0022-538X/90/052437-05$02.00/0
Copyright
©
1990,American Society for MicrobiologyRequirement for
a
Viral trans-Acting
Factor
Encoded
by
Brome
Mosaic Virus RNA-2 Provides Strong
Selection
In
Vivo
for
Functional
Recombinants
A. L. N. RAOAND TIMOTHY C. HALL*
Biology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station,
Texas77843-3258
Received 6 November 1989/Accepted 13 January 1990Interaction of specific
nucleotidesequenceswithtrans-actingproteins is intrinsictoreplication ofviralaswellas
eucaryotic
genomes.Brome
mosaicvirus RNA-2 encodesoneof
thetwoviral proteins knowntobeessential forreplication. (R.
French, M. Janda,
and P.Ahlquist, Science 231:1294-1297, 1986;
P. A.Kiberstis,
L.S.
Loesch-Fries,
andT.C.
Hall,Virology
112:804-808, 1981). Transfection of barley protoplasts with wild-typetranscripts of
bromemosaic virus RNA-1
andRNA-3
andserial dilutions of
RNA-2 transcriptspossessing
unaltered
coding
sequencesbut
bearing mutations
that greatlyincapacitated replication of
RNA-2 revealed that traceamountsof
RNA-2aresufficient
to supportreplication of theviralgenome. In sixreplicateexperimentscontaining
RNA-2transcripts devoid of
the3' 200
nucleotides that encompass the tRNA-like structurecontaining
theminus-strand
promoter,detectable
levelsof
progenyRNA-1
andRNA-3 and subgenomic RNA-4were present. This showed
that viral p2 protein
translatedfrom the supplied
RNA-2functioned
intrans to supportreplication
ofRNA-1
and RNA-3. However,
in twosimilar
experiments, progenyRNA-2
withelectrophoretic
mobility indistinguishable from that
ofwild-type
RNA-2 was seen at 24 hpostinoculation.
Northern
hybridization (RNA
blot) analysis confirmed the
presenceof
thetRNA-like 3'
terminus on these progenyRNAs,
indicating that recombinational
restorationof
thedeleted
sequencehadoccurred.Thissuggeststhat,
undercertain
circumstances,
RNArecombination
maybearapid and frequent
phenomenon.Considerable
insight into
thereplication
processesof
brome
mosaic virus (BMV) RNA has
been obtained through
functional analyses in vitro of transcripts of cDNA clones
containing
definedmutations in the3'
sequence commontoeach
of the viral RNA
components(3,
4). BMV RNA-1 and
RNA-2encode
proteins
laand
2a,
respectively, and
areknown to
be
necessaryfor viral
replication (8, 9).
Conse-quently, incorporation of mutations debilitating
one or moreof the
tRNA-like
functions
(aminoacylation, nucleotidyl
transferase, minus-strand
promoteractivity) into the RNA-2
sequence was
thought likely
tohave drastic effects
onreplication
of thiscomponentbutunlikely
toaffect
itsability
to betranslated
upon entryinto the
host cells. Using this
approach,
we substantiatedthe
ability of RNA-2
tobe
translated prior
toreplication
andshowed
thattrace amounts ofRNA-2 areeffective
insupporting
viralreplication.
Expression of replication-deficient
mutantsof
BMVRNA-2 inbarley
protoplasts.Capped full-length
transcripts
corre-sponding
toeachof the three
genomic
RNAsof
BMVweresynthesized
invitro by using
T7 RNApolymerase
(6).
Threemutations
(5'PsK, 5'+3'PsK, and Aknob) (Fig. 1)
presentonthe
cDNA
cloneof
BMVRNA-3 [pT7B3(-Tth)] (6)
wereintroduced
into afull-length cDNA clone of BMV
RNA-2(pT7B2) (6)
asHindIII-BamHI fragments (6, 17). Protoplasts
wereisolated
from 6-day-old barley plants
andtransfected in
the presence of
polyethylene glycol
(11)
with mixtures oftranscripts
containing wild-type
RNA-1 andRNA-3
andwild-type
or mutant RNA-2. Therelative
accumulationof
plus-
and minus-senseprogenyRNAswasstudied
by
North-ern(RNA) hybridization, using duplicate
blots and RNAprobes
of the desiredspecificity (6, 17). Transfection
ofbarley protoplasts
withwild-type
BMVgenomic RNA-1,
RNA-2,
andRNA-3 transcripts resulted
in the accumulation*Corresponding author.
ofprogeny
plus-
and minus-sense RNAs(Fig.
