 0330FederalEmployers' ProductLiability 0 830 Patent 0 470 RacketeerInfluenced and

O 152Recoveryof Defaulted Liability 0 368AsbestosPersonal 0 840Trademark Comipt Organizations

Student Loans 0 340 Marine InjuryProduct 0 480 ConsumerCredit

(ExcludesVeterans) 0 345 Marine Product Liability lip,E,4,,,,, Nor,,,,F,,, NW:,,,,, p1,,,, 0 490 Cable/Sat TV O 153RecoveryofOverpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 710Fair LaborStandards 0 861 HIA(1395ff) 0 850Securities/Commodities/

of Veteran's Benefits 0 350 MotorVehicle 0 370 OtherFraud Act 0 862BlackLung(923) Exchange

O 160 Stockholders' Suits 0 355 Motor Vehicle 0 371 Truth inLending 0 720Labor/Management 0 863 DIWC/DIWW(405(g)) 0 890 OtherStatutoryActions O 190OtherContract ProductLiability 0 380 Other Personal Relations 0 864 SSIDTitleXVI 0 891AgriculturalActs O 195 Contract ProductLiability 0 360 OtherPersonal Property Damage 0 740RailwayLabor Act 0865 RSI(405(g)) X 893 Environmental Matters

O 196 Franchise Injury 0 385Property Damage 0 751FamilyandMedical 0 895 FreedomofInformation

0 362 PersonalInjury ProductLiability Leave Act Act

MedicalMal.. ice 0 790 Other LaborLitigation 0 896 Arbitration

12:::, :4 Pgir, 5, 17.T:: v-,0 791EmployeeRetirement ;34; Hr:',7i:X;',, 0 899 Administrative Procedure

0210LandCondemnation 0 440Other CivilRights HabeasCorpus: IncomeSecurityAct 0870 Taxes(U.S.Plaintiff, Act/RevieworAppealof

0 220 Foreclosure 0 441Voting 0 463 AlienDetainee orDefendant) AgencyDecision

0230 Rent Lease&Ejectrnent 0 442Employment 0 510 MotionstoVacate 0 871IRS—ThirdParty 0 950Constitutionalityof

0 240 TortstoLand 0 443Housing/ Sentence 26USC 7609 State Statutes

0 245 Tort ProductLiability Accommodations 0 530General

0 290 AllOtherRealProperty 0 445 Amer.w/Disabilities 0 535DeathPenalty

Employment Other: 0 462NaturalizationApplication

0446 Amer.w/Disabilities 0 540Mandamus& Other 0 465 OtherImmigration

Other 0 550 CivilRights Actions

0448Education 0 555PrisonCondition 0 560Civil Detainee

Conditionsof Confinement

V. ORIGIN(Placean"X"inOne BoxOnly)

X1 Original 0 2 Removed from 0 3 Remandedfrom 0 4 Reinstatedor 0 5 Transferred from 0 6 Multidistrict

Proceeding State Court AppellateCourt Reopened Another District Litigation

(specify)

Citethe U.S. Civil Statute under which youaretiling (Donotcitejurisdictionalstatutesunlessdiversity):

Oil PollutionAct, 33U.S.C. Section 2701 et seq.

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Brief

descriptionofcause:

Oilspill intoMarcelinasCreek, KarnesCounty,Tx,October 1998.

VII. REQUESTEDIN 0 CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND CHECK YESonlyif demanded incomplaint:

COMPLAINT: UNDERRULE23,F.R.Cv.P. JURY DEMAND: 0 Yes 0 No

VIII. RELATEDCASE(S)

IFANY (See instructions): JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER

References

Related documents

The projected gains over the years 2000 to 2040 in life and active life expectancies, and expected years of dependency at age 65for males and females, for alternatives I, II, and

Re- cently, the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change synthesized a vast array of literature on agriculture, food systems, food and nutritional se- curity,

Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park Comcast Center Mansfield Crossing T.P.C. Golf Club Norton Wheaton College Sensata Technologies Attleboro Crossing Wrentham Village

Commercial aircraft programs inventory included the following amounts related to the 747 program: $448 of deferred production costs at December 31, 2011, net of previously

innovation in payment systems, in particular the infrastructure used to operate payment systems, in the interests of service-users 3.. to ensure that payment systems

Perceived service quality, satisfaction, trust and image have chained link of positive affects, which leads to loyalty of customers in the telecom sector of

The cost of drug and medical materials are paid direct to the person or the entity supplied the drug or medical materials to the medical care institution and reported the amount

Repeated or prolonged exposure to spray mist may produce respiratory tract irritation leading to frequent attacks of bronchial infection.. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic