• No results found

Open Quantum Systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Open Quantum Systems"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Laurent Sanchez-Palencia

Center for Theoretical Physics

Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, Institut Polytechnique de Paris F-91128 Palaiseau, France

Open Quantum Systems

(2)

Probable Programme

1. Introduction to open quantum systems

1.1 Position of the problem 1.2 Simple approaches

1.3 The density operator (reminder ... or not)

2. Master equation : The statistical physics approach

2.1 Formal derivation of the master equation

2.2 Statistical equilibrium : The damped harmonic oscillator 2.3 Driven systems : The Optical Bloch equations

3. The quantum information approach

3.1 Kraus operators

3.2 Lindblad form of the master equation

3.2 Quantum jumps and stochastic wavefunctions

(3)

Lecture 2 at a Glance

Formal derivation of the quantum master equation

Density operator formalism

Main assumptions :

bath / reservoir / environment (B) system (S)

S⊗B(0)=^ρS(0)⊗^ρB(0)

(i) S⊗B is isolated with

(ii) B weakly affected from the point of view of S, ie S always « sees the same bath »

Elimination of the bath B dynamics

d ^ρS dt = 1

i ℏ

[

H^ S(t ), ^ρS(t )

]

1

2

0

d τ TrB

[

H^ I(t ),

[

H^ I(t−τ) , ^ρS(t )⊗ ^ρB(0)

] ]

S⊗B(t )→ ^ρS(t )⊗^ρB(t)

(iii) Separation of time scales : (« weak coupling ») → Markov process

Γ,Δ ≪ωS∼ω

(4)

Lecture 2 at a Glance

Application to the damped

harmonic oscillator

bath / reservoir /

environment (B)

∣0 

∣1 

∣2 

d ^ρS dt = 1

i ℏ

[

H^ S' , ^ρS

]

+ ℒ'[S]

'[S]=(Γ+ Γ')

(

c ^ρ^ Sc^12 Sc^c−^ 1

2 c^c ^ρ^ S

)

'

(

c^Sc−^ 12 Sc ^c^ 1

2 c ^c^ S

)

with

Physical content Explicit form

accounts for « spontaneous emission » terms Γ

accounts for « stimulated emission and absorption » terms Γ'=⟨ NS)⟩BE

Dynamics

(5)

Probable Programme

1. Introduction to open quantum systems

1.1 Position of the problem 1.2 Simple approaches

1.3 The density operator (reminder ... or not)

2. Master equation : The statistical physics approach

2.1 Formal derivation of the master equation

2.2 Statistical equilibrium : The damped harmonic oscillator 2.3 Driven systems : The Optical Bloch equations

3. The quantum information approach

3.1 Kraus operators

3.2 Lindblad form of the master equation

3.2 Quantum jumps and stochastic wavefunctions

4. Decoherence, entanglement, and control

(6)

Driven systems : The optical Bloch equation

Atom coupled to the radiation field

Elements of quantum electrodynamics

Atom at rest in a radiation field

Atom coupled to the radiation field seen as a driven open quantum system ; Optical Bloch equations ; Solutions in simple cases

Atom moving in a laser field

Emergence of radiative forces ; Radiation pressure and dipole force ; Application to laser control of atomic gases

(7)

Quantum Electrodynamics

Atom-field interaction

Electric dipole approximation :

H^ R=

ℏ ω(^b

b^+1/2)

V^ AR=− ^⃗D⋅^⃗E( ⃗R)

Atom-laser interaction (driving)

Electric dipole approximation : V^ AL=−D⋅⃗E^⃗ L( ⃗R , t )

Rabi frequency :

δ=ωL−ωA

ΩL( ⃗R)=

|

d⋅⃗L( ⃗R )

|

/ ℏ

φL( ⃗R )=arg

[

d⋅⃗L( ⃗R)

]

+ π

Phase : Detuning :

The optical Bloch equations (OBE) describe the evolution of the internal degrees of freedom of an atom coupled to the quantized radiation field (spontaneous emission) and to a laser field (classical)

∣e 

∣g  ℏ ωA

ℏ Γ

ℏ ωL ℏ δ H = ^^ HA+ ^HR+ ^VAR+ ^VAL

spont.

emission

May be represented in the vacuum :∣ψ R=∣0 

Responsible for spontaneous emission

H^ A=ℏ ωA∣e  〈 e∣

Atom (A) and electromagnetic field (bath B)

(8)

Driven systems : The optical Bloch equation

Atom coupled to the radiation field

Elements of quantum electrodynamics

Atom at rest in a radiation field

Atom coupled to the radiation field seen as a driven open quantum system ; Optical Bloch equations ; Solutions in simple cases

Atom moving in a laser field

Emergence of radiative forces ; Radiation pressure and dipole force ; Application to laser control of atomic gases

(9)

Optical Bloch Equations

d ~ρge

dt = −

(

Γ2 +i δ

)

~ρge−iΩL(ρee−1/2)

d ~ρeg

dt = −

(

Γ2 −i δ

)

~ρeg+L(ρee−1/2)

d ρee

dt = −Γ ρee+iΩL

2 (~ρeg−~ρge)mmmi

The quantum master equation is derived as for the damped harmonic oscillator (see lecture 2), up to the substitution

ρgg=1−ρee

~ρge≡ρgeexp [i(φL−ωLt)]1 2 c→ ^σ^ -=∣g ⟩ 〈 e∣

c^→ ^σ+=∣e ⟩ 〈 g∣

N.B. : In the derivation of the QME, we have never used any commutation rule of and , so we need not care about the fact that they are not preserved under the substituion above.

c^ c^

It yields , ied ^ρ

dt = 1

i ℏ

[

H^ A+ ^VAL(t), ^ρ

]

(

σ^- ^ρ ^σ+12ρ ^^σ+σ^-12 σ^+ -

)

with , and is included in the

definition of . Here .

Δ

ωA δ=ωL−ωA

provided (hierarchy of time scales).ΩL, Γ , δ≪ωA∼ωL

(10)

One finds a relaxation of both the populations and the coherences (population transfer from to ) :

d ~ρge

dt = − Γ

2 ~ρge d ~ρeg

dt = − Γ

2 ~ρeg d ρee

dt = −Γ ρeei

~ρge(t) = e−Γt /2~ρge(0) ρee(t ) = e−Γtρee(0) ρ (t) = 1−e−Γtρ (0)

Non driven case

In the absence of a laser, ΩL=0, the OBE reduce to

Here, we have (ΩL=0 et δ=0)

Solutions of the Optical Bloch Equations

∣e 

∣g 

Γ

∣e 

∣g 

~ρge≡ρgeexp (−i ωAt)1 2

~ρeg≡ρegexp(+i ωAt)1 2

(11)

Solutions of the Optical Bloch Equations

One find a stationary term ( ) and two oscillating terms at the angular frequencies

d ~ρge

dt = −i δ~ρge−i ΩL(ρee−1/2)

d ~ρeg

dt = +i δ~ρeg+L(ρee−1/2)

d ρee

dt = +iΩL

2 (~ρeg−~ρge)mmmm ω0=0

ω=

Ω2L2

For an atom initially in the ground state , and , one finds ρgg(0)=1

∣g 

ρee(0)=ρge(0)=0

ρee(t)= ΩL2

ΩL22 sin2

( √

ΩL2+ δ2t /2

)

⇒ Rabi oscillations (for )t≾1/ Γ

Case without dissipation

In the case where the spontaneous emission can be neglected, Γ=0, the OBE reduce to

(12)

Solutions of the Optical Bloch Equations

General case : Resolution

To solve the OBE, it is worth using the variables

u(t) = Re(~ρge) = (~ρge+~ρeg)/2 v (t) = Im(~ρeg) = (~ρge−~ρeg)/2 i w (t) = ρee1/2

The OBE can then be cast into the matrix form d

dt

(

wuv

)

=−

(

Γ /+ δ02 −ΩΓ /−δ2 +ΩL Γ0 L

)

M

(

wuv

)

(

Γ /002

)

The solution read as

In the general case, for an atom at rest, one finds damped oscillations

(13)

Solutions of the Optical Bloch Equations

ρggst = 2+s

2(1+s) ρeest= s 2 (1+s)

~ρgest =δ+i Γ /2 ΩL

s

1+s ~ρegst =δ−i Γ /2 ΩL

s 1+s s= ΩL2/2

δ22/4

General case : Stationary solutions

The stationary solutions are found by inverting the matrix M :

wst=−1 2

1 ust= δ 1+s

ΩL s

1+s vst=Γ /2 ΩL

s 1+s

where is the staturation parameter

No population inversion, ρggst ⩾ρeest 1 2

In the large s limit, the stationary populations saturate to ρggst eest1/2 1 2

The coherences are non monotonous and slowly vanish for large s

Main properties

(14)

Solutions of the Optical Bloch Equations

ω / Γ

⇒ All the components of the density

γ0/ Γ γ1/ Γ γ2/ Γ

ΩL/ Γ

δ/ Γ δ/ Γ ΩL/ Γ δ/ Γ ΩL/ Γ

General case : Relaxation towards the stationary solutions

The dynamics towards the stationary state is given by the eigenvalues of M. There are two possible cases :

(i) The three eigenvalues are real :

(ii) One is real and the other two are complex conjugates :

u(t)=ust+A0e−γ0t+A1e−γ1t+A2e− γ2t

u(t)=ust+A0e−γ0t+A1e−γ1tcos(ωt +ϕ)

(15)

Driven systems : The optical Bloch equation

Atom coupled to the radiation field

Elements of quantum electrodynamics

Atom at rest in a radiation field

Atom coupled to the radiation field seen as a driven open quantum system ; Optical Bloch equations ; Solutions in simple cases

