• No results found

WING SPAR Presentation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "WING SPAR Presentation"

Copied!
67
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Design of Front and Rear Spars for The

Trainer Aircraft Wing.

(2)

TEAM

Team Members :

Akshay A.

Pradeep S. Shet

Pavan Kumar N. R.

Raghunandan M.

Lakshmana H. B.

Chetan A. V.

Guide

:

Mr. H. N. Athavale

Co-ordinator

:

Mr. Umanath Nayak

CAE

(3)

OBJECTIVE

CAD

To generate the CAD model of wing using the available data and

prepare the assembly of all components

CAE

Determine the Spar locations with respect to chord length.

Determine the dimensions for flange and web of the spars.

(4)

SCOPE OF THE PROJECT

Estimation of spar position.

Dimension calculations of front and rear spars.

Calculations for number of ribs and their positions.

CAD

Profile creation of the wing using the given NACA standards.

Creation of the wing geometry

Use available data to develop CAD models for each individual component

Prepare an assembly of all components using CATIA

(5)

Root chord

:

2400 mm

Tip chord

:

700 mm

Semi Span length

:

5500 mm

Exposed Span

:

4750 mm

Airfoil (root)

:

NACA 64A

1

215

(tip)

:

NACA 64A

1

210

Aircraft weight

:

14000 N

Lift Load

:

6g

Design Factor

:

1.5

Given Spar Position(in % of chord length)

Front Spar :

18-25

Rear Spar :

62-70

(6)

DERIVED INPUT

Limit load

: 14000 * 6=

84000 N

Design Load

: 84000 * 1.5=

126000 N

Load on semi-span

: 126000 / 2=

63000 N

Exposed wing area

:

7.3625 E6 mm

2

(7)

WING GEOMETRY

R

O

O

T

C

H

O

R

D

SWEEP AT ¼ CHORD

4750

70

0

24

00

T

IP

C

H

O

R

D

LEADING EDGE

TRAILING EDGE

Top View [RH]

(8)

AIRFOIL

Generate the aerofoil section using the Coordinates of

NACA 64A

1

215 and NACA 64A

1

210.

[source : http://www.pdas.com/sections6a.htm]

(9)

DESIGN PROCEDURE

Calculation of the Shear force, Bending moment & Torsion for the

given load.

Calculation of load distribution between the front and rear spar.

Estimation of spar positions.

(10)

DESIGN PROCEDURE

Divide the wing area into number of divisions.

Calculate the chord length at each section.

Determine the C.G of each area.

Calculate the shear force, bending moment and Torque at the respective

sections.

Shear force =pressure*area.

Bending moment=shear force*CG distance.

(11)

METHODS AND METHODOLOGY

A

10

A

9

A

8

A

7

A

6

A

5

A

4

A

3

A

2

A

1

475

2400

700

L

1

L

2

L

9

(12)

Chord Length, L

1

= L

root

-((L

root

-L

tip

) / S) * x

At section 2, L

1

= 2400-((2400-700)/4750)*4275

L

1

= 870 mm

Area of Trapezium, A

1

= 0.5*(L

1

+L

tip

)*h

A

1

= 0.5*(870+700)*475

A

1

= 373 E3 mm

2

CG of Trapezoid Section = h/3*((L

tip

+2L

1

)/(L

tip

+L

1

))

CG=475/3*((700+2*870)/(700+870))

CG = 246 mm

from L

tip

DESIGN PROCEDURE

S

x

L

root

L

tip

L

1

A

1

h

(13)

DESIGN PROCEDURE

Limit load = 84000 N

Design Load = Limit Load*Design factor

Design load on wing, = 84000*1.5

= 1,26,000 N

Design load on semi-span wing, =

63000

N

pressure load on wing [P]

