•
1)
Identification of
semicrystalline polymers and Recognition of
crystalline phases (polymorphism) of polymers
•
2)Polymers are never 100% crystalline. XRD is a primary technique
to determine the degree of crystallinity
in polymers.
•
3) Microstructure: Crystallite size in polymers is usually on the
nano-scale in the thickness direction. The size of crystallites can be
determined using variants of the Scherrer equation.
•
4) Orientation: Polymers, due to their long chain structure, are highly
susceptible to orientation. XRD is a primary tool for the
determination of crystalline orientation through the Hermans
orientation function.
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 200 2θ = 23.9° I 2θ (deg) PE polyethylene 110 2θ = 21.4°
1) Identification of semicrystalline polymers
Positions and Intensities of the peaks are used for identifying the material.
hkl hkl
D
tan
R
=
2
θ
The diffraction of unoriented samples in
transmission by using a flat film is characterized by concentric circles called “Debye Scherrer Rings”
Unoriented PE
200 (2θθθθ=23.9°)
110 (2θθθθ=21.4°)
The diffraction of unoriented samples in reflection
X ray diffraction of semicrystalline and amorphous
polymer
5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
400 310 210 220 211 (20.3°) 300 (11.8°)I
2θ (deg)
110 (6.2°)s-PS
syndiotattic
polystyrene
5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
I
2
θ(deg)
s-PS syndiotactic polystyreneamorphous
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 _ _ 030 220 _ 421 _ 322 _ 421 420 040 410 002 040 _ 111 _ 111 _ 101 _ 041 031 020 200 510 600 410 400 210 310 210 210 010 010 132 131 030 220 200 210 211 220 300 110 I n te n si ty α αα α δδδδDCE γγγγ δδδδ 2θ (deg) _ 410 _ 321 301 302 230 121 401 231 331 _ 112 102 210 020 _ 121 111 _ 301 _ 321 211 230 121 212 _ 322 302 411 411 210 020 111 s-PS
Position and Relative intensities are the fingerprint of crystalline phases of polymer
1) Identification of crystalline phases of polymers
a b
αααα
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 T = 280 °Cmax T = 290 °Cmax T = 300 °Cmax T = 310 °Cmax T = 320 °Cmax t = 5 minmax β β β α β + α β β β β β α α α α α e d c b a In te n si ty 2ϑ (deg) s-PS
Identification of
crystalline phases of polymers also if they are present in mixture
.
5 10 15 20 25 30 Forma I + II Forma I + II Forma II
I
2
θ(deg)
Forma I (110)I (300)I (211)I (220)I (200)II (220)II (311)IIi-PB
X ray diffraction of semicrystalline polymer and inorganic
compound
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 400 310 210 220 211 (20.3°) 300 (11.8°) I 2θ (deg) 110 (6.2°) s-PS syndiotattic polystyrene inorganic compound Polymer 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 I 2 θ (deg) KBr5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 18.6 59.3 48.7 38.5 28.6 25.6 21.6 19 17 14.1 9.5
In
te
n
s
it
y
(
a
.u
.)
2
θ(°)
polimero
Carica inorganica
Diffrazione dei raggi X del campione prima TGA
• amorphous / crystalline
• (polymer, inorganic/organic compound)
• crystalline phases
The
peak positions, intensities, widths and shapes
provide important information about the structure of the
material
degree of crystallinity :
x
c
amorphous e crystallin e crystallinI
I
I
x
c+
=
2)XRD
a primary technique to determine the
degree of crystallinity
in polymers.
The determination of the degree of crystallinity implies use of a two-phase model, i.e. the sample is composed of crystals and amorphous and no regions of semi-crystalline organization.
amorphous
e
crystallin
I
I
I
=
+
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 I 2θThe diffraction profile is divided in 2 parts: peaks are related to diffraction of crystallites, broad alone is related to scattering of amorphous phase.
am cr cr
KA
A
A
x
c+
=
K is a constant related to the different scattering factors of crystalline and
amorphous phases. For relative measures K = 1.
