• No results found

counterfort-17m

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "counterfort-17m"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

P

Prro

ojje

ec

ctt

::

T

Tiittlle

e

:: D

De

es

siig

gn

n o

of

f C

Co

ou

un

ntte

errffo

orrt

t T

Ty

yp

pe

e rre

etta

aiin

niin

ng

gs

s w

wa

alllls

s

R

Re

ev

viis

siio

on

n

: R

: R0

0

D

Da

atte

e

: 03

: 0

3..1

12

2..2

20

01

15

5

Design report for Counterfort type retaining walls for approaches of bridges/ROB

Design report for Counterfort type retaining walls for approaches of bridges/ROB

(2)

Revision

Introduction

Height

above

GL

17 m

Depth of foundation

2 m

The net safe bearing capacity considered for the design is 33t/sq.m.

Material Properties

Grade of concrete

M25

Grade

of

Steel

Fe

500

Cover to Reinforcement

Foundations

75 mm

Walls

50mm

Counter

forts

40mm

Friction coefficient considered for design

0.5

This document pertains to the design of

c o unt er for t t y p e r et ai n i ng w a l l s fo r a ppo ac h es of br i dg es

fo r f ol l ow i ng h ei g hts  

(3)
(4)

Revision

Basic Input Remarks

Height of wall above Ground level 17 m

Depth of foundation 2 m ( FNL of abutment) Concret M25

Total height of retaining wall , H 19 m (RCC)

19.00

Top width of wall wt 500 mm Steel Fe500

bottom width of wall wb 500 mm Q 0.981

thickness of footing at edge t1 600 mm J 0.914

t2 0 mm sst 240

Width of toe slab tw 4.5 m

width of heel slab hw 9.00 m

Total width of foundation  4.5+9.00+ 500/1000 14 m

Clear spacing counterforts

3 m

width of counterfort 500

mm

c/c spacing of counterforts 3.00 m

 Average depth of soil fill over toe slab 0 m

 Average depth of soil fill over heel slab 19.00-0.60 1 8. 4 m

 Angle of Internal friction of Back fill material f 30.00 deg.

Equivalent height for LL surcharge pressure 1.2 m

Unit weight of back fill material 2 t/cum

Grade of concrete M25

Unit weight of concrete 2.5 t/cum

(5)

Design Code RE-001

Design of retaining wall (counter fort type) _Case-I Date

Revision Project: Subject 0.5 7 17 8 Df= 2 9 0 1 0.6

Earth press surcharge pressure

4.5 9

Kah calculation (ie horizontal c omponenet of active earth pressure)

angle of inclination of wall with horizontal a 90.00 deg 1.57 rad

angle of inclination of top surface of soil - horz b 0.00 deg 0.00

0.5 1 5

(6)

Revision

angle of wall friction d 20.00 deg 0.35 rad

Kh 0.280

Kv 0.102

Clear cover to reinforcement (walls) 50 mm

  f ootings 75 mm

Check for stability (under Normal case)

S.No Load(t) Mom(t.m)

1 Self weight of structure

I Footing 1 21  14/2 7 147.000 2 0.000  4.5+(0.5* 500/1000) 4.75 0.000 3 0.000  14-0.66*9.00 8.06 0.000 4 0.000 0.66* 4.5 2.97 0.000 II wall 0.000 5 23.00  4.5+0.5* 500/1000 4.75 109.250 6 0.00  4.5+( 500/1000)+(0.33*( 500- 500)/1000) 5 0.000 2 Soil over   wall (7) 0.00  4.5+( 500/1000)+(0.66*( 500- 500)/1000) 5 0.000 heel (8) 331.20  14-0.5*9.00 9.5 3146.400 toe (9) 0.00 0.5* 4.5 2.25 0.000 0.5*(9.00)*(19.00- 19)* 2 0.00 0.666*9.00+ 500/1000+ 4.5 10.994 0.000 36.76  4.5+( 500/1000+0.5*( 500- 500)/1000) 5.00 183.778 3586.428 Horzontal loads 0.5*0.280* 2*19.00^2 101.041 0..42*19.00 7.98 806.307 LLsurcharge 1.2*2*0.280*19 12.763 9.5 121.249 113.804 927.556 t.m

Item description Lever arm wrt toe

 14* 600/1000* 2.5  500/1000*( 0)/1000* 2.5

as per columb's theory

0.5*9.00* 0/1000* 2.5 0.5* 0* 4.5/1000* 2.5 ( 500/1000)*( 19-( 600/1000))* 2.5 0.5*( 19-( 600/1000))*( 500-500)/1000* 2.5 0.5*( 19-( 600/1000))*( 500-500)/1000* 2  18.4*9.00* 2  4.5* 0* 2

traingular component of earth fill over retaining wall(10) 5 Vertical component of

