Investigation of pulsed D.C magnetron
sputtering for the component layers of
CuInSe2 baseed solar cells
Karthikeyan, Sreejith, Hill, AE and Pilkington, RD
Title Investigation of pulsed D.C magnetron sputtering for the component layers of CuInSe2 baseed solar cells
Authors Karthikeyan, Sreejith, Hill, AE and Pilkington, RD
Type Conference or Workshop Item
URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/19232/ Published Date 2011
USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for noncommercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions.
CMMP 11
Investigation of pulsed D C magnetron sputtering for the
CMMP 11
Investigation of pulsed D.C magnetron sputtering for the
component layers of CuInSe
2based solar cells
S jith K thik A th Hill d Ri h d Pilki t
Materials and Physics Research Centre University of Salford, UK
Introduction
CIS/CIGS thin film based solar cells are the most promising renewable energy source because of their relatively high solar efficiency and stability
because of their relatively high solar efficiency and stability.
Single crystal Si cells need more material to absorb light due to its indirect band gap.
In CIS the defect mechanisms makes it a direct semiconducting materials and no doping is needed
needed.
Presently CIGS cells have achieved a maximum efficiency of 20.3% [1]. A typical cell CIS/CIGS structure is in the form of a heterojunction.yp j
CdS~ 50nm
i-ZnO~ 70nm
ZnO ~ 1?m
CdS~ 50nm
i-ZnO~ 70nm
Al-ZnO ~ 1µm
N- type buffer layer
Intrinsic ZnO layer to reduce leakage current Transparent Conductive Oxide layer
Substrate Mo layer ~ 0.8? m
CuInSe2~ 1.0? m
CdS 50nm
Substrate
Mo layer ~ 0.8
CdS 50nm
µm
CuInSe2~ 2µm
N type buffer layer P- type absorber layer
Back Contact
1
References
[1] P. Jackson et. al Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, (2011) EU PVSEC WCPEC-5, Valencia, Spain, 2010. Substrate
Substrate
The first published report of a CuInSe2 thin film was by the R.D Tomlinson group at the University of Salford in 1974 [2]
Introduction
the University of Salford in 1974 [2].
Films of CIS are generally made by multi-step processes
My work has been focussed on a SINGLE STEP process which can deposit films ith
with.
9 Nearly stoichiometric ratio.
9 p-type characteristics.
9 No secondary phases.
9 No additional substrate heating for crystallisation.
9 Less material wastage.
9 No carbon, oxygen, chlorine etc. contamination.
This work reports such a single step deposition process for nearly stoichiometric p-type CIS layers and also for the other component layers of a cell using Pulsed D.C Magnetron
No carbon, oxygen, chlorine etc. contamination.
y p y g g
Sputtering (PDMS) from powder targets.
2
References
Materials Deposited
1 Molybdenum (back contact)
1. Molybdenum (back contact)
2. Copper indium diselenide (absorber layer)
3. Indium sulphide (buffer layer)
4. Indium oxide (Transparent Conductive Oxide layer)
Sputtered in argon atmosphere from commercial Mo powder.
Films sputtered at different substrate temperatures
Molybdenum Films
XRD of Mo Films
Deposition Parameters
Pressure : 7.0x10-3mbar
Mode : Constant Power (50W) Frequency : 75 kHz
M l 205 0
(110)
Frequency : 75 kHz Pulse off Time : 0.5 µs Distance : 10 cm
Body-centred cubic phase
Molp205
Molp204
300 0C
250 0C
ty
(arb.u
nit)
Body-centred cubic phase
With increase in
substrate temperature Molp203
Molp202
M l 201
200 0C
0
150 0C
In
ten
si
t
A shift in 2θ towards higher angles was noticed.
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Molp201 Molp200
100 0C 47 0C
2θ (degrees)
5
2θ (degrees)
S. Karthikeyan et al, Nano-structured features of pulsed d.c magnetron sputtered Mo films for photovoltaic application Thin Solid Films, 2011, accepted for publication.
Strain Analysis of Mo Films
40 2 40.4
3
40.0 40.2
2
θ
2 St
ra
i
39.6 39.8
2
1
n %
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 39.4
T t
0
Temperature
Strain % reduced with increase in temperature
2.2x10-3
Resistivity Analysis of Mo Films
1.6x10-3 1.8x10-3
2.0x10-3 Resistivity
1.0x10-3 1.2x10-3 1.4x10-3
ivity (
Ω
cm
)
4 0x10-4 6.0x10-4 8.0x10-4
Resi
st
i
50 100 150 200 250 300
2.0x10-4 4.0x10
Temperature (p (0C))
Resistivity reduced with increase in temperature
SEM and AFM Studies of Mo Films
No heating
SEM AFM
g
Morphological
200 nm
p g
change from a
cluster of small grains to a fibrous, columnar needle like 400 nm
150 0C columnar needle-like
structure for films grown at 150 0C
200 nm
8 Al-Thani, H.A et al, 2002,Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference,pp 720-3 .
References
S tt d i t h Sputtered in argon atmosphere from our CuInSe2 powder.