PE
I
a=
diffracted
intensity
of
amorphous phase
I
b=
diffracted
intensity
of
background
I
c=
diffracted
intensity
of
crystalline phase
Ic Ia I bThe assumption is that the areas are proportional to the
scattering intensities of crystalline and amorphous phases
5 10 15 20 25 30 In te n si ty 2θ (deg) 5 10 15 20 25 30 2θ(deg) In te n si ty
The half-width of peaks is related to crystallite dimensions.
Contribution to broadening can be due to
lattice distortion, structural disorder as well as instrumental effects.
Half-width large correspond to smaller crystallites
3) Microstructure
:
Crystallite size in polymers
B =
∆
2
θ
= 2
θ
2– 2
θ
12θ (deg)
β
= B
−
b
b = broadening instrumental
β
= broadening due to crystallites dimensions
B =
half-width of peaks In te n si ty Imax Imax/2 2θ2 2θ1 B 2θCrystallite size in polymers :
cos
θ
λ
⋅
β
=
K
L
hkl
Scherrer’s Equation
Lhkl = crystallite dimensions (in Å) along the direction perpendicular to the crystallographic plane hkl.
β = half-width of peak related to the crystallographic plane hkl (rad).
K = constant (usually K = 0.89)
θ = diffraction angle of the hkl reflection.
λ = wavelength used ( λCukα = 1.5418 Å.)
b can be measured by the half-width of a peak
of crystalline compounds low molecular weight.
4)Orientation
: Polymers, due to their long chain structure,are highly susceptible to orientation Draw direction c fiber X-ray Fiber axesX-ray diffraction of oriented polymer: fiber pattern
equator l=0 (hk0) First layer l=1 (hk1) Second layer l=2 (hk2) i-PP fiber))
/
(
(
λ
1-R
y
tan
sen
c
=
l
c = periodicity along the chain axes
λλλλ = wavelength used (CuKαααα = 1.5418 Å)
l l l
l = layer
x, y = distance of reflections from the center
along equatorial and meridian lines
R = chamber radius meridian y x π = θ R y tan cos R x cos cos -1 2 360 2
Distance from layers correspond to c axes
X-ray diffraction of fibers annealed at different T
Trans-planar conformation
c=5.1Å
Helical
conformation
c=7.8 Å
ε= 50 % ε= 100 % ε= 200 % ε= 500 %
Oriented sPP fiber stretched at different
ε
ε
=100(Lf-Li)/Li
Lf = final length Li = initial length
First layer l=1 (hk1)
Azimutal scan: measuring the intensity at 2θconstant, by varying the χ angle.
If
χ
= 0 for meridian reflection (00
l
)
<cos
2φ
00l
> = 1 e f
c=
1
The fiber is perfected oriented: f
c= 1
Orientation with respect to draw direction
parameter parallel random perpendicular <cos2φ> f 1 1 1/3 0 0 -1/2
The degree of orientation can be determined from the intensity distribution of the corresponding diffraction on the Debye ring
by using the Hermans’ Orientation Function
(
3
1
)
2
1
2−
=
φ
φcos
f
Z = draw axes a b c φa,Z φb,Z φc,Z χ 2 χ( )
χ χ χ χ χ χ χ >= χ < χ = φ∫
∫
π π d ) I( d 2 / 0 2 / 0 2 2 2 2 sen cos sen I cos cos cos hkl hkl hklIf the radiation is perpendicular to the fiber axes
Average cosine squared value of φ angle
Types of ORIENTATION GEOMETRY (Heffelfinger
& Burton)1 PREFERRED ORIENTATION
Crystallographic elements
Reference elements
1 Random - -
-2 Axial Crystallographic Axes parallel
to reference axes c draw axes 3 Planar Crystallographic Axes on a
reference plane c film plane 4 Planar-axial Crystallographic plane
Parallel to a reference axes (100) draw axes 5 Uniplanar Crystallographic plane
Parallel to a a reference plane (100) film plane
6
Uniplanar-axial
Crystallographic Axes parallel to reference axes
and a Crystallographic plane Parallel to a a reference plane
c
(100)
