Biochemical and clinical implications of
proinsulin conversion intermediates.
B D Given, … , A H Rubenstein, H S Tager
J Clin Invest.
1985;76(4):1398-1405. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112116.
Since a complete map of insulin-related peptides in humans requires consideration of
proinsulin, Arg32/Glu33-split proinsulin, Arg65/Gly66-split proinsulin,
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin, des-Lys64, Arg65-des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin, and insulin, we applied high performance liquid
chromatography coupled with radioimmunoassay to investigate the formation of proinsulin
conversion intermediates in vitro and in vivo. Kinetic analysis of proinsulin processing by a
mixture of trypsin and carboxypeptidase B (to stimulate in vivo processes) revealed (a) a
rapid decline in proinsulin concommitant with formation of conversion intermediates, (b)
formation of des-Arg31, Arg32-proinsulin and des-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin in the ratio 3.3:1
at steady state, and (c) complete conversion of the precursor to insulin during extended
incubation. Studies on normal human pancreas identified a similar ratio of
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin to des-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin (approximately 3:1), whereas two
insulinomas contained sizable amounts of des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin, but barely
detectable amounts of des-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin. None of the tissues contained
measurable quantities of Arg32/Glu33- or Arg65/Gly66-split proinsulin. Analysis of plasma
from three diabetic subjects managed by the intravenous infusion of human proinsulin
revealed less than 1% processing of the circulating precursor to conversion intermediates
and no processing of the precursor to human insulin. Nevertheless, analysis of plasma from
the same subjects managed by the subcutaneous infusion of proinsulin revealed 4-11%
processing of the precursor to intermediates that had the properties of
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin and Arg65/Gly66-split des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin. We conclude that (a) processing of des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin to
insulin in […]
Research Article
Find the latest version:
Biochemical and
Clinical
Implications
of
Proinsulin
Conversion
Intermediates
B. D.Given, R. M.Cohen, S. E.Shoelson,B. H.Frank,A. H.Rubenstein, and H.S.
Tager
Departmentsof Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology,
andMedicine,
The Universityof Chicago,
Chicago,
Illinois 60637; andLilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana46285Abstract
Since a complete map of insulin-related
peptides
in humans re-quires consideration of proinsulin,Arg32/Glu33-split
proinsulin,Arg'5/Gly"-split
proinsulin,
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin,
des-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin,
andinsulin,
weapplied
high performance
liquid chromatography coupled with
radioimmunoassay
to in-vestigate the formation of proinsulin conversionintermediates invitro and invivo. Kinetic analysis of proinsulin
processing
by amixture of
trypsin
andcarboxypeptidase
B(to simulate
invivo
processes) revealed (a) a
rapid
decline inproinsulin
concommitant with formation of conversion intermediates, (b)formation ofdes-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
anddes-Lys",Arge5-proinsulin
in theratio
3.3:1 at steady state, and(c) complete
conversion
of the precursor toinsulinduring
extendedincubation. Studies
onnormal human pancreasidentified
asimilarratio
ofdes-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin
to
des-Lys".,ArgA5-proinsulin
(-3:1),
whereas twoinsulinomas
contained sizable
amounts ofdes-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin,
butbarely
detectable amountsof
des-Lys64,Arg'5-proinsulin.
None of thetissues contained
measurable quantities
ofArg32/Glu33-or
Arg'5/Gly"-split
proinsulin. Analysis of plasma
from threediabetic
subjects
managed by theintravenous infusion of
human proinsulin revealed <1%processing
of thecirculating
precursor toconversion intermediates
and noprocessing
ofthe precursor tohuman insulin.Nevertheless,
analysis of plasma
from the samesubjects
managed by the subcutaneous infusionof proinsulin
re-vealed 4-11%processingof
the precursor tointermediates
that had theproperties of
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
andArge5/Gly"-split proinsulin.
We conclude that(a) processing of
proinsulin
to
insulin
invivo
as invitro
likely
occursby
preferential cleavage
atthe
Arg32-Glu33
peptide
bond inproinsulin,
(b)
proinsulin
isinefficiently
processed in the vascularcompartment,
and(c)
sub-cutaneousadministration of
the
precursor can result in thefor-mation
ofconversion
intermediates
with thepotential for
con-tributing
tobiological activity.
Introduction
Although
thebiosynthesis
of insulin via limited
proteolytic
cleavage of
proinsulin
(the
single-chain
hormoneprecursor)
has beenrecognized
for almost 20 yr(1-3),
manydetails of
thecon-version process and of the physiological significance
of
thecir-culating
precursorremain
tobeclarified.
Asillustrated by
theAddresscorrespondencetoHoward S.Tager, Departmentof Biochem-istry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, 920East58th Street,Chicago, IL60637.
Receivedforpublication 5 March 1985 and in revised form IJuly 1985.
tentative scheme
ofFig.
1, conversion ofproinsulin
to insulinis
thought to occurby
abranched pathwayinvolving (a)
the action ofenzymes with specificities similar to those of trypsin andcarboxypeptidase
B and(b)
the formation of conversionintermediates
that include in humansArg65/Gly66-split
proin-sulin, Arg32/Glu33-split proinproin-sulin,
des-Lys,64Arg65-proinsulin,
and des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin (4-5). Theanalogous
des-dipep-tideproinsulin intermediates have been identified by analysis of
prpinsulin-containing
fractions produced during the commercialmanufacture of
bovine
andporcine insulin
(4,6),
bybiosynthetic
experiments
involving
the use of isolated pancreatic islets (7), andby
in vitro studiesinvolving
the use ofcommercially
avail-able enzymes(8).
Relatedforms, along
withproinsulin,
have beendetected
inlarge
scalepreparations
ofhuman
insulin(9),
in human insulinomas incubated with
radiolabeled
amino acids (1), and in human serum(10-14). Abnormal intermediates
ofconversion
have also beenidentified
in twofamilies with
insulin genemutations
andwith familialhyperproinsulinemia (15-17).
Still,
thecomplexity
of the scheme for thebiosynthetic
conver-sion
of
proinsulin
toinsulin
(acomplexity
particularly
acute in the rat, whereexpression
oftwononallelic insulin genes resultsin
adoubling of
thenumber
of intermediate forms [18]),
the numberof
different endopeptidases suggested
toplay
potential
roles in the
conversion
process(including glandular kallikrein,
cathepsin B,
trypsin, kininogenase, plasminogen activator,
and
their
relatedforms [
19-23]),
andthelack
ofboth
sensitive anddiscriminating
methodstoanalyze
the lowamountsofproinsulin
and conversion intermediates
available forstudy,
have
hinderedinvestigation
in the area.Therecent
availability
of
biosynthetic
human
proinsulin
for
biological
andbiochemical
study has led torenewed interest in theclinical importance
of the hormone precursor (24-26). A numberof investigators
have now developed specificradioim-munoassays
for
human proinsulin (27-30),studied the in vitro and invivo
biological activities of
thehormone precursor (24-26, 31, 32), and considered theefficacy
ofproinsulin inmanaging
diabetic patients (26).
