• No results found

Method of upper lower solutions for nonlinear system of fractional differential equations and applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Method of upper lower solutions for nonlinear system of fractional differential equations and applications"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

https://doi.org/10.26637/MJM0603/0001

Method of upper lower solutions for nonlinear

system of fractional differential equations and

applications

D.B. Dhaigude

1

*, N.B. Jadhav

2

and J.A. Nanware

3

Abstract

Our aim is to develop the method of upper lower solutions and apply it to prove existence and uniqueness of solution of periodic boundary value problems for a system of fractional differential equations involving a Riemann - Liouville fractional derivatives.

Keywords

Periodic boundary value problems, System of fractional differential equations, Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives, Upper and lower solutions, Existence and uniqueness results.

AMS Subject Classification 26A33;34A08,34B15,34B99.

1Department of Mathematics, Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad - 431 004, India. 2Department of Mathematics, Yeshwantrao Mahavidyalaya, Tuljapur-413 601, India.

3Department of Mathematics, Shrikrashana Mahavidyalaya, Gunjoti-413 601, India.

*Corresponding author:[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]

Article History: Received24January2018; Accepted21April2018 2018 MJM.c

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 467

2 Upper Lower Solutions. . . 467

3 Main Results. . . 469

4 Acknowledgement. . . 472

References. . . 472

1. Introduction

Now-a-days the theory of fractional differential equations have been occupying an importance place in science and tech-nology.Fractional differential equations have been widely used for modeling various processes in physics, chemistry,biology, aerodynamics of complex medium,polymer rheology, thermo-elasticity and control of dynamical systems(see [3,5,17] and the references therein). Recently, many researchers have given attention to the existence and uniqueness of solution of the initial value problems [8,15], periodic boundary value prob-lems [2,14,18], problems with integral boundary conditions [4,7,10–13] and with nonlocal integral boundary conditions [1] for fractional differential equations. It is well known that the method of upper and lower solutions [6,16]coupled with

its associated monotone iteration scheme is an interesting, constructive and powerful mechanism which offers existence and uniqueness results for nonlinear problems in a closed set. Recently,Wei et.al.[19] proved existence and uniqueness of the solution of periodic boundary value problem for a frac-tional differential equation,using the method of upper lower solutions and its associated monotone iterations.In this paper, we extend these results for nonlinear system of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations,by removing the bounded demand off(t,u(t))in [9].

We organize the paper as follows: In Section 2,we con-sider the periodic boundary value problem for nonlinear sys-tem of Riemann - Liouville fractional differential equations and introduce the notion of upper lower solution. Existence and uniqueness results of periodic boundary value problem for system of nonlinear fractional differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives are proved in the last section.

2. Upper Lower Solutions

(2)

and lower solutions.Consider the following system of nonlin-ear Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations

u

1(t) =f1 t,u1(t),u2(t)

,

u

2(t) =f2 t,u1(t),u2(t),

t∈ (0,T], 0<α≤1,

(2.1)

with periodic boundary conditions

t1−αu1(t)|t=0=t1−αu1(t)|t=T,

t1−αu2(t)|t=0=t1−αu2(t)|t=T.

(2.2)

It is called periodic boundary value problems(PBVP) for the system of nonlinear Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations. Assume thatJ= [0,T]⊂Ris a compact inter-val and fi(t,u1(t),u2(t))∈C([0,T]×R2,R),i=1,2.Further

assume thatu1 andu2are measurable Lebesgue functions i.e.u1,u2 ∈ L1(0,T). Suppose

C([0,T]) =

ui:ui(t)is continuous on[0,T],||ui||C= max t∈[0,T]|ui

(t)| ,i=1,2.

C1−α([0,T]) =ui∈C[0,T]:t1−αui(t)∈C([0,T]),||ui||C1−α=||t

1−α

ui||C .