2a andb,
lanes1).
Inoculationscontaining
RNAtranscribedfrom 2/3tRNA-2,
a clonebearing
the 200 3'-terminal nucleotidesfrom
RNA-3,
showedwild-type
levelsof
infectivity, confirming
that thepresence of A insteadof G atposition 44(1)
inthe 2/3t RNA-2sequencehadnodetectableeffect
(Fig.
2a andb,
lanes2). In previous
studies(3, 4) Dreher
and Hall have characterizedtyrosylation,
adenylation,
andminus-strand
promoter functions invitro
of the threemutations
(Fig. 1)
that were introduced into RNA-2.(i) Mutation
5'PsKdis-rupts
base pairing
of the 3' aminoacid
acceptorstem;invitro
tyrosylation, adenylation,
and minus-strand promoter activ-itieswere0, <1,
and8% of thewild-type
activities,
respec-tively.
(ii) Mutation
5'+3'PsK restores basepairing
butintroduces
a transversion of threebases;
in vitro activitieswere
54, 282,
and 71% of thewild-type activities,
respec-tively.
(iii)
TheAknob mutation deletesasmall(4-base) loop
that iscommontotheputative
anticodonarmof several viral tRNA-like structures(3);
invitro activitieswere98, 8,
and6% of the
wild-type activities, respectively. Barley
proto-plasts
transfected with mixtures of RNAtranscripts
contain-ing
these RNA-2mutantsyielded
levels ofplus-
andminus-senseRNA-2 thatwere less than5% of the
wild-type
levels(Fig.
2a andb,
lanes 3through 5).
The
coding region
of RNA-2 was not alteredby
thesemutations,
and sufficient viralprotein
2a wastranslated in theprotoplasts
tofunction intrans topermit
the accumula-tion of progenyRNA-1, RNA-3,
and RNA-4 atnearly
wild-type
levels(Fig. 2). However,
in the absence ofRNA-2no
replication
of inoculumcontaining
RNA-1 and RNA-3 occurred(Fig.
2a andb,
lanes6).
To determine the minimal amount ofRNA-2
required
topermit replication, protoplasts
weretransfectedwithinoculacontaining
serial dilutions of RNA-2transcripts
bearing
the3'
mutations. Theprofile
obtained formutant5'PsK(Fig. 2c)
2437
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
100
D
~~~~~~~~~~~~I
D AGG Cu
U A
UA
G
UCC GCUCUCGI
UUCCCAAG GAGAGU
AG GGGUUC U
G
dc
Ou
GCGGCC 580 CG GGU 'A
GU\
CG-660 40
U A
U A
Aknob
G C
C G
C AUA
FIG. 1. Secondarystructureof the 3'reg
the four BMV RNAs. The sequence show] which the mutationswestudied have beeni
tides arenumbered from the 3' end, andth the letters Ato D. The sequence substitut 5'+3'PsK mutations are indicated. For th stippled area indicates the deletion of 4 n (between bases 52 and 57).
was similar to the
profiles
obtained fc andAknob
(data
notshown).
Even at(1.9
ng/2
x105
protoplasts),
the dete RNA-4(Fig. 2c,
lane7)
showed that occurred. These data suggest that theproduced
when RNA-2mutanttranscri concentration <6 x103
molecules percienttosupport
replication
of RNA-1ashow that
amplification
of RNA-2 isncreplication.
In alllikelihood, only
asupplied
RNA-2 molecules entered the vivednuclease degradation prior
totrnBMV RNA-4 is
generated
from the promoter on RNA-3(7, 13, 14)
an( messengerfor viral coatprotein
in vitviral
proteins
aretranslated
from BMVRNA-3
(which also encodes protein
3a be involved in cell-to-cell transport['
supplied
aloneas aninoculumtobarle' concentrations ofup to 200,ug/ml (9
detection of
viralcoatprotein
inprotc inoculacontaining
the 5'PsK RNA-2 diprovides
strongsupporting
evidence tiprotein
2aarecapable of mediating
intfully
functional BMV RNAmolecules
Expression
inbarley protoplasts of 3'tRNA-likeregion. Although
the data data fromprevious experiments (8,
9protein
2a is translated from BMV R inoculumtobarley protoplasts,
thelo,
replication of
themutantstested doesrthe
possibility
that theinput
RNA-2 translation. Todirectly
address this RNA-2(At RNA-2) completely incapa
5' Psk
AGA
wasconstructed
by deleting
the 3' 200 nucleotides
(contain-AGA
ing
the minus-strand
promoter)
from
pT7B2
as aHindlIl-BamHI
fragment
(6)
and
wastreated with mung bean
nucle-5'+3'Psk
AGA
ase prior to ligation and transformation into Escherichia coli
ucu
JM101. The absence of the 3'
region
wasconfirmed by
agarose
gel electrophoresis (Fig.