Backfill 0.5*0.102* 2*19.00^2

Stabilising moment

Horizontal component (active)

(7)

Design Code RE-001

Design of retaining wall (counter fort type) _Case-I Date

Revision Project:

Subject

Total Active Earth Pressure behind Retaining wall 113.80

m

F.S against Overturning (S M / S Mo ) ROUNDUP(3586.428/927.556,1) 3.90 >2.0 Hence ok

F.S against sliding ( S V * m / S H) (411.96*0.5)/113.80 1.81 >1.5 Hence ok

X' (3586.428-927.556)/411.96 6.454 m b/6 =

B/2-x'  14/2-6.454 0.546 m 2.33

Pmax (P1) 411.96/ 14*(1+6*0.546/ 14) 36.31 t/sq.m

Net SBC at founding level 36.31- 2* 2 32.31 t/sq.m

Pmin (P2) 411.96/ 14*(1-6*0.546/ 14) 22.543 t/sq.m

Design of foundation: Design of Toe slab:

Earth pressure from bottom at tip, p1 36.31 36.31 t/sq.m

Earth pressure at face of wall, P3 22.543+(( 14- 4.5)/ 14*(36.31-22.543)) 31.88 t/sq.m

 Average pressure (36.31+31.88)/2 34.10 t/sq.m

Soil + self weight form top ( 600+ 0+ 600)/2000* 2.5+( 2-( 600+ 0+ 600)/2000)* 2 4.3 t/sq.m

NetPressurintensity 34.10-4.3 29.80 t/sq.m

(8)

Revision y

1.50 1.50

x 4.5

4.30 Load from top

31.88 Max. pr distr.

36.31

32.01 27.58 Net . Pr. Dist

27.58 UDL Net Avg. Pr dist

Traingular 

4.42

a/b = 0.32

Moment Coefficients for UD L UDL Train'ler  

(slab fixing along three edges , ) Mx +ve 0.034 0.016

Mx-ve 0.018 0.008

My +ve 0.021 0.015

My-ve 0.006 0.005

Rectr distribution Traingular distribution

Moments Mx +ve 0.034*27.58*(4.5)^2+0.016*4.42*(4.5)^2 20.56 t.m

Mx -ve 0.018*27.58*(4.5)^2+0.008*4.42*(4.5)^2 10.64 t.m

My +ve 0.021*27.58*(4.5)^2+0.015*4.42*(4.5)^2 13.13 t.m

My -ve 0.006*27.58*(4.5)^2+0.005*4.42*(4.5)^2 3.69 t.m

Min depth as per balanced section SQRT(20.56*10000000/(1000*0.982)) 457.6 mm > 517

(9)

Design Code RE-001

Design of retaining wall (counter fort type) _Case-I Date

Revision Project:

Subject

Steel Astx+ve (20.56*10000000/(240*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 1812.88 sq.mm top

 Ast x - ve (10.64*10000000/(240*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 938.30 sq.mm bot

 Ast y +ve (13.13*10000000/(240*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 1158.02 sq.mm top

 Ast y - ve (3.69*10000000/(240*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 325.16 sq.mm bot

min Ast (0.0012*1000*( 600+ 0)) 720.00 sq.mm

Check for Shear 

UDL Tr ' ler  

Max reaction 0.166*27.58*4.5+0.01*4.42*4.5 21 t at deff 

Tv 0.4024 N/sq.mm

Tc for pt = 0.49 0.3800 N/sq.mm

Vus/d 0.2240 kN/cm per meter 

Provide shear links Provide Y8 shear links

Provide  Y20-125 (bot) x-dir 

Provide  Y16-150 (top) x-dir 

Provide  Y16-125 (bot) Y-dir 

Provide  Y12-150 (top) Y-dir 

Design of heel slab :

Earthpressurefrombottomattip 22.54 t/sq.m

Earth pressure at face of wall 22.543+((9.00)/ 14*(36.31-22.543)) 31.39 t/sq.m

 Average pressure (22.54+31.39)/2 26.97 t/sq.m

Soil + self weight form top ( 600+ 0+ 600)/2000* 2.5+( 19-(( 600+ 0+ 600)/1000)*0.5)*1.8 34.62 t/sq.m

Net Pressur intensity -34.62+26.97 -7.65 t/sq.m

Y

1.50

1.50

X 9.0

(10)