Atom moving in a laser field

Emergence of radiative forces ; Radiation pressure and dipole force ; Application to laser control of atomic gases

(16)

Application : Radiative Forces

Dynamics of an atom in a laser field

λL=2 π/ kL

λdB=

2 π ℏ2/m kBT

V

Hypotheses : (i) atom localized on a short size (classical motion),

(ii) internal state adiabatically follows the local laser field, λdB≪ λL

(p±Δ p) Γ1/m ≪λL

(17)

Application : Radiative Forces

Dynamics of an atom in a laser field

Within a semi-classical approach, if the atom is sufficiently slow, its internal states adiabatically adapts to the intensity and the phase of the laser locally, it is subjected to the force

F ( ⃗R )=−ℏ u

st∇ Ω L

Fdip

+ ℏ

vstΩL∇ φ L

FPR

with ΩL( ⃗R)=

|

d⋅⃗L( ⃗R )

|

/ ℏ

φL( ⃗R )=arg

[

d⋅⃗L(⃗R)

]

+ π

The dissipative part is significant for and if there is phase gradient, . This is the radiation pressure.

Γ≿δ FPR

∇ φ L0

The reactive part dominates for and if there is an intensity gradient, . It is the dipole force.

Γ ≪ δ

Fdip

∇ Ω L0

⇒ Basic tools for cooling and manipulating neutral atoms using lasers !

ust= δ ΩL

s

1+s vst=Γ /2 ΩL

s

, and 1+s

(18)

Radiation Pressure

Radiation pression : Dissipative part

The general form of the dissipative force is

FPR( ⃗R )=ℏ Γ s (⃗R)/2 1+s( ⃗R)

Πeeest

∇ φ L( ⃗R)

For a laser beam of wave vector (plane wave), one finds kL

E (⃗r , t )= L

2 exp

[

i

(

kL⋅⃗R−ωLt

) ]

+c.c

φL( ⃗R )=⃗k⋅⃗R +π

so

FPR=Γ Πe ℏ ⃗kL

and

average spontaneous Recoil taken by the

∣e 

∣g 

spontaneous photon ℏ ⃗kL

laser photon

P=⃗P0+ ℏ ⃗kL

P0 ℏ ⃗kL laser photon

stimulated emissionsion

δ ⃗P=0

δ ⃗P=ℏ ⃗k

(19)

Radiation Pressure

Radiation pressure and the tails of cometes

Dust tail

Yellow and wide

Pushed by the radiation pressure Curved due to dragging

Ion tail (plasma)

Blue and narrow

Created and pushed by the solar wind (also a plasma)

(20)

Radiation Pressure

Manipulation of atoms by lasers

Laser cooling by pairs of counter-propagating beams Zeeman slower

ℏ δ

∣e  ℏ δ'left

ℏ δ'right

∣e 

∣g 

(21)

Dipole Force

Dipole force : Reactive part

The dipole force is conservative, , and derives from the potential

Vdip(⃗R)=ℏ δ

2 ln

[

1+s( ⃗R)

]

For large detuning and weak intensity, (weak radiation pressure and weak saturation),

Fdip=− ⃗V dip

|δ|≫ Γ , ΩL

Vdip(⃗R)≃ℏ ΩL2 4 δ

∣e  ℏ δ<0

∣g 

ℏ δ>0

∣e 

∣g 

Repulsive potential

(δ>0 ; « blue detuning »)

→ barrier

Attractive potential

(δ<0 ; « red detuning »)

→ optical trap

(22)

Dipole Force

Controlled trapping potentials for quantum simulation

Periodic potentials and optical lattices Holographic traps

Disordered potentials

(23)

Lecture 3 Quantum information approach

mercredi 11 décembre 2019 21:15

References

Related documents

The consequence of this work is that the Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony (ZKBBM) equation and the good Boussinesq equations are considered to construct new

• ASTM F3347: Standard Specification for Metal Press Insert Fittings with Factory Assembled Stainless Steel Press Sleeve for SDR9 Cross-linked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing. •

The unintegrated (transverse momentum dependent) di ff ractive parton distributions in proton are calculated with the help of the Kimber-Martin-Ryskin prescription where collinear di

To overcome the privacy issue in data disclosure this paper we use a Key Distribution-Less Privacy Preserving Data Mining (KDLPPDM) [1] system in which the

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for an unsuccessful treatment outcome in servicemen with CECS who were treated with a rehabilitation program at a military

The associated factors were workload (work hours per week, break times during the work day), occupational factors (bending the trunk frequently, heavy or awkward lifting, bending

into Network Protection”, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, Volume 9, Issue. 8, pp 1278 - 1287,

The main aim of this paper is to investigate the dynamic determinants of money demand function, developed and by Bae and De Jon (2005) but based on Keynesian liquidity