3a)
and
Northern
hybrid-ization
analysis (Fig.
3b).
U-A
In
six of
eight
independent
experiments
(Fig.
3c),
trans-uU
3.
fection of barley protoplasts with RNA-1, RNA-3, and At
A A ,AG
ACCA
C
RNA-2
yielded
progeny
RNA-1
and RNA-3 but
noRNA-2.
AThe level
of
minus-sense RNAs
corresponding
toRNA-1
UA
and RNA-3
remained very low and
required
extended
auto-C
U
radiographic
exposure
for visualization
(data
notshown).
C
Although
aportion
of the detected
plus-sense
RNAs
might
A
represent
input
inoculum
(see below),
the
presenceof
sub-AA 20
genomic
RNA-4
(Fig.
3c)
indicated
that the RNAs
detected
UG
resulted from de
novosynthesis.
These data
unequivocally
"A
Cdemonstrated the
ability
of
At
RNA-2 to be translated
GA
A
A
without
replication.
The levels
of
RNA-1 and
(especially)
I G
A
RNA-4
werelower
atall
times examined
for
experiments
in
U
A
which
weused the At RNA-2
mutantthan for all
experiments
U
G
AB
that
included the
replication-defective
mutants(Fig.
1).
Presumably,
whereas the
low
level
of
replication
of the
ion
conserved in eachofdebilitated RNA-2 mutants provided sufficient protein 2a
n is that ofRNA-3 intotemplate to sustain the production of RNA-1, RNA-3, and
introduced.Thenucleo-RNA-4
atnear-wild-type
levels,
the
complete
absence of At
ie arms areidentifiedby
RNA-2
replication
led
torapid depletion
of
protein
2a and
tions for the5'PsK
andconsequently
much lower levels of
replication
of the other
te
Aknob
mutation,
the RNAs.iucleotides from arm C
In the two other experiments, when a probe specific for
the viral 3' tRNA-like
structurewasused,
hybridization
toRNA
migrating
atthe
position
of
wild-type
RNA-2
wasar mutants
5'+3'PsK
observed
for
progeny
arising
after
24
h
postinoculation
(p.i.)
the
lowest level used
(Fig. 3d).
Probing
the
sameblot
with
labeled
RNA
comple--ction
of
subgenomic
mentary
tothe
coding
region
of
RNA-2
revealed
tracesof
replication
of RNAs
input
At RNA-2
transcript
up
to10 h
p.i.
(Fig.
3e).
Both this
amount
of
protein
2a
band
and
aband that
comigrated
with
wild-type
RNA-2
wereLpts
weresupplied
at avisible in
the progeny
of
24-, 48-,
and
72-h-p.i.
samples
(Fig.
-
protoplast
wassuffi-
3e).
Support
for
the
belief that the
moreslowly
migrating
nd RNA-3.
They
also
band
represents
afunctionally
restored
RNA-2 sequence
tnecessary
for BMV
wasprovided by
detection of
elevated levels
of
progeny
small fraction
of
the
RNA-4 sequences
at24,
48,
and 72 h
p.i. (Fig. 3d),
presum--
protoplasts
and
sur-ably
because of the translation
of
the
newly
replicated
anslation.
RNA-2.internal
subgenomic
Thus
far,
wehave
notbeen
successful
in
obtaining
direct
d
is
avery
efficient
sequence
information for
the
putative
recombinant
RNA-2
:ro
(16). However,
nogenerated
in these
experiments.
A
trivial
explanation
of
ourRNA-4
orfrom
BMV
results
would
be the presence
of
tracelevels
of
wild-type
i,
which
is
thought
toRNA-2
in
ourincubation
mixtures. We believe this
tobe
5])
when
the RNA is
highly
unlikely
for the
reasonsdescribed
below.
(i)
When
y
protoplasts,
evenatappropriate primers
wereused,
amplification
of the DNA
0).
Consequently,
the
sequence
corresponding
to450 bases
upstream
of
the
3'
)plasts
transfected
by
terminus of both the cDNA clone of RNA-2
(pT7B2)
and the
ilution series
(Fig.
