Preferences and utility: the classical approach
Expected Utility Preferences versus Prospect Theory Preferences in Bargaining
27
Expected Utility Preferences versus Prospect Theory Preferences in Bargaining
27
On the Utility Function Representability of Lexicographic Preferences
16
Eliciting Utility for (Non)Expected Utility Preferences Using Invariance Transformations
24
Preferences for Shifts in Probabilities and Expected Utility Theory
11
Expected utility preferences for contingent claims and lotteries
27
Efficient Utility Functions for Ceteris Paribus Preferences
6
Consistent dynamic choice and non-expected utility preferences
15
Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.
10
Representing Risk Preferences in Expected Utility Based Decision Models
21
The core with random utility and interdependent preferences: Theory and experimental evidence
28
Tuned risk aversion as interpretation of non-expected utility preferences
32
Risk Preferences Beyond Expected Utility Theory: Theoretical and Experimental Approaches
203
Lesson 2. Preferences and Utility 1. Lesson 2 Preferences and Utility. c 2010, 2011 Roberto Serrano and Allan M. Feldman All rights reserved Version C
24
Imprecise swing weighting for multi-attribute utility elicitation based on partial preferences.
13
Preference intensity in MCDM when an additive utility function represents DM preferences
6
On Risk Aversion, Classical Demand Theory, and KM Preferences
39
On Risk Aversion, Classical Demand Theory, and KM Preferences
24
The Classical approach to distribution and the “natural system”
21
The utility of the voting power approach
15