Such usesofproinsulin,
however,require
consideration of proinsulin
metabolism andthe potential
for-mation
and measurementof
conversionintermediates.
We havetherefore developed
acombined
approach tothe identification ofintermediates of
proinsulin conversion that involves bothiso-cratic, reverse-phase
high
performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC),'
andspecific radioimmunoassays
forinsulin,
C-peptide, andproinsulin. Application of
ourmethods to the study of en-zyme-catalyzed proinsulin conversion, to the determination ofintermediates
in normal pancreatic and insulinoma tissue, andto the
analysis of circulating forms resulting from proinsulin
infusion
in humans reveals that conversion of proinsulin toin-sulin,
in vivo as in vitro, likely occurs by preferential cleavageatthe
Arg32-Glu33
peptide
bond in the precursor and thatsub-cutaneous, butnot
intravenous,
infusion
ofproinsulin
results1.Abbreviations used in this paper: HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
J. Clin.Invest.
©TheAmerican Societyfor ClinicalInvestigation,Inc. 0021-9738/85/10/1398/08 $1.00
T
KR-A
R
proinsu in RK
65 _RR
Arg /Gly
6-split
proinsulinrT
RRdes-
Lys64,
Arg65-
proinsulinT
C
C-peptide
T
LKR
II
RR
Arg32/Glu33-split
proinsulinIc
LKR-T7
des-Arg3l Arg32-
proinsulinT
C
t7h
insulin
Figure
1.
Scheme for the processing of proinsulin to major conversion intermediates and to insulin. The A-chains and B-chains of insulin are illustrated by heavy lines, whereas the C-peptide is illustrated by a light line. (The length of the C-peptide is exaggerated in the projection used.) Paired dibasic amino acids at precursor conversion sites are shown explicitly and are identified by the one-letter amino acidcode(K, lysine;R, arginine). The numbering of amino acid residues as-sumes that the peptides are derived from humans; that is, that the C-peptide is 31 residues in length. The letters T and C identify reactions thought to be catalyzed bytrypsin-like and carboxypeptidase B-like enzymes, respectively. While processing of proinsulin to the
des-dipep-tide proinsulin intermediatesof conversion is shownin detail, process-ing of these intermediates to insulin is shown in an abbreviated way: cleavage of either intermediate by a trypsin-like endoprotease at the remaining paired dibasic amino acid conversion site, followed by the action of a carboxypeptidase B-like exoprotease to remove COOH-ter-minalbasic residues, would yieldinsulin plusC-peptide.in the appearance ofvariable,but significant, amounts of
proin-sulin conversion intermediates in the circulation.Methods
Enzymatic conversion of biosynthetic human proinsulin. Biosynthetic human proinsulin (0.75 mg; provided by Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN) was dissolved in0.75ml of Tris buffer (0.05 M Tris, 0.005 M
CaC12
brought to pH 7.5 withHG).
Tosylphenylalanine chlo-romethylketone-treated trypsin (0.9 Mg; Worthington Biochemical Corp., Freehold, NJ) and carboxypeptidase B (18 Mg; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) were added, and digestion was allowed to proceed at 220C; 15-Ml
aliquots of the reaction mixture were removed at 0.25, 1, 3, 5, 10, and 30min
and were added to15-Ml
portionsof glacial acetic acid to stop the reaction. The mixtures were then analyzed by HPLC (see below). The proinsulinconversion intermediatesdes-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
anddes-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin
were identified by amino acid analysis and bycomparison with authentic standards. In-termediates containing dibasic amino acid residues at conversion sites(Arg32/Glu33-split
proinsulin andArg65/Gly"-split
proinsulin) were gen-erated by incubating0.1
mg of biosynthetic human proinsulin with 0.12 Mg oftrypsinfor2min
at22°C
in0.1
ml of theTris buffer described above. The reaction was stopped by the addition of glacial acetic acid and the products were separated by HPLC. The intermediates were iden-tified by subsequent conversion to the des-dipeptide intermediates(throughdigestionwith carboxypeptidase B and HPLCanalysis) and by comparison with authentic standards.
Tissue extractions. Two humaninsulinomas and a specimenof nor-mal pancreas were obtained at laparotomy, with warmischemia times being < 15
min;
the tissues were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at -70'C. An additionalspecimen of pancreasfrom a transplant donor was obtained frozen on dry ice from The National Diabetes Research Interchange, Philadelphia, PA. Tissues were homogenized in acidified ethanol and soluble peptides were precipitated by the addition of ethanol anddiethyl ether, as described (33). In each case, the precipitated material was dissolved in 5 ml of 3 M acetic acid and the sample was gel-filtered on a column (2.5 X 90 cm) of Bio-Gel P-30 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) using the same solvent. Fractions containing 4 ml were collected; peaksof material corresponding to proinsulin and insulin were identified by subjecting aliquots of fractions toradioimmunoassay for insulin. The higher molecular weight peak of material (containing proin-sulin and intermediates of proinproin-sulin conversion) was pooled in each case,andaliquotsof these pooled fractions were analyzed by HPLCas described later.Proinsulininfusion andpurification of plasmacomponents. Plasma from three diabeticsubjects whoreceivedinfusionsofbiosynthetichuman proinsulin was obtainedfrom studies similartothosereported previously (26).Briefly, subjects receiving porkinsulin as partoftheir therapy were admitted to the ClinicalResearch Center andweretreatedwith subcu-taneous regular pork insulin to maintain euglycemia. Insulin therapy was terminated and intravenous humanproinsulin was thenadministered to maintain the blood glucose level. Subjects were placed on a basal intravenousinfusionof proinsulin for 24 h with bolusinjectionstocover meals,after which a 50-mlspecimen of bloodwascollected iniced tubes containingethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(1.25mg/ml)and aprotinin (417
U/ml;
Sigma Chemical Co., St.Louis, MO).Resultingproinsulin levelsin subjects Iand2 were 5.5 and 4.7pmol/ml,respectively;subject 3received a bolus injection30min before sampling, resultinginaproin-sulin levelof 22.5 pmol/ml.Subjectswerethenplacedonsubcutaneous
proinsulin infusion by use ofa subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (model 9100; Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.,St. Paul,MN)foranadditional 24-hperiod and a second 50-ml specimen ofbloodwasobtained; sub-cutaneousbolus injectionswere usedto covermeals. Proinsulinlevels resulting from subcutaneous infusion were 9.9, 8.0, and 9.9 pmol/ml for subjects 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Dosesof
proinsulin
administeredover the 24-h infusion periods were 9.7 and 10.2 mg for subject 1, 8.6 and 9.4 mg for subject 2, and 9.4 and 12.5 mgfor subject 3, for the intravenous and subcutaneous routes, respectively. Mean blood glucose levels (determined at 2-h intervals during the last 8hof proinsulin in-fusion) were 207 and 249mg/dl for subject 1, 130 and 108 mg/dl for subject 2, and222 and 141mg/dl for subject 3, again for the intravenous and subcutaneous routes of proinsulin administration, respectively. These studies received the approvalof the ClinicalInvestigation Committee of The University of Chicago.