2d)
At RNA-2
construction
by
the
polymerase
chain reaction
hat very
low levels of
(19)
technique yielded
DNA
of
the
expected
size from
the
ransthe
replication
of
wild-type
clone but
notfrom
the
mutantconstruction
(data
not
shown).
(ii)
Tracelevels
of
wild-type
RNA-2
contamina-RNA-2
mutantlacking
tion in the
reagents
orsupplied
transcripts
would be
ex-described above and
pected
toresult in progeny virus
containing
all three
genomic
1)
strongly
imply
that
RNAs;
however,
noprogeny
RNAs
weredetected when
'NA-2
supplied
as anprotoplasts
wereinoculated with RNA-1 and RNA-3
(Fig.
2avresidual
capacity
for
and
b,
lanes
6).
(iii)
No
infection
wasdiscerned
after
iotrigorously
exclude
inoculation of
Chenopodium
hybridum,
asensitive local
is
replicated prior
tolesion host
for
BMV
(18),
with RNA
transcripts
of
At
RNA-2
,,
acDNA clone
of
and
wild-type
RNA-1
and RNA-3
atconcentrations
exceed-icitated in
replication
ing
300
,ug/ml.
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:2.612.65.304.74.297.2]1
2
3
4 5 6 . 12
3
45
6
1
2-
3-
4-1
-
2-
3-
4-48
h
2
h
C
d
110
- 84 - 47
-
33
- 24
-
16
1
2
3
l h 3h
4
19 h
5
67
30h
V
1
2 3
45 67 M
FIG. 2. Analysis ofprogeny RNAand protein in barley protoplasts. ANorthernblot analysis of progenyplus-sense (a) and minus-sense (b) RNAswasconducted followinginoculation of barley protoplasts with RNA transcript mixtures (2 ,ug each) containing wild-type RNA-1 and RNA-3 andwild-typeRNA-2 (lanes 1), 2/3t RNA-2 (lanes 2), 5'PsK RNA-2 (lanes 3), 5'+3'PsK RNA-2 (lanes 4), Aknob RNA-2 (lanes
5),or noRNA-2(lanes6). (c)Plus-senseprogeny RNAisolated from protoplasts inoculated with mixtures containing 2
p.g
each ofwild-typeRNA-1andRNA-3 and 2 ,ugof wild-type RNA-2 (lane 1) or 5'PsK RNA-2 at a level of 2
pg
(lane 2), 0.5 ,ug (lane 3), 125 ng (lane 4), 30 ng (lane 5), 7.8 ng (lane 6), or 1.9 ng (lane 7). The times below the gels indicate the autoradiographic exposures used to detect plus- and minus-senseRNAs.(d)Western
(immunoblot) analysis of viral coat protein synthesized in the experiments described for lanes 1 through 7 ofpanel c. Lane Vcontained purified viralcoat protein (-200 ng), and lane M contained standards (in kilodaltons) having the Mr values indicatedonthe right. The positionsof the four wild-type BMV RNAs are shown on the left. RNAs extracted from barley protoplasts (11) wereelectrophoresed in 1%agarose gels after denaturation with glyoxal and transferred to nylon membranes (6, 17). The blots were then hybridized with32P-labeled
minus- and plus-senseRNAprobes (6, 17) representing the homologous 3' region present on each of the four BMV RNAs. Proteinsamples from protoplasts were isolated by precipitation with 13 volumes of acetone and subjected toWestern
analysis (20) by using antiserum raised against BMV coatprotein.In
the case
of Q,B (15), generation of defective interfering
particles by
ligation of
ahost cell tRNA to the viral RNA has
been documented. The occurrence of analogous events as an
explanation
for our observations seems most unlikely since
it would
invoke efficient viral promoter functions for the
cellular
tRNAand the presence in the plant protoplasts of an
efficient
RNA
ligase. Moreover, the hybridization probe
used, for example, for the data shown in Fig. 3b and d is
highly specific
for the viral 3' terminus and would not detect
tRNAs
of host
origin.
In
ourprevious
experiments (6), no recombinational
res-toration
of
function
wasobserved when barley plants were
inoculated with wild-type transcripts of RNA-1 and RNA-2
plus
RNA-3
bearing either the 5'PsK mutation or mutation
4GG.
Replication
in protoplasts
of RNA-3 bearing these
mutations was reduced
to20
and
40%,
respectively,
com-pared
with that
of the
wild-type
control.