Assume that upper and lower solutions satisfy the following order relation

(v1,v2)≤(w1,w2),t∈(0,T]:t1−αvi(t)|t=0≤t1−αwi(t)|t=0,i=1,2. (2.3) Now we define the order interval or ( functional interval )sector as follows:

Definition 2.1. The order interval in a space C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T)is denoted by S and is defined as

S=

(u1,u2)∈C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T): v1(t),v2(t)

≤ u1(t),u2(t)

w1(t),w2(t),t∈(0,T];t1−αvi(t)|t=0≤t1−αui(t)|t=0≤t1−αwi(t)|t=0

.

In the following,we define quasimonotonicity and Lipschitz condition of function fi(t,u1,u2),i=1,2 as follows.

Definition 2.2. A function fi(t,u1,u2)∈C(J×R2,R),i=1,2is said to be quasimonotone nondecreasing nonincreasingif

for each i,ui≤viand uj=vj,i6=j,then

fi(t,u1,u2)≤fi(t,v1,v2) fi(t,u1,u2)≥ fi(t,t,v1,v2).

Definition 2.3. Let fi(t,u1,u2):[0,T]×R2→Rbe a real valued continuous function. We say that fi(t,u1,u2)satisfies one

sided Lipschitz condition if there exists Mi≥0such that

f1(t,u1,u2)−f1(t,u∗1,u2)≥ −M1(u1−u∗1)for v1≤u∗1≤u1≤w1,

f2(t,u1,u2)−f2(t,u1,u∗2)≥ −M2(u2−u∗2)for v2≤u∗2≤u2≤w2.

(2.4)

Further to ensure the uniqueness of solution of PBVP (2.1)-(2.2),we assume that there existsNi≥0 such that

f1(t,u1,u2)−f1(t,u∗1,u2)≤N1(u1−u∗1)forv1≤u∗1≤u1≤w1,

f2(t,u1,u2)−f2(t,u1,u∗2)≤N2(u2−u∗2)forv2≤u∗2≤u2≤w2.

(2.5)

From conditions (2.4) and (2.5), we conclude that functionf=(f1,f2)satisfies Lipschitz condition

|fi(t,u1,u2)−fi(t,u∗1,u ∗

2)| ≤Ki(|u1−u∗1|+|u2−u∗2|), (2.6)

withMi=Ni=Ki.

Now we consider the following results of the linear PBVP for a fractional differential equation which are main

ingredi-ents in the proof of our existence and uniqueness results of solution of the PBVP (2.1)-(2.2).

(3)

prob-lem

u(t) +Mu(t) = σ(t),

t1−αu(t)|t=0=t1−αu(t)|t=T,

where M>0is a constant andσ∈C[0,T]has the following integral representation of the solution

u=T 1−α

Γ(α)tα−1Eα,α(−Mtα) [1−Γ(α)]Eα,α(−MTα)

(2.7)

(×)

Z T

0

(T−s)α−1Eα,α −M(T−s)ασ(s)ds

+

Z t

0

(t−s)α−1Eα,α −M(t−s)α

σ(s)ds, (2.8)

whereEα,α(t) =∑∞k=0 t

k

Γ((k+1)α)is the Mittag-Leffler func-tion (see [5]).

Lemma 2.5. [19] If u(t)∈C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T)and

satis-fies the relations

u(t) +Mu(t)0,t(0,T),

t1−αu(t)|t=0=t1−αu(t)|t=T,

where M>0is a constant,then u(t)≥0,t∈(0,T].

3. Main Results

In this section we develop method of upper lower solutions and construct two monotone convergent sequences,which converge monotonically from above and below to maximal and minimal solutions respectively. As an application of this method,existence and uniqueness results for the PBVP (2.1)−(2.2) are proved when the functions f1(t,u1,u2)and

f2(t,u1,u2)are quasimonotone nonincreasing as well as quasi-monotone nondecreasing

Theorem 3.1. Suppose that

(i) v0= (v01,v02)and w0= (w01,w02)∈C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T)

are lower and upper solutions of the PBVP(2.1)−(2.2),

such that order relation(2.3)holds,

(ii) function fi(t,u1,u2)∈C([0,T]×R2,R)satisfies one-sided

Lipschitz condition(2.4),

(iii) functions f1and f2are quasimonotone nondecreasing.

