• No results found

Some numerical results on two classes of finite groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Some numerical results on two classes of finite groups"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Vol. 3, No 1, (2015), pp 63-72

SOME NUMERICAL RESULTS ON TWO CLASSES OF FINITE GROUPS

M. HASHEMI∗AND M. POLKOUEI

Abstract. In this paper, we consider the finitely presented groups GmandK(s, l) as follows;

Gm=ha, b|am=bm= 1, [a, b]a= [a, b], [a, b]b= [a, b]i K(s, l) =ha, b|abs=bla, bas=albi;

and find the nth-commutativity degree for each of them. Also we

study the concept of n-abelianity on these groups, where m, n, s

andl are positive integers,m, n≥2 andg.c.d(s, l) = 1.

1. Introduction

LetGbe a finite group. The nth-commutativity degree ofG, written

Pn(G), is defined as the ratio

|{(x, y)∈G×G|xny =yxn}|

|G|2 .

The nth-commutativity degree, first defined by Mohd. Ali and Sarmin

[11]. In 1945, F. Levi introduced n-abelian groups [10]. For n > 1, a group G is called n-abelian if (xy)n = xnyn for all x and y in G.

Abelian groups and groups of exponent dividingnare clearlyn-abelian. Some other studies of this concept can be seen in [1, 2, 5]. In [9], the nth-commutativity degree andn-abelianity of 2-generated p-groups

of nilpotency class two have been studied. Through this paper, the standard notation [a, b] = a−1b−1ab is used for the commutator of the

MSC(2010): Primary: 20P05; Secondary: 20D15.

Keywords: Nilpotent groups,nth-commutativity degree,n-abelian groups. Received: 17 March 2015, Accepted: 19 May 2015.

∗Corresponding author.

(2)

elements a and b.

Here, we consider the following finitely presented groups:

Gm =ha, b|am=bm = 1, [a, b]a= [a, b], [a, b]b = [a, b]i, m≥2;

K(s, l) = ha, b|abs =bla, bas =albi, where g.c.d(s, l) = 1,

which are nilpotent groups of nilpotency class two.

In Section 2, we state some lemmas and theorems are needed in the

proofs of main results. Section 3 is devoted to compute the nth

-commutativity degree of Gm and Km, where m = l − s + 1 and

Km = K(1, m). The n-abelianity of these groups have been studied

as well.

2. Preliminary

In this section, we state some lemmas and theorems which will be used in other sections. First, we state a lemma without proof that establishes some properties of groups of nilpotency class two.

Lemma 2.1. If G is a group and G0 ⊆ Z(G), then the following hold for every integer k and u, v, w ∈G :

(i) [uv, w] = [u, w][v, w] and [u, vw] = [u, v][u, w]; (ii) [uk, v] = [u, vk] = [u, v]k;

(iii) (uv)k =ukvk[v, u]k(k−1)/2.

The following lemma can be seen in [6].

Lemma 2.2. Let Gm = ha, b|am = bm = 1, [a, b]a = [a, b], [a, b]b =

[a, b]i where m ≥2 , then we have

(i) every element ofGm can be uniquely presented byaibj[a, b]t, where

1≤i, j, t≤m.

(ii) |Gm|=m3.

Now, we state some lemmas which can be found in [3, 4].

Lemma 2.3. The groups K(s, l) = ha, b|abs = bla, bas = albi, where

g.c.d(s, l) = 1, have the following properties:

(i) |K(s, l)|=|l−s|3, if g.c.d(s, l) = 1 and is infinite otherwise;

(ii) if g.c.d(s, l) = 1, then |a|=|b|= (l−s)2 and al−s =bs−l.

Lemma 2.4. (i) For every l≥3, K(s, l)∼=K(1,2−l).

(3)

Lemma 2.5. Every element of Km can be uniquely presented by x =

bγa(m−1)δ, where 1β, γ, δ m1.

Lemma 2.6. InKm, [a, b] =bm−1 ∈Z(Km).

Also we recall the following lemma of [8].

Lemma 2.7. For the integers α, β, (0≤α ≤β) and variablesx, z and

u, the number of solutions of the equation pαx≡zu (mod pβ) is

p2β−1((α+ 1)p−α).

Proposition 2.8. For the integer β and variables x, y, z and u, the number of solutions of the equation xy≡zu (mod pβ) is

p2β−1(pβ+1+pβ −1).

Proof. By Lemma 2.7, the number of solutions of xy≡ij (mod pβ) is

β X

α=0

φ(pβ−α)p2β−1((α+ 1)p−α).