Replication
in
barley plants
was even moreseverely debilitated (6),
asituation
which
should lead
tostrong
selection for
recombi-nants
with
wild-type infectivity.
The
lack of
recombination
observed in such
experiments suggested
that the
frequency
of
this
phenomenon
is lower than
wasinferred from
theexperiments
of
Bujarski
and
Kaesberg
(2). Since
noevidence
exists for cell-to-cell
spread
of virus in
protoplast
systems,
the
similar intensities
for RNA-1 and the restored RNA-2
inlanes 5
through
7of
Fig.
3d and
eindicate that
recombina-tional
restoration of the
apparently
wild-type
sequence
oc-curred in
ahigh
proportion
of the
protoplasts during
therelatively
short
incubation
periods
used.
The
contrastbetween the apparent
frequency
of RNA
*
a~~
.
9*l'
to
*
t
W
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:3.612.115.506.76.439.2]2 3
C1 2 3 4 5 6
d
e
[image:4.612.119.512.76.332.2]6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
FIG. 3. (a) Electrophoretic analysis ofAt RNA-2 transcripts synthesized in vitro. A mixture of transcripts (0.5 Kg each) containing wild-type RNA-1 andRNA-3andeither wild-type RNA-2 (lane2)orAtRNA-2(lane3)waselectrophoresed in1%agaroseandstained with ethidiumbromide. The bands that comigrated with RNA-4 in lanes2and 3 resultedfromprematuretermination of RNA-3 transcripts; they
werenotdetected by the probe complementarytothe 3'-terminalsequences.Native BMV RNAswereusedasmarkers(lane 1).(b) Northern
blot ofthe RNAsshown in panela,demonstrating the lack of 3'-terminalsequencesin theAtRNA-2transcript. (c) Autoradiographshowing Northern hybridizationof plus-senseprogenyRNAsamplesisolatedfrom barley protoplastsinoculated with mixtures of RNA transcripts (2 Kgeach) containing wild-type RNA-1 and RNA-3 and AtRNA-2andharvestedat2.5(lane 1), 5.0 (lane 2), 10 (lane 3), and 24 (lane 4) h p.i. Lane 5containednoRNA-2. (d)Analysis ofprogenyRNAfromanindependentexperiment similartothatshown in panelc.Protoplastswere
harvested 2.5 (lane 2), 5.0 (lane 3), 10 (lane 4), 24 (lane 5), 48 (lane 6), and 72 (lane 7) h p.i. Lane 6 in panelcand lane 1 in panel d contained
theprogenyRNAisolated24h p.i.from barley protoplasts inoculated with all three wild-type RNA transcripts. Thehybridizationprobe used forpanels bthrough dwasspecific for the 3'-terminal region of BMV RNAs (6, 17). (e) Blot shown in panel d reprobed withsequences
representing the coding region of RNA-2. Thearrowheads in lanes 2 through 4 indicate the position ofAtRNA-2; in lane 5, thelower arrowheadindicates the position ofAtRNA-2, and theupperarrowhead indicates the position of recombinant RNA-2 bearing the restored
3'-terminalsequence.The Northern blot analysiswasperformedasdescribed in the legendtoFig. 2. An RNA probe specific for BMV RNA-2
wastranscribed from plasmid pT7T3B2 by using T7 RNA polymerase. This plasmid isaderivative ofpT7/T3 and contains 1,124 nucleotides
obtainedas aKpnI-SacIfragment from the coding region of pT7B2 (6).
recombination in
someexperiments and the complete
ab-sence
of
recombination in other, similar experiments is
puzzling. The
physiological condition of the host cells
orprotoplasts
maybe
animportant
parameterinfluencing the
frequency of recombination. Although the molecular
pro-cessesinvolved in RNA
recombination
arenotknown,
copychoice,
inwhich
the viral
RNA
polymerase switches
tem-plates
during minus-strand synthesis (10, 12), has been
invoked.
Further
characterization of recombination in the
protoplast
system,in which markers
onRNA-1
and RNA-3
areused
tohelp
map crossoversites,
appears to be apromising approach for elucidating
the mechanisms andfactors
involved. Such studies should permit evaluation
ofwhether RNA recombination
contributestotheinterchange ofgenetic
information between viruses infecting
animals,insects, and plants.
WethankC. C.Huntley for the BMV RNA-2-specific probe and
L. E.Marsh, J. C. Carrington, and G.P. Poguefor helpful
discus-sions.
Thisworkwassupported by Public Health ServicegrantAl22354 fromtheNationalInstitutes of Health.