Revision

34.62 Load from top

22.54 Max. pr distr. 31.39

-12.08 -3.23

Net . Pr. Dist

-3.23 UDL NetAvg.Prdist

Traingular  -8.85

a/b = 0.16

Moment Coefficients for UD L UDL Train'ler 

(slab fixing along three edges , ) Mx +ve 0.009 0.008

Mx-ve 0.005 0.004 My +ve 0.006 0.007 My-ve 0.001 0.002 Moments Mx +ve 0.009*-3.23*(9.00)^2+0.008*-8.85*(9.00)^2 -7.76 t.m Mx -ve 0.005*-3.23*(9.00)^2+0.004*-8.85*(9.00)^2 -3.97 t.m My +ve 0.006*-3.23*(9.00)^2+0.007*-8.85*(9.00)^2 -6.44 t.m My -ve 0.001*-3.23*(9.00)^2+0.002*-8.85*(9.00)^2 -1.65 t.m

Min depth as per balanced section SQRT(ABS(-7.76)*10000000/(1000*0.982)) 281.1 mm > 517

Steel Astx+ve (ABS(-7.76)*10000000/(230*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 714.14 sq.mm top

 Ast x - ve (ABS(-3.97)*10000000/(230*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 364.88 sq.mm bot

As per Engineering Monograph no 27

(11)

Design Code RE-001

Design of retaining wall (counter fort type) _Case-I Date

Revision Project:

Subject

 Ast y +ve (ABS(-6.44)*10000000/(230*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 592.48 sq.mm top

 Ast y - ve (ABS(-1.65)*10000000/(230*0.914*(( 600+ 0)- 75-8))) 151.79 sq.mm bot

min Ast (0.0012*1000*( 600+ 0)) 720.00 sq.mm

Check for Shear 

UDL Tr ' ler  

Max reaction 0.32*-3.23*9.0+0.0189*-8.85*9.0 -11

Tv -0.2089 N/sq.mm

Tc for pt = 0.26 0.2650 N/sq.mm

Vus/d -4.7395 kN/cm per meter 

Provide shear links No shear is required

Provide  Y16-150 (top) x-dir 

Provide  Y12-100 (bot) x-dir 

Provide  Y16-150 (top) Y-dir 

Provide  Y10-125 (bot) Y-dir 

Wall design :

Height of wall  19-( 0+ 600)/1000 18.40 m

Earth pressure (18.40* 2*0.280) 10.300 t/sq.m

Due to LL surcharge ( 2* 1.2*0.280) 0.672 t/sq.m

(12)

Revision Y 1.50 1.50 a= 1.500 b = 18.40 a/b = 0.082 18.40   X 0.672 10.300 t/sq.m

3 .0 0 m UDL(LL) D'ler(Earth Pressure) Dist.

Moment Coefficients for UDL and Trainguler  UDL(LL) D'ler(EP)

(slab fixing along three edges , ) Mx +ve 0.0052 0.0036

Mx-ve 0.0027 0.0019 My +ve 0.0033 0.0030 My-ve 0.0007 0.0005 Moments Mx +ve 0.0052*0.67*(18.40)^2 + 0.0036*10.30*(18.40)^2 13.74 t.m Mx -ve 0.0027*0.67*(18.40)^2 + 0.0019*10.30*(18.40)^2 7.24 t.m My +ve 0.0033*0.67*(18.40)^2 + 0.0030*10.30*(18.40)^2 11.21 t.m My -ve 0.0007*0.67*(18.40)^2 + 0.0005*10.30*(18.40)^2 1.90 t.m

Min depth as per balanced section SQRT(13.74*10000000/(1000*0.914)) 380.3 mm < 417

Steel Astx+ve (13.74*10000000/(230*0.904*((2.00-0.10-8))) 1501.7 sq.mm

 Ast x - ve (7.24*10000000/(230*0.904*((2.00-0.10-8))) 791.5 sq.mm

 Ast y +ve (11.21*10000000/(230*0.904*((2.00-0.10-8))) 1225.7 sq.mm

 Ast y - ve (1.90*10000000/(230*0.904*((2.00-0.10-8))) 208.0 sq.mm

min Ast 0.0012*1000*2.0 750.00 sq.mm

As per Engineering Monograph no 27

(13)

Design Code RE-001

Design of retaining wall (counter fort type) _Case-I Date

Revision Project:

Subject

Provide  Y16-125 Earth face x-dir 

Provide  Y12-100 away from E/F x-dir 

Provide  Y16-125 Earth face y-dir 

Provide  Y10-150 away from E/F y-dir 

Counter fort Design on Heel side

Size at bottom 500.0*9,500.0

Maximum BM in One counterfort

1913.98 t.m

Depth required for balanced section 6246.7 mm

Provided 9500 mm  Ast rerquired 9362.9 Provide 14-Y32 9648 Shear force 321.4 t . tv 0.7 N/sq.mm % of steel Pt 0.203 % Shear strength tc 0.250 < tv Vus/d 2.163