Plasma was separated from blood specimensimmediately after col-lection and insulin immunoreactive material was purified by passage of the diluted plasma over columns of guinea pig anti-insulin antibodies bound to Sepharose as previously described (16, 34). Yields of insulin immunoreactive material exceeded 90%. Control studies involving the use of insulin and proinsulin, and previous studiesinvolving the use of abnormal intermediates of proinsulinconversion(16), showed that our antibody columns extract insulin, proinsulin, and proinsulin interme-diates equivalently. Additional studies showed thatproinsulin added to freshly collected blood from normal subjects and then processed as de-scribed above was not subject to proteolytic degradation nor to conversion to intermediates or insulin.
HPLC analysis and radioimmunoassays. Separation of insulin,
proinsulin, and proinsulin intermediates was performed by reverse-phase HPLC using a Series 4 liquid chromatograph, ISS-100automatic injector,
LC 85B spectrophotometric detector with autocontrol, and LCI 100 re-corder/integrator (all from Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT). Separa-tions occurred at 21 'C on an Ultraphere C-18 Ion-pair column (4.6 X 250 mm, 5 um particle size, Altex Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA).
Elutionbuffers contained an aqueous phase of 0.012 M triethylamine, 0.1 Mphosphoric acid, and 0.05 M NaCIO4 (HPLC-grade, Fisher
Sci-entific,Fair Lawn, NJ) adjusted to pH 3.0 with NaOH, and an organic phase of acetonitrile (HPLC-grade, Fisher Scientific Co., Pittsburgh, PA)
(35). Theflow rate wasI ml/min.
Elutionofsamples (injected in 3 M acetic acid containing 0.05-0.1 mgof bovine serum albumin when amounts of peptide were <1 jg) proceeded byaseries of three-stepped isocratic mixtures of the aqueous andorganicphases described above. For most studies, insulin was eluted
during30 minat31.0% acetonitrile; proinsulin conversion intermediates wereeluted during 40 min at 31.2% acetonitrile; proinsulin was eluted
during30 min at 32.5% acetonitrile. The column was then eluted by a
30-min,linear gradient to 55% acetonitrile to remove albumin and other
substances, and was equilibrated with the starting solution containing 31% acetonitrile for an additional 30 min. All isocratic solutions were
premixedtoensure reproducibility. For in vitro conversion studies and forcalibration, optical absorbance was recorded at 214 nm and peak areaswereintegratedelectronically. For analysis of plasma samples and
oflesser amountsofmaterial, 0.4-ml fractions of column effluent were collected in tubes containing a drop of borate buffer (0.5MH3BO3 and 10mg/ml of bovine serum albumin adjusted to pH 9.3 with NaOH). Theorganicsolvent was removed under vacuum and the contents of the tubeswerethenIyophilized. The residues were dissolved in l-ml
aliquotsof radioimmunoassay buffer (0.04 M sodium dihydrogen
phos-phate, 0.1 MNaCI, 0.6 mM ethylmercurithiosalicylic acid, and 6% bovine serumalbumin, allbrought to pH 7.4 by the addition of NaOH).
Ra-dioimmunoassays forinsulin (using antibodyGP-l),for human C-peptide
(using
antibodyM1230), andforhuman proinsulin (using antibody 18D) have beendescribed(30, 36, 37). Yields of immunoreactive insulin re-coveredfromtheHPLC column ranged from 70 to 90% of the materialapplied.
Previousstudies have shown that the insulin assay is relativelynondiscriminating forinsulin-containing peptides (16), that the C-peptide assayrequiresthefreeCOOH-terminus of the peptide for full reactivity
(36), and that theproinsulinassay depends on the Arg3t-Arg32linkage between theCOOH-terminus of the insulin Bchain and the NH2-ter-minus of the C-peptide for ligand recognition (30).
Results
Our
study of
proinsulin
processing
began with an examinationof
precursorconversion by
amixture
of trypsin andcarboxy-peptidase
B.Digestion
conditions (limiting
trypsin and excesscarboxypeptidase
B,
seeref.
8) were chosen to result indes-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin
anddes-Lys4,Arg65-proinsulin
asinter-mediates in the
conversion
and toyield insulin
as the product;analysis
of the
reaction mixture
byreverse-phase
HPLC wasdesigned
toprovide both separation of substrate,
intermediates,and
product,
andquantitation
of
eachof
these components.HPLC
profiles
of the reaction mixture described
under Methods,after selected
periods
of
digestion,
areshown in Fig.
2. Note that(a)
the
preparation
of biosynthetic
humanproinsulin
contained neither insulin norproinsulin
conversionintermediates,
(b) measurableamounts ofdes-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
anddes-Lys4,Arg65-proinsulin
weredetected afteronly
15 sofdigestion,(c)
theamountsof
theseconversion
intermediates first increased and then decreasedasproinsulin
wasconverted toinsulin,
and(d)
conversion
wasessentially
complete by
30min,
evenunder theseconditions
wherethe molarratio of
substrate toendopro-teaseexceeded
2,000:1
and theconcentration
oftrypsin
was0.5 nM.Notwithstanding
the small amount of desamido humaninsulin
detected at 36 minof
elution,
noevidence for degradation
of the
product
todesoctapeptide
insulin(insulin lacking
residues B23through B30)
or toothermaterial
wasnoted.Quantitative
analysis of the kinetics of proinsulin conversion (employing greater numbers of digestion periods) is provided in Fig. 3. As
S c
V
CY
c
0
a
m:I1
Insulin Intermediates Proinsulin
0 min 0.25 min
FJ\ I<
LJ4t.±
lF Tl
3
l
min
j 10min
~
i30
min
25 30 35 40 50 55 60 6585 90 95
Elution period, min
Figure 2. HPLC elution profiles of insulin, conversion intermediates, and proinsulin resulting from the incubation of human proinsulin with trypsin plus carboxypeptidase B. Recorder tracings measuring op-tical absorbance at 214 nm are shown for samples of proinsulin incu-bated with enzymes for the periods identified, as described in Meth-ods. The abcissa records the period required for elution of the peptides from the reverse-phase column and is truncated in two areas; no
ab-sorbing material appeared between 40 and 50minor between 65 and 85 min of elution. In each case, the height of theframecorresponds to 0.01 absorbance unit. The peak of insulin shown at 0.25minof
diges-tion corresponds to 2% of total absorbance. Peptides eluting in the left and right peaks in the area of the profile called "intermediates" were identified asdes-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin and
des-Lyse,Arge5-proinsulin,
respectively, by use ofstandards.illustratedby thefigure,theconcentrationof proinsulinisinitially
seen todrop rapidly(in synchronywiththeformation of con-version intermediates) with only minimalformationofinsulin.