=

8556.87 E-6 N/mm

2

Load At Section 2, = P

2

+P

1

= P*A

2

+P

1

= 8557 E-6 * 453625 + 3190.65

=

3881.6 + 3190.65 =

7072.25 N

Bending Moment At Section 2, M

2

= P

2

* CG

2

+ P

1

* (CG

1

+ L

2

)

M

= 3881.6 * 230 + 3190.65 * (229 + 475)

(14)

SHEAR FORCE

Root 475 950 1425 1900 2375 2850 3325 3800 4275 TIP 0.00 10000.00 20000.00 30000.00 40000.00 50000.00 60000.00 70000.00 63000.00 53590.65 44872.25 36844.85 29508.40 22862.90 16908.39 11644.85 7072.25 3190.653190.65

Shear force diagram for the wing

S

h

e

a

r

fo

rc

e

[

N

]

(15)

BENDING MOMENT

40000000

60000000

80000000

100000000

120000000

140000000

123020000 95259000 71809000 52341000 36527000 24039000

Bending moment diagram for the wing span

di

ng

m

om

en

t

[N

-m

m

]

(16)

LOAD DISTRIBUTION

Centre of Pressure, CP = 45% of Chord Length (C) from LE [870mm]

[1]

Front Spar Position

= 25% of C from LE

[217.5mm]

Rear Spar Position

= 62% of C from LE

[539.4mm]

Chord Length 'C'

45% of C

25% of C

a

b

c

62% of C

R

A

R

B

FS

RS

Chord

CP

a=174mm

b=148mm

c=322mm

C=870mm

(17)

Shear Force Distribution:

Shear Force on Front Spar, = Load * b/c

At Section 1, SF

FS

= 3190.65 * (148/322)

SF

FS

= 1465.974 N

Shear Force on Rear Spar SF

RS

= 3190.65 - 1465.974

SF

RS

= 1724.676 N

SF on Front Spar

= 45.9% of total load

SF on Rear Spar = 54.1% of total load

(18)

Bending Moment Distribution:

Moment is distributed in same ratio as that of the Shear force.

Bending Moment on Front Spar,

M

FS

= 0.459 * 781700

M

FS

= 359159 N-mm

Bending Moment on Rear Spar,

M

RS

= 781700 - 359159

M

RS

= 422541N-mm

(19)

Front Spar

Rear Spar

(20)

MATERIAL

Material

: AA 2024-T6

Ultimate tensile strength, σ

: 427 MPa

Shear strength

: 283MPa

Density

: 2.79 E-6 kg/mm

3

Young's Modulus, E

: 72400 Mpa

Poisson's Ratio

: 0.33

(21)

Moment of Inertia:

I = M*y/σ

Where, I

= Moment of Inertia, in mm

4

M = Bending Moment, in N-mm

y

= distance b/w neutral axis to top surface, in mm

σ = Tensile strength, in MPa

Moment of Inertia on Front Spar, I

FS

= 359159 * 52.8

/

427

I

FS

= 44412 mm

4

Moment of Inertia on Rear Spar, I

RS

= 422541 * 43.44

/

427

I

RS

= 42987 mm

4

(22)

MOMENT OF INERTIA

Front Spar

(23)

TORSION

Area of Torque Box, A

1

= 30980.3 mm

2

CG of Torque Box

= 165 mm From Rear spar

Distance Between CG & CP

= 18.268 mm

Torque, T = Load*d

= 3190.65 * 18.268

(24)
(25)

Torque

(26)

TORQUE DIAGRAM

ROOT 0 475 950 1425 1900 2375 2850 3325 3800 4275 TIP 4750

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

11857039.54 8689789.08 6187429.48 4252608.34 2795550.39 1734041.9 992888.78 506210.31212789.9958285.91 0

Torque diagram for the wing span

Wing span [root to tip] [mm]

T

or

qu

e

[N

-m

m

]

(27)