Hence Provide Y10-2L-150as Shear reinforcement

0.5*(0.280* 2*( 19- 600*0.001)*3.00*0.3333*( 19- 600*0.001)^2+ 1.2* 2*0.280*3.00*0.5*( 19- 600*0.001)^2) SQRT(1913.98*10000000/( 500* .981)) 1913.98*10000000/(0.914*240*(9500-91-90)) (0.5*0.280* 2*( 19- 600*0.001)^2*3.00+ 1.2* 2*0.280*3.00*( 19- 600*0.001)) 321.4*10000/( 500*(9500-85)) Sheet no:

(14)

Revision Curtailment

Counter fort Design on Heel side

Size at section where the reinf curtailed ( 500.0*6,365.0

Maximum BM in One counterfort

600.92 t.m

Depth required for balanced section 3500.2 mm

Provided 6365 mm  Ast rerquired 4366.3 Provide 6-Y32 4824 Shear force 280.1 t . tv 0.9 N/sq.mm Pt 0.152 % Shear strength tc 0.230 < tv Vus/d 3.310 kn/cm

Hence Provide Y10-2L-150 as Shear reinforcement Counter fort Design on Heel side

Size at section where the reinf curtailed 500.0*3,163.5

Maximum BM in One counterfort

83.29 t.m

Depth required for balanced section 1303.1 mm

Provided 3164 mm  Ast rerquired 1235.8 Provide 4-Y32 3216 0.5*(0.280* 2*( 19- 600*0.001)*0.67*3.00*0.3333*(( 19- 600*0.001)*0.67)^2+ 1.2* 2*0.280*3.00*0.5*(( 19- 600*0.001)*0.67)^2) SQRT(600.92*10000000/( 500* .981)) 600.92*10000000/(0.914*240*(6365-91)) (0.280* 2*(( 600*0.001)*0.67)^2*3.00+ 1.2* 2*0.280*3.00*( 19-600*0.001)*0.67) 280.1*10000/( 500*(6365-85)) 0.5*(0.280* 2*( 19- 600*0.001)*0.333*3.00*0.3333*(( 19- 600*0.001)*0.333)^2+ 1.2* 2*0.280*3.00*0.5*(( 19- 600*0.001)*0.333)^2) SQRT(83.29*10000000/( 500* .981)) 83.29*10000000/(0.914*240*(3164-91))

(15)

Design Code RE-001

Design of retaining wall (counter fort type) _Case-I Date

Revision Project: Subject Shear force 75.4 t . tv 0.5 N/sq.mm Pt 0.203 % Shear strength tc 0.230 < tv Vus/d 1.299 kn/cm

Hence Provide Y10-2L-125 as Shear reinforcement Counter fort Design on TOE side

Size at bottom 500.0*3,500.0

 AVG Base pressure at bottom on toe side 34.095 t/sq.m

NetPressuratbottom 29.795 t/sq.m

Maximum BM in One counterfort ( spaced at 3.0m c/c) 905.04 t.m =

Depthrequiredforbalancedsection 4295.50 mm

Provide 3500 mm  Ast rerquired 12102.69 sq.mm Provide 8-Y32 Shearforce 95.77 t Shear stress tv 0.56 N/sq.mm Pt 0.69 % Shear strength tc 0.23 N/sq.mm Vus/d 1.654 kn/cm

Hence Provide Y10-2L-150 as Shear reinforcement (0.280* 2*(( 600*0.001)*0.333)^2*3.00+ 1.2* 2*0.280*3.00*( 19-600*0.001)*0.333) 75.4*10000/( 500*(3164-85)) 29.795*3*4.5^2/2 SQRT(905.04*10000000/( 500* .981)) 905.04*10000000/(0.914*240*(3500-91)) 29.795* 4.5*2.5/3.5 95.77*10000/( 500*(3500-85)) Sheet no:

References

Related documents

Interestingly, this novel in vitro affinity maturation method also resembles the natural strategy of the immune system of nurse sharks [109] to select clones from a primary

(2003), Organizational Downsizing: The Effects Of Downsizing Activities on The Survivors (in Turkish), Master Thesis of Science, Social Science Institute,

AUDI AG does not guarantee or accept any liability with respect to the correctness of information in this

In reserve troncal (1) a descendant inherited or acquired by gratuitous title property from an ascendant or from a brother or sister; (2) the same property is

Nel, 'Technological utopia, dystopia and ambivalence: Teaching with social media at a South African university' (2015) 46 British Journal of Educational Technology 629 at

Battery Microcontroller solar panel system computer, and data logger 80 Basic electrical engineering, Visual C# programming, and Embedded C programming SMS system. (ii)

To achieve tNGs with these requirements, we fine tuned their size and VPTT by varying the synthetic parameters like sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) feed, dPG-Ac feed, monomer ratio,