At all periods of digestion, the concentrationof
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin exceeded that ofdes-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin, with the ratio ofthese two intermediate forms being -3:1 bothafter
short periods (when formation of insulin wasminimal) andat steady state(3-5
min
ofdigestion).As we wished to investigate the occurrenceof
Arg32/Glu33-split proinsulinand
Arg6e/Gly"-split
proinsulin
(in
addition
to the occurrence of the relateddes-dipeptide proinsulin
inter-mediates)in both tissues and thecirculation,we next
examined
the useof reverse-phase HPLC and
radioimmunoassay
todif-ferentiate among the four major intermediates of
proinsulin
conversion. Fig. 4 Aillustrates the central
portion of
anHPLC profileresultingfrom (a)theinjection ofnanogram-quantities
of
des-Arg3m,Arg32-proinsulin
anddes-LyseArg65-proinsulin,
(b)
thecollection ofeffluent fractions, and (c) theanalysis of eluted
0
_800o ui
roinsulin
60 insuln
0
o 400
E
Fiur
3.Qatttv3nlsi2fponu
oveso oislnb0 des-Arg3l, Arg _proinsulin
0 C1.
20-~~~~~des
-Lys",
Arg5Proinsui0 2 4 6 8 10 30o
Incubation period, min
Figure
3.Quantitative
analysis
ofproinsulin
conversiontoinsulinby
amixture of
trypsin plus
carboxypeptidase
B.Samples
ofhumanproinsulin
incubatedwithtrypsin plus
carboxypeptidase
Bas de-scribed in Methodswereanalyzed byreverse-phaseHPLC(seeFig. 2).Electronicintegration of peakareasderived frommeasurementof op-tical absorbanceat214nmpermitted
quantitative
analysis
of the con-version process over the 30-minperiodshown. Dataareplotted sepa-rately forproinsulin,des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin,
des-Lys',Arg65-proin-sulin andinsulin,and represent
insulin-containing
forms only; C-peptidereleasedduringprecursorprocessingwas notconsideredinthisanalysis.
of
material
werequantitated
byoptical
absorbance) andfrom
the
lack
of
selectivity of
ourradioimmunoassay for insulin, the
conversion
intermediates
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
and
des-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin
were wellseparated andreadily
detected asimmunoreactive insulin.
Also asexpected,des-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin
(apeptide
thatcontains
thefree
C-peptideCOOH-terminus and the
Arg3m-Arg32
linkage
between theCOOH-ter-minal
region of
theinsulin
B-chain
and theNH2-terminal
region
of
theC-peptide) reacted
wellin
ourradioimmunoassays for
both
C-peptide
andproinsulin.
On theother hand,
des-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin
(apeptide
containing
ablocked
C-peptide
COOH-terminus
andlacking the
Arg31-Arg32
linkage)
showed very poorreactivity
in both assays. Theseparation
andanalysis
of
Arg32/Gly33-split
proinsulin
andArg6s/Glyss-split
proinsulin
by
useof
identical
methods areillustrated in Fig.
4B.The twopeptides
werewell resolved and
easily
detectedby insulin
ra-dioimmunoassay,
and,
again,
only that peptide
containing the
complete
Arg3t-Arg32
linkage
atthe
precursorconversion site
(that
is,
Arg6`/Glys6-split
proinsulin)
reactedin
theproinsulin
assay. In contrast to
des-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin,
however,Arg65/
Glyss-split proinsulin
showed only minimal
reactivity
in the
assayfor
C-peptide;
this result
is consistent with
theknown
specificity
of our
antibody
and arisesfrom
themasking
of theCOOH-terminus of
theC-peptide by the dipeptide sequenceLys4-Arg6'.
It
is important
thatthe intermediates of proinsulin examined inFig.
4 A and B maintain unique character in their elutionfrom
the HPLC column and that, as illustrated in Fig. 4 C, resolutionis
maintained
duringchromatography
of amixture of allfour peptides.
Theidentification
of thetwo
least-wellsep-arated
intermediates,
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
andArg65/Glyll-split
proinsulin,
is greatly enhanced by the selective reactivity of only the latter in our proinsulin radioimmunoassay.Applications of
methods for theanalysis
ofproinsulin
in-termediates inhuman tissuesproceeded
with thestudy
of both Bcell
tumorsandnormal
pancreas. Use of classical methods fortissue extraction, for gel
filtration ofresulting
insulin- andproinsulin-containing fractions, and for
insulin radioimmu-noassayallowed us todetermine that material having
themo-lecular
weight of
proinsulin and proinsulin intermediatesac-countedfor 1.7
and 2.0%
ofthe immunoreactive insulin intwospecimens
of normal pancreas and 5.3 and 5.9% of the immu-noreactiveinsulin
intwoB cell tumors(data
notshown);
the increased relative amount of higher molecular weight material ininsulinomatissue
has been reported before (12,13,
38). Asillustrated in Fig.
5, reverse-phaseHPLC analysis of9,000
mol wtmaterial from the
twospecimens of
normal pancreas and thetwo B cell tumors revealed that the
major
fraction could beidentified
asproinsulin
in each case and that the pattern ofproinsulin
conversion intermediates was surprisinglysimple.
In the two samples of normal tissue,des-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin
anddes-Lys4,Arg65-proinsulin
wereidentifiedin the ratio 2.7:1 and 3.2:1, whereas in the two B cell tumors,des-Arg3l-Arg32-proin-sulin was easily identified, but
des-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin
wasbarely detectable. In no case were we able to detect
Arg32/Glu33-split proinsulin or
Arg65/Gly'-split
proinsulin in the samples of normal orneoplastic tissue. Subsequent studies not illustrated in Fig. 5showed,
asexpected, that material identified as des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin was not detected by immunoassaysdi-100 A'
A 80-
60-C
o 40-_ 2
0-0200 B 60h
* I
120
-C.1
80 -I40
~
0
E
60- 40-
20-100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 Fraction number
Figure4.HPLC elutionprofilesofhumanproinsulinconversion in-termediates detectedbyuseofradioimmunoassaysfor insulin (-), proinsulin (o),andC-peptide (x).Dataare shownfor the central por-tionsof the HPLCprofiles(theregions in which intermediates of proinsulin conversion are eluted) only. (A) A mixture of
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin
(left) anddes-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin
(right). (B) Amixture ofArg32/Glu33-split
proinsulin (left) andArg65/Gly"-split
proinsulin(right). (C) A mixture of all four intermediates of conver-sion. Theorderof elution of the four intermediates in C isgivenby
Arg32/Glu33-split
proinsulin,des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin,
Arg65/Gly"-splitproinsulin,
des-Lys6&,Arg6e-proinsulin
(the firstthrough fourth peaks inC,fromlefttoright,respectively).Peptideswereidentifiedby comparisonwith standards,asdescribed in Methods.C
0
0
0
0
0
a
E a.