Shear force (SF) on Front Spar

SF

FS

= q * h

FS

SF

FS

= 0.941*105.6 =

99.34 N

Total SF on FS

= 1465.974+99.34

=

1565.313 N

On Rear Spar

SF

RS

= q*h

RS

SF

RS

= 0.941*86.88

SF

RS

= 81.729 N

Total SF on RS = 1724.676+81.729

(28)

SHEAR FORCE DUE TO TORSION

Front Spar

(29)

TOTAL SHEAR FORCE

Front Spar

(30)

WEB THICKNESS

Thickness of the Web can be calculated from the following formula,

ح

shear strength

=

SF

FS

/ A

web

Where,

ح

shear strength

= Shear strength of the material AA 2024-T6 in MPa

A

web

= Area of the web = (height * thickness) in mm

283 = 1565.313 / (105.602 * t

web

)

t

web

= 0.052 mm

Area of the web = height * thickness

=

105.602 * 0.052

A

web

= 5.531 mm

2

Moment of Inertia of Web:

Moment of Inertia of a rectangular section web is given by,

I

web

= t

web

* (h

FS

)

3

/ 12

(31)

Front Spar

Rear Spar

(32)

FLANGE

MOI

flange

= MOI

Front Spar

- MOI

Web

I

flange

= I

FS

- I

web

= 44411 - 5140.175

I

flange

= 39270.825 mm

4

Also Moment of Inertia of the flange is given by,

I

flange

= A

flange

* (y

FS

)

2

Where, I

flange

= Moment of Inertia of flange in mm

4

y

FS

= height from neutral axis to top surface of the flange in mm

Hence, A

flange

= I

flange

/ (y

FS

)

2

= 39270.825 / (52.801)

2

(33)

FLANGE

Front Spar

(34)

MASS CALCULATIONS

A

FS

= A

flange

+ A

web

A

FS

= 14.09 + 5.53 =

19.62 mm

2

V

FS

= A

FS

* 475 = 19.62 * 475

V

FS

= 9318.3 mm

3

Mass = Density * Total Volume

= 2.78 E-6 * 4218551.12

(35)

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

11.50

12.00

12.50

13.00

13.50

14.00

12.50 12.62 12.75 12.88 13.02 13.17 13.32 13.49 13.67 12.39 12.50 12.62 12.74 12.88 13.02 13.17 13.33 13.50 12.27 12.38 12.49 12.61 12.74 12.88 13.02 13.18 13.34 12.16 12.26 12.37 12.49 12.61 12.74 12.88 13.02 13.18 12.05 12.15 12.25 12.36 12.48 12.60 12.73 12.87 13.02 11.95 12.03 12.13 12.23 12.34 12.46 12.59 12.72 12.87 11.84 11.92 12.01 12.11 12.21 12.33 12.45 12.59 12.77

11.73

11.81 11.89 11.98 12.08 12.19 12.34 12.51 12.68

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Rear spar position in %

M

as

s

[k

g]

MASS CALCULATIONS

F

ro

n

t

sp

ar

p

o

si

ti

o

n

(36)

BUCKLING

To Check whether the web fails under shear

buckling.

Condition: Shear stress

induced

< Buckling stress (safe design)

The thickness calculation is based on iterations,

F

induced

= q

/

t

web

F

critical

= k*E*(t

web

/ b)

2

where

,

q = shear flow, in N/mm

E = Young's Modulus, in MPa

b = height of spar, in mm

t

web

= web thickness, in mm

[4]

(37)

BUCKLING CALCULATIONS

ITERATION 1.

RIB SPACING

FOR EQUAL DISTANCE OF 475mm

Web thickness's of front spar at section 1 is as follows,

F

induced

= q

1

/ t

web

--- (1)

= 0.941

/ 0.052

F

induced

= 18.09 N/mm

2

F

allowable

= K * E * (t

web

/ b)

2

---(2)

18.09 = 5 * 72400 * (t

web

/ 105.602)

2

The value calculated for t

web

is re substituted in Eqn.(1) and this loop will

continue till we get equal consecutive thickness.

