• No results found

On the Zeros of Complex Polynomials in a Given Circle

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On the Zeros of Complex Polynomials in a Given Circle"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

e-ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com

Volume 8, Issue 11 (October 2013), PP. 54-61

On the Zeros of Complex Polynomials in a Given Circle

M. H. Gulzar

Department of Mathematics University of Kashmir, Srinagar 190006

Abstract:- The problemof finding the number of zeros of a polynomial in a given circle is of great interest in the theory of the distribution of zeros of polynomials. In this paper we consider the said problem under certain conditions on the coefficients of the polynomial or their real and imaginary parts and prove certain results that generalize some well-known results on the subject.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C10, 30C15

Keywords and phrases:- Coefficient, Polynomial, Zero.

I.

INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF RESULTS

In the literature many results have been proved on the number of zeros of a polynomial in a given circle. Recently M. H. Gulzar [3] proved the following results:

Theorem A: : Let Let

0

)

(

j j j

z

a

z

P

be a polynomial o f degree n such that

Re(

a

j

)

j,

Im(

a

j

)

j

and for some positive integers

,

and for some real numbers

k

1

,

k

2

,

1

,

2,

.

...

...

...

...

0 2 1 1

1 2

0 1 1 1

1 1

 

 

 

 

n n

n n

k

k

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

z

,

0

1

does not exceed

0 *

log

1

log

1

a

M

, where

M

*

a

n

(

k

1

1

)

n

(

k

2

1

)

n

2

(

)

(

k

1

n

k

2

n

)

(

1

1

)

0

1

0

(

2

1

)

0

2

0

a

0 .

Theorem B: Let Let

0

)

(

j j j

z

a

z

P

be a polynomial o f degree n such that

Re(

a

j

)

j,

Im(

a

j

)

j

and for some positive integers

,

,

,

and for some real numbers

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

;

,

,

,

;

,

,

,

2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

1

k

k

k

k

k

k

k

k

,

0

1

1

,

0

2

1

,

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

1

2

3

4

,

.

.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

1 4 3 1

2 1 2 1

] 2 [ 2 2

0 3 2 2

2 2 ]

2 [ 2 3

1 2 3 1

2 1 2 1

] 2 [ 2 2

0 1 2 2

2 2 ]

2 [ 2 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

n n n n

k

k

k

k

(2)

M

a

r

1

0 and

n

a

M

r

2

,

with

1 4

3 1 2

1 1

1

(

1

)

(

1

)

(

1

)

(

1

)

a

n

a

n

a

k

n

k

n

k

n

k

n

M

1 4

0 3 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 2

1 4 1 2 3

1 1 2 2 1 2 2

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

2

k

n

k

n

k

n

k

n

and

1 4

3 1 2

1 0 1

1

(

1

)

(

1

)

(

1

)

(

1

)

a

n

a

a

k

n

k

n

k

n

k

n

M

.

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

2

1 4

0 3 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 2

1 4 1 2 3

1 1 2 2 1 2 2

k

n

k

n

k

n

k

n

If n is odd, then P(z) has all its zeros in the disk

R

1

z

R

2, where

M

a

R



0

1 and

n

a

M

R

2



,

and

M



and

M



are respectively the same as

M

and

M

, except that

k

1

,

k

2

,

k

3

,

k

4 are respectively replaced by

k

2

,

k

1

,

k

4

,

k

3

.

In this paper we shall find a bound for the number of zeros of the polynomials of Theorems A and B in a circle of any positive radius. In fact, we prove the following results:

Theorem 1: Let Let

0

)

(

j j j

z

a

z

P

be a polynomial o f degree n such that

Re(

a

j

)

j,

Im(

a

j

)

j

and for some positive integers

,

and for some real numbers

,

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

;

,

,

,

2 1 2 1 2 1 2

1

k

k

k

k

.

...

...

...

...

0 1 1 1

1 1

2

0 1 1 1

1 1

1

  

  

 

 

n n

n n

k

k

Then the number of zeros of P(z) in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not exceed

0 1

log

log

1

a

M

c

, where

]

)

(

)

(

[

1 2

0 1

1

n n n

n n

n n n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

M

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

0

]

R

[

2

(

0

0

)

0

]

for

R

1

and

]

)

(

)

(

[

1 2

0 1

1

n n n

n n

n n n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

M

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

2

(

0

0

)

0

0

]

for

R

1

.

Remark 1: Taking R=1and

1

,

0

1

c

, Theorem 1 reduces to Theorem A.