0
0 C
1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 AB
3II I/f'l I~~~~~~0io
-I 0.
C
+
+
7+
+
D+ +
+
.2,4&
T10 125 140 155 170x210 225 240110 125 140 155 170210 225 240
Fraction number
Figure 5. HPLCelutionprofilesof9,000mol wt, insulin-immuno-reactive material extracted fromtwohumanBcelltumors(A andB) andfromtwospecimens ofnormal human pancreas(CandD). Pep-tidesweredetected byuseof theradioimmunoassayforinsulin.Only
thoseregions of theprofile correspondingtoproinsulinconversion in-termediates andtoproinsulinitselfareshown;noimmunoreactive material was detected in otherregions. The elutionpositionsof stan-dardsareshownby verticalarrows atthe top of thefigure: 1,Arg32/ Glu33-split proinsulin; 2,
des-Arg3t,Arg32-proinsulin;
3,Arg65/Gly66-split proinsulin;4,
des-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin;
5,proinsulin.Notethe difference in scale used inplottingdatacorrespondingtointermediates and thosecorrespondingtoproinsulin.rected toward
C-peptide
orproinsulin, whereas material
iden-tified
asdes-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin
reactedwell
inboth
assays.Because
of
intensified interest in
thebiological activities of
human
proinsulin
(24-26) and becauseof
thepotential
valueof proinsulin
therapy as anadjunct
toinsulin
administration inthe
managementof diabetes (26),
wequestioned
whetherex-ogenously administered
proinsulin
wasconvertedeither
toin-termediates of conversion
or toinsulin
in the courseof its
usein
diabetic subjects.
Asthe
routeof
proinsulin administration
in humans and
its inherent
proteolytic
susceptibility
are mattersof equal
concern,conversion of
the precursor asthe resultof
boththe intravenous route of administration
(a
routeof interestmainly during controlled clinical
investigation)
and the subcu-taneous routeof administration (a
routeof
potential importance
during
the
managementof diabetic
patients)
wereexamined.Fig.
6 showsradioimmunoassay-derived
HPLCprofiles of
plasma components
arising from
theintravenous administration
ofbiosynthetic
humanproinsulin
tothreeinsulin-treated diabetic
subjects;
thevariable
amounts ofporcine
insulin
identified in theHPLCprofiles arise from
circulating insulin-antibody
com-plexes.
Althougheach of
theprofiles
reveals asmall amountof
des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin,
conversion intermediates
represented
<1% of circulating proinsulin-related material
in eachcaseand humaninsulin was not detected.Fig.
7illustrates HPLCprofiles
of plasma
componentsarising from
the subcutaneousadmin-istration of human
proinsulin
to the same threesubjects.
Incontrast to
findings
shown inFig. 6,
subcutaneousadministration
of
the precursor resulted in thedetection
of sizableamountsof
proinsulin conversion intermediates
in the circulation.Inter-mediates resembling both
des-Arg3lArg32-proinsulin
andArg65/
3 Gly66-split proinsulin were identified in all three individuals. The sum of these intermediates plus
des-Lys6',Arg65-proinsulin
andArg32/Glu33-split proinsulin represented about 4, 6, and 11%
2 ofthetotal proinsulin-like material in subjects 1, 2, and 3, re-spectively. Material resembling human insulin was detected
in
X only asingle
subject
(subject 3), where it represented -1% of total insulinimmunoreactivity.
Notwithstanding the variable 3 detection of immunoreactive material in the region of the profiles O ofFig. 7spanning fractions 45 to 65, it is clear that subcutaneous 3 ¢-proinsulin
infusion in humans results in the metabolism of the precursor to multiple physically and immunologically distinct2
forms.
Discussion
Ouruseofisocratic reverse-phase HPLC, coupledwith radioim-munoassay for peptide detection, has permitted the separation and
analysis
ofproinsulin-derived peptides of humans undera variety of circumstances. Human proinsulin, des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin, des-LysM,Arg65-des-Arg31,Arg32-proinsulin, Arg32/Glu33-split proin-sulin, Arg65/Gly66-split proinsulin, and insulin (as wellasbeef and pork insulin)arereadily identified by their elution positionsand theirselective immunoreactivities in insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulinassays.Althoughouruseof ion-pairingagents (trieth-ylammonium and phosphate salts) in HPLC buffers precludes aneasyassessmentof relative peptide hydrophobicity,notethat Arg32/Glu33 and
Arg65/Gly'-split
proinsulinsarewell separatedby adsorption to the C-18 column matrix. The separation of
A B C 444
0
E a.
2 3 4 5
4
4
4
sub.
...
II X
0
a. sub.2 ...* -.iA
X 0.04---_
-E 0
E 0 40 80 120 160' 210 23
Fraction number
Figure6.HPLC elutionprofiles of insulin-related peptides purified from the plasma of three diabetic subjects whose blood glucose levels weremaintainedby the intravenousinfusion of human proinsulin. Procedures for immunoaffinity purification of plasma components andfor HPLCanalysisaredescribedinMethods. Data areprovided for material detected byradioimmunoassay for insulin (-), proinsu-lin (---),andC-peptide (. ).To enhanceclarity of presentation, individual data points are not shown. The same ordinate scaleis used in eachcase.Theelutionposition of standardsareindicated by verti-calarrowsatthe top of thefigure:A, bovineinsulin;B, human
insulin;C, porcine insulin; 1,
Arg32/Glu33-split
proinsulin; 2,des-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin, 3,Arg65/Gly"-split
proinsulin; 4,des-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin;
5,proinsulin. Background noisewastheequiv-alentof 0.01 pmol/ml ofinsulin,0.01pmol/mlofproinsulin,and 0.02pmol/ml ofC-peptide. -0.06pmolwasrequiredfor the detec-tionofapeak of immunoreactivepeptide.Notethattheporcine insu-linidentified in each of theprofilesis derivedfrominsulin-antibody
complexes present in the circulation of these insulin-treated diabetic
A B C
0.5-sb
1 2 3 4 5
I I
=:=q:; /, 1}
''
80 120
Fraction number
Figure 7.HPLCelutionprofilesof insulin-related peptidespurified from the plasma of three diabeticsubjectswhose blood glucoselevels
weremaintained by the subcutaneousinfusion of human proinsulin.