Then there exist monotone sequences

{vn1(t),vn2(t)},{wn1(t),wn2(t)} ⊂C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T)such

that

{vn1(t),vn2(t)} →(v1,v2)and{wn1(t),wn2(t)} →(w1,w2),

as n→∞on(0,T], where the functions (v1(t),v2(t))and (w1(t),w2(t))are minimal and maximal solutions on S for the

PBVP(2.1)−(2.2)and satisfy the monotone property v01≤v11≤...≤vn1≤...≤v1≤w1≤...≤wn1...≤w11≤w01,

v02≤v12≤...≤vn2≤...≤v2≤w2≤...≤wn2...≤w12≤w02. (3.1)

Also,if the one sided Lipschitz condition(2.5)holds,then the PBVP(2.1)−(2.2)has unique solution on S.

Proof:Consider PBVP for system of linear fractional dif-ferential equations

u

1(t) +M1u1=f1(t,η1,η2) +M1η1 =σ1(t,η1,η2),t∈(0,T),

t1−αu1(t)|t=0=t1−αu1(t)|t=T,

(3.2)

u

2(t) +M2u2=f2(t,η1,η2) +M2η2 =σ2(t,η1,η2),t∈(0,T),

t1−αu2(t)|t=0=t1−αu2(t)|t=T,

(3.3)

for any(η1,η2)∈S.Clearly,linear problems (3.2) and (3.3) have exactly one solutionu1(t)andu2(t)∈C1−α([0,T])∩

L1(0,T)respectively, follows from Lemma 2.1 and whose integral representation is as in (2.7). Now defineA[η1,µ] =

u1(t)as follows:

u1=

T1−αΓ(α)tα−1Eα,α(−M1tα) [1−Γ(α)]Eα,α(−M1Tα) (×)

Z T

0

(T−s)α−1Eα,α −M1(T−s)ασ1ds +

Z t

0

(t−s)α−1Eα,α −M1(t−s)ασ1ds. (3.4)

Also we define andA[η2,µ] =u2(t),as follows:

u2=

T1−αΓ(α)tα−1Eα,α(−M2tα) [1−Γ(α)]Eα,α(−M2Tα) (×)

Z T

0

(T−s)α−1Eα,α −M2(T−s)ασ2ds

+

Z t

0

(t−s)α−1Eα,α −M2(t−s)α

σ2ds. (3.5)

An operator A is from[v0i(t),w0i(t)]intoC1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T) andηiis solution of the PBVP (2.1)- (2.2) iffηi=A[ηi,µ].

Now we prove

(4)

To prove (I), set A[v0(t),w0(t)] =v1i(t) where v1i(t) = (v11(t),v12(t)).Note thatv11(t)andv12(t)are the unique solu-tions of linear PBVP (3.2) and (3.3) respectively. The func-tionv0i(t)is a lower solution of the PBVP (2.1)−(2.2).Set

pi(t) =v0i(t)−vi1(t)withηi=v0i(t).We observe that

p

i(t) =Dαv0i(t)−Dαv1i(t),

≤fi(t,v01(t),v02(t))−fi(t,v01(t),v02(t))

−Mi(v0i(t)−v1i(t)),

≤ −Mi(v0i(t)−v1i(t)),

p

i(t)≤ −Mipi(t),

and boundary conditions

t1−αpi(t)|t=0=t1−αv0i(t)|t=0−t1−αv1i(t)|t=0 =t1−αv0i(t)|t=T−t1−αv1i(t)|t=T

=t1−αpi(t)|t=T.