draw axes
film plane
C. J. Heffelfinger, R. L. Burton J. Polym. Sci. 47, 289 (1960).
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 DCE clathrate δδδδ γγγγ ββββ α αα α 240 101 150 D C B A E 170 111 060 130 040 110 020 030 210 I n te n si ty 040 Figure 2 2θ (deg) 111 020 020 010 010 040 410 030 020 600 211 β 410 400 220 300 200 110 β 230 _ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 DCE clathrate δδδδ γγγγ ββββ '' α αα α '' 131 041 240 150 101 002 170 111 060 140 130 120 040 110 020 A B C D E 411 _ 321 _ 230 _ 030 410 002 Figure 1 040 _ 041 031 020 β 200 510 600 410 400 210 310 β 210 210 010 010 132 131 030 220 200 210 211 220 300 110 I n te n si ty 2θ (deg) 121 401 231 331 020 210 020 111 _ 111 302 111 _ 111 _ 411 322 _ 321 _ 420 040 410 _ _
end edge through Through direction Edge direction End direction MD TD
Types of Orientation in polymers
010
Uniplanar orientation : (010)
Rizzo, Lamberti, Albunia, Ruiz de Ballesteros, Guerra Macromol. 2002, 35, 5854 Albunia, Rizzo, Guerra Chem. Mat. 2009, 21,3370
010 planes
8.70Å
Film surface
Along the chain projections of packing of
δ
forms of
s-PS showing (010) planes parallel to the film surface
(010) planes correspond to rows of parallel helices with minimum
interchain distances (8.70Å) and maximum interplanar distances
(10.56Å)
s-PS co-crystals
Chatani, Y.; Shimane, Y.; Inagaki, T.; Ijitsu, T.; Yukinari, T.; Shikuma, H. Polymer, 1993, 34, 1620.
De Rosa, C.; Rizzo, P.; Ruiz de Ballesteros, O.; Petraccone, V.; Guerra G. Polymer, 1999, 40, 2103.
c a 0.87 nm R L a/2
a
c
b
L L R RUnique feature of s-PS:
three uniplanar orientations
a
c
b
L L R RSolution casting; Spin-coating
Solvent induced crystallization
on amorphous film
THF, CHCl3
Rizzo, Lamberti, Albunia, Ruiz, Guerra
Macromolecules 2002, 35, 5854
p-xylene, dichloroethane Rizzo, Costabile, Guerra
Macromolecules 2004, 37, 3071
Bp > 140°C
Rizzo, Spatola, Del Mauro, Guerra
Macromolecules 2005, 38, 10089
Bp < 110°C
Rizzo, Della Guardia, Guerra
Macromolecules 2004, 37, 8043
Film thickness
a
//
c
//
a
//
c
⊥
a
⊥
c
//
Albunia, Rizzo, Tarallo, Petraccone, Guerra Macromolecules 2008, 41, 8632
biaxial stretch 2.5x2.5 D1 D2 L M R I E E E E
sPS Films
: Orientation Upon Biaxial Balanced Drawing
Paola Rizzo*, Alexandra R. Albunia Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 2011, 212,1419-26
c
a
a
//
c
//
010 planes 8.70Å Film surfacea// c// planes
correspond to rows of parallel helices with minimum interchain distances (8.70Å) and maximum interplanar distances (10.56Å)a
//c
//Planes(PET)
polyethylene terephthalate
biaxial stretch 2.5x2.5 D1 D2 L M R I E E E EBin, Y.; Oishi,K.; Yoshida, K.; Nakashima T.; Matsuo, M.; J. Polymer, 2004, 36,394-402
(a=4.56Å b=5.94Å c=10.75Å
α
=98.5° β=118° γ=112°) triclinic lattice(100)
uniplanar orientationUniplanar orientation
A
crystalline plane
preferentially
parallel to the film plane
Primary slip-plane:
-
containing the chain axis
- and having the
highest density
Paola Rizzo, Vincenzo Venditto, Gaetano Guerra, Antonio Vecchione Macromolecular Symposia 2002, 185, 53-63.