Detailsareprovided inthe legendtoFig.6 andinMethods. Notethat theordinate scale usedinFig. 7iscontractedsomewhatrelativetothe scale usedin Fig. 6, thesameordinate scale is usedin all threepanels
of Fig. 7, andsubjects numberedI to3inthe studyof Fig.7are
iden-ticaltothose numbered I to 3inthe studyof Fig.6,respectively.
thesepositionalisomers (like the HPLCseparationofpositional
isomers of insulin bearing aminoacid substitutionsatpositions
B24 and B25 [35, 39])identifies themascontaining important structuraldifferences thatcanalter their potential
interactions
with physicalsurfaces.
Modelstudiesinvolving the conversion of humanproinsulin
toinsulin byuse of trypsin and carboxypeptidase B have
dem-onstrated (a) the exquisite sensitivity of the Arg32-Glu33 and
Arg65-Gly'
peptide bonds of proinsulin to cleavageby trypsin (with conversion reaching completion by 30min at220Cusinga 2,000:1 molar ratio ofsubstrate toenzyme) and (b) the
re-markable stability ofthe hormone product to enzymatic deg-radation(seealsoref. 8).Moreimportant, experiments reported here identify the ratio of the conversion intermediates
des-Arg3'1,Arg32-proinsulin and
des-Lysg,Arg65-proinsulin
as -3:1both during early periods of digestion (whentheconcentration of intermediatesexceeds thatof the product) andatthesteady
state(whenthe concentration of intermediates changeslittlewith time).The valueof this ratio during early periods indicates that the rate of cleavage ofthe Arg32-Glu33 bond in proinsulin (as assessed bythe formation ofdes-Arg3tArg32-proinsulin)exceeds that ofthe
Arg65-Gly66
bond (as assessed by the formation of des-Lys",Arg65-proinsulin) by aboutthreefold.Thatthisratiois maintainedatsteadystate(and doesnotdecreasetounity)furtherindicates that
thekinetic preference of
the endoproteasefor
cleavage at the
Arg32-Glu33
conversionsite is decreased once the precursor has been processed to the two intermediate forms. Together, these results suggest that conversion of proinsulin to insulin proceeds preferentially through the righthand branch of the scheme shown inFig.
1.Ourfindings onproinsulin conversion by purified enzymes are consistent with theratio of
des-Arg3',Arg32-proinsulin
todes-Lys64,Arg65-proinsulin
identified for intermediates extracted from normal human pancreas (2.7:1 and 3.2:1 in twosamples)
and with the absence ofArg32/Glu33-
andArg65/Gly'-split
proinsulins
in the tissue specimens examined. It thus appears that in
vivo,
as in our model system,
preference
for cleavage of theArg32-Glu33
peptide bond persists and that theactivity
of the dibasic amino acid-specific carboxypeptidase is in relative kinetic excess. Nevertheless, it should be noted that (a)extensive
conversion
of proinsulin by the enzyme mixture in
vitro yields
concentra-tions ofintermediates exceeding those of theprecursor, whereas
proinsulin concentrations exceed those of
intermediates
in both normal pancreas and B cell tumors, and (b) the absenceof
sig-nificant amounts of
des-LysM,Arg65-proinsulin
in insulinoma tissue cannot be simply ascribed to the decreased transit time for precursor synthesis and product secretion identified for that tissue (40).Differences noted above
emphasize
thecomplexity
of pro-cesses that serve for the conversion ofproinsulin
toinsulin in vivo. First,while ouruseoftrypsin
as theconverting
endopro-tease was meant to simulate (rather than to
duplicate)
thephys-iological process, the
identity
of theendogenous
converting
en-zyme remains
unknown (19-23). Second, while trypsin
under our conditions shows theappropriateselectivity
forpeptide
bond cleavage, the hydrogen and metal ion requirements and the physical state of the endogenousconverting
enzyme may well playimportantroles indetermining
itsfunction.
Infact,
(a)
the ioniccomposition
of the B cellsecretion
granule(a
composition
requiring
consideration
of atleast
Zn",
Ca",
Na , andK+)
differsconsiderably from that
of
thebuffer used for
ourenzymatic
studies, and (b) the pH
optimum for
theendogenous
converting
enzyme islikely to be
acidic rather
thanslightly
basic,
asit
is for trypsin (23). Third, our enzymaticstudies examined
thecon-version of
proinsulin
in dilutesolution rather
than at thehigh
concentrations that occur in
immature
Bcellsecretion
granules
andlead eventually to
crystallization of
the hormoneproduct.
Indeed, studies on
crystal
growth have shown thatproinsulin
does notcrystallize with zinc
under conditions
where the rhom-bohedralzinc-insulincrystal
isreadily
formed,
but thatproinsulin
and insulin form
mixed crystals when
the molefraction of
the precursor is lessthan about
0.4 (41). It is thusprobable
that
the cocrystallization ofproinsulin, intermediates of proinsulin
con-version,and
insulin within
thematuring
B cellsecretion granule,
aprocess
requiring decreased
pHand
the presenceof
Zn+, (a)
causes theslowing and
eventual termination of
conversion, (b)
results inthe
trapping
of smallamounts
of precursor andinter-mediates,
and (c)directs
theproportions
of precursor andin-termediates stored
in theinsulin producing
cell.Since
circulating proinsulin
retains thepotential for
pro-cessing
toconversion intermediates
or toinsulin, considerations
of
proinsulin metabolism
havespecial
importance when theprecursor
isstudied
for itstherapeutic efficacy
indiabetes. Very
little
processing
of theprecursor
toproinsulin
conversion inter-mediates and no processing of the precursor to insulin was de-tected during our analysis of plasma from diabeticsubjects
Implications of Proinsulin ConversionIntermediates 1403 '9
0
E
0
0
CaL
0
C._
0 0
0
E
managed by the intravenous administration of proinsulin. This resultdemonstrates that (a) neither the vascularcompartment
nor any organ to which circulating
proinsulin
has access (most notably the liver and kidney [42, 43]) has the potential forme-tabolizing
the
precursor andreleasing
to thecirculation moreactive
products at a significant rate, and (b) the biological activity oftheintravenously administered precursorinvivo(24-26) arises solely from its specific interaction with hormone-sensitive tissues. On the other hand, our results also show that the subcutaneousadministration
of proinsulin (the route most often taken inclin-ical
practice and most applicable when considering proinsulin therapy) gives rise to the appearance of variable, but significantquantities
ofconversion intermediates in the blood. Rates of bothformation and clearance of these intermediatesare impor-tant indetermining their appearance under steady-state condi-tions.Nevertheless, the high receptor binding and biologicalac-tivities ofproinsulin intermediates relativetoproinsulin in vitro (6,
44-46)
andthe well known direct relationship between insulin receptor occupancy and insulin degradation (47, 48) suggest thatthe
rateof
clearance ofproinsulin
intermediates would exceedthat of the intact
hormone precursor. Thus, it is probablethat(a) proinsulin conversion
intermediatesidentified in theplasmaofproinsulin-treated subjects
arise from activeprocesses (rather than from the accumulation of compounds that might be present inthe infusion
solution in trace amounts), and (b) thesecon-version
intermediates
have thepotential for contributing
tothebiological activity of subcutaneously
infusedproinsulin.
