• No results found

Simultaneous Fault Examples

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Simultaneous Fault Examples"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Simultaneous Fault Examples

pu := 1 MVA:= 1000kW a:= 1ej 120 deg A012 1 1 1 1 a2 a 1 a a2

:= 13.8kV 100MVA ZS1 = j0.3 pu V = 1.0pu BUS 1 BUS 2 ZL1 = 0.8 pu 85o ZR1 = j0.3 pu RelayR1 24kV 100MVA RelayR2 V = 1.0pu 13.8kV: 230kV 100MVA X = 10% X/R = 15 -Yg BUS S 230:24kV 100MVA X = 10% X/R = 15 Yg- BUS R on 100MVA and 230kV ZR2 = ZR1 ZR0 = j1.0 pu ZS2 = ZS1 ZS0 = j1.0 pu ZL2 = ZL1 ZL0 = 3ZL1 Z2 = Z0 = Z1 Z2 = Z0 = Z1 VB1 := 13.8kV VB2 VB1 230 kV 13.8kV

 := VB2 = 230 kV VB3 VB2 13.8 kV 230kV

 := VB3 = 13.8 kV

Local source (no change of base needed):

· · Remote source (no change of base needed):

ZS1 := j 0.3 pu ZR1 := j 0.3 pu

ZS2 := ZS1 ZR2 := ZR1

(2)

Transmission line: ·

ZL1 := 0.8pu e j 85 deg ZL1 = (0.0697+0.797i) pu ZL2:= ZL1

ZL0 := 3 Z L1 ZL0 = (0.2092+2.3909i) pu

Transformer between BusS and Bus1 (no change of base needed) · θT1 atan 15 1

:= XT11 := 0.1pu mag_ZT11 XT11 sin

(

θT1

)

:= ZT11 mag_ZT11 e jθT1  := ZT11 = (0.0067+0.1i) pu

- Negative and zero sequence impedances equal to positive sequence impedance: ZT12:= ZT11 ZT10:= ZT11

Transformer between BusR and Bus2 (no change of base needed) · θT2 atan 15 1

:= XT21 := 0.1pu mag_ZT21 XT21 sin

(

θT2

)

:= ZT21 mag_ZT21 e jθT2  := ZT21 = (0.0067+0.1i) pu

(3)

Positive sequence per unit, per phase, equivalent circuit: BusS 1.0 Bus1 Bus2 ZL1 Src1 Src2 BusR 1.0 ZR1 ZT21 ZS1 ZT11 +30 deg +30 deg N1

Negative sequence per unit, per phase, equivalent circuit:

BusS Bus1 Bus2

ZL2 BusR ZR2 ZT22 ZS2 ZT12 -30 deg -30 deg N2

Zero sequence per unit, per phase, equivalent circuit:

BusS Bus1 BusR

ZR0 ZT20

Bus2

ZS0

ZT10 ZL0

Define Zbus matrices, but the fault bus needs to be added as a function of M for now. ·

(4)

YBus1(M) 1 ZS1 1 ZT11 + 1 - e j 30 deg ZT11 0 0 0 1 - e-j30deg ZT11 1 ZT11 1 M Z L1 + 0 0 1 -M Z L1 0 0 1 1-M ( ) Z L1 1 ZT21 + 1 - e -j30deg ZT21 1 -1-M ( ) Z L1 0 0 1 - e j 30 deg ZT21 1 ZT21 1 ZR1 + 0 0 1 -M Z L1 1 -1-M ( ) Z L1 0 1 M Z L1 1 1-M ( ) Z L1 +

:= YBus2(M) 1 ZS2 1 ZT12 + 1 - e -j30deg ZT12 0 0 0 1 - ej 30 deg ZT12 1 ZT12 1 M Z L2 + 0 0 1 -M Z L2 0 0 1 1-M ( ) Z L2 1 ZT22 + 1 - e j 30 deg ZT22 1 -1-M ( ) Z L2 0 0 1 - e -j30deg ZT22 1 ZT22 1 ZR2 + 0 0 1 -M Z L2 1 -1-M ( ) Z L2 0 1 M Z L2 1 1-M ( ) Z L2 +

:=

(5)

YBus0(M) 1 ZS0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ZT10 1 M Z L0 + 0 0 1 -M Z L0 0 0 1 1-M ( ) Z L0 1 ZT20 + 0 1 -1-M ( ) Z L0 0 0 0 1 ZR0 0 0 1 -M Z L0 1 -1-M ( ) Z L0 0 1 M Z L0 1 1-M ( ) Z L0 +