LITERATURECITED
1. Ahlquist, P., R. Dasgupta, and P. Kaesberg. 1984. Nucleotide sequenceofbrome mosaic virusgenomeand itsimplicationsfor viralreplication.J. Mol. Biol. 172:369-383.
2. Bujarski,J. J.,and P. Kaesberg. 1986. Genetic recombination between RNAcomponentsofamultipartiteplantvirus.Nature (London) 321:528-531.
3. Dreher,T.W.,and T. C. Hall.1988.Mutationalanalysisof the
sequence and structural requirements in brome mosaic virus RNA for minus strand promoter activity. J. Mol. Biol. 201: 31-40.
4. Dreher, T. W., and T. C. Hall. 1988. Mutational analysis of the tRNA mimicry of brome mosaic virus RNA: sequence and structuralrequirementsfor aminoacylation and 3'adenylation. J. Mol. Biol. 201:41-55.
5. Dreher, T. W., and T. C. Hall. 1988. Replication of BMV and relatedviruses,p.91-113.InE.Domingo,J. J.Holland,and P. Ahlquist (ed.), RNA genetics, vol. 1. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton,Fla.
6. Dreher, T. W., A. L. N. Rao, and T. C. Hall. 1989.Replication in vivo of mutant brome mosaic virus RNAs defective in aminoacylation. J. Mol. Biol. 206:425-438.
7. French, R., and P. Ahlquist. 1987. Intercistronic as well as
terminal sequences are required for efficient amplification of
a
l
1 -_
2-4
4'-
41
-2' 3-4
-..
.:
W.
LI....
*
-
J
*SOeW*NU
XX
..f
-_ - w
...0
w4 ..1 2 3 4 5
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
brome mosaic virus RNA3.J. Virol. 61:1457-1465.
8. French, R., M. Janda, and P. Ahiquist. 1986. Bacterial gene
inserted in an engineered RNA virus: efficient expression in
monocotyledonous plant cells. Science 231:1294-1297. 9. Kilberstis,P.A.,L.S. Loesch-Fries,and T. C.Hall. 1981.Viral
protein synthesis in barley protoplasts inoculated with native andfractionated brome mosaic virus RNA. Virology 112:804-808.
10. Kirkegaard, K., and D. Baltimore. 1986. The mechanism of RNArecombinationinpoliovirus. Cell 47:433-443.
11. Loesch-Fries,L.S.,and T.C. Hall.1980. Synthesis, accumula-tion andencapsidation of individual brome mosaic virus RNA
components inbarleyprotoplasts. J. Gen. Virol. 47:323-332.
12. Makino, S.,J.G. Keck,S.A.Stohlman,andM. M.C.Lai. 1986. High-frequency RNArecombinationof murine coronaviruses. J. Virol. 57:729-737.
13. Marsh,L. E., T. W.Dreher,andT.C. Hall. 1988.Mutational analysis of the core and modulator sequences of the BMV
RNA3subgenomicpromoter.Nucleic Acids Res. 16:981-995. 14. Miller, W. A., J. J. Bujarski, T. W. Dreher, and T. C. Hall.
1986. Minus-strand initiation by brome mosaic virus replicase within the 3' tRNA-likestructureofnative and modifiedRNA
templates. J. Mol. Biol. 187:537-546.
15. Munishkin, A.V.,L. A.Voronin, andA.B.Chetverin.1988. An in vivorecombinant RNA capable of autocatalytic synthesis by
Q13
replicase.
Nature(London)
333:473-475.16. Pyne,J. W.,andT.C. Hall.1979.Efficient ribosome binding of
brome mosaic virusRNA4contributestoitsabilityto outcom-pete the other BMV RNAs for translation. Intervirology 11: 23-29.
17. Rao,A. L. N., T. W.Dreher,L.E.Marsh, and T. C. Hall. 1988. Telomeric function of the tRNA-likestructureofbrome mosiac virus RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA86:5335-5339. 18. Rochow, W. F. 1959. Chenopodium hybridumas alocal lesion
assayhost for brome mosaic virus.Phytopathology 49:126-130.
19. Sakai, R. K., D. H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel,S. J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G. T. Horn, K. B. Mullis, and H. A. Erlich. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with thermostable DNApolymerase. Science 239:487-491.
20. Towbin, H., T.Staehelin, andJ. Gordon. 1979. Electrophoretic transferofproteins frompolyacrylamide gelstonitrocellulose: procedure andsomeapplications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354.