Hence, the thickness of the web is

0.30 mm

at section 1. Same calculations were

repeated for all sections of front spar to optimize the web thickness

(38)

Front Spar

(39)

MASS CALCULATION

Web design is safe under buckling.

From buckling calculation the total mass of the spars is 16.14 kg.

By this, mass of the spars got increased by 4.41 kg.

(40)

ITERATION-2

For optimum Rib spacing, (a/b) ratio >= 1

Rib no.

Rib dist. From root

Spar heights

(a/b) ratio

K from graph

Web thickness

Web volume

FS

RS

FS

RS

FS

RS

FS

RS

[mm]

[mm]

[mm]

[mm]

[mm]

0

TIP4750

64.49

54.05

0

0.00

-

-

-

-1

4440

81.97

68.4

3.78

4.53

5.10 5.00

0.22

0.2

5590.56

4240.8

2

4110

100.58

83.67

3.28

3.94

5.17 5.08

0.34

0.3

11285.3

8283.53

3

3780

119.19

98.94

2.77

3.34

5.30 5.15

0.44

0.39

17306.53

12734.09

4

3450

137.8

114.22

2.39

2.89

5.50 5.20

0.53

0.48

24101.05

18091.81

5

3120

156.41

129.49

2.11

2.55

5.75 5.40

0.64

0.57

33033.37

24356.69

6

2790

175.02

144.76

1.89

2.28

6.00 5.60

0.74

0.67

42739.15

32006.44

7

2470

193.06

159.57

1.66

2.01

6.30 5.80

0.84

0.76

51894.8

38807.18

8

2150

211.11

174.38

1.52

1.84

6.55 6.20

0.94

0.84

63500.68

46872.81

9

1830

229.15

189.19

1.40

1.69

6.90 6.25

1.03

0.94

75528.17

56907.75

10

1520

246.63

203.53

1.26

1.52

7.25 6.55

1.12

1.02

85630.63

64357.45

11

1210

264.11

217.88

1.17

1.42

7.60 6.80

1.2

1.1

98250.04

74297.42

12

900

281.59

232.23

1.10

1.33

7.80 7.00

1.31

1.19

114355.32

85668.54

13

600

298.51

246.11

1.00

1.22

8.20 7.35

1.39

1.26

124479.09

93029.96

14

300

315.43

259.99

1.05

1.15

8.00 7.60

1.51

1.35

142888.88 105297.57

15

Root 0

332.35

273.88

1.11

1.10

7.80 7.80

1.63

1.43

162519.15 117494.52

Total volume

1053102.72 782446.56

Web volume

1835549.28

[mm

3

] [mm

3

]

FS

RS

(41)

WEIGHT CALCULATION

Finally mass of the

spars reduced by 0.89 kg when compared to 1

st

iteration.

(42)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Root 0 300 600 900 1210 1520 1830 2150 2470 2790 3120 3450 3780 4110 4440 4750

-0.40

0.00

0.40

0.80

1.20

1.60

2.00

0.39 0.36 0.34 0.32

0.29 0.27 0.25 0.22

0.20 0.17 0.15 0.12

0.10 0.07 0.04

1.63

1.51

1.39

1.31

1.20

1.12

1.03

0.94

0.84

0.74

0.64

0.53

0.44

0.34

0.22

WEB THICKNESS FOR FRONT SPAR

ACTUAL

FROM BUCKLING

FROM ROOT TO TIP [mm]

T

H

IC

K

N

E

S

S

O

F

W

E

B

[m

m

]

(43)

0.00

0.40

0.80

1.20

1.60

2.00

0.52 0.49 0.46

0.43 0.39 0.36

0.33 0.30 0.26

0.23 0.20

0.16 0.13 0.10

0.06

1.43

1.35

1.26

1.19

1.10

1.02

0.94

0.84

0.76

0.67

0.57

0.48

0.39

0.30

0.20

WEB THICKNESS FOR REAR SPAR

ACTUAL

FROM BUCKLING

T

H

IC

K

N

E

S

S

O

F

W

E

B

[m

m

]

(44)

CONCLUSION

Front Spar positioning is estimated to 25% and Rear Spar to 62% of the

Chord Length.