Films sputtered from CIS powder s sputte ed o C S po de with different compositions
C
I di
Di l
id Fil
Copper Indium Diselenide Films
CuInSe
2Crystal Growth
Selenium, Indium and Copper
inside quartz tube before sealing CuInSe2inside ampoule after direct fusion
CuInSe2polycrystalline ingots CuInSe2powder
10
References
XRD of CuInSe
2Films
Deposition Parameters
12)
Pressure : 7.5x10-3mbar
Mode : Constant Current (0.12A Frequency : 130 kHz
Pulse off Time : 1.0 µs Distance : 10 cm
CIST116 (220/ (301)
204)
(1
(116/
312)
5 % extra In
CIST115 CIST114 CIST113 s ity (arb . un it)
5 % extra Se
(21.54:24.29:54.17) (20.53:27.97:51.50)
CIST111 CIST112 In te n s
Nearly stoichiometric powder (23.03:23.32:53.66)
( )
Preferred (112) orientation
Single Phase
10 20 30 40 50 60
CIST104 CIST105
In rich powder (19.95 : 34 .10 : 45.95 )
g
No heating !!
10 20 30 40 50 60
2θ
11
Reference
Ternary Diagram of CuInSe
2Films and Powder
45 50 40 45 45 50 4045 Stoichiometric Point
In % 30 35 45 Se % 50 55 60 65 40 In % 30 35 45 Se % 50 55 60 65
40 Starting Powder Composition Film Composition 10 15 20 25 65 70 75 80 10 15 20 25 65 70 75 80 30 0 32.5 47.5 50.0 30 0 32.5 47.5 50.0 Cu %
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 10
Cu %
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 10
In %
25 0 27.5 30.0
Se % 52.5
55.0 25 0 27.5 30.0 52.5 55.0 Ternary Diagram 20.0 22.5 25.0 57.5 60.0 20.0 22.5 25.0 57.5 60.0 y g
All films were p-type
Cu %
20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5
20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5
12
References
Optical Studies of CuInSe
2Films
2 4
2 2
1 (1 ) ((1 )
.ln
2. 4.
R R
R
d T T
α = − ⎛⎜⎜ − + − + ⎞⎟⎟
⎝ ⎠ 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 ctran ce Transmittance Reflectance 1.00E+013 1.004 eV CIS 3Hr ⎝ ⎠ 0 3 0.4 0.5 0.6 tance / Refel c 4 00E+012 6.00E+012 8.00E+012 ( α h ν ) 2
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 T ransm it t
0 6 0 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 0.00E+000
2.00E+012 4.00E 012
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Wavelength (nm)
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
hν
Band gap is very close to the reported value of 1 02 eV
Band gap is very close to the reported value of 1.02 eV
Sputtered in argon atmosphere from commercial In2S3 powder.
Films sputtered at different Films sputtered at different substrate temperatures
I di
S l hid Fil
Indium Sulphide Films
XRD f I S Fil
XRD of In
2S
3Films
Deposition Parameters
Pressure : 7 3x10-3mbar
Pressure : 7.3x10 mbar Mode : Constant Power (25 W) Frequency : 100 kHz
Pulse off Time : 0.5 µs Distance : 8 cm
(2 2 12) (1 0 15) (0 0 12) (206) (1 0 9 )
250 0C
(103)
(116
)
200 0C
ty (
a
rb
.u
)
150 0C
100 0C
In te n s it
Preferred (109)
orientation
Tetragonal –
β
In
2S
310 20 30 40 50 60
2θ (degrees)
No Heating
Tetragonal
β
In
2S
3formed with
No heating !!
2θ (degrees)
1.0
Optical and AFM studies of In
2S
3Films
No heating 100 0C
Band gap decreased with
0.6 0.8
m
ittanc
e
200 nm 200 nm
decrease in sulphur content
0.0 0.2 0.4
Tra
n
sm No heating
100 0C 150 0C 200 0C 250 0C
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Wavelength (nm)
Deposition % In %S [% ]S Band Gap
200 nm 200 n
Temperature eV
Non heated 41.26 58.74 1.42 2.768
1000C 41.84 58.16 1.39 2.735
1500C 42.86 57.14 1.33 2.708
[% ]In
250 0C
150 C 42.86 57.14 1.33 2.708
2000C 43.5 56.5 1.29 2.667
2500C 48.51 51.49 1.20 2.526
Reactive sputtered in oxygen and Reactive sputtered in oxygen and argon atmosphere from
commercial In2O3 powder.