Variable
proteolysis
in thesubcutaneous compartment mayin
fact
resultin
either degradation
of theinfused
agent to less active material ortransformation of the agent to more activeproducts. While only the first of
theseprocessesapplies
to thesubcutaneous administration
of insulin (in the extreme casecausing
thesyndrome of massive degradation
of subcutaneousinsulin
[49]),
both
processes apply to thesubcutaneous
admin-istration
of
proinsulin (a peptide with
thepotential for
metab-olism
toboth less
active
and more activeforms).
Although (a)the
separatecontributions of proinsulin
andproinsulin
conver-sion
intermediates
tomaintaining glycemic
controlin
diabetic
subjects
is
not yetsubject
to accuratequantitation (and
may well varyfrom
oneindividual
to another), and(b) studies
re-ported
here haveemphasized steady-state infusions
and precursorprocessing (rather
than thestrict regulation
ofblood glucose
levels),
ourfindings
form
abasefor considering
themechanisms
by which subcutaneously infused
proinsulin
exertsits biological
effects in vivo. Extensions of these studies
willcontribute to anunderstanding of
precursorprocessing
inpeptide
hormonebio-genesis
and to anappreciation
of
proteolysis
inthe
metabolism
of
peptides
used
astherapeutic
agents.Acknowledgments
The authors thank Arlene Timosciek for assistance in preparing the manuscript, and the National Diabetes Research Interchange for pro-viding the specimen of human tissue donor pancreas.
This workwassupported by grantsAM 18347,AM13941, andAM 20595from NationalInstitutes of Health.
Referpnces
1.Steiner, D. F., and P. E. Oyer. 1967. The biosynthesis of insulin andaprobable precursor of insulin by a human islet cell insulinoma. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 57:473-480.
2.Steiner,D.F.,D.Cunningham,L.Spigelman,and B. Aten. 1967.
Insulin biosynthesis: evidence for a precursor. Science (Wash. DC). 157: 697-700.
3. Chance, R. E., R. M. Ellis, and W. W. Bromer. 1968. Porcine proinsulin: characterization andamino acid sequence. Science (Wash.
DC).
161:165-167.4. Steiner, D. F.,0. Hallund, A. Rubenstein, S. Sho, and C. Bayliss. 1968. Isolation and properties of proinsulin, intermediate forms and otherminorcomponentsfrom crystalline bovine insulin. Diabetes. 17: 725-736.
5. Tager, H. S., C. Patzelt, R. K. Assoian, S. J. Chan, J. R. Duguid, and D. F. Steiner. 1980. Biosynthesis of islet cell hormones. Ann. NY Acad Sci. 343:133-147.
6. Chance, R. E. 1971. Chemical, physical, biological and immu-nological studies on porcine proinsulin and related polypeptides. In Di-abetes. R. R. Rodriguez and J. Vallance-Owens, editors. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam. 292-305.
7. Steiner, D. F., J. L. Clark, C. Nolan, A. H. Rubenstein, E. Mar-goliash, B. Aten, and P. E. Oyer. 1969. Proinsulin and the biosynthesis
of insulin. Recent Progr. Hormone Res.
25:207-270.
8. Kemmler,W., J. E. Peterson,and D. F. Steiner. 1971. Studies on the conversion of proinsulin to insulin. J.Bid. Chem.246:6786-6791. 9. Steiner, D. F., P. E. Oyer, S. Cho, F. Melani, and A. H. Rubenstein. 1971. Structural and immunological studies on human proinsulin. In Diabetes. R. R. Rodriguez and J.
Vallance-Owen,
editors. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam. 281-291.10. Roth,J., P. Gordon, and I. Pastan. 1968. "Big insulin": a new component of plasma insulin detected by radioimmunoassay. Proc.Nail. Acad. Sci. USA. 61:138-145.
11. Melani, F. D., A. H. Rubenstein, and D, F. Steiner. 1970. Human serum proinsulin. J. Clin. Invest. 49:497-507.
12.Gutman, R. A., N. R. Lazarus, J. C. Penhos, S. Fajans, and L. Recant. 1971. Circulating proinsulin-like material in patients with func-tioning insulinomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 284:1003-1008.
13.Sherman, B. M., S. Pek, S. S. Fajans, J. C. Floyd, Jr., and J. W. Conn. 1972. Plasma proinsulin in patients with functioning pancreatic islet celltumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 3:271-280.
14. DeHadn,C., S. A. Little, J. M.
May,
and R. M. Williams. 1978. Characterization of proinsulin-insulin intermediates in human plasma. J. Clin. Invest. 62:727-737.15. Gabbay, K. H., K. De Luca, J. N. Fisher, M. E. Mako, and A. H. Rubenstein. 1976. Familial hyperproinsulinemia: an autosomal
dominant
defect. N.Engl.J.Med. 294:911-915.16.Robbins,D. C., P. M. Blix, A. H. Rubenstein, Y. Kanazawa, K. Kosaka, and H. S. Tager. 1981. A human
proinsulin
variant at arginine65.Nature(Lond.).291:679-681.
17. Robbins, D. C., S. E. Shoelson, A. H.Rubenstein, and H. S. Tager. 1984. Familial hyperproinsulinemia: two families secreting in-distinguishable type
II
intermediates of proinsulin conversion. J. Clin. Invest. 73:714-719.18. Clark, J. L., and D. F. Steiner. 1969. Insulin biosynthesis in the rat: demonstration of two proinsulins. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 62: 278-285.
19.Ole-Moi Yoi,O., G. S. Pinkus, J. Spragg, and K. F. Austin. 1979. Identification of human glandular kallikrein in the beta cell of the pan-creas. N.Engl. J. Med. 300:1289-1294.
20.
Viri,
M. A., J.-D. Vassalli, R. D. Estensen, and E. Reich. 1980. Plasminogen activator of islets of Langerhans: modulation by glucose and correlation with insulin production. Proc.NatL. Acad.Sci. USA. 77: 875-879.21.Docherty, K., R. J. Carroll, and D. F. Steiner. 1982. Conversion of proinsulin to insulin: involvement of a 31,000 molecular weight thiol protease. Proc.