To complete the proof, we proceed as follows:

β X

α=0

φ(pβ−α)p2β−1((α+ 1)p−α)

= p2β−1((β+ 1)p−β) +p3β−2(p−1)

β−1

X

α=0

(α+ 1)p−α pα

= p2β−1((β+ 1)p−β) +p3β−2(p−1)(p+ 2

β−1

X

α=0

1

pt −

β+ 1

pβ−1 )

= p3β −p3β−1+ 2p2β−1(p−1)p

β 1

p−1 +p

2β−1

= p2β−1(pβ+1+pβ−1).

Corollary 2.9. For the integer n = pα1

1 p

α2

2 ...p

αk

k and variables x, y, z

and u, the number of solutions of the equation xy ≡ zu (mod n) is

Qk i=1pi

2αi−1(p

(4)

Corollary 2.10. Let m, n be integers and x, y, z and u be variables where 1 ≤ x, z ≤ n and 1 ≤ y, u ≤ m. Then the number of solutions of the equation xy≡zu (mod d) is

(m

d) 2(n

d) 2

k Y

i=1

pi2αi−1 piαi+1+piαi −1

where d=g.c.d(m, n) =pα1

1 p

α2

2 ...p

αk

k .

3. The nth

-commutativity degree of Gm and Km

In this section, by considering the groups Gm and Km we get

ex-plicit formulas for theirnth-commutativity degrees. First, we prove the

following proposition.

Proposition 3.1. For the integers m, n≥2;

(1) If G=Gm and x∈G, then we have

xn =anibnj[a, b]nt−n(n2−1)ij;

(2) If G=Km and x∈G, then we have

xn=anβbnγan(m−1)δ+n(n2−1)(m−1)βγ.

Proof. We use an induction method onn. By Lemma 2.2, the assertion holds for n= 1. Now, let

xn =anibnj[a, b]nt−n(n2−1)ij.

Then

xn+1 =anibnj[a, b]nt−n(n2−1)ijaibj[a, b]t.

Since G0 ⊆Z(G), by Lemma 2.1 we have

xn+1 =a(n+1)ib(n+1)j[a, b](n+1)t−n(n2+1)ij.

The second part may be proved in a similar way.

Theorem 3.2. For m, n ≥ 2, let G = Gm, l = g.c.d(n, m) and m

l =p1

α1p2α2· · ·p

sαs. Then we have:

Pn(G) = s Y

i=1

piαi+1+piαi−1

pi2αi+1

(5)

Proof. LetAn ={(x, y)∈G×G|xny=yxn}. By Lemma 2.2, we can

writex=ai1bj1[a, b]t1 andy=ai2bj2[a, b]t2 where 1i

1, i2, j1, j2, t1, t2 ≤

m. Then by Proposition 3.1 we have

xn=ani1bnj1[a, b]nt1−n(n2−1)i1j1

So

xny=ani1bnj1[a, b]nt1−n(n2−1)i1j1ai2bj2[a, b]t2.

Since G is a group of nilpotency class two, G0 ⊆ Z(G). Hence by

Lemma 2.1

xny = ani1bnj1ai2bj2[a, b]nt1+t2−n(n2−1)i1j1

= ani1+i2[b, a]ni2j1bnj1+j2[a, b]nt1+t2−n(n2−1)i1j1

= ani1+i2bnj1+j2[a, b]nt1+t2−n(n2−1)i1j1−ni2j1.

On the other hand, we obtain

yxn=ani1+i2bnj1+j2[a, b]nt1+t2−n(n2−1)i1j1−ni1j2.

So if xny=yxn,then

ani1+i2bnj1+j2[a, b]nt1+t2−n(n2−1)i1j1−ni2j1 =ani1+i2bnj1+j2[a, b]nt1+t2−n(n2−1)i1j1−ni1j2.

Thus by uniqueness of presenting ofxnyandyxn, Lemma 2.2, we must

have

[a, b]ni1j2−ni2j1 = 1.

Because of |G0| = m, ni1j2 ≡ ni2j1 (mod m). Furthermore, if l = g.c.d(n, m) then we have

i1j2 ≡i2j1 (mod m l ).(∗)

Now, let ml = p1α1p2α2· · ·psαs, where pi are prime numbers and αi

are positive integers. So by Lemma 2.10, the number of solutions of congruence (∗) is

( m

m/l) 2( m

m/l) 2

s Y

i=1

pi2αi−1 piαi+1+piαi−1

.