For different values of

k

1

,

k

2

,

1

,

2, Theorem 1 gives many other interesting results.

Theorem 2: Let Let

0

)

(

j j j

z

a

z

P

be a polynomial o f degree n such that

Re(

a

j

)

j,

Im(

a

j

)

j

and for some positive integers

,

,

,

and for some real numbers

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

,

1

0

;

,

,

,

;

,

,

,

k

k

k

k

k

k

k

(3)

1

0

,

1

0

3

4

,

.

.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

1 4 3 1

2 1 2 1

] 2 [ 2 2

0 3 2 2

2 2 ]

2 [ 2 3

1 2 3 1

2 1 2 1

] 2 [ 2 2

0 1 2 2

2 2 ]

2 [ 2 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

n n n n

k

k

k

k

Then, for even n, the number of zeros of P(z) in in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not exceed

0 2

log

log

1

a

M

c

,

where

]

)

(

)

(

[

1 2

0 1

2

n n n

n n

n n n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

M

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

0

]

R

[

2

(

0

0

)

0

]

for

R

1

and

]

)

(

)

(

[

1 2

0 1

2

n n n

n n

n n n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

M

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

2

(

0

0

)

0

0

]

for

R

1

.

If n is odd, the number of zeros of P(z) in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not exceed

0 2

log

log

1

a

M

c

, where

2

M

is same as

M

2except that

k

1

,

k

2

,

k

3

,

k

4 are respectively replaced by

k

2

,

k

1

,

k

4

,

k

3. For different values of

k

1

,

k

2

,

1

,

2, Theorem 2 gives many interesting results.

Theorem 3: Let Let

0

)

(

j j j

z

a

z

P

be a polynomial o f degree n such that for some positive integers

,

,

and for some real numbers

k

1

,

k

2

,

1

,

2

,

0

k

1

1

,

0

k

2

1

,

0

1

1

,

0

2

1

,

.

...

...

...

...

1 2 3 1

2 1 2 1

] 2 [ 2 2

0 1 2 2

2 2 ]

2 [ 2 1

a

a

a

a

a

k

a

a

a

a

a

k

n n

 

 

 

Then for even n the number of zeros of P(z) in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not exceed

0 3

log

log

1

a

M

c

,

where for

R

1

,

M

3

a

n

R

n2

a

n1

R

n1

a

0

R

n

[

a

1

(

1

k

1

)

a

n

(

1

k

2

)

a

n1

)]

2

(

sin

)

2

2

(

cos

2 2 0

1 1 2 1 2 1

0 1 1 2 1 2 1

2 2

  

n

j j n

n

n n

a

a

a

a

k

a

k

a

a

a

k

a

k

a

a

 

and for

R

1

,

(4)

)].

2

(

sin

)

2

2

(

cos

2 2 0

1 1 2 1 2 1

0 1 1 2 1 2 1

2 2

  

n

j j n

n

n n

a

a

a

a

k

a

k

a

a

a

k

a

k

a

a

If n is odd, then the number of zeros of P(z) in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not exceed

0 4

log

log

1

a

M

c

,

where

M

4 is same as

M

3 except that

k

1

,

k

2are respectively replaced by

k

2

,

k

1. For different values of

k

1

,

k

2, Theorem 3 gives many interesting results.

II.

LEMMAS

For the proofs of the above results we need the following results:

Lemma 1: If f(z) is analytic in

z

R

,but not identically zero, f(0)

0 and

f

(

a

k

)

0

,

k

1

,

2

,...,

n

, then

n

j j

i

a

R

f

d

f

1 2

0

log

(Re

log

(

0

)

log

2

1

Lemma 1 is the famous Jensen’s theorem (see page 208 of [1]).

Lemma 2: If f(z) is analytic and

f

(

z

)

M

(

r

)

in

z

r

, then the number of zeros of f(z) in

,

c

1

c

r

z

does not exceed

)

0

(

)

(

log

log

1

f

r

M

c

.

Lemma 2 is a simple deduction from Lemma 1.

Lemma 3: Let

0

)

(

j j j

z

a

z

P

be a polynomial o f degree n with complex coefficients such that for some

real

,

,

,

0

,

2

arg

a

j

j

n

and

,

0

,

1

j

n

a

a

j

j

then for any t>0,

ta

j

a

j1

(

t

a

j

a

j1

)

cos

(

t

a

j

a

j1

)

sin

. Lemma 3 is due to Govil and Rahman [2].

III.

