• No results found

[PDF] Top 20 Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank 3 0

Has 10000 "Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank 3 0" found on our website. Below are the top 20 most common "Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank 3 0".

Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank 3 0

Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank 3 0

... The Prague discourse label set was inspired by the Penn sense tag hierarchy (Prasad et ...the discourse arrow. Within the four classes, the types of relations partly differ from the Penn ... See full document

5

Secondary Connectives in the Prague Dependency Treebank

Secondary Connectives in the Prague Dependency Treebank

... signaling discourse relations – from one-word, frozen conjunctions like a “and” or ale “but” to multiword phrases like stru č n ě ř e č eno “simply speaking”, vzhledem k této situaci “considering this ... See full document

9

Verbs of Saying with a Textual Connecting Function in the Prague Discourse Treebank

Verbs of Saying with a Textual Connecting Function in the Prague Discourse Treebank

... the discourse relation is between the two phrases of saying introducing (in)direct speech (see section ...only discourse relations between verbal arguments) and only provides these examples with the ... See full document

6

Use of Coreference in Automatic Searching for Multiword Discourse Markers in the Prague Dependency Treebank

Use of Coreference in Automatic Searching for Multiword Discourse Markers in the Prague Dependency Treebank

... the discourse relation – e.g. the example (3) demonstrates that it is the expression be- cause of (kvůli) that signals a relation of reason and result and therefore the preposition is also the fixed part of ... See full document

9

A Machine Learning Approach to Automatic Functor Assignment in the Prague Dependency Treebank

A Machine Learning Approach to Automatic Functor Assignment in the Prague Dependency Treebank

... An important feature of C5.0 is its mechanism to con- vert trees into collections of rules called rulesets. Rulesets are generally easier to understand than trees since each rule describes a specific context associated ... See full document

8

SciDTB: Discourse Dependency TreeBank for Scientific Abstracts

SciDTB: Discourse Dependency TreeBank for Scientific Abstracts

... in Treebank One advantage of dependency trees is that they can represent non- projective ...non-projective dependency trees, which account for about 3% of the whole ...our treebank is ... See full document

6

The Universal Dependencies Treebank for Slovenian

The Universal Dependencies Treebank for Slovenian

... 2 Dependency Treebanks for Slovenian The Slovenian UD Treebank represents the third generation of syntactically annotated corpora in ...dency Treebank (Dˇzeroski et al., 2006), based on the ... See full document

6

Announcing Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank 2.0

Announcing Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank 2.0

... One of the ideas with the tectogrammatical representation is that it emphasizes the similarities between different lan- guages and moderates the differences. The tectogrammat- ical representations of a sentence in a ... See full document

8

Enriching the Venice Italian Treebank with Dependency and Grammatical Relations

Enriching the Venice Italian Treebank with Dependency and Grammatical Relations

... The final step in the overall conversion is the assignment of Grammatical Relation labels/roles to each head. While this kind of conversion is quite straightforward in languages like English, which imposes strict ... See full document

5

How Dependency Trees and Tectogrammatics Help Annotating Coreference and Bridging Relations in Prague Dependency Treebank

How Dependency Trees and Tectogrammatics Help Annotating Coreference and Bridging Relations in Prague Dependency Treebank

... the dependency structure of the text representation but are present in the tectogrammatical level of the Prague Dependency Treebank and are very useful for the consistent annotation of ... See full document

8

Coreference in Prague Czech English Dependency Treebank

Coreference in Prague Czech English Dependency Treebank

... All the annotations were produced by a group of human annotators, students of linguistics. Each text was anno- tated by one annotator; small parts of the data were an- notated in parallel by two annotators to measure the ... See full document

8

Generic noun phrases and annotation of coreference and bridging relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank

Generic noun phrases and annotation of coreference and bridging relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank

... Another relevant question is if generic ex- pressions referring to the same kind can be considered coreferent in the same sense as noun phrases with a specific reading. Ac- cording to Carlson’s (1980) and Lyons‘ (1999) ... See full document

9

Typical Cases of Annotators’ Disagreement in Discourse Annotations in Prague Dependency Treebank

Typical Cases of Annotators’ Disagreement in Discourse Annotations in Prague Dependency Treebank

... relation discourse arguments (separate clauses with an elided verb, as in 3a) if there is any modification that only applies to one of the coordination members and at the same time it is immediately dependent on ... See full document

5

Introducing the Prague Discourse Treebank 1 0

Introducing the Prague Discourse Treebank 1 0

... Bridging Relations In PDiT ...same discourse entity when the reference is not expressed by grammatical means alone, but also via ...phoric) relations are expressed by various lin- guistic means ... See full document

9

Prague Dependency Treebank 2 5 – a Revisited Version of PDT 2 0

Prague Dependency Treebank 2 5 – a Revisited Version of PDT 2 0

... The pitfall of this process can be demonstrated on the Chinese Treebank (Xue et al., 2010), whose development followed the Penn Treebank pattern. The additional layers of anno- tation follow the stand-off ... See full document

16

Annotators’ Certainty and Disagreements in Coreference and Bridging Annotation in Prague Dependency Treebank

Annotators’ Certainty and Disagreements in Coreference and Bridging Annotation in Prague Dependency Treebank

... bridging relations have been topics of active discussions during the last few ...identity” relations, where the discourse entities to which the noun phrases refer cannot be called coreferential in ... See full document

8

Genres in the Prague Discourse Treebank

Genres in the Prague Discourse Treebank

... Annotation of phenomena going beyond the sentence boundary is nowadays a well established field of corpus linguistics. There is an increasing number of corpora containing some type of discourse information (cf. ... See full document

7

From Sentence to Discourse: Building an Annotation Scheme for Discourse Based on Prague Dependency Treebank

From Sentence to Discourse: Building an Annotation Scheme for Discourse Based on Prague Dependency Treebank

... to discourse relations, we analyzed also, like the Penn Discourse Treebank does, separate lexical items in Czech that can be of use for the description of ...connective relations, i.e. ... See full document

7

Recognizing Implicit Discourse Relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank

Recognizing Implicit Discourse Relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank

... from dependency trees of the ...whole dependency tree, parts of a tree, or multiple trees, depending on the span of the ar- ...using dependency trees is that they encode additional information at the ... See full document

9

Annotation of Multiword Expressions in the Prague Dependency Treebank

Annotation of Multiword Expressions in the Prague Dependency Treebank

... (NE). 3 Treatment of NEs together with other MWEs is important, be- cause syntactic functions are more or less arbitrary inside a NE (consider an address with phone num- bers, ... See full document

6

Show all 10000 documents...

Related subjects