Fil tt d t diff t
Films sputtered at different oxygen flow rates with no additional heating
Indium Oxide Films
In
2O
3Films
Deposition Parameters
Pressure : 4.0x10-3Pa
X-ray diffraction spectra
Mode : Constant Power (60W) Frequency : 60 kHz
Pulse off Time : 0.5 µs Distance : 9 cm
MFC : FAr+ FOxygen = 20sccm
1000 1200
uni
t)
(222)
Thickness ~ 500 nm
200 400 600 800 n te n sity (a rb . 0 200 0 % 2.5 % 5 % I n (440) (400) (211)
Cubic bixbyite In2O3 phase.
20 30 40 50 60
5 % 10 %
2θ (deg)
Preferred (400) (440) orientation at higher O2 concentration
Resistivity of In
2O
3Films
4 5
Resistivity
5.09 Ω cm
2 3
s
ti
vi
ty (
Ω
cm
)
Strongly n-type 0 - 2.5% O2
Weakly n-type 5 – 10% O2
0 1
Re
si
s
0.00519 Ω cm
Weakly n type 5 10% O2
0.00536 Ω cm
0 2 4 6 8 10
% of O2 in gas flow
Optical Properties of In
2O
3Films
80 100 ) 60 m it tance ( % ) 1.25E+015 1.50E+015 1.75E+015 3.72 eV 10.0% oxygen flow) 20 40 Trans m O
2 flow
0 % 2.5 % 5.0 % 3.64 eV 3.70 eV 3.67 eV 2.50E+014 5.00E+014 7.50E+014 1.00E+015 ( α h ν )2 (m -2.eV 2 )
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
0
Wavelength (nm)
5.0 % 10 % 3.72 eV
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0.00E+000
hν (eV)
20
23.66 nm
0% O2. Ra – 2.63nm 2.5% O 28.35 nm
2 Ra – 3.06nm
AFM of In
2O
3Films
0.00 nm 200nm
0.00 nm 200nm
30.43 nm 37.85 nm
5.0% O2 Ra – 3.60 nm 10.0% O2 Ra – 4.64 nm
0.00 nm 200nm
0.00 nm 200nm
21
References
Conclusion
¾ The possibilities of pulsed d c magnetron sputtering for the deposition of Mo
¾ The possibilities of pulsed d.c magnetron sputtering for the deposition of Mo, CuInSe2 In2S3 and In2O3 films from powdered targets were studied.
¾ The analysis showed that these PDMS grown films can be used for solar cell applications
applications.
¾ The most surprising outcome is the nearly stoichometric nature of the CIS films
largely irrespective of the starting composition of the material
¾ i l h d fil d d i h i i h h
¾ Single phase CIS and In2S3 films were produced using PDMS technique without the aid of additional substrate heating.
¾ Films grown from this single step process can cut down the cost and also the
d l i i h h i l b i d i h h
dangerous selenisation processes that have previously been associated with the production of high efficiency CIS solar cells.
Acknowledgements
¾Prof. D.M. Bagnall, School of Electronics and Computer Science , University of Southampton.
¾Prof. P.J. Kelly, Manchester Metropolitan University.
¾Dr. J. Hisek, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hannover, Germany
¾Dr. H. Yates, Materials and Physics Research Centre , University of Salford
¾Dr J S Cowpe Materials and Physics Research Centre University of Salford
¾Dr. J.S. Cowpe , Materials and Physics Research Centre , University of Salford
¾Mr. G. Parr, Salford Analytical Services, University of Salford.
¾Mr. J. Smith, Physics Technician , University of Salford.
¾Mr. M. Clegg, Physics Technician , University of Salford.
Finally , thanks to everybody who has indirectly helped to bring this work to fruition.
THANK FOR YOUR ATTENTION
THANK FOR YOUR ATTENTION
23
email : [email protected]
Pulsed D.C. Magnetron Sputtering System
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0
100
T (μs) Pulse off Substrate (Anode) K-type Thermocouple Substrate (Anode) K-type Thermocouple
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
-300 -200 -100 V o lt age ( V ) Argon
S/S*Cover
Camera MFC 100 sccm p Argon
S/S*Cover
Camera MFC 100 sccm p -500 -400 Pulse on
Ideal pulsed d.c signal for 100kHz
N S N Cu -Target HolderMagnets Water Channel PTFE Insulator
S/S*Base
Window
N S N Cu -Target HolderMagnets Water Channel PTFE Insulator
S/S*Base
Window Water cooling Turbo & Rotary pump Substrate Heater + Ni-Cr Ni-Al Water cooling Turbo & Rotary pump Substrate Heater + Ni-Cr Ni-Al
AE Pinnacle Plus Power Supply
Rotary pump
+
-AE Pinnacle Plus Power Supply
Rotary pump
+
-4
Reference
S. Karthikeyan et al, Vacuum, 2010, 85; pp.634-638.
SEM and AFM CuInSe
2Films
~180-210 nm particle size
From stoichiometric powder From 5% extra Se powder From 5% extra In powder 180 210 nm particle size
500 nm 500 nm 500 nm
1 7