Using Lemma 2.2,we getpi(t)≤0 implies thatvi0(t)≤v1i(t) =

A[v0(t),w0(t)].To prove thatwi0(t)≥A[w0(t),v0(t)]; we set

A[w0(t),v0(t)] =w1i(t)where w1i(t) = (w11(t),w12(t)). Note thatw11(t)andw12(t))are the unique solutions of linear PBVP (3.2) and (3.3) respectively. The functionw0i(t)is an upper so-lution of the PBVP (2.1)−(2.2).Definepi(t) =w0i(t)−w1i(t)

withηi=w0i(t).We observe that

p

i(t) =Dαw0i(t)−Dαw1i(t),

p

i(t)≥ −Mipi(t),

and boundary conditions

t1−αpi(t)|t=0=t1−αw0i(t)|t=0−t1−αw1i(t)|t=0 =t1−αw0i(t)|t=T−t1−αw1i(t)|t=T

=t1−αpi(t)|t=T.

Using Lemma 2.2,we getpi(t)≥0 implies that

w0i(t)≥w1i(t) =A[w0(t),v0(t)].

Now,we prove (II).The operatorAis monotone.Let ¯η= (η1,η2) andµ= (µ1,µ2)in[v0(t),w0(t)]be such thatηi≤µi.

Sup-pose thatA[ηi,µ] =ui= (u1i,u2i)andA[η,µi] =vi= (v1i,v2i).

Considerpi(t) =ui(t)−vi(t)and observe that

p

i(t) =Dαui(t)−Dαvi(t)

=fi(t,η1,η2)−fi(t,µ1,µ2) +Mi(ηi−ui)

−Mi(µi−vi)

≤Mi(ηi−ui)−Mi(µi−vi) +Mi(µi−ηi)

≤ −Mi(ui(t)−vi(t)),

p

i(t)≤ −Mipi(t),

and boundary conditions

t1−αpi(t)|t=0=t1−αui(t)|t=0−t1−αvi(t)|t=0 =t1−αui|t=T−t1−αvi(t)|t=T

=t1−αpi(t)|t=T.

Applying Lemma 2.2,we getpi(t)≤0 implies thatui(t)≤

vi(t).HenceA[ηi,µ]≤A[η,µi]Thus the operatorApossess

the monotone property on[v0(t),w0(t)].Define the sequences

{vni}and{wni}byvin=A[vni−1,win−1]andwni =A[win−1,vni−1].

Using (3.6) and (3.7),we obtain

v0i ≤v1i ≤...≤vni ≤...≤win...≤w1i ≤wi0, i=1,2. (3.8) LetPi={vni :n=1,2, ...} andQi={wni :n=1,2, ...}.We

show that the sets Pi and Qi are relatively compact in

C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T).For anyηi∈Sand by definition of

lower and upper solution along with one sided Lipschitz con-dition,we have

v0

i +Miv0i ≤ fi(t,v01,v02) +Miv0i

≤ fi(t,η1,η2) +Miηi≤

fi(t,w01,w02) +Miw0i ≤Dαw0i+Miw0i.

LetPi={vni :n=1,2, ...},i=1,2 andS⊂C1−α([0,T])∩

L1(0,T)are bounded sets.Furthermore,the set{σi(t,η1,η2) =

fi(t,η1,η2) +Miηi|ηi∈S}is also a bounded set.Hence there

exist constantsBi,i=1,2 such that

||σi(t,vni)||= max

0≤t≤T|t

1−α

σi(t,vni)| (3.9)

≤Bi⇐⇒ |σi(t,vni)| ≤Bit1−α,t∈(0,T]

(3.10)

On the other hand{vni(t)|n=1,2, ...},i=1,2 satisfy

vni(t) =Γ(α)ui0e (−Mit)

α +

Z t

0

e(−Mi(t−s))

α σi(vni−1)(s)ds (3.11)

where

  

 

e(−Mit)

α =t α−1E

α,α(−Mitα)

ui0= T

1−α

[1−Γ(α)]Eα,α(−MiTα)

Rt

0e

(−Mi(t−s))

α σi(v n−1

i )(s)ds

From the condition (3.9),we have

  

 

|σi(t,η1,η2)| ≤Bit1−α,t∈(0,T],η1,η2∈Pi

|ui0| ≤ BiT

α

Γ(2α)[1−Γ(α)Eα,α(−MiTα)]