Now since the parameters k1 and k2 are free and 1 ≤ k1, k2 ≤ m, we

obtain

|An|=m2l4 s Y

i=1

pi2αi−1 piαi+1+piαi −1

(6)

Finally

Pn(G) =

|An|

|G|2

= m

2l4 Qs

i=1pi2αi−1(piαi+1+piαi−1)

m6

= 1

(m/l)4

s Y

i=1

pi2αi−1 piαi+1+piαi−1

=

Qs

i=1pi2αi−1(piαi+1+piαi−1) Qs

i=1p 4αi

i

=

s Y

i=1

piαi+1+piαi −1

pi2αi+1

.

The following table is a verified result of GAP [7], when m= 6.

n l m/l The number of solutions Pn(G)

1 1 6 330 21655

2 2 3 528 11

27

3 3 2 810 5

8

4 2 3 528 1127

5 1 6 330 21655

6 6 1 1296 1

12 6 1 1296 1

Theorem 3.3. For m, n≥2, let G=Km. Then we have:

Pn(G) = s Y

i=1

piαi+1+piαi−1

pi2αi+1

,

where l=g.c.d(m−1, n) and m−1

l = p1 α1p

2α2· · ·psαs.

Proof. Let G = Km and Bn = {(x, y) ∈ G ×G|xny = yxn}. By

Lemma 2.3, we can write x = aβ1bγ1a(m−1)δ1 and y = aβ2bγ2a(m−1)δ2

where 1 ≤ β1, β2, γ1, γ2, δ1, δ2 ≤ m−1. Then by Proposition 3.1, we

have

(7)

Now by using this fact that [a, b] =bm−1 =a1−m, we obtain

xny = anβ1bnγ1an(m−1)δ1+n(n2−1)(m−1)β1γ1aβ2bγ2a(m−1)δ2

= anβ1bnγ1aβ2bγ2an(m−1)δ1+n(n2−1)(m−1)β1γ1+(m−1)δ2

= anβ1+β2bnγ1+γ2a(m−1)(nδ1+δ2+n(n2−1)β1γ1+nβ2γ1).

and also

yxn =anβ1+β2bnγ1+γ2an(m−1)δ1+(m−1)δ2+n(n2−1)(m−1)β1γ1+n(m−1)β1γ2.

So by uniqueness of presenting ofxnyandyxn, Lemma 2.5, ifxny=yxn

then

an(m−1)(β1γ2−β2γ1) = 1

and since |a|= (m−1)2;

nβ1γ2 ≡nβ2γ1 (mod m−1).

Suppose that l =g.c.d(n, m−1). Then

β1γ2 ≡β2γ1 (mod

m−1

l ). (∗∗)

Now, let m−l 1 = p1α1p2α2· · ·psαs, where pi are prime numbers and αi

are positive integers. So, by Lemma 2.10, we get

|Bn|= (m−1)2l4 s Y

i=1

pi2αi−1 piαi+1+piαi −1

.

Thus

Pn(G) =

|Bn|

|G|2

= 1

((m−1)/l)4

s Y

i=1

pi2αi−1 piαi+1+piαi−1

=

s Y

i=1

piαi+1+piαi −1

pi2αi+1

.

(8)

4. n-abelianity of Gm and Km

Here, we consider 2-generated groups Gm and Km and investigate

when these groups are n-abelian.

Theorem 4.1. Form, n≥2, Gm isn-abelian if and only ifm| n( n−1)

2 .

Proof. Letx=ai1bj1[a, b]t1 and y=ai2bj2[a, b]t2 be two elements ofG m

where 1≤i1, i2, j1, j2, t1, t2 ≤m. By using Proposition 3.1 and Lemma

2.1, we obtain

xnyn = ani1bnj1[a, b]nt1−n(n2−1)i1j1ani2bnj2[a, b]nt2−n(n2−1)i2j2

= ani1bnj1ani2bnj2[a, b]n(t1+t2)−n(n2−1)(i1j1+i2j2)

= an(i1+i2)bn(j1+j2)[a, b]n(t1+t2)−n(n2−1)(i1j1+i2j2)−n2i2j1.

On the other hand, for computing (xy)n we use an induction method

on n. Indeed

xy =ai1+i2bj1+j2[a, b]t1+t2−i2j1.

and if

(xy)n =an(i1+i2)bn(j1+j2)[a, b]n(t1+t2)−n(n2−1)(i1+i2)(j1+j2)−ni2j1,

then

(xy)n+1 = an(i1+i2)bn(j1+j2)ai1+i2bj1+j2[a, b](n+1)(t1+t2)−n(n2−1)(i1+i2)(j1+j2)−(n+1)i2j1

= a(n+1)(i1+i2)b(n+1)(j1+j2)[a, b](n+1)(t1+t2)−n(n2+1)(i1+i2)(j1+j2)−(n+1)i2j1.