PROOFS OF THEOREMS

Proof of Theorem 1: Consider the polynomial

F

(

z

)

(

1

z

)

P

(

z

)

1 2 1 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

1

0 1 1

1

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

...

)(

1

(

   

 

 

n n n n n n n

n n

n

n n n n

n

n n n n

z

z

k

z

k

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

z

a

z

a

z

}

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

{

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

0 2

0 2 1 1

1 1

1 2 1 1

2 2

0 1

0 1 1 1

1 1

z

z

z

z

z

z

k

z

k

i

z

z

z

z

n n n n n n n

n

   

 

   

 

 

   

 

For

z

R

, we have by using the hypothesis

...

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

1

0

1

1

1

n2

n1 n1

n n n

n n n

n

R

a

k

R

k

R

R

a

z

(5)

R

R

R

R

R

R

k

R

k

R

R

R

R

n n n

n n n

n n

0 2 0

2 1 1

1 1

1 1 2 2

1 2

0 1 0

1 1 1

1 1

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

   

 

   

 

 

  

 

For

R

1

,

...

)

1

[(

)

(

1

0

1 n

n1

1 n

n2

n1

n

n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

z

F

]

)

1

(

...

[

]

)

1

(

...

[

]

...

)

1

(

0 2 0

2 1

2 1

1 0

1 2

0 1 1

2 1

1 1

1 2

1 2 2

1 2

1 1

2

  

 

     

  

   

  

   

 

  

 

R

R

k

k

n n n n n

1

0

[

n

n

1

(

n

n

)

2

(

n

n

)

]

n

n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

0

]

R

[

2

(

0

0

)

0

]

For

R

1

,

]

)

(

)

(

[

)

(

z

a

n

R

n1

a

0

R

n

n

n

k

1

n

n

k

2

n

n

F

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

2

(

0

0

)

0

0

]

.

Hence by Lemma 2, the number of zeros of F(z) and therefore P(z) in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not exceed

0 1

log

log

1

a

M

c

, where

]

)

(

)

(

[

1 2

0 1

1

n n n

n n

n n n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

M

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

0

]

R

[

2

(

0

0

)

0

]

for

R

1

and

]

)

(

)

(

[

1 2

0 1

1

n n n

n n

n n n

n

R

a

R

k

k

a

M

R

[

1

(

0

0

)

2

(

0

0

)

0

0

]

for

R

1

. That proves Theorem 1.

Proof of Theorem 2: Let n be even.Consider the polynomial

F

(

z

)

(

1

z

2

)

P

(

z

)

(

1

z

2

)(

a

n

z

n

a

n1

z

n1

...

a

1

z

a

0

)

az

2

a

1

z

1

(

a

a

2

)

z

(

a

n 1

a

n 3

)

z

n 1

...

(

a

3

a

1

)

z

3 n

n n n

n

n

  

  

(

a

2

a

0

)

z

2

a

1

z

a

0

2

1 1

(

1

1

)

(

1 n

n2

)

n

(

2

1

)

n1

n n n

n n

n

z

a

z

k

z

k

z

k

z

a

.

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

{

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

(

2 0 0 3 2 0 3 2 3 1 1 4 3 1 4 3

3 5 3 2

4 2

1 3 1 4

1 1 4

2 3

3 0

1

2 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 3

3 5 3 2

4 2 1

3 1 2

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

k

z

k

z

k

z

k

i

a

z

a

z

z

z

z

z

z

z

k

n n n n

n n n

n n

n n n

n n n

n

n n n n

n n

n n n

   

  

 

  

   

 

  

For

z

R

, we have by using the hypothesis

1 1 2 1

2 1

1 1 2

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

 

nn

n n n

n n n

n n

n

R

a

R

k

R

k

R

k

R

a

z

(6)

3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 2 2 4 1 1 2 3

)

1

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

(

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

k

n n n n n n n n

n

           

                      

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

R

R

R

k

R

k

a

R

a

R

R

n n n n n    

2 0 3 2 0 3 2 3 1 4 3 1 4 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

...

R

R

R

R

R

R

     

     

For

R

1

,

1 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 2

)

1

(

)

1

[(

)

(

 

n

n

n

n

n n

n n

n

R

a

R

a

R

k

k

k

a

z

F

]

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

...

...

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

...

...

...

1 0 3 0 3 2 1 4 1 4 3 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 5 2 4 1 2 3

a

k

k

a

k

n n n n n n n n n

                  

               

2

1 1

0

[

n

n

n1

n1 n

n n n

n

R

a

R

a

R

a

].