Without lose of generality,we assume that 0≤t1≤t2≤1 and forε>0 there existδ =δ(ε)when|t1−t2|<δ,and since

Eα,α(t)∈C[0,T],we have

|Eα,α(−Mit1α)−Eα,α(−Mit2α)|<

ε

3Γ(α)max{|ui0|,Bi/Mi}

,

(t2−t1)α<

εΓ(2α)

6BiΓ(α)

(5)

From above equations,we obtain

|t11−αvni(t1)−t21−αvni(t2)| (3.13) =|Γ(α)ui0[t11−αe

(−Mit1)

α −t

1−α

2 e

(−Mit2) α ]|+ [t11−αe(−Mit1)

α ∗σ(vn −1

i )(t1)−

t21−αe(−Mit1)

α ∗σi(vni−1)(t2)]

≤Γ(α)|ui0||Eα,α(−Mit1α)−Eα,α(−Mit2α)|+

LΓ(α)

Mi

|Eα,α(−Mit1α)−Eα,α(−Mit2α)|+ 2BiΓ(α)

Γ(2α) (t2−t1) α

<ε. (3.14)

This implies thatPiis equi-continuous and by the

Ascoli-Arzela theorem, we conclude thatPiis relatively compact set

ofC1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T). Similarly,we can show thatQiis

relatively compact set ofC1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T).Therefore,the sequences{vn1,vn2}and{w1n,wn2}converge uniformly to(v1,v2) and(w1,w2)on[0,T]respectively.We have point wise limits

{vn1(t),vn2(t)} →(v1,v2)and{wn1(t),wn2(t)} →(w1,w2) as n→∞on(0,T]. Moreover, by (3.8), the limit functions satisfy the following monotone property

v01≤v11≤...≤vn1≤...≤v1≤w1≤...≤wn1...≤w11≤w01

v02≤v12≤...≤vn2≤...≤v2≤w2≤...≤wn2...≤w12≤w02 (3.15)

Now,we prove that(v1,v2)and(w1,w2)are solutions of PBVP (2.1) - (2.2).We know

σ1(t,η1,η2) = f1(t,η1,η2) +M1η1

Clearly, the functionσ1is continuous and monotone non-decreasing and monotone convergence of{vn1(t)}tov1(t)as

n → ∞ on (0,T] implies that σ1(vn1)(t) converges to

σ1(v1)(t),t∈(0,T].Letn→∞in (3.11) and apply the domi-nated convergence theorem,we observe thatv1(t)satisfies the integral equation

v1(t) =N1

Z T

0

(T−s)α−1Eα,α −M1(T−s)α

σ1(v1)(s)ds +

Z t

0

(t−s)α−1Eα,α −M1(t−s)ασ1(v1)(s)ds, (3.16)

whereN1=

T1−αΓ(α)tα−1E

α,α(−M1tα)

[1−Γ(α)]Eα,α(−M1Tα) .We conclude thatv1(t)

is an integral representation of the solution to problem (3.2), i.e.v1(t)is an integral representation of the solution to problem

(2.1)-(2.2). By the assumption of the function f1and Lemma 2.1,v1(t)is the classical solution of the PBVP (2.1)-(2.2). This proves that the lower sequence{vn

1(t)}converges to a solution

v1(t)of problem (2.1)-(2.2). Further,we know

σ2(t,η1,η2) =f2(t,η1,η2) +M2η2

Clearly, the functionσ2is continuous and monotone non-decreasing and monotone convergence of{vn2(t)}tov2(t)as

n→∞on(0,T],implies thatσ2(v2n)(t)converges toσ2(v2)(t),t∈ (0,T].Let n→∞in (3.11) and apply the dominated con-vergence theorem,we observe thatv2(t)satisfies the integral equation

v2 =N2

Z T

0

(T−s)α−1Eα,α −M2(T−s)ασ2(v2)ds +

Z t

0

(t−s)α−1Eα,α −M2(t−s)ασ2(v2)(s)ds, (3.17)

whereN2=T

1−αΓ(α)tα−1

Eα,α(−M2tα)