:= ZBus1(M) := YBus1(M)-1 ZBus2(M) := YBus2(M)-1 ZBus0(M) := YBus0(M)-1

Simultaneous AG and BC faults 30% of the way from Bus 1 to Bus 2

I1 +I2 = 2 I 0 V1 = V2 1 -2 V0 = Vf := 1.0pu No load M:= 0.3

(6)

I1 Vf ZBus1(M) 4 4, 1 ZBus2(M) 4 4, 1 ZBus0(M) 4 4,

(

)

14 +

1 -+ := I1 = 2.055 pu arg I

( )

1 = -86.871deg I2 -I1 ZBus0(M) 4 4,

(

)

4 ZBus2(M) 4 4, ZBus0(M) 4 4,

(

)

4 +

 := I2 = 0.55 pu arg I

( )

2 = 91.613 deg I0 I1 2 ZBus2(M) 4 4, ZBus2(M) 4 4, ZBus0(M) 4 4,

(

)

4 +

 := I0 = 0.752 pu arg I

( )

0 = -86.316deg I1 +I2

(

)

-2 I 0 = 0 V1 Vf I1 ZBus1(M) 4 4,  -:= V1 = 0.211 pu arg V

( )

1 = -1.196deg V2 -I2 ZBus2(M) 4 4,  := V2 = 0.211 pu arg V

( )

2 = -1.196deg V0 -I0 ZBus0(M) 4 4,  := V0 = 0.423 pu arg V

( )

0 = 178.804 deg

(7)

V0 -2 -V1 = 0 VABC A012 V0 V1 V2

 := VABC   0 0.634 0.634





= arg VABC 1

(

)

= 178.804 deg arg VABC 2

(

)

= 178.804 deg Very close to ATP IABC A012 I0 I1 I2

 := IABC   2.257 2.256 2.256





= arg I

(

ABC

)

  -86.316 177.191 -2.809





deg  =

SLG or LL alone (without simultaneous):

SLG · I0slg Vf ZBus1(M) 4 4, +ZBus2(M)4 4, +ZBus0(M)4 4,

(

)

:= I0slg = 0.752 arg I

(

0slg

)

= -86.316deg IA_slg := 3 I 0slg I

(8)

LL · I1LL Vf ZBus1(M) 4 4, +ZBus2(M)4 4, := IABCLL A012 10-15 I1LL I1LL

-

 := IABCLL   0 2.256 2.256





= arg I

(

ABCLL

)

  0 177.191 -2.809





deg  = IABCLL-IABC 0.145 - +2.253i 0 0





= IA_slg 0 0

IABCLL + -IABC 0 0 0





=

(9)

VS BUSS V BUS1 R1 I BUSF V V SAT Y V BUS2 R2 I YSAT BUSR V VR IA IC I I B I I A I V

ATP System Model

·

Fault Currents (versus time): ·

(f ile Simult_AG_BC.pl4; x-v ar t) c:BUSFA -IA c:BUSFB -IB c:BUSFC -IC

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 [s] 0.10 -3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 [A]

Note that: IC = -IB ·

IA = 2.257A θA:= -86.24deg

IB = 2.257A θA:= -177.1deg

(10)

Voltages at the fault point: ·

(f ile Simult_AG_BC.pl4; x-v ar t) v :BUSFA v :BUSFB v :BUSFC

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 [s] 0.10 -0.9 -0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 [V] VAG = 0V VBG = 0.6339V θVB := 178.9deg VCG = 0.6339V θVC := 178.9deg

References

Related documents

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to describe a novel fault tolerant tracking control (FTTC) strategy based on robust fault estimation and compensation of

2) The proposed control scheme is able to tolerate both single actuator fault and simultaneous actuator faults, where not only the control re-allocation scheme needs to be triggered

Calculate the synchronous impedance and the synchronous reactance per phase for this machine, using the highest point given on the saturation or open circuit voltage curve to obtain

negative linear 217 nonlinear 219, 241 positive linear 217 Bernoulli model 298 Bernoulli trials 79 biased estimator 78 biased sample 64. binomial distribution 303 bivariate

Detection of mechanical load faults in induction motors at variable speed using stator current time-frequency analysis, Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for

Where the design data of a heat exchanger contains no UA-value (this is the case for apparatuses of type 5, which is used here for modelling the condenser), then the program

Here we are talking about Simultaneous ac–dc power transmission which was earlier proposed through a single circuit ac transmission line with uni-polar dc link

observer design and static output feedback stabilization for non-linear un- certain systems, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 19 (3)