Flange and web dimensions are calculated and suitable changes in

dimensions are incorporated from manufacturing point of view.

Number of Ribs and their positioning for the prevention of bending and

buckling of Spars is calculated.

Mass of the spars calculated from iterations is 15.25 kg.

(45)

SCOPE FOR FURTHER WORK

Spar position can be optimized based on buckling calculations.

Further optimization of Rib is possible.

--Varying number of Ribs and spacing of Ribs.

Use of other materials for the design of spars can be thought of.

Detail stress analysis of individual components and its validation with

(46)
(47)

Taking values from NACA Standards

At Root: Profile: NACA 64A

1

215.

Leading Edge radius = 1.556% c.

Slope of mean line at leading edge = 0.0842.

At Tip: Profile: NACA 64A

1

210.

Leading Edge radius = 0.701% c.

Slope of mean line at leading edge = 0.0842.

(48)
(49)

INCORPORATING THE LEADING EDGE RADIUS AS

SPECIFIED IN THE PROFILE STANDARD.

1.Giving the slope in the

sketcher

mode

2.Creating the arc of the

required

dimension coming

out of sketcher.

(50)

Using the connect curve option to join the leading edge radius

and the aerofoil profile.

Create the surface using multi section

(51)

INTERSECTION OF THE PROFILES

Creating the planes at the four sections at ½, ¼, ¾ of the span of the wing.

(52)

ANGLE OF ATTACK

Create a point at the quarter chord and draw a line for reference.

Rotate the intersected profiles as 0.6

0

at the quarter, 1.1

0

at mid span, 1.6

0

at three

(53)

By considering the profiles generated with angle of attack at different sections,

the wing surface is created using multi-section surface option.

CREATE THE SURFACE USING MULTI SECTION

SURFACE OPTION

(54)

CREATION OF REFERENCE AEROFOIL SECTIONS

15 planes are created at rib positions along the wing span.

(55)

CONSIDERATIONS MADE

DURING THE DESIGN OF SPAR

ELEMENTS

The maintenance of the nose box is made easy.

The front spar is I – section.

The rear spar is C – section.

(56)

DESIGNING OF SPAR ON

MANUFACTURING BASIS

The front spar is placed at 25% of chord length from leading edge.

The rear spar is placed at 62% of chord length from leading edge.

Thicknesses of the flanges and webs are different.

The flanges are made of T-sections and L- sections.

The webs are made with sheet metal.

The thicknesses are optimized based on the availability of the standard gages of sheet metal.

The final assembly of elements can be fastened with rivets.

(57)

CROSS SECTION SPAR

Skin area, A

s

= (b +2*20*t

s

) mm

2

(58)

Rib no.

Dist. From root Flange Width Skin Area Available area Flange Thickness Effective Flange areaWeb thickness

From root

(mm)

(mm)

(mm)

(mm)

1

Root 0

70

220

266.94

3.81

266.94

1.63

2

300

70

220

215

3.07

215

1.63

3

600

70

220

175

2.5

175

1.63

4

900

65

210

150

2.31

150

1.29

5

1210

65

155.2

144.9

2.23

144.9

1.29

6

1520

60

147.2

116.4

2

120

1.29

7

1830

60

147.2

86.4

2

120

1.29

8

2150

55

139.2

60.4

2

110

0.91

9

2470

50

88.8

55.6

2

100

0.91

10

2790

45

82.8

36.1

2

90

0.91

11

3120

40

76.8

16.6

2

80

0.64

12

3450

35

70.8

-0.4

2

70

0.64

13

3780

30

64.8

-12.4

2

60

0.64

14

4110

30

64.8

-19.9

2

60

0.64

15

4440

30

64.8

-24.9

2

60

0.64

16

NO RIB 4750

(mm

2

)