[1−Γ(α)]Eα,α(−M2Tα) .We conclude thatv2(t)

is an integral representation of the solution to problem (3.3), i.e.v2(t)is an integral representation of the solution to problem (2.1)-(2.2).By the assumption of the function f2and lemma 2.1,v2(t)is the classical solution of the PBVP (2.1)-(2.2).This proves that the lower sequence{vn2(t)}converges to a solution

v2(t)of the problem (2.1)-(2.2). Similarly,we can prove that upper sequence{wn1,wn2}converge uniformly to a solution (w1,w2)of periodic boundary value problems (2.1) - (2.2) and satisfies the relationv1(t)≤w1(t)andv2(t)≤w2(t)t∈(0,T]. It follows that relations (3.1) hold as well as (v1,v2) and (w1,w2)are minimal and maximal solutions of the PBVP (2.1)-(2.2) on the order interval S respectively.

Finally, if condition (2.9) holds, thenvi(t) =wi(t),i=1,2

is a unique solution of the PBVP (2.1)-(2.2). It is sufficient to provevi(t)≥wi(t),t∈(0,T],since we havevi(t)≤wi(t).

We observe that the functionui(t) =vi(t)−wi(t)satisfies the

relations

u

i(t) +M1ui(t) =−[fi(t,w1,w2)−fi(t,vi,v2)] +M1(vi(t)−wi(t))≥0

t1−αui(t)|t=0=t1−αui(t)|t=T, i=1,2, t∈(0,T]

Then Lemma 2.3 implies that ui(t)≥0,t ∈(0,T], which

provesvi(t)≥wi(t),t∈(0,T]and hence we obtain thatvi(t) =

wi(t)is a unique solution of the PBVP (2.1)-(2.2). This

com-pletes the proof.

Corollary 3.2. Assume that

(i) v0= (v01,v02)and w0= (w01,w02)∈C1−α([0,T])∩L1(0,T)

are lower and upper solutions of the PBVP(2.1)−(2.2),

such that order relation(2.3)holds,

(ii) function fi(t,u1,u2)∈C([0,T)×R2,R) satisfies

(6)

(iii) functions f1and f2are quasimonotone nondecreasing.

Then the PBVP(2.1)−(2.2)has unique solution in the order interval.

Proof. Observe that

−Ki(ui−ui∗)≤fi(t,u1,u2)−fi(t,u∗1,u∗2) (3.18)

≤Ki(ui−u∗i), (3.19)

for v0i ≤u∗i ≤ui≤w0i,which follows from (2.6) i.e.Lipschitz

conditions (2.4) and (2.5) hold withKi=Mi.Then the

Theo-rem 3.1 implies that the problem (2.1)-(2.2) has one and only one solution in the ordered interval.

4. Acknowledgement

The first author is grateful to the UGC,New Delhi for award ofEmeritus Fellowship No.F.6-6/2015-17/EMERITUS-2015-17-OBC-7176/(SA-II)

References

[1] R. Chaudhary and D. N. Pandey, Existence results for

nonlinear fractional differential equation with nonlocal integral boundary conditions,Malaya J. Mat., 4(3)(2016), 392–403.

[2] D.B. Dhaigude,J.A.Nanware and V.R.Nikam,Monotone

technique for weakly coupled system of Caputo frac-tional differential equations with periodic boundary con-ditions,Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems,Series A: Mathematical Analysis,19(2012),575– 584.

[3] R. Hilfer,Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics,

World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.

[4] N.B.Jadhav and J.A.Nanware, Integral boundary value

problem for system of nonlinear fractional differential equations,Bull. Marathwada Math. Soc.,18(2)(2017), 23–31.

[5] A.A.Kilbas,H.M.Srivastava and J.J.Trujillo,Theory and

Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Else-vier, Amsterdam, 2006.

[6] G.S.Ladde,V.Lakshmikantham and A.S.Vatsala,

Mono-tone Iterative Techniques for Nonlinear Differential Equa-tions, Pitman Pub.Co.Boston, 1985.