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

2

1 0 4 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 2

a

k

k

k

k

n n n n

   

For

R

1

,

1 1 0 1 1 2

[

)

(

z

a

n

R

n

a

n

R

n

a

R

n

n

n

n

F

].

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

2

1 0 4 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 2

a

k

k

k

k

n n n n

   

Hence , by Lemma 2, the number of zeros of F(z) and therefore P(z) in

(

R

0

,

c

1

)

c

R

z

does not

exceed 0 2

log

log

1

a

M

c

, where for

R

1

,

1 1 0 1 1 2

2

[

 

 

n n n n n n

n n

n

R

a

R

a

R

a

M

2

(

2

21

2

21

)

(

k

1

n

k

3

n

)

],

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

1 0 4 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2

a

k

k

n n

and for

R

1

,

1 1 0 1 1 2

2

[

 

 

n n n n n

n n

n

R

a

R

a

R

a

(7)

].

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

2

1 0 4 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 1 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 2

a

k

k

k

k

n n n n

   

The proof for odd n is similar and is omitted. That proves Theorem 2.

Proof of Theorem 3: Suppose that n is even and the coefficient conditions hold i.e.

.

...

...

...

...

1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 1

a

a

a

a

a

k

a

a

a

a

a

k

n n

   

   

Consider the polynomial

)

...

)(

1

(

)

(

)

1

(

)

(

1 0

1 1 2 2

a

z

a

z

a

z

a

z

z

P

z

z

F

n n

n

n

az

n2

a

n1

z

n1

(

a

n

a

n2

)

z

n

(

a

n1

a

n3

)

z

n1

...

(

a

3

a

1

)

z

3

(

a

2

a

0

)

z

2

a

1

z

a

0

a

n

z

n2

a

n1

z

n1

(

k

1

1

)

a

n

z

n

(

k

1

a

n

a

n2

)

z

n

(

k

2

1

)

a

n

z

n1

0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 5 3 2 4 2 1 3 1 2

)

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

...

)

(

)

(

)

(

a

z

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

z

a

a

k

n n n n n n n n n

                 

           

For

z

R

, we have by using the hypothesis and Lemma 3

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2

)

1

(

)

1

(

)

(

 

nn

n n n n n n n n

n

R

a

R

k

a

R

a

k

a

R

k

a

R

a

z

F

0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 2 2 4 1 1 2 3

)

1

(

)

1

(

...

...

...

a

R

a

R

R

a

a

R

a

R

a

a

R

a

a

R

a

a

R

a

a

R

a

a

R

a

a

R

a

a

R

a

k

a

n n n n n n n n n

                 

           

2

1 1

0

[(

1

1

)

n

(

1

2

)

n1 n

n n n

n

R

a

R

a

R

k

a

k

a

a

]

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

)

1

(

)

1

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

...

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

...

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

...

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

sin

)

(

cos

)

(

1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 4 1 2 1 2

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

k

a

a

k

a

n n n n n n n n

                 

               

a

n

R

n2

a

n1

R

n1

a

0

R

n

[

a

1

(

1

k

1

)

a

n

(

1

k

2

)

a

n1

)]

2

(

sin

)

2

2

(

cos

2 2 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2

   

n j j n n n n

a

a

a

a

k

a

k

a

a

a

k

a

k

a

a

 

References

Related documents

Methods: A follow-up study 5.5 years after the explosion, 330 persons aged 18 – 67 years, compared lung function, lung function decline and airway symptoms among exposed

Product Name Technical Licences Technical Licenses Required/ Optional GIS 8.0 Required GIS_INTERACTIONSERVICE 8.0 Required ics_custom_media_channel 8.0

Twenty-five percent of our respondents listed unilateral hearing loss as an indication for BAHA im- plantation, and only 17% routinely offered this treatment to children with

From the perspective of organizational capital, this research shows that different components in organizational capital affect firm performance in different ways, specifically,

To simulate a real cloud environment and obtain accur- ate results, 7 virtual machines were deployed (1 cloud VM server, 3 VM cloudlets and 3 VM clients) over a public network among

The anti- oxidant activity was performed by DPPH free radical scavenging method using ascorbic acid as standard and compound IIa, IIc and IId showed significant free

Compared with traditional UWB BPF using hybrid structures, the proposed filter has a more sharp selectivity due to a transmission zero located at the lower edge of the passband

Yet the issue has been complete ^stence confusion; because the nature of spirit is and not, like that of matter, to be a principle of occasions· existence and