By Lemma 2.2, each element ofGm has a unique expression in the form

aibj[a, b]t, 1 i, j, t m. So, G

m is n-abelian (xnyn = (xy)n, for all

x, y ∈G) if and only if

n(n−1)

2 (i1j1+i2j2)+n

2i 2j1 ≡

n(n−1)

2 (i1+i2)(j1+j2)+ni2j1(mod m) which is equivalent to

n2n

2 (i2j1−i1j2)≡0 (mod m).

Now since this holds for all x, y ∈ Gm, the group Gm is n-abelian if

and only if m|n(n−2 1).

Theorem 4.2. For m, n > 2, Km is n-abelian if and only if

m−1| n(n−1)

(9)

Proof. Let x = aβ1bγ1a(m−1)δ1 and y = aβ2bγ2a(m−1)δ2 be two elements

ofKm, where 1≤β1, β2, γ1, γ2, δ1, δ2 ≤m−1. Then by Proposition 3.1

and Lemma 2.1, we get

xnyn=an(β1+β2)bn(γ1+γ2)a(m−1)(n(δ1+δ2)+n(n2−1)(β1γ1+β2γ2)+n2β2γ1).

On the other hand by using induction on n, we obtain

(xy)n=an(β1+β2)bn(γ1+γ2)a(m−1)(n(δ1+δ2)+n(n2−1)(β1+β2)(γ1+γ2)+nβ2γ1).

Therefore by the uniqueness of presenting of (xy)n and xnyn, Km is

n-abelian if and only if

n(n−1)

2 (β1γ1+β2γ2)+n

2

β2γ1 ≡

n(n−1)

2 (β1+β2)(γ1+γ2)+nβ2γ1(mod m−1).

Hence

n2n

2 (β2γ1−β1γ2)≡0 (mod m−1).

This results that Km is n-abelian if and only if m−1|n 2−n

2 .

References

1. J. L. Alperin, A classification ofn-abelian groups, Canada. J. Math.21 (1969), 1238-1244.

2. R. Baer, Factorization of n-soluble and n-nilpotent groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.4(1953), 15-26.

3. C. M. Campbell, P. P. Campel, H. Doostie and E. F. Robertson,Fibonacci lenght for metacyclian groups, Algebra Colloq., (2004), 215-222.

4. C. M. Campbell, E. F. Robertson,On a group presentation due to Fox, Canada. Math. Bull.19(1967) 247-248.

5. C. Delizia, A. Tortora and A. Abdollahi,Some special classes ofn-abelian groups, International Journal of Group Theory, 1(2012), 19-24.

6. H. Doostie and M. Hashemi,Fibonacci lenghts involving the Wall numberK(n), J. Appl. Math. Computing,20(2006), 171-180.

7. The GAP Group, GAP-Group, Algorithm, and Programming, Version 4.4.12.(http://www.gap-system.org)

8. M. Hashemi,The commutative degree on 2-generated groups with nilpotncy class 2, Ars Combinatoria, preprinted.

9. M. Hashemi and M. Polkouei, Some numerical results on finite non-abelian 2-generator p-groups of nilpotency class two, Annals Math Iasi, preprinted. 10. F. Levi,Notes on group theory, J. Indian. Math. Soc. 9(1945), 37-42.

(10)

Mansour Hashemi

Department of pure Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, P.O.Box 41335-19141, Rasht, Iran.

Email: m−hashemi@guilan.ac.ir

Mikhak Polkouei

Department of pure Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, P.O.Box 41335-19141, Rasht, Iran.

References

Related documents

2 5 9 Ordb?ger i Danmark datamatst?ttet leksikografi i praksis Hanne Ruus & Dorthe Duncker K?benhavns Universitet Institut for Nordisk Filologi Njalsgade 80 DK 2300 K?benhavn S I et

We would like to thank, in no particular order: all of the authors who submitted papers to ALTA; the program committee for the time and effort they put into maintaining the

I Reference Manual Index Organization for Information Retrieval @ 1961 by Intemational Business Machines Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Indexing Name Indexing Subj ect

Using a fixed document collection and question set, an initial set of answer locations is used as an evaluation set alongside the TREC answer keys. and

The models of the mutual effect of the fuel rod thermomechanics and fission gas atom behavior are implemented in the RTOP code, in particular, the models of

The gross income per hectare of brinjal cultivation was the highest on large farms as compared to medium, small and marginal farms mainly because of higher productivity of

test as a method of determining the effectiveness of immunizing young infants (3 to 7 months of age) against pertussis and to compare the values determined by this method with

The present study was aimed to evaluate the susceptibility of Brucella strains isolated from human clinical specimens against commonly used antimicrobial agents.. Materials