[7] X. Liu, M. Jia and B. Wu, Existence and uniqueness of

solution for fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions,EJQTDE,69(2009),1–10.

[8] F.A.McRae, Monotone iterative technique and existence

results for fractional differential Equations,Nonlinear Analysis:TMA,71(12)(2009), 6093–6096.

[9] Mohammed Belmekki,J.J.Nieto and Rosana

Rodr´ıguez-L´opez,Existence of periodic solutions for a nonlinear frac-tional differential equation,Boundary Value Problems,

2009(2009) Art. ID. 324561.

[10] J.A.Nanware and D.B.Dhaigude, Monotone iterative

scheme for system of Riemann-Liouville fractional

differential equations with integral boundary condi-tions,Math. Modelling Science Computation, Springer-Verlag, 283(2012), 395–402.

[11] J.A.Nanware and D.B.Dhaigude, Existence and

unique-ness Of solution of Riemann-Liouville fractional differ-ential equations with integral boundary conditions,Inter. J.Nonl. Sci.,14(4)(2012), 410–415.

[12] J.A.Nanware,N.B.Jadhav and D.B.Dhaigude, Monotone

iterative technique for finite system of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions,Internat. Conf. Math. Sci.,June 2014, 235– 238.

[13] J.A.Nanware and D.B.Dhaigude, Existence and

unique-ness of solutions of differential equations of fractional or-der with integral boundary conditions,J. Nonlin Sci.Appl.,

7(2014), 246–254.

[14] J.A.Nanware and D.B. Dhaigude,Monotone technique

for finite weakly coupled system of Caputo fractional differential equations with periodic boundary condi-tions,Dyn.Cont., Dis. Impul. Syst.Series A: Math. Anal.,

22(1)(2015), 13–23.

[15] J.A.Nanware, N.B.Jadhav and D.B.Dhaigude, Initial

value problems for fractional differential equations in-volving Riemann-Liouville derivative,Malaya J. Mat., 5(2)(2017), 337–345.

[16] C.V.Pao, Nonlinear Parabolic and Elliptic Equations,

New York,Plenum Press,1992.

[17] I. Podlubny,Fractional Differential Equations,Academic

Press, San Diego, 1999.

[18] J. Vasundhara Devi, Generalized monotone method for

periodic boundary value problems of Caputo fractional differential equations,Comm. Appl.Anal.,12(4)(2008), 399 – 406.

[19] Z.Wei, W. Dong and J. Che, Periodic boundary value

problems for fractional differential equations involving a Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative,Nonlinear Anal-ysis,73(2010), 3232–3238.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ISSN(P):2319−3786 Malaya Journal of Matematik

References

Related documents

Another qualitative study on treatment coordination in primary care models reported that while continuity and information sharing is important, they are not adequate to provide

APTT: Activated partial thromboplastin time; ARBDs: Autosomal recessive bleeding disorders; BT: Bleeding time; CFD: Clotting factor deficiency; GT: Glanzmann ’ s thrombasthenia;

It was more meaningful for estimation the physical parameters of oceanic internal waves based on MODIS by the developed intelligent software after the remote

percussion on back, roll over and postural drainage. Patients in observation group were treated with pulmonary physical therapy additionally: 1) Qualified patients

Here, we report results of screening a Gal4 DNA-binding domain hybrid library for proteins that cause silencing when targeted to a silencer-defective HMR locus.. T

Therefore, a cross sectional study was conducted in Western Uganda to compare levels of antibodies to HPV-16/18 and other hrHPV types among vaccinated and unvaccinated Ugandan girls

Figure 15 indicates that the compressive strength and the thermal con- ductivity are correlated with additives ratios.. It is possible to predict the thermal conductivity and

Observations with Assigned Clusters (Combined) for Wait, NASA-TLX, &amp; Temporal Sensitivity Solution, faceted by Latency (2/3).. Observations with Assigned Clusters (Combined)