(i-PP) polypropylene biaxial stretch 2.5x2.5 D1 D2 L M R I E E E E
ND
MD
TD
TD MD MDA
B
C
(i-PP) polypropylenePaola Rizzo, Vincenzo Venditto, Gaetano Guerra, Antonio Vecchione Macromolecular Symposia 2002, 185, 53-63.
Uniplanar orientation
biaxial stretch 2.5x2.5 D1 D2 L M R I E E E EIn the Schulz reflection method the goniometer is set at the Bragg angle
corresponding to the crystallographic planes of interest. A special specimen holder tilted the sample with the horizontal axis (y rotation axis), while rotating it in its own plane about an axis normal to its surface (j rotation axis) . The y rotation can be varied from 0°to 90°, whereas the j rotation can be varied from 0°to 360°. The pole figures are plotted on a polar stereographic projection using linear intensity scale.
(i-PP) polypropylene
Uniplanar orientation
biaxial stretch 2.5x2.5 D1 D2 L M R I E E E EPaola Rizzo, Vincenzo Venditto, Gaetano Guerra, Antonio Vecchione Macromolecular Symposia 2002, 185, 53-63.
Iso-intensity lines indicate the relative
intensity of the pole related to the maximum diffracted intensity (assumed equal to 10).
The presence on the diffraction rings of the pole figures of the (110) and (130) reflection of intensity maxima along MD indicates some preferential c-axis orientation along TD. It is worth noting that this minor axial orientation, which is related to a not perfect
ND
MD
TD
TD MD MDA
B
C
Paola Rizzo, Vincenzo Venditto, Gaetano Guerra, Antonio Vecchione Macromolecular Symposia 2002, 185, 53-63.
Paola Rizzo, Vincenzo Venditto, Gaetano Guerra, Antonio Vecchione Macromolecular Symposia 2002, 185, 53-63.
iPP:uniplanar-axial orientation
The pole figure of the (040) reflection shows a strong maximum in ND. Correspondingly, the (110) and (130) pole figures show rings at latitude 72° and 46°, respectively.
These rings present more intense maxima along MD and less intense maxima along TD, indicate the occurrence of a bimodal axial orientation, with prevailing orientation along TD.
Crystallites presenting (110) planes parallel to the film surface, associated with a c-axis orientation along TD, can account for the two weak reflections at latitude of 72° along
Paola Rizzo, Vincenzo Venditto, Gaetano Guerra, Antonio Vecchione Macromolecular Symposia 2002, 185, 53-63.
iPP:uniplanar-axial orientation
The bimodal axial orientation, associated with a major uniplanar orientation relative to the (0k0) planes and minor uniplanar orientations relative to the (110) and (130) planes, can rationalize all the diffraction
peaks which occur in photographic patterns, like those shown previously
(PE)
polyethylene
a-axis (200) is preferentially oriented along the MD
Chen, H. Y.; Bishop, M. T.; Landes, B. G.; Chum, S. P.; J. App. Polym. Sci., 2006, 101, 898-907
Blown film of PE
It is evident that the a-axis (200) is preferentially oriented along the MD, because
poles with highest intensity are concentrated at the north and south ends of the (200) pole figure.
In the (020) pole figure, poles with the highest intensity are concentrated in the center, and spread along the TD. This suggests that b-axis is oriented in the ND-TD plane.