Nat!.
Acad.Sci. USA. 79:4613-4617.22. Powers, C. A., and A.Nasjletti. 1982.Anovelkinin-generating
protease (kininogenase) in the porcine anterior pituitary. J. Biol. Chem.
257:5594-5600.
R. Bergenstahl, K.Polonsky, J. Jaspan, A. H.Rubenstein, B. Frank, J. Galloway, and J.M.Olefsky. 1984. The effects of biosynthetic human proinsulin on carbohydrate metabolism. Diabetes. 33:762-770.
25. Henry, R., L.Schmeiser,0. Kolterman, R. Cohen, A. Rubenstein, B.Frank, J. Galloway, and J. M. Olefsky. 1984. Biosynthetic human insulin andproinsulin have additive but notsynergistic effects on total body glucosedisposal. J.Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 58:1094-1098.
26. Bergenstahl, R. M., R. M. Cohen, E. Lever, K. Polonsky, J. Jaspan, P.M. Blix, R. Revers, J. M.Olefsky, 0. Kolterman, D.Steiner, A. Cher-rington, B. Frank, J. Galloway, and A. H. Rubenstein. 1984. The met-abolic effectsofbiosynthetichumanproinsulin inindividualswith Type Idiabetes. J. Clin.Endocrinol. Metab. 58:973-979.
27. Heding, L.G. 1977. Specific anddirect radioimmunoassay for
humanproinsulin in serum. Diabetologia. 13:467-474.
28.Rainbow, S. J., J.S. Woodhead, D. K. Yue, S. D. Luzio, and C.N. Hales. 1979. Measurementof human proinsulin by an indirect two-siteimmunoradiometric assay. Diabetologia. 17:229-234.
29. Cohen, R. M., T. Nakabayashi, P. M. Blix, P. A. Rue, S. E. Shoelson, M.A.Root, B. H.Frank,R. R.Revers, andA.H.Rubenstein. 1985. Aradioimmunoassay for circulating humanproinsulin. Diabetes. 34:84-91.
30. Cohen, R. M., S. Provow, T. Nakabayashi, P. Blix, P. Rue, R.S. Gray, M. Root, B. H. Frank, J. Jaspan, H. S. Tager, andA.H. Rubenstein. 1984.Site-specific radioimmunoassay in the evaluation of
circulatingproinsulin and its intermediates. Clin. Res. 32:518A. 31. Peavy, D.E., J. D. Abram, B. H. Frank, and W. C. Duckworth. 1984. In vitroactivity of biosynthetic human proinsulin. Diabetes. 33: 1062-1067.
32.Podlecki, D. A., B. H. Frank, and J. M. Olefsky. 1984.In vitro characterizationof biosynthetic human proinsulin. Diabetes.
33:111-118.
33. Tager, H., B.Given, D. Baldwin, M. Mako,J.Markese,A.
Ru-benstein, J. Olefsky, M. Kobayashi, 0. Kolterman, and R. Poucher. 1979.Astructurallyabnormalinsulincausinghumandiabetes. Nature
(Lond.).281:122-125.
34.Given,B. D., M. E.Mako, H. S. Tager, D.Baldwin,J.Markese,
A. H. Rubenstein, J. Olefsky, M. Kobayashi, 0. Kolterman, and R. Poucher. 1980. Diabetes due to secretionof an abnormal insulin. N. Engl.J.Med.302:129-135.
35.Shoelson, S., M. Haneda, P.Blix,A.Nanjo,T.Sanke, K. Inouye, D. Steiner,A.Rubenstein, and H. Tager. 1983. Threemutantinsulins inman.Nature(Lond.). 302:540-543.
36. Faber, 0. K.,C. Binder, J. Markussen, L. G. Heding, V. K. Naithani, H.Kuzuya, P. M. Blix, D. L. Horwitz, andA.H.Rubenstein. 1978.Characterization ofsevenC-peptideantisera.Diabetes. 27(Suppl.
1): 170-177.
37.Starr,J.L.,D.L.Horwitz,A.H.Rubenstein, and M. G. Mako. 1979. Insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide. In Methods ofHuman Ra-dioimmunoassay. G. E. Jaffe and H. R. Behrman, editors. Academic Press, Inc., New York. 613-629.
38.Alsever, R. N., J. P. Roberts, J. G. Gerber, M. E. Mako, and A. H.Rubenstein. 1975. Insulinoma with low circulating insulin levels: thediagnostic value of proinsulinmeasurements. Ann.Intern.Med. 82: 347-350.
39. Shoelson, S., M. Fickova, H. Haneda,A. Nahum, G. Musso, E. T. Kaiser, A. Rubenstein, and H. Tager. 1983. Identification ofa mutanthumaninsulin predicted to contain a serine for phenylalanine substitution. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA. 80:7390-7394.
40.Creutzfeldt, C., N. S. Track, and W. Creutzfeldt. 1973. In vitro studies of the rate of proinsulin and insulinturnoverin seven human insulinomas. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 3:371-384.
41.Steiner, D. F. 1973. Cocrystallization of proinsulin and insulin. Nature(Lond.).243:528-530.
42.Rubenstein,A.H., L. A. Pottenger, M. Mako, G. S. Getz, and D. F.Steiner. 1972. Themetabolism of proinsulin and insulin by the liver. J. Clin.Invest. 51:912-921.
43. Katz, A.H., and A. H.Rubenstein. 1973. Metabolism of proin-sulin, inproin-sulin, and C-peptide in the rat. J. Clin. Invest. 52:1113-1121.
44.Yu, S. S.,andA. E.Kitabchi. 1973. Biological activity ofproinsulin and relatedpolypeptides in fat tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 248:3753-3761.
45.Robbins, D. C.,H.S. Tager, and A. H.Rubenstein. 1984. Bio-logical and clinicalimportance of proinsulin. N.Engl. J. Med. 310:1165-1175.
46. Frank, B. H.,A.H. Pekar, C. S. Hooker, D. E. Peavy, M. R. Brunner, and W.C.Duckworth. 1984. Preparation and characterization ofsplit forms of human proinsulin. Diabetologia. 27:276A.
47.Terris, S., and D. F. Steiner. 1975. Binding and degradation of
'I-insulinby rat hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 250:8389-8398. 48.Terris, S., and D. F. Steiner. 1976. Retention and degradation of'251-insulin by perfused rat livers. J. Clin. Invest. 57:885-896.
49. Paulsen, E. P., J. W. Courtney, and W. C. Duckworth. 1979. Insulinresistance caused by massive degradation of subcutaneous insulin.
Diabetes. 28:640-645.