• No results found

Vol 6, Issue 9, December 2016 Page 195 received corpus-based instruction, but they were taught in traditional teaching methods for

In document Vol. 6, Issue 9, December 2016 (Page 195-197)

speech acts. After a semester, 15 sessions, a post test was administered. The results of the post tests were analyzed to see whether treatment had any impact or not.

5.2. Participants

The subjects of this study were students of English-Language institutes in Mazandaran province. They were selected from the target population of intermediate EFL learners. There was no age and sex limitation. The criterion for selection was an Oxford Placement Test (OPT) in which scores between 120-149 in four language skills were selected for the purpose of the this study based on OPT table. 60 participants, based on Krejcie and Morgan's table for random sample size (1970) with 95% confidence interval, were randomly selected and randomly divided into two experimental and two control groups, thirty in each group. The intermediate level was selected because they are familiar with grammatical concepts and they are cognitively ready to receive metacognitive instruction, do grammatical analysis and process speech act tasks.

5.3. Materials

The materials in the present study were of two types- those used in traditional classes and the ones used in corpus-based classes

5.3.1. In traditional classes, the students had several sources of authentic materials to observe and analyze speech act samples. They listened to audios, watched filmed scenes and reviewed their transcripts for the speech act of apology studied during the semester. The class also studied EFL textbooks taught in these institutes about American culture and communication in order to understand the cultural context that shapes how speech acts are performed. The approximate level of these textbooks, as defined by the publisher, was consistent among all eight books: intermediate to upper-intermediate.

5.3.2. In corpus based classes:

a. Corpus like Communicator that is called dialogue corpora, with Date and Dipper as its concondarcers, were used. These corpora are speech act- special and contain topics concerning speech act practice. It is a keyword-based parser and seems to be adequate for this first stage of parsing task. So for cool construction analysis keywords are used for providing information concerning speech acts. The validity and reliability of this corpora had been substantiated through a pilot study done on 4 students to make sure it is suitable for intermediate level students.

b. CARLA site was also be used as a source for exercises and practicing speech acts. This database contains bibliographic information for all publications and presentations that have come out of the projects at the Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. This work has been created by an interdisciplinary and intercollegiate working group of faculty from the University of Minnesota in the fields of second language acquisition, second language pedagogy, and other disciplines dealing with linguistic issues. This website offers information about speech acts and how they can be learned and taught. (www.iles.umn.edu/introspeechacts).

5.4.Instruments

Several instruments were employed in the present study:

5.4.1. As for the proficiency test, OPT test was employed. The test has been developed by the “Languages and Linguistic Faculty” members and therefore, enjoys the construct validity crucial to any developed test.

5.4.2. Krejcie and Morgan's table for random sample size (1970).

5.4.3. Two 20- item MDCT (multiple choice discourse completion test) for speech act apology and colligation as the pre-test and the other as the post test was used in this study. So the reliability and validity of these tests is confirmed beforehand; all of these situations are adapted from the previous studies.

Vol. 6, Issue 9, December 2016 Page 196

5.4.4. Blum &kulkas' coding scheme (1997) for scoring apology DTC. Two criteria were used here for coding speech acts of apology through colligation: Conveying the illocutionary force and grammatical go-togetherness of speech act elements. It is called Mood derivable where the grammatical mood of locution and its colligation determine its illocutionary force.

5.4.5. Taggers like such as CLAWS (linguistics) and VOLSUNGA were also introduced. Also CLL-Tagger allows the user getting a text annotated with POS tags. It works on a well-known bi- directional inference algorithm according to which a POS tag is assigned to a token depending on POS tags of tokens to the right and to the left of current token. As a result CLL-Tagger works much faster than its immediate analogue, a tagger developed by the Japanese scientists (T&T tagger) that employs the same algorithm and also American National Corpus (ANC).

5.4.6. As alternatives to DATE and DIPPER Scheme for COMUNICATOR corpus, there are two commercially available corpus software, such as Wordsmith Tools (Scott, 1999) and Monoconc Pro (2000), which any average home computer user can manipulate with relative ease. They were also suggested and used for additional practice.

5.4.7. In addition devices like videos, audio containing situations containing interviews and meetings with celebrities, computers and internets were employed for the instruction.

5.5.Procedures

The subjects were selected from the target population of intermediate EFL learners. An Oxford Placement Test (OPT) was administered with 200 questions, fifty for each skill and 60 subjects with scores between 120 to 149 were selected for the purpose of this study and randomly assigned into two groups (i.e. experimental and control groups). A pre- test of MDTC was administered to determine their primary speech act knowledge. Then the treatment started and lasted for one semester, 15 sessions twice a week. Each treatment session lasted an hour and a half. The researcher started with Pre-presentation warming up, presentation explicit– metapragmatic instruction, Teacher-Fronted discussion of various meanings conveyed by an utterance, presenting socio-cultural contexts, linguistic knowledge, semantic and syntactic, formula and strategies that were needed to realize the intended speech act. Colligation was introduced and practiced in experimental group. The type of material was also different in which corpora were used in these classes. They were exposed to dialogues and different examples containing different forms of speech acts in different real life situations from dialogue corpora. The researcher explained what colligation is and some examples were shown through corpora. Taggers and concodancers were introduced. The subjects became familiar with their application and use. These applications were installed by the researcher beforehand. As an alternative, the way online corpora can be downloaded and practiced was also trained. The subjects were asked to find some examples of these speech acts and the co-occurrence of words with particular grammatical categories (Hoey, 2000, p. 234). Dialogue corpora is key word- based .The key words were given, and the speech acts used in different situation appeared on the screen. Then taggers analyzed then into grammatical categories. The subjects observed how, in frequent example, a special word can co-occur with a certain grammatical category. For each speech act, this was practiced separately. Dialogue corpora also exist online. The subjects can download and use it in this way. In the present study, this type of corpora was used when the subjects become proficient enough in determining part-of-speech later. After enough practicing through corpora, the students started working on the speech acts through role play because it is an integrated skill and all skill is practiced through it. Then some exercises taken from CARLA website were given to the subjects to see whether they were able to use and write the speech acts lexically and grammatically correct or not.

Vol. 6, Issue 9, December 2016 Page 197

In document Vol. 6, Issue 9, December 2016 (Page 195-197)

Outline

Related documents