(mm

2

)

(mm

2

)

(59)

REAR SPAR DIMENSIONS

Rib no. Dis t. F rom root

F lange W idthS k in A rea A vailable areaF lange Thic k nes s

E ffec tive F lange area

W eb thic k nes s

F rom root

(m m )

(m m )

(m m )

(m m )

1

Root 0

90

260

415.01

4.61

415.01

1.45

2

300

90

260

340

3.78

340

1.45

3

600

80

240

295

3.69

295

1.45

4

900

75

230

257.5

3.43

257.5

1.15

5

1210

70

204

223

3.19

223

1.15

6

1520

65

194

180.5

2.78

180.5

1.15

7

1830

60

184

138

2.3

138

1.15

8

2150

55

174

100.5

2

110

0.91

9

2470

50

148

73.5

2

100

0.91

10

2790

45

138

48.5

2

90

0.91

11

3120

40

128

21

2

80

0.64

12

3450

35

118

4

2

70

0.64

13

3780

30

108

-19

2

60

0.64

14

4110

30

108

-36.5

2

60

0.64

(m m

2

)

(m m

2

)

(m m

2

)

(60)

CREATION OF THE SPAR SECTIONS

1. Two T sections for the flange, and web section for the front spar.

2. Two L sections for the flange, and web section for the rear spar.

(61)

GENERATING SPAR USING

DIFFERENT SECTIONS

(62)

CRIMP HOLES OR LIGHTENING HOLES

The lightening holes are made in the element in order to reduce the weight of the

element. the crimp holes are made to the web element of the spar. These holes

provided in between the two successive rib locations.

(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1] Abbot & Albert,'Theory of wing sections',Dover publication,1949.

2] David J. Perry,'Aircraft structures',Mc-Graw Hill publication,1950.

3] E. F. Bruhn,'Analysis and design of flight vehicle structures',1973.

4] Michael C. Y. Niu, 'Airframe Stress Analysis and Sizing', 2001.

5] Michael C. Y. Niu, 'Airframe structural design', Conmilit press Ltd., 1989.

6] Kuethe and Schetzer, 'Foundations of Aerodynamics', 2nd Edition, John Wiley

and Sons, New York, 1959.

7] ASM Material Data Sheet

8] MIL Handbook.

&

(67)

THANK YOU

CADES Digitech Pvt. Ltd

.

Tel: +91 80 4193 9000

Fax: +91 80 4193 9099

URL: www.cadestech.com

References

Related documents

At 3.06˚ wing incidence angle, this simulation is to highlight the fuselage surface pressure variations at the interference region for preliminary aircraft design

On the basis of the dihedral angle allows, after a gust of wind that lowers one wing, this will be submitted to the action of air at a higher angle of attack,

angle of attack. for all winglet and rectangular wing models at velocity of 40, 45 and 50 m/s respectively.. Figure 4 shows the elliptical winglet with cant angle of 45 degree

The velocity contours in the wake region behind the rectangular wing showed that velocity defect had an augmentation, therefore the angle of attack increased at low

As shown in Figure 7, for the mid- canard conguration case, higher suction is achieved at low to moderate angles of attack, and at high angles of attack, at most sections of the

The maximum lift on the cropped delta wing under the supersonic flow and subsonic flow are similar at 15 degrees angle of attack. There is a possibility of using

The lift to drag ratio increases as the angle of attack increased on both wings, for rear wing the lift to drag ratio is reduced when compared to that of front wing due to

This is an experimental study considering the change the lift, lift coefficient, zero-lift angle of attack, and stalling angle of attack of a wing with a NACA 2412 airfoil and a